Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Hugo Chávez Speaks

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted September 22, 2005.


In his first interview in the United States, the Venezuelan president talks about President Bush, Pat Robertson and giving cheap oil to America's poor.
Hugo Chávez Speaks
Hugo Chávez Speaks

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Amy Goodman

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's Note: Democracy Now! met with Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez for his first interview in the U.S. Amy Goodman interviewed him in New York City with co-host Juan Gonzalez and Margaret Prescod of Pacifica Radio station KPFK. This is an edited version of the transcript.

Scores of world leaders have come to the United States for the United Nations summit. Among them, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez. In a speech before the world body, Chávez accused the U.S. of trying to hijack the U.N. Summit, and described the United States as a terrorist nation because it's harboring televangelist Pat Robertson who recently called for Chávez's assassination.

President Chávez also accused the United States of being behind the reported coup against him in 2002. Chávez condemned the U.S. invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and threatened to cut off oil sales to the United States.

Amy Goodman: Welcome, Mr. President, to the United States. You have come to a country whose government you have accused of trying to assassinate you. What evidence do you have of this, and of your other charge that it was involved with the attempted coup against you?

President Chávez: Thank you for the invitation to come to this show, Juan, Amy and Margaret -- and my greetings to all the people, viewers and isteners to these well-known programs. Let's talk about life, rather than death, because we are fighting for life. However there are always threats -- those who are devoted to the struggle for life, and use the truth as a flag and principles as a lifeline.





Chávez Supporters
Tens of thousands of Chávez supporters, opposed to an attempted recall in 2004, march in Caracas.


There is no doubt whatsoever that the U.S. government, led by Mr. Bush, planned and participated in a coup d'etat in Venezuela in April 2002. There are many proofs and evidence of this. There is a U.S. lady who wrote a book called the Chávez's Code, Mrs. Eva Golinger, and she is very close and there are declassified documents that she has found thanks to an effort to investigate the situation.

I have many evidences that my assassination was ordered on April the 12th, and I was ready to die. However, thank God and thanks to the Venezuelan people and thanks to the Venezuelan soldiers, this order was not accomplished. This order was given by Washington. And there are many evidences and witnesses, however I would like to talk about life and greet the U.S. people with a lot of affection, with a lot of love and with a lot of pain due to the tragedy in New Orleans and the gulf states.

We've been accompanying these states from the very beginning, and we've been watching TV and receiving reports by our ambassadors and the CITGO people from the very beginning, cooperating very humbly trying to save lives and assist the homeless. We have offered assistance, up to five million dollars, a very modest sum, but I guess it would be useful. We have offered medicine, water, and electric power plants, the same way Cuba offered doctors. So far we have not been authorized to reach the area. However, we hope the best for the poor, the poorest of these countries.

Amy Goodman: And televangelist Pat Robertson, his call for your assassination. What do you demand now, what is your response to that?

President Chávez: Well as a matter of fact, Robertson is not acting alone. He's just conveying, in a perhaps desperate manner, the thinking of those people closer to Mr. Bush. This is the voice of the most radical -- of the extreme right wing in the U.S., I am totally convinced that is the situation with Mr. Robertson. And as you can see, so far there has been no reaction by the U.S. government in this regard. There's nothing being said about these terrorist remarks that is in full breach of international law and breaches the laws of the United States.

But it's not only Mr. Robertson here. For some time, for some months, people who participated in a coup attempt in Venezuela are living here in the United States. And from TV stations in this country these people are calling for my assassination. A week ago, in another TV show, people in uniform, in fatigues, like terrorists -- Venezuelans and Americans and Cubans exiled in the United States. And a former agent of the CIA very recently said on TV that Chávez should be dead already, that Robertson is right. So this is the desire and the voice of the ultraconservative right-wing elite of the United States. They threatened Chávez. Chávez is nothing. Who is me? I'm nothing.

They are threatening the world. That is serious. They invaded Iraq without any reason whatsoever. They violated international law and are ignoring the rules of the U.N. Terrorists bombard complete cities, such as Fallujah, Baghdad, innocent women and children.

Now, history is long. Hiroshima for instance -- Nagasaki, Grenada, Haiti, Panama, Santo Domingo. No...they do not represent the people of the United States. They are part of the imperialist dictatorship that the U.S. people are suffering today.

Margaret Prescod: Mr. President, on behalf of KPFK, Pacifica Radio in Southern California, welcome to the United States...Many people in the United States have been shocked at the racism they have witnessed against low-income people in New Orleans and the other gulf cities, and we wonder how Venezuelans view what has happened... How crucial do you think the defeat of all racism is to making the fundamental economic and social changes needed to save the world from the destruction of the market?

President Chávez: When we were children, we were told that we have a motherland, and that motherland was Spain. However, we have discovered later, in our lives, that as a matter of fact, we have several motherlands. And one of the greatest motherlands of all is, no doubt, Africa... Also, America is our motherland. Africa, America -- and Bolivar used to say that we are a new human race in Latin America, that we are not Europeans, or Africans, or North Americans. That we are a mixture of all of those races, and there is no doubt that Africa resounds with a pulse like a thousand drums and happiness and joy.

But, also, there's a lot of pain when you think of Africa. Yesterday, I met with the president of Mozambique, because fully aware of these roots and these realities, we have designed an agenda for Africa in Venezuela. And we have spoken to other South American leaders. Lula for instance, is fully aware of the African roots of Brazil and South America, and I want to share the African agenda with other leaders in South America, but Venezuela has also its own African agenda.

In the case of Mozambique, the life expectancy is 38 years old and going down, because AIDS is causing havoc in the population. It's terrible, it's a tragedy, it's a million Katrinas hitting this country. The president of Mozambique told me the number of orphaned children whose parents have died as a result of AIDS. The teachers are dying, the doctors are dying. That's a tragedy, and it's a disgrace, and that's why it hurts. It hurts so much to see the U.N. opening its doors to listen to speeches and speeches and more speeches, while at the same time, every year a population equivalent to Argentina today, or Colombia die of hunger, or Venezuela die of hunger, and those deaths could be avoided. Most of them are children, little girls, little boys, and most of them are in Africa.

