Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Mr. Bush Goes to Tikrit (Sort-of)

By Jeremy Scahill, AlterNet. Posted October 14, 2005.


Yesterday's presidential videoconference 'from' Tikrit was a crude example of the kind of propaganda Iraqis have lived with for years. But this time, the target audience was Americans.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Jeremy Scahill

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Just when you think that President Bush couldn't out-Saddam Saddam any more, he goes and does something that proves you wrong.

If any Iraqis caught the hilarious October 13 videoconference between Bush (at the White House) and troops from the 42nd Infantry Division in Tikrit, it may have seemed like a high-tech version of a familiar scene from the old days, when Saddam used to travel to Tikrit to feel (and, more importantly, to have others feel) his greatness.

The videoconference was a display of just how far the propaganda system has come since Bush took over from Saddam. Instead of visiting Tikrit, which the president lightly acknowledged he could not safely do, Bush addressed -- via satellite -- an adoring bunch of U.S. soldiers that had apparently been given a heavy dose of Kool-Aid before the telecast began.

Oh, there was one Iraqi there--Sergeant Major Akeel from the 5th Iraqi Army Division, whose role in the affair was limited to smiling like a good Iraqi and saying to Bush, "I like you."

Under Saddam, Iraqis were bombarded via their TVs with video of the Iraqi leader meeting his generals in Tikrit, overseeing military parades, listening intently to his commanders, examining their weapons, firing a rifle here, swinging a sword there. For Iraqis, Tikrit represented the mother of all locations for the regime's propaganda commercial shoots. Few were those Iraqis chosen to be in Saddam's midst for these staged commercials, but at least Saddam actually went there.

Two and a half years after the U.S. occupation began, there stood President Bush at his podium in the White House -- in front of a massive plasma TV, holding an earpiece to his head (out in the open this time). Before him, beamed in by satellite, were the 10 handpicked soldiers. They sat in three rows, fawning over Bush and delivering glowing assessments of the situation on the ground.

At one point, it seemed as if one of the soldiers, Master Sergeant Corine Lombardo, was lifting from one of Bush's "major addresses" on Iraq when she told the president, "We began our fight against terrorism in the wake of 9/11, and we're proud to continue it here."

It turns out that the soldiers had actually been coached by Pentagon official Allison Barber before the event, and were given Bush's questions in advance. At one point during the coaching, which was caught on videotape, Barber asked, "Who are we going to give that [question] to?"

At another point, she suggests the phrase, "Sir, together we are working on ..." for a response to a question on cooperation between U.S. and Iraqi troops.

For much of the videoconference, Bush played Fox's Brit Hume as he "interviewed" the soldiers. A telling moment came when Bush asked the troops, "As you move around, I presume you have a chance to interface with the civilians there in that part of the world. And a lot of Americans are wondering whether or not people appreciate your presence, or whether or not the people are anxious to be part of the democratic process. Can you give us a sense for the reception of the people there in Tikrit toward coalition forces, as well as the Iraqi units that they encounter?"

It seems that Bush's presumption about his troops "interfacing" with "civilians in that part of the world" about their anxiousness to "be part of the democratic process" was a pipedream.

Captain David Williams responded by telling Bush, "Sir, I was with my Iraqi counterpart in Tikrit, the city Tikrit last week, and he was going around, talking to the locals. And from what he told me that the locals told him, the Iraqi people are ready and eager to vote in this referendum."

Those sentiments, relayed second-hand from Williams' "Iraqi counterpart," are contradicted by most independent assessments, to which the White House would never dare listen. Furthermore, it provides yet another example of how detached from reality Bush and his minions in Iraq truly are.

There is a simple reason most U.S. soldiers aren't out there chewing the fat with Iraqi "civilians," chatting about how great democracy is: Iraqis overwhelmingly do not want U.S. troops there.

"[Iraqis] aren't sitting in their front rooms discussing the referendum on the constitution," veteran war correspondent Robert Fisk recently said. "The reality now in Iraq is the project is finished. Most of Iraq, except Kurdistan, is in a state of anarchy." Furthermore, the Sunni Arabs of Tikrit, where the soldiers sat during the videoconference, is almost certain to vote a resounding "No" on the U.S.-backed constitution.

And herein lies one of the big farces of Bush's videoconference, and the broader narrative the president needs so desperately to be true. The fact is that Washington will never be able to manufacture a multi-ethnic Iraqi military that is somehow going to deliver or enforce "democracy, American style" in time for the U.S. to withdraw from the bloody, sinking ship that is the Iraq occupation.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Jeremy Scahill is an independent journalist and a correspondent for the national radio and TV show Democracy Now! He can be reached at jeremy@democracynow.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bush's Brother helped plan the 9-11 terrorist attacks
Posted by: nitsua1023 on Oct 14, 2005 3:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The FBI doesn't care. They know about the "threat"

Seven of the 19 hijackers from 9-11 are alive and well in Saudi Arabia. Funny, you'd think they would have died when the planes hit the towers. The FBI doesn't even care to change their story. Who was head of security for the WTC on 9-11? Marvin Bush. Who completely cleared out each floor of the WTC in the months prior to 9-11 to shut down power, which of course leaves no surveilance footage. Marvin Bush. Why does NOT ONE airport video show the supposed hijackers in any airport on 9-11? Where is all the security footage? Why do demolition experts say the towers fell in a way that "couldn't have been planned better"? Why do fireman who risked their lives that morning say bombs were going off, 40 stories lower than where the plane hit.

The first plane to hit the towers was a cargo plane, not passenger. The towers were brought down with bombs, not planes. The pentagon was hit by a missile, not a plane. Flight 93 was brought down with a missile. George Bush already knew this when he was nervously sitting in a FL classroom, reading an upside-down book to a class full of kids. There is no terrorist threat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where did you get your info? Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: Where did you get your info? Posted by: nitsua1023
» RE: Where did you get your info? Posted by: nitsua1023
» Thank you Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
Huh?????
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 14, 2005 3:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is a textbook example as to how mind-numbingly, jaw-droppingly, fucking stupid these people are: As I was watching the conference yesterday, I couldn't help but notice that after the first soldier answered the First Fool's first question, he immediately handed the microphone over to the soldier who answered the second question - BEFORE THE FIRST FOOL HAD EVEN ASKED IT!!!!!

Now had I been there (if you can give your imagination a real stretch for a second and imagine me working for these assholes) I would have said, "Well, gee, this is going to look REALLY obvious". I would have then suggested seperate lavalier or one condenser mic. It's sadly revealing that not not of these idiots had the sense to figure that out. Oy!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Huh????? Posted by: Captainmagic
Doubly scripted
Posted by: Dylan F. on Oct 14, 2005 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"... Bush asked the troops, 'As you move around, I presume you have a chance to interface with the civilians there in that part of the world.' "

We all know that George can't hang a noun and a verb together, much less the sentences contained in that more extensive quote! "Presume... interface?" Give me a break!

Don't our troops (who should be home anyway) have better things to do than be sucked into spending taxpayer money on political ads for our President?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Doubly scripted Posted by: loony
» RE: Doubly scripted Posted by: Jennifer
» RE: Doubly scripted Posted by: adp3d
I'M LOOKING FORWARD
Posted by: krose on Oct 14, 2005 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm looking forward to seeing this as a skit on "SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'M LOOKING FORWARD Posted by: DennisDalrymple
» Saturday night live skit YES! Posted by: Michiganman
well researched websites on 9/11
Posted by: billyboy43 on Oct 14, 2005 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://dailybeacon.utk.edu/showarticle.php?articleid=48804

There are large, professionally researched volumes of information on the truth of 9-11 all over the Internet. I suggest visiting Mike Ruppert’s “From the Wilderness” Web site (http://www.fromthewilderness.com/) and the 9-11-Truth Web site (http://www.911truth.org/). Both offer such convincing objective evidence, and so many supporting sources, that only the most stubbornly brain-washed still believe our government’s fascinating tale once they’ve done their own investigating.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The media is the bigger problem
Posted by: ccbite on Oct 14, 2005 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're in Iraq and we f-d it up. Whether it was an illegal war is now a moot point; we're there and we need to 'fix' it as best as we can since we started it. Them's the consequences. But trying to PR your way out of it, is not going to help. Unless the media thought they were exposing this lame charade, I think it is the media's responsibility to shut the cameras off. How dare they pimp this as 'news'! Once again we need to ask: How obedient can the media become? Can they go any lower? And the fact that the administration thinks they can pull it off is the height of arrogance and cynicism. They think they can PR their way out of the box.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1-800-DUH
Posted by: NamVeT on Oct 14, 2005 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wag the dog...wag the dog...wag the dog. I can't believe that this administration can possibly think that the American public is that stupid. I hope that this whole halibush administration comes crashing down in flames so bright that they can be seen all the way to Iraq! How anyone ANYONE! can still support this fucking idiot and his cronies is beyond any reasoning that my poor little brain can come up with! It's definately time to throw all of them morons in the jailhouse. george (no caps intentional) halibush should be drawn and quartered and put on display for all to see, so that this kind of criminal bullshit would never happen again. I'm disgusted beyond belief. And I am aghast that some in this country still support these backstabbing worthless excuses for human beings!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Propganda IS America
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Oct 14, 2005 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just because Darth Dubya aimed some new blast at us from his Telehole does'nt mean it's a 'first' or 'new' practice. Back in the 30's it was Blacks and Mexicans 'hopped up' on marijuana. The 50's it was herion freaks. The 60's civil rights workers,social justice groups,anti-war protestors and Hippies.
The 70's OPEC, The 80's AIDS. The 90's bush 1 and blow-jobs. Now Bush 2, 9/11, lies,failures and down right arrogance. The thing is our Govt,or more precisely,the rich who run it and all World govts, need 'enemies'. Someone to point the finger at, harp about and generally misdirect your attention from what they are really doing. You can't escalate a budget unless you need a reason. For some stupid reason
we make enemies up and create things like WW1,WW2,Korea,
Vietnam, Angloa,Lebanon,Peru, Nicaragua,Guatamala,
Hondurous,Panama, Desert Storm, and The Global War On the Poor,oops I'm sorry, Terrorism. Propaganda is all important to this kind of crap. It plays to the people that feel that the 'elected ones' will lead us. It plays to the ones who think it might not be right but it's better than anything else.
Hell it even plays in Peoria. We as a people have to stop giving our judgement and reasoning over to these pinheads.
Most of us know how to get along better than any of our so-called leaders. If we were shown just what the real policies of this country were,we'd say 'There's no way you're pulling this
on us or anyone else." The problem is they keep us in the dark.Some of us don't care. Most of us are so busy just trying to survive we can't keep tabs on these clones. Because it's made that way. When you have a document that says The People are Leadership,the greedy set about the mechenisms
to centralize the wealth and power securing it away from The People. It's been that way since they signed the Declaration.
By the way,those signators were considered 'Terrorists' to
the British Crown,King George III,just for wanting their own life. Not too diffrent than our G3 and Iraq. But since all the land's been craved up for years,we now go for the underground resources. The only way to stop propaganda is
to come up with an 'absolute truth' constant that is judged by ALL the World's People and if you raft of crap still floats,
then we might go for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New GOP Tele-ganda
Posted by: Mycos on Oct 14, 2005 5:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take a look at this new effort from the GOP.
In The Know
The sure have some balls, considering that they were just found guilty of using propaganda in the Armstrong Williams(?) affair. So what do they do? Set straight out and do a complete newscast. Sure, it's on the GOP site now. But they've removed all indication of their involvement in their production during their run. It's only afterwards, on a separate piece of tape spliced into it, that they reveal their part. Their hope is that these segments will make it into other forums where that attribution will be missing. Pure sleaze....

Mycos

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: New GOP Tele-ganda Posted by: adp3d