Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Failed Drug War

By Charles Shaw, AlterNet. Posted September 28, 2005.


An ex-convict says we cannot address poverty and race in America, nor can we talk about needless death and expense, without addressing the drug war.
Advertisement

Malcolm X once said, "Any person who claims to have deep feeling for other human beings should think a long, long time before he votes to have other men kept behind bars -- caged. I am not saying there shouldn't be prisons, but there shouldn't be bars. Behind bars, a man never reforms."

On Friday, September 9, I became one of the roughly 25,000 people released from an Illinois prison this year -- 600,000 nationally -- after completing only 10 weeks of a one-year sentence due to extreme overcrowding. My crime was victimless -- simple possession of a controlled substance, specifically, a small amount of marijuana and MDMA.

But as the rare upper-middle class, educated white American in prison, I found myself in a truly alien, self-perpetuating world of crushing poverty and ignorance, violent dehumanization, institutionalized racism, and an entire sub-culture of recidivists, some of whom had done nine and 10 stints, many dating back to the '70s.

Most used prison as a form of criminal networking knowing full well they would be left to fend for themselves when released. We were told on many occasions that an inmate was worth more inside prison than back in society. Considering it costs an average of $37,000 a year to incarcerate offenders, and the average income for black Americans is $24,000, and only $8,000-$12,000 for poor blacks, one can easily see their point.

But unlike the vast majority of ex-offenders, I was fortunate enough to return to an established life and work, and a support system of friends, family, and colleagues.

The Chicago Tribune reported this year that about two-thirds of the more than 600,000 ex-convicts released in 2005 will be re-arrested within three years, and about half will return to prison for a new crime or violation of parole. Despite having "paid their debt to society," once released, their punishment is not nearly over. These days there is little to no hope of any real reform, as within the various Departments of Corrections, "correction" is a painfully misleading euphemism for the warehousing of offenders.

There are few, if any, re-entry programs for ex-offenders and virtually no jobs or social services to help keep them afloat in an increasingly difficult and unforgiving society. Thus, most ex-offenders have no choice but to return to their old crime-infested neighborhoods, destitute and desperate to survive any way they can. A significant majority of the new crimes or parole violations are drug related, often nothing more than testing positive on a monthly drug screen.

This lack of any employment, training, or rehabilitative opportunities has created a permanent underclass of ex-offenders who remain trapped in poverty, unable to provide for themselves or their families without resorting to the few, generally illegal means available to them. Faced with their very survival, most have no compunction about engaging (or re-engaging, as the case may be) in drug dealing rather than starving.

What may be even worse is that for some, their ongoing "crimes" are only those of association, or in some cases, the consequences of being black and poor. Laws prohibiting ex-felons from associating with other ex-felons and gang members, such as the Illinois Street Gang Terrorism Omnibus Prevention Act, or those preventing ex-offenders from being in areas designated as "high crime" or where "controlled substances are illegally sold, used, distributed, or administered" means that many ex-offenders are in violation of their parole simply by going home, where the majority in their neighborhood, including family members, have criminal records, and drugs are sold on almost every corner.

I cannot begin to recount all the men I met, particularly those with prior records or those on parole, who were re-incarcerated for crimes they did not commit, simply because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong people. Not possible! Our system is just!

True, it is for those who can afford justice in the form of a bond and a private lawyer, or for those against whom the system is not already unduly prejudiced. But in a system with corrupt cops eager for arrests, zealous state attorneys eager for convictions, jaded and overwhelmed public defenders eager for quick pleas, and rigid bond judges eager to set bail far beyond what anyone in the defendant's socio-economic class could reasonably afford, there is little opportunity for a fair trial.

For so many, including myself, the conditions in the penitentiary were preferable to those in Cook County Jail -- where some 30,000 detainees languish awaiting the resolution of their cases -- so a quick plea is the lesser of all evils and the shortest route to freedom. Had I chosen to fight my case, there is little doubt I would still be there today. In the end, what does that say about our criminal justice system?


Digg!

Charles Shaw, a writer and activist, is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Newtopia Magazine. He is writing a series on his recent prison experience.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"Americans have forgotten this war"
Posted by: WhatNow? on Sep 28, 2005 3:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't. I have lost touch a some with the statistics related to the war on amerikan users. It is worse than I knew.

If amerika had not acquiesced to the war on drugs, we might not have gotten this even greater unamerican war on terror.

Some people like to mention our "government" likes supporting social darwinism. I wish they would in some instances. The drug war is not social darwinism. It is oppressive more like nazi germany or a stalinistic ussr. Corporate welfare is also not social darwinism. They are not leaving people to fend for themselves. They are oppressing the poorer and less able to defend themselves while protecting and supporting the richest and most able to fend for themselves.

The drug war made me realize sadly that the US does not believe in or practice the ideals written in the Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence.

What is so great about our "freedom" when I can not even grow hemp to use the seeds for food?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is BS!!!
Posted by: expat in tokyo on Sep 28, 2005 4:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok I have posted many replies to many news articles,yet NONE have moved me to type as this one has. First let me start.. Chris you were a short timer and probably not even in a Prison. You were more likely in a Jail. Big difference.
Let me first state my credentials.... From March 25 1997 to April 17 2002 I was imprisoned for my stupid thoughtless youth. I robbed a bank in Vermont when I was 18 years old and I was sentenced to Federal Prison. The worst of the worst, I did my time in USP Lewisberg in Pensylvania also known as the origional "Big House" There I saw many things.. people getting killed.. people having access to drugs. Whatever.

But there IS support for those who wish to study and work towards a future instead of lifting weights and playing cards as Im sure Chris you saw just about everyone doing every SINGLE day.
Me I didnt want to end up a statistic and I studied my ass off and first got my GED, then I worked towards my Associates degree(which I didnt get to complete until my release). Then when I was released I ignored all my ex friends who while i was inside never heard from and started looking for work. I studied and worked and left crappy jobs for better ones. Now I live in Tokyo with myJapanese wife, I teach english making around 2500 a month and am looking forward to my first child in February.
Chris dont BS these people with this.

Either you didnt pay attention inside, or with your ideals looked at things with rose colored glasses. Those that are inside LIKE "the life" of partying and gang banging and doing anything other than studying working for something. Those who decide to not become a statistic have support.

I had a friend inside who killed a cop in 1967 in Chicago and I used to play chess with him every day. He told me before I left... dont be like me... dont be a 68 year old man rotting his life behind the wall... and for all that he taught me(which I dont have the time to write) I owed him that. I only wish he could see me now.
Anyone who believes this BS.. go volunteer at a prison.. see what most of the people in there do.. and help someone who really wants to change.
Michael R. Hoctor
US BOP REG # 04141-082
AKA... EXPAT IN TOKYO

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» two corrections Posted by: expat in tokyo
» RE: This is BS!!! Posted by: lizzieg
» RE: This is BS!!! Posted by: expat in tokyo
» Thank you Posted by: La Femme Nikita
» RE: This is BS!!! Posted by: Lizka
A national disgrace
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 28, 2005 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We will have difficulty building jails fast enough to house criminals as long as drug use is illlegal. Drugs should be controlled in the same way that alcohol is. If crimes are committed to obtain drugs, they should be prosecuted in the same way as a liquor store holdup or robbery. If crimes are committed while under the influence prosecute them the same way as drunk driving. If drugs are smuggled into the country or produced outside the controlled system, that should be prosecuted the same way as bootlegging. Sales to minors also prosecuted the same way. This is a cheaper and better course.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Sep 28, 2005 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"No matter how much money the government pours into the "war on drugs," it doesn't appear to make a dent in drug use or drug-related crime."
And that is because as long as there is demand there will be suppliers.

Shamans of indigenous cultures understand that certain chemical substances open up those pathways/windows in our brains that are also accessed by deep meditation.
Drug abuse in indigenous cultures is unheard of because the chemical substances are only ingested as a part of their religous ritual.

We all seek to 'get back into The Garden,' and chemicals can give us a glimpse but not the real article.

Life is continuous struggle to balance our physical, spiritual and intellectual natures and to learn to become fully human.

What we need are COMPASSIONATE drug laws and perhaps 'shamans' in the prison system that can teach alternatives to chemicals, such as deep meditation.

www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: agitator church and state Posted by: bornxeyed
Drug Morality
Posted by: Colin on Sep 28, 2005 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a point I know I've made before and an argument that applies as equally to the abortion debate currently going on around another article on todays Alternet.

As with abortion, the question should be: What right do I, either as an individual or as part of a collective, have to demand that another person conforms to my idea of 'right'. Clearly the only moral answer is: None, on the proviso that in another person living their life, they do not impact on mine.

As pointed out in the article, Charles's crime was victimless. It should be up to every grown person what they do with their own body. To demand that drugs are illegal because of the say so of anything but an absolute (100%) majority is to demand that at least one person surrenders ultimate control of their body to another person else against their will. I would love to read the counter-argument to such thinking but, funnily enough, I still haven't found one.

The war on drugs is a war on choice by another name. That is why it has failed so far and why it will continue to do so, over and over again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» With pot, yes, but meth? Posted by: CrystalD
» I agree with you Colin, legalize it Posted by: La Femme Nikita
» Meth -- the manufactured menace Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» Excellent comment Colin Posted by: La Femme Nikita
Rehab and restitution, not prison
Posted by: CrystalD on Sep 28, 2005 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, honestly, I'd never heard of a white, educated person going to jail before unless it was for embezzlement or some such! I thought that most people in Charles' position were able to get off with some kind of probation or rehab. But I guess not. It is apparent that Charles learned a lot in prison that most middle-class whites do not.

And there, I think, is the key as to why the "war on drugs" still exists and why so many people get thrown into jail when they are really innocent. The upper-middle-class white people who enact the laws and vote for them think that "There's no way me or my loved ones could ever be arrested or thrown into jail, so draconian laws and sentences are not my concern. They won't affect ME." If the sons and daughters of white politicians were all of a sudden facing prison time, you can bet there would be backpedaling in the War on Drugs.

I think pot ought to be legalized, with restrictions on age of use and driving while stoned, just as alcohol is restricted. Meth and heroin are dangerous, and really ought to remain illegal because they are so destructive, but rehab and restitution would be better deterrents and cures for addicts than simply throwing them in jail.

Some crimes really do deserve imprisonment - rape and murder, for instance. But many more minor crimes could be taken care of in the community. Rehabilitation, restitution and community service would work far better than prison. How is prison going to get someone to see the error of their ways? Mostly it just produces more hardened criminals. But a rehab and restitution program that instils genuine remorse would work differently. I believe some Native American nations operate under a rehab/restitution justice system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» where are you coming from? Posted by: montana freeman
THis prohibition wont stop unless everyone gerts out there and protests
Posted by: cobrajet on Sep 28, 2005 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THe govt thinks the majority approves of its drug war, but that fact is not entireley true anymore. There is a growing majority that is educated about drug use, and know that the govt is using fear and lies to keep its agenda. The people need to call their senators, their State reps, and also arrange rallies to stop this nonsense prohibition. IT is a victimless issue, it is not even a crime. IF the govt would stop trying to legislate substances, then society could make choices, and suffer the consequences. But to prohibit harless substances is truly a fear factor intended to control people and collect revenue. ITs time for us to take a stand for our rights, end this war on drugs, since it is really a war on people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But what will it take????? Posted by: Newtopia
» RE: But what will it take????? Posted by: bornxeyed
» Prohibition cobrajet Posted by: La Femme Nikita
war on humanity
Posted by: chrstof on Sep 28, 2005 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
like lots of these other 'wars' our government has declared, the war on drugs is hugely profitable for a small group of people. they claim it's about morality, and protecting our citizens.
the number of prisons, the size of the prison industry, has grown right along with the war on drugs(twod). it's big business, big money.

the author is correct in pointing out how much money and manpower is tied up in something that continually costs more to the taxpayer, but does not produce results commensurately.
you want fewer kids getting involved in drugs? i do.

let's use some of that money to make our educational system the best in the world. there used to be all sorts of extracirricular activities for kids to do. school districts and parents can't afford them anymore. parents have to work multiple jobs just to get by, taking the time they should have to raise their kids.

poverty will only increase as we let the rich off the hook and continue subsidizing their greed.
how about jobs? it is generally accepted that the illegal immigration problem is because they will do jobs we won't. that's a lie! since our gov't has turned it's collective back on the working person, many jobs do not pay enough to make a decent living- to save, to have health care, to live w/out debt, to send your kids to college, etc.

drug use is normal. for years we favored alcohol and tobacco. they have always been legal. and profitable. when alcohol did get outlawed, the mureder rate, and other crime rates, went thru the roof. that was about 75 yrs ago, and we have forgotten that fact.

further, all drug laws were initially passed as a reaction to non-whites using. fears of blacks raping white women gave birth to laws re: cocaine and heroin. pot was outlawed initially to control the influx of mexicans into the southwest, again to 'protect the virtue' of our white daughters and wives. it was then made even more illegal than the truly dangerous drugs by the nixon admin. to exert control over the youth who posed a very real political threat to his white house.

what better way to get a grip on rioting blacks and hippies?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cont.
Posted by: chrstof on Sep 28, 2005 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how is a bloated legal system, caging people faster than you can build kennels for them, and infringing on individuals rights a better choice than: educating the youth about substances, educating all people to enable greater economic opportunity, providing a social safety net to help those with other problems that use/abuse drugs to self-medicate rather than getting proper help, and ending this 'the police are the enemy' (propelled mainly by twod) mentality so pervasive in our culture?

the sad fact is that twod is a means of political control. all our resources are spent institutionalising the poor, the minorities, the fringes of society.

seems like that money would be better spent on going after terrorist cells, buying the fbi a computer system that actually works, planning for mass evacuations and emergency preparedness, and most of all- education for all americans. this won't eliminate the 'drug problem'. nothing will. it's human nature to alter one's consciusness, from a child spinning until she's too dizzy to stand, to the executive who has a cocktail, to those that recreationally indulge in sex, or gambling, or watching movies, or bungee jumping, or church.... the list is endless. it's not drug use that's the problem, it's the manner a person uses drugs.

we can much less expensively deal with the relatively small number of people that use drugs in a way that causes the rest of us grief. let's free up the police and the courts for child molesters, muderers, rapists, and the burgeoning number of corporate criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Driving kills more people per year than all drugs put together, including alcohol & tobacco
Posted by: Newtopia on Sep 28, 2005 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On average over one million people are killed annually—and another 50 million injured—in traffic accidents around the world. In the United States, traffic accidents remain the leading cause of death for Americans under the age of 35. Speeding is breaking the law, yet everyone does it. Driving is a choice we make, like ingesting drugs, but the government doesn't make it illegal despite its overwhelming danger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Race & Class in the drug war
Posted by: Newtopia on Sep 28, 2005 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Middle class white people are beginning to be sent to prison for a number of (openly acknowledged) reasons which include the fact that the system itself and the profits it generates are so unfathomably huge now that they want as many people as they can get inside prisons and they don't care where they get them. But, they also are fully aware of the racial and socio-economic disparities. In June of 2000, Human Rights Watch published a study of racial disparities in the “War on Drugs” in which they stated chillingly:

“The racially disproportionate nature of the “War on Drugs” is not just devastating to Black Americans. It contradicts faith in the principles of justice and equal protection of the laws that should be the bedrock of any constitutional democracy; it exposes and deepens the racial fault lines that continue to weaken the country and belies its promise as a land of equal opportunity; and it undermines faith among all races in the fairness and efficacy of the criminal justice system.”

Thus, there is a lot of pressure within the court systems to arrest and incarcerate white people in higher economic classes in order to mitigate the growing awareness and discontent about these racial disparities.

But one only has to go back to the late 60s to see how the establishment reacted to white middle class kids being thrown in prison for Draconian drug laws. Until Nixon Federalized drug laws and created the drug schedule in 1970, white middle class kids caught with a small amount of marijuana were getting 10 and 20 year sentences under certain state laws. The political pressure was untenable. It may be the only thing to change these laws, because its only when the affluent are inconvenienced that laws and social values change.

For more, check out "The Vice Lords of the Replacement Economies" from the Guerrilla News Network.

- Charles

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cixous
Posted by: Moonbat on Sep 28, 2005 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bizarre thing about this is that the uselessness of the drug war is something liberals and conservitives actually agree on.

Can it be that we are so entrenched on our other skirmishes in the culture war that we can't take time out to come together and dispense with this drain on society and resources?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Both sides have merit
Posted by: Dio on Sep 28, 2005 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a white middle class ex-convict (state prison time), I can say that both sides of this argument have merit.


In many state prison systems... if a convict betters himself... it is in SPITE of the system... not because of it.


For instance. IF education beyond GED is available... it comes with a price tag. One must often do education on top of hard labor. Which at first glance seems like no big deal (I have worked full time and been a student in the free world)... until you consider that studying in a place with zero privacy and zero quiet space is not easy. Try studying after a day of hard labor in the field and evening classes surrounded by a zoo. Life in prison is hard enough. Life in prison trying to be a student is MUCH worse.

Add to that the culture of prison. It starts with the gaurds (this is an issue SPECIFIC to state prisons. Federal prisons have rules regarding respect towards inmates.) One is treated as a subhuman from gitgo. Being treated as less than human for every waking moment has an effect on the human mind. Then add all the people there for victimless crimes... and you see where it goes. Those who were essentially non-criminal outside of breaking a law with no victim... are now in the college of criminals learning that authority does not respect them... so why should they respect authority? The system CREATES real criminals out of pot smokers.

Now, for the flip side. There ARE MANY prisoners who have no hope. They see no point in any form of education. They don't WANT to learn. And if they COULD be convinced that it mattered... their daily life goes from bad to worse. They have no concept of delayed gratification (a common problem for people born into the working class according to Sociology 101)

So, in short... both sides have a point.


Our system uses the word rehabilitation only as PR for the public. While educational programs are often available (but not always), they make it so unappealing (there is not enough room to describe the ways in which they do so) that those who do enroll... do so in spite of the system. And at the same time... many would not bother unless they got something for it NOW.

I managed to get a Bachelor's degree, get out, and go on with a relativey normal productive life... but I feel it is in SPITE of the system simply because I REFUSED to kow-tow to the system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Both sides have merit Posted by: Newtopia
I totally agree
Posted by: janvdb on Sep 28, 2005 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article about an important topic -- The Criminal Injustice System.

The "war on drugs" is designed to provide human fodder to the giant maw of prisons-for-profit, which is shredding the lives of not just blacks, but of all the lower classes.

It feeds on itself. It self-perpetuates itself. It creates and feeds the criminality, so it will have its necessary food.

We need to start selling marijuana just like we sell vodka. License growers just like we license breweries and distilleries. License liquor stores to devote a counter to marijuana. Tax it. Use the tax money to FINALLY provide treatment-on-demand for alcoholism and addiction. Use modern orthomolecular, nutritional, amino-acid supplement methods of treatment.

We need to make heroin available by prescription to people diagnosed by doctors as addicts.

We need to start simply ignoring the production, importation, sale and possession of the other drugs. The prices will collapse and use will increase only marginally. When the prices collapse, the profits of the criminal empires now threatening the governments of Mexico, Columbia and Afghanistan will implode. Stability will become possible in these places.

Mexico is overtaking Columbia as a producer and conduit of drugs. That criminal underground has taken over the government of thousands of local towns, the state of Chihuahua and, at times, the national government of Mexico. Corruption fueled by drug money is smothering the legitimate economy in Mexico, sending millions over the borders to push down wages and erode working conditions at the bottom end of our labor market.

We are threatened by chaos at our southern border due to our drug policies.

We need to study what Europe is doing and modernize our drug policies.

Prisons for profit should be stopped. These should be nationalized with some reasonable payment to the corporations in this business.

We need to fund public defenders offices adequately and also make DAs and public defenders LIABLE for suppressing evidence, lying in plea bargainings and other misbehavior.

We need to stop the policy of reducing sentences to charged informants in return for "ratting." This rewards lies and incarcerates innocents.

The thing is broken. FIX IT!!

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Apology for the BS comment
Posted by: expat in tokyo on Sep 28, 2005 6:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After re-reading the article and reading many of the comments I wanted to apologize to Charles for attacking his article. I still believe that people have to want to change in order for the system to work, but I think your premis is correct.

The prison industrial complex is a huge money maker and employer of ex-US soldiers and people who otherwise would be in prison. God if I had a dime for every guard who told me.."you dont know how close i was to being where you are" and at the same time verbally and physically abusing prisoners.

In regards to someone commenting on Federal guards having laws to treat prisoners humanely dont make me laugh. I was in the holeI(solitary) for making home made wine inside(usually from fruit juice) and I was yelling at a guard because he threw my trey in through the slot and my food spilled all over the floor. Well i made enough noice alright. They brought in the SORT team.. which kinda like the SWAT team but for prisons... and "cleared my cell" how you ask?? They threw a "non lethal bang grenade" which exlpodes with deafening noice(inside a 8 by 10 concrete cell you can imagine the effect on the ears) and shoots tiny rubber balls throughout the cell.. then the stripped me of my clothes and took my bedding and left me in there chained and shackled for 10 hours for me to "calm down" all because my food got thrown by a guard on the floor and I stood up for it. Real humane. If you try to report it they laugh at you and noone believes you.

Charles thank you for putting this article out and bringing some realization to the folks who have no idea what goes on behind those cold walls.
And again sorry about screwing your name up earlier.LOL.
Everyone should check out his website for news, blogging, and great articles.
NEWTOPIA MAGAZINE
Its great stuff

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thank you for the apology Posted by: La Femme Nikita
» RE: Apology for the BS comment Posted by: stoney13
Nice job
Posted by: Kneel on Sep 28, 2005 6:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are a few different issues here.

One is the incredible racism of the criminal justice system. Blacks are more likely to be stopped; if stopped, searched; if searched, arrested; if arrested, charged; if charged, convicted; if convicted, sentenced harshly... It's incredible that this goes on and on with so little opposition.

Also there's drug related violence, health problems and deaths, which actually go up under stronger enforcement.

What's scary to me, though, is the people who think this drug should be legal (usually marijuana) but not some other drugs. By that standard, alcohol and tobacco should definitely be illegal.

Anyway, drug legalization and our incredible incarceration rate, and the racial makeup thereof, should be high priorities for progressives. (Sadly, the Dems, wanting to appear "tough" so as to appeal to some "swing voters" can't seem to be bothered.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All drugs should be legal and regulated and taxed by the governement is my dad's point of view
Posted by: La Femme Nikita on Oct 1, 2005 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And in looking at my own alcoholism, I think he is right. Nothing thus far has worked. Not in my dad's life time. And I do advocate for recovery, for 12 step recovery. I am done pointing the finger. I am looking in the mirror now. Addiction is sickening, I can see it in my self, it is a sickness. Addiction is a disease. Are we fighting a war on disease? A war on sickness? A war on addiction? Do you fight a war on cancer? influenza? heart disease.

I think my dad has the right point of view. I really do. Yes, I can change my mind. I never really solidified a position. No, I personally do not and will not break the law to use an illegal substance. This does not mean I do not think the law should be changed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please sign my petition to stop random drug test
Posted by: allenvw on Jun 9, 2006 9:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with everyone here. The rights are for all the people and not just for the policiticans. Our Fourth is gone, The next thing they take away will be our second ammendment.

http://allenvw.tripod.com/the_petition.html

Here is the link right to the petitions.

Stop random drug test on saftey sentitive occupation workers
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/153113207

Make law enforcement and politicians take Random drug test.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/430175089

Thank you all and GOD BLESS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]