Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Five Minutes With: Janeane Garofalo

By Maggie Brock, Campus Progress. Posted November 3, 2005.


The actress and radio host talks about Hollywood, Washington and the right-wing media machine.
Advertisement

[Editor's Note: This is a brief interview with the actress and radio host from late October. It was originally published on Campus Progress.]

A favorite in underground comedy for over a decade, Janeane Garofalo has appeared in numerous movies (including Campus Progress favorite "Wet Hot American Summer"), and was twice-nominated for an Emmy as a cast member of HBO's "The Larry Sanders Show". Garofalo was ranked by Comedy Central among the 100 Greatest Stand-Ups of All Time.

Unwilling to be depicted as a "know-nothing liberal celebrity," Garofalo has studied up and plays in the big time with right and left pundits as she defends her progressive politics on cable news, including sitting in as a guest host on CNN's "Crossfire." Today, she's the co-host of the popular "Majority Report" show broadcasting nationwide on Air America Radio. Not bad for the child of conservative parents (who she occasionally invited on the show to debate with).

Garofalo most recently appeared as a campaign adviser on NBC's "The West Wing." She sat down with Campus Progress to discuss Hollywood, Washington, and the media machine.

Have you learned anything about politics from working on "The West Wing"?

Um, no. Not things that I didn't already know. Actually, "The West Wing," the writers have far more integrity and soul than your average Washington politician. What I mean by that is mostly right-wing politicians tend to be amoral and nihilistic. The writers give the politicians far more credit than they really should, because the politicos, if you will, on "The West Wing" have great epiphanies, and moments of clarity, and struggles with their conscience, whereas I haven't seen any evidence of that in the Bush administration or lobbyists in general.

Having experienced both the world of Hollywood comedy folks and politicians and political media in Washington, which do you prefer? Does one feel like more of a boys' club than the other?

It's not a boys' club in a bad way, it's just dominated by males -- most things are. There are good people and bad people involved in all of those areas. It doesn't matter what your job is, you're either an asshole or you're not. There's just so little difference between what both industries are doing -- they're both selling a product whether it's Hollywood Boulevard, Madison Avenue or K Street. There aren't more assholes in show business or more assholes in politics than any other business in the world, I guess, except social work. I'm sure there are less assholes in Doctors Without Borders, that's probably true.

As an outspoken entertainer, how do you respond to Laura Ingraham's favorite phase: "shut up and sing."

She doesn't mean for Nashville right-wingers. And, um, she doesn't mean that for anyone in the NASCAR world who supports the President, and she doesn't mean that for any of the right-leaning actors like Chuck Norris and Angie Harmon and her husband, the football player, or Ron Silver who spoke at the RNC. She just means "shut up and sing if I don't agree with you."

Ron Silver and Ann Coulter, very disturbing couple.

They are a very disturbing couple, but they're been in love for years. They were high school sweethearts.

Is that true?

No, but I'd like it to be. Actually, I like Ron Silver a hell of a lot better than Ann Coulter -- Ron Silver is personable and funny. She's a performance artist and comedian in the spirit of Andy Kaufman. I don't know if she believes what she's saying. But it clearly works for her, because we're talking about her now.

Right-wing media can do angry and shrill really well. Are there lessons for the left to learn from what the right does with the media?

It's just bullying. The right wing machine, for the last 40 years, has successfully cowed the media into thinking there's a liberal bias, which there isn't, and then WAY overcompensating the other way. There's a reason they have to spend so much money and time pushing these narratives into the marketplace and manipulating the masses. It's because right-wing ideas and right-wing cruelty is not the norm -- it isn't. That's why they have to steal elections, that's why they have to use the threat of terror, that's why they have to gay bash, and manipulate your emotions. And what right wing radio hosts do -- they capture the people's lesser nature. It's very easy. The Bush campaign also brought out the worst in people. People's lesser nature is easily tapped into. You make people loyal when they're sitting in fear, in a heightened state of anxiety or anger. That's what the right does because it's easy.

So most media is more conservative than most Americans?

I saw an interview with Leslie Stahl of "60 Minutes" on "The Colbert Report" and she said that the country has moved far to the right since Reagan -- but that's not true. The corporate media has moved farther to the right. The people themselves have not, but the myth is that we as a country, as individuals, have. That's not true -- evidenced by how we live, that's not true. The multiculturalism, the acceptance of gays into the workplace. Twenty years ago there was more of a stigma on being gay. The Republican Party has to use these divisive wedges, have to pretend that it's a big deal, have to pretend the sky is going to fall if gays get married, whereas the average person is not concerned about that.


Digg!

