Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Quiet Oil-for-Food Scandal

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted November 4, 2005.


We aren't going to hear much about the corporations that paid bribes in the Oil-for-Food scandal because Bush's family, friends and closest advisors are in it knee-deep, along with some Democrats.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why the End May Be Coming for Coal
Christine MacDonald

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Study Claims Even the Most Sophisticated Readers Can Be Manipulated
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Joshua Holland

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Last week, the Independent Committee investigating the Oil-for-Food program (OFF) released its final report detailing how Saddam Hussein's regime skimmed just under two percent from the otherwise successful relief effort by charging kickbacks and "inland transportation" fees to companies doing business with Iraq.

The small group of conservative writers who I've dubbed the "Scandal Pimps" have been less enthusiastic about the release of this report than they've been about those that preceded it. The day after the release, the Wall Street Journal editorialized that the report didn't really add anything new, it just filled in some details.

What they characterized as "details" were actually the names of over 2,000 companies that paid bribes to the Hussein regime for a shot at buying Iraq's oil, selling spare parts for its oil infrastructure or providing humanitarian goods for a population starving under the U.S./ U.K.-led sanctions regime.

The Scandal Pimps have been low-key because the final report of the Committee -- known as the Volcker Committee for its chair, former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker -- offers further evidence that what they've worked so hard -- and so successfully -- to portray as a massive UN scandal has always been a relatively modest corporate scandal, interesting more for the players involved than because of its scale.

The details the Journal editors referred to include the process by which Saddam and his cronies squeezed what were effectively bribes out of multinational corporations, great and small. Contracts were submitted to the United Nations where they were reviewed by the Security Council states (the U.S. and Britain were the only ones that reviewed every contract). Revenues from approved sales were deposited into UN-administered trusts from which goods could be purchased. But before companies could "lift," or load, oil, they had to come up with some cash for the Iraqi government. Those fees and surcharges were paid directly by the companies either into Iraqi-controlled accounts (mostly in Jordan) or as bags full of cash dropped off at Iraqi embassies around the world. The illicit funds -- widely reported by the media at the time -- never touched UN hands.

More to the point, the Scandal Pimps are unlikely to delve too deeply into the final report because it reveals that some of our leading corporations, and the vaunted "entrepenuers" that outlets like the Washington Times always crow about, weren't in the least bit reticent to pay off a brutal dictator accused of mass murder in order to pump up their bottom lines.

Even more damning to the conservative worldview is that the United States' "strategic class" was deeply involved. In fact, profits from sales under OFF program that were lubricated with illicit payments to Saddam Hussein found their way into both the Bush and Kerry presidential campaigns of 2004.

You wouldn't know that from the modest coverage of this most interesting report. Most of the reporting has focused on the fact that many of the contracts went to French and Russian companies. The Washington Post's take was typical: "most of those allegedly receiving rewards were not Americans. The preponderance of lucrative contracts went to French and Russian companies, on the grounds that their governments opposed the sanctions regime and favored Iraq in the U.N. Security Council."

That's technically accurate but substantially false. In a global economy, distinctions between "American" or "French" companies are essentially a joke. The Volcker report paints a picture of layer upon layer of front companies and cut-outs, off-shore subsidiaries and hastily slapped together strategic partnerships: "Iraq's preference for French companies and the limited number of recipients in France for Iraqi crude oil led certain companies to pass themselves off ... as being French-based." The report cites a 1998 letter from a French official to an Iraqi official based in Paris, in which he expressed "his concerns and his government's concerns ... regarding the increase in British and American companies as well as others who exploit the decision of the Iraqi leadership in providing priority to conducting business with French companies by signing contracts with Iraq through their offices in France."

The Associated Press reported that "the difficulty of finding out who paid kickbacks in the U.N. Oil-for-Food program is illustrated by two Liechtenstein-based firms, Alcon Petroleum and Fenar Petroleum."

Both were set up late in the program -- Alcon in 2000, Fenar in 1999 -- and almost immediately landed huge contracts to buy oil from Iraq. Both companies are registered only under the names of trustee firms, meaning their owners' names and nationalities were undisclosed.
After a Reston, Virginia-based firm, Midway Trading, plead guilty to OFF related charges last month, the Washington Times tried to figure out who owned the company. "So far," the Times editors wrote, "the only answer is a shadowy one. There is no directory listing for a Midway Trading in the Reston area and in the past 10 years there is no mention of the company in any major Virginia or Washington newspaper." The Times editors called "the only listed company in Reston called "Midway" for comment -- Midway Oil Holdings, Inc., an offshore holding company with offices in Switzerland and Greece -- but the calls went unanswered, as did an email."

The fact is the United States, which consumes about a quarter of the global energy supply, received 36 percent of all oil exports from Iraq -- mostly through middle-men and cut-outs -- and American companies and individuals profited from those sales.

The Bushies, Saddam and why we'll never get to the bottom of the OFF story

In a widely-reported interview a year ago, Paul Volcker said, "Look, we have problems with the American government ... I can't say that the American government has been eager, or officials of the American government have been particularly eager in some cases." He added: "I'm talking about the executive branch."

That was nothing new. In April, 2004, news reports claimed "the U.S. administrator in Iraq, L. Paul Bremer, deliberately put the brakes on an investigation by the Iraqi Governing Council into ... bribes, kickbacks and smuggling at the U.N. Oil-for-Food program."

At around the same time, Bremer's replacement, John Negroponte, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the Bush administration "can identify the private business firms that cut kickback deals with Saddam Hussein, but intends to keep the names secret," according to reporter Lawrence O'Rourke.

A month later, U.S. troops and their Iraqi trainees raided the home of former Iraqi exile Ahmad Chalabi. According to Forbes, "The raid on Chalabi's home -- characterized by the White House as resulting from an Iraqi-led investigation -- may frustrate the ability of private accounting firm KPMG to complete a comprehensive audit into the Oil-for-Food program."

One reason for the administration's obstructionism is apparent in the way Forbes described the scandal -- before the Scandal Pimps framed it to their liking -- as one "involving top U.S. accounting firms, powerful K Street lobbying firms and international oil companies widely held by institutional and individual investors."

But it's more than that. Oil-for-food is a scandal that hits close to this administration.

The Committee found that at least two companies in the Carlyle Group had contracts -- and paid surcharges -- under the program. Petroplus, through its Dutch subsidiary, had two contracts to purchase oil worth almost $80 million dollars. It's listed as an underlying financier of contracts worth $44 million. Petroplus had $150,0000 in "surcharges" levied for the sales, but apparently never actually paid the bribes, which are listed as "outstanding."

Another firm in the Carlyle Group, Rexnord Industries, sold Iraq a half-million dollars worth of spare parts, for which it paid the regime bribes of around $50,000 dollars. Rexnord is based in Milwaukee, but the transactions were channeled through its Belgian subsidiary.

George W. Bush left the Board of Carlyle years ago, but his father George H. W. Bush was on it until 2003, after the OFF program ended. The family's "fixer," James Baker, still serves on the company's board, as do Colin Powell and a veritable who's who of former officials from several administrations. A number of Clinton-era officials, as well as one of John Kerry's top foreign policy advisors, former Secretary of Defense William Perry, also sit on Carlyle's board.

James Baker's lawfirm, Baker Botts, represents Halliburton, the firm headed by Dick Cheney during the Clinton years. At least one Halliburton firm, Oil Tools International, is listed in the latest report as having made sales of spare parts under the program and paying kickbacks to the regime.

That's in addition to the $73 million in business Halliburton did with Iraq during the sanctions regime under Cheney's leadership, as previously reported by the Washington Post.

Dick Cheney has a history of lobbying to lift sanctions in countries where Halliburton was doing, or hoped to do, business. Those countries include Burma (he signed an amicus brief against the Massachusetts Burma Law), Libya, Iran and Azerbaijan. During the 2000 presidential campaign, he acknowledged that Halliburton -- through off-shore subsidiaries -- did business in those countries but insisted "Iraq's different."

Jack Kemp, former Republican Vice Presidential candidate and former head of the anti-tax group Freedomworks -- which coordinated artificial folksy townhalls for President Bush's Social Security tour last year -- also lobbied to have the sanctions regime against Iraq lifted. According to MSNBC, Kemp has been questioned by the FBI about his dealings with Samir Vincent, a major player in the OFF scandal who was indicted for lobbying on behalf of Iraq in exchange for millions of dollars in illicit funds.

