Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Looking for Peace in Iraq

By Adil E. Shamoo, AlterNet. Posted September 16, 2005.


Iraqis, the U.S. public, and now members of Congress are calling for an exit strategy. It's time for President Bush to explain when U.S. troops are coming home.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Adil E. Shamoo

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

As U.S. politicians grilled Supreme Court nominee John Roberts and debated who was to blame for the poor response to hurricane Katrina, Iraq suffered its' worst day of killing since the war began. On Wednesday, at least 160 people were killed and over 570 were wounded causing chaos, confusion, and great mourning.

What's most troubling about the latest attack and the ongoing average 70 attacks per day is their nature: they largely target innocent civilians. Recently the Iraq Ministry of Interior estimated that insurgent violence has claimed the lives of 12,000 Iraqi civilians since the war began.

Nearly all Iraqis condemn these killings. There are even incidents now where some elements of the insurgency are attacking insurgents who target Iraqis.

The U.S. has been unable to quell the insurgency -- in fact, the military can't even secure a six-mile highway from the Baghdad airport to the city. Killing and jailing insurgents hasn't worked. Former Department of Defense General Jack Keane estimated two months ago that to date more than 50,000 insurgents had been killed, but that their active ranks remained between 16,000-20,000. The U.S. has shown all insurgents in the Muslim world that military power and occupation can't conquer their hearts and minds.

Recent declarations by U.S. and Iraqi officials that significant troop reductions may begin in early 2006 are welcome because they finally reflect reality -- the insurgency in its different forms can't be defeated on the military battleground. The reason is simple.

In every successful insurgency movement, you need a core group surrounded by multiple circles of support -- much as an onion has layers upon layers over its center. At the core of the insurgency are the fighters. They are surrounded by layers of support that enable them to function: people who provide or store weapons; others who provide financing and other needed supplies; and even those who allow the insurgents to hide.

Outer layers of this support are still powerful. Some people provide information to the insurgency and many others provide the psychological support to the insurgents. And there are others who provide support through their acquiescence, silence and indifference.

All of these elements create the breeding ground for a continued insurgency. And the primary cause for these layers of support is opposition to the U.S. occupation. Unfortunately, most policy makers, pundits and politicians (Republican or Democrat) don't talk about the elephant in the room: the occupation. They would rather discuss victory strategies than face the reality that Iraqis are fighting the "liberators" and occupiers.

Recently, I acted as a translator for a day to labor leaders from Iraq who were touring the United States. These courageous Iraqis spanned my native country's entire political spectrum. But they all were against the insurgents and at the same time wanted to end the occupation as soon a possible and peacefully. Moreover, over 100 members of the Iraqi parliament have signed a petition calling to end the occupation.

There are three things that could restore peace in Iraq: First, the U.S. (and the U.N. Security Council) must establish guarantees that the U.S. occupation will end. It should be made clear that it is the policy of the U.S. to leave Iraq as soon as possible. Second, the U.S. should declare that the U.S. has no intention of maintaining any permanent U.S. bases on Iraqi soil and cease building new military facilities.

Finally, the Iraqi government, U.N. agencies, and the U.S. should establish a set of benchmarks that can be used as a roadmap for getting out of Iraq and quickly. The U.S. has been forceful in pushing forth timelines for Iraqis to meet -- it is now time for the U.S. to do the same by setting their own benchmarks and timelines.

Iraqis, the U.S. public, and now even members of the U.S. Congress are calling for an exit strategy. It's time for President Bush to hear these calls and explain what the plan is and when U.S. troops will come home.

Digg!

