Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Teaching In America: The Impossible Dream

By ZP Heller, AlterNet. Posted September 15, 2005.


Many public school teachers today must work two jobs to survive, and can't afford to buy homes or raise families. A new book asks why we treat our teachers so poorly.
Teaching In America: The Impossible Dream
Advertisement

The new book Teachers Have It Easy, which collects roughly 200 interviews with educators from around the country, couldn't have a more ironic title. Co-written by former teachers Daniel Moulthrop and Nínive Clements Calegari, and author Dave Eggers (A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius), the book highlights the bleak reality that not only are America's teachers grossly underpaid, but that teaching is simply not a sustainable profession it its current form.

Through compelling accounts, Teachers Have It Easy dispels one of the biggest myths about teaching in public schools -- that the paltry salaries educators receive are adequate compensation for summer vacations and "shorter work days." Instead, the book paints a Dickensian picture of our educational system, in which teachers routinely work 10-12 hour days that don't end when the dismissal bell rings.

The idea for the book arose from conversations between Eggers and Calegari, co-founders of the non-profit 826 Valencia, which offers tutoring and writing workshops for youth. (A new center, 826NYC, recently opened in Brooklyn.)

"The idea was Dave's to begin with," Moulthrop told me. "When he was in his twenties, he had friends, including his sister, who were teachers and loved their work. For them it was the best job on the planet. A few years later, they all quit because of the money. It was just a travesty."

Eggers' friends were not the only ones who discovered how impossible it can be to eke out a living as an educator. A recent study by the University of Pennsylvania, as noted in the book, found that 46 percent of teachers leave within their first five years. Such high turnover and instability undoubtedly wreaks havoc on public schools and their respective communities, in which teachers play a vital role.

"If teachers are just leaving at the peak of their game," Moulthrop says, "their students were ill-served by the system."

While Moulthrop is a noted journalist, and Eggers' reputation is well known in the literary world, Teachers Have It Easy succeeds because it allows the underpaid, unappreciated teachers to speak for themselves.

Take Jonathan Dearman, who was the only African American teacher at San Francisco's Leadership High School, a public charter school. Dearman, like so many public school teachers, was beloved

because he devoted everything to a job he loved. He often worked 70- to 80-hour weeks because it was "the only way he could come close to feeling successful." In addition to teaching, Dearman set up an informal support club for minority students, in some cases becoming a surrogate parent.

"There was a teacher who was integral to the culture of school and the community," Moulthrop said of Dearman. "He set absolutely the highest standards ... kids failed his class and yet they still did all of the work all year long."

After five years as a teacher, however, Dearman, who has a master's degree in education, was making just over $40,000 a year. As is often the case with public school teachers, Dearman neglected his wife and kids to raise other people's children. He also accrued $15,000 in credit card debt, most of which was spent on supplies for the classroom. At times, Dearman even sacrificed his own health because his world revolved around his students. Once he forgot his daily insulin injection and ended up spending a night in the hospital. Still, he made it to school the next morning in time to teach all day.

Now a realtor, Dearman makes about $80,000 -- double the annual salary he earned as a teacher -- in only two months. Yet it was his newfound liberty that Dearman recalled as being the major upside to leaving the field of education. "That was one of the first things I realized when I got out of teaching," he said. "I can leave when I want to. I can go to the bathroom when I want, I can go get a cup of tea when I want, and I can eat when I want. I couldn't do that when I was a teacher."


Digg!

Zack Pelta-Heller, a graduate student at The New School, taught school for two years in Manhattan. His mother taught in the Philadelphia public school system for over 35 years.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It´s About Time
Posted by: ZPaul on Sep 15, 2005 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It´s about time somone spelled it out clearly and unequivocally for our society

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You think PA and NY are bad, come over to VA and other red states
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 15, 2005 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's always a education budgest crisis in the state. Governor Mark Warner has done some tempering of it compared to Republican governors including Allen and Gilmore who made a complete mess of the state budget along with most Republicans controlling the legislature. Tim Kaine, while not perfect, isn't all that bad on the education issue either compared to Jerry KILgore and Potts, neither of whom have any plans on education except demonizing it as a waste of taxpayer money. The sad part is even when moderate Republicans would work with Mark Warner and most Democrats to try to fix the education budget in this state, terrorists like Dick Armey, Grover Norquist, Pat Robertson, and other rightwing jihadists would swoop in and make false accusations of over-taxation and calling public education immoral and push for ballot initiatives (easily rig-able of course) to make it look as if voters strongly oppose using taxpayers' money to keep public education affordable and well worth the quality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

so many teachers leave the profession early on is to marry and start families.
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 15, 2005 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lord have mercy. Sorry my atheist friends, gotta pray on this one. God help.

I left junior college to marry and start a family. Big f**king mistake. Don't do it . I finally graduated from junior college with my AA in Child Development. I got to meet the cute mayor of SF, for the third time, on the stage. I knew he was heading for divorce. Thought about chasing him. Nah. ;)

At any rate, now I no longer want to work as an early childhood educator. And everyone is like "you should be a teacher". Well I took a class called Orientation to Education at CCSF and the textbook was Savage Inequalities by Jonathan Kozol.

But I don't need to textbook to tell me about the problems. I dropped out of GWHS. I attended that famous Urban Pioneers program that got shut down because two kids died out in the wilderness. I got pneumonia when it was our turn to go camping, so I missed that.

This article paints a bleak and dismal picture...I have also been told I "should" be a counselor...It is possible that is the direction I might head in...As a single mother I can not afford to be crying on the floor praying to God cleaning toilets. I do enough that as it is in my vocation as a single mother. I do not want to do that for a living.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NIHILISM by Eugene Rose Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: NIHILISM by Eugene Rose Posted by: bornxeyed
» Ok, sorry Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Ok, sorry Posted by: bornxeyed
» Knowledge Posted by: Olympiada
» Atheists and prayer part 1 Posted by: bornxeyed
» creation vs. evolution Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: creation vs. evolution Posted by: bornxeyed
» Bishop Usher Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Bishop Usher Posted by: bornxeyed
» Write the critique! Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Write the critique! Posted by: bornxeyed
» Evolution Posted by: Olympiada
» evolution Posted by: bornxeyed
» Compassion Posted by: Olympiada
» Atheists and prayer part 2 Posted by: bornxeyed
» I am humbled Posted by: Olympiada
» Christian Apologetics Posted by: Olympiada
» Olympiada & bornxeyed Posted by: nadezhda
» Thank you Posted by: Olympiada
Teaching promises a low salary career
Posted by: lamar on Sep 15, 2005 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I left the teaching profession because I was dead broke all the time and there was no prospect of earning a middle class salary. I wasn't asking for much, but I also am not willing to live (or start a family) in near poverty. Bright young teachers leave the field all the time because they just can't make it as teachers. Most teachers who stay either (1) have an independent source of income, or (2) couldn't hack it in the private sector.

Imagine if you went to a career fair and the banner read: "Low pay, constant scrutiny, and underhanded politics" How fast would you run to sign up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Perhaps lamar is bitter Posted by: Olympiada
» Well you are smart lamar Posted by: Olympiada
Lack of respect for the teaching profession
Posted by: CrystalD on Sep 15, 2005 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A discussion on another board I frequent turned into speculation on lack of respect for the teaching profession. I'm going out on a long theoretical limb here, but I wonder if teachers are underpaid and disrespected because so many people "hated school" when they were kids? Kids hate school, think teachers are mean, etc. and grow into adults who run for office and slash education budgets, and think teachers teach because they can't do anything else.

Which brings me to another idea we discussed, that teaching is viewed as a "last resort" career for those who can't hack it in other fields. There was a time when teaching was viewed as a terrific career - indeed just about the ONLY career - for bright, educated young women who wanted to work. Now these bright young women go into law or business or graphic design or what have you, and teaching has gotten the reputation as an easy-peasy career choice for ditzes or dullards. Not that this IS true, but it's what is PERCEIVED.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Teaching as a back up Posted by: crz53
» RE: Teaching as a back up Posted by: CrystalD
» Law Posted by: Olympiada
» Polygamy Posted by: Olympiada
We trashing our future by not supporting our teachers
Posted by: LeisureGuy on Sep 15, 2005 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The long-term effects of under-supporting eduation will hit us hard in time--just as undersupporting levee maintenance and repair around New Orleans hit that city hard. And cleaning up New Orleans will cost MANY times what the timely maintenance of levees and wetlands would have cost. But when the chickens come home to roost for our lack of support for education, it will take a least a generation to fix it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Low pay? Two jobs to make ends meet? It's the same for other working folks too!
Posted by: zooeyhall on Sep 15, 2005 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off, let me say that I am NOT an anti-tax bare bones government type of individual, I am an unabashed no-apologies liberal/progressive. I live in rural northeast Nebraska, and I have to say that here--at least--teachers are heads and shoulders above the rest of us with regards to wages, benefits, etc.

In my small town (pop. 450) high school, teachers are earning about $30,000/year. Maybe that doesn't sound like much, but the average person in my community is earning $18,000/ year. Plus--they have an outstanding health and pension package. I would guess that at least half the jobs in my area have minimal if any health coverage. As far as retirement plans, a recent economic development commission report in my area stated that only 24% of local employers have any sort of pension/401 k plan for their workers.

And boy, if the public school teachers have it good my area, you should see what the local community colleges pay! I am a pc tech with 10+ years experience. The best job I have been able to get pays $24,000/year. Recently, our local college advertised for a pc tech position and they were offering $40 k for this position! People in the IT industry around here that I talked to were stunned at the generous compensation. Additionally, the local community colleges (there are two in my local area) pay 100% of their employees health costs--try to find a private company that does that nowadays.

I am sure that the conditions here in Nebraska can't be much different that it is for teachers in most other similar states. I really wish we could all be making good money, have less hours, etc. And it is easy to run around yelling "TEACHERS ARE HAVING IT TOUGH!! TEACHERS NEED MORE PAY!!" To which the average working Joe would reply "So What, I'm having it tough too!"

I think the issue needs to be set against the larger one of the general decline in wages for ALL working people, and the general decline of the middle class. It is heartbreaking for me to see in my local area college educated people who can't get ANY job who would be glad to take on the job of a public school teacher.

Sorry folks, but at least where I live teachers--while having some of the negative things mentioned in the article--are doing very well in relation to others in my local work force.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Interesting comment. Posted by: Olympiada
Why Do Our Teachers Treat The Truth So Poorly?
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 15, 2005 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Johnny/Jane cannot read, write, spell, compute and know very little about history, geography, art, music or philosophy. They DO, however know about the made-up holiday of Kwanzaa.

"Kwanzaa From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Not to be confused with the Kwanza River in Angola, or the Angolan currency, "Kwanza".
Kwanzaa is a week-long, African American holiday observance held from December 26 to January 1. Timed to serve as an alternative to the growing commercialism of Christmas, it was founded in 1966 by Ron Everett, a.k.a. Ron Karenga, African-American activist, convicted felon, and director of the Black Studies department at the California State University, Long Beach. Kwanzaa is not a religious holiday, but a cultural one, a syncretic festival, based on various elements of the first harvest celebrations widely celebrated in Africa, around the 10th month of the year. According to a survey conducted by the National Retail Foundation in October 2004, 1.6% of consumers celebrate Kwanzaa."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good point bornxeyed Posted by: Olympiada
» Thank you, I agree baseplate Posted by: Olympiada
» Ok - jumping into the fray Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Ok - jumping into the fray Posted by: baseplate
» RE: Ok - jumping into the fray Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Ok - jumping into the fray Posted by: bornxeyed
Orwell's "1984" Accurately Predicted Our Current Condition
Posted by: Sojourner on Sep 15, 2005 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who do you think loses when the market makes brokers into winners? Our economic system is "Whatever the market will bear." Currently the market will bear the steady decline of American education when compared with other nations. It will bear the obvious evidence of an uninformed electorate being easily misled by clever word merchants. It will bear lock-step uniformity in a world where everything is put up for sale.

Individual freedom? It's not for sale. It must be earned by self-development. It takes a dull mind to allow public officials to create the chain-gang of rush hour freeway traffic. The same dull mind supports a war on terrorism, a war in Iraq, and a war on drugs -- none of which can be won. All of which can be found in Orwell's "1984," which dull minds cannot read.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One honestly must ask...
Posted by: poonoggin on Sep 15, 2005 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Is our children learning?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One honestly must ask... Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: One honestly must ask... Posted by: nadezhda
Boo Freakin' Hoo
Posted by: saramarie on Sep 15, 2005 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I once had a teacher who always complained that she was poor. She was tenured and had been in the school teaching for probably about twenty years or more. Her clothes were always flashy and expensive looking, and she used to always show us pictures from the two cruises that she took every year. The time that she told me that my mother, a home daycare provider, must have it so easy making all that money to be a "home-maker", I almost threw a fit. How insulting.

Another teacher recently told the class that teaching was at least a little better than working 22 hours a week at McD's and making only $12K a year. If I had been drinking something then, I probably would have choked nearly to death and had to leave the classroom! I work about 40 hours a week for little over minimum wage every week and will probably not take home more than $10K this year.

I've been told by some wiser souls that the problem with many teachers is that they never left the education system and really, really went out into the real world, the one that the rest of us live in, so they have no perspective and exaggerate their "hardships" to the rest of us.

I'm going to be a teacher, eventually. High school History. I couldn't think of a profession I could get more out of. I'd rather be doing the world a service by helping out kids in a classroom than selling them crap that will make them overweight, and I can get full benefits, weekends, holidays, and summers off. Also, the minimum a teacher seems to make in NY is about $30K a year, three times what I currently make. I can stop worrying about whether I can pay increasingly expensive energy bills (trust me, utility cut-offs are the most nerve-racking, humiliating experiences you can go through!) and buy a decent car with an income like that (I currently take a bus everywhere)! Also, you know that teaching is a demanding job, so if you want to do it, maybe you should think twice before starting a family. I know I don't want one. Think about it this way: you know you wouldn't get a puppy if you had to be at work all day, so why have a kid? Is it really fair? Instead of making more little problem children, help out some of the ones already existing... in the classroom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boo Freakin' Hoo Posted by: txjill
» Kids for txjill Posted by: Olympiada
» Be careful what you pray for Posted by: Sojourner
» Hello Sara Marie Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Hello Sara Marie Posted by: decembrist
» Excellent point decemberist Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Boo Freakin' Hoo Posted by: Pascale
» RE: Boo Freakin' Hoo Posted by: Basenjis
» That's judgemental basenjis Posted by: Olympiada
Been there...
Posted by: akdave on Sep 15, 2005 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After working for 12 years as a field biologist, a job I loved, I went into teaching in order to make what I thought was an important contribution to my state and country. I felt the way to battle environmental problems was through an educated public. I could use my previous education and practical experience in the classroom.

I spent two years in school and went into debt to become certified to teach science and mathematics. I trained under a master teacher and really felt I had found my niche. I taught for three years working 10-12 hours a day, six days a week, and despite students who had no discipline at home and administrators who had private agendas, I loved my job. At the end of three years I was let go with no explanation. I spent the next five years trying to get another full time position but was repeatedly turned down due to my age, 40s, and my MS degree. I finally realized older teachers are less malleable and why pay for additional education when you can get a cheap, fresh teacher straight out of college.

I am now a statistician (went back to school again!) and teach part time at a local community college. I still love to teach but can not afford to do it full time.

Only a non-teacher would think its an easy job. The three months 'off' are necessary to recharge for the next school year, and, of course, take those required classes to maintain your certification!

Peace,

David
Kodiak

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Been there... Posted by: Basenjis
» Thank you David Posted by: Olympiada
I LOVE to teach
Posted by: Shakti on Sep 15, 2005 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I quit a prestigious research track faculty position at an Ivy League university to spend more time with my daughter and look for a full time teaching position.

Amazingly, given the terrible academic job market, I finally found a non-tenure track position. The pay is not great but I love teaching.

So, I have thought very deeply about this issue - why do I love teaching so much, why does it pay so poorly, why do people not value teaching as a profession?

I think the reason research is valued more than teaching is that research is more about intellect and teaching is more about emotions - head versus heart. To teach well, one must *care* about the students ... teaching is a form of service to humanity. It can even be a kind of healing in the sense that you are helping young people grow whole. Head-oriented occupations pay more than heart-oriented occupations. Look at medicine and nursing.

Teaching young children is very much like parenting, and we know how much our society values full-time parents. As a nation we scorn feminine, nurturing, caring, compassionate approaches and valorize masculine, disciplining, conquering, competitive approaches to just about everything (including governance). No wonder teaching pays so little.

Also, because children (and seniors) do not contribute to the GNP, they are discounted and the persons who care for them are not valued and therefore do not earn much, if they earn anything at all.

The sorry state of education in this country is a direct result, in my opinion, of underlying societal values that have diminished all things "yin" and aggrandized all things "yang."

It is, of course, short sighted, unwise, and unsustainable, as are all systems so unbalanced.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I LOVE to teach Posted by: redjenny
» RE: I LOVE to teach Posted by: cindyw
» RE: I LOVE to teach Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: I LOVE to teach Posted by: LPB
Children = Problems
Posted by: cameron2610 on Sep 15, 2005 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...in an already tight situation.

I definitely sympathize with those whose real wages are decreasing in a country with growing economic inequality, but why do people feel sorry for themselves when their own children drive them into poverty? Having children is an option, and at around $10,000 each per year (as the author points out), you'd be better off filling your garage with luxury cars. What do you expect when you create something that you know will consume all your time and resources? And Earth is already overpopulated by humans, who make life worse for all other species. "But I just feel in my heart that it will work out somehow." "But I'm meant to have a family!" Get over it then. It's up to you to be strong and make smart decisions (in areas where you do have a choice) or you'll suffer. That's the world we live in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ramblings
Posted by: hhartman on Sep 15, 2005 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Teaching is not unlike social services, my chosen profession, we are overburdened by trying to "fix" and take care of the problems of society. Teachers are overburdened with the duty of educating our children, but also to be the babysitter, the parent, as well as to play the politics game. What the Feds are doing to education is the same thing that has happened here in Oregon to our children. First it started off in the early nineties with two different laws that ensured lower property taxes at the expense of teaching, and then moved onto the creation of a benchmark based system to test our kids.

The NCLB Act did nothing to help children, it just created a system to where underpreforming schools lose money. Now, it may just be common sense, but I would think instead of taking funding away from schools that have no money and in fact leaving the schools unable to teach their chilren, you reinvest money into those schools so that they can have the tools to better educate kids. Yet, that would make sense to me.

I am starting to believe my friend who theorizes that it is part of the right wing, fundamentalist christian agenda to defund public schools because they do not teach "Christian Values". But I digress....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Right Wing Fundamentalists Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: amblings Posted by: cindyw
» RE: amblings Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: amblings Posted by: Basenjis
Regardless of the speculation, the low $$ says it all...
Posted by: txjill on Sep 15, 2005 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went into teaching because I loved school, loved many of my teachers and wanted to help people. Quickly, I realized that I am spending my own money (I didn't have much...I made $19,800 my first year in TX) to pay for supplies and to live. With long hours of planning, red tape (principal says put up cutesy crap in your room to impress the parents, but spend your own money) and latchkey kids who didn't have the support at home, I finally gave it up for the private sector.

That is too bad, but I make 6 figures now and life is easy compared to the hard work I did teaching and socializing the kids, working on things parents should teach at home. The other problem is that you have to follow so many guidelines to follow and "teach to the test" issues, which leaves out all the creative ways you can present information to a child and teach that child to love learning.

I am a Liberal, but I have to wonder if teaching was set up like a business and paid that way, would we not get some incredible teachers and plenty of resources at their disposal? What I cannot understand is why the bigger picture is not seen here. We could effectively wipe out some of this teen pregnancy, people being poor, abuse and probably crime if more was invested in education.

I have been on both sides and yes, there are lazy teachers, but if the standards aren't set higher and the pay higher, you are going to have lousy teachers. Do you think the person who cooked your fries really gives a crap how well those fries are cooked at Mickey Ds?

Like any profession...until you walk a mile in those shoes, you don't know what it is like.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Been There, Couldn't make a living
Posted by: PalEBoy on Sep 15, 2005 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As part of the dot-com melt down, I ended up teaching math&cs at a nearby HS. It was fun and it was rewarding in every way except financially. As a mid-career person, I could not afford to get by on what was less than unemployment. I have a house, family, etc. If it wasn't for my wife working, I would have had to cover health care; and the employee contribution was 50%. Yes, fifty percent. Ouch.

I think that if you get into teaching young, when you have low expenses, you can rise thru the salary ranks and make a decent living. The problem, as I see it, is that to effectively teach math/science at the high school level, you have to had real-world experience. And that means mid-career switching; which the current union negotiated salary structures do not support. You're right at the bottom with a kid fresh out of school and no real-world experience. Who suffers for this? The very people being served; the kids.

I brought this up with my local congresscritter and the response was how he was suppportive of mentor initiatives to help keep new teachers in the profession. He couldn't get it thru his skull that It's the money, stupid!. Sigh. MA offered up 20k$ bonus for people to get into teaching (paid out over 4 years; 5k$/yr). This fast-tracked you to getting a license. But, you had to commit to teaching in an underperforming district. Frankly, putting a brand new teacher in underperforming districts is, IMO, a perfect recipie for quick burnout. Also, MA reneged on the last year of the payout. How would that make someone feel?

So, now I'm back in industry. One of my former students used me in her college application as an example of someone who openned her eyes to the possibilities of math. The essay had me in tears. I could still be making that difference; but for the lack of $$.

I think the undersupport of education is symptomatic of undersupport of any publicly funded activity. The funding mechanism doesn't scale. Another way of funding education (and public works in general) must be found.

I don't have any answers; but dammit I do see the symptoms of the problems every day. People who think intelligent design (I won't grace it with capital letters) is real is a symptom of poor education. People who let a government lie to them and yet eat it up and vote against their economic self-interest; who aren't capable of critical thought. That's another symptom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rural Nebraska vs. Urban Orlando
Posted by: lamar on Sep 15, 2005 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And teachers are making the same in urban areas with much higher cost of living. Either way, $30,000 might attract people in rural Nebraska, but certainly not in areas where the vast majority of people live.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ural Nebraska vs. Urban Orlando Posted by: monkeywrench
UNIONS ARE A SCAM!!!
Posted by: lamar on Sep 15, 2005 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What business do I have saying this on Alternet? If you've ever been involved with teaching, you probably know how bad and corrupt the unions are. Contract negotiations are a sad joke and teachers get the same raw deal every renewal. In New York City, the union fancies itself a local politician, and of course, fails in its ability to get more money for the teachers, yet it takes a chunk in dues. Somebody please give me a positive story about a teacher's union!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: UNIONS ARE A SCAM!!! Posted by: hhartman
» RE: UNIONS ARE A SCAM!!! Posted by: bettsoff
» You are right Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: UNIONS ARE A SCAM!!! Posted by: brer
Conspiracy?
Posted by: akdave on Sep 15, 2005 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have several friends who have been teachers for decades and through their experiences I have seen how inadequate our public education is. For being an outstanding grade school teacher, one friend found her classes loaded with students with the most severe learning and behavior problems; this was her 'merit pay'. Another brought several hundred thousand dollars worth of grants into his school district and started an award winning environmental education program only to have the money and classes handed over to another teacher; this was his 'thanks'.

I guess while Norquist's buddies is starving the government so they can drown it in the bathtub they are making sure the voting public is too ignorant to figure out what is going on...

Peace,

David
Kodiak

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Conspiracy? Posted by: Basenjis
overarching agenda
Posted by: pickeju on Sep 15, 2005 12:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm suprised that people in general haven't caught on to the overarching theme of education in politics lately. There is so much being done to eliminate public schools it boggles the mind. Teachers are left out in the cold and "no child left behind" is poised to prove that the entire system is a failure. Well they're wrong. Public education is a beautiful thing, a gift we give ourselves as a country. If we're going to prevent schools from becoming entirely privatized, we need to step up and protect the system. Part of that is ensuring that people who teach are well-trained and content.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

we deserve more
Posted by: blogmommy on Sep 15, 2005 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Mr. Pelta-Heller, for bringing attention to this important issue. Teachers are not only vastly underpaid for the amount of work that they do, but there is also a lack of respect associated with the profession (and as an early childhood teacher, I know this firsthand). There's always a thought that if you are smart and educated you wouldn't make the choice to be a teacher because you're never going to be financially successful. There's only one reason to be a teacher and that is love for the true essence of the job--helping children. Teachers cannot do it for the money, they must do it for the children. When our society starts valuing and respecting the work that teachers do, maybe they can then get a decent wage, enough supplies and the support they need to do the best job possible. The current situation is not only an affront to teachers everywhere, but also a disservice to the children of our country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes! Posted by: crz53