Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Hugo Chávez Speaks

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted September 22, 2005.


In his first interview in the United States, the Venezuelan president talks about President Bush, Pat Robertson and giving cheap oil to America's poor.
Hugo Chávez Speaks
Hugo Chávez Speaks
Advertisement

Editor's Note: Democracy Now! met with Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez for his first interview in the U.S. Amy Goodman interviewed him in New York City with co-host Juan Gonzalez and Margaret Prescod of Pacifica Radio station KPFK. This is an edited version of the transcript.

Scores of world leaders have come to the United States for the United Nations summit. Among them, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez. In a speech before the world body, Chávez accused the U.S. of trying to hijack the U.N. Summit, and described the United States as a terrorist nation because it's harboring televangelist Pat Robertson who recently called for Chávez's assassination.

President Chávez also accused the United States of being behind the reported coup against him in 2002. Chávez condemned the U.S. invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and threatened to cut off oil sales to the United States.

Amy Goodman: Welcome, Mr. President, to the United States. You have come to a country whose government you have accused of trying to assassinate you. What evidence do you have of this, and of your other charge that it was involved with the attempted coup against you?

President Chávez: Thank you for the invitation to come to this show, Juan, Amy and Margaret -- and my greetings to all the people, viewers and isteners to these well-known programs. Let's talk about life, rather than death, because we are fighting for life. However there are always threats -- those who are devoted to the struggle for life, and use the truth as a flag and principles as a lifeline.

Chávez Supporters
Tens of thousands of Chávez supporters, opposed to an attempted recall in 2004, march in Caracas.

There is no doubt whatsoever that the U.S. government, led by Mr. Bush, planned and participated in a coup d'etat in Venezuela in April 2002. There are many proofs and evidence of this. There is a U.S. lady who wrote a book called the Chávez's Code, Mrs. Eva Golinger, and she is very close and there are declassified documents that she has found thanks to an effort to investigate the situation.

I have many evidences that my assassination was ordered on April the 12th, and I was ready to die. However, thank God and thanks to the Venezuelan people and thanks to the Venezuelan soldiers, this order was not accomplished. This order was given by Washington. And there are many evidences and witnesses, however I would like to talk about life and greet the U.S. people with a lot of affection, with a lot of love and with a lot of pain due to the tragedy in New Orleans and the gulf states.

We've been accompanying these states from the very beginning, and we've been watching TV and receiving reports by our ambassadors and the CITGO people from the very beginning, cooperating very humbly trying to save lives and assist the homeless. We have offered assistance, up to five million dollars, a very modest sum, but I guess it would be useful. We have offered medicine, water, and electric power plants, the same way Cuba offered doctors. So far we have not been authorized to reach the area. However, we hope the best for the poor, the poorest of these countries.

Amy Goodman: And televangelist Pat Robertson, his call for your assassination. What do you demand now, what is your response to that?

President Chávez: Well as a matter of fact, Robertson is not acting alone. He's just conveying, in a perhaps desperate manner, the thinking of those people closer to Mr. Bush. This is the voice of the most radical -- of the extreme right wing in the U.S., I am totally convinced that is the situation with Mr. Robertson. And as you can see, so far there has been no reaction by the U.S. government in this regard. There's nothing being said about these terrorist remarks that is in full breach of international law and breaches the laws of the United States.

But it's not only Mr. Robertson here. For some time, for some months, people who participated in a coup attempt in Venezuela are living here in the United States. And from TV stations in this country these people are calling for my assassination. A week ago, in another TV show, people in uniform, in fatigues, like terrorists -- Venezuelans and Americans and Cubans exiled in the United States. And a former agent of the CIA very recently said on TV that Chávez should be dead already, that Robertson is right. So this is the desire and the voice of the ultraconservative right-wing elite of the United States. They threatened Chávez. Chávez is nothing. Who is me? I'm nothing.


Digg!

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Viva el Presidente
Posted by: EJW on Sep 22, 2005 1:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can we have him here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: luisrodr
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: Colin
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: jules_siegel
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: Pepper
» Greed and Selfishness Posted by: jmarley
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: Michelle
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: EJW
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: soosano
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: EJW
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: ftorres
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: ftorres
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: sovinformburo
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: Jared
Do onto others...
Posted by: jonnypayne on Sep 22, 2005 3:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Jesus were alive today, would he applaud Mr. Chavez' effort to help America's poor or Mr. Robertson's call for the assassination of democratically elected president?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WWJD Posted by: blueneck
» RE: WWJD Posted by: drone
» RE: WWJD Posted by: iamdazey
» RE: Violence in Venezuela Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: jimrayc
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: jonnypayne
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: ftorres
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: EJW
CITGO
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 22, 2005 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You wanna make yourself heard? You wanna send a message not only to the Bush mob but to the Saudi Royal family, as well? BUY CITGO AND CITGO ONLY! It is a Venezuelan run company and, on average a tad (just a teeny weeny tiny tad, mind you) cheaper than the other companies. That'll send a message! Let's make that our goal. Boycott the rest and buy Citgo.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» POWER AT THE PUMPS, BABY!!!!!! Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: CITGO Posted by: Dak
» RE: CITGO Posted by: Pepper
» RE: CITGO Posted by: EJW
Mr. Chaves is more than I expected
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Sep 22, 2005 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm still a skeptic, sometimes the man's rhetoric is just too inflamatory and worries me.

But you have to admit that he sounds more compassionate than any of the Middle East oil tycoons. And his view on consumption is a surprise as well. For example, his take on us..."I am convinced that the U.S. people will wake up to the reality of things." That may be a stretch Mr. Chaves. Especially with a President and congress obsessed with drilling the AWAR rather than following your lead.

How is it a foreign leader whose country is an oil producer can see this, but not our leaders? It make me crazy.

In that spirit, today on the Muse, a vicious and ribald caricature of Pat Robertson

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is an interview?
Posted by: blueneck on Sep 22, 2005 5:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have seldom seen a more sycopantic interview with worse puff-ball questions. It can't even be dignified as an interview--all they did was to provide a forum for him to talk. what about his relations with unions in his own country, etc? Definitely not up to the standards I've seen Amy hold before.
Blueneck

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is an interview? Posted by: drone
» RE: This is an interview? Posted by: russianblue
» RE: This is an interview? Posted by: Pepper
» RE: This is an interview? Posted by: Wacre
» RE: This is an interview? Posted by: blueneck
» Show Me ONE President- Angel Posted by: decembrist
Oil prices - CITGO vs Walmart/Sam's Club
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 22, 2005 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny. Normally the gas prices at Walmart are lower than that of Citgo's but in the past few days, at best Walmart's prices are only a cent lower but at worst gas at Walmart/Sam's Club is 5 cents more than CITGO's. Looks like Chavez's success is starting to kick Walmart/Sam's Club ASS hard as hell. Give 'em hell, Chavez !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chavez is a demagouge...
Posted by: brunowe on Sep 22, 2005 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...albeit an elected one. To simply attribute his confrontational style of politics to US opposition to this rule, substantial though the latter is, is to ignore the fact that he tried to effect a military takeover against a democratically elected government in 1992. Democratic processes appear to have been his second choice.

Although not as bad as many people the U.S. has supported, the are good reasons for scepticism of him. Freedom House has changed its assessment of Venezuela over the last ten years from Free to Partly Free. (http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2004 /countryratings/venezuela.htm).

Chavez's move to curb opposition media and an independent judiciary are further indicators that his politics are as much ego trip as social democracy. The latter is shown in his court-packing law which not only allows him to flood the judiciary with pro-Chavez judges but to remove anyone else. Human Rights Watch cites an instance where three judges were "three judges were summarily fired after they ordered the release of people detained during anti-government protests. " (http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/01/13 /venezu9843.htm). The same report also mentions moves to intimidate the admittedly partisan opposition media and continuance of extrajudicial executions by the police.

On this last issue, as well as Venezuelan human-rights issues in general, one can also read Amnesty Int'ls reports at http://www.amnestyusa.org /news/document.do?id=F075A829FDC8DDCF80256E8C004200F9.

I'm not sure that his opposition's democratic credentials are much better but let's not sign hosannahs to this guy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chavez is a demagouge... Posted by: maxpayne
» This is deja-vu, brunowe Posted by: decembrist
» RE: This is deja-vu, brunowe Posted by: brunowe
What a dissapointing interview
Posted by: kmeyer on Sep 22, 2005 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing but softballs. I was hoping to know more about his overarching philosophies and how he has explicity dealt with opposition and adversities. I generally like his politics but this interview taught me nothing at all. Why, when you have an elected president to interview, would you do a fluff piece?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmmm...
Posted by: Ahimsa on Sep 22, 2005 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coming from Southamerica, I cannot help but be skeptical about Mr. Chavez.
I applaud what seems to be great intentions, and obviously am on the side of those that support the disposessed.
Yes, Mr. Chavez was elected democratically, but so was Mr Adolf H. Don't forget that, don't ever forget that.
Mr. Chavez is also a great propagandist, a witty speaker with plenty of charisma as well as inflamatory statements at the tip of his tongue. It's not difficult to like him on this side of the pond if you are interested in progressive politics.
I have seen demagogy and excess in my country of birth (which is Peru), reversal of policies and blatant corruption. Probably the main difference with US corruption is that the American people have the tendency to blind faith in authority; The fact is that "down there", in the primitive, underdeveloped, unfree world, institutional corruption is vox populi, everybody knows it, nobody believes the opposite.
I would be cautious about comments and opinions about Mr. Chavez. I would like to believe in his virtue, but experience has made me skeptical, maybe jaded.
I pray to god (or Gandalf) that he come through being what he says he is and does what he declares he'll do.
Watch, listen and hope, it's all I can do. The Messiah is not coming my friends, we're all human...(or hobbits)
What is interesting here is the process by which the Venezuelan People stood up for what they believed, in vast numbers, and how in the end thay prevailed, something I have yet to see in this "beacon of democracy and freedom", where our corrupt administration seems to be able to get away with anything they do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: Ahimsa
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: ZPaul
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: organik
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: blueneck
» Goin' to Texas... Posted by: decembrist
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: canuckistani
» Thank you Jayzer. Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: Doubtom
» Hitler elected? Posted by: gp
» Thank you too gp. Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Hitler elected? Posted by: ftorres
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: EJW
actions speak louder than propaganda
Posted by: canuckistani on Sep 22, 2005 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There will be propaganda for and against Chavez, even from mouthpieces we deem respectable because he is leading a revolution and the media is always counter-revolutionary. Clearly, before we chastise Chavez on what this or that news outlet or NGO is reporting we must observe what's going on within the country on the ground. The feeding the poor is true, the education programs are true, the training and loaning of doctors by Cuba is true. The reports of censoring judges may be true too. Do we know who owned the judges previously? Maybe no one, maybe someone, we don't know. But the fact that such a revolution is taking place wth practically no violence and taking of political prisoners speaks volumes about what's happening in Venezuela.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Evolution of truth!
Posted by: LeProvocateur on Sep 22, 2005 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bold = Bold
Italics = Italics

Viva HUGO!

This man like Simon Bolivar is proof that Education, and the Taxing of these so call Rich works! We are are now a Third World Country and have been for over forty years! When will the American People realize that we can not kill or invade any peoples or Nations that have not attack us! Only our Congress has the Right to Declare WAR!!! I fill like moving to the Evolution in Venezuela, because I am losing my rights here as an American! How can I E-Mail President HUGO CHAVEZ to thank him for the help by him and the people of Venezuela? WE the poor people of America for his help and Support. Thank you for your self less deeds!!! ! May God Bless him and protect him!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Evolution of truth! Posted by: tabebuia
» RE: The Evolution of truth! Posted by: Pookeye
Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator
Posted by: johnny-boy2 on Sep 22, 2005 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amnesty International has had their eyes on him for some time.

He jails folks without trial, restricts the media, and uses the military to harshly intimidate the swelling Venezualan opposition movement.

A good health care system doesn't make those facts go away folks. Chavez is a dictator and should be handled as such.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: londonleft
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: londonleft
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: Ely Whitney
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: Ely Whitney
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: russianblue1
Ignoring the trolls for common sense
Posted by: IanA on Sep 22, 2005 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the comments so far show a condescension which I might say is typical of American and western European views of Latin America. I can understand the scepticism from Ahimsa after Fujimori and the latest fiasco there. But I would suggest that part of the problem is that the situation has been made so desperate in many countries by the US’s neo-colonialist aggression and active corruption of central and south American countries.

People find one leader speaking common sense, and they expect a Messiah. I agree that the UN should be moved from NY once the US immigration starts causing difficulty to leaders of other countries coming through their territory to attend the UN General assembly.

Especially I agree that when he said “So we need a new morality, a new ethic at this point”. Here we have a socialist who leaves plenty of room for the capitalists and for criticism to continue, provided they do not try and destroy unfairly a democratically chosen path towards better social equality within his country.

A new morality and ethic, is exactly what is needed in Britain and America and many other consumption addicted, “me first” societies around the world. This world is not about how many bodies you can clime over to grab the golden ring although so many think it is. And yes, there will be a lot of displaced self righteous middle class and bourgeoisie if social justice is served, but they will have to deal with that reality too. I am amazed that people find it difficult to believe that a political leader of a South American country is honestly saying that which is so obvious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Logic Beats Emotions Hands Down
Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com on Sep 22, 2005 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
one need not approve of murder as a diplomatic tactic to view Chávez—who's recently said he'd like to govern until 2030—with a wary eye. Though he came to power thanks to the appeal of a radical anti-corruption, anti-poverty platform, Venezuela still ranks near the bottom of Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index, and poverty has risen under his rule. (As Thor Halvorssen, recent founder of the Human Rights Foundation, quipped to me this weekend: "Chávez loves the poor so much, he wants to create as many of them as he can.")

At home, Chávez has been eager to clamp down on a privately-owned media, most recently by way of a controversial media law. In an interview first published late last year pro-Chávez National Assembly member William Lara explained that the new law "neither limits nor restricts freedom of information," is in fact "a profoundly democratic law that places in the hands of Venezuelan citizens the possibility of participating in the communications message in both radio and television," shortly before clarifying that under the new rules "any insult directed at the President of the Republic, or at any other citizen, constitutes slander, injury and vilification." The organization Reporters Without Borders has chronicled a campaign of both legal harassment and threats of physical violence, often at the hands of the Círculos Bolivarianos, effectively private militia groups that Chávistas euphemistically characterize as "community groups." Those who signed a petition calling for an unsuccessful 2004 recall of Chavez have been similarly targeted, denied access to government grants, jobs, and microloans.

The Venezuelan president has also helped to undermine the rule of law by packing his country's supreme court with loyalists. A 2003 report by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights found among the country's persistent problems:

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down II
Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com on Sep 22, 2005 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the failure to enforce the new constitution, the perceived lack of independence of the branches of government, the growing concentration of power in the national executive, the impunity with which armed civilian groups and death squads conduct their activities, the tendency to confrontation and to denigrate the traditional political opposition on the part of the government, the constant attacks on journalists and the news media, the tendency to militarization of public administration through the increasingly prominent role of the armed forces, the growing radicalization of political stances in the context of widespread public discontent with the failure to meet social demands, controversies over the exercise of trade union rights, and the climate of harsh political intolerance and, in relation to the inter-American system, the repeated and persistent failure of the State to comply with precautionary measures granted by the IACHR[..]
But if thuggery begins at home, it does not end there—which is perhaps the real reason for outsiders to worry about Chávez. He has been a source of political—and probably also financial—support for Bolivian demagogue Evo Morales. His famously cozy relationship with Cuban dictator Fidel Castro has grown so close that, late last year, a law was passed granting Cuban judges and security forces jurisdiction within Venezuela. In short, Chávez trades Venezuelan petrodollars for help controlling his own population. Some fear that, should Castro die while Chávez remains in power, Venezuelan cash could help keep Cuba communist. And as fast as oil keeps pumping out of Venezuelan wells, those same petrodollars keep propaganda pumping from the largely Venezuelan-funded Telesur network.

There's also no small amount of evidence to suggest that Chávez's government has provided support—in the form of both sanctuary and materiel to the Marxist terrorist group FARC, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III
Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com on Sep 22, 2005 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question of how to handle Chávez, however, remains thorny—and not just because the U.S. imports some 15 percent of its oil from Venezuela. Robertson's controversial remarks may have ultimately done some good if they shine a spotlight on the Venezuelan president, as this Washington Post editorial suggests they have. But a too-aggressive posture could well backfire . Already, Chávez has used the Robertson flap as a pretext to suspend permits for foreign missionaries. More importantly, though, overt U.S. hostility could fuel nationalist support for Chávez by giving credence to his longstanding claims that the U.S. orchestrated the failed 2002 coup against him and harbors plans to, as Robertson so elegantly put it, "take him out." Resentment of perceived U.S. interference may have helped Chávez rebound from a pre-coup popularity slump.

Venezuelans don't seem to share their leader's vitriolic hatred of the United States. A Pew Global Attitude Survey found that Venezuelan attitudes toward the U.S. and its market system were among the most positive in the world—far more so than in, say, Western Europe. That may be why Eliézer Otaiza, who heads Venezuela's land reform program, explained in a recent interview that it was necessary to foment hatred of the United States in preparation for "war" with the hegemon to the north. Chávez clearly hopes to use conflict with the U.S. to rally support for himself as an alternative power center—both within Venezuela and throughout Latin America.

If the proper response to Chávez is far from obvious, though, the proper attitude could not be more clear. Flush with revenue bolstered by record-high oil prices and imbued with a bizarre vision of himself as a kind of Latin American Don Quixote, Chávez may be a clown—but he's a scary clown whose regional influence is deadly serious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Get A Real Argument Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Get A Real Argument Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Get A Real Argument Posted by: ftorres
» RE: Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
Move aside White House Joke!!
Posted by: ian_m64 on Sep 22, 2005 2:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything that Mr Chavez says that he is doing or has done is correct yet The Joke in the white house has only done one thing so far - gotten rid of saddam!! A society is only as strong as to how it deals with its poor and America has failed its test from the power above. the usa has failed its poor and blames the poor for failing them. I guess that is the new world order at work. The USA is soon becoming a third world country while china and africa and south america are gaining momentum as economic leaders. the rise and fall of the roman empire is upon us in the USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Move aside White House Joke!! Reply I Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Move aside White House Joke!! Reply II Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» Commerce Clause Posted by: brunowe
Re: Viva el Presidente
Posted by: ntisuzi on Sep 22, 2005 2:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Re: Viva el Presidente! Viva!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Winds of war?
Posted by: gp on Sep 22, 2005 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems like people in "progressive" AlterNet are looking for yet another country to invade.

The US have a highly selective memory: They are quick to attack and villify those foreign leaders who are not willing to bow to American interests, while cozying up to less than democratic regimes such as China and Saudi Arabia, that are a lot more amiable to the US' "vital interests" --not to mention all those brutal regimes around the world (specially in Latin America) that the US has not only propped up, but also supported militarily, politically, and financially.

Maybe the US --in their infinite wisdom and never-ending goodness-- should invade Venezuela, liberate its people in the same way they did Iraq. Unleash "Shock and Awe" on Venezuela and drop 500-lbs cluster bombs on the main urban centres. I am sure that, just like with Iraq, American marines will be received with flowers by cheering crowds. A few Venezuelans will foolishly put themselves in harm's way and die --"collateral damage" is inevitable in war. That's the price of freedom. A few more will take arms and resist the invasion and subsequent occupation, but those will be just a few "dead-enders" who will be in their "last throes" in no time. American troops will likely have to torture a few of the captured during wide-sweeping raids that net common people off the street but only to get "actionable intelligence" in order to make America safe. American troops will be, needless to say, exempt of prosecution under Venezuelan law. The US will then guide newly-fred Venezuelans in the complex maze of freedom and democracy, and help them elect a new leader who really knows what is in Venezuela's best interest. It is offensive to even suggest that this new leader will get his cue from the White House.

The US will go to these lengths and more, in order to selflessly liberate Venezuelans. The motivation for this liberation will have nothing to do with the fact that Venezuela has oil. Plenty of it. Nothing at all. In fact, the US are such good neighbours, that they will safekeep the proceeds from the sale of Venezuelan oil, and honestly account for every single last penny. Just like in Iraq.

Such is the American burden of being chosen by God to spread Democracy and Freedom throughout the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: londonleft
» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Mocking proves no point Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Mocking proves no point Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Mocking proves no point Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: IanA
» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: ftorres
Chicago Citgo / "La Villita"
Posted by: ande3 on Sep 22, 2005 4:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to Mr. Chavez the pilot plan for giving oil away to the poor is supposedly starting in Chicago. Well, I live in Chicago and haven't heard of it yet. Nor have I heard of the neighborhood he is talking about, "la Villita." I live in a predominently Latino neighborhood on Chicago's northwest side called Logan Square. I think it would be great if he were to assist with the winter heating bill. With the prices so high it will a very cold winter economically, because of the buildings we live in are not equipped to withhold heat. Now I'm I'll be able to afford the heating bills but I wonder about all the families as I look around the neighborhood.

On another note, I had no idea that Venezueal, Iran, and Iraq had so much oil in there reserves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chicago Citgo / "La Villita" Posted by: lissajayne
Here's a speech from Chavez.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Sep 22, 2005 7:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
G-15 Summit 3/1/04

I like Chavez. I think he may be a very decent man and leader. I've found little information to make me change my mind. Alot of the negative opinions in the world of Chavez seem to be coming from the very rich or their associates.

If he wrote this speech, his intelligence dwarfs our "dictator" here in the US and if he did not write it, his speech writers are much better than what we get here.

I hope he can and will continue socialist policies that will raise the standards of living for the poor and working class.

Oh, what is a saint, messiah, and god?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Venezuela, a sovereign nation
Posted by: gp on Sep 22, 2005 8:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
johnny-boy2: You may not have called into question Hugo Chávez' legitimate electoral victory. However, you said "Chavez is a corrupt dictator and should be handled as such", hence calling into question his legitimacy as a president. Hugo Chavez is not a dictator. He was elected twice in free, transparent, democratic elections.

brunowe: Every time Americans start expressing concern about a foreign government, calling the head of that administration "strongman", "dictator", and asking something be done about it, what ensues is either an illegal "low-intensity conflict" where one of the sides is funded, armed, and trained by the US (El Salvador, Nicaragua), a coup d'état where the "strongman" is replaced by another, more US-friendly regime (as the US tried in Venezuela, and did in Chile in 1973), or a flat-out invasion (Panama, Iraq).

The opinions expressed in this blog echo all that was said in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. Saddam Hussein was also another dictator "that needed to be handled". He was a "destabilising factor" in his region. He was funding and/or had ties to shady armed groups. He terrorised and oppresed his own people. Sounds familiar? Other things in common between Venezuel and Iraq: Oil and the lack of a large, cohesive military apparatus to deter an invasion. The only thing Chavez has not been accused of (yet) is having Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Since when the US is so concerned with the well being of other peoples? Since those peoples have very valuable natural resources the US covets and depends on. Hugo Chavez would not even be a topic of conversation in the US if Venezuela's main export were honey.

So, no, I do not think hearing war drums is a non-sequitur.

Venezuela's Media Law is mild compared to the USA Patriot Act. As for the other authoritarian tendencies, Chavez has not launched an invasion of another country inspite of the objections of the international community, nor has he lied and deceived his own people in order to send them to kill and die in a foreign land that posed no threat. Talk about arrogance and authoritarianism.

I do not see Chavez through rose-coloured lenses, nor do I care much for the man. But Venezuela is a free, sovereign country, and Americans should try to understand a very simple principle: Venezuela's fate and destiny are, should be, in the hands of the Venezuelan people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'shooting protesters'
Posted by: mjemirzian on Sep 22, 2005 9:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the claims about 'shooting protesters' are answered in this documentary on the failed US backed coup against Chavez in 2002. much lying, propaganda, and false flag treachery from the US govt.

http://www.chavezthefilm.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Holy Crap!
Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com on Sep 23, 2005 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What planet do you people live on? Except for a sane few, I half expect you all to be locked up in padded rooms somewhere. I mean the totally unfounded accusations, falsehoods and conspiracy theories. Where do you come up with this stuff. Seriously, some of you should have your heads examined. No joke! At least some of you need medication or something... Some of your conspiracies are straight out of Hollywood or a thriller novel at Boarders. Wow! I guess the internet must really have some dark places!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Olebiznessgeezer
Posted by: Virgilioperez on Sep 23, 2005 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have lived in Caracas and worked for a multinational there.
Chavez was considered a lightweight and a rabble rouser when he first ran for President. When he won, he upset the powers that be, by first of all, improving the lot of the military rank and file, and placing military leaders in administrative positions in his cabinet, including the national oil company. Business leaders laughed at him, because of his lack of sophistication. Yes, he manipulated the Congress to pass a new Constitution that allowed for re-elections and different presidential terms, among other changes. He wrapped himsel