Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Repopulating New Orleans at Any Cost

By Michelle Chen . Posted October 18, 2005.


Residents and workers are rebuilding the city in the shadow of toxic contamination, even as officials at all levels give mixed messages about the wisdom of returning to the area.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Michelle Chen

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The new New Orleans is a post-apocalyptic frontier town. Residents trickle in to scavenge among the ruins or begin scraping layers of mold from waterlogged homes. Workers pile sodden chunks of houses into putrid mounds on the street, feeding an estimated 50 million cubic yards of hurricane debris.

Amid warnings that the city is reassembling itself in the deepening shadow of toxic contamination, local officials are undaunted. Backed by reassurances from state and federal environmental authorities, Mayor Ray Nagin is beckoning people to come back, clean up, go on with life and get back to business.

"It's a dirty town," said Jeffrey Thomas, a local environmental lawyer who has returned regularly to the city on volunteer relief missions. "It's dusty, and a lot of the residue from the flooding is evident everywhere."

Disturbed that he has no idea if his own neighborhood is safe to live in, Thomas complained, "Nobody's telling me anything … At what point does the public get apprised of this situation and involved?"

A Sopping Mess

According to sampling data from the Environmental Protection Agency, sediment left over from Katrina's floodwaters harbors fuel components, metals, pesticides and other chemicals. Many contaminants could potentially cause acute and chronic health effects, including nervous system damage and cancer, and some are steadily evaporating into the air that residents are breathing.

Meanwhile, splotches of fuzzy mold consume walls, ceilings and furniture. Indoor mold spores can cause or aggravate respiratory illnesses, especially in people with weak immune systems, and emit chemicals known as mycotoxins, which studies have tied to debilitating illnesses.

"You have a real gemischt in these houses," said David Straus, a microbiologist and mold specialist at Texas Technical University, of the mix of biological and chemical substances. "It's not just mold. You have all these other potential toxins." He pointed out the possibility of "a synergistic effect" as airborne mold compounds the effects of chemical pollutants.

Despite detecting persistent contamination for over a month, the EPA's analysis has generally deemed the chemical concentrations not "immediately hazardous to human health." The EPA has also stated that fuel oil residues would not harm emergency responders wearing appropriate protective gear. The agency reported that most readings for the toxic fuel components benzene, toluene, and xylene were safe for short-term, 24-hour exposures.

Concerned that the EPA's assessments were inadequate, Wilma Subra, a local environmental chemist, conducted her own testing in New Orleans and neighboring St. Bernard Parish last month. She found several carcinogenic toxins, including the probable carcinogen Benzo(a)pyrene, along with concentrations of arsenic up to 75 times greater than the EPA residential safety standard. Subra also detected heavy metals, like lead, and hazardous petrochemicals.

Subra said that although her results are comparable to what the EPA has found, her evaluation lacks the EPA's positive spin. The agency assesses contaminants in isolation, she said, whereas she looks at the confluence of overlapping biological and chemical hazards.

"If it was a Superfund site," said Subra, "and the concentrations were at the levels we're finding, they wouldn't allow people to go back and live there. They would require that that material be removed, treated, detoxified."

Safety Second

While monstrous fungal growths and chemical-encrusted sludge drape the Crescent City, environmentalists say that the EPA's response is scarcely visible, eclipsed by the political momentum of the rebuilding process.

Dana Tulis, deputy director of the EPA Office of Emergency Management, said the agency's role "continues to evolve" and essentially follows the cues of policymakers. "The locals are making the decisions, and we're trying to provide them with the best data we can," she told The NewStandard.

Tulis said the EPA will continue monitoring to determine long-term environmental impacts, and the Army Corps of Engineers is developing plans to clear out the sediment in the coming months. In the meantime, she said, "as long as people aren't sort of trudging through this stuff, you know, barefoot… they should be okay."


Digg!

Michelle Chen writes, works and plays in New York City. Involved with independent media for the past nine years, she has written for the South China Morning Post, Clamor, INTHEFRAY.COM and her own zine, cain.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Excellent article
Posted by: curt_b on Oct 18, 2005 5:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems every day the story of the reconstruction of the Gulf Coast gets uglier and uglier, and further from the light of day. Just as the Main Stream Media touts the Constitutional balloting in Iraq as the next step for democracy, they now focus on the Blue Ribbon panels that are going to rebuild New Orleans. The writer of this article shows the importance of factual reporting on the ongoing threats to the possible return of many of the displaced. More coverage of the region by her and others can be found at:
The NewStandard

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Link corrected Posted by: curt_b
» RE: xcellent article Posted by: marcus99nd
Camp N'Orlens, anyone?
Posted by: Spot on Oct 18, 2005 6:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the displaced residents of new orleans should take a page out of ms. sheehan's book and move to crawford (or the real white house) until the administration sees fit to acknowledge them. I'm aware of the problems of transportation and funding, but isn't there a wealthy liberal or two who could jumpstart such a program?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Best way to solve problem is to ignore it.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Oct 18, 2005 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the "action" I've observed so far from this Administration, Congress and Senate for the entire southern part of Louisiana and Mississippi except for the oil pipelines and refineries. There is obviously no urgency to help people on their part. Oil is a limited resource, while there will always more people.

The current rule of congress is to throw money to the most corrupt corporations I've ever seen that can accomplish nothing and go through billions doing it. I'd say that "We the people" has gotten lost. Just like Orwell wrote in Animal Farm, "all animals are considered equal, some more equal than others (i.e. our representatives)".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ahh-go help yourself--we ain't responsible...
Posted by: fedupamerican on Oct 18, 2005 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well doesn't this just paint the perfect picture of how BIG Govt. wants things to be? Figure it out yourself!
And how LOCAL Govt. just doesn't know how to do a damn thing either!! Figure it out yourself...

While we're all floundering around - fishes out of water- trying really hard to pull ourselves up by our breaking boot straps.

I cannot believe the lack of responsibility by governmental and environmental offices in general that are sited in this article - governments of any sort, size, shape are just ignorant of how to help people. They don't want to co-operate or communicate with each other for a solution. They don't care! These groups seem to be isolated in their own little quandry-ridden worlds, just blabbing to the sky, with the result that nothing is being done to truly inform, organize, and help 'the people' -- perhaps they hope those people will quietly die-off from their uneducated exposures to toxins.
This country is ruled by idiots!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» human Posted by: montana freeman
"...her results are comparable to what the EPA has found..."
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 18, 2005 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for admitting that the complaints in this article are all about 'spin.' We need such honesty, even when it means we have to accept some of the blame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"New Orleans Rebuilding Benefits WHOM?"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Oct 18, 2005 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's obvious that what's driving the reoccupation of New Orleans is what's been drivng the rest of America extraordinarily hard these last few years: business – commerce – and that people are expendable. After all, in today's no-jobs "economic recovery," if returnees get sick, there are plenty of replacements to be found, right? And because the health effects of returning to live in toxic soup will not be insured because the return is "voluntary," it won't even cost the health industry that much if people get sick.

Believe me – this is how government and industry thinks these days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Supporting News We Need
Posted by: I3IVIIVI on Oct 18, 2005 10:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The source of this news article, the NewStandard, is in the midst of a fundraising drive. If they can't double their membership from 500 to 1,000, they won't be able to continue-- the staff has been on overdrive for so long, a couple years apparently, that they need reinforcements. A source of accurate news is so necessary for any positive change - as opposed to the propaganda outlets establishment sources, both corporate and government, so often prove themselves to be. Yet getting the necessary support for a progressive, hard news organization, even one as self-proved as The NewStandard -- is so difficult.

I know, I help Narco News by collecting money at The Fund for Authentic Journalism.

I'm convinced the most "change for the dollar" in fighting for justice and liberty comes from supporting honest news sources accountable to readers, not owners or advertisers. I hope
The NewStandard is successful in its drive for supporting members.

Link to NewStandard fundraising drive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Indian Country and Cleanup effort
Posted by: crazyoglala on Oct 18, 2005 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are any Dept of Interior folks letting American Indians know about safety measures and other information before they made their choices to rush to New Orleans for the cleanup effort?

Blackfeet hit road for jobs in South
By JARED MILLER
Tribune Regional Reporter

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Norleans should never have been made into a city !
Posted by: cobrajet on Oct 18, 2005 1:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THis place is below sea level, it has ocean to the south, a lake to the north. What were these people thinking when they built this town ? It should be put back as a natural coastal area swamp. There should be no one living there in the first place. Here is what I think is happening.
The govt is waiting for everyone to either die, or vacate the area, then they can move in, declare immenint domain, take the land for govt use, they hold onto it for awhile til this is in the past, then sell it off to highest bidder, and then resorts, and shipping ports are built that make better use of the land.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The french new better to build on the high ground
Posted by: DAWK on Oct 22, 2005 3:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well Duuuhhh....what dam fool would buy overpriced land which corrupt local government officals approve as 'development properties' ? since the city had incentives to collect 'fat' property taxes for decades,with this scam of a process,duping all newcommers who wanted to 'live in the gala party town' ,regardless if it was glaringly under water level,...your home will be flooded-eventualy,reality,then let these idiots who actually believed the government was protecting them , suffer! Screw FEMA,and those who chose to live -work in this conedmable land of 'guarnteed flooding',since they were NOT heeding the wisdom of the ancestors 'french quarter' who were so obvious in their wisdom!
I recall on TV , bob villa refurbishing an old new orleans home that was considered 'historic ' ,but was rotting and decayed,so villa tells the owner 'it would cost a 100 grand,and no-matter,they refinanced the house,since it had increased in value to 300 grand and every one wanted the to live in the grand illusion of this 'special party town".now, I laughed as the house that was so carefully remodeled,was now underwater,like the rest of them.AND... now they want to rebuild the city?!! NOT bluddy-loikley! My pont,is just how were the owners intelligent enough to go through all the agonizing details of remodeling this house,but FAILED...to see it was really ,UNDER WATER,and failed to see the biggest weakness of the entire idea?
How can anyone blame government for this,since new orleans corruption is really responsible for such deeds. then add the superdome delima; i wrote an article about all our superdomes being 'sports-first' and not disaster shelters first. My contention was that these 'domes' should,by LAW be built as SHELTER-FIRST,then sports,but with emergency food supplies-restrooms,medical aids, and fuck the 'private box,hotel rooms for the rich' since these 'rooms' built into these domes should be made for the disaster refugees,and planning should be done-so in accordance! Why should these 'domes' get big tax breaks and eminent domain laws bully home owners out-domes-in?
New Orleans is as good as 'radioactive-contanimated' ground as far as thoughts of rebuilding,and perspectives... then becomes clear about resettling .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]