Maggie Brock is a student at University of South Carolina.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Nov 3, 2005 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Garofalo always makes me laugh and her parting comment regarding shaking the fundamentalist evangelical base encourages us few, thoughtful, committed progressive Christian's from WAWA: www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Garafolo has Guts
Posted by: Stonecutter on Nov 3, 2005 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's good to hear someone with a profile say what appears obvious to any observant, rational, fair-minded person...Rove is gay. It's painful to watch the usual gutter-level character assassination flowing out of the White House, while the guy orchestrating this sleazefest is himself the embodiment of everything his "base" holds in mindless, ignorant contempt. Gee, why wasn't there more investigation regarding Jeff Gannon's off-peak visits to the WH? Anybody got a hint? Could it be, as Helen Thomas intimated on Bill Maher last week, that the press corp have been a bunch of wimps the past few years, more concerned with access and careerism than finding the outrageous truth sitting on their faces?

The reality is that several of the most visible waterboys in this pathological administration are gay. As Garafolo says, this is normally nothing to be ashamed of, but in the case of these vicious paranoids and their Darwinian ideaology, it should be plastered all over town. There should be billboards outing Rove and Mehlman and Perle and the rest of these lying dirtbags. Let's have a level playing field. Why are powerful gays promoting anti-gay, anti-American social and economic policies?

This morning, I heard on "Morning Sedition" that John Kerry's pathetic concession last year, despite obvious signs of fraud in Ohio and elsewhere, was brought on by advisors (Schrum the Bum) who told him he'd look like a "sore loser" if he protested. So Kerry caved, and indirectly gave the rest of us who had bled for him during the campaign a fascist state run by a dimwit, and about 1,000 more young dead GI's. Thanks alot, Senator.

It's time the progressive camp got some cujones and met this cold-blooded, amoral cabal and their butt boys on the field of political battle. Now is the time. Now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Garafolo has Guts Posted by: swatson
Janeane is fighting the good fight..
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Nov 3, 2005 1:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for all of us and I suspect at some sacrifice to her career.

Thanks, it is noticed and appreciated.

(And she's still a hell of an actor.)

New on EWM: Kevin Bacon to play Libby in upcoming “Six Degrees of Scooter”

It’s ‘Dumb and Dumber’ meets ‘All the President’s Men.’

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No substitute for winning elections, janeane
Posted by: gerdhansel on Nov 3, 2005 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Honestly, the left has got to start relying less on the courts to press their agenda and more on winning elections.

Nine unelected lawyers appointed for life can always die and be replaced by people who will vote for things you don't agree with. And you have no recourse, none whatsoever.

Start thinking realistically about how to win elections and win them convincingly. Learn to talk to rednecks without being condescending and insulting their culture and their intlligence.

Don't nominate any more New England twits for President. Put a Bubba on the ticket like Bill Clinton, somebody the rednecks will vote for.

Repeat after me, moderate Southern governors, moderate Southern governors.

And accept the fact that you can't win without redneck votes. Face reality.

Find common ground with the rednecks, and a few more of them might just vote for your guy. They're just as worried about their economic plight as most of you are.

Try harder to convince the rednecks that the Republicans are just blowing smoke up their dress with all this propaganda about God, Guns and Gays. They're playing a shell game with the religious redneck world, convincing these people to vote against their economic self-interest.

It would greatly help your cause if the Bill Mahers of the world immediately stop calling religious people stupid. Get over your bias against people of faith, because you cannot win elections without their votes.

Ridiculing Southern Evangelical Christians may be good sport for many progressives, but if you don't put a sock in it you're going to keep losing, losing, losing.

Win elections, repeat after me, win elections.

You vote for somebody and he doesn't represent your values, then vote for somebody else the next time. You rely on nine lawyers in black robes to save your hiney, better get ready to kiss that bad boy good-bye.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» what is and isn't republican lite Posted by: gerdhansel
Karl Rove Gay?....
Posted by: CatDad on Nov 4, 2005 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmm....I’m a gay man and I’ve never heard that before...he gets a zero on my gaydar. For our sake I hope it isn’t. If it is true, it would match a certain profile of an extremely self-loathing homosexual who deflects issues regarding his own sexuality by attack gays. Rove would join the ranks of J. Edgar Hoover and Roy Cohn.

Gay men can be every bit as shallow and narcissistic as their straight brothers when judging those they are respectively attracted to. The beautiful and/or young are near the top, while the unattractive/overweight are at the bottom. We all know where Karl fits in here. If he is gay, he probably experienced a double whammy of rejections: first by the straight community, where he didn’t belong, then the gay community, where he wasn’t accepted. Contrary to the stereotype of the slender, attractive and neat gay man, gays come in all shapes and sizes like straights. Gay men who look like Karl Rove usually have only one type of gay outlet: the bathroom stalls of Sears in small-town suburbia. This sort of alienation usually results in a seething cauldron of self-hate. In Karl’s case, he might have made a productive use of this negative energy by channeling it into his successful brand of politics.

If all this is true, then the Jeff Gannon angle now makes sense. If Karl is indicted he will be outed and everything that has gone wrong since 2000: the 9-11 intelligence failure, the failed Iraq War, botched hurricaine relief efforts...will be blamed on the homo Karl.

Speaking of closet right wingers, now Ralph Reed scores high on my gaydar. I would not be surprised if he’s a “family” man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Karl Rove Gay?.... Posted by: thirdmg