Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The High Price of Airline Deregulation

By David Morris, AlterNet. Posted September 15, 2005.


In the last quarter-century, the rate of bankruptcy among air carriers has been as much as 10 times higher than that of the general business community.
Advertisement

A month ago, I was searching online for a nonstop flight from Albany, N.Y. to Washington, D.C. United's flight was full, but a direct flight was available from a company called Independence Air and it was $100 cheaper. I was intrigued. Having never heard of that airline, I did what any seasoned traveler would do -- I googled it. A story from USA Today, dated the day before, reported that Independence Air's CEO had just notified the securities community that the airline might file for bankruptcy, perhaps even before my flight was to take off.

Independence Air: born 2004, died 2005, a remarkably common corporate tombstone in the era of deregulated airlines.

This July, the Government Accounting Office issued a report discussing the dismal financial state of the industry. "While the airlines industry was deregulated 27 years ago, the full effect on the airline industry's structure is only now becoming evident," it concluded.

In the 27 years before airline deregulation, no airline went bankrupt. Since 1978, 160 airlines have come and gone. In the last quarter-century, the rate of bankruptcy among air carriers has been as much as 10 times higher than that of the general business community. In 2005, virtually all major airlines are either in bankruptcy (United and US Air were joined Wednesday by Delta and Northwest) or on the verge of bankruptcy. How did we come to this?

In the late 1970s, the airline system was straining under an inflexible and cumbersome regulatory system. A long, drawn-out proceeding was needed simply to get permission from the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) for employees of two affiliated airlines to wear similar uniforms! Something needed to be done.

The liberals in control of Congress, the White House and the CAB opted for revolution rather than evolution. Rather than mend the existing system, they blew it up. By the early 1980s, federal controls over the entry and exit of airlines, over flight schedules and airfares were abolished. Quality of service requirements ended. Financial oversight was abandoned. Only airline safety remained under federal regulation.

Today, conservatives control Congress and the White House, and they fight even the tiniest move to reestablish some federal control over airlines. A near consensus exists that airline deregulation, in the words of The Economist, has been a "virtually unqualified success."

From my perspective, the cost-benefit analysis of airline deregulation depends on how wide a lens one is using.

Advocates of deregulation point to the fact that the number of air passengers has soared since 1978. They rarely note that it soared just as fast in the years before deregulation. They point out that airline rates have dropped significantly since deregulation for most (but not all) passengers. They rarely divulge that rates fell just as fast in the 27 years before deregulation.


Digg!

David Morris is co-founder and vice president of the Institute for Local Self Reliance in Minneapolis, Minnnesota and director of its New Rules project.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
As it should be
Posted by: LMNOP on Sep 15, 2005 3:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In the 27 years before airline deregulation, no airline went bankrupt. Since 1978, 160 airlines have come and gone."

This is yet another example of the mind numbing stupidity of the conservative American leadership and their commitment to the ideology of greed. Evidence even of this magnitude will not budge these free market ideologues from their mantra that all government intervention is oppressive and counter-efficient. If they get a whiff of a nickel, they begin pacing and snarling and behaving irrationally even to the destruction of their airline industry.

And while I'm on the subject of intellectual poverty, how about the American people themselves who, except for the Clintonian hiccup, have been re-electing these parasites continually since 1980 and admiring them (Ronald and little George) like they were salt of the earth, highly moral men of great resolve when in fact they were simps used to garner votes and nothing more.

I'm sorry, but in the tradition of an ancient Greek tragedy or Shakespeare's Lear, people this flawed, this monumentally stupid and arrogant, this immoral, people capable of such folly, deserve a tragic ending, and so they shall have it. It wouldn't be right any other way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A dim view of air travel.
Posted by: Colin on Sep 15, 2005 4:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Airline deregulation has had other highly significant impacts outside of the traditional scope of economics, particularly the massive increase in air travel. True, this makes for a more convenient society but it does have another dramatic influence - that of the environment. These factors, as it's absence in the article indicates, are typically relegated to the realms of another story.

How big an impact? Well, 9/11 offered the world an insight into just how significant the impact of burning fossil fuels so high in the atmosphere. As you'll remember, all planes were grounded which offered scientists a chance to see what kind of difference this made. The results are mind boggling.

The gist is basically that all the pollution in the atmosphere is deflecting the suns rays, a phenomenon called 'Global Dimming'. The problem being, if pollution is cooling the earth, to what extent is also global warming actually a problem? Certainly, it would suggest, a whole lot more than everyone is crossing their fingers and counting on.

For more information on global dimming please follow this link to a BBC documentary aired on the subject earlier this year, complete with both a well written summary and a full transcript.

Maybe we should be crossing our fingers and hoping many more airline companies go the way of the fated 160 mentioned above.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A dim view of air travel. Posted by: montana freeman
Yet, the new Bankruptcy Bill protects corrupt CEOs
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 15, 2005 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a shame that Congress and the President passed a bill that allows corrupt wealthy elitists to hide all the money they want with bankruptcy protection but for the honest hardworker who has to deal with inevitable expenses such as medical expenses and hurricanes, they have to be over-punished. And "conservatives" call that personal responsibility?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deregulation is a disaster waiting to happen, except for CEO's
Posted by: lamar on Sep 15, 2005 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even though the airlines are going bankrupt, the CEO's of airlines are cashing in. US Airways is currently in bankruptcy and wants its workers to "share the sacrifice". Yet, US Airways also gave its bumbling CEO, David Siegel, an $11 million compensation package. What a piece of work this guy must be.

It just shows that greed in the airline business is just as destructive as greed at energy companies (Enron), insurance companies (AIG), and the telecoms (Worldcom).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Airlines
Posted by: 454545 on Sep 15, 2005 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in Canada our last remaining national airline, Air Canada, used to be owned by the federal gov. as what we call a 'crown corporation'. It was privatized in the era of deregulation. Over the last several years, news about the industry in our country has been dominated by stories of cost-cutting and insolvency. Air Canada has been teetering on bankruptcy for years and who do the privatizers go to for protection and bail-outs? The government. Of course many other budget airlines have come and gone, Noteably JetsGo that simply dissapeared one day, leaving employees without jobs or answers. I guess they figured they could just keep low-balling WestJet and profits would appear magically, or they would wait until the other low-cost rivals went out of business.

On the subject of deregulation, a Quebec court ruled that a man could seek private treatment in lieu of wait times for a procedure in our public healtcare system. Now the privatizers, who have a big erection over the prospect of private healthcare, are waiting to pounce. Our system of healthcare in Canada is usually referenced in arguments for universal access but we do have problems. Namely, the government over the years have used the time-tested method of bleeding a public institution they want destroy of cash, then blaming it's resulting innefficiency on the fact that it is publicly run. Under the NAFTA agreement, if we deregulate our healthcare system, American Insurers and Healthcare vultures can demand access to the market. No offence to our American cousins but we don't want your goddamned HMO nightmare spilling into our system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Could we have predicted this trend for deregulation?
Posted by: Colin on Sep 15, 2005 9:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it fascinating hearing stories such as the one above because it's something I'm watching happen here in England too. Tony Idiot has introduced his own ideas such as foundation hospitals and the dreaded PFI initiatives which are slowly seeing an end to goodwill in Britain.

If I can be so bold, I would offer one of my own pet theories for the reason behind this. It occurs that there may be a reason why this trend started in the eighties and gained momentum since. I suppose the question I asked myself is; why now? Why not in the past? Why bother with 'Crown Corporations' in the first place? Why not just have it in the hands of the few from the start?

My thinking has led me to one event that could change the psyche of an entire generation - war, specifically WW2. Let me emphasise this once more, it's nothing more than my own opinion but I believe that WW2 had an enormous impact of the psychological make-up of everyone alive throughout the war years. I think that post-WW2 you had a generation of parents who wanted the very best for their children like no generation ever has in the past. They wanted it because they had seen the alternative. Look at the sixties, fine there was a technological revolution occurring but I don't believe that was the main reason for their creativity - I put that down to the fact parents allowed their kids to get away with it. It wasn't the kids were exceptionally creative but the parents were exceptionally tolerant.

So, the eighties greed occurred just as the levers of power were being transferred to the next generation. Gone were the war weary an in come the brats. Bush, Blair and many other Western leaders are all baby boomers. Is the reason they can't see what they're doing because they've literally been spoilt by kindness from day 1?

Fair enough, you would have a point arguing that it's wrong to take an individual instance and multiply up to gage a society but, equally, it makes a lot more sense to that than to take a society and divide down. One makes up the other, not the other way around. I also think there is value understanding that cataclysmic events do impact on individuals (9/11 anyone?) Surely then, a cataclysmic event that impacted everyone would make some difference?

The conclusion – what we are seeing now is a return to the norm rather than an ugly blip. From my understanding of history, that fits too unfortunately.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Be careful what you ask for
Posted by: bookwoman on Sep 16, 2005 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The airline industry begged for deregulation claiming that the regulations which insured that planes would be maintained and passengers would remain safe. They got what they asked for and now, one by one, the major airlines are dying. They have been given so many chances including an injection of cash after 9/11. Its time to say enough. Smaller, more flexible airlines are proving much more successful, and the larger ones have been done in by the very changes they asked for and received.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]