So we need, like, a shaking of the world... If we reduced the military expenses in 10 percent of the world, we would have enough money to save millions of lives in this world.

In Venezuela, with the little resources -- few resources -- we have initiated a program to bring food to feed the poor people in Venezuela, and we are covering today 15 million people in Venezuela -- receiving this food distribution and assistance. And most of them receive this food for free, and others a percentage, they have to pay only 50 percent of the total amount for the food they eat. Of course this is possible only if the people themselves, participate and with a new awareness.

Racism is very characteristic of imperialism. Racism is very characteristic of capitalism. Katrina is -- indeed, has a lot to do with racism -- no doubt about it. Hate against me has a lot to do with racism. Because of my big mouth, because of my curly hair. And I'm so proud to have this mouth and this hair, because it's African. So we need a new morality, a new ethic at this point. And from my Christian point of view, we need a revolution of the ethic. And in the political and economic fields we need to take back the flag of socialism, in my view -- in order to be able to defeat -- with the will of the people, with the participation of the people - to beat those ominous phenomenon such as racism.

Juan Gonzalez: Mr. President, welcome. Bienvenido a los Estados Unidos. Your democratic revolution has a different aspect to it, in that you're rich in oil, and the world badly needs oil. What do you do in Latin America to use oil as a weapon to assist the poor? Can you tell us a little more about what you are offering to the communities of the United States who are also suffering from high oil prices?

President Chávez: This is the result of our awareness, that only through integration we can advance and we can progress among Latin American countries, breaking the paradigm of capitalism, of free trade, and neo-liberalism. In the year 2000, we started a cooperation program especially with the Caribbean and Central American countries, and some of the South American countries, with the Caracas Energy Accord, and there for the first time in history we included Cuba, because Cuba is considered like a country that is not part the Americas, and we think it is part of the Americas; Jamaica, Nicaragua, Grenada, many countries.




President Hugo Chávez


This mechanism includes the sale of oil and oil by-products with a discount of up to 25 percent. This discount becomes in the end a donation we give these countries, however, when the price of oil, starts increases, in the year 2000 we signed the Caracas Accord and the price at that time was 20, 25 dollars a barrel. When we realized that the prices started to increase and it goes beyond 40 and beyond 50, and I doubt very much the price is going to drop any time soon because this is part of the structural crisis, the world has to face it, it is a reality. There is a drop in the oil reserves, there is an increase in consumption and demand. The refining capacity is low.

The consumerism of the world is unbearable. The U.S. people must come to understand, how this country with only 5 percent of the world population, consumes 25 percent of the oil and the energy of the world. I mean that type of consumption is totally unbearable and this planet cannot stand it any more. When we realized that the price of oil went up beyond 50 dollars, we initiated another cooperation scheme. We have created, therefore, Petrocaribe and we are going to start with small Caribbean and Caricom countries, and the larger Antilles such as Cuba, Jamaica, and Dominican Republic.

So we're now providing, first we're ensuring the supply of oil, direct supply of oil from state to state, in order to avoid the speculation of multinationals and traders. They buy gasoline in Venezuela and then they go to a Caribbean country, and they charge double so we are selling the products to the states directly. We are not charging for freight, we assume the cost of freight.

But apart from that, this discount is not of 25 percent it goes to 40 percent of the total, and this money will be paid back in 25 years time, with 2 years of grace and 1 percent interest rates. So if you make all of the mathematical calculations, the donation percentage is almost 70 percent because it's a long term adjusted 1 percent.

So what Venezuela's doing is supplying 200,000 barrels of oil to the Caribbean and other Central American and South American countries such as Paraguay, Uruguay and smaller nations in South America. It means we are financing these sister nations that next year will reach 1.7 billion dollars a year, in 10 years is 17 billion dollars. It's a way for us to share, to share our resources with these countries.

And what about the U.S. population? Well after many meetings with the U.S. citizens, we decided to propose a scheme for poor populations and low-income populations in the U.S. We've seen that poverty in the us is growing everywhere. It's close to 11 percent poverty according to some estimates and instead of the figures you have to go deeper into it because if you see Katrina, and you saw what's happened, 100,000 people were abandoned and they are abandoned, and they're just surviving.

So here we have CITGO, this oil company. We have the CITGO company here in the United States. This is a Venezuelan company, so let's have a look at the U.S. map of the distribution area of CITGO in the U.S. We are present in 14,000 gas stations in the U.S., and here we have a different refineries, asphalt refineries, eight refineries that we have in the U.S., the plants for filling units, the third, refineries, terminals, and so on.

We want to use these infrastructures to help the poor populations. We have made some progress. We have given instructions to the president of CITGO, Felix Rodriguez. We want that up to 10 percent we refine here. We supply every day to the us 1.5 million barrels of oil, crude and product and we refine, here, close to 800,000 barrels a day refined here in the us. So we would like to take 10 percent of what we refine those products and to offer these products in several modalities to the poor populations. And the pilot project will be starting in Chicago we are already operating in Chicago.

Let's hope that there's not going to be any obstacle by the government opposed to this project being implemented, but we will be working in those poor populations. We have some allies, local partners and we have a number of communities, and we are going to donate some heating oil, because the winter is close, and for the school transportation to school, for the Mexican neighborhood which is the largest in Chicago, La Villita, is the name of this neighborhood with close to 900,000 inhabitants, and so there are other neighborhoods with Hispanics and Latinos. October, the 14th we're going to start with these pilot projects with small communities and schools, but there are other pilot projects that will start in November in Boston, and here in New York.

So different modalities, with local authorities, mayors, organized communities, religious groups. So we are very pleased to announce this. And to help just with a drop, and a grain of contribution to help these low-income populations, Blacks or Hispanics or also White population so we're just starting with this project.

Amy Goodman: Mr. President, your assessment of president Bush, of the invasion and occupation of Iraq? And do you think if it weren't Iraq, it would have been Venezuela?

President Hugo Chávez: The imperialist government of Mr. Bush planned. What is the U.S. government looking for? And the elite governing this country? They're looking for oil. This is part of the crisis that is looming in the horizon. You should know that the U.S., I already said this, 5 percent of the world population lives in this country and you consume 25 percent of the energy. That this consumption is partially rational, I am convinced that the U.S. people will wake up to the reality of things.

Yesterday morning, we were coming from the airport for instance, it was the traffic jam time, it was very packed in the highway coming from the airport here. I talked to the people in my car, looked outside, looked at the cars surrounding us. Out of a hundred cars, ninety-nine were occupied by a single person, the driver only. Cars occupying the highways, and burning fuel, how many gallons of fuel were burned yesterday morning, polluting the environment? That's the extreme of individualism. And public transportation, we don't see large buses coming from the airport here. So this is pure individualism, this is capitalism.

This planet cannot stand this model any longer. I think developed countries -- so-called developed countries should reflect upon the way of living and the waste of energy. And the government knows this. The big trans-nationals know this. The U.S. only has 20 billion barrels of oil in reserve. It seems as though there is no more oil around. Venezuela has 300 billion barrels of oil in reserves. Iraq has like 150 billion barrels of oil. Iran, close to 300 billion barrels of reserve. Oil for 200 years of course. Now, it is clear that the U.S. government wants that oil. That's why they planned, first they tried to get the Venezuelan oil and, of course the coup, they staged against us. That was an oil-motivated coup. They want to have the control over Venezuelan oil before going for the Iraq, for Iraq's oil.

They failed in Venezuela. So they went to attack Iraq. And the soldiers. And when I saw on TV how they were broadcasting in the evening news of the tanks attacking Baghdad, advancing toward Baghdad, and they said the Baghdad population were going to receive the American marines with flowers. I said, those people are nuts. They're insane.

These people have been combating for centuries. This is the Mesopotamian people. I know a little bit of the spirit of the Arab countries. Those are warriors, ten times more warriors than we are. They've been struggling in war for many centuries. They're going to receive, not with flowers, they're going to resist the occupation. That's the reality we are facing today.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Viva el Presidente
Posted by: EJW on Sep 22, 2005 1:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can we have him here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: luisrodr
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: Colin
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: jules_siegel
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: Pepper
» Greed and Selfishness Posted by: jmarley
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: Michelle
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: EJW
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: soosano
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: EJW
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: ftorres
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: ftorres
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: sovinformburo
» RE: Viva el Presidente Posted by: Jared
Do onto others...
Posted by: jonnypayne on Sep 22, 2005 3:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Jesus were alive today, would he applaud Mr. Chavez' effort to help America's poor or Mr. Robertson's call for the assassination of democratically elected president?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WWJD Posted by: blueneck
» RE: WWJD Posted by: drone
» RE: WWJD Posted by: iamdazey
» RE: Violence in Venezuela Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: jimrayc
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: jonnypayne
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: blueneck
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: ftorres
» RE: Do onto others... Posted by: EJW
CITGO
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 22, 2005 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You wanna make yourself heard? You wanna send a message not only to the Bush mob but to the Saudi Royal family, as well? BUY CITGO AND CITGO ONLY! It is a Venezuelan run company and, on average a tad (just a teeny weeny tiny tad, mind you) cheaper than the other companies. That'll send a message! Let's make that our goal. Boycott the rest and buy Citgo.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» POWER AT THE PUMPS, BABY!!!!!! Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: CITGO Posted by: Dak
» RE: CITGO Posted by: Pepper
» RE: CITGO Posted by: EJW
Mr. Chaves is more than I expected
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Sep 22, 2005 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm still a skeptic, sometimes the man's rhetoric is just too inflamatory and worries me.

But you have to admit that he sounds more compassionate than any of the Middle East oil tycoons. And his view on consumption is a surprise as well. For example, his take on us..."I am convinced that the U.S. people will wake up to the reality of things." That may be a stretch Mr. Chaves. Especially with a President and congress obsessed with drilling the AWAR rather than following your lead.

How is it a foreign leader whose country is an oil producer can see this, but not our leaders? It make me crazy.

In that spirit, today on the Muse, a vicious and ribald caricature of Pat Robertson

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is an interview?
Posted by: blueneck on Sep 22, 2005 5:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have seldom seen a more sycopantic interview with worse puff-ball questions. It can't even be dignified as an interview--all they did was to provide a forum for him to talk. what about his relations with unions in his own country, etc? Definitely not up to the standards I've seen Amy hold before.
Blueneck

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is an interview? Posted by: drone
» RE: This is an interview? Posted by: russianblue
» RE: This is an interview? Posted by: Pepper
» RE: This is an interview? Posted by: Wacre
» RE: This is an interview? Posted by: blueneck
» Show Me ONE President- Angel Posted by: decembrist
Oil prices - CITGO vs Walmart/Sam's Club
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 22, 2005 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny. Normally the gas prices at Walmart are lower than that of Citgo's but in the past few days, at best Walmart's prices are only a cent lower but at worst gas at Walmart/Sam's Club is 5 cents more than CITGO's. Looks like Chavez's success is starting to kick Walmart/Sam's Club ASS hard as hell. Give 'em hell, Chavez !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chavez is a demagouge...
Posted by: brunowe on Sep 22, 2005 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...albeit an elected one. To simply attribute his confrontational style of politics to US opposition to this rule, substantial though the latter is, is to ignore the fact that he tried to effect a military takeover against a democratically elected government in 1992. Democratic processes appear to have been his second choice.

Although not as bad as many people the U.S. has supported, the are good reasons for scepticism of him. Freedom House has changed its assessment of Venezuela over the last ten years from Free to Partly Free. (http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2004 /countryratings/venezuela.htm).

Chavez's move to curb opposition media and an independent judiciary are further indicators that his politics are as much ego trip as social democracy. The latter is shown in his court-packing law which not only allows him to flood the judiciary with pro-Chavez judges but to remove anyone else. Human Rights Watch cites an instance where three judges were "three judges were summarily fired after they ordered the release of people detained during anti-government protests. " (http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/01/13 /venezu9843.htm). The same report also mentions moves to intimidate the admittedly partisan opposition media and continuance of extrajudicial executions by the police.

