Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Editorial: Wal-Mart Can Hide, But It Can't Run

By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted October 10, 2005.


Robert Greenwald's upcoming documentary about Wal-Mart's predatory practices is part of an unprecedented progressive media campaign.
Advertisement

Wal-Mart has taken advantage of the tragedy of Hurricane Katrina to try to distract the public from the myriad controversies that have plagued it recently. The extent of Wal-Mart's sins includes lawsuits about discrimination, union busting, worker anger over backlogs of unpaid overtime, and health care and compensation policies that send many of its employees to welfare and food stamps.

It's true that Wal-Mart stepped up to the plate to help the hundreds of thousands of victims of Katrina; the Walton family has reportedly contributed $25 million to the cause. But with everyone in the immediate family right at the top of Forbes' 500, it's not the biggest stretch to their wallets. In fact, a recent report from the National Center for Responsive Philanthropy faults the family with the largest personal fortune in the world for a "rather low level of philanthropic giving," and judges the purpose of their giving to be "primarily self-interested."

Wal-Mart reportedly spends $4 million a day on public relations to obscure its corporate irresponsibility and position it as an American company that truly cares. But even $4 million a day can't hide the vicious business model of the largest corporation on the planet. With 1.4 million employees (larger than GM, Ford, GE and IBM combined), Wal-Mart's $258 billion in annual revenues make up 2 percent of the U.S. G.D.P.

In spite of its financial largesse, or maybe because of it, Wal-Mart constantly plays the miser. A congressional report in 2004 found that a typical 200-employee Wal-Mart store cost federal taxpayers $420,000 for children's health care, tax credits and deductions for low-income families. That equals about $2,103 per Wal-Mart employee, or an annual welfare bill of $2.5 billion for Wal-Mart's 1.2 million employees in America. What that boils down to is that Americans subsidize Wal-Mart so that its stockholders can continue to reap huge profits.

Wal-Mart is about to find itself in the spotlight again. Robert Greenwald's new documentary film, Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price, rolls out in November, with thousands of house parties, and an array of journalistic reports in the progressive media. (Full disclosure: Robert Greenwald is a member of the board of trustees of the Independent Media Institute, AlterNet's parent organization.) In concert with this media effort, SEIU and hundreds of community and religious groups have organized a "Wal-Mart Week" to expose the truths about the company to the greater public.

Greenwald's film is pioneering an amazing model of film distribution, with supporters already signed up for 3,300 house parties around the globe. The method allows for a mass audience without waiting to see if the corporate movie theater chains will show it, and it also allows the documentary to go from production to distribution in a matter of weeks.

With this editorial, AlterNet is also upping the ante on Wal-Mart. We've published dozens of articles about Wal-Mart over the last few years. Now we have created a Wal-Mart page (www.alternet.org/walmart) that aggregates articles and investigative work by our writers and partner publications and websites; key information about the issues; and links to important campaigns.

In an unprecedented level of teamwork, The Nation, The American Prospect, In These Times, The Washington Monthly and other media will all be publishing investigative articles simultaneously during the week of November 7 in support of Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price.

The concerted effort of Greenwald's documentary, progressive media, activist campaigns like Wal-Mart Watch, community groups and the SEIU is great. But the truth is, Wal-Mart won't be forced to change unless everyone pitches in. And it's easy for you to get involved.

Join the many thousands across America in the largest campaign ever against Wal-Mart's corporate practices:


Digg!

Don Hazen is the executive editor of AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Canadians are duped by Wal-Mart too!
Posted by: neilemac on Oct 10, 2005 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Canada is a victim of the greedy conglomerate economic boondoggle too and I would appreciate it if you would extend an invitation to all of North America (and all countries Wal-Mart victimizes) when calling upon participation in your awareness campaign to expose Wal-Mart's despicable corporate greed and wanton employment policies.
namasté

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Canadians are... Posted by: American Maid
Fair-handed discussion
Posted by: Ben Furman on Oct 10, 2005 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An excellent article by Charles Fishman discussing Wal-Mart's corporate model and its (perhaps) unintended consequences was printed nearly two years ago - in the December '03 isssue of Fast Company. The archived article is available now at the following URL:

http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/77/walmart.html

This is a fair-handed analysis of the company's practices from a businessperson's perspective. It avoids hyperbole but gets the message across clearly and gives us a glimpse inside Wal-Mart's way of thinking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets not forget..
Posted by: Rolomax on Oct 10, 2005 8:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let us not forget that the poor are generally ignorant, and that most employees probably don't know how to take advantage of all of this federal assistance.

