Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Democrats Fiddling as the World Burns

By Jan Frel, AlterNet. Posted November 1, 2005.


Bush is at the nadir of his career and the entire Republican Party is a sinking ship. Why aren't we getting more than weak slogans from the Washington Dems?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Jan Frel

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

By the time Richard Milhous Nixon goes on trial in the Senate, the only real reason for trying him will be to understand how he ever became president of the United States at all ... and the real defendant, at that point, will be the American Political System. -- Hunter S. Thompson, 1973.
The top three political leaders in America are in the legal hot seat.

George Bush's White House has been served with an indictment on five counts against the chief of staff to the Vice President. Tom DeLay's trial is under way. And Bill Frist is the subject of a formal investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission for selling off his family's stock.

And there are more investigations against Republicans lurking just below the surface. Powerful House member Bob Ney is wrapped up tightly with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff; Congressman Randy Cunningham is in bed with a defense contractor; House Republican Richard Pombo, who chairs the House Resources Committee, has gone on travel junkets paid for by a shady private foundation.

Outside of D.C. there's Kentucky Governor Ernie Fletcher, who is going down for having a GOP-only hiring practice. And the Ohio Republican Party has collapsed: Governor Bob Taft has been reprimanded and fined for playing golf on lobbyists' tabs, and big-time donor Tom Noe has been indicted for funneling cash into George Bush's re-election and stealing from the public purse to pour money into his rare coin investments.

Each crime is a fitting symbol of each Republican's particular brand of political criminality: George Bush's team got busted in a smear attempt against an Iraq war opponent -- but the entire case for war was a crime if there ever were one. DeLay's case is about him funneling corporate money to political causes to scorch Texas' political landscape with R's in every district -- but he's done nothing but funnel money from corporations for pork and political advantage every year he's been in Congress. Richard Pombo was found to have taken money from a group funded by whalers, mink farmers and veal barons -- poetic justice for a guy who has tried to sell off our national parks to mining and lumber interests. And so on.

It's time for the Democrats to seize the political advantage, right? Every single political branch in D.C. is on fire. The world is also on fire, or drowning: the American public has clear, massive majority positions on Iraq, Katrina, our $8 trillion national debt, world poverty, $3 gallon gas and rapid climate change. Yet what we've gotten so far from the Democratic leadership is meaningless sloganeering.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and power-hungry Hillary Clinton's big rhetorical banner for 2006 -- as good an indicator to the Democrats' predictions of where all this scandal and disaster is going to take them in the next election as any -- is, America Can Do Better.

Here's where I part from those who have taken the time to criticize the D.C. Democrats for such a feckless response. Step back and look at the political climate for a moment before passing judgment on America Can Do Better. The legal investigations listed above have been the driving engine of the political process for months now. Political advantage is currently determined by the ups and downs of pending cases; we're bringing the courts into the political process on a comprehensive scale far beyond what we saw with Ken Starr in the '90s -- a trend that, if treated by political leaders as appropriate politics, as the Roman historian Tacitus attested, is proof of a deceased republic.

Democrats and their partisan supporters are relying on prosecutors to do what they couldn't at the ballot box. Patrick Fitzgerald would not be in the spotlight today if John Kerry hadn't been such a squeamish collaborator in our rush to war in Iraq, and such an unrepentant coward leading up to the 2004 election (and he still is a year later).

And there's a price to pay for making prosecutors like Fitzgerald the hero of the moment; it gives further incentive for the Democratic Party in Washington, wraith of the New Deal coalition that it is, to languish and let legal investigations do their "work" for them.

America Can Do Better is the fitting and perfect motto for the Democratic political class. What's sillier are the expectations of slogans about Iraq, corporations or the environment, given the sick state of our political system. This hasn't been lost on the public, which, despite giving an approval rating of 40 percent to congressional Republicans during these months of scandal, gives the opposition a rating that hovers under 50. Is it fair to expect that the public will view Scooter Libby as simply a Bush-serving Republican villain when it comes to light that he was a lawyer for Clinton pardonee Marc Rich?

What if, magically, we were able to investigate and prosecute George Bush for lying us into Iraq, as many have called for? Not only do the congressional Republicans who abetted him deserve investigation, so do the Democrats and previous White House administrations, which are complicit in this too. We've been driving Iraq into the ground for 14 years. Bush's Iraq policies picked up the torch from the Clinton foreign policy team, which in turn took its pointers from the staff of George H.W. Bush.

As AlterNet's recent editorial on the 2,000th U.S. combat death in Iraq argued, the number of deaths in that country was far higher during Bill Clinton's eight years: "[The death totals in Iraq since Bush's invasion] are dwarfed by the number of dead -- by some estimates over a million -- caused by the U.N sanctions that started with Bush I, and continued under President Bill Clinton, whose Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, once described the effects of the sanctions on Iraq's children as 'worth it.'"

Scott Ritter, former U.N. weapons inspector for Iraq's weapons programs, recently spoke in a public forum about the U.S. crimes done to Iraq: "This is about a failure of not only the Bush Administration but of the United States of America, and we have to look in the mirror and recognize that, well, all the Bush Administration did is take advantage of a systemic failure on the part of the United States as a whole, a failure that not only involves the executive, but it involves the legislative branch, Congress."

We're at a moment in D.C. just like the one that Hunter Thompson saw in 1973 -- nothing has really changed. Are we going to wonder how Scooter Libby and Tom DeLay got away with their crimes, or how they got where they are in the first place?

If we pick the former, then, yeah, America can do better. If we go with the latter, we're going to start talking about how corruption isn't a measure of how much a politician steals from the purse or breaks the law, but rather the degree of civic apathy. We'll talk about how it's insane that we have a 218-year-old Constitution that has been little more than amended (Thomas Jefferson suggested we completely rewrite it every 20 years), and an equally ancient federal instrument that has ballooned but not evolved with the country's rapid expansion in size and population and major technological advances.

And we'll surely discuss the danger that centralized power has not only for the health of a republic but our own safety. As Thompson observed, it's the American political system that deserves a trial. Let us be the jury and the judge.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Jan Frel is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Democrats
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 1, 2005 1:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is why I left the Democratic Party five years ago (and, no, it's not pronounced "Democrat" Party - man, that annoys me). When they nominated an empty suit named Al Gore over Bill Bradley in the summer of 2000, that was the last straw. I felt at the time that I was safe casting a protest vote for Ralph Nader because George W. Bush was obviously so stupid that the voters would never send him to the White House. I underestimated two things: 1. The incompetence of the Gore campaign and 2. The rip-roaring stupidity of the average American voter.

The Democrats have got to get together and formulate a positive message. Not a feel-good, pie in the sky, everythings coming up roses message. Not a "vote for us 'cause we're not them" message. But a strong, no-nonsense, 2005 version of the Contract With America minus the bullshit. They must be honest and emphasize the sacrifices that'll have to be made by every citizen. Yes it can be done. In the summer of 1960 Jack Kennedy made personal sacrifice the cornerstone of not only his acceptance speech at the democratic convention, but of his inaugural address six months later. The tidal wave of human excrement that comprises the administration of George W. Bush has looted our national treasure to such a point that the social and economic infrastructure of this country is in danger of collapsing. Sacrifices will have to be made particularly by the people (read: richest two percent) who benefited the most from the looting to begin with.

Dang! We do live in interesting times, don't we?

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Democrats Posted by: Angellight
» RE: The Democrats Posted by: Rod in 83706
» RE: The Democrats Posted by: beetruetoyou
» What is their problem? Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: The Democrats Posted by: peacearmy
» RE: The Democrats Posted by: alternetleslie
» RE: The Democrats Posted by: lbullot@westerngas.com
» RE: The Democrats Posted by: Charaud
» to Charley Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: The Democrats Re: Charaud Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: The Democrats Posted by: User
» RE: The Democrats Posted by: GreenLibbie
America Can't Do Better
Posted by: LMNOP on Nov 1, 2005 3:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What makes anyone think that this pathetic excuse for a people and a culture can do better? As Tom has already said in the post above this one, the American people are mind numbingly stupid. If that were all, I would pity them and want to help them. But they are also arrogant, rude, selfish and violent, and I have come to despise them over the last many years. I was born among them and I still live among them, but I disavow them.

They can't assemble a decent liberal party because that would require a density of integrity and intelligence just not to be found here. What the American people can do very well, however, as the world has seen, is to assemble a party that can lie and steal.

The best thing that could happen to the American people most certainly will, and that is, a great humiliation and an economic and political correction. It would be disgusting for such a country to continue to prosper, and it has no business pretending to be a moral example or a world leader. It is just a bully now, and the bigger they are, the harder they fall.

God bless America? Hardly.

Proud to be an American? No, deeply ashamed and disappointed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: Pepper
» Fair enough Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: Ellie1
» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: beetruetoyou
» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: Pepper
» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: churchofone
» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: Ellie1
» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: blueneck
» Hello again Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: Hello again Posted by: pacto
» Bird flu martial law Posted by: jwg
» Reforms Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: churchofone
» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: Jean Jearman
» Thank you Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: sykotropix
» RE: America Can't Do Better Posted by: sidewinder
I guess we really do have to start thinking outside the box.
Posted by: Pepper on Nov 1, 2005 4:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FIRST, you have to accept that the system as we know it is so BROKEN it can't be fixed. SECOND, you have to begin to accept that something will be needed to be in place to replace it if we are to control it (the American people), and THIRD, we have to start thinking outside the box. We have to over come our "cognitive dissonance" and realize the world is changed forever and it doesn't match what we were raised to believe is how we are to live and function in this society and government.

Once we do that, we can accurately view our new world and make plans and actions toward achieving dominion over it. We can develop elements to fit with such concepts as "sustainable communities". We can begin to bond with each other again to aid and assist in living in this new reality. The sense of community has been lost (how is another discussion).

We must rid ourselves of the leeches who are controlling the current reality and are perpetuating its lingering death (our politicians). We must start locally, find our own leaders within our groups and begin the process of building a world within that totally ignores the world without. These are just some ideas, I am sure as more people discuss what needs to be done, other will come up with great, creative ideas. Finally, when all is in place then we would have to finalize this with "civil disobedience" by depriving the system of their resources to continue it by not paying our taxes to the gov, rather into a trust fund for the "people" controlled by their real elected local representatives.

I am not saying I know how this should look, only that it needs to look different than what we have now, heaven forbid. Its beyond redemption I am afraid.

I would like to begin looking at this like " a new adventure" and that these are exciting times for REAL honest to gosh change. Lets begin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's roll
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 1, 2005 4:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article has it right. The system needs a good overhaul, but don't expect the politicians to do it. Both parties are controlled by the Establishment and a third party can't win. This is not necessarily a conspiracy, but powerful groups whose goals are not in the interest of the ordinary person have taken over. Everybody knows the problems, campaign finance, corporations are out of control, politicians don't work for the people, and on and on. It is up to the people to take control of the government. I believe that it can be done before the 2006 election. Go to a new idea
PS If anyone expert in Java Script would lend a hand I would appreciate it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let's roll Posted by: drone
» RE: Let's roll Posted by: qrswave
» RE: Let's roll Posted by: Laurenk
PEPSI or COKE
Posted by: dadanbetty on Nov 1, 2005 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The democrats are even more guilty than the republicans because they know better. The rebublicans are just evil, stupid, greedy, and wicked and they remind us of this everyday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: PEPSI or COKE Posted by: qrswave
Michael
Posted by: comm97 on Nov 1, 2005 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rulers of our country have their party. Nader refered to it as a dulopathy, We can call it theirs. We have ours. It is the Labor Party. The program speaks to the needs of the working class, employed and unemployed.
Michael
comm97@earthlink.net
Michigan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Michael Posted by: drone
Dems Need a NEGATIVE Message
Posted by: henryclay on Nov 1, 2005 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doesn't anyone remember the early 90s? When Newt Gingrich and Tom Delay and every other right-wing Republican would leap onto the House floor to blast "The Democrat Party" for corruption, capitulation, cronyism, and on and on into the late hours of the night...with only a C-SPAN camera for company.

