Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Excerpt: Slam Dunks and No-Brainers

By Leslie Savan, AlterNet. Posted November 11, 2005.


Pop language is the difference between 'old hat' and 'so five minutes ago.'
SlamDunks

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Leslie Savan

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

[This is an excerpt from Leslie Savan's new book, Slam Dunks and No Brainers: Language in Your Life, the Media, Business, Politics, and Like, Whatever. Test your own pop language skills with this quiz constructed by Savan when you're finished with the excerpt.]

Here's the Deal

From the tough-guy kick ass to the airless opt, from the high-strung Hel-lo?! to the laidback hey, from the withering whatever to the triumphant Yesss!, an army of brave new words is occupying our social life with coast-to-coast attitude. The catchwords, phrases, inflections, and quickie concepts that Americans seem unable to communicate without have grown into a verbal kudzu, overlaying regional differences with a national (even an international) pop accent that tells us more about how we think than we think.

What makes a word a pop word? First of all, we're not talking mere clichés. Most pop phrases are indeed clichés -- that is, hackneyed or trite. But a pop phrase packs more rhetorical oomph and social punch than a conventional cliché. It's the difference, say, between It's as plain as the nose on your face and Duh, between old hat and so five minutes ago. Pop is the elite corps of clichés.

Nor is the pop vocabulary simply a collection of slang. Some pop phrases, like bling bling or fashionista, may technically be slang, or "nonstandard" and probably transient English. But most pop speech today is made up of perfectly ordinary and permanent words, like don't go there and hel-lo. It's how our tongues twist them that changes everything.

Here's my definition: Pop language is, most obviously, verbal expression that is widely popular and is part of popular culture. Beyond that, it's language that pops out of its surroundings; conveys more attitude than literal meaning; pulses with a sense of an invisible chorus speaking it, too; and, when properly inflected, pulls attention, and probably consensus, its way. (And if it does most of the above, it gives you a reward: a satisfying "pop.")

There have always been popular catchphrases, of course, and in the everyday jungle of small talk, they've always been used as verbal machetes, proven tools for cutting through confusion -- as well as for showing off, fitting in, dishing dirt, shutting someone up, flirting, and fighting. But today, as the media repeat and glamorize buzzphrases constantly, the ability to spout a catchy word or two has become a more highly valued skill -- a social equalizer, a sign that you, too, share the up-to-date American personality.

Or, to put that in pop: These phrases are our go-to guys -- whether flashing bling or singing "Ka-ching!," they get the job done.

And everybody has them working. Coming off a spate of fund-raisers in 2003, George W. Bush appeared on The Tonight Show and joked to Leno about the audience: "These folks didn't pay five grand apiece to get in here? I'm outta here!" As John Kerry took the controls of a helicopter on a campaign hop in Iowa, he shouted, "Rock 'n' roll!" And, of course, both men said (Bush of Iraqi insurgents, Kerry of Bush's attacks on his record), "Bring 'em on!" As it turns out, AARP-eligible presidential candidates are not so far removed, ideal-American-personality-wise, from babelicious Gen X actresses, like Cameron Diaz, who told Demi Moore in Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle, "Bring it on, bitch!"

Light, self-conscious, and theatrical, chockful of put-downs and exaggerated inflections, today's pop talk projects a personality that has mastered the simulation of conversation. It's a sort of air guitar for the lips, seeking not so much communication as a confirmation that ... hey, we're cool.

Human communication may seem to hold greater possibilities than that, but the first obligation of pop language is not to help us plumb life's mysteries but to establish that you recognize and can characterize any pre-characterized thing or situation. A famous person not looking up to par? Someone somewhere will say, "Bad hair day." A familiar name escapes you? I'm having a senior moment. Did you something dumb? "What was I thinking?" Producing the right phrase at the right time reassures us: I'm awake, it says. I connect.

The pop response can be punched in from Seattle to Waco, from the Laundromat to the New York Stock Exchange. Each modular phrase is part of a franchise deal, whose terms are the same everywhere. When I say "No way" and you say "Way," we may be exchanging a nod of appreciation for our mutual acquaintance with Wayne and Garth or Bill and Ted (assuming we're old enough to remember those characters), but we are also reducing each other to interchangeable parts, minor guest stars in that moment's passing sitcom.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Nov 11, 2005 3:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"attempts by the government and corporations to conceal truth...[and WORDS have the] ability to break through obfuscation [and] ...can be a powerful force for truth. "
Led to the birth of WAWA;

WAWA's words are derived from a SUBVERSIVELY CREATIVE IMAGINATION and The TRUTH, which is not at all pop for WAWA provokes DEEP thought.

WAWA:
www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DUH
Posted by: pacto on Nov 11, 2005 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its all part of .... .. the dumbing of america..........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Communication, and saying what people expect
Posted by: jwg on Nov 11, 2005 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We not only speak in cliches and pop words and phrases. This article reminded me of that. After returning from living in Cameroon in French West Africa, my son who was 18 months when we went and 5 when we returned one evening said, "Close the lights daddy".

An English speaker would say "turn off the lights". Because of his French immersion his direct translation from "Ferme le lume" made him sound like he was from somewhere else if not dropped here from outer space.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mick3
Posted by: mick3 on Nov 11, 2005 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How is using slang dumbing down? All language arises from dialect, and dialect is laden with such expressions. Today we say "goodbye" rather than "god be with you/ye" and not even deists (goddists?) find it objectionable. Language is enriched by slang, and I look forward to the day when the world says, "The Americans have a word for it," as used to be said about the French, before they got all het up it and began turning their language into a relic. I, for one, have said "neat" for many decades, and have watched it come and go twice. I treasure "bummer" and "far out" because nothing else quite says the same thing. Naturally, language faddists think I'm trying to be "cool" or whatever and don't know how "corny" it is. Not true. I'm merely sticking to my guns and not at all concerned with being au courant. Really, this is a tempest in a teapot. If there's a real a problem that I don't get, maybe people need to read more and watch lots less television, for starters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mick3 Posted by: dotfret
it's about more
Posted by: birdman on Nov 13, 2005 9:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In the past 50 years, by one reckoning, the working vocabulary of the average 14-year-old has declined from some 25,000 words to 10,000 words." (Charlene Spretnak, "The Resurgence of the Real," 1997)

It's probably even less today. Are these pop phrases super-condensed nuggets, containing depths of meaning beyond the few words in the pop phrase? Or are they a useful tool, in a culture that has always been anti-intellectual, of avoiding the expression of real thoughts and opinions?

One problem that Leslie Savan barely discussed (in the excerpt, at least) is the tendancy of pop phrases to reduce complexity to a simple, final opinion. This is the way it is and that's that. I don't want to hear any more about it! As such, those who wish to plant memes through pop language can direct thought by positing unchallengable finalities.

Language will always evolve. That's a Good Thing (TM). But, as Savan cautions, we need to be vigilant in understanding what we're really saying -- or if were actually saying anything at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]