Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Howard Zinn: Vision and Voice

By Terrence McNally, AlterNet. Posted October 21, 2005.


The author of 'A People's History of the United States' talks about falling into academia, his new book and the people making tomorrow's history today.
Howard Zinn: Vision and Voice
Howard Zinn: Vision and Voice

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Terrence McNally

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

I first saw Howard Zinn when I was in college in the Boston area in the late 60s. Along with William Sloane Coffin of Yale and Noam Chomsky of MIT, he was a leader of protests against the Vietnam War. Nearly 40 years later, as Zinn speaks against another misguided foreign adventure, he's still vital at 83 and his voice and vision still vitally important. His classic, A People's History of the United States, has sold over a million copies.

Of his newest book, Voices of a People's History of the United States (co-edited with Anthony Arnove), Zinn has said, "Educators and politicians may say that students ought to learn pure facts, innocent of interpretation, but there's no such thing! Long before I decided to write A People's History, which came out in 1980, my partisanship was shaped by my upbringing in a working-class immigrant family, by my three years as a shipyard worker, by my experience as a bombardier in World War II, and by the civil rights movement in the South and the movement against the war in Vietnam. So I've chosen to emphasize voices of resistance -- to class oppression, racial injustice, sexual inequality, nationalist arrogance -- left out of the orthodox histories."

Terrence McNally: You weren't necessarily destined to be a college professor, were you?

Howard Zinn: No. I wasn't destined to be one, I wasn't prepared to be one, and certainly my parents didn't expect me to be one. I think my parents, like most working-class parents, just hope their kids will survive and be healthy and make a living of some sort. I was a shipyard worker for three years from the age of 18-21, then I was in the Air Force. But somewhere along the line I got interested in reading, in history, in politics. When I was a teenager I read Upton Sinclair and I read Karl Marx -- I'm not supposed to say that!

I think the remarkable thing is that you actually read him.

I did not read Volume Three of Das Kapital, but I read a lot of him. I read Sinclair and Jack London and Lincoln Steffens and all sorts of people who got me excited about the world around us, and interested in things like fascism and socialism and democracy and all of that.

When I got out of the Air Force, I was married and we had a kid and then two kids, and I was knocking around in various jobs and my wife was working. We were sort of a typical struggling young working class family living in a low income housing project in Manhattan, and I just decided to go to college under the G.I. Bill. Marvelous thing the G.I. Bill. Today not just Republicans but Democrats like Clinton say "the era of big government is over, we must get government out of this and government out of that." Well, the government can do marvelous things. Private enterprise was certainly not going to give working class kids an education. You leave things to the free market and the rich will go to college and the poor will go to work.

My dad, also a bombardier in World War II, came back and got an Ivy League education on that G.I. Bill, graduating with three children. Very similar situation. That isn't available today.

No, not at all. In fact, the way tuition has skyrocketed even in the state schools, it's very very difficult now for working-class kids to go to college. College is becoming again more and more a place for the well-to-do. That's just part of what has been a polarization of wealth in this country over these last decades, the rich becoming richer, the poor having children.

Was Spelman College your first teaching gig?

I had a couple of part-time teaching jobs while I was in graduate school, but Spelman was my first real, full-time teaching job. I didn't actually choose Spelman -- a black women's college.

I was thinking that was an odd fit, how did it happen?

Really an accident, I'm not black and I'm not a woman, right? I can't say I was such a socially conscious person that I wanted to teach at a black college in the South. No, not so at all. I was just looking for a job, and the president of Spelman was up north talking to my advisor at Columbia, and my advisors recommended me. So I met with the president of Spelman and he offered me a job as chair of a department. Imagine, my first job as chair of the department! I mean, a small department, but still. Frankly I hadn't even considered teaching at a negro college. I wasn't really even aware of that phenomenon, you see. Though of course at that time I was certainly very conscious of the race question.

How much did that odd turn in the road affect the rest of your life?

Oh, I think that it was critical. Seven years at Spelman, in the South, involved in the movement and involved with SNCC. I went from Atlanta to Albany, Georgia to report on the demonstrations there. Then to Selma, Alabama and Hattiesburg, Mississippi. Those seven years, those years of what is called the movement, were very exciting years and educational years and important years. I'm sure I learned more from that experience than my students learned from me.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Interviewer Terrence McNally hosts Free Forum on KPFK 90.7FM, Los Angeles (streaming at kpfk.org), where he interviews people he believes can help create 'a world that just might work.'

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Favorite Quote From This Book
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Oct 21, 2005 3:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
O, let America be America again-
The land that never has been yet ...

Langston Hughes

To me this summarizes the book. The America we were taught about in school never existed. But it could have and it should have and maybe someday it will..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you, Howard Zinn.
Posted by: Urstrly on Oct 21, 2005 4:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never knew how many Filippinos died when we took over their country, and I might never have if I hadn't read this interview. What I like about Zinn is that he addresses the part of history from which we might avert our eyes. You still can't find a running tally of Iraqi casualties in any newspaper I read, or on tv.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» howard zinn documentary Posted by: wleming
Question
Posted by: Neruda on Oct 21, 2005 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I want to point out that people who seem to have no power, whether working people, people of color, or women -- once they organize and protest and create movements -- have a voice no government can suppress."

One of the first things that occurred me reading this quote was how to view fundamentalist movements like we are seeing both in the middle east and in the U.S.

If movements have a developmental trajectory whereby they increase in power and momentum, how do we respond to the fundamentalist movement in our own country?

Or is there something that makes this movement different from other grass roots movements in the U.S.

I am not sure what the answer to this question but believe it's an important discussion to have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Question Posted by: loony
» RE: Question: Neruda Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: Question Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Fundamentalists Posted by: tuff_bird
» RE: Fundamentalists Posted by: Lincoln fan
johngeb
Posted by: johngeb on Oct 21, 2005 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The correct form for the people of the Philippines is "Filipinos."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

maybe the dark side increasing
Posted by: woody on Oct 21, 2005 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like Neruda, I am not optimistic. Both the virulence of a very coordinated religious-political fundamentalism and the mendacity of a definitely anti-populist, anti-democratic, yes, fascistic, federal government cabal seem capable of holding power by using near-absolute powers (Patriot Act in current state, Congressional domination, court domination), undergirded by a police-state mentality in much of domestic police forces and supplemented by martial law powers proliferating--and this all set into what appears to be a populace dumbfounded, manipulable, and without its own sense of propriety, of its semi-demi-democratic roots--always pruned by the oligarchy that has (I believe) been in power since the inception of the nation--as I believe Zinn documented in "A People's History."
We are at a precipice because of economic stresses, environmental stress and destruction, threat of pandemic--and out of this potential wreckage, what nations will remain democratic, even in form?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: maybe the dark side increasing Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: maybe the dark side increasing Posted by: Edward George
Stand Up Son, Mr. Zinn Is Passing
Posted by: malcolmartin on Oct 21, 2005 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is some insight about our government’s detour into Iraq in its faux-War on Terror in a scene from the movie Godfather II. The scene is set in the Cuba of 1958 and mob boss Michael Corleone is on a mission to Havana to check on the family’s very lucrative business interests. He witnesses a rebel cornered by the authorities scream out “Viva Fidel” and detonate a grenade that kills himself and a police captain.

Later Corleone meets with Hyman Roth, a character based on mobster Meyer Lansky, and the following exchange ensues:

Corleone: A rebel was being arrested by the military police, and rather than be taken alive, he exploded a grenade he had hidden in his jacket. He killed himself and he took a capital of the command with him…it occurred to me the soldiers are paid to fight, the rebels aren’t.
Roth: What does that tell you?
Corleone: They can win.

Recent polls indicate that the vast majority of the American people believe the U.S. cannot or will not win in Iraq. These Americans are simply drawing from that same well of common sense as the fictional Michael Corleone did in the film.

Our working-class sons and daughters are locked into this deadly imperial war in Iraq based on an order from their ruling-class Commander-in-Chief George W. Bush. Otherwise they have no stake whatsoever. They are motivated only by the common peril they face. U.S. soldiers are fighting for their own survival and for their brothers and sisters-in-arms next to them in a hostile place far from home.

This past April one of Iraq’s insurgent groups issued a statement that concluded, “We are coming.” A tidal wave of attacks, suicide and otherwise, followed that turned May and June of 2005 into unspeakably bloody months for U.S. and Iraqi government forces. Who will win in Iraq? Answer that question this way. Try to imagine any American, military or civilian, willing to enlist in a suicide mission, much less shouting “Viva Bush” as they perished for the noble cause he espouses. Compare the act of gladly giving up your life for an insurgency with the government of an occupation force that will not even slightly discomfort its rich with higher taxes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Paid to fight Posted by: loony
» Yes -- Read do "Collapse" Posted by: AdamSelene11726
bases, bases, bases
Posted by: weGotCactus on Oct 21, 2005 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think the Bush administration cares too much about chaos in Iraq, as long as the plan to establish permanent military bases is able to progress. Chaos may even justify the permanent presence. The bases are the real prize, and absent a definitive repudiation of neo-con policies by voters, we are in Iraq to stay, even if we have to wall off our bases to do it. I'm not sure electing a centrist Democrat in 2008 is enough to insure a true withdrawal, and it sure isn't going to happen on Bush's watch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bases, bases, bases Posted by: owleyes
Great as Ever
Posted by: Pete29 on Oct 21, 2005 11:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Howard Zinn, as always. You are an inspiration and truly one of the great American heroes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bonus Army
Posted by: Guy on Oct 21, 2005 11:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another chapter in American history that you won't learn about in high school is that of the Bonus Army following WWI. Read about it in Zinn's book, A People's History of the US.

Guy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bruno
Posted by: bruno on Oct 21, 2005 2:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr Zinn mentions that he doesn't know when and how we will leave Iraq. I think I have a pretty good idea what will happen. The how - will be the US declaring victory and leaving. This will be done by the new Democratic president in 2009.

The when will be after the Republicans lose power in both Congress and the White House in the 2008 elections. If Shrub had to run again for office, the US would leave (or substantially leave) before the 2006 elections. Unfortunately for our soldiers and the Iraqi people, he doesn't face the electorate again, and isn't overly concerned about public opinion or the Republican election machinery needed for him to get elected again (Miers for Supreme Court tells us alot about his concern for
conservatives).

If more families were affected and it wasn't a volunteer Army the timetable would be quicker but, sad to say, it just doen't intimately impact a large enough segment of our population. (We need a draft again).

He fooled us twice at the polls, secured the tax breaks he wanted, got to wear his jump suit and fly a plane, and solved daddy's problem with Sadam. After the last election he said "he's going to quack like a duck" if he won. He won and we lost, and now it's Miller time!

The Administration will reduce soldiers levels between now and then, but it won't be enough to stop the insurgency and the killing. The trickle of war dead will dominate the media coverage and preclude the long term spinfoolery of the American people, even though they so enjoy a good yarn. The ending of this story has become so obvious, it just doesn't have any good suspense remaining for the American listener.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bruno Posted by: loony
» RE: Bruno Posted by: leeman
21st Century - A People's History
Posted by: rwcbanzai on Oct 21, 2005 4:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dr. Zinn:
Your book tells our history our karma. From the viewpoint of the comman person and not the leadership. I applaud your courage to tell the people's story!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Capote's version of American history
Posted by: Domingo Nieves on Oct 22, 2005 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I recently read Truman Capote's "In Cold Blood", and it gave me additional insight into why we Americans undertake initiatives like the war in Iraq. It's shortsighted to explain away that adventure by suggesting that we are mainly out to settle an old score with Saddam, or that it's all about oil and seeking empire. Bush speaks loudly to our collective desire to take out the bad guys in order to provide safety for ourselves and our families. And although I feel that using military force does not in general promote peace and security, quite the opposite, for the most part (smile) I do not question the good intentions of President Bush.
Capote's novel also fleshes out 'the bad guys'. It might have been helpful to have had a similar portrayal of Saddam before we determined to squash him. Perhaps his trial will serve that purpose. Perhaps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the answers Mr. Zinn?
Posted by: eDubble23 on Nov 7, 2005 1:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me first make one thing clear: I am not a racist. I am not a member of the financial elite. I did not support the initial phases of the Iraq war, nor am I currently a rabid supporter of it. Claims of Saddam's chemical/biological stockpile I knew were far-fetched, and the supposed ties to fundamentalist orgs I knew to be highly improbable. Any student or habitué of Middle East politics, culture, and history could have surmised as much.
However, in your interview Mr. Zinn, you speak so insidiously of prior discrepancies in American history without taking into account the prevailing mindset of the times. The oppression of African-Americans, the often forgotten deaths of 600,000 Filipinos during TR's administration, and the lost voices of America's subjugated classes were no doubt stains on the trumped up reputation of our history. But these issues, along with many others, are easy to scrutinize in retrospect. These events took place at a time when many people's perceptions were simply a product of mainstream thought. For instance, the issue of African American civil rights only picked up steam among non-blacks during the 1960's. During the Civil War, while there was a public outcry regarding the immoral practice of slavery, there was no popular call to establish African Americans as full and complete equals. As well, racism and resentment were largely prevalent before and after the Civil War. During the first half of the twentieth century, in the so-called "free north", segregation was a regular practice. The stringent color-code of the famed Cotton Club is a perfect example of this. The point is, public perception and mainstream thought is determined by the majority of a people who hold these feelings in the first place. As society evolves, and minorities and economic dysfunctionaries assume greater roles, the public perception shifts. Then we can all look back and say gee that particular event was terrible, thank god things are different now. But when that event took place, it was the norm, or even viewed as right. Now, I don't know which theatre you served in during WWII Mr. Zinn. But, I would find it hard to believe if you claimed to never hold resentment or racist feeling towards the Germans or Japanese. You may have even felt you were truly justified in those emotions. I hold the assertion that the opinions and emotions of the people involved in these nefarious events within our history also felt the same justification.--Continued Below

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the answers Mr. Zinn?
Posted by: eDubble23 on Nov 7, 2005 1:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These feelings of moral complacency continue until society as a whole experieces the aforementioned shift in mainstream perception. Did many if not most people before 1850 accept slavery? Yes. Did many before the civil rights movement harbor racist feelings? YES. Were many people emboldened by America's new found capabilities after the Industrial Revolution? Absolutely! Was it wrong? Probably, but I can't say for sure. Right and wrong are matters of public perception.
Now Mr. Zinn, if I might be so bold to address your views on the current state of affairs in the Iraq war. To completely withdraw at this point would be a complete and utter disaster. Forget failure at the moment, we're talking civil war and regional instability for perhaps a decade. You contend it is already a disaster, and that chaos already becomes the country. Though I'm not sure your definition of chaos, and my perception of potential chaos are at parallel levels. You see, if we leave Iraq as it now exists I guarantee a catastrophe of epic proportions. Allow me to elaborate. The federalist system in place as a result of the Iraqi constitutional referrendum has the country divided--along ethnic lines--into three provinces: the Kurds in the north, the Shi'tes in the south, and the Sunni's somewhere in the middle. Already, the Kurds and Shi'ites are moving closer to complete autonomy and eventual sovereignty within their respective territories. The Kurds (the largest ethnic population in the world without a country), want to re-establish Kurdistan as a sovereign territory in the region. Anyone who thinks different is simply blind to the facts. If they were to do so, that in itself could cause a whole host of problems. Just ask the Turks, who have a sizable Kurdish population in the southern region along the Iraq border. Turkey is no doubt concerned with this issue because they have an understandable fear that the Kurds will try to chip away at their territory along the southern frontier. Iran and Syria hold the same reserves concerning this prospect, as they too would share sizable borders with any Kurdish state. Additionally, while the Iraqi Shi'ites claim an Arab identity, they in fact have a close relationship with the Iranian Shi'tes of Persian heritage.--Continued Below

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the answers Mr. Zinn?
Posted by: eDubble23 on Nov 7, 2005 1:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is very, very good reason to believe that after the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980's, Iran's hardline Islamic government sent agents into the Shi'ite dominated southern region of Iraq in hopes of toppling Saddam'a regime. Not convinced? Consider this, the prominent political party in Iran is called the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iran (SCIRI). The leading political party in Iraq's southern province, which is the party that most if not all the politicians in that region belong to, is aptly titled the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, also (SCIRI). Now this could easily be disregarded as coincidence, but the Sunni's sure don't think so. I have also read testimony from those familiar with the Iraqi version of the SCIR, that many in the party's hierarchy speak Arabic with a distinct Persian accent. If the U.S. pulls out now, and the provinces disengage from one another (and you could bet the farm that they will), Iran will look to absorb the entire southern portion of Iraq. This very plausible scenario leaves the Sunni's in an extremely difficult position since they will be cut off from the Arab coalition. Additionally, nearly all of Iraq's oil deposits lie in the Kurdish north and Shi'ite south; neither of whom hold the Sunni's in very high regard. In other words, the central Sunni district will be without a viable GNP, and surrounded by enemies. Now one might say: Why should we care? Well, if a larger, wealthier, and nuclear capable Iran is of no concern to you then I should just end this commentary right now because I'm wasting my time. If these extremely possible scenarios are not enough, then consider the intercepted correspondence from Ayman Al-Zawahiri to Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi, in which, he explicitly and quite frankly outlines Al-Qaeda's fundamental Islamic plan for the Mid- East region: a radical Islamic empire under the direction of a pre-medieval caliphate. Perhaps not tomorrow, or even five years from now; but eventually, after who knows how many years of regional conflict, this is a very real possibility. At some point, the U.S., Israel, and much of the West, will face an archaic radical Salafist empire, with many bones to pick and scores to settle.
This is my perception of "chaos" Mr. Zinn, and perhaps it will never happen, or maybe not to this severe degree. But a definite fall-out will ensue. One far greater than what currently exists if we withdraw prematurely.--Continued Below

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the answers Mr. Zinn?
Posted by: eDubble23 on Nov 7, 2005 1:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps you will dismiss my approximations as youthful arrogance, or even over analyses. Perhaps. But Iraq is no Vietnam, not even close. I haven't read either of your books, however, I am going to purchase them both tomorrow as you are very popular around college campuses here in California. May I just say for the record, that I greatly admire your bold opinions and challenges to the status quo, they are very important to a healthy and ever evolving free society.

Keep it real,
E.H.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Redundancy
Posted by: eDubble23 on Nov 8, 2005 1:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sovereignty and Autonomy are pretty much the same thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]