Dems, if they are to avoid another crushing defeat next year, have to take the offensive now, with a withering negative message. There is so much to attack. The Republicans have littered the political playing field with dozens of scandals and nightmares...from Katrina to Iraq to Libby to Noe to Frist to Delay and on and on. Every political brain, from Rove to Carville, will tell you: Negative ads work. Just ask John Kerry, if he's even bothered to figure out what truck hit him a year ago this week.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» sounds positive to me! Posted by: beetruetoyou
Democrats? What a Joke!
Posted by: cellis56 on Nov 1, 2005 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When not one Democratic Senator stood up to support the black caucus protesting the disenfranchisement of Florida's African American voters following the first Dubya electoral debacle, it should have become clear to anyone with a doubt that the Democratic Party of FDR and even of Harry Truman was long dead. Cowardice and self-aggrandizement are the earmarks of all politics in 21st Century America.

There are not two parties, although a handful of idealistic hopefuls in the House continue to play political ball with people they should avoid (including Barbara Lee who alternately thrills and disappoints).

Without a new party, the American electorate cannot expect to escape the clutches of the church/state/corporate triumvirate, not to mention the military industrial complex of Dwight Eisenhower. We are slaves to the market we so adore and the market is the last resting place of freedom. Although, of course, the so-called "free market" is just one more marketing ruse of greedy crooks with their tentacles deep into both parties.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The socio-economic "correction" is coming
Posted by: nosylae on Nov 1, 2005 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a reply to some previous threads - the huge market correction is coming! For sure it will wake everybody up, but by then it will be too late.

In the year 2016 the first of the babyboomers will be required to start cashing out their 401(k)s. Around the same time, it is estimated that social security will be bankrupt, we will run out of fossil fuels and China will overtake us as the world's biggest economy.

Do you think that the Democratic Party gives a rat's ass?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Democrats are not lame
Posted by: lproyect on Nov 1, 2005 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I keep hearing on liberal blogs and websites that the Democrats are spineless. This is not the case at all. They always fight for their principles. For example, Clinton went to the mat to push NAFTA through. They have also demonstrated an impressive sticktoitiveness on the question of Iraq. They were for the war at the beginning. They are for it now, even if it means going against the grain of the desires of the American people. I have no trouble understanding the Democrats at all. What I don't understand is how outlets like the Nation Magazine, AlternNet and CommonDreams keep rallying around such a warmongering and pro-corporate party. I assume it is because they are funded by the same millionaires who funded Kerry's campaign and who will fund Hillary Clinton's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressive Democrats
Posted by: Shakti on Nov 1, 2005 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, we don't have the luxury of decades to build up a third party that could actually win the White House. A better solution, in my opinion, is to start championing the true progressives in the Democratic Party: Boxer, Conyers, McKinney, Slaughter, Kucinich, Obama ... I think these people deserve our support.

As for Gore ... I am a strong Gore supporter. I think people underestimate the conservative/corporate resistance to the Clinton/Gore administration ... it is not as if the office of the president is so powerful that it can easily stand up to transnationals. I also think people overestimated the power of the office of the VP. Check out Gore's recent speeches. True, he did not fight very hard for his presidency, and this was a mistake. But Gore is smart, progressive, and actually makes a lot of sense if you stop to listen to what he says. The media did a real number on Gore during the election ... totally unfair coverage. Gore is definitely not an "empty suit." Anyone who thinks so should read Earth in the Balance.

There is a progressive caucus within the Democratic Party, and this seems to be our best bet. Turning on the Democrats as a whole is self-defeating, and plays into the hands of the Republicans by throwing away our votes on third party candidates that cannot hope to win a national election, at this stage. Green Party for local elections? Great. But we won't get a Green into the WH for the foreseeable future. We need another plan for that.

They are not all alike -- the Clinton/Gore administration seems like paradise compared to the Bush/Cheney administration, does it not? Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well said! but.... Posted by: beetruetoyou
» RE: Well said! but.... Posted by: churchofone
» RE: Progressive Democrats Posted by: folkdude01
» Obama's voting record and "rhetoric" Posted by: beetruetoyou
» RE: Progressive Democrats Posted by: liberalibrarian
Bolivia vs the IMF and won no privatization of their water how? Strike
Posted by: alternetleslie on Nov 1, 2005 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Corporations need to know the aggregation of all of us has the money and the power, not them. We need to flex our muscles where it hurts them. We need to show the corporate owned politicians who runs the capitalist materialist show. Remember Bush's first advice after 911? Go shop! That is the vulnerable underbelly. Hit them where it hurts, their financial statement. We need a national strike with all of us taking to the street in a peaceful demonstration. The IMF loaned poor Bolivia lots of money, then when they could not pay it back, they demanded the Bolivian water supply be no longer public, but privatized. Want to pay for water like you pay for gasoline? Nope, neither did they, so they shut everything down and went on strike and the people of Bolivia won!!! If we don't buy their products, if we don't do their work, they will understand, that they need us more than we need them. Are we so spoiled, are our values so skewed that we can't do sacrific for the bigger picture? This takes planning, so let's get started. Get all the organizations, doing their own thing, tko stop the redundancy of their efforts, and resources, both monetary and human, and join together in our own Solidarity - you remember Poland's success!, working together for one common goal -- what a powerful force!!! Tell the corporations, the politicians, the media, we won't take their crap anymore and we need a specific change. So let's get communicating with every organization you know, like Moveon, True Majority, Common Cause, Sierra Club, Union of Scientists, NOW, everyone you can remember on every front. We have been fighting little battles on every front, divided and conquered, but we need to unite and win the big war, and its not in Iraq, it is right here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bolivia... Yes! Yes! Yes! Posted by: rockpicker
In 1984 the Democratic Party ceased to exist
Posted by: sausage on Nov 1, 2005 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What an ironic twist of history that Al From founded the Democratic Leadership Council in the year made infamous by George Orwell's novel of that title.

