Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Snake-Oil President

By Timothy Karr, TomPaine.com. Posted October 17, 2005.


Having quadrupled the PR budget of any previous administration, the Bush Team has broken federal propaganda laws on numerous occasions.
Advertisement

Treating policy as product to be marketed to the electorate is no great stretch for a president who fashions himself the CEO of White House Inc. But in its zeal to promote sales of the Bush brand, this administration has crossed the line that separates honest brokers from snake oil salesmen.

Bush and company sold Americans defective goods in clear violation of federal law. Yet Attorney General Alberto Gonzales hasn't budged. Instead, the man charged with enforcing our laws has tasked his army of lawyers to throw a legal shield around the White House, telling the administration to ignore investigations by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which repeatedly has blasted Team Bush for using taxpayer money to fund "covert propaganda."

In its latest report, issued on Sept. 30, the GAO's federal auditors scolded the White House for squandering American tax dollars to hire fake news reporters and unleash a pre-packaged new blitz in advance of the 2004 elections. The GAO found the White House violated the law by hiring pundit Armstrong Williams to shower praise on Bush's education initiative, the No Child Left Behind Act, while interviewing administration officials on the air.

The GAO also uncovered a previously undisclosed case in which the Education Department commissioned an article carried by several newspapers that extolled the administration's role in promoting science education. Readers were not informed of the government's role in the writing of the article.

The Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 forbids the domestic dissemination of government-authored propaganda or "official news" deliberately designed to influence public opinion or policy. The law singles out materials that serve "a solely partisan purpose." The GAO has now found on at least four separate occasions that administration agencies violated this and other federal restrictions when they disseminated news written by the government or its contractors without disclosing the conflict of interest.

In 2003, the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy produced for local newscasts eight "video news releases" that praised Bush's plan for preventing teen drug use. They were beamed into more than 22 million households via nearly 300 local television stations. Around the same time, the Department of Health and Human Services contracted PR industry professional Karen Ryan to pose as a local news reporter giving the administration's Medicare plan "an A-plus." The resulting fake news segment was broadcast by more than 40 local newscasts. In both cases, these video news releases broke the law by not disclosing the government as their source.

It's more than likely that the White House has set other propaganda efforts loose in the media mainstream. We just don't know about them yet. A January report by members of the House Committee on Government Reform noted that this administration has set aside a quarter billion in taxpayer dollars for similar propaganda efforts -- spending money on PR at four times the rate of any previous administration.


Digg!

Timothy Karr is the author of MediaCitizen, a weblog about the future of America's media. He is the campaign director of Free Press. From September 2003 through February 2005, Karr was executive director of MediaChannel.org and Media for Democracy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Crimes
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 17, 2005 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Would someone answer me just one question? What is worse: (A): Using tax payer dollars to illegaly pay off a journalist to spread a bunch of lies about a quarter-baked educational program or (B): Lying about having an affair with a half-witted intern? Which of the two would you view as an impeachable offence?

If your answer to the question was A, congradulations! You have proven yourself to be an astute observer of civic affairs with an undeniable grasp of the constitution.

If your answer to the question was B, congradulations! You have proven yourself to be an astute observer of civic affairs with and undeniable grasp of the constitution.....No you havn't. I was being sarcastic. In fact you probably shouldn't be voting at all but that's another story.

Now that we have established, beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Bush administration's crimes are worse, far worse than the crimes of Bill Clinton, what would be the next logical step? I was just wondering.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Crimes Posted by: paulaH
» RE: Crimes Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Crimes Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Crimes Posted by: adp3d
» RE: Crimes Posted by: churchofone
Laws and the Republican Criminals Who Break Them
Posted by: kww355 on Oct 17, 2005 4:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This "news" should surprise nobody.

This regime broke the law by stealing not one but TWO elections, outing Valerie Plame, conveniently ignoring the Geneva Convention, and so on...ad nauseam. Breaking federal propaganda laws is a walk in the park for these ba$tards.

But it's all just a matter of timing. After they finish packing SCOTUS with their cronies, they will be able to subvert the laws to their own ends, legally.

Come to think of it, why do they need to break federal propaganda laws when they have Faux News to do it for them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Which Has Me To Thinking....
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 17, 2005 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll bet you anything that when all the dust is settled and the whole truth is finally known, it will turn out that Judy Miller was also on the White House's payroll. What evidence do I have? Nothing - only an educated guess. After all, it would only stand to reason. As Mark Felt never said (except in the movie version of All The President's Men): " Follow The Money". Follow it we will.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This doesn't surprise me either
Posted by: nosylae on Oct 17, 2005 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I read this article, I did not have that, "Holy Crap, what will they get away with now" moment. This did not surprise me one bit. And you know what else wouldn't surprise me? If the GOP and all their cronies tried to blame this on Clinton. When in doubt, blame Bill Clinton. Works like a charm! I actually have a conservative friend who still thinks that Bill and Hillary had Vince Foster killed!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sleight of Hand - Yet Again!
Posted by: mrsmagoo on Oct 17, 2005 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more the truth comes out, the more lies they tell! Isn't it interesting that as soon as this administration's problems become news again, we have the earthquake or the hurricanes and the possibility of the "pandemic" of the bird flu. And George keeps recycling his the 9/11-Iraq connection to his public embarassment! Sleight of hand. Look over here while we lie to you over there. Find something to take our focus off all the lies and illegal activities this administration is guilty of. The truth will come out eventually for this sleazy bunch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sleight of Hand - Yet Again! Posted by: Johanna Moren
Isn't is interesting that the Administration
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Oct 17, 2005 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has delcared a war on poverty programs...but sees fit to triple the budget on dubious and probably illegal PR activities.

That's compassionate conservatism?

But back to my point, the so-called budget conscious Bush boys have invented this thing called PART that you need to know about. Then think about these expenditures and relax because your pulse will spike.

A closer look at the Administration's contempt for federal programs (not PR related): "Mismanagement by Objective."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Should Put the US in a Rage...
Posted by: decembrist on Oct 17, 2005 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but it hasn't. The triple humiliation of being told what to think by our government, being told what to think by our govenrment without our knowing it, and having our tax dollars spent by our government to tell us what to think has failed to arouse any sense of outrage in most of the US.

Not long ago there was a study that asked high school kids whether the government should be able to censor the media - and the majority of kids said YES!

What I believe has happened is that support and trust of the media has run so low, that the majority of Americans don't give a damn who is propogandizing them - the government, the corporations, or religious institutions - because they believe the media is already dominated by these entities... and in many cases they are right.

Take FOX news - an obviously partisan cable news broadcaster... people know that's what they are - they know they're getting news that's directly in line with GOP talking points, and FOX news viewers are all too ready to trust that GOP talking points are in line with reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The US is an Oligarcal Plutocracy that has a wartime economy.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Oct 17, 2005 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't it true that statesmen have to buy their way into office with big money. Most are already very wealthy millionaires on both sides. We regularly accept politicians as liars. We the people were warned by the founder of this nation to stay informed and ever vigilant if we, the people wanted to continue to stay the real owners of this nation. We have failed miserably.

Neo-Corporatists have been the driving force behind PNAC's Wolfowitz doctrine, and in Zbigniew Brzezinski's "The Grand Chessboard", that the US will be the world's first and last global empire, leaving way to a world run by corporate and military elites. Now it is the average Joes and Janes that will get to pay for leading a life of ignorance.

It's interesting how Eisenhower saw it coming and gave us all warnings to be ever vigilent against the military-industrial complex, but few have taken it seriously. Corporatism (the new military-industrial complex), has a stark idea of what world peace in the New World Order will look like. The End of Times religious cult want to pour it on. My greatest hope is that more people will come to reject the canned main stream media and do some research about what is happening in our world and especially our country. A nation that has been built on money laundering and military aggression for the sake of the corporate elite that use both, for the last 150 years, makes for a bleak future for everyone except for the ruling class.

PNAC, the Wolfowitz doctrine, and Zbigniew Brzezinski's "The Grand Chessboard" provide the information of the current situation. The Bush administration, Senate, Congress, Pentagon and Intelligence agencies are fully behind this strategy (how many speak out against the war?). I believe that the majority of Americans see it that way too per the majority of responses to my letters to media, blogs and interactive news groups. We lost our chance for peace at the end of the Soviet Union and now have created a bigger boogy man ready to take away what rights and liberties that we had left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crimes
Posted by: La Fargian on Oct 17, 2005 2:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After Bush and Cheney and the Administration ( if that is possible) we would have to go down the chain of command in the House, Hastert, DeLay (if he isn't already gone), Blunt (or whatever). How far would we have to go to get to a decent Repbulican that could take over. The Democrats are not in the running I don't think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Feeding Frenzy
Posted by: shangrilalad on Oct 17, 2005 2:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Feeding Frenzy

How can anyone not be overwhelmed by the Bush Corp. tsunami of corruption? Well, anyone who can read that is. Many who don’t read the handful of newspapers that actually report what’s going on are spared the frightening spectacle of a feeding frenzy in our nation’s capitol. Like sharks circling schools of bait fish, republican politicians and corporations are ripping into our National Treasury with a ferocity that puts great whites to shame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Power corrupts, etc.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Oct 17, 2005 5:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as Bush and company can hold together a coalition of people who have one overriding issue, religion, with the corporations which have one overriding issue, profit, they will remain unbeatable. Until there is an absolute division between church and state, and business and state, forget about Democracy. We are up against a partnership of two entities that don't care about the other's goal so long as each supports the other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's the way business is done in the US and the world these days.
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 17, 2005 9:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do you suppose it was possible for Orwell to write "1984" and accurately predict everything from perpetual war to Big Brother watching you?

It's the logic of the so-called free market, whose most passionate goal is always monopoly. Debeers diamonds. Gates' Microsoft. Mainstream media. Allowing corporations to game the system has gotten perfected so that they now know how to prepare for every eventuality.

After all, how much does a politician cost these days? Hedge funds on the brink? Too big to fail. Business drooping? Start a war and make the tax payer pick up the tab.

But they're too dumb to do anything about global warming. That's too big to control. And it'll do them and most of us in before long. As Siberia Melts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]