comments_image -

Bush's D'oh! Factor

This President begins every new project with the boyish enthusiasm of Homer Simpson. Take his scheme to let corporations repatriate their profits, for instance.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

I have a slogan for the Bush administration: "D'oh!"

This President begins every new project, be it foreign or domestic, with the boyish enthusiasm of Homer Simpson. Just let his pals down at Moe's plant the seed of a half-baked notion in his head and George takes it from there.

Enthusiasm is a good thing when exercised by the rational and competent. But when exercised by a dimwit, all that passion and energy can only end with a resounding, "d'oh!"

And so it has come to pass with another of George's economic brainstorms. It all began after a few beers. The fellas at Moe's were discussing how high US corporate tax rates were forcing corporations to hide more and more of their profits overseas. Lenny suggested that maybe we could get that money repatriated if we gave those companies a freebee, let them bring the money back into their own country for practically nothing.

George, sipping his sarsaparilla, bolted upright. "Yeah, great idea. Could create jobs. Would create jobs. Those companies would use that money to create jobs. Billions of jobs."

So, along with his other tax breaks, George added a measure that would allow companies that had hidden profits offshore to repatriate them without paying the full tax, normally around 25%. Instead they would just pay postage and handling, 5.25%.

And it worked. Hell, how could it not work? Five and a quarter percent was even less than the tax havens were charging companies to shuffle all those peas around under shell company accounts. But to get that deal companies had to get all that dough back into the US before the end of this year.

And, as I said, it worked. After all, wouldn't you agree too if it meant being in the 5% tax bracket?

We learned that companies had salted away about $350 billion offshore. At least, that's how much they've admitted to so far. Had those companies paid their fair share of taxes in the first place the US Treasury would be about $90 billion better off than it is now. Instead they were rewarded for their creative tax avoidance by being given a free pass.

Never mind that, George said. The jobs all that repatriated money would create here at home would more than make up for that little favor.

So, how did that idea pan out? Not so much.

According to that left-wing rag, the Wall Street Journal, most of that money is being used by companies to buy back stock in their own companies and pay off old loans and boost executive compensation. But that's not what they were supposed to do with the money.

"Companies aren't supposed to use repatriated funds for stock buybacks, dividends, or executive compensation, but there is no requirement that companies isolate funds or show that spending on approved uses is above what the company would have spent normally." (Oct 5 WSJ)
And what of those jobs? Well, one of the companies that dug up its offshore stash was Colgate-Palmolive Co. which hauled home $800 million, for which the company said, "Thank you very much" -- and then proceeded with plans to shut a third of its US factories and eliminate 4,450 jobs.

More Doh! Dough

And how is George's brainstorm going? (That, if we let the rich keep more of their money by giving them fat tax breaks, they will use it to create jobs).

New York Times -- Oct 5: After falling for two years, the share of income going to the richest slice of Americans - the top tenth of 1 percent - grew significantly in 2003 while the share going to 99 percent of Americans fell, tax data released yesterday showed....At the same time, the effective income tax rates paid by the top tenth of 1 percent fell sharply, declining at more than 10 times the rate reduction for middle-class taxpayers, the new report, by the Internal Revenue Service, showed.
Only for those Americans in the top 1 percent, the nearly 1.3 million taxpayers who made at least $327,000, did incomes increase significantly more in 2003 than the rate of inflation....The top 1 percent of taxpayers received almost 17.5 percent of all income and paid a third of all income taxes in 2003, the I.R.S. found. The top tenth of 1 percent received 7.57 percent of reported income and paid more than 15.3 percent of all income taxes.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Republican NLRB Member Accused of Leaks to Romney Campaign Resigns

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos Labor

 
 
Record 45% of Iraq and Afghanistan Vets Have Filed for Disability

By Muriel Kane | Raw Story

 
 
President Obama's Memorial Day Address: "Honoring Those Who Made the Ultimate Sacrifice"

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
"Tubes": What the Internet is Made Of

By Laura Miller | Salon

 
 
Students at Stuyvesant Take Issue With Sexist Dress Code

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Chris Hayes on Memorial Day: Glamorizing and Justifying War with the Term "Hero"

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Cory Booker vs. Philly Mayor Michael Nutter on Mitt Romney

By BooMan | Booman Tribune

 
 
How Florida Governor Rick Scott Could Steal The Election For Mitt Romney

By Judd Legum | ThinkProgress

 
 
Renowned Economist Simon Johnson Calls for a National Safety Board for Finance Ticking Time Bomb

By Lynn Parramore | AlterNet

 
 
Veterans' Gap

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]