I invite you to vist Third Way.com, the DLC's pathetic attempt at hijacking, devaluing and smearing the word "progressive".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No one wants to change...but here are some solutions
Posted by: mama_jess on Nov 1, 2005 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's argue about differences between the Repugs/Demoncrats all we like, but there isn't much difference. The bigger problem is that we can see the problems(poverty, war, injustice, environmental destruction, etc), but we don't truly want a solution. And I'm talking about almost everyone in this country, especially the "liberals" and "progressives" who spend so much time reading of and reacting to the horrors our govm't, and more importantly, our way of life, have imposed on the world. How many of you still drive your cars to work each day? Anyone composting their food waste, or better yet, their human waste? Do you know what's going to be on TV tonight? Do you still buy stuff made in China(which you don't need) from national chains, and food from a thousand miles away? How many of you have a woodstove in your house to heat with?
I include myself in this group, those who see the problems in our society, but can't make the leap to really living in a healthier way. I'm not saying that it's easy to live in this way, or even possible all of the time. But the idea that you stick a "Food not Bombs" sticker on your Chevy Blazer and think you're doing well is ridiculous. Or that recycling makes you a better person (it just makes you feel like a better person...try making purchases that don't require recycling, like canning local tomatoes in jars that are reusable, or buying bulk to reduce packaging waste).
Until the idea of waste becomes ridiculous to us, until demand for renewable sources of energy and public transportation creates an economy that values such things, until we, as progressives, start truly walking the path of righteousness(and coopting that word from nuts who never act like Christ), we won't see any valuable, sustainable changes in our society or government. We can wail about corporations having all the power, but in the end they have the power because we buy in, and because we don't represent an alternative to buying in.
That being said, I'm pessimistic about seeing a strong movement in this country towards sustainability. We all have it too easy(even those of us without much, compared to how much of the world lives, are living the "good" life), and we're conditioned to think that we deserve what we have, and that we have to fight to protect what we have. I see more chance of the economic "correction" talked about in previous posts. I think it's going to take a lot of hard lessons to reeducate this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Both are true. And more Posted by: LMNOP
Great Crimes and Misdemeanors
Posted by: robbi on Nov 1, 2005 7:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is no one paying attention to the Great Crime of 2004 in Ohio? Because Americans have lost any bit of interest in history and politics. They have been lured by "entertainment" -- whether from TV or Ipods or video games or anything that doesn't involve the mind. Americans are passive and easily bored. That's why the younger they are, the more they talk on cell phones. Sitting alone and thinking or reading is just plain boring to them. They have to be stimulated every moment of every day just to get through life.

I guess Bush's crimes and those of his cronies are just too boring to deal with. Maybe we do need a draft !! By the way, where are Bush's sweet lovely daughters? One of them promised to teach "underprivileged" children. Maybe her grandmother told her what that word means and the legacy college "graduate" changed her mind. How boring !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bush daughter Posted by: BlueTigress
risingphoenix
Posted by: risingphoenix on Nov 1, 2005 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
huh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We Are Responsible
Posted by: combatboots84 on Nov 1, 2005 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We, Americans, do have problems in our country, as does every other group of people around the world. Our fix won't magically come from an individual, or even a group, in our government (local, state, or federal).
Our fix will come from us, the individual people, if it comes at all. Our problems have come from us, and our present and future will remain disgraceful unless we, as individuals, communities, states, and a country, make it otherwise.
It's up to us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

who's really to blame?
Posted by: bassman on Nov 1, 2005 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dennis kucinich proved that our problems are caused by the stupidity of the american voter, and not by a lack of good choices (the usual argument for a third party). i pray that when primary time comes again, registered democrats will vote for the candidate best qualified to be president, as oppose to basing their decision solely on who they think can win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: who's really to blame? Posted by: Pocahontas
» RE: who's really to blame? Posted by: Basenjis
Totalitarianism or Bust
Posted by: rabblerowzer on Nov 1, 2005 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Totalitarianism or Bust

The Rabid Right has a huge psychological advantage over democrats which they wield like a club to beat democratic politicians into submission: it’s called Mutually Assured Destruction. Rather than risk civil strife, much less civil war, democrats will capitulate to totalitarianism to keep the peace.

Since congressmen make a $165,000 per year, they apparently think they can weather totalitarianism without to much discomfort. Perhaps they can, but for the rest of us, things are going to get really ugly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why the Democrats don't do more than slogans
Posted by: Paul Cardwell on Nov 1, 2005 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Simple. They are owned by the same corrupt corporations that own the Republicans. The only salvation is to bombard the media with demands that they stop censoring and start covering other parties. The Greens of today are what the Democrats were under Sam Rayburn, yet no one is permitted to know what they support in today's world, not even the Four Pillars that all 83 Green Parties in the world must support: grassroots democracy, economic justice, environmental responsibility, and nonviolence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"As Thompson Went, So Will Go America?"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 1, 2005 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, America can do better. So why don't we?

Because – to quote a favorite Bush phrase – "it's hard work." We have to tear ourselves away from our I-Pods, our cell-phone blathering, our celebrity worship, and all the other petty, meaningless media-generated straw-man "issues," and actually THINK! I know that it's painful, but if we as amercans do not open up and really understand what is happening to us, and who is doing us in, then there is no hope for this nation; we might as well just turn it over to Wal-Mart. It is sad and particularly frightening that we have not progressed from Hunter S. Thompson's 1973 America. We've had 32 years to learn to be better, and we've blown it; let's just hope that America's fate doesn't follow that of Thompson's.

I'll say again what I've said in this forum for a long time: I suspect that the fix is in, and that there is no difference between the parties as far as who is paying their freight. The phony differences are now just enough to keep us off balance, to keep us all dancing to the same worn-out music, while behind the scenes, corporations call the tune.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm joining the Green Party....
Posted by: Alexandra on Nov 1, 2005 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have given up on the Democratic Party as well. With the exception of a (very) few Democrats, they are no longer real progressives. Every time they have had an opportunity to stand up for what's right, they have failed, especially in regard to the invasion of Iraq.

It seems to me the only true progressive party in this country is the Green Party. Yes, I know - a third party, a 'wasted vote' in some people's minds. But I simply cannot in good conscience vote Democratic anymore. It's time for real positive change, and to me, the Green Party is it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm joining the Green Party.... Posted by: liberalibrarian
Dems have no spine
Posted by: lamar on Nov 1, 2005 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tend to agree with the above post. The Democratic party is no longer progressive. It's mired in the left wing versions of the same corruption seen in the current White House. At least the right takes a stand and doesn't back down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hand in hand, time to stand!
Posted by: rockpicker on Nov 1, 2005 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.worldcantwait.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This why I can't give the Dems cash anymore.
Posted by: P M Donovan on Nov 1, 2005 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a life long registered Democrat party member who has been watching the current inaction since November 2000. At that time, I had hoped that boring ole Gore would return some integrity to the White House. His collapse in the face of the Bush coup was disheartening. The collapse of the whole Democratic party in light of the subsequent lies, corruption, and moral penury of the Bush administration and the Republican party has left me stunned. Where have the New Dealers gone? Where have the '60s marchers gone? Don't know, myself. I'm just stunned and the Party's not getting a cent until they start acting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I think you're right Posted by: AdamSelene11726
Why are we surprised?
Posted by: SonnyDr on Nov 1, 2005 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I laugh everytime I read that people are upset about what the Democratic party does day in and day out. what do you expect from a party that is completely sold out to corporate interests? You think they will do anything different? Hillary is pushing for more troops - Is she smoking CRACK??? Most of America doesn't even want this war anymore, how come the dems are talking about more troops?? Cause they are beholding to the same greedy bastards that control the Republican party.

The sad truth about America is we allow corporations to buy off senators, governors, congressman and the president - everyone is for sale. Now Corporations even instill their own into our government (Cheney), how we can ever expect laws to benefit most Americans? Laws are here only to benefit the bottom line. It doesn't get passed me that of every lousy selection that Bush has made for a government position the only one in which he really picks a qualified person is the Federal Reserve. Who controls America???

What else can you say to explain how corporations set up account in the Caymans and not get reprimanded? how can you explain corporations like energy companies writing the energy bill or the clear skies initiative? How do you explain American companies producing sneakers in China for 50 cent a pair and they charge us here 140 dollars. Now I'm not saying all corporations are bad, cause that isn't true. But we have let corporations run amok in America.

And in this global market, those corporations can easily skip out of the US if the economy here goes bad - where will that leave us? We can't expect nothing from Republicans nor democrats - cause our system has sold them to the highest bidder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why are we surprised? Posted by: SonnyDr
Slogan: "America Can Do Better"
Posted by: Joe on Nov 1, 2005 10:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the hell kind of a slogan is "America Can Do Better". It says nothing about Democrats and shouldn't that be the point. Although, it doesn't suprise me one bit that the Democrats came up with this meaningless slogan. Does it mean "Ameican Can Do Better" with Better Republicans, "America Can Do Better" with Better Democrats (true), "America Can Do Better" on the job, what the hell does it mean. Pathetic!!!!

The Democrat party is about as exciting as water. I even find water more facinating with the differing filtering methods.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

text of banned radio ad, check this out!
Posted by: rockpicker on Nov 1, 2005 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, this is Boots Riley from The Coup.

The world can't wait to drive out the Bush Regime.

November 2, no work, no school.
We gonna march. Join us. 12 noon at Union Square.
Come on, you seen the pictures.
Bush made torture into a sport and justifies it.
You saw Iraq destroyed by a war based on lies.
We all watched Bush leave people to die in New Orleans and treat people like criminals.
This regime is what's criminal.
The Bush Regime is out to remake the world.
Unending war, a devastated environment, forced religion, no right to abortion, no dissent, no critical thought.
We have to stop this now. If we don't we will be forced to accept it.
The future we get is up to us.
The beginning of the end of the Bush Regime starts Wednesday November 2.
Join us at 12 noon at Union Square.

Check it out www.worldcantwait.org or Call 866-973-4463

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Communicate or DIE!!
Posted by: janvdb on Nov 1, 2005 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dem "leaders" need to communicate with the masses. As long as the "corporate media" controlls the message, America will never have a viable left wing. We have allowed capitalistic principals to control ALL our media. Media is too precious and public to sell off to the highest bidder. It's our common BRAIN out there.

In Europe and Japan (the rest of the civilized world, say) public media is still big. Look at England -- BBC is still astride the airwaves and our public television uses their material. And, they still have a viable left-wing.

Whatever happened to the idea of the Democratic Party itself putting up a cable TV channel of its own? COMMUNICATE!!

Did the Democratic Party even contribute toward or help with Air America? No, they waited for "private parties" to do that. The vacuum was so intense that it immediately took off, to the amazement of propogandized Dem "leaders."

We need to demand that our government make available multiple FREE channels for public access and then we need to insist that our party leaders, think tanks and universities produce content FOR THE MASSES. We have public access TV here in Portland, OR and the Dems don't even use it.

I want a George Soros channel!! Where is the Harvard channel? What are we getting for billions in taxes they don't pay on their huge endowment income due to their tax-exempt status? We are getting dozens of journals which they pretend to "sell" for $125 for an annual subscription (4 slim mags) or which are "available" on line for $25 perarticle.

You can read them in the local university library but you can't check them out like other books.

This is the sum total output of our academic establishment here.

That's crazy. No wonder the rightists can paint the leftwing as demons with impunity -- there is no rebuttal. The left has silenced itself.

The government needs to make the bandwidth available through legislative means and then our progressive forces need to step up to the plate and produce content FOR THE MASSES.

Our Dem "leaders" don't seem to understand that they need to communicate with the entire population -- white trash and all -- or remain a pathetic opposition party for 50 years. It happened in Mexico and Japan and it could happen here.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reality check ready for cashing
Posted by: Wizard of Id on Nov 1, 2005 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, folks, if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. How many of you waste countless hours typing out incensed emails advocating this or that position on some blogspot. To correct some obvious errors caused by too much monitor-fixation:
1.) Americans are not stupid, just ill-informed, poorly-educated, morally simplistic, and apathetic about national politics. There's nothing in our culture than encourages a change, and the patronizing tone of the intelligentsia only encourages the alienation of ordinary men and women from culture/politics.
2.) Democrats are not weak and spineless, they merely lack a coherent vision and strong leadership. This is the inevitable price of a party that embraces diversity and a multiplicity of views - they value freedom of thought over conformity. The Republicans adopt the opposite stance. Which would you prefer, cause you can't have both.
3.) Don't go wishing for some Libertarian/Isolationist reform or rewriting of the Constitution. It's a pipe dream and any sensible person should realize that both the US itself and the world around it are completely interdependent systems.

So, once again, I ask you, what are YOU doing? How about five easy steps to change the world for the better.

1. Stop driving. Walk wherever you can, and if not, take a bus.
2. Spend at least 2 hours a week volunteering for the public good. Work in a soup kitchen, tutor disadvantaged children, whatever, just do something.
3. Get involved in LOCAL politics. That's where change needs to start and one sensible man or women CAN make a difference. School Board meetings are a great place to start - boring as hell, but the line in defense of science and rational education has to be drawn somewhere.
4. Give a little money to _everyone_ who asks, even if it's only a dime. All arguments about encouraging dependance aside, the bottom line is that there is no effective welfare system and the only reason the wealthiest country in the world has people dying on the street is personal greed, pure and simple. You can rationalize it all you want, but at the end of the day, you can still spare it and they can't survive without it.
5. Treat everyone you meet, especially those whom you disagree with most, with respect and tolerance. That was Gandhi's policy and he beat the bloody British Empire.

So, what are you waiting for?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Fiddling Anymore!
Posted by: harpy on Nov 1, 2005 1:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As of this afternoon, the Democrats are demanding answers and finally shaking things up. Maybe they saw the above article!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another view
Posted by: colette on Nov 1, 2005 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though I share many of the frustrations expressed about the performance and timidity of Democratic leaders, I want to point out something crucial: The Republicans got a lethal grip on this country because they united.
If the Harriet Miers flap revealed anything, it was the fissures within the Republican party. Part of their genius, however, is to exert the discipline to rarely air those differences publicly, and to coalesce as one voice when necessary -- especially at the ballot box.
By contrast, Democrats are constantly sniping at one another, rather than projecting a sense of unity despite differences and instead of joining forces quietly and productively behind the scenes.
It's to the point now where when someone like conservative pundit George Wills blathers on about how Republicans have nothing to fear from Democrats because they're so divided, one has to degree.
I think this attitude hurt Gore's campaign in 2000, and Kerry's in 2004. They were imperfect candidates on many counts. But somehow Democrats have forgotten that only coalitions succeed in this huge, highly schismatic country -- and if we had either a Gore or Kerry presidency today, it's hard to conceive we'd be in a quagmire in Iraq or on the verge of seeing Social Security, Medicare and other programs gutted to pay for tax cuts for the mega-rich.
As the playwright Tony Kushner has commented, if we elect an imperfect Democrat, at least Dems will have some power to press him into doing the right thing -- just as the right-wingers have had the leverage to make Bush do their bidding.
But if Democrats keep savaging one another, with even great gusto than they attack Bush & company, I see little prospect of even incremental change in this country

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another view Posted by: crusty
» RE: Another view Posted by: Pepper
So then, Let's make our own catchy phrases.
Posted by: nitsua1023 on Nov 1, 2005 2:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or even some silly or stupid ones if you want. This thread can be for anyone who has a phrase or saying that they think the Dems should latch onto. Here are a couple I use a lot.

The Bush Davidians.
Enron-ocracy.
Whack-a-moles = republicans

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do you guys enjoy being so self-righteous?
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Nov 1, 2005 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right now the Democrats are gearing up to fight the Supreme Court Nomination. They have not appeared oppositional since the nuclear threat, but they will have to use the filibuster. Then all hell will break lose. There many side issues going on in both the House and the Senate. I read many of the weekly newsletter form congressional Democrats as well as this site.

It is very easy to sit out here and say what we would do. We are angry and disappointed; but you have to work to change things. No third party has ever won a the presidential election. I personally will not now think we can afford the risk now. If you want a third party then you start on the grassroots level and work your way up. It will take about 8-12 years to build to a country wide third party. Throwing away your vote will not change anything, except your can feel self-righteous about letting Republicans win once again, because you did not vote to the Democrats. Big Deal, we may not be able to survive these three years, must less another 4 or 8 years of The Republicans. If you do not like things run, then work hard to constructively to change them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe Sen. Reid read this article?
Posted by: launcher on Nov 1, 2005 8:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As of this afternoon (Nov 1), Harry Reid and Senate Democrats initiated a closed-door session to demand the state of (or lack of) investigations conducted on pre-Iraq war intelligence and its possible manipulations by the White House.

Cheers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The "pox on both houses" is the wimp's way out
Posted by: Sojourner on Nov 1, 2005 8:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, I'm talking about myself. In '68, because HHHumphrey was Johnson's gofer on the Vietnam War, I excused myself. Only to watch Tricky Dick turn the US into a country club for corporate CEOs while keeping the war going. Compared to the poor excuses for political leadership since then, HHH was Conan the Barbarian.

We create our leaders. True, not out of nothing. But when you feel some excitement about prospects, trust it. Go with it. How can it possibly get worse than it already is.

I like to moan about the leadership my 60s generation saw get killed. Is there anyone around these days even worth assassinating? We'd better hope so. And when such leadership appears, we'd better hope some of us are willing to take the bullet for them. Nothing less will do. It's long past the time to rock the boat.

Can anyone remember why "A rolling stone gathers no moss"? And a "hard rain gonna fall"? "The times they are a'changin'"?

In those days the Earth shook. It's time for us all to get to the shakin'. Tomorrow, you say? I'll be there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I remember those sayings Posted by: ShaSpirit
Independent
Posted by: Guy on Nov 2, 2005 8:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This also is why I am a registered Independent/Decline to State. The Demos don't represent me and are doing a piss poor job, IMHO. On the other hand, we need a viable opposition party that represents the people and has the good of the country at heart. We're still looking.

Guy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Get Real! Posted by: harpy
» RE: Get Real! Posted by: crusty
print this and post in public places
Posted by: rockpicker on Nov 2, 2005 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Magnetic Ribbons and the Yellowcake of Faith

When we wake puking shame
at last, and know the dream
for sham, embraced en masse...
When bells that rang victorious
hang mute, their tarnished claims
ignored in disrepute, and
bitter sons, having been all they
could be, can't wish back innocence
or the leg below the knee...

(This brash regime's trimmed reason
from its ranks, its black guard
in the street, protecting flanks.)

...then will we heed the schemers'
gloating leer? "There's no future
for any of you here."
Row on row, with hand
in trembling hand, it's come to this.
WE DREAMERS BETTER STAND!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dems = Reps Lite
Posted by: Bigteam on Nov 2, 2005 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason you guys are getting "weak slogans" from the Dems is because they are just a milder version of the Reps, nothing more and nothing less:you should go your own way and form a genuine alternative,namely, a socialist party like we have in Scotland, the Scottish Socialist Party (http://www.scottishsocialistparty.org/) or in England, the 'Respect' party. Otherwise, even sites like 'Alternet' itself will just be mere talking-shops, "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dems = Reps Lite Posted by: drone
Where are the real faces???
Posted by: Laurenk on Nov 2, 2005 9:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a blog that I think may interest many on this very same topic. It discusses keeping evangelical and all religion out of the voting booths and asks the questions - where are the liberal/democratic faces in times like these?? I hope you enjoy it.

http://letstalkaboutreligion.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no more for me....
Posted by: peridot on Nov 2, 2005 11:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The last remnant of the democratic party went down with Paul Wellstone. There is not a single democratic office holder that I am aware of in this woebegotton land that is worth a tinkers damn. The grandee's of the party are a sorry bunch of fickle and feckless sellouts. Many have been around for decades....some kind of alien life-form I suspect...so as a matter of self respect I have decided to cease voting

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: no more for me.... Posted by: beetruetoyou
» RE: no more for me.... Posted by: Pepper
» RE: no more for me.... Posted by: Lincoln fan
The Ballot Box
Posted by: peridot on Nov 4, 2005 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think there will be more of the same whether or not I participate. There is only one central issue concerning the political system and that is virulent, pervasive corruption. Both parties collude very successfully to exclude non-aligned would-be candidates on every level. This evolved system has no legitimacy and the voter by expressing this worthless franchise in fact endorses it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Ballot Box Posted by: Lincoln fan
Dems
Posted by: x27 on Nov 4, 2005 5:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes the democrats don't seem to have a plan of their own,This is the time to get together and come up with a coheseive plan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dems don't need slogans
Posted by: Ellie1 on Nov 5, 2005 2:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democratic party should not cater to the idiot right. Slogans must be backed by concrete, meaningful and realistic ideas, put out there for everyone to publicize like the so called "Bullet Points that the Republicans use (and abuse) so effectively. THAT is what the Democrats are missing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dems don't need slogans Posted by: Lincoln fan
ECLECTICIST, S. JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Nov 5, 2005 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"What did you expect...???" Insofar as the statement "America can do better..." What do we mean by "better"...??? Do we mean better citizens, weapons,military,religion, what...???
In my opinion, Bush 43 like most political animals, regardless of party affiliation are bought/sold by big money...My father, a political activist in Texas stated ,constantly repeated, and was exclaimed by Joe Kennedy during the John Kennedy campaign that : "Elections are won by three(3) things; Money, Money, and More Money..." Why do you think Tom "THe Money Hammer" Delay is on trail in Texas...? "Money, money, and more money..."
So if we are to reform, rather change. the political system then curtail the money aspect of elections via a "National Voting System.." not controlled by any party but by the public...

S...Jim...Rodriguez+++El Eclecticist+++
3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

relying on prosecutors ??
Posted by: owlbear1 on Nov 5, 2005 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not really.

More like those in power have become so arrogant they stopped worrying about covering up their crimes.

Dems biggest failure has been to just sit by and giggle as the Republicans cut their own throats...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republicrats
Posted by: lclark on Nov 5, 2005 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats are part pf the problem as well; both parties support the goals of the corportocracy. The recent attachment to the budget to increase H-1B visas by 350,000 was sponsered by Microsoft, they want to import cheaper IT workers even as the market has experienced job reductions over the years and as a market that should represent economic opportunity for minorities is opened to immigrants that will be offered those jobs at 35% less than a citizen would.

Our 'representatives' of both parties do not represent its citizens, the common good, or national interests. They represent their corporate sponsers. That's the reason Democrats can't mount an effective response to Republicans.

DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED AGAINST GIVING U.S. JOBS PERMANENTLY TO AN EXTRA 350,000 FOREIGN WORKERS A YEAR
Akaka of Hawaii
Byrd of West Virginia
Dayton of Minnesota
Dodd of Connecticut
Dorgan of North Dakota
Durbin of Illinois
Feingold of Wisconsin
Landrieu of Louisiana
Rockefeller of West Virginia
Stabenow of Michigan

INDEPENDENTS WHO VOTED AGAINST GIVING U.S. JOBS PERMANENTLY TO AN ADDITIONAL 350,000 FOREIGN WORKERS A YEAR
Jeffords of Vermont

REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED AGAINST GIVING U.S. JOBS PERMANENTLY TO AN ADDITIONAL 350,000 FOREIGN WORKERS A YEAR
Inhofe of Oklahoma
Sessions of Alabama
Vitter of Louisiana

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If I vote, donate and voluteer Dem, I can criticize all I want
Posted by: janvdb on Nov 5, 2005 8:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have no option but to try to push this party in the right direction, while sticking with it regardless of how bad it gets. Face it, progressives are trapped with the Dems, so criticizing the party is our only option.

Criticism can be productive, as long as we are reliably voting Dem and supporting Dems. Third party rantings and/or withdrawal into one's own personal clamshell and refusing to vote or donate/volunteer are nothing more than support for the Republicans.

Are voters to be expected to endure being trapped with the Dems, regardless of their failure to deliver, and ALSO to shut up and not express criticism? That's nonsense. If we are going to support this party, then we also have a right to try to push them in the right direction.

I draw the line at "in-fighting" to the point that one votes Green or doesn't vote. That's not "in-fighting" because one is not a Dem; that is just attacking the Dems. But criticizing the Dem leaders? Hey, I'm trapped in with them and I'll criticize if I think they deserve it.

We can infight but we need, also, to be realistic and to work toward realistic goals -- like taking the House of Reps back from the Repugs in 2006. Who is donating to the campaigns of Democrats in red states (other than one's own state) who have announced their intention of running against sitting Repugs in the House in 2006?

You sneering urban blue-staters -- you who wanted to secede from the white trash in the red states when Bush won -- are you donating any money to the campaigns of Dems in red states? If not, stop insulting rural America -- you're just making it ever harder for rural Dems to make any progress.

I think that if you are going to criticize, you need to "pay to say." Show your support with volunteering, activism, and donations and your VOTE and then criticize all you want.

If you don't vote or you vote Green or you don't donate or help, well, then SHUT UP. You have become part of the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Damn the Democrats, Long live the ????????
Posted by: fdr_vindicated on Nov 5, 2005 5:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everytime I visit Alternet.com and read the readers' responses, I get the feeling that this is a "shit on the Democrats" site. Very little is said in response to the excellent articles posted about the vicious, dangerous, racist, fascist, etc. acts of the present Repukian regime and controlled Congress, but volumes of vitriolic spittle is unloaded on the Democrat's leadership and its failure to respond with molotov cocktails and roadside bombs to the autrocities of our government. Get a grip. Things are starting to happen. Harry Ried's calling for a closed session of the Senate to deal with the Admenstruations (mispelling intended) lying and duplicity leading up to the Iraqi war is the sounding shot. Now I read of the Repukians claiming that their precious George made his decisions based on intelligence passed on to him by the "adultrous", family value-less Clinton administration. (Musing note: it is too bad that George W. doesn't have the comforting distraction of a BJ to insulate him from the BS he received and is receiving from the Vice and his cohorts.)

My point is: give it some time. The Bushies are squirming now and more is to come. The Dem's have given those worms enough rope and now we can enjoy them hanging themselves.

Right now I don't give a shit about the Congressional elections of 2006! With the gerrymandering that has taken place over the last 10 years, it would take a divine miracle for the Dems to take control of the House, and the Senate would be a minor miracle. But the mainstream media is starting to respond to the red meat being thrown them and it will be a delight to watch those fascists bastards mowed down as their putridness is exposed by the light of day.

Am I an optimist? Nah, not really. Just one with an historical perspective: our nation has been this way before, and the truth has won out!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Critiques are plentiful, but solutions...
Posted by: Yossarian on Nov 5, 2005 6:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A well-reasoned, articulate review of the situation. But we now need illumination. We need solutions. If the American Political System needs to be indicted, as the late Hunter S. Thompson alludes, then where do we, as the Loyal Oppostion, begin? Let this be the heart of discouse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isn't it obvious?
Posted by: h2oaso on Nov 6, 2005 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not a democracy, it's a plutocracy - just ask Eisenhower. Google "military-industrial complex". Democracy has no future in this country, as it is run by a corporate elite pulling the strings behind the scenes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Isn't it obvious? Posted by: peridot
Easy opinions and polling
Posted by: independent1 on Nov 6, 2005 10:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I agree that we should expect more from the Loyal Opposition, I also agree that an indictment of our political system is a good thing. But I'd go further: The average adult today is disgusted by the incompetence, plotting and corruption of our elected officials - and they "react" by taking the easy way out.

Polls get the attention of politicians, but polls are often taken "online" where a few clicks of the buttons defines "public opinion" while giving a false sense of security to that same public. We've formed bad habits as a result, to the extent that opinions have taken the place of investigation and reasoned thought. America is said to have become fat and lazy on fast foods - we've become mentally fat and lazy on the equivalent of fast foods: our addiction to forming easy opinions on complex issues.

Beyond that, I believe that we've reached this state because we've become a nation of ideologues. Ideologies are available like drugs in some remote bazaar and they too replace independent thinking and initiatives.

Conservative critics have been right all along - Liberals are struggling with their own intellectual bankruptcy. But at the same time, Conservatives are experiencing their own breakdown - that of reaching the absurd ends of their limited and hostile world view.

Is the behavior and performance of our two major political movements atrocious? Of course, because as Voltaire pointed out: When someone can get you to believe nonsense, then they can get you to commit atrocities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement