Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

10 Pledges to Demand from Democrats

By Stephen Pizzo, News for Real. Posted October 13, 2005.


If Dems win in the 2006 and 2008 elections, but fail to define what they stand for, the country will be no better off. Here's how Democrats can again become a great party.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Stephen Pizzo

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The current issue of The Nation magazine contains an important essay by Bob Borosage, head of the Center for America's Future. Like many of us, Bob has spent the last few years watching in awe and shock as the Democrats triangulated themselves into irrelevancy. With there being no realistic hope a viable progressive third part will emerge he and other progressive thinkers have been trying to figure out how to round up our wayward mule team and get it hitched back to the right wagon.

Bob's article, "A *Real* Contract With America," is an important step in that direction. In it he lays out a set of clear pledges Democrat candidates can embrace in the upcoming '06 and '08 races.

Such a "contract" is critical if Democrats are going to once again become a great party, and here's why. Democrats will regain some seats in both houses in coming elections. How could they not, considering the mess the GOP has made of things since becoming the majority party? And therein lies the entire current platform of the Democrat Party -- "Vote for us because we are not them."

But winning only because the other team committed too many errors is not the same thing as governing. It's simply being the only other alternative -- the lesser of evils. And that's not a foundation upon which greatness can be built.

You hear it every day in Washington: "Democrats have no ideas, no programs, no deeply held beliefs, no lines in the sand they will not cross." The only discernible passion Democrats display is a passion to be in power again. But in power to do what? You tell me. I have no friggin idea, and I deeply suspect neither do they.

That's why we need to force them to sign a contract with us this time. To put it bluntly, we don't trust them any longer. They've double-crossed at every major moment -- on war, on taxes, on the environment, on health care. They took or votes and our hopes and bargained them away to the enemy for the political equivalent of nylons, smokes and chocolate bars.

So I took the points Bob listed in his article, "embellished" them and put them into the form of 10 contractual pledges Democrat candidates can and should embrace. (To see Bob's original -- un-Pizzo'ed -- list click here.) Here is my list, which began as Bob's list, and will hopefully become every Democrat's list:

A Progressive Contract With America

If elected to office I promise to fully, enthusiastically and aggressively work to pass legislation that achieves the following goals:

We Will Bring the Troops Home. Our military has been stretched to the breaking point through a series of unwise deployments, particularly the war in Iraq. We will begin rebuilding America's all-volunteer military by first setting a date-certain for withdrawal from Iraq, beginning with National Guard and reservists. We will pass legislation requiring US troops begin leaving Iraq at the rate of 15,000 a month. We will work as closely as possible with Iraqi government officials to make this withdraw orderly while continuing to provide them the resources needed to train and equip their own soldiers and police forces.

We Will Crack Down on Corruption. The revolving door between corporate lobbies and high public office must be closed. We will pass legislation prohibiting legislators, their senior aides and executive branch political appointees from lobbying for two years after leaving office. We will let the sun shine into the deepest corners by requiring detailed public reporting of all contacts between lobbyists and legislators and the timely posting of such contacts on the Web. We pledge to apply these rules to all, regardless of party, as one way to take big money out of politics.

We Will Make Public Officials Accountable. When public officials fail to do their job, as in the pre-9/11 and WMD intellegence faliures, we will require an independent investigation be launched so that no official's actions, regardless of rank or position, escapes review. We will detail action on the urgent needs that this Administration has ignored: Improve port security, bolster first responders and public health capacity, and require adequate defense planning by high-risk chemical plants. And we will attack fraud, waste and abuse, beginning with the pork-barrel squandering of national security funds.

We Will Unleash New Energy for America. We understand that the "age of oil," is nearing an end. Therefore we pledge to launch and fund a concerted drive towards real energy independence for America. We must approach this task with the same sense of urgency, funding and attention that the nation gave to the Manhattan Project. We will focus these efforts solely on mainstreaming renewable, non-polluting sources of energy such as hydrogen, wind and solar, with the goal of achieving total energy independence no later than 2020.


Digg!

Stephen Pizzo is the author of numerous books, including "Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans," which was nominated for a Pulitzer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
good lord...
Posted by: drone on Oct 13, 2005 1:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if this is the Dems best game, they're still toast. Many of us who left this party aren't going back for lukewarm proposals like this: health care by 2015? Get serious, we'll be dead by then. Raising the minimum wage to make the American Dream accessible?Are you joking? Do you honestly think the Dream is only a buck or so away from reality? Is there anyone publishing op-eds making less than 40k a year???? At this point, raising the minimum wage makes people less poor, but no closer to ownership of anything than 5 bucks an hour.