Kemp, James Baker, Samir Vincent and former Reagan Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci -- now Chairman of the Carlyle Group -- all sat on a committee to promote "economic development" in the Middle East organized by Kemp in 2003. According to MSNBC, "Carlucci told Kemp that Vincent was a 'good guy,' said Kemp, who added that Carlucci and Vincent were tennis partners."

And then there are the contributors. Among the biggest American players in the Iraqi markets were Bayoil (registered in the U.S. and the Bahamas), the Valero Energy Group and Texas oilman Oscar Wyatt (working through several different corporations he owned, and as an individual).

Bayoil, which was indicted in April, was among the biggest financiers of Iraqi oil deals. The firm financed more than $7 billion dollars in sales to Russia, China, Europe and the U.S., including to Oscar Wyatt's firms, Nafta Petroleum and the Mednafta Trading Company. The company itself lifted 403 million barrels of crude under the program. Bayoil's president, David Chalmers Jr. later used an Italian front company, Italtech -- formed with a former associate, Augusto Giangrandi, to solicit additional contracts from Iraq.

Giangrandi had made friends among high Ba'ath Party officials during the 1980s, when he "arranged the sale of almost $200m of cluster bombs and other armaments to Mr Hussein's regime" in violation of a weapons ban then in effect, according to the Financial Times.

According to his FEC disclosures, the overwhelming majority of David Chalmers' contributions have gone to Republican candidates, PACs and the RNC.

Oscar Wyatt was also indicted for his role in bribing the Iraqi government. His companies lifted a half billion dollars worth of Iraqi oil. He paid the regime over $7 million in surcharges. Wyatt is a major political contributor, having given about $700,000 dollars since 1989, according to the Houston Chronicle. The majority, a half-million, went to Democrats, although he has been generous with Republicans as well. More than party affiliation, though, Wyatt is an integral part of the same Texas oil circles as the Bush family.

According to the Volcker Report, Valero was the underlying financier of $186 million in sales to Wyatt's companies. According to the /store.publicintegrity.org/oil/db.aspx?act=cinfo&coid=0000112165" target=window>Center for Public Integrity, Valero spent $830,000 lobbying in 2003 and donated over a half million to campaigns in 2004, 70 percent to Republicans.

Koch Industries financed two contracts worth over $185 million dollars to South Africa's Mocoh Services. A half-million in bribes were paid on the contracts. Koch is not only a heavy donor to Republican campaigns and a firm that lobbies extensively, it's also a pivotal funder of the new conservative movement, with family foundations that gave away over $9 million dollars in 2001 to right wing causes (among their major recipients is Jack Kemp's Freedomworks, which received over $12 million dollars in Koch Foundation cash between 1985-2002, according to the Center for Media and Democracy).

And then there's Marc Rich. Rich, a whipping boy of the right known for his last-minute pardon by Bill Clinton is actually close to influential figures on both sides of the aisle. Rich's lawyer, dating back to the 1980s was none other than recently indicted Cheney aide Irving "Scooter" Libby, who received over $2 million dollars in legal fees from Rich over the course of their relationship.

Rich -- through various French front-companies he established for the purpose -- not only lifted over eight million barrels of oil (paying around $1.5 million in bribes), but his companies financed over $430 million dollars in oil sales.

It's because of the bipartisan nature of the top of the heap -- all those companies that donated tons of cash to the Republicans also gave some to the Democrats in case they ever regain power -- that means we'll never get to the bottom of what is a revealing corporate scandal.

While the Volcker report will result in major investigations into companies from Russia, Jordan and notably India -- where the report is causing shock waves that have rattled the ruling coalition government - here in the U.S., no investigation will go beyond the U.N. itself. We'll get investigations run by political hacks like Norm Coleman (R-Minn.) and James Inhofe (R-Okla.), whose committees will limit themselves to supposed perfidy within the UN and show no taste at all for uncovering the web of oil traders and bankers that descended, vulture-like, on Oil-for-Food.

For more on how U.S. companies side-step sanctions, see this 2003 Mother Jones article.

This article has been corrected. The article did not clearly state that Jack Kemp is no longer chairman of FreedomWorks.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Joshua Holland is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
WHAT THE HELL ARE WE WAITING FOR PEOPLE!!!!!!!
Posted by: stoney13 on Nov 3, 2005 5:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to go to Washington and drag them all the fuck out of the White House and kick thei asses!!!!!

C'mon people!!! How much more are we going to take!!!

Sorry!! I'm to pissed off to type!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Voting Machines do not work Say GAO report to Senate
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Nov 4, 2005 12:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not sure how to make links works, but Huffington Post ran this article yesterday. I proves without a doubt the the voting machines have been rigged and there is no way to keep them from being tampered with. I have not idea why this is not being noted every where. We have a year to change things. How do we do that now?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brad-friedman

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, NOW I remember!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 4, 2005 3:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In light of the terrible events of the last five years, looking out over the wasteland of destruction that has been inflicted on this country and the world by the policies Bush administration, I have at times found myself asking, "what the hell was I thinking when I left the democratic party"??

This article just reminded me.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh, NOW I remember! Posted by: cstriker
» RE: Oh, NOW I remember! Posted by: lrrysgl
» RE: Oh, NOW I remember! Posted by: Tom Degan
Ellipses
Posted by: farmer's daughter on Nov 4, 2005 5:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to know what was omitted from the quotes from the Volcker report, Paul Volcker and "news reports" where ellipses were used. Did the omissions change the meaning or the context of the quotes? Why bother to edit in that way?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ellipses Posted by: JoshuaHolland
The real surprise
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 4, 2005 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was not at all surprised that American corporations bribed officials to make money, or that both Democrats and Republicans are involved. This is normal, these same companies bribe both parties with campaign contributions. What did surprise me is that they were investigated. How do these investigations of powerful people get started? Do we have some honest politicians?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The real surprise Posted by: cstriker
» RE: The real surprise Posted by: Lincoln fan
We the people
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 4, 2005 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though we the people have the clout,
To vote the politicians out.
We'd still be ruled by sleazy smarties,.
Who pay money to both parties
Now here's the truth, without a doubt,
You can't vote those rascals out.

The Lincoln Initiative is a non-partisan grassroots movement. There are no leaders, no dues, no contributions, and no registration. To join, follow the suggestions at a new idea

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republocratic corruption--there is a cure
Posted by: John Rice on Nov 4, 2005 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I must point out that many articles like the above, covering many facets of our lives are being addressed by the Neither Party.
I urge all who are pissed to check out what the Neither Party is (www.neitherparty.org) and help direct it toward what you can enthusiastically endorse in the future.
Neither Reps nor Dems have the backbone to honestly investigate themselves or each other--only a third party effort can confront, expose and the provide for the judicial review such treachery demands.
Mark Twain might have said it best: "Look at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattels, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction; and forgetting or ignoring that their fathers and the churches shouted the same blasphemies a generation earlier when they were closing their doors against the hunted slave, beating his handful of humane defenders with Bible texts and billies, and pocketing the insults and licking the shoes of his Southern master." -- Mark Twain, "The Character of Man,"
Twain describes the rationale for Neither.
There is a solution to this mess. Please join others in finding it and making that vision come to pass.
Regards,,,John

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A few more thoughts ...
Posted by: JoshuaHolland on Nov 4, 2005 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are posted over in The Mix.

Also, if you haven't read my previous reports on Oil-for-Food, they're here and here.

JH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Ownership of Midway Trading Posted by: wanderindiana
» RE: Thank You Joshua ... Posted by: Captainmagic
Well there goes another right wing talking point shredded
Posted by: Fade on Nov 4, 2005 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally, we can take a break from the U.N. Haters ranting and raving. It's about the oil stupid. Well, the stupid Republican hacks have lost another issue to rail about. If they had some ability to think beyond the moment, they should have known that Big business had their stamp all over this scandal as well.

Oil-Scandal-Iraq... Why wouldn't Bush's closest friends be involved? What next? Is Rush still whining about Air America? The myopia of the right wing is as amusing as it is infuriating.

A sense of perspective would be nice. We will never have that though.

Typical Freeper/Right winger argument:

"How dare you accuse of us of Murder/Treason/Genocide/Wars for profit/Torture/Guilty until proven innocent.- We clearly saw a Democrat jaywalking just yesterday! Think of the possible lives lost if a car had to swerve to avoid him! And what about the effect on the economy of that Democrat walking? Why isn't he driving? His refusal to use as much oil as possible is what is contributing to this recession!"

"Recession?" a thoughtful listener asks..

"Umm-er- The economy is great! Bush has fixed what Clinton brought to ruin! I meant to say that if Democrats continue their evil jaywalkery, they might as well move to Sweden! USA! USA!"

and so on. And we are the "moonbats". Ugh. Stupidity is never pretty, but always curable. I am doing my best to fight the plague, one boot to the ass at a time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real reason why the liberals are not standing up to this neoconservative mess
Posted by: NDnative on Nov 4, 2005 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read this article on a lot of these well known liberals and why their lack of long term dedication or commitment towards building a progressive and truly liberal infrastructure for the Democratic party has made "liberal hypocrites" out of these people.

Michael Moore Owns Halliburton Stock

At least now you know why Nancy Pelosi never gives a hoot about labor unions or for that matter even tries to get the Democrats all lined up in favor of labor and cracking down on uncalled for union busting in corporate America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It’s irreparably broken.
Posted by: rabblerowzer on Nov 4, 2005 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It’s irreparably broken.

How do you fight corruption when the system itself, and elected and appointed officials in both parties are the source of corruption? How do you reform government when elected and appointed officials in both parties make and enforce laws that specifically facilitate, encourage, conceal, defend and protect corruption?

Progressives must concede that Reagan was just one word short of being correct when he stated, “Government is not the solution, it’s the problem.”

CORRUPT government is not the solution, it’s the problem.

Our government is way too corrupt to reform now. Kick them all out, and then start over from scratch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It’s irreparably broken. Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: It’s irreparably broken. Posted by: badkitty
» RE: It’s irreparably broken. Posted by: Michelle
Time for a 3rd political party in the USA
Posted by: Smiggsy on Nov 4, 2005 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imagine if everything about life in the US was about the choice of just 2 ......would you tolerate that. BORING. Any wonder so many people in the US have lost interest in politics....

Imagine in life you only got the choice of 2 types of automobiles, 2 choices of burgers, 2 sporting teams in each sport (or only 2 sports), 2 labels of clothing, 2 types of beer, 2 brands of shampoo, etc, etc (one could go on endlessly) Why only two political parties. THATS mundane & not to mention insane.

Every genuinely pissed-off american should join together to start a new political party or 3 or 4 new political parties. Ditch the old 2 party system crap. Let it wither & die. Old parties have gone by the wayside before. Nothing will ever change if there is no real change. It most likely will get worse

Imagine 4 or 5 different political parties in congress with the same number of seats/votes. THAT would certainly make for genuine & interesting politics. Coalitions would have to be formed just to make government. So there may be a little instability. What could be worse than the rampant corruption going on at present. Coalitions in government have been very successful in many other civilised westernised nations without a collapse of government.

You might very well see a democrat-republican coalition gov't which would probably reveal to all whether the theories on the current corporate political alliances really stand true.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YOU‘RE FIRED!
Posted by: rabblerowzer on Nov 4, 2005 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YOU‘RE FIRED!

Our congressmen and women make $165,000 a year, which is a helluva lot more that most of us make. We The People pay them that, not the lobbyists, not campaign contributors, not party leaders and not the president.

We The People have been betrayed by our employees, the public servants we elected to represent us. They haven’t just ignored our interests, they attack and subvert our interests. The corrupt cannot and will not end the corruption that is the bane of our existence. Until we break the stranglehold the Republicans and Democrats have on the country, there is nothing we can do to remedy the situation. Voting for the lesser of two evils changes nothing.

We must prepare for the next election by examining the candidates’ credentials and positions on issues important to us. Ignore all the incumbents and focus on the newcomers of either party and third party candidates. Vote for ones you think come closest to what you want. We can’t replace Republicans and Democrats until we have something to replace them with. By dumping the incumbents, we can shatter party loyalty and infuse the newcomers with the reality of whom they better serve. If they don’t do what we want, we’ll fire them too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: YOU‘RE FIRED! Posted by: cstriker
» RE: YOU‘RE FIRED! Posted by: crusty
Oil-for-Food Scandal Pimps
Posted by: BlueInRed on Nov 5, 2005 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great investigative reporting, and I love the "scandal pimps" moniker.

Now, a syntax lesson: "reticent" is not a synonym for reluctant, as people increasingly seem to believe. It means "disinclined to speak" (or, you might say, "reluctant to speak"). Make a note of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

India FM resigned - Cheney, when will you?
Posted by: The Underboss on Nov 7, 2005 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corruption is rampant in this country - we're putting third world countries to shame with our blatant disregrad for accountability, abuse of power, etc, in the government.

Shame on us...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement