Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Not Doing Enough For Veterans

By Nikos A. Leverenz, AlterNet. Posted November 11, 2005.


The sad reality is that many of the soldiers serving today in Iraq and Afghanistan will join the ranks of those who call the streets of America home.
Advertisement

On this Veteran's Day, Americans are serving abroad far away from their friends and loved ones. Hopefully, each of them will return home safely, finish their commitments to the military, and move on to rewarding civilian lives.

But the sad reality is that many of today's service members, including those currently stationed in the combat theaters of Iraq and Afghanistan, will join the ranks of those who call the streets of America home.

Indeed, the extent of the homelessness problem among veterans is already large. According to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), "as many as 200,000 veterans are living on the streets or in shelters, and perhaps twice as many experience homelessness at some point during the course of a year."

Are we doing enough? Not by a long shot. The Director of Homeless Veterans Programs at the VA admitted to The Washington Times last winter that they serve 100,000 homeless veterans each year. By its own numbers, the federal government is not meeting its obligation to those who have served.

On a positive note, the efforts of organizations like U.S. VETS -- which provides housing and employment assistance for homeless veterans -- deserve more support from politicians and citizens alike.

It's easy for someone to buy a bumper-sticker to proclaim that we should "Support Our Troops." The reality of current government policies is far less than ideal, however. Budget cuts for VA mental health and substance abuse programs, which date back to the Clinton Administration, should be reversed.

The demand for VA services surrounding mental health and substance abuse is likely to increase very soon. Recent media reports indicate that rates of alcohol and other drug use are on the rise among those serving in Iraq. The Army's Surgeon General just issued the results of a survey finding that 30 percent of those returning from Iraq developed some mental health problem shortly after returning home.

Regrettably, many homeless veterans are faced with underlying substance abuse and mental health issues. Those issues may be the underlying causes of their homelessness. To be sure, military service does not automatically lend itself to substance abuse or mental health problems, much less homelessness. But for those who have fallen through the cracks, we must find more comprehensive and constructive ways to deal with these serious problems. Above all, we must pursue policies that put the overall health and well being of our veterans first.

The national tragedy of an underserved veteran population is compounded by the incarceration of veterans who are suffering from substance abuse problems. Thankfully, we no longer imprison the mentally ill. This should also be the case for those who are using alcohol and other drugs in a manner that is detrimental to their health.

When it comes to jailing our veterans simply because they are dealing with a substance abuse problem, this nation needs to radically alter its present course. Comprehensive treatment that provides a continuum of care must be our first response, not banishment to a jail cell. Those who have placed their very lives at risk in the name of duty, honor and country deserve this small concession -- and so very much more.

Do those politicians who brandish the title of "leader" have the dedication to do what is right by the least of these brave souls?

Digg!

Nikos A. Leverenz is the Sacramento associate director of the Drug Policy Alliance.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"Combat" veterans come first!
Posted by: Sojourner on Nov 11, 2005 1:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While friends of my family did serve and some died in WWI, my father was too young and my grandfathers too old. After that, all who served were infantry. We survived WWII without any deaths among close family, even while 3 of the 4 uncles who served were in combat.

My older brother spent two years in intermittent combat on the front lines in Korea. He and I were not close after our teenage years, so it wasn't until shortly before his death that he shared any war experiences, other than humorous, with me.

I cannot express how proud I am to be his kin. He was one hell of a good sargeant. While I do not pretend to be able to judge him, I believe he and his family paid a terrible price for what he had to do to serve this country.

So, even while my only involvement with war was to demonstrate in the streets to end the nuclear arms race and bring our troops home from Vietnam, I do not begrudge a penny spent on veteran's affairs. I do wish it possible to make a distinction between combat troops and military bureaucrats.

Never having been there myself, I do still believe nothing compares to combat. Consequently nothing should be denied those who have risked their lives in military service. Whatever they need (and, again, a distinction must be made between what is needed and what is wanted) insofar as it is possible must be provided.

It happens I live a few blocks from a major VA hospital. The disabled who use public transportation are not always honored. And homeless vets are commonplace.

The wreckage of war takes a terrible toll upon us all, but by far mostly upon combat vets and their families. Some wounds cannot be touched even by money. But whatever costs must be borne, we must bear, for not to do so confesses utter and complete corruption.

War demands healing as well as battle. If we aspire to be the world's police force, and that's exactly what we've become, to not heal our combat casualties would bring down on us such shame as we might never escape. The needs of veterans and their families are part of "the general welfare." There is no choice but for our citizenry to do what we are called to do. It is our duty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Combat" veterans come first! Posted by: triana1326
ECLECTICIST, S. JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Nov 11, 2005 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Viet-nam veteran with two members of our family honored as Congressional Medal of Honor Recipients. our main "questionable thought" is "We love this country so much, but does this country love us as well....???


S...JIM...RODRIGUEZ+++EL ECLECTICIST+++
33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remembering...
Posted by: dpcosteajr on Nov 11, 2005 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be great if there were a unified way for all of us to show the contributions made by our fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters when it comes to the price of freedom. I know the star flags in people's front windows and on the doors have special meaning, but what if we tied ribbons on our car antennas to show relatives lost in war! Even a piece of string flapping in the air this day would show a simple symbol of rememberence.

Sorry if I've spelled anything wrong, I'm in a hurry leaving to go to work. God bless every one of them, those who are not enjoying the fruits of their labors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wanna solve this problem?
Posted by: kww355 on Nov 11, 2005 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Leverenz's piece was spot on. Not only are we getting more mental health problems with our vets, we're getting more horribly maimed survivors. Vets who would have died from their injuries in the Vietnam era are surviving due to better medical intervention both "in-country" and at hospitals to which they're medevac-ed.

Think any of them are going to get decent aftercare from a conservative government? Think again! Dubya has already proposed cuts to the VA budget.

Wanna solve this problem? End this lie-based war now and bring everyone home; and in the future, don't go to war without giving serious examination to every alternative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not enough done for veterans
Posted by: hammerbeck on Nov 11, 2005 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Absolutely! I'm a veteran of the US Navy. Every year about this time, I suggest that gift giving would be a wholly appropriate gesture of appreciation for those of us who've served. This year, for instance, I would like an iPod. Either a Nano or the big 30-60 GB mothers would be fine. Cash would also be welcome.

Surprisingly, nobody takes me very seriously. I'm only joking a little bit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad, Sad Reality
Posted by: cyclone on Nov 11, 2005 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My father was a Prisoner of War during WWII. He died an alcoholic, only spoke to me of actual combat one time, and there is no doubt in my mind that his war experience led to every questionable decision that he made post-war. And help for veteran's in his day was a hell of a lot better than it is now.

What we are doing to veteran's in today's "wars" is embarassing, inexcusable and disgusting. It's fine to get your ass blown off, but when you return don't expect any help from the government that you allegedly fought for to protect, because we "can't afford it." But we can afford 2 Billion per week to help blow the asses off of our troops. Priorities anyone?

Yet, the military and Government can't figure out why they can't meet recruitment goals. Although I know it won't happen, I, for one, hope that NOT ONE SINGLE AMERICAN volunteers to join the military in this country at the present time. All should resist, in mass, the inevitable draft that is headed our way as well. I can tell you that my kid will not join, voluntarily or through a draft. We will relocate before she is fighting a war, unless that war happens to be on the streets of America, with the goal being us taking our country back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Human Beings
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 11, 2005 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would do us all well to realize that homeless people are not bums,but human beings with problems. I had this brought home to me in a personal way. I once had a business in which I had to go into the center of the city and pick up a carload of merchandise every week. Parking space was rare. One day as a meter maid was giving me a parking ticket a homeless man sitting on the sidewalk said, "I told him not to park there". He had not and had said this out of meaness. It did make me notice him and I guess it made him notice me. The next week when I was loading my station wagon he asked if he could help. I said o.k. He went into the building with me and together we loaded up. I noticed that he did a much better job of packing than I did and told him so. He told me that he had worked for a mover. I don't know why he lived on the streets. He was certainly not lazy, and he had a good head on his shoulders. He told me that he had been in Viet Nam. He didn't seem to be an alcoholic or a drug user. He always looked clean and presentable but shabby. It got to be a routine. Every week if I had a load to pick up I'd give him three dollars, if I didn't I'd give him a dollar anyway. One day I had several new stuffed animals that I had no use for so I gave them to him. I thought that he could sell them and get a few bucks. Later, when I came out of the building he was sitting in his regular spot with the stuffed animals. He was trying to give them to the small kids that walked by with their parents. Here was a person who had nothing giving away something that he could have easily sold. As winter came on he disappeared and I thought that he had gone south. He didn't return in the spring. I never found out how he came to be homeless or what problems he had but I did gain respect for a fellow human being.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Very powerful Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
V.A.: NO WILL! NO BRAINS!
Posted by: krose on Nov 11, 2005 8:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE VA HASN'T THE WILL OR THE BRAINS to know how to help our veteran population with their psychological and psychiatric problems! This is from a professional who has worked inside of the system and who has had an intimate knowledge of it. The VA makes a lot of "noise" about what it does for our veterans (and how "modern" it is), but in the scheme of things, services are often denied, limited, or done very poorly, by poorly trained professionals often trained in foreign countries. (This is especially difficult when psychological treatment is involved, because of differing accents and customs, etc.) Also, foreign-trained professionals have not always had the best training in their countries of origin, to say the least! Care in the physical realm is somewhat better in the VA, but it is the psychological maiming that remains with these veterans and does the most harm. Funding cuts for services that are unimportant to wealthy upper class corporate campaign contributors begin right here, with services to those who are deemed unimportant in our society, including the poor, the elderly, and yes, even the veterans who have sacrificed their very lives in battle to save ours! What a pity!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Catastrophic Success
Posted by: acatastrophicsuccess on Nov 11, 2005 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I made a short film spurred by these very issues, and my hope was to draw attention to the severity of the difficulties that returning vets feel as well as provide information. Please take a look and pass on the link. I believe that the more we can educate people about the bind our vets face, the better chance we have at giving them real support.

www.acatastrophicsuccess.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I agree with Cyclone...
Posted by: NamVeT on Nov 11, 2005 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a Namvet. Whatever "aid" I was allotted when I came home was cut off within two years. I did'nt want to go, but I did. It would appear that we just might be fighting in the streets to take back our own country!!! hailbush & co. are setting us up now for martial law. The pandemic rhetoric (along with whatever terror event invented by this fucked up administration) is just pre-programming before king george tries to take over. You may think I'm crazy, but that's what I think is a distinct possibility. This administration is beyond corrupted. The bush administration has borrowed (spent) more money in five years than the other 42 presidents combined!! Wake up. Take our OUR country back before we can't leave our houses without "papers".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I can't be sympathetic
Posted by: badkitty on Nov 11, 2005 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't take rocket science to understand that both the Vietnam and Iraq wars were/are illegal and wrong. As the friend of several men who went to jail or are now Canadian citizens because they understood the Vietnam war was illegal and they understood the difference between right and wrong, and also knowing several men who fought in Vietnam and committed what can only be described as war crimes (killing innocent civilians), I see no reason why Vietnam vets should receive veterans benefits from my tax dollars. I feel the same way about Iraq War vets. This war has been prosecuted so badly by the military that I feel that there is no reason for a military or national guard in this country. When the army and marines did not secure the weapons depots in Iraq in the spring of 2003, I was furious at military command incompetence but now I look at those IEDS killing US soldiers and marines and think, "oh, removing those who don't understand the difference from right and wrong from the gene pool". I realize this will be a very unpopular comment, but don't underestimate my anger at the people who allow their bodies to enable these wars to be fought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I can't be sympathetic Posted by: NamVeT
» RE: I can't be sympathetic Posted by: royrogers
» RE: I can't be sympathetic Posted by: crusty
» RE: I can't be sympathetic Posted by: badkitty
» RE: I can't be sympathetic Posted by: royrogers
Do More for All of Us, Not Just Vets
Posted by: fairleft on Nov 11, 2005 10:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Veterans leave the military better off than most people their age without a college degree. Times are hard for everyone without rich parents, graduate school diplomas, or union jobs.

We need training and retraining for everyone, obviously not just for veterans. We need unionization throughout the service industries, to make those jobs better-paying, so everyone can make a decent life from service industry wages and benefits.

Military service, like high school, by and large doesn't prepare people for the job market. I think the answer is not to reform the military to make is a post-military job preparation institution, but to reform our high schools so they are once again useful places for non-college bound students. Like they were before the massive cuts in vocational education in the 1970s.

Alternatively, or in addition, we could provide everyone a free first two years of college or the equivalent, and everyone could get job skills that way. The money for that could come from cutting the obscenely bloated military budget in half. Of course, we'd have to reverse corporate globalization too, so that well-prepared students will have places other than Walmart to work when they get out of school.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Former NC Senator John Edwards finally regrets his vote on the war in Iraq
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 11, 2005 12:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article Cornbread and Roses
by Bob Moser

Chapel Hill, North Carolina



In an interview after the UNC speech, Edwards finally utters the words he'd assiduously avoided during the last campaign: "I voted for the resolution," he says. "It was a mistake." So far, so good. But he goes on, "The hard question is, What do you do now? Looking back, it's easy to say that it was wrong and based on false information. Anybody who doesn't admit that isn't honest, and that's the truth." So what now? "I myself feel conflicted about it," Edwards replies. "But we have to find ways--and I don't mean just yanking all the troops tomorrow--but we have to find ways to start bringing our troops home. Our presence there is clearly contributing to the problem." So does he agree with Senator Russ Feingold that Washington should set a withdrawal deadline? "No. Even if we're going to say that internally, that we're gonna have our troops out by X date, there's no reason to announce that to the world. I think that's probably a mistake." He doesn't agree, either, with Senator Clinton's call for more US troops to finish the job? "No sir!" Edwards says, sitting straight up in his chair. "Did she really say that?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Veterans do not come first
Posted by: Ingarose on Nov 11, 2005 7:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1969 I visited a girl friend in Manhattan when a young man came out of his apartment door and ranted and raved, waved his hands and made a speech which I could not understand. My girl friend came out and then told me that he was a Vietnam Vet who was physically harmless but mentally disturbed. I have never forgotten his face.

After more than twenty years my family fell on some hardships and we ended up living in a not so good neighborhood. Next door to us was a fifty something Vietnam Vet. He and his buddies made live totally misarable for us. As far as they were concerned we were the enemy. He even tried to have me arrested one time. But somehow I never forgot that young face in Manhattan so I tried hard to at least live in peace. After a while he was asking for some of our home grown tomatoes and beans. When they had meat with bones they would save them for our dog. One day, he and his band saved us from some robbers. (You see they had guns in their little shack).

Well, he and his buddies were also casualties of an ill fated war. People like O'Reiley would have called them thugs to be eliminated.

Once again we see vets coming back from Iraq. First the locals cheer for them for a couple of minutes to make good TV coverage and then they are forgotten. Someday, my son and grandchild (which I do not have yet) will meet a fifty some Iraqi vet mistrusting all and everyone.

Forget the ribbons, flowers, great speeches just understand them, even when they want to kill or imprison you.

What horrow we have done to America and our young people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

emmaliz
Posted by: emmaliz on Nov 13, 2005 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is anyone aware of how the Republican budget cuts are affecting combat vets? I know of two who can't get their surgeries done in Phoenix, even though they have had surgery there before. It seems that the cuts have made it necessary for them to actually live in the county of Maricopa in order to qualify. This new requirement excludes all vets receiving care at VA facilities all over Arizona. Even though they are VA patients with substantial disabilities, they cannot get their medical needs met. Thanks, Georgie, for creating a whole new bunch of screwed up vets with no where to go for help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]