Adil E. Shamoo, born and raised in Baghdad, is a professor at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. He is a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Follow the Money
Posted by: Sandra on Sep 16, 2005 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One has to look at who benefits from this war. The Military Industrial Complex is not likely to want an exit of troops. The Pentogon's budget has greatly increased along with their base capacity. The weapons makers are making out like bandits. Haliburton and others in the private sector are making tons of money. For all of them, this war is big business.With such close ties to the administration, their influence must be substantial. The people and the Congress can demand an exit, but there are still not enough Congressmen who are willing to push back on the administration and the Pentagon. We are going to have to get more support for this to happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Follow the Money Posted by: Captainmagic
"We Can't Wait 'Till 2008"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Sep 16, 2005 12:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Iraq insurgency is rapidly growing into a catagory-5+ black hole, and it is already sucking in an enormous amount of life and resources. Add to that the Katrina disaster, and the U.S. economy will be hard-pressed to meet its social obligations to its citizens. If we get another disaster, like a massive earthquake or Katrina-sized hurricane – a definite possibility given recent storm activity and the effects of ocean warming – the U.S. could be plunged into severe economic hardship. Katrina was a wakeup call to not spend more than we make and to be prepared for the unexpected.

It is obvious to anyone with half a brain that the time is now to withdrw from Iraq – if not for humanitarian reasons, then at least to avoid bankrupting the economy. Unfortunately, the Bush administration has destroyed good will with so many other countries, they have been so eager to act like drugstore cowboys ("you're either with us, or agann us!"), that the "Yosemite Sam" foreign policy has removed all chances of help in managing Iraq from Europe, other Middle Eastern countries, or the U.N. Nothing short of a change of administration will alter that situation. This is what has to happen – we cannot wait until 2008, "whistling past the graveyard" that somehow we'll avoid another costly calamity. Our legislators need to use the laws of our land, that they are supposed to obey as well, to impeach and prosecute BushCo for very real "high crimes and misdemeanors." Then, and only then, will we have the possibility of avoiding the abyss.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "We Can't Wait 'Till 2008" Posted by: Basenjis
Let's let Iraqis decide their own fates
Posted by: janvdb on Sep 16, 2005 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is how I think we should get out of Iraq:

Acknowledge that the country will be partitioned into a largely Kurdish north, a largely Shia south and a largely Sunni, oil-poor cental and western region. We need to acknowledge that these groups have hated each other since the Abyssid Dynasty (about 700 AD) and that they will commit atrocities upon minorities of the other ethnic groups who remain in other-dominated areas. So, people need to re-locate as quickly as possible into their home areas.

So, announce that we are getting out soon and help people move. Arabs out of Mosul, Shias out of Baghdad.

Remove all our ground troops to Kurdistan and dig in there, so the war doesn't move up there. Just guard the perimeter, with the help of the peshmurgas -- if they want us. No permanent bases. They have half the oil in Iraq and we can ship it through Turkey. Let the Kurds drive the remaining Arabs out of Mosul; we can't stop it and that is better than constant fighting and atrocities.

Set up airbases in the Shia south and provide air cover only there, if the local governments want us to. Invite in the Iranians to provide ground troops to assist the Shia protect the borders of their region. These borders would be drawn based on what the Shias think they can defend. They are religious but they have learned from bitter experience in Iran not to let the Mullahs get too much power. We can get a lot of oil out of Basra, once the fighting concentrates around Baghdad.

Let them fight it out in the center of the country, alone. The Sunnis can import the Al Qaeda and the Shias can import the Iranians. Eventually, due to sheer viciousness and ancient suicidal lust for power, I suppose the Sunni will get control of that area and slaughter whatever Shia remain there. Help them move south before this happens.

We should buy oil from the resulting states on whatever terms they wish to sell it.

Call it good and learn a good lesson -- don't think you can tip over one Sunni strongman and then easily set up another of our customary Sunni puppets while saying you are "spreading democracy." You just might screw up and actually end up with some democracy, which in a country where 60% of the population is ethnically aligned with a member of your fancied "axis of evil" might not work out the way you expected.

continued below . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Capitalism will break out within a few years, if we get our cronies out of there
Posted by: janvdb on Sep 16, 2005 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Note, please, we have exactly the same problem -- we support a Sunni government which is oppressing a majority Shia (Iran-friendly) population -- in all these countries:

Saudi Arabia
Pakistan
Egypt
Jordan

So, get ready for more of the same. Pakistan is a powder-keg. The Sunnis are already resorting to bombing Shia religious festivals there to intimidate them -- the same technique they used when they lost power in Iraq. We shouldn't waste much time on Musharif. He's living on borrowed time.

We need to get used to dealing with the Iranians and the Shias. They aren't any worse than the Sunnis we have been butt-kissing for decades so we can drive huge SUVs and Humvees around suburbia, killing the occupants of Suzukis when we have collisions and merely sneering down at them on other days.

I'm always amused at people who say we can't deal with the Iranians because that would be "bad for women's rights." Uh-huh, so then we should turn to the Saudis for guidance -- or the guys who used to run Afghanistan? That's the alternative. The Sunnis. Women are actually better off in Iran, under the Shia, than they are in Saudi Arabia, under the Sunnis, though no one will talk about that.

Overall, it's very similar to the problem we had in Latin America for years -- we supported bloody, oppressive, corrupt military dictators and whenever any "democracy" broke out, the elected governments would kick our corporations out so we would have to attack or undermine them.

We did this over and over in Latin America and now we are doing it in the Middle East.

So, learn from Cental America. After decades of "fighting communism" there, once we finally gave up, the Marxists were in control for a few years and now, my inbox is full daily with salespitches from real estate developers in Nicaraugua touting the place as "the next big thing." Cheap beach property. Retire well on a budget.

Yep.

Ditto Vietnam.

Once we get out, capitalism and progress breaks out all over the place. Real capitalism, not our preferred crony capitalism.

Ha ha

So, get out. Stay out.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What About Those Bases?
Posted by: Basenjis on Sep 16, 2005 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand we have been very busy installing military bases in Iraq that do not appear to be exactly temporary. Are we likely to just walk off and abandon these to the Iraqis? It seems to me I've heard comments from time to time about staying there for "the long haul," whatever that is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not with you anymore!
Posted by: The Butcher on Sep 19, 2005 2:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have not read the text so will be out completely.
My previous messages have been wiped out.
I am not American.
I want you to feel the urgency of what I am writing.
You used to....
America going down means the world going down,
Can you grassroot stop what your criminal admin is doing?
Can you stop Monsanto, Microsoft, Citybank, EXXON and thousands of US companies walking in and breaking the global madness?
Most of my emails were so insulting that they were wiped out.
Can you guys deal with the damage your country is wreaking?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

when I read
Posted by: The Butcher on Sep 19, 2005 2:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so many prayers
It scares the shit out of me.
Only in America do you have progressives praying. What a lot of crock?
This site scares me with with all this shit God shit.
Please keep yur beliefs to yourselves,
Fight the moron President on his evidence.
I don't fucking care who you pray for. I care about children in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Please contributors,. leave God out. This is so cheap from you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop making God a Commodity
Posted by: The Butcher on Sep 19, 2005 2:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if God exists, She will look after me.
But I don't care about all these references from you.
Can you stop the bullshit and address the issues here?
For non-americans. This is frustrating as the world is past your parochial concerns.
Wake up America. Can yopu grow up and stop this GodThis and GodThat to make yopu feel good?
Welcome to the world if yopu can do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

america irrelevant
Posted by: The Butcher on Sep 19, 2005 2:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is this what you want?
this is happenning right now thru your foreign policies.
No amount of Hollywood Crap will correct the trend.
Thanks to your President.
Wait until Asians realize they can screw you...
Be very afraid. How many of you are prepared to be servants to rich Chinese in America?
You are a bunch of Morons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do we hate america?
Posted by: The Butcher on Sep 19, 2005 3:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yes we do.
we watch your brainsmothering shows.
our elite buy them and you pay them.
how can we admire tom cruise? goodness!
now grassroot. can you liberate the world.
can america make amends for the cold hand on the world?
yes I hate america for turning my forest into a plantation.
I hate america for dowsizing my culture to artefacts
I hate america for its arrogance and imposition.
Can sane americans react? Can you stop praying and actually act as people who have free will?
I am sick and tired of reading your hysterics. Are you actually doing something to stop the madness your collective ass has launched onto the world?
I met you in Jakarta and you were Ugly Americans, I met you in Bangkok, Airline Captains and you were ugly.
How much do we have to suffer your childish behaviour?
Do I hate you collectively? Yes. You are ugly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Do we hate america? Posted by: Captainmagic