Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Purging the Poor from New Orleans

By Naomi Klein, The Nation. Posted September 27, 2005.


Developers angling for New Orleans contracts dream of a new, whiter city in the hurricane's wake.
Advertisement

Outside the 2,000-bed temporary shelter in Baton Rouge's River Center, a Church of Scientology band is performing a version of Bill Withers's classic "Use Me" -- a refreshingly honest choice. "If it feels this good getting used," the Scientology singer belts out, "just keep on using me until you use me up."

Ten-year-old Nyler, lying face down on a massage table, has pretty much the same attitude. She is not quite sure why the nice lady in the yellow SCIENTOLOGY VOLUNTEER MINISTER T-shirt wants to rub her back, but "it feels so good," she tells me, so who really cares? I ask Nyler if this is her first massage. "Assist!" hisses the volunteer minister, correcting my Scientology lingo. Nyler shakes her head no; since fleeing New Orleans after a tree fell on her house, she has visited this tent many times, becoming something of an assist-aholic. "I have nerves," she explains in a blissed-out massage voice. "I have what you call nervousness."

Wearing a donated pink T-shirt with an age-inappropriate slogan ("It's the hidden little Tiki spot where the island boys are hot, hot, hot"), Nyler tells me what she is nervous about. "I think New Orleans might not ever get fixed back." "Why not?" I ask, a little surprised to be discussing reconstruction politics with a preteen in pigtails. "Because the people who know how to fix broken houses are all gone."

I don't have the heart to tell Nyler that I suspect she is on to something; that many of the African-American workers from her neighborhood may never be welcomed back to rebuild their city. An hour earlier I had interviewed New Orleans' top corporate lobbyist, Mark Drennen. As president and CEO of Greater New Orleans Inc., Drennen was in an expansive mood, pumped up by signs from Washington that the corporations he represents -- everything from Chevron to Liberty Bank to Coca-Cola -- were about to receive a package of tax breaks, subsidies and relaxed regulations so generous it would make the job of a lobbyist virtually obsolete.

Listening to Drennen enthuse about the opportunities opened up by the storm, I was struck by his reference to African-Americans in New Orleans as "the minority community." At 67 percent of the population, they are in fact the clear majority, while whites like Drennen make up just 27 percent. It was no doubt a simple verbal slip, but I couldn't help feeling that it was also a glimpse into the desired demographics of the new-and-improved city being imagined by its white elite, one that won't have much room for Nyler or her neighbors who know how to fix houses. "I honestly don't know and I don't think anyone knows how they are going to fit in," Drennen said of the city's unemployed.

New Orleans is already displaying signs of a demographic shift so dramatic that some evacuees describe it as "ethnic cleansing." Before Mayor Ray Nagin called for a second evacuation, the people streaming back into dry areas were mostly white, while those with no homes to return to are overwhelmingly black. This, we are assured, is not a conspiracy; it's simple geography -- a reflection of the fact that wealth in New Orleans buys altitude. That means that the driest areas are the whitest (the French Quarter is 90 percent white; the Garden District, 89 percent; Audubon, 86 percent; neighboring Jefferson Parish, where people were also allowed to return, 65 percent). Some dry areas, like Algiers, did have large low-income African-American populations before the storm, but in all the billions for reconstruction, there is no budget for transportation back from the far-flung shelters where those residents ended up. So even when resettlement is permitted, many may not be able to return.

As for the hundreds of thousands of residents whose low-lying homes and housing projects were destroyed by the flood, Drennen points out that many of those neighborhoods were dysfunctional to begin with. He says the city now has an opportunity for "twenty-first-century thinking": Rather than rebuild ghettos, New Orleans should be resettled with "mixed income" housing, with rich and poor, black and white living side by side.

What Drennen doesn't say is that this kind of urban integration could happen tomorrow, on a massive scale. Roughly 70,000 of New Orleans' poorest homeless evacuees could move back to the city alongside returning white homeowners, without a single new structure being built. Take the Lower Garden District, where Drennen himself lives. It has a surprisingly high vacancy rate -- 17.4 percent, according to the 2000 Census. At that time 702 housing units stood vacant, and since the market hasn't improved and the district was barely flooded, they are presumably still there and still vacant. It's much the same in the other dry areas: With landlords preferring to board up apartments rather than lower rents, the French Quarter has been half-empty for years, with a vacancy rate of 37 percent.

The citywide numbers are staggering: In the areas that sustained only minor damage and are on the mayor's repopulation list, there are at least 11,600 empty apartments and houses. If Jefferson Parish is included, that number soars to 23,270. With three people in each unit, that means homes could be found for roughly 70,000 evacuees. With the number of permanently homeless city residents estimated at 200,000, that's a significant dent in the housing crisis. And it's doable. Democratic Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, whose Houston district includes some 150,000 Katrina evacuees, says there are ways to convert vacant apartments into affordable or free housing. After passing an ordinance, cities could issue Section 8 certificates, covering rent until evacuees find jobs. Jackson Lee says she plans to introduce legislation that will call for federal funds to be spent on precisely such rental vouchers. "If opportunity exists to create viable housing options," she says, "they should be explored."


Digg!

Naomi Klein is the author of "No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies" and "Fences and Windows: Dispatches From the Front Lines of the Globalization Debate."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
adp3d
Posted by: adp3d on Sep 27, 2005 4:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I were dictator of the United States I would nationalize all companies and corporations receiving no bid contracts, paying the workers and executives fair wages and return the tremendous profits to the national treasury...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did anyone expect less?
Posted by: poonoggin on Sep 27, 2005 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After stealing every dollar within a thousand miles of their grasp the Bushzi Mafia of CEO's and Religious Preachers have figured out a way to steal a whole city.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Fallacy of the Free Market System
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Sep 27, 2005 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Naomi Klein pinpoints the underlying principle in rebuilding areas damaged by Katrina, namely the free market system. The free market system is the guiding principle of neoliberalism because in its current framework, it distributes more wealth to the rich and less to the poor. That is exactly what Naomi Klein is talking about in her article.

It has been shown to date both theoretically and emperically that a captialistic model distributes wealth more efficiently than a centralized model. They both have drawbacks. In the centralized model, central planners make all economic decisions without any knowledge of the market. In the capitalistic system, without sufficient government intervention, wealth is distributed very unfairly.

The neoliberal model of capitalism minimizes government interventions that would interfere with the unfettered accumulation of wealth. Of course those interventions such as tax breaks, subsidies and other incentives that promote the accumulation of wealth are therefore considered to be vital in the free market economy.

Without government funding health care, education, a welfare system, daycare and a housing system, the disadvantsged in society would remain exactly that. Compassionate government funding can virtually eliminate poverty. Even Adam Smith, the founder of free market principles, believed that self-interest alone was not sufficient to guarrantee fairness in an economic system as articulted in his book "Theory of Moral Sentiments".

The Bush administration justifies its actions on the basis of ownership, self-reliance and the free market which become a pretext for enriching the rich and empoverishing the poor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What class war?
Posted by: guess on Sep 27, 2005 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember that the criminals currently in power have had Section 8 vouchers on the chopping block for years along with every other social program. If you have limited means and little opportunity to pull yourself up by the "bootstraps",that's just your tough luck. Must be a character flaw according to the wealthy privileged thieves.

From this moment forward,I will only donate to local community groups working for the common good of their fellow residents. No more Red Cross which has been working in coordination with the Southern Baptist Convention since 1987 and is now handing out motel vouchers regardless of actual financial need. Let the rich take care of themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad, but true
Posted by: also aswell on Sep 27, 2005 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some things never change...

I live in the same voting district that David Duke once called home. I've been home over a week and hear almost the same things from my neighbors as before the storm. Typical "n" word things like maybe we'll be lucky and none of the N's will come back.

But there is an almost humorous twist. The conversations invaridable go to jobs that are going unfilled. And complaints about trash collection, which cannot find enough workers. Maybe they will be lucky and get to do the trash hawling themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You are Overreacting and Exaggerating
Posted by: johnny-boy3 on Sep 27, 2005 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reconstruction of the city is inevitable. Why are you so threatened by the prospect of cleaning up NOLA?

This happens all the time in disaster areas.

Please do not be so melodramatic. No poor folks are going to be homeless because evil developers want to erect a high-rise.

From what I've seen of reconstruction plans for the city, the rebuilding will both reasonable and responsible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What a load of crap! Posted by: Michiganman
You're forgetting about decimated middle class neighborhoods
Posted by: moogal57 on Sep 27, 2005 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a New Orleanian, I agree totally with what you said in this article. Our worst nightmare is that the "condo-ization" that was starting to occur in New Orleans will get even worse and that poor blacks, who ARE the majority in New Orleans will be displaced; homes that they rented and owned will be bought up by speculators. I think people should continue to think about each other and not just about how to fatten their wallets. CAN THE GREED for once, people!

However, one area that NO ONE has written about is the middle class section of New Orleans by the lake (the area in which I live). These were mostly homes owned by whites (but I'm glad to say that our neighborhood was mixed). Lakeview, Lake Vista, the UNO area, and a good portion of Gentilly will have to be BULLDOZED because these houses were under 6-10' of water for a long period of time. No one ever mentions this - the mayor and many of the city officials live in this area, as do many of the middle-class African-Americans in the city.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time for the Poor to Learn How to Make Bombs
Posted by: rangerjim on Sep 27, 2005 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is time to teach the oppressed poor people of this country how to make bombs and launch a campaign to overthrow the Nazi Regime of George W. Bush, (Adolf Hitler)) Dick Cheney (Rudolf Hess), Condi Rice (Heinrich Himmler) and at the same time, declare war on corporate America as well. It is high time someone did to this administration what the Italians did to Mussolini during WWII and the Romanians did to Chauchesco(not sure of spelling). This government has been turned into nothing but a cesspool of corruption and graft. They talk about graft and corruption in Louisiana. That Nazi Bush should take a look in the mirror and he will find corruption and graft up close and personal Since the electoral process is rigged to the hilt, I do not see much alternative other than armed uprising among the poor and working people to take back this country and our government, by the use of force if necessary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hope....... not here
Posted by: beemadj on Sep 27, 2005 12:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yes this all sounds good and yes it would be easy and doable to make affordable housing for all those left without by the storm. however its not gonna happen. sure some company is gonna make some big noise about helping out those in need but its all gonna be bullshit. ceos of development companies are just gonna try to put more hotels and housing that they can profit off of come mardi gras time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

misunderstood
Posted by: kittykat on Sep 27, 2005 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Barbara Bush was misunderstood when she said this 'was working very well for them' she probably meant her obnoxious,retard son and his rich,greedy land developing suck-ups and assorted cronies who are exploiting this tragedy at every turn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The New New Orleans
Posted by: drewdode on Sep 27, 2005 6:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Miss Klein when you mention the vacant properties in New Orleans you are being somewhat misleading. Most of the vacant properties in New Orleans before Katrina hit are blighted properties that were uninhabitable. You mentioned the Lower Garden District. It is an area that has been going through "Gentrification' for over 40 years and is still mostly unredeveloped. Not to be confused with The Garden District that is one of the most historic and high dollar neighborhoods.

Most of the population of the city are renters who live in Shotgun Doubles that are on 30 foot lots. Yes, large numbers of the pooer folks live in Public housing, much of which was built in the 30s and 40s and is cost prohibitive to upgrade to current code and standards. But most of the population lives in the rows upon rows of shotgun doubles.
When the areas are surveyed and it is decided that the properties cannot be restored the lots will have to be re-subdivided to current minimum lot sizes for R-1, R-2 and R-4 Codes.

The logical step for the city is to apply 2005 city planning rules to the areas that wil be redeveloped. For a developer to get the privilege of a building permitt for a new subdivision the city can demand the developer also must develop some low and middle income housing or build a new school or develop some new parks.

If it is done right some of the most flood prone neighborhoods will be redeveloped as parks and greenspace. Many of the neighborhoods that were shotgun doubles can be resubdivided to Townhomes or low rise apartment complexes.

It does not make sense to talk about rebuilding the city to 1850 standards. The city of NewOrleans and its local banks for years have offered special loan programs to assist individuals to purchase their own homes. They have had very little success because the local bureacracies that are set up to assist in these programs are ineffective. Why not let these folks get first time home buyer loans backed by the state and federal government and enjoy the benefit of home ownership rather than think about providing low cost rental housing so a landlord reaps the profit.
Sincerely,
Drewdode

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another example of "What were they THINKING ?"
Posted by: kww355 on Sep 27, 2005 8:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FEMA doesn't want to give the displaced debit cards or cash~ they want to deposit it in their checking accounts!!! Poor people don't HAVE checking accounts...Duh!

The same twisted logic is being employed in plans for the "New" New Orleans. The rich developers can't wait to bulldoze poor people's housing and build condos. They want to turn the "Big Sleazy" into a sanitized Disneyland version of it's pre-Katrina self. You betcha! Bring those tourists down by the planeload!

All righty,then. If you don't have affordable housing, where are all the chambermaids,waiters,buspersons, and salesclerks going to live ??? Will they all commute from Arkansas ???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not get these folks to invade UT, NV, CO, AZ, and NM
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 28, 2005 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And let's turn the Southwest into a cool BLUE.

P.S.: Yes, Utah and even Arizona can be tough but Howard Dean's cousin is mayor of SLC and AZ still does have some hope of Democrat inroads what with Mccain looking more like another Bush kissup and pissing off more Arizonans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kosovo on the Bayou
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Sep 30, 2005 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Naomi Klein's article was very accurate as she highlighted the relationship between natural disasters and the free market's efforts to rebuild a city (region) afterwards.
But what was most poignant was the term "ethnic cleansing."
This is what has happened to the ones whose population has scattered hitherto over the map. What was impossible to do by law was done by nature, and now many of New Orleans's Blacks and poor are nearly permanently displaced. It's like Kosovo on the Bayou.
So in their place come developers and other speculators who will certainly drive up real estate prices, redo the city in their image and envision a whiter city.
Although the water has receded, the problems haven't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]