It is likely true that Wal-mart employees talk amongst themselves and this info gets passed along somewhat, but what about the tens of thousands of other low-wage employers?

It seems to me that if wal-mart needs to take a hit, then the best way to do it would be to educate the gigantic number of people working minimum wage jobs. Let 'em know that they can get federal assistance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lets not overstate Posted by: peritonlogon
» RE: Lets not forget... Posted by: Rolomax
Shameful
Posted by: Newsguy on Oct 10, 2005 9:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is absolutely shameful that this mega-giant corporation is subsidized by us taxpayers. Corporate welfare should be outlawed. The Dems should make a huge issue of it. I think there would be a groundswell of support for Democrats if they were to point out how our tax dollars are supporting multi-billion dollar corporations. It is outrageous on a visceral level.
http://kalamazoopride.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shameful Posted by: Basenjis
Things I don't understand
Posted by: peritonlogon on Oct 10, 2005 10:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must admit that from time to time I do patronize Walmart. I almost always feel disappointed in myself for doing it and usually vow never to return. (I think the main reason I do is that I've recently moved and they offer a number of products that would really have to search for.) Most of their practices I disagree with but can accept and some I really can't accept. That being said, the main reason I feel so disappointed in myself is that after having to make a few minor and a few not so minor moral sacrafices to go in the store, no one is enjoying themselves. The stores look unhealthy, just about all of the employees look like they're having the worst day of their lives and to top it off I have to wait in a 25 minute line to buy one poorly made thing, which means that all of their customers leave the store in a worse mood than when they entered.

I thought branding and the corporate images that take over our modern lives by allowing us to find our identity and define ourselves through the patronizing of the logo (this being their idea) was supposed to work by trying to make us, the consumers, feel better about ourselves through their corporate logo, not make me and everyone else who has ever patronized the store feel dull, anoyed and generally like a sucker. This is what I truly don't understand about Walmart and it's success.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Things I don't understand Posted by: peritonlogon
» RE: Things I don't understand Posted by: Basenjis
Barbara
Posted by: Barbara on Oct 11, 2005 4:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It really gets back to the community, doesn't it. If people start objecting to WalMart's practices, then it's time to order things by mail, car pool, etc, so you can stop shopping there. When WalMart moves into an area, just don't shop there.
What people just don't seem to get is that they really do have allot of power, when they act as a community. People know the effects of WalMart on a community. Heck,...I don't even live in your country, and already I wouldn't shop there. I'm not a future customer of theirs, even if they came to my country. When people start looking at the long term costs of where they spend their dollar, corporations will alter their behaviour. But, not until then. With every dollar that people spend, they are actually supporting that company . It's a choice you need to make, otherwise, don't bitch about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Easy to say...
Posted by: digitalzen on Oct 11, 2005 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's easy to say that people just shouldn't shop at Wal-Mart. It's hard, however, to convince the millions of people who do that they should spend more of their limited income in order to teach a lesson to the people who give them low prices.

People will look after their own interests first, then - if they are able - they'll start looking after the other guy. That's not judgemental, it's just the way things are.

What alternatives are you suggesting for the folks who find Wally World a help in making ends meet?

(And no, I don't shop at Wal-Mart; but I can afford the gesture.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: asy to say... Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: asy to say... Posted by: annadams95340
» yea its easy to say Posted by: 2rivers
About that $4M a day for PR.....
Posted by: churchofone on Oct 11, 2005 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they have 1.2 million employees and instead spent that money on employee BENEFITS, it would equal $3.33 per day, or $100 per month. I'm pretty sure that would be a BIG HELP to those who need health insurance, particularly if Wally World self-insures (and I'd lay money that they do!).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Phillip
Posted by: pco on Oct 11, 2005 6:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Walmart described on this web site is not the Walmart I know. A Super Walmart just opened in my community and it is a craze. People come from 30 miles away and it is always packed. The unemployment rate has significantly dropped in my town because so many people have been hired. Maybe Walmart doesn't pay the best salary, but a lot of people are no longer unemployed. I know the store manager. He has been loosing his eyesight and is now legally blind. Did Walmart fire him or demote him? NO. He does a great job and is a hit among all the employees. The people I know who work at there don't consider it the greatest job, but they are grateful for it.

There will always be complainers. I worked constrution for 7 years working long hours and getting paid minumum wage and I had no health insurance or benefits. Noboday forced me to work there, just as nobody is forced to work at walmart. We live in a free society. If you don't like working at walmart, get another job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Phillip Posted by: sidewinder
» Your New Super Walmart Posted by: Tara Downer
» RE: Your New Super Walmart Posted by: pwestre
» RE: Pco is truly blind Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: Phillip Posted by: pwestre
Left and right hypocrites
Posted by: robbi on Oct 12, 2005 11:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can the Democrats expose WalMart for what it is?

After all, the Clintons were good friends of the late Mr. Sam Walton, founder of the enterprise and native of Arkansas.

Hypocrites on the right and on the left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sam Walton vs. the Walton Clan Posted by: Tara Downer
» RE: Sam Walton Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: Left and right hypocrites Posted by: mohobbit
publisher
Posted by: hopedance on Oct 12, 2005 2:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi.

Its not just having houseparties (with the Wal-Mart film) but large gatherings at movie theaters, church basements, libraries, outdoors... theres an incredible surge of showing films in local communities because of the revolutionary technology of the video projector. see my ebook (BECOMING THE MEDIA; SHOWING FILMS IN YOUR LOCAL COMMUNITY) at http://www.hopedance.org/new/showing_films.html.

thanks

bob banner
publisher of www.hopedance.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WalMart is Efficient, So is E-Bay, Socialism is not
Posted by: Chocomlk on Oct 12, 2005 10:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only difference between WalMart and E-Bay is that E-Bay has virtual cash registers, run with few employees. WalMart is beginning to use more and more self service registers. At that point they may be able to cut at least 12% of the employees from their payroll permenantly. After people get done chasing the wrong mouse in this equation, they may wake up to wish they had left well enough alone. I am not a WalMart fan although I have inspected their premises and studied their business operation. The reason they are sucessful is because they fill a need. It's that simple. Socialistic causes are inefficient because the public does not need them to the level they would if not for WalMarts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

F.T.Dove
Posted by: Oceola on Oct 14, 2005 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regarding Wall-Mart, Am I the only person in the United States that has never bought anything at that horrible Wall-Mart?? Or, Sams Club? My conscience will not allow me to shop at a store that depends on slave labor to produce their products. Wall-Mart should be shut down, the sooner the better!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: F.T.Dove Posted by: Lani
» AGREE 10000% Oceola Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: F.T.Dove Posted by: BlueTigress
The United States of America: 1776-1980
Posted by: SFRosalyne on Oct 16, 2005 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My country is dead. I am still an American citizen, but the nation I swore allegiance and fealty to is dead, murdered by cowardly corporations and DemoPublican thieves and the dumbed-down chickenshits who cared more about their filthy money than their nation's fellow citizens at the ballot box. My America does not have the words 'incorporated' or 'corporation' in the name. It is United States of America, not PigBiz Inc. or such.

I will die knowing I had the honor not to trade with this traitorus corporation and many others like it, and if I ever became President, all American business will either honor the Constitution or their executives, stockholders and investors imprisoned for life without parole (or money) like any other traitor or spy gang who betrays this country.

At least foreign spies can claim patriotism - NO American corporation can make that claim as long as it contributes to Democrats or Republicans - or incorporates or remains incorporated for the purpose of evading taxes the common citizen cannot evade.

Neither of these groups of people truly have America's interests at heart - if the did, they would proudly pay their fair share of taxes and have their wealthy contributors imprisoned or shot for trying to evade their citizenly obligation to pay their share of the bills owed to the country that protects their freedom and business from foreign enemies (Trust me you pinstriped whores of the boardrooms, you don't want to know what their idea of a 'hostile takeover' really is). Furthermore, they should be stripped of all wealth other than basic survival sustenance for their attempted subversion of the rule of law for the People and by the People!

Thank Goddess I am a Green Party member.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have an idea !!!
Posted by: nitsua1023 on Oct 16, 2005 5:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somebody should get some cheap, bulk DVDs of this film, and stand outside of Wal-Mart (away from the entrance, cuz they'll kick you out) and intercept people on the way back to their cars. Just hand out the DVDs and ask people to watch it once or twice and pass it along. (Take two and pass rule) Spread the information. Some of you shop there and feel guilty. Maybe we could help more people to AT LEAST feel guilty when they shop there, and to start thinking about their choices. It's harder to be willfully ignorant than to just be ignorant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Call to action. Stop the Republican Party.
Posted by: maximus on Oct 21, 2005 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call to action. Stop the Republican Party.

http://tinyurl.com/8ghl8

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]