Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Pakistan's Invisible Quake Victims

By Jalal Ghazi, Pacific News Service. Posted November 2, 2005.


Arab media commentators say Pakistani victims from the Oct. 8 earthquake are forgotten because they are Muslims.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jalal Ghazi

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Viewed through the lens of Arab media, world relief efforts for the earthquake in Northern Pakistan were far less than other natural disasters because the victims are Muslims, many pundits said. The Oct. 8 quake killed at least 55,000 people and injured tens of thousands. With winter settling in, millions will be left homeless and vulnerable, Arab media warned, unless more actions are taken by the world.

The October 21 issue of Asharq Al-Awsat, a London-based Arab daily newspaper, reported that the Indian Army has played an "active role in providing relief to hundreds of families." Riad Ahmad from Tanghdar village near the border that separates the Indian and the Pakistani Kashmir, told Asharq Al-Awsat, "Seven of my family members were killed and no one helped me but the Indian soldiers. They helped me to pull out the dead bodies from underneath the rubble, preparing the coffins and burying the dead."

Similar reports came from the village of Jblah, where all residents praised the kindness of Indian soldiers for providing food and shelter to afflicted families. One villager said, "We will remember this forever."

Al Jazeera television reported on Oct. 17 that that Islamabad had agreed to allow Indian military planes to help in the rescue efforts as long as the pilots are not Indian. The agreement coincided with the arrival of the third cargo of Indian aid to the Pakistani part of Kashmir.

Pakistan was probably humbled into accepting aid from its nuclear enemy and neighbor, partially due to the lack of international response. The Pakistani government announced that it will need $5 billion to rebuild what the earthquake destroyed. But it only got a half billion dollars promised from foreign donors, most of which have not yet arrived.

Arab media compared the level of international response to other international catastrophes, like Hurricane Katrina in the United States and the tsunami in Asia, and saw a discrepancy. The October 19 issue of Asharq Al-Awsat, for example, showed a cartoon of a fat man in a suit and tie, representing Western countries, with one long arm extending towards Hurricane Katrina and a very short arm pointing towards Pakistan. While the right eye of the man was open towards Katrina, the left eye was shut toward the Pakistani earthquake.

In the October 27 issue of Al-Quds Al-Arabi, a London-based newspaper that covers race and ethnic news, United Nations aid coordinator Rashead Kabear told the newspaper that the number of people who are dying after the earthquake will be larger than those who died during it. He warned that rescue efforts are in a race against time. A few hours before a 65-country summit was held to discuss the earthquake, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan was widely quoted by the Arab press as saying that "three million men, women and children are without shelter and many of them sleep in the open." Many feared that people will die if they do not get blankets before the end of November due to the very cold temperature.

Al-Quds also quoted Oxfam's Head of Advocacy, Phil Bloomer, criticizing some rich countries for not giving more money quickly, saying that although the European Union gave money and promised to give more, some European countries did not give a cent. The countries Bloomer singled out were Belgium, France, Austria, Finland, Greece, and Spain*.

Bloomer added, "Governments meeting in Vienna should put their hands in their pockets and pay their fair share."

The urgency of the situation compelled Fahmi Huwidi, a commentator of Asharq Al-Awsat, to urge Muslim leaders to call on people to prioritize sending money to the afflicted families in Kashmir over spending it on Al Haj, the pilgrimage to Mecca. Huwidi also said that the situation would not be as grave if Muslim charity organizations were not targeted in the framework of the war on terrorism.

"Following September 11, the U.S. was compelled to launch an international campaign against all Islamic charity organizations, wherever they were," he wrote. "Their officials were persecuted, their funds were frozen, and their Headquarters were closed."

Many were accused of supporting terrorism, he also noted, which impeded many from donating money.

* Oxfam Head Phil Bloomer did criticize these countries for not offering aid; however, ReliefWeb notes that these countries have given aid, though the amounts are not mentioned. We regret the confusion.

Digg!

Jalal Ghazi monitors and translates Arab media for New America Media (a project of PNS) and Link TV.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
International Aid for Pakistan Quake
Posted by: lka49 on Nov 2, 2005 12:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to know what is the extent of aid provided my Islamic countries for the quake victims of Pakistan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Suprises
Posted by: UKGray on Nov 2, 2005 3:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a massive feeling of resentment towards Islam in the West - hardly surprising really. In the UK the BBC make every effort to defuse the incorrectly named "Islamaphobia" by making every effort to not mention the word Muslim or Islam in the same sentence as terror - and our leaders visit Muslim community leaders to tell us that terrorism and Islam are two different things. Unfortunately, the man in the street doesn't agree - he sees the two as one and the same and this is for two reasons:

1. Distain - Islam is perceived in the UK as a religion that preaches intolerance (misogyny and homophobia) and engenders extremism and isolationism.

2. Visible Rejection of Al Qaeda – While buses and tubes in London explode and people in Iraq suffer wave upon wave of hateful attacks, the Islamic community in the UK sits quiet because, the man in the street can only assume, they secretly salute these activities or, at best, think they are wrong but deserved. British working class and middle class have a history of campaigning (CND – Pro Palestine – Poll Tax – May Day etc) and, rightly or wrongly, see an absence of any response from the Islamic community as complicity and support for the dreadful actions of the terrorists.

Al Qaeda has achieved its first end, to set the Muslim world and the Western world against each other on lines of faith and race, and, horrifying as it is, this is why there is so little public concern for the earthquake victims. This malady won't be resolved until there is a visible anti-terroism or pacifism movement amongst Muslims worldwide and the Islamic community will bear the consequences until they take this action.

Personally, I find the whole thing heart breaking, but I cannot understand the inaction of the Muslim community as much as a I cannot understand the people who see this natural disaster as some sort of Karma (a view also widely bandied about post-Katrina). We should all pray for some Gandhi/Mandela of the East, and when they arrive we should move heaven and earth to help them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please check your sources
Posted by: TD on Nov 2, 2005 4:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was angry to read that Belgium didn't provide money for the relief of victims. These links provides sums and equipment provided by Belgium.
page_5763_376259.shtml

page_5763_381314.shtml
Belgian Foreign Office's press release:

An additional EUR 1 million in emergency aid for Pakistan awarded via the International Red Cross

The media you cited is probably one of these dedicated to the propagation of hate against Occident.
We help anybody, muslim or not, despite the hate of islamists.
Please check your sources. I will be very skeptic towards Alternet now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Funny, even with the quake, terrorism is still bound to exist over there
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 2, 2005 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny that the Indian government is slow to respond while Israel would have already smashed Pakistan. Normally, I wouldn't take the side of using military force so quick but given the attacks in New Delhi, I can only wonder how far those politicians will stretch their patience before they become a laughing stock of incompetence. And don't expect the quake to stop the muslim fundamentalists, not to be confused with honest and decent Muslims, from continuing their terror attacks in Kashmir for long. Foreign policy by most governments indirectly but pathetically dictates that only those who supposedly pull themselves up the most even if it involves cheating or terrorism deserves the aid so don't be surprised if, say, Al Quaida and bin Laden were to cash in on it with success. Of course, I don't think the U.S. government can or will be able to control the terrorism over there regardless of who's in power unless we literally leave Pakistan alone by cutting down on the military and financial aid. That alone would be major relief to the innocent victims.

P.S.: I heard that more terrorists got killed in the quake over there so maybe there's hope for some peaceful unity and cure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Recently on BBC
Posted by: JasonMR on Nov 2, 2005 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first line of the article says "Viewed through the lens of Arab media", so why do you blame AlterNet TD?

Besides, this will certainly not inspire to help.

It is astonishing, how much air-time Katrina had in non-USA-western-nations, compared with the earthquake in Pakistan. How can one be suprised of western relief responses, with so little media attention.

Sad that our Muslim community members have to remind us of this.

Regarding muslim condemnation of terrorist attacks, are we going to start summing up, how many citizens of the western world spoke out against USA led agression, and compare that number with how many followers of the Muslim belief system condemned terrorist attacts?

Perception and reality are two different things!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Recently on BBC Posted by: UKGray
sacre_vache
Posted by: sacre_vache on Nov 2, 2005 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what are the Arab countries doing for quake relief in Pakistan? Given the amount of petrodollars some of these countries are awash with these days, surely they should be in the forefront of the relief efforts than the western governments and NGOs. Sounds like sour grapes to me. And considering the fact how much of the aid given is diverted by bureaucrats for their own use in countries such as Pakistan and India, I would be a bit chary as to the disposition of the aid supplies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where is Osama?
Posted by: badkitty on Nov 2, 2005 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have two comments. First, my father (he has the money in the family) did not donate to tsunami or Katrina relief, but he did send $300 to the UN for the Pakistani earthquake relief. We felt that everybody donated to those other causes and weren't happy with what we read about relief efforts (reconstruction in both places looks like a corporate giveaway to us), but we felt the money was really needed by the Pakistanis, since there was no mob response to this disaster. Second, the weekend this earthquake happened I started wondering what the CIA was doing. Surely this earthquake took place near where Bin Laden is supposed to be (northwest Pakistan, right?) but we have not seen one word on his location or possible survival or death. My guess is the CIA is looking like mad, but maybe I'm wrong. Has anyone heard of his whereabouts since the earthquake?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most Tsunami Victims Are Muslims...
Posted by: belogorsky on Nov 2, 2005 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately this is too typical of Arab/Middle Eastern mainstream. Blame everyone (i.e. The West) but themselves for their problems. Saudi Arabia spends billions to build Madrasses in Pakistan - why can't they afford several billion for quake relief? You can see where their priorities are.

Also, last time I checked, most of the victims of last year's tsunami were Muslims from Indonesia. The recovery effort there was obviously far from perfect, but it's an undisputed fact that many citizens from the West donated huge sums of money for the relief. The difference now is that many victims are located in remote, hostile areas, where media coverage is naturally limited. Westerners are not getting as vivid of a picture of the destruction as they did with the tsunami. More importantly, the ethnic and religious politics of the damaged areas are undoubtedly complicating the relief effort. So perhaps the Arab press can start talking about that first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sharonsj
Posted by: sharonJ on Nov 2, 2005 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What international aid for Katrina victims? I'm an American and as far as I know only Americans are paying for this. As for aid to the Pakistani quake victims, where are the other 21 Muslim countries? You never hear much from the Arab media about what they are doing to help fellow Arabs; it's easier to blame all the non-Muslims.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sharonsj Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: Sharonsj Posted by: whitis
» RE: Sharonsj Posted by: polyquats
Caught with our pockets 1/2 empty
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Nov 2, 2005 12:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ordinarily we might have been more generous, but with the tsunami, Katrina + 2, our ill-conceived adventures in Iraq, tax breaks for the wealthy and for corporations, cronyism, no-bid contracts for our favored contractors and a feeding frenzy for oil comapnies, we are already spending the inheritance of our children and their children as well.

We have the biggest deficits in history right now and are hardly able to pay for our own unexpected expenses. But that's because we have leaders that ignore the news and feel that they can 'create their own reality'. I almost suspect that our divinely annointed leader was certain that no major disasters would happen on his watch. Apparently, they actually thought we could just decide that we wouldn't need to protect N.O. until we finished God's work hunting down enemies, real or imaginary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Help for Muslims
Posted by: Campesino on Nov 2, 2005 12:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I realize I am echoing earlier comments, but most of the tsunami victims were Indonesian Muslims. Also no one seems to ever remember that the NATO effort in the Balkans saved tens of thousands of Muslims from ethnic cleansing.

Media coverage of the earthquakes isn't anything like the hurricane coverage here - it didn't happen here - but I see it on the media every day.

These are silly complaints

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Help for Muslims Posted by: ALANHESTER
This clearly illustrates just how messed up the world really is.
Posted by: syn7hor on Nov 2, 2005 3:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The pakistani people would need $5 billion to rebuild it's country. They were granted $0.5 billion, but even that seems like a lot. We're talking about saving the lives of hundreds of thousands here.

On the other hand there are people like Niklas Zennström (founder of Skype) who now has a personal wealth of (atleast) $1 billion.
AM I MISSING SOMETHING HERE?! WHY ON EARTH ARE WE ALLOWING THIS TO HAPPEN?!

If a reporter were to call Zennström, congratulate him on that amazing deal, and ask him the following: "You have heard about the earthquake in Pakistan right? Did you know that 100's of 1000' of children might die this winter, simply because noone is willing to help them. How about you save AN ENTIRE COUNTRY? How about you settle for $50 million and save all those people? Would you be willing to live with only $50 million or is that too huge a sacrifice for you?"
Obviously he would deny to offer any money, but how would he motivate that? Am I being childish and naive here? Why aren't the media all over issues like this?

Why don't we just STEAL Zennströms money? I find it morally disgusting not to. What am I missing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]