Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Whack Job on Harriet Miers

By Stephen Pizzo, News for Real. Posted October 28, 2005.


Karl Rove may have more to worry about than prosecutor Fitzgerald, when even the most loyal members of Bush's clan get axed when they become a liability.
The Whack Job on Harriet Miers
The Whack Job on Harriet Miers
Advertisement

The sedans pulled up in rapid succession as dusk settled over Washington last evening. Men in winter coats exited the backseats and walked briskly, heads down, into the building to an emergency meeting of party Capos. Permission was needed to dispose of a member who had become a liability.

The case for "whacking" the problem member was heard. Sober heads around the room nodded agreement. A contract was approved.

By sun up, Harriet Miers was history.

Karl Rove may have more to worry about from his boss than prosecutor Fitzgerald. Even the most loyal members of this gang are expendable when they become a liability. One of the gangs' former bosses, Richard Nixon, had his two closest aides whacked -- in what proved to be a futile effort to save his own skin -- when investigators began closing in on him.

Already we are seeing evidence that Bush may be getting ready to whack his own loyal aide, Karl "Turd Blossom" Rove. They have already brought in sub-capo Ed Gillespie to fill the hole. Eddy is already giving interviews, while Karl is nowhere to be seen. Bad sign.

Over at Cheney's crib, his right hand man, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, was seen yesterday hobbling around on crutches. No, he wasn't knee-capped - at least not yet. He was playing the sympathy card, trying to look too pathetic to indict -- or whack.

These are dangerous days. It's housecleaning time within the inner circles of  the Bush operation. It's the natural cycle for such organizations. Ranking members become radioactive after years of doing the boss's bidding, and they must be jettisoned. Those that can be trusted to keep their mouths shut are allowed to retire to lucrative, non-work positions on corporate boards. Those they suspect might run off at the mouth are whacked -- discredited, smeared, banished.

Fresh blood is moved up to fill the vacant positions. But, while eager to please the boss, these newcomers are green. They lack the years of street smarts possessed by the dearly departed they've replaced -- which makes all that eagerness a new disaster just waiting to happen.

Meanwhile, the boss, who does not trust new faces, has to figure out how he can keep the lid on the past while also staying in business. With Karl, all George had to say when he needed a job done was, "You know what to do, Karl." With a new guy, he might think Bush means, "Ed, you know what to do -- do the right thing."

As of this this morning, it's one problem gone and two to go -- Karl and Scooter.  If I were either man, I'd hire someone to start my car every morning for the next week or so.

Meanwhile, Patrick "Elliot Ness" Fitzgerald may have discovered another of the gang's operations over in Niger. A curious fellow by nature, Fitz could not have investigated Ambassador Joe Wilson's fact-finding trip to Niger without noticing the "facts" he was sent to find out about. To wit - those phony documents that supposedly proved that Iraq had been seeking uranium yellow cake from Niger. (Document images and translations, here).

Those documents proved to be forgeries -- that we know. What we don't know is, who forged them? It sure as hell wasn't a CIA job, since the CIA never believed the Niger tale from the get-go. But Cheney sure did -- or at least he said he did.

So the question remains hanging out there --  who planted those phony documents -- and just in time for Bush to hawk them in a pre-war State of the Union message?  

Until we find out the answer to that question the CIA leak investigation will  not be complete. (More)

"This, we know now, was all based on fabricated documents. But it's not clear yet … who fabricated the documents. -- The documents were fabricated by supporters of the policy in the United States. The policy being that you had to invade Iraq in order to get rid of Saddam Hussein, and you had to do it soon to avoid the catastrophe that would be produced by Saddam Hussein's use of alleged weapons of mass destruction.(Full story)

Recent rumblings from Fitzgerald watchers is that he wants to know more about how the documents showed up when they did, why and who made that happen. Fitz has proven himself to be a man who -- one way or another -- gets what he wants. If he is allowed to pursue the origins of the phony Niger documents they may join the Nixon's tapes as evidence that leads directly to the Oval Office.

Therefore, as it turned out for Boss Nixon, Bush's housecleaning may turn out to be too little, too late.

Digg!

Stephen Pizzo is the author of numerous books, including "Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans," which was nominated for a Pulitzer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Harriet Miers is a Quitter : (
Posted by: nitsua1023 on Oct 28, 2005 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the Tammy Faye eyeliner that keeps her from getting my vote.

There should be a constitutional law-based, reality game-show. America's Next Justice. They have to sing a Luther Vandross song, and live in a house together, and eat 2 cow eyeballs, and go on blind dates with one another, but also have to know, or least have read the constitution and know a thing or two about it. We would all get to vote by phone of course.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

trappedintwilightzone
Posted by: trapped in twilight zone on Oct 28, 2005 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stephen--from your keyboard to God's eyes!

For the past five years I've spent a good part of every day muttering "I can't believe what everybody's letting these creeps get away with" and stuff to that effect. When is enough enough?

If everything were running swimmingly--economy humming along while we all enjoyed prosperity now and the prospect of secure retirements, our nation still enjoying a modicum of respect in the world, our soldiers not losing their lives and being maimed while slaughtering tens of thousands of innocent civilians in a country that's never harmed us in any way, etc., etc., etc.--in other words, if things were as they were a mere six years ago--I could perhaps understand why folks might go about their business and leave Bush & company to their internecine games. Take the attitude that boys will be boys, as long as the carnage they wrought was only among their own ranks.

But that isn't the case. These gangsters haven't wrought their crimes only among themselves. Our nation as a whole and the vast majority of citizens individually have been rendered seriously worse off from the policies and misdeeds of Bush and his people. As has a significant part of the rest of the world. Not to mention the grim future they've created for our children and grandchildren. Yet days pass one at a time, growing into months and years while we lift not a finger to stop them.

Please, God, let them self-destruct. Because apparently we are content to put up with infinite malicious conduct if they don't. Shame on us. Because of our own apathy, we've come to deserve what they're doing to us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: trappedintwilightzone Posted by: colorose
» RE: trappedintwilightzone Posted by: Maryanne
» RE: trappedintwilightzone Posted by: crusty
» RE: trappedintwilightzone Posted by: joanmo
» RE: trappedintwilightzone Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: trappedintwilightzone Posted by: spyderbaby
» RE: trappedintwilightzone Posted by: spyderbaby
god is dead
Posted by: menckenman on Oct 28, 2005 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pray instead for reason to overcome rightousness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: god is dead Posted by: trapped in twilight zone
And in the world... You know. That thing. Out there-->
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Oct 28, 2005 7:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two darn lawyers are in the headlines today:

One, a lawyer named Harriet Meiers who was yesterday also named an un-justice.

And the other, a lawyer who MAY be about to POSSIBLY give us grounds to SUSPECT that there may be some not-so-straight arrows in that MOST VIRTUOUS of all towns, Washington, D.C. (ala Plamegate and peanut butter sandwiches). As a longtime resident of Louisiana, I don't know HOW I WILL BE ABLE TO GO ON WITH LIFE, if I find out that politicians are crooked. If we can't count on the politico's hold to the highest standards of integrity, after all, who in this plane of existence can we count on?

In the rest of the world, a certain mad president of a certain mad state has recommitted his country's CONSTITUTIONAL VOW of "WIPING ISRAEL OFF THE MAP, ALLAH WILLING, AND ANYONE WHO RECOGNIZES ISRAEL, ALLAH WILLING" That would, presumably be us--oh, wait, yeah, he said it: "I MEAN YOU, UNITED STATES". Said country is also insisting it has the sovereign right to a nuclear program (or, if you prefer, a nookie-yool-her pro-grim). Oh yeah (again) this saber-rattling from the ayatollahs et al., (presidents and holy poobahs really aren't different in said country) is being done while 25-35% of our military is currently committed to protecting democratic processes in a country that may or may be willing to support democratic processes, instead of fighting the war on terror. Those ARE two different goals, current dogma notwithstanding.

And the lawyers grab the headlines. What an un-justice. What a damn, damn crying plame.

Mark Twain had a very, very interesting and approrpriate quote about the current state of media affairs (which is tough to do, post-mortem). If you've torn yourself away from the "real" news of the lawyers, for this long, then it's worth a read:

"That awful power, the public opinion of a nation, is created in America by a horde of ignorant, self-complacent simpletons who, having failed at ditching and shoemaking, fetched up in journalism on the way to the poorhouse."

Today's journalists ought to be beaten with a rolled up newspaper, and made to lie in a small corner until they are better trained. Hell, we could bring the Abu Gharibees out of retirement (in the brig) and put their "talents" to good use on these journalistic whelps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huh?
Posted by: lynnejane on Oct 28, 2005 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Was I asleep? I have read NOWHERE that Harriet Meirs decision was anyone's other than hers. Give me facts, not inuendo. Meirs quit on her own, as far as I know. Good idea, though. Thanks, Harriet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Huh? Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Huh? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Huh? Posted by: elfrijole1
Creative Journalism and what corruption!
Posted by: eastcoker on Oct 28, 2005 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forged CIA documents?! What kind of country are we living in anyways? This is scandalous. What a time to be raising children in. Thank God my child is too young to be asking questions about any of this. What can I hope for by the time she starts discussing politics in school? When is that anyways in the American Education System?

By the way, No Child Left Behind, what kind of country is Bush creating for the children with all this corruption and scandal? Is he thinking about the children? I don't think so. I think that was a promotional gig for his platform and now he has forgotten about the children ENTIRELY.

I am mad...This country is not safe for children. Why look at George Bush's nephew. His family does not know how to raise children. I hate to slander, but it's true. And I hear Jeb is getting groomed for the presidency?

I tell you the Oval Office is just a big boy's club. And I don't have much hope for things ever changing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Harriet Miers and Gonzo separated at Birth
Posted by: BuckFush on Oct 28, 2005 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rats are leaving the ship.

Why do all these stars from the late 70's/early 80's keep surfacing? The resemblance between Gonzo and Harriet is too uncanny to be a coinckydink.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is very hard to pinpoint...
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Oct 28, 2005 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a specific cause for the Miers mess.

It's obviously a bundle of things. Pick your poison. I've developed a drinking song you can try at home if you're inclined. Just switch around the words of "twelve days of Christmas" and you got it.

On my 12th day of Supco, my governor gave to me…

Judge Bork objecting,
Arlen Specter pecking,
Gary Bauer bitching
Trent Lott a leaping,
George Will a wailing,
Sam Brownback sulking,
Lindsey Graham grumbling
Rush Lim-baugh’s pissed!
Peggy Noonan’s nah,
David Frum’s harrumph
Bill Kristol’s hiss, and
Ann Coulter slandering me.

Happy inappropriately early holiday wishes to all!

The Twelve Days of Miers: An inappropriately early holiday motif song parody/commentary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fun with words!
Posted by: evermind on Oct 28, 2005 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shortly into this article, a new name popped into my head. I've always hated the way conservatives and neocons have altered the American lexicon by deliberate (mis)use of vocabulary. I'm referring not to sentence structure, of course, but to the marketing of such terms as "compassionate conservative" and "the death tax" and the demonization of "liberal."

But, you know, it's fun thinking those up. I just thought of "The Texas Mafia."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fun with words! Posted by: JohnnyM
How about this?
Posted by: purplewarrior on Oct 28, 2005 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article makes it sound like Bush has been in charge of his administration and that now, after independent consideration and thought, he may dismiss Rove because he has found him to be a liability. The truth is that Bush cannot do without Rove. Without Rove the ship has no rudder. I think the whole Harriet Miers debacle came about because Rove was distracted by his own problems, the ship was going in circles, Bush had a "bright" idea and acted on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How about this? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: How about this? Posted by: Basenjis
Origins of Niger Documents
Posted by: bqtrain on Oct 28, 2005 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author must not have seen this article in American Prospect about the origins of the Niger Documents.

La Repubblica's Scoop, Confirmed

It seems that the documents were created by people in the Italian intelligence who were trying to create closer ties to the US government. The CIA dismissed them but Cheney rejected the CIA analysis because he was searching for any evidence to back his Iraq policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Next
Posted by: thehousedog on Oct 28, 2005 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Such turmoil in Washington! What could possibly happen that would galvanize the country and make us all forget about this? A terrorist attack? Another natural disaster? Volcanoes? Earthquakes?

Watch in the next week how something "unexpected" wipes all this off the radar screen of everybody.

We've had the wool pulled over our eyes for nearly 8 years now by this team of clowns. What could possibly awake us from our slumber?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Next Posted by: nellyman
» RE: What Next Posted by: FURonnie
Rampant adolescence
Posted by: Maryanne on Oct 28, 2005 4:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whatever her views on constitutional issues (if she even has these), Harriet Miers was an inappropriate person to even recommend for the Supreme Court.

Her adulation of Bush- "genius". "cool", "the most intelligent man I had even met", etc. is an adolescent reaction. Whatever we think of Bush, he is not a rock star, but stands in the shoes of a leader of our country. Her public statements about him are inappropriate.

Her inability to properly answer a questionaire is also a quality one might expect from a not too bright high schooler.

Emotionally she appears to be not an adult. We do not need children on the Supreme Court. By even considering herself for the role, she so thoroghly embarrased herself. And it was embarrassing to watch her - looking adoring at him!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]