Show some understanding of the forces that got us in this predicament to begin with. Even if all of this stuff passed in some coherent, substantive form, as long as private firms have citizenship rights, this will all be rolled back as soon as the next politico needs a contribution to the war chest. nader's right: if you don't introduce something to curb the accumulation of state power in private hands, then this is all a pipe dream, because the second you pass anything, the usual suspects will begin pouring millions into rolling it right back.

I want a serious attempt to go in another direction, and this platform isn't, in my view, very serious. It still reeks of the cowardice that has plagued the Dems for several years now.

I have a better idea: get rid of the Dems. Leave them, let them choke on their own betrayal. Let's make stronger demands from parties that will be more than happy to get in the ring with the fascists. Get rid of corporate protection and citizenship entirely, get rid of the privatizing of the commons entirely, get rid of this notion that the only way we can live well is to subject ourselves to the economic domination of capital. Get rid of this half-assed "I like capitalism, but I wish it weren't so darned mean" milquetoast politics that continues to pervade the political opposition to the Right.

This platform is weak, because it won't say what it wants to say--what it needs to say--because the people who write up this crap are still afraid of taking on private power and risking their own privilege. I'll take the red and green platforms, thank you, since they're actually alternatives to the Republican experiment. Dems cannot, and ore importantly, will not, compete with that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How I agree with you Posted by: sausage
» RE: good lord... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Opting Out. Posted by: SanFranDuke
not strong enough
Posted by: bikerdude on Oct 13, 2005 3:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with "good lord" on most of what was said, but I don't believe that a third party option will be a winnable solution.
On the other hand, the dems who are peeking out of the barrel this time are woefully weak on addressing corporate welfare, favoritism towards the wealthy and most importantly a strong, strategic stand to end this war immediately.
I do like the idea that any/all candidates must sign "a pledge" to stay to a stated course.l
Here's what I think should be the minimum effort to end this war immediately:

How to stop the war in Iraq
The war in Iraq was started by a group of people in the current administration who took information, converted it to "intelligence" and then used it as justification to preemptively attack Iraq.
Subsequent revelations indicate that the information upon which this war was started were false or improperly assessed.
Then the strategy changed with a variety of justifications to basically, "We are there already. We must stay the course" None of this makes sense. We are losing lives daily. We are spending tax dollars in ways that indicate that there is no strategic plan that we are executing. Billions of dollars have been stolen, for instance, and no one has been held accountable.
Now the latest information from Great Britain, our strongest ally in this war, is that they plan to withdraw their troops in May of 2006.
The United States Government must do the following immediately to end this war:
a. Make an announcement that control of the war will be turned over to the Iraqi on a specific date.
b. Formulate a plan that will permit the world governments to participate in helping the Iraqi keep the peace.
c. Show the strength of our conviction by starting troop withdrawl immediately, with significant numbers early on.
d. Offer plans in the world organizations like the United Nations and Organization of Arabian States that give them ideas and actions that they can take to help the Iraq citizens protect themselves.
e. Begin hearings that will identify and prosecute those within our government who created this mass deception that led us into such a tragic and unwinnable war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: not strong enough Posted by: John Rice
» RE: not strong enough Posted by: drone
Thr Dang Dems
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 13, 2005 3:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's the deal: I was a life long Democrat - even before I knew it. I'm 47 years old now so that makes me just old enough to remember the assasination of Presisent Kennedy and be personally affected by it. Four and a half years later just two months before my 9th birthday, his brother Bobby was cut down in the kitchen of the Ambassador Hotel in LA and I thought that the wheels were coming off of the world. The Democrats stood for something then. They don't anymore. The final nail in the coffin was 2000 when they nominated Al Gore over the far-more qualified and idealogically consisitant Bill Bradley. I joined the Green Party and never looked back - I even ran for NY State Senate in 2002.

The Democrats have a second chance now. But they must reconnect with their traditional constituency (read: ME). Whoever's nominated in 2008 has got to learn the lesson of Gore and Kerry: Don't try to run as a republican!!!! Believe me, by November of that year the American pepole will have had it up to here (please take note: I'm pointing at my forehead) with these right wing half wits that have plundered our national treasure and destroyed the social infrastructure of this country. Read my lips: RONALD REAGAN IS DEAD AND HIS HIDEOUS "REVOLUTION" IS OVER", relagated to history's trash can. Do you get it? They've got to run as - pardon my French - LIBERALS - OK, we've got to come up with another word. The repuplicans have turned "liberal" into an explative. PROGRESSIVES! Is that easier to say? Go on, try saying it. It's easy. Franklin D. Roosevelt never pretended to be anything else and he won the 1932 election and he won it big. Do you know why? Because by November of that year, after twelve years of republican mismanagement and greed, the American people had had it up to here (again with the forehead) with their crimes.

Let's take America back!

On that happy note....

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thr Dang Dems Posted by: Rod in 83706
adp3d
Posted by: adp3d on Oct 13, 2005 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't forget about liberating the peoples lands that have been stolen by industry and developers. And for Gods sake no more bailouts for those who continue to build on environmently unstable areas like earthquake zones, flood plains, barrier islands, seaside eroding cliffs and fire prone woodlands and canyons. However, we must restore and protect New Orleans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: adp3d Posted by: Jsens
Why Not A Third Party
Posted by: expat in tokyo on Oct 13, 2005 4:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You I have voted democrat since I was old enough to vote. My parents voted democrat and their parents voted democrat. Its part of the Massachusetts tradition. (tom im sure you can relate, im from the berkshires which isnt too far from you)
And my BIG issue is this... why the hell NOT a third party??? Why does everyone already assume its futile. If we can mobilize the voices we did in '04 behind Howard Dean only to have that stolen by the Big Money of the Clintonian democrats.. how can we still go along.. we had a real canidate in Dean.. we raised money for him in a way noone had done before.. mobilized REAL supporters who were PASSIONATE!! And we got sold the F**K out!!! Now why would they ever earn our vote again... after cowing to bush for 8 years??

People who start with the idea that.. well we cant win but lets give a try have ALREADY failed... All these comments.. from the main article to the posters.. in there is the statement... well a third party cant win... its psycholgy.. if you say something over and over again it becomes the truth.. I say.. WHY NOT.. SOMEONE GIVE ME ONE GOOD DAMN REASON.. why cant we organize and raise money and get people EXCITED.. and that excitement will spread to the voters... and thats how you win elections ladies and gentlemen.. who cares if its only 2 or 3 senate seats.. or 4 or 5 house seats.. ok.. they are gonna vote our way anyway right... as much our way as a so called "republican lite" demo would.. but it would be a damn fine start.. then.. when they got the wakeup call.. the dems could try to win us back.. with actions .. not words that are empty cause they know we will vote for them anyway..
LOOK IN YOUR HEARTS PEOPLE>>You know it would work... WHY NOT 2006

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Why stop at three? Posted by: Colin
» RE: Why Not A Third Party Posted by: jobie1kno
» RE: Why Not A Third Party Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Organize Locally, Win Locally Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» RE: Why Not A Third Party Posted by: Bigteam
» RE: Why Not A Third Party Posted by: crusty
» RE: Why Not A Third Party Posted by: Bigteam
» RE: Why Not A Third Party Posted by: crusty
» RE: Why Not A Third Party Posted by: Jarnsaxa
» RE: Why Not A Third Party Posted by: Bigteam
» RE: Why Not A Third Party Posted by: Jarnsaxa
2012 looks good ?
Posted by: okie11 on Oct 13, 2005 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if this is all we got were done, whoever runs for the big prize for 08, needs to look to middle america not the left or right coast and not Ted can i give you ride kennedy. and not mrs clinton they will burn her to the ground.. think TRUMAN

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Other Pledges
Posted by: wobblies on Oct 13, 2005 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi~
I would add the following to the list above and make the following amendments:

* I would end our current relationship with Israel. The policies of that country of occupying the land of another people must stop and we must end our support of the occupation.

*We should develop legislation that provides preference be given to citizens for jobs in this country. That should include the development of a viable I.D. card in order to verify the citizenship of those employees.

*We should end all legislation and tax incentives that send our jobs to other countries or allow the importation of foreign labor to replace Americans.

*We should abolish dual citizenship for Americans. Americans with dual citizenship are being torn in their loyalty to our and other countries. This is an especially important problems for people with dual Israeli or Mexican dual citizenship.

*We should develop universal health care.

*We should be investing billions into alternative energy sources.

I will be late for work if I don't stop, so, please, others should add to the list.

God Speed,

David

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Other Pledges Posted by: Colin
» RE: Other Pledges Posted by: wobblies
» RE: Other Pledges Posted by: robflam
» RE: Other Pledges Posted by: expat in tokyo
» RE: Other Pledges Posted by: wobblies
» RE: Other Pledges Posted by: rhiannonb
» RE: Other Pledges Posted by: wobblies
» RE: Other Pledges Posted by: stoney13
» RE: Other Pledges Posted by: wobblies
peacearmy
Posted by: peacearmy on Oct 13, 2005 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Contract not near strong enough on the environment:
1. it is a crucial issue 2. perhaps it is the defining issue for several million young people.

Kerry would probably have won handily if he had talked passioately (:> about the environment and minimum wage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: peacearmy Posted by: wobblies
» RE: peacearmy Posted by: stoney13
The Missing Ingredient: Honor in Commerce
Posted by: SFRosalyne on Oct 13, 2005 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First and foremost this needs to be added:

I swear if elected that no person or commercial entity shall operate a business in the United States or its Territories and Protectorates without fealty to the United States and its Constitution, nor shall such commercial entities endanger the physical, political or financial security of the United States by their business activities, and furthermore establishes that misuse of financial power is just as treasonable an offense as espionage, sabotage or assassination.

Big Business has had its way far too long, and needless to say, unless we first make our businesses act like patriotic Americans instead of patriots of greed and money, they need to be stripped of wealth and imprisoned as any traitor should be. It is not the State Department diplomats the world sees, but our predaceous corporations. Until we force business to grow up and act civilized, patriotic, law-abiding Americans loyal to America (and not profits) we cannot possibly expect to get the same from government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One size doesn't fit all
Posted by: Marjorie G on Oct 13, 2005 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With whatever list of principles not the same for every sub group within those voting Democrat, or those who might, we can't argue and harp that one size fits all, or should. Although a good list, I am more than tired the mileage columnists get, but mostly readers, who would rather be negative, that we don't stand for anything. That alone supresses any interest.

We stood for plenty in the last election, and passionately, but given media freeze, who would know? John Kerry has fought tirelessly over the years for the environment, fairness in wages, and campaign finance reform with Paul Wellstone before the lesser McCain-Feingold Bill was passed. He's been ranking of the Small Business and pitching today over Katrina aid inequity to small businesses in the areas. He's running around the country saying we can't be GOP-lite, but there is a difference over frightening language and actual policy needs.

There were realities about the security and fear last election, especially the OBL tape the last weekend, as well as the election fraud, that more than explain the result. Despite that Kerry has a real history dealing with the security issues. We did very well in urban areas, but couldn't compete with the direct hate mail. Remember that the media will still play their game of theater, probably Hillary Theater, polls, giving us whatever view we have, ability to bond, sense of charisma, for any of our candidates. Sumner Redstone of Viacom/CBS, a supposed Dem, said Bush was better for his interests, in the wake of the Nat'l Guard story.

If I remember our netroots, and the Boston mayor, they wouldn't abide Kerry not accepting the nomination in July. That left August without resources to fight back, and our own Dems didn't step up to the plate. Next time, our nominees get chosen at the same time with better support.

We need to stop saying we don't stand for anything, which is really a difference of opinion. Do work in election reform, elect our local organization of people with integrity. Stop looking backwards for 3 1/2 years and expect the last 6 months to give us our best able to lead and with good judgment. We are without power in any of the braches of gov't, but gaining more every day. They still have the machinery, so we'll see how much our own willingness to work and be positive allow success.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One size doesn't fit all Posted by: Marjorie G
democrats a great party?
Posted by: dddddd0814 on Oct 13, 2005 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what's all this regressivist, "those-were-the-days" b.s. about the democrats "once" being a great party? when was that? when they represented the slaveholders? when roosevelt denied entry to jews during the holocaust? when hiroshima and nagasaki were bombed with WMD's? when kennedy started a war of genocide against the vietnamese? when clinton commited genocide on iraqis by pushing sanctions through the u.n. the party this guy is thinking of never existed, except for in some fantasy world of yesteryear. the democratic party is the principle reason that working people in the u.s. remain opressed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: democrats a great party? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Demobrats Posted by: kittykat
"We're not them"
Posted by: Crazy H on Oct 13, 2005 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's wrong with that as a slogan? After all, it worked for Dumbya in 2000, his entire platform consisted of "I'm not Al Gore" and he used the same strategy to lead him to his 'victory' in 2004.

In fact, that's seemed to be the whole repug strategy for the last few years. "The other guy's a bum, vote for me!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Throw 50% of the bums out and jail the other 50%, Then start over!
Posted by: ftorres on Oct 13, 2005 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And that's just the Democratic Party! Every one in the GOP, to include the entire executive and judicial branches of government, should be jailed for treason to the Constitution of the United States which reads in part:
"I will defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or DOMESTIC!"

Political offices in the US of A have become institutionized financial careers for the nation's liars, corporate crooks and thieves. Congress, especially this one, has become the last refuge of scoundrels! No one should serve more than 4 years, the first one being on probation. 8 Years is way to much. The moral, well being and the financial structure of a nation, much less a civilization, has been destroyed in less time then that

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Radical Idea
Posted by: Newsguy on Oct 13, 2005 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democrats should guarantee that every high school graduate who wants to go to college should be given a scholarship that would be good as long as he or she keeps his grades up.

Free college would be the best investment this country could ever make.

The Republicans and Dems alike in DC seem to think investing in bombs and guns and jet fighters guarantees security and freedom. No, the best we could do to benefit our country would be to invest in the future of the country.

If we can afford zillions to kill people, we should be able to afford whatever it takes to send our young people to college.

I also think we should lower the voting age to 13, since our kids are going to be paying for Bush's reckless spending and borrowing to pay for his war and tax cuts. But that's a subject for another time. --Newsguy
http://kalamazoopride.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another Radical Idea Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Another Radical Idea Posted by: sambo4
Break up the oligopolies
Posted by: Paul82346 on Oct 13, 2005 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do believe we also need to pledge to repeal the Clinton Telecom bill. We should withdraw most favored trading status from China until they achieve environmental and labor parity with the USA. We must withdraw from Nafta & Cafta.
The environment and public health must again take priority over record profits and the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the upper 0.1 of 1% of the US population.
Do you believe that drug prices are at all associated with fair prices, how about gasoline prices? Record prices and record profits in both cases prove the point. We need to get involved in some good old fashioned Trust BUSTING. No company should be more powerful then the "we the people USA government" !!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Break up the oligopolies Posted by: Lincoln fan
Suzi W
Posted by: Suzi W on Oct 13, 2005 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with Drone but wish to add how seriously lacking in genuine leadership the Dem party is. I left them for Independent status (whatever that means) several elections ago. They remind me of an old prof's comments when annoyed with a student's reply " I think so, too! I have nothing further to add". They scuttled their own ship through the years. Yelling and screaming at this point over the booty at the bottom of the sea is ludicrous - if it weren't so frightening!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OTHER VITAL ISSUES THE DEMS NEED TO ADDRESS
Posted by: jeanmo on Oct 13, 2005 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your comments have been great, but you have forgotten a few very important points about how people get elected in this country -
- The election process itself is corrupted. There have been many allegations of election fraud in many places from Ohio to North Carolina to Florida and on and on - something needs to be done to make elections fair - a good start would be to have someone non-partisan running election boards, new voting machines with paper trails, ensure that there are enouch machines for everyon who wants to vote. It is unlikely that anyone other than a Republican will get elected unless we can ensure fairness for all.

- Our national debt - we are borrowing an astonishing rate from the Japanese and Chinese. These people will want to be repaid - So much attention is being paid to supreme court nominee's view on abortion and school prayer - but what about protecting our natural resources - which are being sent oversees to (you got it the Chinese and Japanese) - the courts will decide on issues related to environmental protection, workers rights, taxation, etc - we need candidates who will stand up for what is right for America.

- Poverty - has increased significantly since Bush and co took over. We need candidates who will look for real solutions to poverty - such as fully funding education and head start programs, to give kids a better shot at escaping poverty.

- Immigration - our borders are so porous it is criminal - there has been no real action to improve border control or to deal with illegal immigration - corporations are enjoying the reduced labor costs and significant costs to the rest of us. Immigration needs attention.

I could go on, but would appreciate feedback so far.
Jeanie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

meet the new boss, same as the old boss
Posted by: head on Oct 13, 2005 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please wake up. There can be no change with a two party political system. It is simply the illusion of democracy with each party of opposition dangling a carrot stick of false hopes to the voters. It is a world of nepotism and vile subservience to big business. Staying the present course is political masochism with the poor and middle class bearing the scars of the fetish. For God's sake, try something new.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

10 Pledges
Posted by: hoscot on Oct 13, 2005 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is the money going to come from? Clear the National debt first. Restore the middle class by making the first $30,000 tax free, caping individual earnings at $5 million and putting 100% import duties on imports from American companies who moved abroad or are farming out their production overseas.

Lets put America first. It's time to shrink our global military footprint, cut back hard on the military, and increase our peaceful diplomatic efforts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

strategy vs. philosophy
Posted by: dissidentpoet on Oct 13, 2005 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i do not believ that electing a "better Democrat" will actually change much. i don't think that there is much difference at all, and as has been posted earlier, i don't think there ever has been much difference between dems/repubs, especially for a Black person such as myself. so, long term, no, we should not settle for just helping the dems win now. and, again, long term, 3rd, 4th, and 5th parties sound like great ideas.

however, in the short term, we can make things at least a little better. does anyone think that gore/kerry would have appointed brown or someone as bad to head FEMA? yeah, i think that kerry wouldn't be much different in iraq, but he wouldn't appoint roberts/miers to the supreme court. would things be amazingly wonderfully better? only somone who is not really studying the dems would think so.

but a number of people would still be alive, and a few of our rights would be safe. is that enough? HELL F$#%ING NO!

but it is better than where we are, and a dem, who is electable unlike a 3rd party candidate, will be better than whoever the repubs put up. we can't let it rest at that, and we have to push the dems as hard as we push the repubs. the left sat on the sidelines, standing only to yell for clinton, not at him, and he did some evil, evil things (NAFTA, GATT, welfare bill, terrorism bill, etc.).

get the best in that we can, THEN SCREAM AND YELL AT HER/HIM TO GET WHAT WE WANT. and keep organizing.

dissidentpoet

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: strategy vs. philosophy Posted by: Lincoln fan
Ok,,now what to do about it?
Posted by: John Rice on Oct 13, 2005 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those who never made it to RE: not strong enough (above) what you all seem to be looking for is already in formation and needing your guiding help.

The Neither Party at www.neitherparty.org can succeed only with your input, and is in the process of evolving through the process of 'real' intelligent design--YOU. The idea is to "transcend politics" by forcing the choice of politicians to either agree to act in faith with a (now evolving) set of NP party principles, or face a NP-supported opponent who would.
This, in and of itself, unites most of the disillusioned, disunited and divided into one galvanized unit. All at the suggested and easily-affordable-to-most pledge of "a dime-a-day-for-Democracy" or $36.50 per year. One can 'join' for free, simply by registering and participating in its' evolution and then, hopefully, helping to spread the word.
A spreading, non-nuclear reaction could conceivably cover the entire nation three times over in a month--it is possible to unite and rather than defeat, coerce into doing what their citizen-rulers--all of us--demand.
Or, not.
Our future, your choice.
Regards,,John

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They conveniently left out cracking way down on Bigotry...
Posted by: gs15 on Oct 13, 2005 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...when if anything, that should arguably be NUMERO UNO on the list (left and right alike!). ZERO tolerance on racism, racial profiling, ethnic cleansing, homophobia, religious discrimination (including against athiests and agnostics) is a whole bunch of musts if anyone remotely claiming to be for the people---democrat, green, or whatever---desires to truly bring a whole bunch of peoples (who and whose interests seem to have been conspicuously absent from this discussion) into the mix.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» good point Posted by: dissidentpoet
There is an alternative to the Democrats....
Posted by: RevRick on Oct 13, 2005 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The answer in simply the reintroduction of "Fusion Voting".
A century ago Fusion Voting existed in every state, now it only exists in New York.

Clicking the link above will give you detailed information but in brief Fusion Voting allows more than one party to endorse the same candidate. The end result is it allows true coalitions to form.

For example its been decades since a Republican has won a statewide office in New York without the backing of the Conservative Party. When our current governor George Pataki ran against the incumbent Democrat Mario Cuomo, Pataki lost if you only counted the Republican votes and the Democrat votes as would be done in every other state.

However in New York the Conservative Party cross-indorsed Pataki so on the ballots Pataki had his name in two places, and when the Conservative votes were added to the Republican votes Pataki won. Now the Governor knew he would have to mess up pretty bad to loose the Republican backing in the next race, but the Conservative Party has been know to not back people if they don’t live up to their promises. So the Governor spent his term catering to the Conservatives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is an alternative (cont)
Posted by: RevRick on Oct 13, 2005 1:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So six years ago the Working Families Party (www.workingfamliesparty.org) formed and we set out to make the Democrats rely on our endorsement just like the Republicans rely on the Conservative endorsement.

The great thing is we have had a number of successes already. For example in one city we endorsed a candidate because she said she would support a living wage law, however when the time came to vote on the law she voted against it. So the next election the WFP ran a spoiler candidate against her just so she would loose and she did.

Another victory we have had is in reforming New York’s Draconian Rockefeller drug laws. Before the WFP got involved every time the issue was raised all of the County DAs would come to Albany and speak out against reform, so nothing was done. Well the WFP decided we were going to run a candidate for DA in a county on this issue. We looked for a suitable combination of a County we could win and a Candidate who could win. We decided on Albany County and David Soares. You can read about that victory here in The Nation.

The end result is next time the reforms were introduced not only did we have one DA on our side, a lot of the DAs who opposed the change in the past didn’t show up to speak out again because they were afraid we would aim for their position next, and changes were finally made.

Long story short third parties can become a viable part of our democracy again, and the WFP is working towards that end.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ToBeFrank
Posted by: ToBeFrank on Oct 13, 2005 4:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This 'Contract' is weak and lame, as the vast majority of comments indicate with depth, breadth and passion. I say the cancer, alas probably terminal, is the Democratic Leadership Council. As a 59 year old who once believed that elected government's essential responsibility is serving THE PEOPLE, I ask my fellow citizens if the Democratic Party ever did or can again represent that?

We can easily outvote Republicans 2-to-1 or better, if government produces results for the body politik. THE PEOPLE have been sold out and have understandably tuned out. Purging the DLC that brought us Bill Clinton is step one. Moving toward the middle is an empty political stance. Corporatism and elitism are anti-American values. Decades ago we recognized that as a nation we possessed the human and economic resources to realize the American Dream for all. We rejected 'Amerika' We see where 'America, Inc.' has dumped us today.

A fight for the dying heart of the Democratic, People's Party starts with shinging the truth beacon simultaneously on DLC-ers and Republicans. They are essentially the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Friendly Ammendment
Posted by: redragon52 on Oct 13, 2005 8:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like the idea of your list immensely. I do, however, object to your energy proposal to this extent: I don't think a "Manhattan Project" level of investment in energy is what we require. I think the nation should be mobilized, as Richard Heinberg suggests, as it was during WWII. Our energy predicament can only be ignored at our immense and looming peril. I also think you have to scrub hydrogen from your list of alternatives to pursue. It just fails to hold up to any serious scrutiny. The "Hydrogen Economy" is a politicians fantasy non-solution. One final suggestion. I'd add "permaculture development" to the list. Our fellow citizens will survive better if they are able to grow their own food locally. While it might seem outlandish now to suggest this, given how long it takes to acquire the necessary competence, I think training in local food production will come to be appreciated as a major vital interest for most in the not too distant future. It surely wouldn't hurt Democrats to back completely developed and appropriately focused programs.

Finally, let me applaud your article and your approach. Regardless of your consideration of my remarks above, I think your proposal is inspired.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Minimum Wage/Maximum Wage= diversion
Posted by: take pills on Oct 13, 2005 9:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about ending wage slavery all together and starting to respect people as actual individuals and not just what we assume their value is. So not a living wage but all people paid just for living. That would do alot to end the lazyness and apathy that we see today and allow everyone to truly blossom. It would happen when we all stop believing in/blaming these "other" people for all our problems. It's obvious what the affects of wage slavery has done to us. Democrats/ Republicans/ Green/ .... What a joke... How much more can we take? It's not really to stop working but to actualy start.

wageslave.org

And about "killing" the terrorists? Ummm, would that mean that we should all kill ourselves now? What was that about international law? Is that some george bush senior new world order agenda?? looks like more diversion to me.

I Like the post about more more I.D. ..Goes perfect with how revelations and more "mark of the beast" programming. Yeah do what your told and you'll be fine, uh huh sure.. Prisons have total survellience, are they any safer, or are people actually more violent when you treat them like animals?

At least this 10 demands thing is off to a seemingly good start! I like the comments, but look at what all "candidates" promise every day. It's just not going to happen, or if it does, it will only support the chosen few royal bloodline types and their close partners in crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When did the environment cease to be on the Progressive radar?
Posted by: sashamom on Oct 13, 2005 9:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I read the 10 pledges to be demanded of Democrats, not one word pertaining to all of the roll-backs that have been made on clean air and water, relaxation of rules protecting forests and national land..... and on and on.

To be fair, there was a mention of finding energy sources that are non-polluting, but what about cleaning up what's going on now. As one example, forcing the auto industry to make cars aimed at higher miles per gallon, not more horsepower.

I agree with the importance of all 10 points of the pledge. But if as citizens of the world and stewards of the earth we stand by and do nothing, our environment will be destroyed. The world's population will have larger problems feeding their poor and protecting the health of all on the planet.

If global warming is adding to the severity of hurricanes and disturbing weather patterns, then the natural disasters we have been seeing in recent years will only increase.

To protect the future of our planet and the planet of future generations we have to act now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The basic basics
Posted by: Edward George on Oct 14, 2005 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. The platform of the Democratic Party should be the Constitution. The CONSTITUTION, without any squirming or "interpreting".

2. The Democratic Party should declare that within the framework of the Constitution it accepts and agrees that the moral foundation of this country has been that of Christ's teachings in the New Testament. That among those teachings is clearly the principle of separation of church and state. Therefore the Democratic Party firmly and without exception supports that separation as a moral principle.

3. The Democratic Party should declare that within the framework of the Constitution it accepts that the fiscal success and power of this country stems largely from the relentless market place self interest of individuals, and the competition between them. And that any government action to interfere with or influence this competition in any way, other than outlawing specific acts or products for everybody and anybody, distorts it and endangers its effectiveness. Therefore the Democratic Party, as a matter of principle, consistently refuses to support any governmental favoritism in the market place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good List But Add Peace Action's New Foreign Policy Points
Posted by: rschutt on Oct 14, 2005 3:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have put together a good list that most Democrats should be able to endorse. It is not as progressive as the platform of the Green Party of course, but it covers the basics.

However, you should include three points from Peace Action's Campaign for a New Foreign Policy http://www.peace-action.org/camp/cnfp/threesteps.html :


1. Support Human Rights and Democracy
We should exhibit international leadership by opposing the policies of human rights abusers, not rewarding them with weapons.

Democracy and human rights are ideals that the American people hold dear. But sadly, our country leads the world in providing arms sales and military training to human rights abusing governments and dictatorships. When US weapons are used to prop up governments hated by their own people, bitterness is the result. When we sell weapons worldwide, those arms end up being used against our own troops.


2. Reduce the Threat from WMDs
Our nation should lead a worldwide campaign to reduce and control the threat from weapons of mass destruction.

We face no greater threat than nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction. Such weapons are only effective as a means of terror -- that can be aimed at us as well as others. The only way to be safe from this threat is to destroy the stockpiles and secure those facilities that make nuclear materials. Instead of leading efforts to secure and dismantle nuclear weapons, the Bush Administration wants to build new ones.


3. Cooperate with the World Community
We should play a positive, leadership role in the world community, planning strategies for a future we can all live with.

The Declaration of Independence urged "a decent respect for the opinions of mankind." Our foreign policy isn't reflecting that core value. Our elected officials have abandoned or blocked a host of international agreements on arms control, human rights, the environment, and the International Criminal Court. Instead of promoting "pre-emptive strikes," the US needs to promote policies that address the larger needs of the world community and that minimize the potential for hate and anger. This will increase our security.

-— Randy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AlanSmithee
Posted by: AlanSmithee on Oct 15, 2005 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Typical weakass bullshit from The Nation. "Oh pretty please mister democrat! Pretty please consider maybe possibly looking at one or two of the things on this list after we vote you into office. But only if you have the time!"

If this is the best the ABB appeasers can come up with, then screw it. It's way past time for a 3rd party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We are the party of FDR and the New Deal.
Posted by: Jack1849 on Oct 15, 2005 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The New Deal is the core of the modern Democratic Party and embodies our view of government and our values. It created the middle class, which was the engine of 50 years of American prosperity, and its accomplishments are generally supported by everyone. The Republican Party should be challenged to explain their opposition to it.

We should let people know that every time they drive on Lake Shore Drive in Chicago, or the Triborough Bridge in Manhattan, every time they fly out of LaGuardia Airport in New York City, every time they ride the Huntington Avenue Subway in Boston, or visit the San Antonio Zoo that they are benefiting from a New Deal program (WPA and PWA projects).

New Deal programs taught basic literacy and erected telephone poles, preserved endangered species, built truck trails and ranger stations, improved parks and beaches, planted trees, and fought fires. Over 1 million miles of roads, 40,000 schools, 3,500 parks, playgrounds and athletic fields, and 1,000 small airports, 124,031 bridges, 2,500 hospitals, 125,110 public buildings, 8,192 parks, over 3,000 schools, and 853 airport landing fields were constructed or improved. Direct relief was provided to the destitute to ensure that no one would starve.

Our platform should be built around what has been called Roosevelt’s Second Bill of Rights. In the State of the Union Address, January 11, 1944 FDR proposed that:

Every American is Entitled to;
∙The right to a useful and remunerative job;
∙The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
∙The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return that will give him and his family a decent living;
∙The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
∙The right of every family to a decent home;
∙The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
∙The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
∙The right to a good education.

“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if... private power …becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism. “ - FDR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meaningless Pledge: Dem. Party on Life Support
Posted by: CatDad on Oct 17, 2005 5:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Dems. blew it for me...the final straw was the heartless Bankruptcy Reform Bill. This was their one big chance to make amends for the Chernobyl they released on working-class Americans in the early 90s with NAFTA, GATT and most-favored trading status to China...all passed under a Democratic controlled Presidency and Congress. It is impossible to overestimate the damage that this has done...and it’s damage that keeps getting worse, not better, over time. If there was ever a time for total Democratic opposition to block a viciously callous bill...yet, 15 Dems broke rank and allowed it to pass. You blew it guys. Together with the DLC Democrats in the 1990s, you sold your soul to the devil and corporate America, and now you must live with the consequences.

Now, we have no credibility with working Americans. The only people speaking to this segment of the population now are the Republicans...it’s a message of resentment and of victimizing the victims...wrapped up in a glossy package of mega-church feel-good psychology.

I’m tired of all the Joe Bidens of our party who criticize the Iraq War yet whose solution is to send in more troops. I’m tired of Dems not stopping CAFTA or the Bankruptcy Reform Bill...even when it was within their power to do so. I think I’ll print out the “Ten Pledges Sheet” so I can line my cat’s litter box with it...that’s about the only use we’ll get out of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 -