Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Excerpt: A Left-Hook to Racism

By Dave Zirin, AlterNet. Posted October 7, 2005.


Boxers like Jack Johnson and Joe Louis used the only unsegregated sport at the turn of the century to smash pseudo-scientific beliefs about race and athleticism.
Joe Louis -- Excerpt: A Left-Hook to Racism
Joe Louis in 1935. (Bettmann)

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Dave Zirin

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

This is an excerpt from Dave Zirin's new book, What's My Name, Fool?: Sports and Resistance in the United States (Haymarket Books, 2005).

No sport has chewed athletes up and spit them out -- especially black athletes -- quite like boxing. For the very few who "make it," it is never the sport of choice. Boxing has always been for the poor, for people born at the absolute margins of society. The first boxers in the United States were slaves. Southern plantation owners amused themselves by putting together the strongest slaves and having them fight it out while wearing iron collars.

After the abolition of slavery, boxing was unique among sports because it was desegregated as early as the turn of the last century. This was not because the people who ran boxing were in any way progressive. They make the people who run boxing today resemble gentlemen of great character. Those early promoters simply wanted to make a buck off the rampant racism in American society by pitting black vs. white for public spectacle. Unwittingly, these early fight financiers opened up a space in which the white supremacist ideas of the day could be challenged. This was the era of deeply racist pseudo-science. The attitude of the social Darwinist quacks was that blacks were not only mentally inferior but also physically inferior to whites. Blacks were cast as too lazy and too undisciplined to ever be taken seriously as athletes.

When Jack Johnson became the first black heavyweight-boxing champion in 1908, his victory created a serious crisis for these ideas. The media whipped up in a frenzy about the need for a "Great White Hope" to restore order to the world. Former champion Jim Jeffries came out of retirement to restore that order, saying, "I am going into this fight for the sole purpose of proving that a white man is better than a Negro."

At the fight, which took place in 1910, the ringside band played, "All Coons Look Alike to Me," and promoters led the nearly all-white crowd in the chant "Kill the nigger." But Johnson was faster, stronger, and smarter than Jeffries, knocking him out with ease. After Johnson's victory, there were race riots around the country -- in Illinois, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Texas, and Washington, D.C. Most of the riots consisted of white lynch mobs attempting to enter black neighborhoods and blacks fighting back.

This reaction to a boxing match was the most widespread simultaneous racial uprising in the U.S. until the riots that followed the 1968 assassination of civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Right-wing religious groups immediately organized a movement to ban boxing, and Congress actually passed a law that prohibited the showing of boxing films. Black leaders, such as Booker T. Washington, pushed Johnson to condemn the African-American uprising. But Johnson remained defiant. He not only spoke out on all issues of the day, he also broke racist social taboos by marrying white women, and as a result faced harassment and persecution for most of his life. Johnson was forced into exile in 1913 on the trumped-up charge of transporting a white woman across state lines for prostitution.


Digg!

Read more of Dave Zirin's writing at Edgeofsports.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Jack Johnson story movie
Posted by: zooeyhall on Oct 7, 2005 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For readers who may not be aware of it, Jack Johnson's story was made into a 1971 move "The Great White Hope" with James Earl Jones in the title role. It is available on DVD.

As a footnote, Max Schmeling was anti-Nazi and was a friend of Louis until Louis' death, including helping to pay for his funeral and being a pall bearer. More on Schmeling can by found at www.wikipedia.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jack Johnson story movie Posted by: just thinkin
» RE: Jack Johnson story movie Posted by: liberalibrarian
» RE: Jack Johnson story movie Posted by: Richie the C
» RE: Jack Johnson story movie Posted by: Richie the C
Marriage is the Latest Forum for Racism in America
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Oct 7, 2005 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The gains of the Black community in America does not signify an end to the kind of discrimination which Blacks endured for so many centuries. The emotional inadequacy which found expression in hatred of blacks seems to have now focused on homosexuality.

In an attempt to appeal to his Christian Right and Neoconservative constituency Bush has give homophobia the presidential stamp of approval by calling for a constitutional amendment to ensure that only heterosexual couples can be legally married. According to Bush "The union of a man and a women is the most enduring human institution."

As in the debate on other importan issues, the President not only reveals his own homophobia but also his ignorance. The so-called "enduring human institution" is not only different in other cultures but has changed in our own culture.

In the 1950s, men and women married at an average age of about 23 whereas today, the average age is closer to 30. Many couples now decide not to marry at all but choose to live in a common-in-law relationship which in Canada, at least, is fully recognized and accepted by the courts and society. In the 1950s couples were expected to have children but today, many couples have opted for a childless marriage. Divorce was very rare in the 1950s and when it occured, there was a stigma attached to the woman. Today, over half of all marriages break up and single women do not suffer a stigma at all.

Where is the abiding, unchanging, rock-solid intstituion of marriage to which President Bush refers. His call for a constitutional amendment only adds fuel to the fire of discrimination of gays and lesbians. As with Blacks who were considered inferior, homosexuality is considered unnatural and abnormal. There are over 400 species of animals which have been known to have homosexual relations such as penguins, flamingos and African apes. The other important point to bear in mind is that the instituion of marriage is a social construct and not some universal unalterable institution handed down from some supreme being.

All this is beyond the reach of the President's intellect and so another group of people suffer at the hands of an ideological president whose context for any issue excludes history, sociology, philosophy, anthropology and biology. The Afghanis and Iraqis are a memorial to the limits of this president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dan Savage on Marriage Equality Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» excuse me Posted by: kittykat
jack johnson
Posted by: okie11 on Oct 7, 2005 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
also there is a good program on johnson on pbs. i can't recall the name of the program but find it at www.pbs.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jack johnson Posted by: KILA
thanks
Posted by: owleyes on Oct 7, 2005 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for a beautiful and chilling article. Joe Louis has always been a name I recognized, thinking, "wasn't he a boxer back in the 30s or something?" But now I want to find out everything about him.
There is a strange myth that racism is over. Conservatives sometimes say they think the civil rights movement (but not the Civil Rights Act) was necessary, and they are also thankful to the suffragettes. In the next breath, they will tell you they think that today's Black empowerment and feminist movements (such as they are) are simply divisive strategies designed by the evil masterminds at the DNC to exploit people's natural differences for political gain. But if that were true, we who were white kids in the 80s would have been told the truth about slavery, Joe Louis, Martin Luther King, the Detroit Riots, the Black Panthers and Rodney King when we were young. Instead, if by some mistake we actually read a book and found out the truth about some of these things, we were told that they were unfortunate stains on the character of an otherwise unimpeachable nation, but all that ugliness is safely in the past now so it no longer matters because this is America and everyone is equal. This is the line I was fed, because I am white. What I wonder is, what did they tell black kids?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: thanks Posted by: kittykat
The Sweet Science --
Posted by: AdamSelene11726 on Oct 7, 2005 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boxing is a strange sport .

Two men take a beating until one of them is beaten.

But the strangest thing of all is the racial passion the sport stirred up -- and you'd have thought that by the 1970s White People would have gotten over the idea that one man's superiority at fisticuffs was some indicator of who should clean whose bathrooms in this world ...

(I mean I can see cherishing the delusion that an African-American Ivy Leage college student lacks the inellectual capacity to play Quarterback Pro ball after he graduates. )

Yet there it is:

Remember Jerry Clooney ? (Just try googling him! )

But in 1982 he was the Great White Hope. The sports books were having trouble getting action on him at 10 and 15 to 1 ... but the night of the fight, there was no trouble getting barroom sucker bets at even money.

The moral of the story: don't make Class assumptions based on Race.

Clooney was hopelessly outclassed as a fighter, but the suckers bet on Race.

And if that doesn't explain how Nixon's Southern Strategy gave Reagan the White House ... I don't know what does.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It was Gerry Cooney and Posted by: WhatNow?
"Unforgiveable Blackness: The Rise And Fall Of Jack Johnson"
Posted by: Bbonnn on Oct 7, 2005 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think you're talking about the Ken Burns 2-hour documentary, "Unforgiveable Blackness." Definitely worth a rental, or catch it on your local PBS station if you can.

Like the book excerpted here, it's less about the sporting events themselves, and more about the athletes as public figures, and how they became representations of much larger battles of race and identity being fought in society. Listening to the writings of famous figures like Jack London, who pinned his hopes on Jeffries to save the "white race," jolted me into the reality of blackness and whiteness at the turn of the century, even in supposedly less racist areas like San Francisco and the Northeast.

http://www.pbs.org/unforgivableblackness/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It is a great documentary. Posted by: WhatNow?
Jack Johnson
Posted by: RHouston on Oct 7, 2005 2:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The most informative information that I've seen on John Arthur "Jack" Johnson was Robert DeCoy's And I believe the title was "Papa Jack, from a Man that Knew him."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another interesting tidbit
Posted by: WhatNow? on Oct 8, 2005 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Johnson volunteered to train Louis but he was rejected. Johnson predicted Louis would lose to Schmelling in the first fight which he did.

When watching the Burns' documentary I kept getting the impression that Johnson was not much appreciated by his own(black) people either, especially any that had any social standing. If he had gotten greater support from the more "affluent" blacks he may have had a better career and not turned to the bottle as much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Left Hook To racism irony
Posted by: Bill C on Oct 11, 2005 2:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ultimate irony about the Louis-Schmeling fights was that while hypocritical White racists in the U.S. were celebrating (vicariously through Joe Louis victory over Schmeling in '38) America's victory over Nazi Germany, they still made sure that Louis and other Blacks were kept down by any means possible. Also ironic was the fact that after the U.S. government broke Louis financially with back taxes, (despite the fact that Louis had fought at least twice for Army/Navy relief benifits) Max Schmeling, with whom Joe Louis was close friends, repeatedly gave Louis money under the table to help him. When Louis died in 1981, Schmeling paid for the funeral.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]