Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

A Bipartisan Brothel With a Revolving Door

By David Sirota, Huffington Post. Posted October 14, 2005.


Washington is nothing more than a bordello -- where politicians are the prostitutes, lobbyists are the customers, and the door spins faster as the two switch places.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
7 Reasons for Atheists to Celebrate the Holidays
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
10 Ways to Screw Over the Corporate Jackals Who've Been Screwing You
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Congress Gets Its Act Together: Repeals Ban on Syringe Exchange Funding, Allows D.C. to Enact Medical Marijuana Program
Bill Piper, Naomi Long

Environment:
Copenhagen Talks End With Agreement, But No Binding Deal: So, How Screwed Are We?

Food:
Quitting Meat Is at the Heart of 2009's Health Zeitgeist, And Author Kathy Freston Is Leading the Debate

Health and Wellness:
Health Care Reform Is Not Reform If It Denies Women Coverage
John Nichols

Immigration:
Immigration Police Are Keeping Secret Jails on U.S. Soil
Jacqueline Stevens

Media and Technology:
Is Handwriting Going the Way of the Dodo?
Anne Trubek

Movie Mix:
James Cameron's Wizardry in 'Avatar' Movie Demands Being Witnessed on the Big Screen
Wajahat Ali

Politics:
Howard Dean Is a Genuine Hero: Taking on Corporate 'Centrists' Like Lieberman
David Sirota

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Can Boob Jobs Serve the Public Good?
Alexandra Suich

Rights and Liberties:
Pockets of White America Are in the Throes of an Existential Crisis
Rich Benjamin

Sex and Relationships:
Guess What? Casual Sex Won't Make You Go Insane
Ellen Friedrichs

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
NASA Report Highlights Need to Retire Drainage Impaired Land in California
Dan Bacher

World:
$57,077.60 -- That's What We're Paying Each Minute for the Occupation of Afghanistan
Jo Comerford

More stories by David Sirota

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The Montana Standard has a poignant editorial today that shows how the pay-to-play system in politics is now afflicting both political parties -- and how there is an alternative to it all.

The paper correctly notes that the bipartisan legalized bribery system in Washington, D.C. has gotten down to a scientific formula: "Work for a congressman for a few years, leave to start a private consulting firm, pick up a few large corporate clients, and have those clients donate money back to the senators' campaigns."

In other words, Washington, D.C. is one big brothel with a gilded revolving door for an entry -- politicians are the prostitutes, lobbyists are the customers, and the door spins faster and faster as the two seamlessly switch places.

You have to read no further than the Associated Press' recent expose on the pay-to-play system to know that this description is a fact. And it is a fact even when it comes to the policy areas that should be most off-limits to this kind of corruption. As the Los Angeles Times recently reported, "lobbyists representing transportation, energy and other special interests dominated panels that advised Louisiana's U.S. senators" -- Mary Landrieu (D) and David Vitter (R) -- who were "crafting legislation to rebuild the storm-damaged Gulf Coast."

Democrats, not surprisingly, are trying to make the recent corruption scandals surrounding Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX) and Sen. Bill Frist (R-TN) into a major 2006 issue, as they should. The problem is, there are those in their midst who are still playing footsie with this "culture" themselves. Just this week, for instance, Montana Sen. Max Baucus (D) got caught using an Abramoff-connected goon to help him raise money. To put it mildly, that's not helpful to Democrats working to position themselves as reformers.

This is why mere rhetoric berating a "culture of corruption" just isn't going to cut it for Democrats if they want to really make all of this an issue in 2006. It is going to take action and an actual change of behavior among Democratic poiliticians. The Montana Standard notes this very fact and points out at least one politician who is taking concrete steps to crackdown on the pay-to-play shenanigans. In contrast to Montana's congressional delegation, Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D) has taken a stand by declaring "he won't employ registered lobbyists in state government." Schweitzer is also planning to push a statewide ballot initiative to force the legislature to accept commonsense lobbying and ethics reform.

Similarly, at least some courageous Democrats in Washington, D.C. seem to get the need for action. For instance, Rep. George Miller (D) is pushing a proposal to crackdown on lobbyist gifts to lawmakers, while Sen. Russ Feingold (D) has proposed a bill closing abusive lobbying loopholes.

The truth is, the public believes most politicians are corrupt -- and with lobbying now becoming a multi-billion-dollar industry, the public is clearly right. Unless the Democratic Party as a whole endorses and publicly promotes its support for concrete lobbying/ethics reforms, the public will only blame the GOP for getting caught, not for necessarily being worse than their opponents. Democrats have to give the public a reason to throw the Republicans out, and the only way to do that is to show the public how Democrats would be substantively different from the GOP in terms of cleaning up our government.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

David Sirota was the top spokesman for Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee. He is currently writing a book on the middle class economic squeeze for Crown Publishers. You can contact him at Davidsirota.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement