Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Coming Out Strong

By Jan Frel, AlterNet. Posted September 28, 2005.


In the wake of DeLay's indictment, David Dreier -- one of the three Republicans who moved up in the power chain -- will likely face greater scrutiny from GOP allies for his closeted sexuality.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jan Frel

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

It's being reported everywhere: "A Texas grand jury on Wednesday charged Rep. Tom DeLay and two political associates with conspiracy in a campaign finance scheme, forcing the House majority leader to temporarily relinquish his post." And with that, joy on the faces of thousands of activists and organization leaders who have poured millions of dollars into taking the House Majority Leader down. The face of Republican scandal may soon be framed in a mugshot resting on Texas prosecutor Ronnie Earle's desk.

And as DeLay retreats, who will "temporarily" replace him as Majority Leader of the House? It looks like a triumvirate will share DeLay's responsibilities: Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), and House Rules Committee Chair Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.), with Blunt holding DeLay's title, Cantor taking on the Whip role, and Dreier "taking a broader role in coordinating the work of other committees."

All three are your typical corrupt House Republicans. Dreier though, is a close ally of DeLay's (Blunt has had some scuffles with DeLay in the past), and he has been a stalwart defender of DeLay in his time of need: Dreier donated $5,000 to DeLay's legal defense fund, and in his capacity as Rules Committee Chair Dreier recently sent a letter to House members indicating that he plans to further obstruct the unweildy ethics complaint filing process.

But Dreier also represents another archetype of the dark side of the GOP: The closeted gay man. If ever there were an opportunity to expose the hypocrisy of the Grand Old Party on gay issues, it is now.

Dreier was outed by activist blogger Mike Rogers of BlogActive, and John Byrne of Raw Story. Long-time gay rights author Doug Ireland nailed the story down with an article in L.A. Weekly.

It is widely assumed that Dreier's partner is none other than his chief of staff, Brad Smith. Janice Nelson, Dreier's Democratic opponent in 1998 and 2000, was aware that Dreier and Smith were living together at the time, saying, "Brad was like an invisible presence. They really have the routine down slick." As Byrne of Raw Story discovered, Smith makes $156,000 a year -- only $400 less than Andrew Card, who runs George Bush's shop in the White House. It's also been reported that Dreier and Smith traveled to 25 countries together using taxpayer funds. Doug Ireland provided a corollary to this kind of arrangement: "New Jersey Democratic Governor Jim McGreevey was recently forced to resign when it was about to become public that he had put his boyfriend on the public payroll at a salary slightly less than the one which Dreier pays Smith."

Is it right to out a closeted gay politician? Doug Ireland follows the openly gay Democratic Congressman Barney Frank's (D-Mass.) rule: "Outing is only acceptable when a person uses their power or notoriety to hurt gay people."

And David Dreier's record fully qualifies him for public exposure. Ireland writes:

He opposed the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would have banned discrimination against gay people in hiring; voted for the gay-bashing Defense of Marriage Act; voted for banning adoption by gay and lesbian couples in the District of Columbia (3,000 miles away from Dreier's district); voted to allow federally funded charities to discriminate against gays in employment, even where local laws prohibit such bias; and voted against the Hate Crimes Prevention Act.

Informed of Hastert's recommendation, Doug Ireland told me, "Because the corporate media, with the exception of Frank Rich of the New York Times, have consistently refused to cover the outing of a rather significant number of Republican leaders, Dreier has been able to get away with the hypocrisy of being in the closet as a gay man, while continuing to vote against legal equality for gay people.

"If Dreier is elevated to Majority leader, it simply means that the Republican Party is comfortable with the hypocrisy of its closeted gay leadership."

When I asked BlogActive's Mike Rogers, a former development director for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and current editor of PageOneQ.com, he was effusive. "This is an exciting moment in American history," he said. "Having a gay man assuming responsibilties of the Majority Leader -- one who opposes the Federal Marriage Amendment, no less -- is a coup for the gay community as it all but nails shut the coffin of amending the constitution to same-sex civil marriage equality."

Just think, how can the party of Family Values explain to its only grassroots bulwark, the Christian Right, that it will punish the "homosexual agenda" when it has a gay man co-managing the third-most powerful organ of our federal system? We'll find out soon enough. As Rogers put it, "Thanks to Denny Hastert for looking beyond the extreme members of his party to elevate a gay man to help lead the House."

Digg!

Jan Frel is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Forgot to do their homework
Posted by: insanityprevails on Sep 28, 2005 2:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps a revolution will not be a necessity after all. Maybe the Republican Party has reached the point of no return by its own volition. By either sheer arrogance or by forgetting to do their homework, they may have ended their own reign. The fall of Representative DeLay could be the final push needed.

The fact that Congressman Dreier is gay is irrelevant. The fact that he has constantly voted to suppress gays is not. Thus the quandry that President Bush now finds himself in. If he wasn't drinking before, he likely will be now.

There are a very large number of gay Americans that are unhappy with those that choose to shield the fact that they are gay from public view, advance to power, then use that power against other gays. When one does, they are outted in one of several places, some of which are mentioned in this article. If one truly does research the Bush Administration, they would likely be shocked at the number of gays that are employed by President Bush and his underlings. This news is not new, it has in fact been out there for a long period of time. This puts President Bush in a most uncomfortable position with his base. How can they continue to support an administration that employs the very people that the same base chooses to discriminate against? An interesting dilemma, and one that I believe will push the recent hurricanes at least temporarily out of the headlines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Forgot to do their homework Posted by: Lincoln fan
Dreier's homosexuality no go for 'liberals' in DC?
Posted by: keffiya on Sep 28, 2005 3:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Garance Franke-Rute alluded to this on the American Prospect's Weblog, but did it in a very back-handed manner: "Dreier, a staunch conservative, will likely find himself drawing some unwanted attention in his new post, if selected, for reasons I'll leave it up to Wonkette to get into. I can't imagine the Christian right will particularly like having the House GOP led by him once that process starts up again, however."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you live in Sugar Land, anything that gets rid of Tom is great news
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Sep 28, 2005 4:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have hundreds of emails, which are DeLay's response to my concerns on various issues. All he ever sends is an automated responses. Some of us will be dancing in the streets with this indictment. It has been a long time coming and hopefully we can elect someone who will represent us in the next election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tom Delay shouldn't be the only Republican to go down in defeat.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 28, 2005 4:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More political conservatives, most of whom are Republican, deserve to be smashed and I hope to friggin god Ben Afflack doesn't run against George Allen as us Virginians want a Virginia native running as a Democrat for U.S. Senate to pulvarize George FUCKING Allen, not watch a outside Hollywood star to come in and go down in flames like what happened to Clooney in KY last year. And while we're at it, don't let the DLCers pick the challengers this time around as this country has had 25 years if not more of hell as a result. The more real Democrats there are, the less worries the party will have to face as tying themselves to bad corporate interests has only made them toothless even against Tom Delay. Folks, now is the time to get our political guns and progressive thinktanks and fight the real war against terrorism that has plagued America for at least 25 years by terminating neoconservative fascism and putting in the hurtlocker once and for all !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Waiting In the Wings Posted by: OldRedleg2
» You should run! Posted by: beetruetoyou
GO DOWN in flames Delay!!! Pun intended
Posted by: Michiganman on Sep 28, 2005 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank god maybe the old adage might actually come to pass; give em enough rope and they will hang themselves. Burn in hades Delay! And to think one of his replacement is a gay treasonous traitor(to his sexual orientation) only sweetens the deal. What say you now hard christian right? YAY! WoooHooo!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» AGREE 10000% Posted by: Michiganman
» Republicans are hypocrites Posted by: La Femme Nikita
Ok, everyone, let's put all the pressure we can on these corrupt politicians !
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 28, 2005 7:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tell DeLay and Frist to Resign Immediately by David Sirota

Plenty of links on his site to help you trash these MFs "one voting bullet at a time".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Outing is only acceptable when a person uses their power or notoriety to hurt gay people
Posted by: La Femme Nikita on Sep 28, 2005 8:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for this article! This issue first caught my eye on Lakshmi's blog.

A side note. A father at my daughter's school who after listening to me tell him about my experience with Kali, told me to "try Lakshmi". She is a Hindu Goddess, the Goddess of Love, I think. Did you all know that?

Ok back to the story. I followed around some links, posted this to my blog, and outed my statutory rapist! Thanks Alternet. This has been an empowering day with empowering articles to say the least.

Keep up the good work!

The Republican party is finally getting what's coming to it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Lakshmi Posted by: La Femme Nikita
Republicans the party of Queers??!!
Posted by: TVernon on Sep 28, 2005 11:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who would've thought - well, let's do it! I say let's ride that elephant all the way into Sunday morning services. Yahoo! I say this is fantastic news! A Queer as Majority Leader!!! YEAH!!! I'm doing old high school cheers right now, twirling my pigtails, and readjusting my (ahem) athletic cup to celebrate!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Do you really want to know Mr. Man? Posted by: La Femme Nikita
» Man vs. Women Is that your game? Posted by: Michiganman
» Enough said..... Posted by: Michiganman
» Integrity Posted by: La Femme Nikita
Futile action
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 29, 2005 3:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The millions that were spent to unseat Tom DeLay may or may not have achieved the goal; time will tell. But unfortunately there are three more of the same stepping up to take his place. This money would have been better spent to remove the cause of the corruption. If campaigns were totally financed by taxpayers, this type of scandal would disappear. As a bonus, elected officials would work for the voters rather than for campaign contributors. join the revolution

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Queer Majority Leader comment
Posted by: redfrog on Sep 29, 2005 4:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The tragedy is not that there might actually be a "queer Majority Leader" but that there would be one so closeted and self-loathing that he actually votes for laws supporting unequal treatment and rights for gays and lesbians with "hets."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Defrocking the Republican clergy Posted by: La Femme Nikita
Oh My!
Posted by: placid on Sep 29, 2005 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A persons sexuality, should simply be. In an administration that panders to Christian fundamentalism and an anti-gay agenda one has to wonder about all the gay connections in this administration.How this plays out later remains to be seen. Generally I applaud a gay brother or sister working under the term, ability to do the job, and not have their choice of who they may love be any factor at all. Yet, I feel betrayed that this is a hypocrite out for power and self serving,while all the while being against civil rights for my gay and lesbian brothers and sisters. To me, who got married only to have it annuled by the state supreme court of Oregon is a great blow, I see no difference than a person of color representing blocking civil rights for his or her own group. There is no joy in this person acquiring such a position. Why one turns his back on his own community??.... I guess what kissinger said and I will quote as closely as I can "there is no aphrodesiac as potent as power." Meanwhile ,this is consistent with this administration. much is done amidst smoke and fog.Misrepresentation,advocating something one is not, not caring for your own communities rights hence surely a willingness to not stop there.And in a broader context hasn't this grand experiment in American fascism been fun...I think not. The anger I hear in the right wing pundits has been telling me they see this administration unraveling on its own. We progressives still must work hard but this is worth watching. Watching these evil self-seeking people unravel themselves.Yet they brainwashed a country into fear, many American lives have been lost in a profit driven war,helped by photo ops to impart compassion when there is none. How many Iraqi mothers must bear the pain Cindy Sheehan is bearing here along with other Gold Star FAmilies. Grief knows all families no matter the nation we touch.And the biggest hypocrite is tis American president.Yes , I have taken only a few precious moments to enjoy the unraveling then there is work to be done .We know this, but lets not forget....not forget what we and other people have suffered in what may be the worst American administration, not only in my baby boomer lifetime but one that may rank#1. Mary Basombrio
a.k.a. placid.... A good thing has happened. ..I just "came out" basically available to the entire world ! This is grand moment for me amidst the insanity around us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Beautiful comment Mary Posted by: La Femme Nikita
» RE: Oh My! Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Oh My! Posted by: placid
"These things must be done delicately..."
Posted by: pgj on Sep 29, 2005 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Wicked Witch of the West's words are relevant to the potential outing of David Dreier. The reality is that there is no inherent shame in Mr. Dreier's sexuality, or in his long-term relationship. The perverse thing is, rather, his need to hide this aspect of his life. If he is outed, it must reveal the truth while not acting in the process as if that truth is actually shameful.
I would suggest that activists treat his elevation in the House leadership as a great step forward for gay people. It would also make sense to publicly express great bewilderment that he has acted in such consistent opposition to the interests of other gay people.
His mingling of his private relationship with his professional relationship with his aide should be treated exactly as it would be treated if the aide were instead a live-in girlfriend. Sexual orientation has nothing to do with the fundamental issue of unethical conduct.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» and delicately we must proceed Posted by: brasilaron
true that
Posted by: nycer on Sep 29, 2005 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kissinger was right. Only power would get a person to lie about their own identity to keep it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sexual Arousal and Power
Posted by: La Femme Nikita on Sep 29, 2005 9:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All right Alternet: I propose a topic to you. Let's talk about sexual arousal and power. The Eros of Power. Like that quote by Henry Kissinger. This for me is zeroing in on the truth. The target. Ground zero. The motivation for sex I was trying to get at on the discussion about teenage abortion.

I think we are going to have to bring in the teachings of Carl Jung. Psychology. Oh yes. Oh yes the Republican party is quite corrupt. Doesn't absolute power corrupt absolutely?

Well, I want to expose the dirty, seamy, steamy underbelly of the Republican party. Sex. Drugs. Affairs. Scandal. Out with it all. It's time to come clean America. No more hiding in the dark.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Burn baby burn
Posted by: packofwolves on Sep 29, 2005 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People who make rules should also have to live by them like the rest of us. Because a gay politician would dare vote against his own interests shows clearly that politicians don't have to abide by their own rules. Clearly politicians think they're better than we are. No wonder we're choking on corruption in our government, and drowning in debt. But shame on us because we've been letting these creeps get away with it. I can't believe that DeLay hasn't been indicted and imprisoned long before now. Hopefully justice will prevail and he will be found guilty for his crimes against us. If he isn't we really need to take back our government, shout long and loud and let the corruptors know we're not going to stand for it any more. What I say to all the corrupt politicians, including the Bushies is burn baby burn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Right on! Posted by: La Femme Nikita
Two gleeful words
Posted by: esactun on Sep 29, 2005 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have two gleeful words for today's GOP that may just ring a bell:

"Enough rope".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And if they don't ring a bell? Posted by: La Femme Nikita
Outing is a lot like Torture because ...
Posted by: AdamSelene11726 on Sep 29, 2005 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) It is inherently immoral
2) It provokes retaliation in kind
3) There's no guarantee it will accomplish the intended purpose

There should be things that a liberal 'just won't do,' and pandering to the assumed homophobia of Republican voters ought to be one of them.

Texas voters are not going to turn on Tom Delay because Rep. Dreier from California has been outed. They've tolerated election stealing, crony politics, torture, pretextual war, and more and more and more. Is it realistic to think they're going to abandon the GOP because one of its House members is ACCUSED of being Queer -- by Democrats ? I don't think so. Denial -- it's not just a river in Egypt, y'know.

On the other hand there are plenty of gay Democratic voters ... more gay than Democrat ... for whom the spectacle of straight Dems gloating and finger pointing over a California Republican's orientational issues is, at best -- unseemly.

Nah ... it's f'n offensive. It's no secret that we've got a lot of Progressives, whose enthusiasm for sexual diversity, and races other than their own goes only so far and no further. Homophobic snarkiness is exactly what they expect from liberal Breeders ... and as I write this, Randy Rhodes on Air America is living down to their worst expectations.

The Blue Dogs have already given the Chelsea Reform Democratic Club enough excuses to sit on their wallets and stay home on election day unless there's a gay candidate in the race. It's not that they'd ever vote Republican. Well, yeah -- in this year's Mayoral race it could happen.

No ... "delicately" is the word on this one.

Let the HRC and Dan Savage deal with the Log Cabin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks for all the references Posted by: La Femme Nikita
What provokes outing is the question that needs to be asked
Posted by: La Femme Nikita on Sep 29, 2005 7:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree, outing is immoral. But when does it become necessary? What motivates it?
Is it conscious?
Is it deliberate?
There are many forms of outing you know, not just outing of sexual orientation.
I say outing must be conscious and it must have a good reason but if it is conscious and it does have a good reason, then it is a powerful weapon in the fight against injustice. It is empowering for people who have been victimized. And yes, people are victimized in 2005.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

David Dreier
Posted by: shocknawe on Sep 29, 2005 8:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If David Dreier is, indeed, a cocksucker, here's hoping he gets hung out to dry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: David Dreier Posted by: cyclone
All the way to the top
Posted by: La Femme Nikita on Sep 29, 2005 8:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here I go. Perhaps my apologetics are not as bad as I thought. I told you all I was out to destroy the American Protestant Fundamentalist religion.
Well.
Here we go.
Who wants to join me?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: All the way to the top Posted by: cyclone
» I am not qualified for the job Posted by: La Femme Nikita
» RE: All the way to the top Posted by: Dirtman
pacto
Posted by: pacto on Sep 30, 2005 11:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel that all gay people.....should refuse to pay taxes....... that is the core reason for the founding of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.....against taxation without representation.......why should they suffer a denial of rights and yet pay taxes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great idea Posted by: beetruetoyou
» RE: Great idea Posted by: cyclone