On this last issue, as well as Venezuelan human-rights issues in general, one can also read Amnesty Int'ls reports at http://www.amnestyusa.org /news/document.do?id=F075A829FDC8DDCF80256E8C004200F9.

I'm not sure that his opposition's democratic credentials are much better but let's not sign hosannahs to this guy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chavez is a demagouge... Posted by: maxpayne
» This is deja-vu, brunowe Posted by: decembrist
» RE: This is deja-vu, brunowe Posted by: brunowe
What a dissapointing interview
Posted by: kmeyer on Sep 22, 2005 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing but softballs. I was hoping to know more about his overarching philosophies and how he has explicity dealt with opposition and adversities. I generally like his politics but this interview taught me nothing at all. Why, when you have an elected president to interview, would you do a fluff piece?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmmm...
Posted by: Ahimsa on Sep 22, 2005 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coming from Southamerica, I cannot help but be skeptical about Mr. Chavez.
I applaud what seems to be great intentions, and obviously am on the side of those that support the disposessed.
Yes, Mr. Chavez was elected democratically, but so was Mr Adolf H. Don't forget that, don't ever forget that.
Mr. Chavez is also a great propagandist, a witty speaker with plenty of charisma as well as inflamatory statements at the tip of his tongue. It's not difficult to like him on this side of the pond if you are interested in progressive politics.
I have seen demagogy and excess in my country of birth (which is Peru), reversal of policies and blatant corruption. Probably the main difference with US corruption is that the American people have the tendency to blind faith in authority; The fact is that "down there", in the primitive, underdeveloped, unfree world, institutional corruption is vox populi, everybody knows it, nobody believes the opposite.
I would be cautious about comments and opinions about Mr. Chavez. I would like to believe in his virtue, but experience has made me skeptical, maybe jaded.
I pray to god (or Gandalf) that he come through being what he says he is and does what he declares he'll do.
Watch, listen and hope, it's all I can do. The Messiah is not coming my friends, we're all human...(or hobbits)
What is interesting here is the process by which the Venezuelan People stood up for what they believed, in vast numbers, and how in the end thay prevailed, something I have yet to see in this "beacon of democracy and freedom", where our corrupt administration seems to be able to get away with anything they do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: Ahimsa
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: ZPaul
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: organik
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: blueneck
» Goin' to Texas... Posted by: decembrist
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: canuckistani
» Thank you Jayzer. Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: Doubtom
» Hitler elected? Posted by: gp
» Thank you too gp. Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Hitler elected? Posted by: ftorres
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: EJW
actions speak louder than propaganda
Posted by: canuckistani on Sep 22, 2005 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There will be propaganda for and against Chavez, even from mouthpieces we deem respectable because he is leading a revolution and the media is always counter-revolutionary. Clearly, before we chastise Chavez on what this or that news outlet or NGO is reporting we must observe what's going on within the country on the ground. The feeding the poor is true, the education programs are true, the training and loaning of doctors by Cuba is true. The reports of censoring judges may be true too. Do we know who owned the judges previously? Maybe no one, maybe someone, we don't know. But the fact that such a revolution is taking place wth practically no violence and taking of political prisoners speaks volumes about what's happening in Venezuela.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Evolution of truth!
Posted by: LeProvocateur on Sep 22, 2005 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bold = Bold
Italics = Italics

Viva HUGO!

This man like Simon Bolivar is proof that Education, and the Taxing of these so call Rich works! We are are now a Third World Country and have been for over forty years! When will the American People realize that we can not kill or invade any peoples or Nations that have not attack us! Only our Congress has the Right to Declare WAR!!! I fill like moving to the Evolution in Venezuela, because I am losing my rights here as an American! How can I E-Mail President HUGO CHAVEZ to thank him for the help by him and the people of Venezuela? WE the poor people of America for his help and Support. Thank you for your self less deeds!!! ! May God Bless him and protect him!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Evolution of truth! Posted by: tabebuia
» RE: The Evolution of truth! Posted by: Pookeye
Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator
Posted by: johnny-boy2 on Sep 22, 2005 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amnesty International has had their eyes on him for some time.

He jails folks without trial, restricts the media, and uses the military to harshly intimidate the swelling Venezualan opposition movement.

A good health care system doesn't make those facts go away folks. Chavez is a dictator and should be handled as such.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: londonleft
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: londonleft
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: Ely Whitney
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: Ely Whitney
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Chavez is a Corrupt Dictator Posted by: russianblue1
Ignoring the trolls for common sense
Posted by: IanA on Sep 22, 2005 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the comments so far show a condescension which I might say is typical of American and western European views of Latin America. I can understand the scepticism from Ahimsa after Fujimori and the latest fiasco there. But I would suggest that part of the problem is that the situation has been made so desperate in many countries by the US’s neo-colonialist aggression and active corruption of central and south American countries.

People find one leader speaking common sense, and they expect a Messiah. I agree that the UN should be moved from NY once the US immigration starts causing difficulty to leaders of other countries coming through their territory to attend the UN General assembly.

Especially I agree that when he said “So we need a new morality, a new ethic at this point”. Here we have a socialist who leaves plenty of room for the capitalists and for criticism to continue, provided they do not try and destroy unfairly a democratically chosen path towards better social equality within his country.

A new morality and ethic, is exactly what is needed in Britain and America and many other consumption addicted, “me first” societies around the world. This world is not about how many bodies you can clime over to grab the golden ring although so many think it is. And yes, there will be a lot of displaced self righteous middle class and bourgeoisie if social justice is served, but they will have to deal with that reality too. I am amazed that people find it difficult to believe that a political leader of a South American country is honestly saying that which is so obvious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Logic Beats Emotions Hands Down
Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com on Sep 22, 2005 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
one need not approve of murder as a diplomatic tactic to view Chávez—who's recently said he'd like to govern until 2030—with a wary eye. Though he came to power thanks to the appeal of a radical anti-corruption, anti-poverty platform, Venezuela still ranks near the bottom of Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index, and poverty has risen under his rule. (As Thor Halvorssen, recent founder of the Human Rights Foundation, quipped to me this weekend: "Chávez loves the poor so much, he wants to create as many of them as he can.")

At home, Chávez has been eager to clamp down on a privately-owned media, most recently by way of a controversial media law. In an interview first published late last year pro-Chávez National Assembly member William Lara explained that the new law "neither limits nor restricts freedom of information," is in fact "a profoundly democratic law that places in the hands of Venezuelan citizens the possibility of participating in the communications message in both radio and television," shortly before clarifying that under the new rules "any insult directed at the President of the Republic, or at any other citizen, constitutes slander, injury and vilification." The organization Reporters Without Borders has chronicled a campaign of both legal harassment and threats of physical violence, often at the hands of the Círculos Bolivarianos, effectively private militia groups that Chávistas euphemistically characterize as "community groups." Those who signed a petition calling for an unsuccessful 2004 recall of Chavez have been similarly targeted, denied access to government grants, jobs, and microloans.

The Venezuelan president has also helped to undermine the rule of law by packing his country's supreme court with loyalists. A 2003 report by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights found among the country's persistent problems:

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down II
Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com on Sep 22, 2005 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the failure to enforce the new constitution, the perceived lack of independence of the branches of government, the growing concentration of power in the national executive, the impunity with which armed civilian groups and death squads conduct their activities, the tendency to confrontation and to denigrate the traditional political opposition on the part of the government, the constant attacks on journalists and the news media, the tendency to militarization of public administration through the increasingly prominent role of the armed forces, the growing radicalization of political stances in the context of widespread public discontent with the failure to meet social demands, controversies over the exercise of trade union rights, and the climate of harsh political intolerance and, in relation to the inter-American system, the repeated and persistent failure of the State to comply with precautionary measures granted by the IACHR[..]
But if thuggery begins at home, it does not end there—which is perhaps the real reason for outsiders to worry about Chávez. He has been a source of political—and probably also financial—support for Bolivian demagogue Evo Morales. His famously cozy relationship with Cuban dictator Fidel Castro has grown so close that, late last year, a law was passed granting Cuban judges and security forces jurisdiction within Venezuela. In short, Chávez trades Venezuelan petrodollars for help controlling his own population. Some fear that, should Castro die while Chávez remains in power, Venezuelan cash could help keep Cuba communist. And as fast as oil keeps pumping out of Venezuelan wells, those same petrodollars keep propaganda pumping from the largely Venezuelan-funded Telesur network.

There's also no small amount of evidence to suggest that Chávez's government has provided support—in the form of both sanctuary and materiel to the Marxist terrorist group FARC, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III
Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com on Sep 22, 2005 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question of how to handle Chávez, however, remains thorny—and not just because the U.S. imports some 15 percent of its oil from Venezuela. Robertson's controversial remarks may have ultimately done some good if they shine a spotlight on the Venezuelan president, as this Washington Post editorial suggests they have. But a too-aggressive posture could well backfire . Already, Chávez has used the Robertson flap as a pretext to suspend permits for foreign missionaries. More importantly, though, overt U.S. hostility could fuel nationalist support for Chávez by giving credence to his longstanding claims that the U.S. orchestrated the failed 2002 coup against him and harbors plans to, as Robertson so elegantly put it, "take him out." Resentment of perceived U.S. interference may have helped Chávez rebound from a pre-coup popularity slump.

Venezuelans don't seem to share their leader's vitriolic hatred of the United States. A Pew Global Attitude Survey found that Venezuelan attitudes toward the U.S. and its market system were among the most positive in the world—far more so than in, say, Western Europe. That may be why Eliézer Otaiza, who heads Venezuela's land reform program, explained in a recent interview that it was necessary to foment hatred of the United States in preparation for "war" with the hegemon to the north. Chávez clearly hopes to use conflict with the U.S. to rally support for himself as an alternative power center—both within Venezuela and throughout Latin America.

If the proper response to Chávez is far from obvious, though, the proper attitude could not be more clear. Flush with revenue bolstered by record-high oil prices and imbued with a bizarre vision of himself as a kind of Latin American Don Quixote, Chávez may be a clown—but he's a scary clown whose regional influence is deadly serious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Get A Real Argument Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Get A Real Argument Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Get A Real Argument Posted by: ftorres
» RE: Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Logic Beats Emotion Hands Down III Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
Move aside White House Joke!!
Posted by: ian_m64 on Sep 22, 2005 2:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything that Mr Chavez says that he is doing or has done is correct yet The Joke in the white house has only done one thing so far - gotten rid of saddam!! A society is only as strong as to how it deals with its poor and America has failed its test from the power above. the usa has failed its poor and blames the poor for failing them. I guess that is the new world order at work. The USA is soon becoming a third world country while china and africa and south america are gaining momentum as economic leaders. the rise and fall of the roman empire is upon us in the USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Move aside White House Joke!! Reply I Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» RE: Move aside White House Joke!! Reply II Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
» Commerce Clause Posted by: brunowe
Re: Viva el Presidente
Posted by: ntisuzi on Sep 22, 2005 2:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Re: Viva el Presidente! Viva!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Winds of war?
Posted by: gp on Sep 22, 2005 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems like people in "progressive" AlterNet are looking for yet another country to invade.

The US have a highly selective memory: They are quick to attack and villify those foreign leaders who are not willing to bow to American interests, while cozying up to less than democratic regimes such as China and Saudi Arabia, that are a lot more amiable to the US' "vital interests" --not to mention all those brutal regimes around the world (specially in Latin America) that the US has not only propped up, but also supported militarily, politically, and financially.

Maybe the US --in their infinite wisdom and never-ending goodness-- should invade Venezuela, liberate its people in the same way they did Iraq. Unleash "Shock and Awe" on Venezuela and drop 500-lbs cluster bombs on the main urban centres. I am sure that, just like with Iraq, American marines will be received with flowers by cheering crowds. A few Venezuelans will foolishly put themselves in harm's way and die --"collateral damage" is inevitable in war. That's the price of freedom. A few more will take arms and resist the invasion and subsequent occupation, but those will be just a few "dead-enders" who will be in their "last throes" in no time. American troops will likely have to torture a few of the captured during wide-sweeping raids that net common people off the street but only to get "actionable intelligence" in order to make America safe. American troops will be, needless to say, exempt of prosecution under Venezuelan law. The US will then guide newly-fred Venezuelans in the complex maze of freedom and democracy, and help them elect a new leader who really knows what is in Venezuela's best interest. It is offensive to even suggest that this new leader will get his cue from the White House.

The US will go to these lengths and more, in order to selflessly liberate Venezuelans. The motivation for this liberation will have nothing to do with the fact that Venezuela has oil. Plenty of it. Nothing at all. In fact, the US are such good neighbours, that they will safekeep the proceeds from the sale of Venezuelan oil, and honestly account for every single last penny. Just like in Iraq.

Such is the American burden of being chosen by God to spread Democracy and Freedom throughout the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: londonleft
» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Mocking proves no point Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Mocking proves no point Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Mocking proves no point Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: IanA
» RE: Winds of war? Posted by: ftorres
Chicago Citgo / "La Villita"
Posted by: ande3 on Sep 22, 2005 4:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to Mr. Chavez the pilot plan for giving oil away to the poor is supposedly starting in Chicago. Well, I live in Chicago and haven't heard of it yet. Nor have I heard of the neighborhood he is talking about, "la Villita." I live in a predominently Latino neighborhood on Chicago's northwest side called Logan Square. I think it would be great if he were to assist with the winter heating bill. With the prices so high it will a very cold winter economically, because of the buildings we live in are not equipped to withhold heat. Now I'm I'll be able to afford the heating bills but I wonder about all the families as I look around the neighborhood.

On another note, I had no idea that Venezueal, Iran, and Iraq had so much oil in there reserves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chicago Citgo / "La Villita" Posted by: lissajayne
Here's a speech from Chavez.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Sep 22, 2005 7:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
G-15 Summit 3/1/04

I like Chavez. I think he may be a very decent man and leader. I've found little information to make me change my mind. Alot of the negative opinions in the world of Chavez seem to be coming from the very rich or their associates.

If he wrote this speech, his intelligence dwarfs our "dictator" here in the US and if he did not write it, his speech writers are much better than what we get here.

I hope he can and will continue socialist policies that will raise the standards of living for the poor and working class.

Oh, what is a saint, messiah, and god?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Venezuela, a sovereign nation
Posted by: gp on Sep 22, 2005 8:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
johnny-boy2: You may not have called into question Hugo Chávez' legitimate electoral victory. However, you said "Chavez is a corrupt dictator and should be handled as such", hence calling into question his legitimacy as a president. Hugo Chavez is not a dictator. He was elected twice in free, transparent, democratic elections.

brunowe: Every time Americans start expressing concern about a foreign government, calling the head of that administration "strongman", "dictator", and asking something be done about it, what ensues is either an illegal "low-intensity conflict" where one of the sides is funded, armed, and trained by the US (El Salvador, Nicaragua), a coup d'état where the "strongman" is replaced by another, more US-friendly regime (as the US tried in Venezuela, and did in Chile in 1973), or a flat-out invasion (Panama, Iraq).

The opinions expressed in this blog echo all that was said in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. Saddam Hussein was also another dictator "that needed to be handled". He was a "destabilising factor" in his region. He was funding and/or had ties to shady armed groups. He terrorised and oppresed his own people. Sounds familiar? Other things in common between Venezuel and Iraq: Oil and the lack of a large, cohesive military apparatus to deter an invasion. The only thing Chavez has not been accused of (yet) is having Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Since when the US is so concerned with the well being of other peoples? Since those peoples have very valuable natural resources the US covets and depends on. Hugo Chavez would not even be a topic of conversation in the US if Venezuela's main export were honey.

So, no, I do not think hearing war drums is a non-sequitur.

Venezuela's Media Law is mild compared to the USA Patriot Act. As for the other authoritarian tendencies, Chavez has not launched an invasion of another country inspite of the objections of the international community, nor has he lied and deceived his own people in order to send them to kill and die in a foreign land that posed no threat. Talk about arrogance and authoritarianism.

I do not see Chavez through rose-coloured lenses, nor do I care much for the man. But Venezuela is a free, sovereign country, and Americans should try to understand a very simple principle: Venezuela's fate and destiny are, should be, in the hands of the Venezuelan people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'shooting protesters'
Posted by: mjemirzian on Sep 22, 2005 9:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the claims about 'shooting protesters' are answered in this documentary on the failed US backed coup against Chavez in 2002. much lying, propaganda, and false flag treachery from the US govt.

http://www.chavezthefilm.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Holy Crap!
Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com on Sep 23, 2005 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What planet do you people live on? Except for a sane few, I half expect you all to be locked up in padded rooms somewhere. I mean the totally unfounded accusations, falsehoods and conspiracy theories. Where do you come up with this stuff. Seriously, some of you should have your heads examined. No joke! At least some of you need medication or something... Some of your conspiracies are straight out of Hollywood or a thriller novel at Boarders. Wow! I guess the internet must really have some dark places!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Olebiznessgeezer
Posted by: Virgilioperez on Sep 23, 2005 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have lived in Caracas and worked for a multinational there.
Chavez was considered a lightweight and a rabble rouser when he first ran for President. When he won, he upset the powers that be, by first of all, improving the lot of the military rank and file, and placing military leaders in administrative positions in his cabinet, including the national oil company. Business leaders laughed at him, because of his lack of sophistication. Yes, he manipulated the Congress to pass a new Constitution that allowed for re-elections and different presidential terms, among other changes. He wrapped himself under the mantle of the great Simon Bolivar the liberator of many South American countries, by changing the name of the country to the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. He has extended his hand to the poor and done a very effective job of it. He has gathered around him, very smart intelligent "out of the box" advisors that guide him in his political and economic decisions. He has started companies in the communications field, in the mining areas, in agriculture, and of course in the energy field. He has supported Castro, and is looking beyond the US for trading partners, as opposed to some other Latin American countries. It is true that he manipulates the Judicial decisions. Even referendums that he periodically sends to the people directly have been criticized of being manipulated. Rumors abound that he lives in the lap of luxury. His mother is the governor of one of the provincial states in the country, so he is not against nepotism.

But he works hard at coming up with creative ideas for the country. The middle class and the upper class were against him in the beginning, he is slowly gaining sympathizers. But he is still a lightning bolt for controversy.
If you fault him on one thing is that his rule is very personal and is not building a lasting system....One can argue that the system cannot survive without him....So, the cycle of institutional impermanence may still remain.
I think he is right on with his foreign policy. And his behavior post Robertson has been extraordinary in my mind.
He is a complex man, not adverse at corruption and dictatorial means, but he has shown to me that he means well.....and, he has been effective...go to the Economist linked text, and see the Economic tables for Venezuela better than some more advanced.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Central Control Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
RE: Central Control
Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com on Sep 23, 2005 1:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In reply to Olebiznessgeezer:
I couldn't find the economic tables following your link to the Economist. Great write up! You made some valid points. Still, Castro had good intentions for Cuba and, in effect, created a giant social system that provided a lot of people with access to schools, health care and many other basic services but because of the extremely high taxes to pay for all the programs, the economy could not grow. His solution to turn the entire nation into producing nothing but sugar cane was reckless. Not only did it destroy the national economy but it fractured the nation and people fled in droves to the US to escape the ensuing poverty. Castro stole property and forced people to grow sugar in order to become the world’s largest sugar exporter.

Central control of national production of goods and services has always had more than one weakness. To start, governments can only speculate how much of particular good is needed to meet demand. It always ends up with surpluses of some things and shortages of others because some products require various amounts of the same input. It’s extremely complex to control at best. That is why allowing individual sells and buyers through the conduit of the money has proven to be the best and most efficient means at distributing resources. Many, many cases can be cited across the globe where government ordered the production of a good only to find out there was not enough demand or vise versa. It’s extremely wasteful when central planning orders a million leather shoes to be made but only 500,000 are actually needed. The result, people go cold because that leather was not used to make much needed coats. It’s so sad to see people wrought in poverty to be used in social experiments when all along we have a system that has a proven track record of working so well. What a pity…

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We're not all evil, you know
Posted by: Webimpulse on Sep 23, 2005 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of the comments made in Chavez's interview here, as well as some of the responses to Chavez's detractors, has me thinking a very scary thought. To be frank, it's a thought that would make someone like me self-destruct.

This thought is the self-destructive thought that because of me being a white male middle-class American citizen, the beneficiary of this empire that commits murders, rapes, other atrocities against other people of the world, that I deserve no human rights, not even the right to live, and that I should just snuff myself right now and rid the world of the harm I do permanently. This hasn't escalated to a suicidal thought (not yet), but I've experienced this kind of feeling (and sometimes it has escalated to suicidal thoughts, though obviously I haven't succeeded as I'm writing this) many times before.

It's hard for me to pinpoint what specific passages in this Hugo Chavez interview or what comments afterwards have provoked this kind of feeling. My brain's too emotionally garbled to be that analytical. But what I do want to say that's clear is my kind of response to this kind of feeling that stuff like this brings up. I apologize in advance if this has little to do with the subject matter at hand of Chavez, but I just want to air this out.

Just because I was born a white male American citizen doesn't automatically make me evil. Our racism and our seeming preference for leaders like Bush isn't intrinsic to our existence - it's force-fed into us by the society at large, the media, etc. I know I live a materially comfortable lifestyle that comes at the expense of the sovereignty and livelihoods of nations the US has crushed under its heel. And I lack the willpower and resolve to shirk it. But do I condone it? Hell no. I know it's wrong. I know what's being done against Chavez is wrong. I know what Bush is doing in Iraq and Venezuela is wrong. I do what I can to resist it - and in my constantly depressed state of mind, it's very little. But it's infinitely better than nothing at all. (I certainly vote...again, not much, but it's something.) I do care, and I do want to help...even if it's not readily apparent.

I just don't want to be judged as an individual because of the evil my skin color and nationality represent. And being judged as evil because of it certainly isn't going to make me want to help any further - rather, I become paralyzed with guilt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We're not all evil, you know Posted by: Webimpulse
RE: Central Control
Posted by: Virgilioperez on Sep 23, 2005 10:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Philosophically I agree with you, bdcbryan, but there are some markets that require government intervention. For example the oil market, to me the price is not high enough to reflect the fact that, some say, we will run out in 15 years. The price should be so high now that it would make it imperative to look for alternative energies now so these can be made available to all before it is too late.

I don´t mean to imply that Chavez is doing everything right. He is speaking from both sides of his mouth...on the one hand, he chastises the US for overconsumption of energy and on the other he is subsidizing gasoline in his own country: the price of one gallon of gas in Venezuela is much less than the equivalent of one dollar....much less. This is unconsciounable to me, because it stimulates waste and pollution.

Sorry about the Economist reference: to look it up you must be subscribed. Just some data, GDP is growing 11%, industrial production is growing 6%, inflation is high almost 15%, but the trade balance is positive, and reserves are at the level of Israel, a much more developed economy. From other sources, I know that public debt is coming down. Not bad.

If you have a chance at www.economist.com click on Markets and data, then scroll down to weekly indicators--emerging markets click , then scroll down to economy and click and you will see the comparisons with a large number of developing economies.

I wish we could be growing in the US at an 11% clip, or even at a 6% clip and that the trade balance were positive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He criticizes others for the same things he himself does
Posted by: tabebuia on Sep 24, 2005 9:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I get to see him first hand in Spanish every Sunday on local TV where he talks for a MINIMUM of 4 hours. Do any of you know a single person that has so much of importance to say that it is done every sunday of the year?? this says something about his ego and state of mental health.

I would like to point out a few things about what he said in the interview. Since he came to office 6 years ago, he claims to have had at least 20 assasination attempts on his life. No one has ever been acused, much less arrested. It is a crime to conspire to kill someone but is it a crime to say that someone should be shot? I personally said for example that Pot Pol whould have been shot ----but he died a natural death. Was that a crime...Chavez seems to think so, He said Robertson should be arrested.

He offers dollars for hurricane victims ----it is only for political reasons that he does this. He still has homeless people here from the floods in 1999 that killed around 20,000 people and destroyed thousands of poor peoples homes. What about money to resolve that problem. He has used our petro dollars to help pay off Argentinas foreign debt-- and he has offered about 50,000,000 to Ecuador to help them with their debt. He is just buying their support, he does not really care about the poor. Now he offers in the press cheap gasoline to Americas poor...I will believe it when I see it. How will he put it into effect?? will he pass out ID cards to the poor? He gives promises like this every week to us here in Venezuela yet because he is always promising something new we forget about last weeks promises and they go unresolved. In his first year in office he promised to resign if in one years time there was one street child still abandoned on the streets-- we are still waiting for him to fulfill that promise --and resign!!

Where is this free food he is giving out or at least tell me where I can go and pay only 50% for the total amoun for the food I eat. This is the populist speaking--it sounds great but it simply does not exist.

Gasoline prices are $0.20 a gallon, is that good for the environment or the governments pocketbook when the oil industry is owned by the federal government? He critisizes Americans for driving one to a car but Caracas has the same huge traffic jams as any American city for just that same reason--one person to a car.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

more on Hugo
Posted by: tabebuia on Sep 24, 2005 9:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He complained about his retinue of body guards being refused visas! He had 135 people accompany him-- our oil and tax money wasted on that-- why so many when the most personel any other country sent were 41 people. Only 10 of his guys were refused visas and those because he waited until the last minute to ask for them. You do not get a US visa in 24 hours period.



Oh yes about his health care program here it is. He has had 6 years with incomefrom high oil prices to improve our public hospitals if he wanted too. Here is what we have. Last month a dozen patients died from lack of oxygen at a public hospital in Caracas. The poor must go to these government run hospitals as clinics are expensve even for us middle class. When the poor go there for help they find the hospitals empty of basics, not even gauze or syringes or sheets for the beds much less medicine. Bathrooms have colapsed and in many hopitals water is scarse. Walls and floors are dirty, roofs leak. I know one dental hygenist in the social security hospital who has not really worked for over a year because they have no airconditioning--they just go daily and sign in---and get paid for that. We have tons of doctors but chavez prefers to pay the Cuban government, for eachCuban medical personel- notice I do not write doctors- $1000 per month which is 3xs what he pays Venezuelan DOCTORS. Yes these Cubans he sends into the barrios among the poor to live and work but if the public hospitals were fixed they could go there and have real care with real doctors. Now he has passed a new law which takes away medical benifits in clinics to all public employees whose collective contracts had included this service and they will have to go to the public hospitals. this includes university personel, and state employees in the petrolium industry. Not only this but medicine is to be centralized and even private clinics have to now buy their supplies through the federal government. He is following the old communist system of tearing down all the institutes to build back what "socialism" says works.. Common folks, tell me where has that system worked in the world? Were the people of the USSR and eastern Europe living well under that system, did the Chinese under Mao have a decent lifestyle?, for some reason things have changed in these places. Even the poorest among you live far better in your capitalistic society than even lower middle class in third world contrys

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: more on Hugo Posted by: bdcbryan@hotmail.com
What Happened?
Posted by: hugh on Sep 26, 2005 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having read the Amy Goodman interview with Hugo Chavez, I was struck by her unwillingness to pursue direct answers from Chavez to her “pointed
and specific questions.

The first question Amy asked of Chavez was: Welcome, Mr. President, to the United States.
You have come to a country whose government you have accused of trying to assassinate you.
What evidence do you have of this, and of your other charge that it was involved with the attempted
coup against you?

In Response to her question Chavez offers these responces: 1-There is no doubt whatsoever that the
U.S. government, led by Mr. Bush, planned and participated in a coup d'etat in Venezuela in April 2002.
There are many proofs and evidence of this.
2-I have many evidences that my assassination was ordered on April the 12th, and I was ready to die.
3-And there are many evidences and witnesses, however I would like to talk about life and...etc.

Is this evidence?

After the response from Chavez, Amy proceeds to another question.

Amy has a reputation of being ”Hard Hitting” not “pulling punches”, reguardless of party affiliation etc. She is on a pilgrimage to TRUTH, no matter what, she is going to “get to the truth” and present it to “us”.

My question is, what happened during the Chavez interview? I wonder if she had GW on the “show”, if she would have given him a pass on answering her questions, as she did with Chavez?

What was her motivation for being so "soft" on the Venezuelan dictator?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

chavez never gives straight answers
Posted by: tabebuia on Sep 26, 2005 7:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Huge, The way chavez answered the questions is the way he always does. He always accuses but never comes up with proof. However since what he says accusingly is what the people here in Venezuela want to hear they only hear that and do not analyse the proof .....or lack there of. They go away from his lengthy speaches with their minds blurred from so many cleverly said accusations that they take them to be truths. This is part of his success, he is a great talker and any of us will be convinced of how right he is until we sit down and think about how empty his words are. He promised now to send a few million dollars to clean up the East River, he said it here on TV. This sounds so good, so generous and that is what we will remember---how he is helping his enemies people, how christian of him, how he has turned the other cheek! HOWEVER, since people have short memories and will not notice, the money, like that cheap gasoline for the poor, will not appear.

Someone said that he did not bring God into his speaches but he certainly did in this interview. He certainly does quite often in his Sunday speaches here too, yet he attacks the church right and left.

Another thing he likes to come down on is race. Venezuela is a mixed country of every color and shade. Racism as known in the USA has never existed here. Education and values and of course money are what differentiated the people. chavez is the one who is sturring up the differences by color. He is stiring up hatred where it simply did not exist.

One last comment, there is not one Venezuelan political party that is right of center. We have no right wing here and if there ever was one in the past 50 years it was so small that it was unnoticable. This talk of right wing oligarchy is false. Venezuela has some very wealthy families but unlike colombia they do not dominate and control the country. All that he says about the oligarchy is solely to stir up the masses because it is political correctfor his scheme to do this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement