Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Outsourcing of Food

By Jason Mark, AlterNet. Posted October 6, 2005.


American farmers are battling a new kind of pest -- imports from international rivals who can produce essential foodstuffs cheaper than they can be grown here.
The Outsourcing of Food
The Outsourcing of Food

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Jason Mark

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Ronny Sloan is a farmer to his roots. Sloan's father was a farmer, and so was his grandfather, and his great grandfather, and everyone that family history can remember since the Sloans moved from Kentucky to Illinois in the early 19th century. Today Sloan and his four sons farm near the tiny town of Pana, Illinois, where they grow corn, soybeans and oats.

The Sloans are successful farmers, their 6,000-acre operation large by local standards. In recent years, however, they have had to grapple with a problem never encountered before -- foreign competition.

"Things are tough, the farm economy is tough," says Sloan, his voice a rural twang that sounds closer to Mississippi than Missouri. "We used to be the big player and had 75 percent of the soy market. That's not the case. We're now second place, behind Brazil. That's definitely hurting us."

The Sloans are not alone. From the apple orchards of western Washington to the tomato fields of Florida to the potato heartland of Idaho, American farmers are battling a new kind of pest -- imports from international rivals who can produce essential foodstuffs cheaper than they can be grown here.

After decades of being the world's top food producer, the U.S. is poised to become a net importer of agriculture products, according to data from the US Department of Agriculture. By the end of the decade, Brazil is expected to eclipse the U.S. as the number one food grower.

Call it the outsourcing of food. Following in the footsteps of blue-collar workers and, more recently, white-collar employees, the U.S.'s two million farmers face the prospect of being offshored as well.

The shift to foreign food production is clearly bad news for farmers, who have struggled for years to get their sale prices to match the costs of production. The outsourcing of food is also troubling for the U.S.'s ever-growing debt burden, since agricultural products were among the few bright spots in the country's deficit-burdened trade balance. For now, consumers benefit by getting lower food prices. But, say some food policy analysts, the U.S. could, in the long run, face a food security threat if present trends continue.

The U.S. has always been an importer of commodities that can't be cultivated here -- coffee and cocoa, bananas and mangos. But now U.S. markets are being flooded with products that Americans are accustomed to growing themselves. An increasing percentage of the produce you buy at the grocery store comes from fields and orchards thousands of miles away. If you've had any apple juice lately, it's more than likely that the concentrate used to make it was produced in China. Those raspberries you love may have been grown in Chile, the tomatoes in Mexico, and the avocados in Central America.

Even those most American of foods -- good old meat and potatoes -- often are imported. Scandinavia, for example, exports baby back ribs to the U.S., while a portion of our spuds come from abroad. Potato processing giant J.R. Simplot recently laid off 625 workers at one of its French fry factories in Oregon and plans to have the work done overseas.

Reggie Brown, vice president of the Florida Tomato Exchange, a trade group that represents the state's $500 million tomato industry and which has suffered serious loses in the last decade, puts the issue succinctly: "The fundamental question is, 'Is it America's long term interest to produce these crops here, or to have them produced elsewhere and shipped in?' We feel it's in Americans' best interest to be a producer of our own food supply. But there doesn't seem to be a national agenda to do that. The opposite seems to be the national agenda."

Trading Away the Farm

Many farmers and academics say that a decade of free trade agreements is responsible for the plight facing U.S. agriculture. During the heated debates over the creation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Washington political establishment told U.S. growers that the new trade deals would be a net benefit for farmers. In hindsight, it appears that the politicians promised too much.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Jason Mark is the co-author, with Kevin Danaher, of "Insurrection: Citizen Challenges to Corporate Power." He is researching a book about the future of food.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
America - In a Baby's Crib
Posted by: needlefoot on Oct 6, 2005 3:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NAFTA and corporate America (seeking that last tiny bit of profit) have been more than harmful to this country. Outsourcing has crippled our ability to manufacture. And now to grow produce! And supply our own food!
I see a huge baby's crib in which Americans are wailing, their arms flailing upward, seeking sustenance from their adult caretakers. We won't have the means to take care of ourselves if the outsourcing continues. If we cannot feed our own people, manufacture our own commodities, solve our own problems, then we will have nothing, being totally dependent on everyone else in the world to supply our needs. Just think how vulnerable we are going to be.
I have never been a "protectionist", but I am beginning to think that we need to let corporate America (and its products) go, start investing in/creating companies that will produce both the jobs and the commodities we need to be a self-supporting nation. We need to seriously think about becoming producers again. This would be so much better than remaining corporate America's perfect ideal: the never-ending consumer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Food Origin Labeling....
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa on Oct 6, 2005 4:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is WHY we need food origin labeling.... I personally will NOT buy food unless I KNOW it is grown here in the USA. I do not trust ANYTHING from a third world country. Who knows what kinds of poisons was used? At least here, I know what I'm poisoning myself with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Food Origin Labeling.... Posted by: Doubtom
local more than ever
Posted by: crusty on Oct 6, 2005 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a small vegetable farmer. I rely strictly on local markets and restaurants. There is no reason that we need to be doing this. There is enough farmland still available to grow our own food. Granted not all of it is in really good shape.
What needs to happen is we need to change our attitudes about food. We continuously demand such food from other countries because we want tomatoes in January or pineapple or whatever. The single best thing one can do is support local farmers. I do not neccessarily mean just by buying our food, but also if there is a plot of land available to be farmed let a farmer know. Many of us are looking for more land or to be in a stable situation. Most small farmers do not own thier land and some have really bad relationships with the land owner. I have been extremely lucky in that my landowners WANT me there.
Not only does it make sense health wise, It makes sense ecologicly.In just transportation alone food has to travel at least 3000 miles to your table....think about the gas etc. Keep the foood $ in your community and your community will flourish. Real homeland security starts with all of us getting to know our neighbors and buying from local vendors where possible.
I know that not every where has alot of small farmers. There is a great website called localharvest.org where you can find your small time producers. OR stores that sell food not grown overseas. THere are plenty of ways to get around this. It just takes more work.
Our prices are higher but thats due to the fact that you the consumer are paying for the freshness of the product. The other reason why our prices are higher is becasue the price really reflects the true cost of the item. If you think that we are laughing all the way to the bank, you are sadly mistaken. It is a very thin profit margin that we reap from this. Part of it is the fact that there is so much cheap food. But thats just it its cheap plastic crap.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: local more than ever Posted by: bettsoff
» RE: local more than ever Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
» RE: local more than ever Posted by: Tubeguru
Hoist on your own petard
Posted by: ciccio on Oct 6, 2005 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Tanganyika became indepentent in the early 60's, one of its major cash crops was sisal, most of which was exported raw. The country invested heavily to encourage local production, to export the finished product, encourage local
industry and employment. It worked until the petrochemical
industry decided polypropelene is so much better, cheaper,
with more consistent quality ect. ect. ect.; the American farmer was only to eager to embrace this new home-made
product, to support the all-american. The Tanganyika sisal
industry is dead, the centre of it, Tanga, is a ghost town, the
factories are rotting away.

The WTO and IMF are basicaly American creations, with American agenda, the basis is the trickle down school of
ecconomics. The major result has been the explosion of
multinationals, corporate growth unpreccedented in history
with profit levels to match. One of the first Nobel prizes for
ecconomics was awarded for the Hekscher-Ohlin theory of
international trade, their studies showed that trade between
countries with ample labour but little financial muscle and
highly industrialized countries was profitable to both, but only
provided that capital and labour not be shifted around.

For nearly a century American agribusiness with its motto:
more more more, bigger bigger bigger, faster faster faster,
has pushed 1000's of farmers all over the world to the brink
of extinction. You reap what you sow, the chickens are now coming home to roost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How does it feel to witness karma, America?
Posted by: neilemac on Oct 6, 2005 5:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How does it feel to be succumbed by the same policies the US along with the IMF [International Monetary Fund] have done to nations like Jamaica. I recently (last night) witnessded a DVD entitled "Life + Debt" released in 2001 which explores the wrath of 'globalization' on that island nation. This is a line from the film and references visiting tourists to Jamaica.
"When you sit down to eat your delicious meal, it's better that you don't know that most of what you are eating came off a ship from Miami."

After years and years of exploiting other nations resources, the effects have finally come home to roost in America. Pity? No, from me; you've allowed exploitation of others for far too long, take it on the chin or wake up and rid yourself of the crippling policies that you now know reek havoc on an economy. As a reference to your recent lack of good judgment, look whom you have put in the White House. Consider your demise as 'instant karma' for electing BusCo/Cheneyburton whom put corrupt rightwing cronies in places of power (e.g. Wolfowitz as head of World Bank). Come on America, take off the blinders; or is that your head stuck between the stars and stripes of patriotic idiocy?
namasté

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

another view of US agriculture
Posted by: dillard323 on Oct 6, 2005 5:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The United States has been dumping its excess agricultural products into other countries for a long time. Also, the US government subsidizes many of the agricultural products grown by US farmers. Both of these economic elements drive down the price of local farmers' products in other countries, and eventually the farmers in those countries can no longer farm because they cannot compete with the US products' prices. Other countries have been dealing with competition from US agricultural products for a long time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thoughts from a farmer
Posted by: zooeyhall on Oct 6, 2005 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a small-scale dairy and grain farmer in Northeast Nebraska. If you could see the devastation that has been in my local area, over the last 10 years especially, it would just break your heart.

One point I would like to make especially in regard to this article. Haven't we learned from our experiences with oil what it means to be dependent on unstable outside sources for a vital product? We have outsourced manufacturing jobs, then white collar work, and now even our food!

I can remember well the gas shortages of the '70s, when you couldn't even get gas at times, regardless of the price. Can you imagine the panic there would be if this happened with food? Imagine going into the grocery store and being greeted by a sign: "Only 1 loaf of bread per family per week".

It seems as though greed is the only worthwhile motivation to anything in this world anymore. It's both the question and the answer. I'm not the kind of person to get apocolyptic, but can it be that America is in its decline?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: thoughts from a farmer Posted by: badkitty
Use labels
Posted by: silkreed on Oct 6, 2005 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a shopper, I would love to see "Grown in the USA" labels, or "Grown with Pride in Pennsylvania" or "Grown in Pawtucket, Rhode Island," whatever. If everything grown in the USA had such labels, everything Else could be regarded as imports, no matter if we can't get the bill passed. I know that locally grown produce is likely to taste better and be more nutritious, so I'm willing to pay more for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Entangling alliances led to this
Posted by: ChrisBieber on Oct 6, 2005 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the whining about "free trade" and "corporate greed" miss the point. Government has been allowed by by ignorant Americans to become judge/jury/coach/umpire on trade and business and now it has become internationalized through the United Nations and its henchmen the IMF/IBRD and the WTO which ARE(IS) NOT FREE TRADE but SOCIALISM. The goal of leveling the world HAS TO BE BY LEVELING THE US and the way theyve done it is through the SOCIALISM of INTERDEPENDECE(ENTANGLING ALLIANCES) with the US becoming DEPENDENT on EVERYTHING! The only thing worse then having the COMMUNIST CHINESE bankroll our debt/housing market is having Germans/EU control our food...cant remember the name but there is a German company that OWNS 90% of the SEED PRODUCTION for food crops...hmmmmmmmmm not an accident....
Remember it is NOT free trade it is SOCIALIST LEVELING

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ntangling alliances led to this Posted by: liberalibrarian
» RE: ntangling alliances led to this Posted by: liberalibrarian
Look on the bright side...
Posted by: guess on Oct 6, 2005 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans can look forward to being naked,starving,illiterate Bible-thumping slaves ruled by a military dictatorship. Hallelujah!

Seriously though,follow the advice of the farmer above:find the local farmers in your area through localharvest.org and look in your area newspaper for farmers' markets and community gardening organizations.

Also learn how to grow and preserve your own food if at all possible. Drying and canning are good methods;freezing is also an option but I wouldn't rely on it too much given the price and instability of the energy supply. Even apartment dwellers can grow small quantities of vegetables. Start by googling vegetable gardening,biointensive farming,organic gardening,etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No sympathy for an industry on the dole.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Oct 6, 2005 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a former IT worker, I have no sympathy for the American farmer and their arrogant attitude to those of us that have hit very hard times. US agricultural products are heavily subsidised by the American taxpayer. Farmers and agribusiness have been on the dole so long that they have not been able to compete fairly for quite some time now.

Pork from Washington is the only thing that keeps agribusiness in business, and I'm sick of it. The US is acting no better than the old Soviet Union in purchasing products like rice, sugar, wheat, cotton, citrus, fruits, vegetables, meat products and a host of others at prices well above world market prices.

I'm from Nebraska and visited my relatives and friends of my parents on Iowa and Kansas farms all of my life. Fourty years ago, their farm products were the best in the world at prices that were a good value. Does anyone remember when milk used to coat the glass that you drank it from, or that USDA Choice was the meat on the counter, or that you could stand up toast in the middle of an egg yolk that was almost orange and the egg was perfectly round in the frying pan? With the rise of corporate farming and GM foods, the product quality has gone done the tubes and the subsidies keep going up.

I've been to Latin America and know that their products are every bit as good as ours. It is time to re-educate and reallocate the farming community to more productive areas as most of them are a drain on the economy. Agribusiness is business and American agriculture can't compete in the new world economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You like new world economy? Posted by: Michiganman
Barbara
Posted by: Barbara on Oct 6, 2005 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for years, American people have been " having it all" at the expense of poorer countries. And,.....being very superior about it all as well. (Perhaps the attitude is a throw back to the days of slavery in your country ) . What is now happening in your country has been happening in South America, through your Govenerment for a long time now., to the detrement of their economy, political stability, etc. It's all well and good to watch CNN while having your dinner, not being concerned that much of your meal was produced by people living below the poverty level. But, there is a saying. ' What goes around, comes around".
When a Government of a country is driven and " owned " by multi corporations, your country is in danger. Because corporations are not loyal. They are designed for profit. Not humanitarian reasons. They alter the legislation of countries, to benifit them. Not the population. It's very difficult for citizens to influence and manage corporations., when it is the corporations who have control of your Government, and your military. They even have their own " private military" to protect their interests.
So,...if corporations are only for profit and it's corporations who control your Government, who have you got left to look after the interests of the American citizens ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barbara Posted by: Gatsby
» RE: Barbara Posted by: hirondelle
» RE: Barbara Posted by: Gatsby
» RE: Barbara Posted by: crusty
» Barbara Posted by: Barbara
Wake up clueless Americans
Posted by: acaryatid on Oct 6, 2005 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every policy, treaty and pact benefits key American Corporations. Every claim of caring for the public is #@#$%$. Below a UK piece tells why we're an importer of foods. This and other coverage like family farmers going under from Monsanto attacks are posted at site below.

"http://www.organicconsumers.org/monlink.html"

Monsanto's GE Seeds are Pushing
US Agriculture into Bankruptcy

Genetically engineered crops are causing an economic disaster for farmers in the U.S. So says a new report released by Britain's Soil Association. The report is a massive compilation of data showing GE crops have cost American taxpayers $12 billion in farm subsidies in the past three years.

"Within a few years of the introduction of GM crops, almost the entire $300 million annual US maize exports to the EU had disappeared, and the US share of the soya market had decreased," the report said. In addition, the study says that GE crops have lead to an increased use of pesticides, while resulting in overall lower crop yields. (more)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rod from Canada Posted by: Rod from Canada
American farmers or International agribusiness?
Posted by: stormrider on Oct 6, 2005 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a difference here; I think the comment about buying from local farmers is right on. Think about how much energy is expended to send tomatos and bananas halfway around the world. I feel that supporting local agriculture is a matter of safety and security. Agribusiness corporations have grown so large that they are better thought of as independent stateless entities; if the U.S. economy goes belly-up, as it seems about to, these corporations will pull their assets out of the US faster then you can blink. At the same time, the expansion of biofuels on a global basis is creating a whole new market for farmers. This of course leads into the question of energy inputs vs. energy outputs on a farm, the goal being to minimize energy inputs (oil, fertilizer, electricity) and maximize outputs (crops). We are all going to have to get used to a new way of life; we may well find our food choices limited to seasonal fresh produce and canned preserves in off-seasons, and we'll have much less meat in our diet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

..a bit of truth for you
Posted by: Ely Whitney on Oct 6, 2005 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I come from a farm background. From a time when you could make an honest living working 4 quarters of land without the assistance of chemcals and fertilizers, but by being a steward of the land, by that practicing crop rotation and choosing crops and vegitation that would sustain the land.

Back then the land was a living entity and as long as you were responsible in what you were doing to it the land would provide to you a bountiful harvest.

Enter the Monsantos of the world, corporate entities who convinced those farmers that they could produce more by using chemicals to increase production regardless of what it does to the land. A few years of that and the land was producing less, and what it did produce required chemical sustinance. In the end to have the same quality of life on the farm you had to have more and more land.... the machines had to become bigger and bigger and so on. In the late 40s early 50s you could have a damn fine tractor for around 2500 dollars, today a tractor will cost you several thousands of dollars and will even get you into the hundreds of thousands of dollars, meanwhile a bushel of wheat has increased in the area of 60% from the end of the second world war.

My father used to say in regards to subsidies... they were pathetic and they should never have been. He used to say that the subsidy was not for the farmer but it was the governments way to make sure that the consumer in America had cheap food.... if you really and I mean really look a the state of the agri industry today and then compare the prices of the raw products today to what the prices were back 50 years ago you will soon find little has changed for the farm gate price except an astronomical incease in production costs.

So who has benefited most from subsidies???? I will give you a hint...It was not the farmer.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ..a bit of truth for you Posted by: Ely Whitney
» RE: ..a bit of truth for you Posted by: brysoncg
American farmers partly responsible
Posted by: redbeard on Oct 6, 2005 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American farmer, 60 years ago, raised his own food as well as everybody else's. Today he shops at the grocery store for meat, milk, vegetables, and eggs. And gets a poorer product for a much higher price. Because he is no longer self-sufficient, the farmer MUST get a certain price for his crops, or he will go under. Since his competitors set the price he gets, guess what's going to happen?

The American farmer, 60 years ago, used farming techniques that generally worked with nature instead of against her. Chemical fertilizers destroy soil and reduce nutrient content of the food produced. There are several state agriculture departments who have shown this experimentally. Use manure instead of chemicals, let land lie fallow under a green manure, and you get better crops afterwards.

The American farmer, some years ago, fell for the idea that having a new tractor every so many years was a necessity for survival. Tractors are expensive. Many farmers went into debt to do this. I know MANY farmers who have this problem - a whopping debt for equipment, and, again, who sets the price they get for their product?

Equipment manufacturers make their equipment less tough, too; it breaks quicker, so replacements are needed more often. There are some exceptions to this. Also, many farmers I knew complained about not being able to fix the equipment themselves, the way they used to be able to.

Most small farmers I knew were NOT subsidized (none of the ones I knew got government checks); large agribusiness, however, seems to be (I can't prove this, but I think this is so).

But the farmer is not alone responsible for his own plight. The American consumer, wanting fresh vegetables in wintertime, CHEAP, creates the demand that sends buyers overseas. The American consumer, choosing cars that get lousy gas mileage, drives demand for gasoline upward, driving the price upward.

But the oil companies are also responsible; it's amazing how fast gas price rose when Katrina was only THREATENING to strike Louisiana. The gas refineries hadn't been shut down, and the price had already risen a shocking amount.

And it's amazing how, at the beginning of every summer, some refinery will go offline for maintenance - reducing supply and increasing prices. Farmers need gas in the summer - and so do tourists in America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Tracking Subsidy Payments Posted by: acaryatid
Subsidized Corporate Welfare
Posted by: acaryatid on Oct 6, 2005 9:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every subsidized industry is in failing health. The Airlines are another example and it started with the oil and railroads. The truth is that the government was taken over by the Russell trust and our taxes are funnelled off to them as an organized crime ring looting our Treasury.

Why else does a company like GE who can price and stock lightbulbs in every corner of the globe need a whole division within defense to track their contract fraud? Do they not have calculators on Capitol Hill? No, stealing is the game.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't be fooled
Posted by: acaryatid on Oct 6, 2005 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The same bankers who control the FED have been behind the global banking operations. We're told China and other nations are the driving forces but go to the World Bank website and track the US banking investment history in those economies.

It's the same bankers with new front organizations. It is a global play but foreign nationals are not the enemy. The enemy is within but you're right the goal is to bankrupt the Americans. They're doing a bang up job there!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Know your poisons?
Posted by: acaryatid on Oct 6, 2005 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you really knew what's in American food you would insist that it be labeled so you could eat toxic free varieties which meet EU standards.

Many African and South American countries produce varieties far safer than those grown here in the USA. Canada and European countries grow varieties banned for consumption by humans in their own countries but suitable for export only to the USA.

All the poisons are from the big US chemical giants and they bend the rules to get toxins to the table no matter what it takes. Last week there was a bill before Congress to weaken the organic standards. The liars label to decieve and the most abused term is Natural.

I doubt many people have a clue what they're swallowing. Go to www.organicconsumers.org and see if the American standards are what you thought they were. I'll bet you're not surprised, but horrified.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

outsourcing of food
Posted by: juana on Oct 6, 2005 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's very dangerous to rely on foreign growers for food. And very foolish. Farmers are paid subsidies to grow food so we will be assured of an adequate food supply. Excess is sold to foreign countries, many unable to produce all their food needs. Surplus is also given away in times of disaster(CARE). When a foreign supplier experiences excess demand -from us and from their own country - who's going to get the food? You guessed it. It's one thing to pay $3/gal for gas. It's another to starve. It's ironic that most countries, even developing ones, have strict restrictions on food imports. They import only what they can't grow/make themselves for the most part. USDA is out to serve the agribusiness farmer and big business, not to serve the consumer or the family farmer, who has provided food for us for decades. Outsourcing of food is a serious problem. We need to let our congress people know that this is not OK.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: outsourcing of food Posted by: jreinhart1
» What is the difference jrhat1 Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: Shop at Walmart...not! Posted by: crusty
What about all the advantages?!!!
Posted by: Habaro on Oct 6, 2005 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like wasting even more petroleum by having it shipped from over a thousand miles away instead of just a few hundred miles--kinda like wasting fuel by driving to the store across town instead of picking fruit from the trees in your own yard. Oh wait, trees are just meant to provide wood that can be sliced thin and dyed green to make money so we can BUY fruit...nevermind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A call for sanity
Posted by: gp on Oct 6, 2005 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am surprised to read the angry, xenophobic comments on the pages of Alternet today.

To the poster who said "I do not trust ANYTHING from a third world country. Who knows what kinds of poisons was used?" --your statement is disturbing. I wonder what you eat when you travel outside the US. Also, the US has been importing food for decades, without labeling it. Some produce simply do not grow in the US (or not in the amount needed), and a large percentage must be imported so US consumers can enjoy them year-round –coffee, bananas, avocados quickly come to mind.

As for its quality, imported food must meet the standards imposed by the FDA, which have been toughened due to bio-terrorism concerns. Your imported food has been inspected and approved by FDA and US Customs Service agents.

As for Barbara's comments: they are welcome. Pointing out the obvious, i.e. that the US has corrupted political processes in Latin American countries, is not hateful. There are many people in the US who live sane and compassionate lives. The US government is a different beast altogether (Go ahead and google Abramoff, Delay, Frist, etc.)

So, who is responsible for this mess? The article says it very clearly: It is the middleman. And the US government that has prostituted the principles of good governance in order to line their pockets. And, yes, consumers too. But who can resist a low price? Especially when you already have problems making ends meet, because your company filed for bankruptcy (or were laid off from your decently-paying job), and your new job does not carry health benefits.

Yet another case where what is good for business is not good for country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A call for sanity Posted by: Habaro
» RE: A call for sanity Posted by: crusty
» The FDA Posted by: gp
Let the consumer decide...
Posted by: Bleacher_Dave on Oct 6, 2005 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need country of origin labeling so consumers can make informed choices. In a free society, what else can we do? Eliminate choice and require everyone to pay higher prices? I don't think that's a good choice either.

Don't forget Community Supported Agriculture. Contract with a local farmer to buy whatever he produces during the season. It has worked well for us - we get freshly picked produce delivered every week, the farmer knows she has customers for what she plants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sustainability, buy local
Posted by: Bekki on Oct 6, 2005 4:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am grateful to live in a community that is supportive of its small farmers. I live in rural southeast Ohio, Athens Co., and our farmer's market features lots of organic farmers and farmers who won't use pesticides, selling everything from eggs and meat to veggies and fruit. It is not an easy life and folks don't expect to get rich, but they know their customers (who are their neighbors) and their customers depend on them to produce excellent quality food that is raised with conscience and consciousness. During the peak months there are lots of foods to choose from, and a small number of producers are committed to extending their season so that I can get some fresh local produce 10 or 11 months of the year. Amazingly, especially during the peak growing season, locally grown produce isn't necessarily going to cost you more than store bought. Many of our growers stay competitive with the regular stores, but even paying a bit more is worth it to have fresh-picked, vitamin rich foods.
If you can't find a source for locally grown food where you are, it's worth growing some of it yourself. Some cities have community gardens (ours does). And it's worth looking around for farmers who want to supply individual households-- I have friends in Rochester NY for instance who buy a lot of their food from local folks they met at the farmer's market.

What I like best is knowing that I'm supporting people who depend customers like me to raise their families and hold onto their farms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1920 an 1930s
Posted by: john henry on Oct 6, 2005 7:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the people of these days took care of each other then the programs came a long they gave people money for doing nonthing then that worked good so they gave farmer money not to grow crops but wanted them to grow all they could an could not sell it for any good money so the med. size farmer got out an found a job an corp. took over here then move to other county with the right help from the dc people making deal in the poor countys for the corps. buddys an there pockets are full in the 1970s the people in the know told me that in my life time you can take a 100.00 dollars to the store an walk out with two sack of food an have nothing an we are dam near there an there is no stopping them only way to stop it is to grow you own food an cann it your own self an this will take away from them an meat from your county buddys an it will be better but you need to know them

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good point Posted by: Michiganman
What's wrong with cheap food?
Posted by: Gun Bunny on Oct 6, 2005 7:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wal-Mart's been financing Red China for years with the same underlying principle: Americans want cheep food and cheap textiles. Are any of the article's whiners willing to give up Wal-Mart?

gb

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unsettling of America
Posted by: crusty on Oct 6, 2005 7:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The best book on this topic is the Unsettling of America by Wendell Berry.... It is a bit difficult to read, but it clearly states alot of the examples that some of the people with farm experiences or childhoods quite concisely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oil is our food.
Posted by: floaty on Oct 7, 2005 12:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Richard Manning, "Against the Grain: How Agriculture Has Hi-jacked Civilization" (North Point Press) says agriculture has always been a way to concentrate wealth - to our general detriment. America's founding fathers were noticably healthier than their European contemporaries, because the soil of America was so much richer in nutrients, the European soil having been severely depleted by then. No more - the U.S. industry now spends about ten calories of fossil fuel energy to make each calorie of (processed) food - and this not including the transportation costs. We've used up the soil; now we're eating the oil. An excellent synopsis, by Richard Manning, can be found at http://www.harpers.org/TheOilWeEat.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hurrah For Slow Food
Posted by: floaty on Oct 7, 2005 1:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill McKibben has had many fine articles on AlterNet, - the latest is http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/25878/ - and there's a great feature piece by him at the Harper's site - http://www.harpers.org/TheCubaDiet.html - in which he recounts how Cuba, initially clobbered by the fall of the USSR, has been able to return to an almost self-sustaining agriculture. It's an encouraging story, and full of practical advice (eg. what to do when there are no spare parts for the heroic Soviet tractors). He poses a provocative question: if Cuba were free, the embargo lifted, how long could they hold onto their hard-won meal-a-day, before globalization and agribusiness pushed them into the same dire straights as the rest of us? It's well worth reading. He has another piece there which may seem off-topic, but I think it goes to the heart of the problem (greed), so I also recommend it to all you thoughtful, caring people: http://www.harpers.org/ExcerptTheChristianParadox.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bikey
Posted by: bikey on Oct 7, 2005 3:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Readers,
You are sadly misled here. This is no foreign invasion, this is the result of forcing US IP laws down the throats of the entire world through the 1995 World Trade Agreement. The US got everyone to change their laws (and even this they found insufficient, to the degree that one of the first things they did upon marching into Iraq was to force their laws on that poor unfortunate country at the barrel of a gun), which in turn resulted in billions of dollars flowing into large US corporations. Developing countries only asked that US markets be opened in turn to their primary export agriculture (and secondarily, textiles). This has barely begun to happen, ten years later. While I (half) appreciate the plight of US farmers, you can't have everything. Stop the IP rip-off and you may get your American food back (then you must decide if that's really what you want...).
Bikey

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bikey Posted by: maxpayne
Strain on other countries has been increased thanks to food outsourcing
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 8, 2005 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is another reason Thomas Frank makes even more sense when he stresses that farmers in middle America have been thrashed thanks to agri-business takeover at its worst which no doubt opened the door to food outsourcing. And don't expect other countries to be filled with any more happy farmers than before the outsourcing of food spiralled out of control. Whether we're talking Latin America or the Far East, the strain and major stress placed on those farmers has also skyrocketted. Sadly, though, this is what the "free trade" jerks call the growth of globalism even when it ain't so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wake up America
Posted by: Ingarose on Oct 8, 2005 7:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have read your article and the numerous posts after it. Let's get real. Americans will not wake up until it hits them in the butt. We have only been in Walmart twice and that was too much, but apparently not for thousands of Americans, judging by the overfilled parking lots.

Remember, it was not too long ago the majority of Americans were behind Bush and his approval ratings soared. We just believed everything he and his cronies said and did what he told us to do. How many ever saw the signs of decline on the horizon?

Well, Katrina put a little dent into things but believe me not enough yet for the majority of Americans to wake up. Floating dead corpses in New Orleans will soon become history and many will continue to happily shop at Walmart not caring one iota what real peril the USA faces.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bikey
Posted by: bikey on Oct 24, 2005 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where do you think all those out-of-season vegetables have been coming from all your life? Americans care less about what is in their food (or how it tastes minus additives) than almost any country in the world, and the food industry cares even lessl Save your nationalism for a more worthy target (if you can find one).
bikey

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

an eye for an eye
Posted by: Blaugaia on Nov 14, 2005 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And just what do you think America has done to farmers in México and other countries, uhu?????????????????? Mexican farmers cannot compete with the low-cost production of the USA in many food products, it is only fare that other countries are selling their products to this country.....it is called capitalism, didn't you know?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]