Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Breaking the 1st Commandment of Governing

By Molly Ivins, AlterNet. Posted September 28, 2005.


Bush and his cronies have turned waste, fraud and abuse into national policy.
Advertisement

The Big Whew blew over Texas, leaving Port Arthur underwater and whole lot of stress across the state. It is highly stressful to be in a car with two adults, three children, the dog and the cat for a 12-to-20 hour trip from Houston to Austin, Dallas or San Antonio. It is also stressful to have two adults, three children, their dog and their cat move into your 1,200-square-foot house with you, especially if your sister-in-law thinks anyone who criticizes George W. Bush is a tool of Satan.

Stress-sensitive groups like Alcoholics Anonymous were doing land-office business in Texas this weekend, while bartenders served up the KatrinaRita. Austin, of course, was also having a music festival and offering free yoga and aromatherapy sessions to hurricane refugees. Austin musicians have adopted New Orleans musicians en masse: You're practically no one if you haven't got a Neville in your guest room.

The refugees trade tales of heroism and generosity, along with reports of the bad and the ugly. That's human nature, but there's nothing forgivable about organized government corruption.

I'm sorry, there are no exceptions: The first commandment of governing is Thou Shalt Not Steal the People's Money. Ronald Reagan came into office in 1980 on the mantra that he would rid the nation of Waste, Fraud and Abuse. He proceeded to raise the national deficit by $2 trillion with tax cuts and spending on the military in the face of a collapsing Soviet Union. This led to the peppy military procurement scandals of the late '80s and early '90s -- the $435 hammer and the $640 toilet seat.

When Newt Gingrich and Co. took power in 1994, they promised many "reforms" and spent millions of dollars on hearings and investigations -- the endless prosecution of Henry Cisneros may actually be a stronger case in point than the impeachment of Bill Clinton. Despite these splendid efforts, they never could find the Waste, Fraud and Abuse they claimed were the hallmarks of government. But this Bush administration has given us Waste, Fraud and Abuse galore.

The waste of money in Iraq is already into the billions, and the lack of accountability is fed by a Republican Congress that refuses to seriously investigate anything done by the Republican administration. The sums being overtly wasted are already staggering, and because there is no accountability, we can expect that situation not only to continue, but deteriorate.

With billions being allocated to clean up after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, you can already smell the corruption -- fat contracts awarded without competitive bidding. The New York Times reports, "More than 80 percent of the $1.5 billion in contracts signed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency alone were awarded without bidding or with limited competition, government records show, provoking concerns among auditors and government officials about the potential for favoritism or abuse."

"Provoking concerns," eh? Good old Times, eternally blah -- why doesn't it ever run a screaming headline that says, "You're Getting Ripped Off!" or "They are Stealing Your Money to Pay Off Their Political Pals!" The trouble with journalism in this country is that it's too damn polite.

Look, this is rank, nasty business -- corruption, cronyism and competence (the lack thereof) are the issues here. And as we have so recently and so painfully been reminded, when government is run by corrupt, incompetent cronies, real people pay a real price. There is nothing abstract about swollen bodies floating in flooded streets or dozens of old people dead in nursing homes.

Frankly, it's just a mercy most of Houston didn't drown in a giant traffic jam last week. Already, the corporate vultures are moving in -- contracts are arranged through people like Joe Allbaugh, the former FEMA director who brought in his old buddy Michael ("Heckuva job, Brownie") Brown to run the agency.

This pattern is not just one rotten agency: The arrest last week of David Safavian, the Bushie who oversaw contracts for the Office of Management and Budget, ties into a whole nest of cronyism. Safavian's friend and former lobbying partner is Jack Abramoff, who in turn is big buddies with Texas Rep. Tom DeLay.

The corporate clout in this administration is mirrored everywhere, with the same pattern of crony contracts. Allbaugh didn't just start getting contracts for politically connected firms after Katrina. He's been in Iraq, where he has a flourishing lobbying business precisely to help corporations get government contracts.

Already, Homeland Security is flooding what's left of New Orleans with mercenaries from the same private security contractors flourishing in Iraq. The Nation reports companies like DynCorp, Intercon Security, American Security Group, Blackwater, Wackenhut and an Israeli company called Instinctive Shooting International are all in New Orleans.

"Some, like Blackwater, are under federal contract. Others have been hired by the wealthy elite, like F. Patrick Quinn III, who brought in private security to guard his $3 million private estate and his luxury hotels, which are under consideration for a lucrative federal contract to house FEMA workers."

Baghdad on the Bayou for real.

Digg!

Molly Ivins writes about politics, Texas and other bizarre happenings.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Economic treason
Posted by: SFRosalyne on Sep 28, 2005 2:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This kind of crap really warrants a U. S. Constitutional amendment that requires fealty to the United States BEFORE you are permitted operate a business with the understanding that any of your business activity that is injurious your nation or its people can be considered treason and punished accrdingly. Maybe if a few high-ranking, pinstriped asshats from both the Cowardcrats and the Repugnicans doing life terms for their endemic financial and political shenanigans would go a long way to restoring this nation's honor and democratic rule of law - not the rule of overpaid business filth who hasn't known a real day's work or working for a living.

These men and women have done far more damage to America the Nation and its people than 500 terrorists slamming airplanes into buildings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: conomic treason Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: conomic treason Posted by: badkitty
Instinctive Shooting International????????????????
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 28, 2005 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Note to Dubya: A president can't pardon himself. Remember the howls of righteous indignation that came with Clinton's eleventh hour pardoning of Marc Rich? Prediction: the final days of this administration will be devoted excusively to the pardoning of the many felons within. And when I refer to the final days, I'm not talking about the week of 20 January 2009. The end will come much sooner than that, trust me on this one. By the time the opposition party retains control of the House of Representatives in January of 2007, the overwhelming majority of the American public will be demanding the impeachment of this dispicable twit. Call it a hunch but I have a sneaky feeling congress is going to oblige. If they can try to remove Bill Clinton from office for having an affair with a half-witted intern, this ought to be a snap.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontioernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm not holding my breath Posted by: taxidave
Sabotaging the Beast
Posted by: shangrilalad on Sep 28, 2005 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sabotaging the Beast

Along with corruption, cronyism and incompetence also add sabotage to the list of treasonous crimes committed by this congress and administration. The Rabid Right is committed to Starving the Beast as they refer to government and any federal program or agency that serves the common good. They do this by appointing political hacks to head agencies who are hostile to the intended purpose of those agencies. These bole weevils are appointed to top government jobs for the express purpose of corrupting, sabotaging, and destroying those agencies. If that isn’t treason, what is?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Theocratic Corruption
Posted by: menckenman on Sep 28, 2005 4:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That corporate con men. charlatans, swindlers and mountebanks run this country by enriching themselves and their friends under the cover of an ignorant and barbaric theology is now so depressingly obvious you'd think even Kansas would get it.

The Apostle James: "Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl, for your miseries shall come upon you."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Theocratic Corruption Posted by: terrillrj
» RE: Theocratic Corruption Posted by: menckenman
Corrupt government
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 28, 2005 4:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as special interests are allowed to finance political campaigns we will have these problems. Today, business and government are allied against the public. The voters do not control the government. We do not have a representative government. We beat Communism now we have to control Capitalism. The first step is campaign finance reform. join the revlution

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

let's not whitewash reagan
Posted by: jimsenter on Sep 28, 2005 5:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's not forget that Mr. Reagan merely CLAIMED to get waste out of government. Let's not forget those $600 toilet seats and $200 hammers the Pentagon bought.

and the whole idea of cost plus contracting, well that's just a great excuse for raiding the public trough.

Just like the neoCONS that came after him, Reagan's claims to fiscal restraint were nothing more than an excuse to gut programs that helped people who need help. We have seem what that "government is the problem not the solution" philosophy leads to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too much $$$$$$$
Posted by: crusty on Sep 28, 2005 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my humble opinion there is a simple reason why there is misappropriation of funds. Government draws its money from a general fund where there really is no control to where it goes. Creative accounting is at the root of this. What to do? Incorporate users fees to replace taxes for how money gets to the governemnt. Admittedly this probably works best at a local level. But if you start there there is a fighting chance. Also I have to say that ending subsidies for coporations would go an awful long way to making this scourge disappear. Since corporations and government are joined at the hip it is going to be very near possible for this to go away. But ya gotta try.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Too much $$$$$$$ Posted by: crusty
ECLECTICIST S JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Sep 28, 2005 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" Where has all the Patriot Americans gone Mrs Robinson...???" For sure, they are not in the American congress, neither Repugnitans nor Cowardcracts...!!!

These elected hooligans remind me of a "kid in the candy shop...", stuffing the candy(monies) in whatever pocket they could find and bragging how they got away with it(candy/money)..."Where has all the policemen gone , Mrs Robinson...???" Mike brown being grilled by the Republican inquiry committee with Mike blaming everyone, including the congrees, no monies, etc, and his failure to know how to lead...he even said it : "We need more management expertise...He personified himself as a "bonified bureaucract", because he was afraid to "stick his neck out" and demonstrate some semblence of a leader, a known characteristic of a bureaucract....This the "injury"...!!!

And, now the "insult"...Mike Brown resigned from FEMA, then was rehired as a "Consultant" by the same agency...???The republicans ripped their drawers on this one...Fire someone, anyone to turn the spotlight on other matters especially from FEMA, and all will go away because the rationale is : "The public does not know or care what we are doing..." Folks, it doesn"t work that way and I am here to state that the adminstration and the powers to be " do not know what power is and how to use it..." My Grandfather and Father used to state a proven adage as it applies to our so called leaders of our country : "Forty years a sheepherder and can't recognize a sheep..."

As an American with family lineage dating over 300 years in the Americas, with two Medal of Honor recipients, with volunteers to the miltary, etc... I personally resent Bush 43's "Papier Mache "approach to managing our country both economically and militarily... His "vacuity and banality " in his purpose to lead, to administer, and to enforce the "moral and ethical " laws to all peoples, especially Americans, will be his legacy...
S...JIM...RODRIGUEZ+++EL ECLECTICIST"
333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We all are guilty
Posted by: sausage on Sep 28, 2005 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1980, when acting California Governor Ronald Reagan defeated sitting President Jimmy Carter a majority of Americans cheered. Carter warned that Americans might suffer a little to gain energy independence, Reagan promised a "shinning city on a hill."

In 1984, when Reagan/Greenspanomics was running roughshod over the American economy Al From founded the Democratic Leadership Council and gave us "Third-Way" politics. "Third-Way, " as I understand it, is cozy up to business, promise'em tax incentives etc., cozy up to labor, promise'em jobs and stuff; once the tax incentives are passed and signed into law, screw labor.

In 1992, we elected Nelson Rockefeller's ghost, Bill Clinton, got the federal buget back on track, by making the rich pay just a little extra income tax, and NAFTA. NAFTA good, screws labor; taxes bad, rich plan revenge, enter Newt Gingrich.

In 1994, with "Contract On America" in hand Republicans sweep off-year elections and we get six years of blow-job investigations.

Look, I'm admit it, I'm guilty. I voted for Jimmy Carter, twice. Hell, I even helped in my own small way to get him unto the national stage. And I voted for Clinton, twice. And during that long and dismal run of American history I kept asking myself, "Who votes for these idiot Republicans?" While the question I should have been asking is, "Why aren't people voting their pocketbook?"

As long as the Democrats stay mum on the issues of tax and economic fairness, kiss big bussiness' butt and wait for the campaign contributions to roll in nothing's gonna change!

The Democratic Party needs to reform or die. That's the only way out of this national morass of cronyism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reagonomics - Voodoo Supply Side Spell
Posted by: rwcbanzai on Sep 28, 2005 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Molly, keep it up!
You forgot the greatest crime of Reagan and GOoPs during the economic DEPRESSION of REAGONomics and the GOoPonian legacy of trickle down economics (SUPPLY SIDE)!
Reagon and the GOoPs promoted the end of year taxes on Unemployment INSURANCE benefits. Imagine, your layed off (by no fault of your own) and at the end of the year your "kicked while your down" taxed on your by then expired (6months) unemployment benefits. For the layed off it was "don't piss on me and tell me its raining! No other insurance payment is taxed except UI! Of course only working people at that time knew... and who did it (Warning for KATRITA unemployed). A crime that is still ongoinnnnnnnn.
Fly your flag upside down (signal of GOoP distress)! Till this is our (blue collar) DEMAND SIDE country again!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Query?
Posted by: Annette on Sep 28, 2005 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And what are the infamous red staters who voted for Bush getting for it? They really ARE simple folk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Query? Posted by: menckenman
What Are We To Do?
Posted by: Sandra on Sep 28, 2005 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have a country that is controlled by big money and big business. The White House, the Congress, the Judiciary and the media are all controlled by big business and big money. We the people do not realize the extent of corruption and cronyism that is in place. To make matters worse, the elections are rigged through the voting machines. The recourse of the people, to vote the crooks and incompetents out of office is no longer valid. What are the people of this country to do?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Are We To Do? Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: What Are We To Do? Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: What Are We To Do? Posted by: churchofone
» RE: What Are We To Do? Posted by: Pearl in Colo
I just don't get it!
Posted by: fairygirl on Sep 28, 2005 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm just baffled at how this administration is allowed to continue its gutting of America. How many times does it take before Americans get tired of being ripped off? Perhaps some of this is a complete lack of information as the media has its head buried somewhere (with a few exceptions especially Molly, Tim Russert and Jon Stewart). Perhaps it takes having people die this winter because they couldn't afford home heating oil. I had hoped that the disaster in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast would spark a national debate about a lot of things, not the least of which is poverty in America. Clearly though based on "Heckuva job Brownie"'s testimony yesterday, it's back to finger pointing while giving no bid contracts to our favorite skanks. Moving to New Zealand is looking really good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Snake Oil and Brimstone, Ya'all?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Sep 28, 2005 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THEY'RE BAAAACK!! The Carpetbaggers –– but now they're sent directly by Washington. . .as a matter of fact, they're already running Washington.


(Note: Originally, Washington was built on a swamp, full of scum, stink, and creepy-crawly things –– and it hasn't changed at all in 200 years. . .)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

vigilantes
Posted by: Doubtom on Sep 28, 2005 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I still haven't had an answer to what specific authority these many Security units operate. Who are they accountable to in case they shoot and kill someone? When did we lose control?

I thought that only sworn officers representing some level of government could shoot to kill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: vigilantes Posted by: magistre
Some suggestions...Maybe.
Posted by: cstriker on Sep 28, 2005 10:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't really know where all this is going, but I have a few ideas that may help.

For starters, we should not be cutting taxes. I have thought about this repeatedly. Why don't we have a tax that is like 2% across the board regardless of income and allowing no deductions. I know 2% may be low, but the consistency is what matters. There should be no excuse for a rich person that can afford a CPA to have to pay any less tax on their dollar than the guy that works two or three jobs just to make ends meet.

Two, Direct Democracy is where it is at. Why do we need a president anymore. In this day of communication why can't we vote on each issue ourselves. Besides that, the lobbyists would then have to come to us for support. There would be no more chance for them to use corrupt political practices and politicians to get what they want. Then religion could play the appropriate role in individual decisions instead of being thrust out as a majority rule. Just because the administration is Christian doesn't mean the whole voting public is. Wasn't this country founded as a place for people to be able to worship freely. So why does God play any role in government aside from how individuals cast their vote. I would be fine with having a President if he was nothing more than a figurehead and representative to other nations. I think he has too much power now.

Three, if we are talking about waste, how much does it cost for the President to do these disaster assessment tours? Is it really necessary? I read somewhere that when the President travels, it automatically costs a few million dollars. Let's say it only costs one million. How many tours has he had since Katrina? 4, 5, or 6? Wow, 6 million bucks. How many houses would that build?

OK. Stick a fork in me. I'm done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Some suggestions...Maybe. Posted by: cstriker
» RE: Some suggestions...Maybe. Posted by: cstriker
tax dollars. . .
Posted by: katyaa on Sep 28, 2005 11:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
no taxation without representation. . . .since government has long since abandoned the common citizen, should we not abandon it (at least where our collective contribution is concerned)?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: tax dollars. . . Posted by: cstriker
Kevin Phillips, a Nixon Republican, wrote about the historically almost unprecedented...
Posted by: Sojourner on Sep 28, 2005 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...transfer of wealth to the ruling class since Reagan. He provided the tables and charts and all the numbers. And came to the conclusion that it was a consistent policy, even though Congress was run by Demos. That was published shortly after Bush II was first elected. I have not read any of his later books, but I assume none have withdrawn his conclusion.

The GOVERNING CLASS is a class unto itself. Anyone who retires from Congress and is not a millionaire is odd.

It is our economic view, as Americans, that the goal OF LIFE is to be able to buy yourself out of any possible danger. So we gamble...on slots, gaming tables, numbers rackets (excuse me, lotteries) and on elected officials.

As with all gambling, it means that sometimes we will lose and lose badly. As Molly and the posts here indicate, we have lost badly and are losing badly. (stop the rape of the public treasury!)

Gambling is an addiction as profound as with any of the objects of the so-called war on drugs. America is sick. Any illness that is not healed causes the patient to die. We are on a path to death.

I believe that health is stronger than sickness, that's why: Where there's life, there's hope. But we need the men (and women) in the white coats.

How about if we all go out and buy a lab coat, and wear it to identify ourselves as healers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Show me the money"!
Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com on Sep 28, 2005 1:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the US government is full of corrupt leaders and the scandal is as deep and evil as this site continually portrays, then why don’t your buddies in congress just order up an investigation and have all of them arrested and GWB impeached with all the mounds of damning evidence that you must have stashed away somewhere? If the Repubs. can pull it off then why cant the Demos.? Why perpetuate the “guilty until proven innocent” mentality with no evidence? It seems to me that there is a lot of conjecture, hopeful thinking and even many conspiracy theories but no facts to back any of it up. "Show me the money"! Get your fellow Bush haters in congress together and order an investigation and get them out of office if they are so guilty. If you can’t come up with anything other than speculation then you have nothing more than a personal vendetta. More importantly, without evidence you’re concocting allegations, and that’s dangerous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Show me the money"! Posted by: bogey11
The term - "WHITE HOUSE" has a racist symbolism
Posted by: ian_m64 on Sep 28, 2005 1:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
News Flash - Delay is busted. Now we have to get denis, Bill, george, donald and the gang in jail where they belong. When are we going to face up to the fact that we are only human and we want to believe in these people and their stories that they really care about all Americans. They do not care about anyone but their gang of theives. George Bush has no control over this White House. Rove and the gang are doing what ever they want and the POTUS is taking vacations at the White House and at Crawford.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fundamentalist Fascism
Posted by: shangrilalad on Sep 28, 2005 10:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in a progressive state, but even here the few people I know who dare speak out against the sociopaths running the country, do it in a whisper. So I know people are frightened. The only people not circumspect about talking politics are loud mouthed republican bullies. I know from personal experience that criticizing the rabid right can lead to reprisal. They mob up and attack individuals in lots of underhanded ways. I’ve learned to keep my mouth shut around people I don’t know I can trust. That’s how it is in a progressive town in a progressive state, so imagine what it must be like for progressives living in red states.

I now vent in blogs where anonymity provides some protection from reprisal. I wonder how many people there are like the posters on this board. Are there enough of us to make a difference in the next election? Or has the system become so corrupted that even the secret ballot can’t save our country from fundamentalist fascism?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fundamentalist Fascism Posted by: menckenman
» RE: Fundamentalist Fascism Posted by: shangrilalad
Non-violent protest
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Sep 28, 2005 11:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
PBS has been running lots of programs on nonviolent protest and how various bands have worked to enlighten people. Since I live in Tom DeLay's district, I have thought long and hard about some way of everyone protesting this government and demanding answers. Someone mentioned strikes and work slowdowns; that might be a way too. We have to find a way to end this horror and the terror it causes so many. We will finance the rebuilding of the Gulf Coast on the back of cuts in programs for the poor. This makes no sense to me. We need to organize and find a way to protest and get our demands met. Talking does not change things, action does.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Go get them Molly.
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Sep 30, 2005 5:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love what your saying.

I have been following with interest a little enterprise launched in Bush's OMB. They've been identifying which federal programs are just no damn good and ought to be done away with. Here's a taste:

Mismanagement by Objective

Why am I not surprised that the Bush Administration has discovered 22 “ineffective” federal initiatives that they want eliminated and that among these programs’ intended beneficiaries are preschool children, displaced workers, at-risk youth, migrant agriculture workers, low-income college students, the disabled and families that cannot afford housing. After all, if anybody deserves to feel the pinch, it’s a grimy lot like that.

Today’s Washington Post reports that Bush’s Office of Management and Budget ferreted out these rogue programs by using its Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART). By my count, 17 of the 22 no-account programs are aimed at helping the downtrodden, underprivileged and defenseless. That’s compassionate conservatism for you. Give enormous tax breaks to society’s most fortunate and gut the programs that benefit the struggling...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]