Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

It's Accountability Time

By Scott Ritter, AlterNet. Posted September 9, 2005.


Hurricane Katrina has blown away the layers of lies peddled by the Republican government over the last four years.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Study Claims Even the Most Sophisticated Readers Can Be Manipulated
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Scott Ritter

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The power and fury of Hurricane Katrina has momentarily pushed to the side the fourth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. However, to fully understand the ramifications of Hurricane Katrina, and the failings on the part of our government to protect us from harm, we must not forget that before Katrina there was an event we were told “forever changed the world we live in.”

September 11, 2001 represented not only a dark day for New York City and its citizens, but all of America and indeed the world. In retrospect, the gravest damage inflicted by that act of terrorism wasn't the human suffering and material loss, but rather the serious assault on the very soul of the United States by those who used the horrific events of 9/11 for political purpose.

This “assault” came in the form of actions on the part of the Bush administration, a cowed Congress, and a compliant media that worked hand in glove to spin the events of September 11, 2001 into a storm of hype and fear that exploited an already traumatized people. This conditioned them to accept at face value any characterization of events, no matter how far removed from fact, as well as any remedy put forward as a solution, no matter what the cost to fundamental notions of liberty and justice as set forth by the Constitution.

From the smoke and ashes of 9/11 came legislation in the form of the so-called “Patriot Act,” which represented a frontal assault by its conservative drafters on the very Constitution that defined a United States of America worth dying for. Congress voted unanimously to enact this legislation without even bothering to read it, since to vote against the Patriot Act was to open oneself to charges of being unpatriotic.

Congress went further, legislating into existence a new bureaucracy, the Department of Homeland Security, which at its best provided Americans with a nonsensical color-coded system for mandating national levels of fear, and at its worst created the illusion not only of an ever-present terrorist threat, but also the notion that the federal government, in its role as “Big Brother,” was there to protect us from all evil.

For nearly four years America proceeded down this path of self-induced ignorance and bliss, reassured by our Republican president and Republican-controlled Congress, as well as a compliant media. We were repeatedly told that a threat to our security loomed on the horizon, a threat so grave we as a people needed to cede our liberties to a benevolent federal authority that guaranteed the security of a nation we now called our “homeland.”

The newly erected Department of Homeland Security absorbed the various departments and agencies that had previously performed specialized tasks, such as border security, customs, and emergency response, under a single monolithic entity to serve as a guarantor of our collective protection.

Billions of dollars were spent in the name of “homeland security.” But under the Bush administration, homeland security really meant the domestic defense against terrorism, and even in this case the emphasis was placed on pre-emptive law enforcement (i.e., implementing the provisions of the Patriot Act) rather than actual response to an act of terror (i.e., providing aid and comfort to the victims of an attack).

Little heed was given to real threats to the collective security of our nation, such as tornadoes, earthquakes, wildfires, hurricanes and floods, and the impact these would have on the infrastructure and integrity of the nation. These real threats were never given a color-coded system for the purpose of hyping them to the American people; they were instead pushed into the background by a White House and Congress addicted to the legislative and electoral simplicity of fear of the unknown -- terrorism.

If anything, Hurricane Katrina has stripped away the many layers of deceit, deception and misinformation that have been peddled to the American people by the White House, Congress and the mainstream media regarding the true state of our national security. With the dead still uncounted in New Orleans and the Gulf States, Americans are coming to grips with the fact that the Bush administration, Congress and the Department of Homeland Security have been asleep at the wheel when it comes to protecting the citizens of the United States from the true threats facing us as a nation.

For the first time in a long time, the mainstream media broke ranks with the spin doctors in Washington D.C., the all too real face of human disaster compelling them to sort fact from myth, truth from hype. Finally, when the American people turn on their television sets, they are watching and listening to reporters and commentators who seem shocked and alarmed by the callous attitude and cavalier behavior of those entrusted by the American people to lead and protect them.

With this newfound clarity of vision, the mainstream media is starting to focus not just on the appalling lack of response from the government, but also for the first time on what is transpiring in Iraq. The post-9/11 period of journalistic sleepwalking allowed the Bush administration to get away with outright fabrication of intelligence information used to create a case for war based on weapons of mass destruction (WMD) that had long ago disappeared from Iraq. During this period, no one in the mainstream media had the integrity or courage to stand up and ask for any proof the Bush administration could provide to back up its unsubstantiated allegations about Iraqi WMD. More than two years have passed, and the media still refers to the WMD lie as an "intelligence failure," instead of the massive fraud it really was, and is.

It took a brave stance by a bereaved mother of a slain soldier outside the vacation home of President Bush to awaken the media to the harsh realities of the ongoing occupation of Iraq, and the absolute inadequacies of the system of government put in place by the United States. (Hopefully, reporters will soon stop speaking about the "Purple Finger Revolution" of January 2005 as reality, instead speaking of a U.S.-manipulated event that was neither free nor democratic).

As American service members continue to fight and die for a country that cannot even produce a viable constitution, perhaps the post-Katrina mainstream media will start accurately reporting on the realities of occupied Iraq with the same clarity and purpose they now grant to the coverage of the hurricane and its aftermath.

Hurricane Katrina may end up posing a great threat to the hold on power enjoyed by the Republican Party today. The 2006 mid-term elections are but a year away, and already the Republicans in Washington are scrambling to limit the political damage caused by the dual blows of Katrina and Iraq.

The American people and a newly enabled media must keep in place the very data filters that now provide so much clarity regarding the duplicity of the Bush administration and the Republican-controlled Congress, so as to prevent any bait and switch gambit that might be sprung in order to divert the attention of the nation away from the absolute requirement of electoral accountability.

At the end of the day we, the people, are in control of the people and bureaucracy we empower to govern us. The mechanism of our control is the process of free and democratic elections. No matter what the pundits and politicians say, 9/11 did not change this reality. In 2006 the American people will have the opportunity to express their will on the national stage.

Each and every one of us must ask ourselves whether are we happy with the people we have currently empowered to represent us. If the answer is no, then we must make sure that in the coming year we do everything in our power to identify those who have failed us, Republican and Democrat alike, and replace them with those who represent the will of the people, and not the will of special interests. If we fail to act, and America is once again struck by a calamity, whether it be an act of God here at home, or an act of illegitimate aggression abroad, we will have only ourselves to blame.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Scott Ritter was U.N. chief weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991-1998 and author of "Iraq Confidential: The Untold Story of America's Intelligence Conspiracy," to be published by I.B. Tauris (London) in October 2005.    

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
sovinformburo
Posted by: sovinformburo on Sep 9, 2005 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The illusion of freedom [in America] will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater."
-Frank Zappa-

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: johnny-boy2
» For Young John II Posted by: sovinformburo
» RE: For Young John II Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: awalton1
» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: sovinformburo
» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: awalton1
» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: BigD
» Brownie, you give a heckuva blow job! Posted by: Bic Pentameter
» Missing Frank, Right on! Posted by: Michiganman
Katrina Another Reason Why Bush/Cheney Must Be Removed
Posted by: rangerjim on Sep 9, 2005 4:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The debacle in getting aid to the people of New Orleans is another reason why this traitorous administration needs to be taken down. They are more interested in protecting the welfare of cocaine snorting corporate executives and commodities traders than they are the rest of the people, especially the poor people who were left to drown in New Orleans. I bet Adolf Hitler is smiling with approval at the deeds and actions of his prodigy,, George W. Bush and stooge, Dick(head)Cheney. These morons are more proof that Washington is just as smelly a cesspool as New Orleans has become as a result of the dike breach. Moreover, the heads of Homeland Security and FEMA are nothing but a pair of unqualified political hacks who know nothing about emergency management. If there was ever cause for a massive uprising in this country, it is the looting and plundering of the Bush Administration, while not quite as dangerous as Hitler was, is every bit as evil and insensitve.These Nazis have got to go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Strong position Ranger Jim Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Nice clear language, Ranger! Posted by: sovinformburo
sovinformburo
Posted by: sovinformburo on Sep 9, 2005 5:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whining and complaining will solve nothing. We know who these people are and what they do. They are ideologically driven and impervious to reasoned debate or indeed human dignity. Change will occur when Americans realise their country is a class ridden society and this is a class war. Change will only occur when the non elite achieve class consciousness (eg: blacks and poor whites acknowledge their interests coincide) and vote to break the republican stranglehold. But this will never happen because poor whites need to feel they are better than blacks and they do so by voting Republican, in other words, against their own interests. They get what they deserve. A precarious existance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: robchapman
» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: kww355
» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: sovinformburo
» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: leinco
» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: Scott
» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: leinco
» Bitter! Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Bitter! Posted by: JSquercia
» Dixiecrat Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Bitter! Posted by: sovinformburo
» haves and have mores Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: haves and have mores Posted by: sovinformburo
» fiction Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: fiction Posted by: sovinformburo
» RE: Bitter! Posted by: BillC
» So where can we go? Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: So where can we go? Posted by: sovinformburo
» Amerika Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Amerika Posted by: sovinformburo
» For olympiada Posted by: sovinformburo
» no offense Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: no offense Posted by: sovinformburo
» Difficult times Posted by: Olympiada
» If I may be so bold Posted by: nakis
» RE: If I may be so bold Posted by: Prometheus
» RE: sovinformburo Posted by: awalton1
Artists of Illusion
Posted by: reason on Sep 9, 2005 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is an "almost' illusion of a two party system. The DLC (The New Democrats) are more republican than democrats. They take turns voting in the bills that take protection away from the middle class.

There has been a stealth takeover by a group of people, mostly the rich, since the Reagan era. Some are listed on NPAC. They want to conquer the world, but not for the American people. They want to rule the world and they are sacrificing our military and our money to do it. It may be for the wealthy of all countries.

It is all tied in with WTO and IMF. To get a loan from the IMF, a country has to privatize their pensions and no telling what else. They are deliberately destroying the middle class.

They own most of the Media. They now have their sights on destroying the United Nations. Then there will be no stopping them. imho

Scott Ritter tried to stop the War against Iraq. I watched the Media demonize and discredit him.

We, the taxpayer, have given about a billion dollars to Homeland Security. The whole focus of that program has been on saving the rich and powerful. They didn't care about the rest of us and didn't bother to plan for the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Artists of Illusion Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Artists of Illusion Posted by: xyz2002
» RE: Artists of Illusion Posted by: reason
» Single party rule = totalitarianism Posted by: Bic Pentameter
» Reply to JB-2 Posted by: Bic Pentameter
Scott Ritter
Posted by: robchapman on Sep 9, 2005 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me personally thank Scott Ritter and write a brief testimonial to this courageous activist and writer.
In the run up to the Iraqi Invasion, Scott tirelessly shared the expertise he gained as an UNSCOM Inspector in Iraq.
Scott's work and outspokenness put paid all claims that the pre-Invasion intelligence showed the necessity of an invasion of Iraq.
Scott made a correct case that the optimal course of action was continued inspections by the UN and then if needed, coalition action.
Had Scott's recomendations been followed THE WORLD would have been mobilized in the democratization of Iraq.
Scott made his case previous to the Invasion, so his views are not those made with the benefit of hindsight, but are the result of hard eyed analysis of FACTS.
Scott's reward for his patriotism and outspokenness: trumped up criminal charges and harrassment by prosecutors.
Scott's case puts paid to claims that the US does not pursue political prosecution.
Scott Ritter is a patriot and more importantly, an honest man.
I salute him.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, New York

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Scott's reward Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: johnny-boy2
» Ideologue? Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Ideologue? Posted by: johnny-boy2
» caveat Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: trukman
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: surfreality
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: trukman
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Scott Ritter Posted by: trukman
Hurricane to hit Washington later this month.
Posted by: Capt H on Sep 9, 2005 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Peace Rally Sept. 24 - 26 Washington D.C.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where Has Scott Ritter Been?
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Sep 9, 2005 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, let me point out that I have nothing but admiration and respect for Scott Ritter. On the other hand, his article exposes a lack of historical perspective. He states that September 11 was "...an assault on the very soul of the United States" and triggered the Bush chimerical war on terrorism and the Bush campaign of fear-mongering to win support. This is not new. Presidents have been practising the same kind of deceit, fear-mongering and militarism since WWII. Truman launched the era of fear and militarism with the Truman Doctrine, NSC 68 and containment to create an atmosphere of fear of the imaginary Communist Worldwide Conspiracy to build the military-industrial complex and intervene in countries "worldwide" including Greece and Italy. As for the Patriot Act, there are ample precedents including the Alien Sedition Acts of 1798. Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus in 1862, the Sedition Act of 1918, and the Smith Act of 1940. It's important to maintain a historical perspective to truly understand what's happening today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where Has Scott Ritter Been? Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Where Has Scott Ritter Been? Posted by: mochajava13
» RE: Where Has Scott Ritter Been? Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Where Has Scott Ritter Been? Posted by: mochajava13
» RE: Where Has Scott Ritter Been? Posted by: johnny-boy2
agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Sep 9, 2005 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
9/11, That Day that WOKE UP America was an opportunity to lead the world in fighting terrorism as citizens of the Global Village.

Instead, we were told to "GO SHOPPING"
We were told "Evil is all out there"
We were propagancized back to sleep by the Doctrine of Fear peddled by this Aministration and its unilateral arrogant action. WAR is the ultimate expression of terrorism!!!

Hurrican Kat's aftermath provides us with the opportunity to reclaim the soul and true spirit of America: we are all created equally.

The hard truth is our 21st century American government failed to protect her citizens equally and failed to protect the home land in the home land.

"The Revolution starts now"- Steve Earle

www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: agitator church and state Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: agitator church and state Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: agitator church and state Posted by: Prometheus
Clarity
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 9, 2005 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice writing Scott. Clear and succinct. This article could go mainstream.

Seriously, I have just been on board here on AlterNet for about a month now and I am astounded at the amount of catching up I have to do. I can only imagine what that means for Joe Citizen who watches TV.

The American public is at the mercy of the media, if it allows itself to be, and most people to do. They are too tired and too indifferent to care. That has been my experience...It is hard to rouse people to change...

I only hope that by getting well grounded on AlterNet I will be able to carry the message to those who still suffer. :)

In other words, from ignorance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clarity Posted by: trukman
» RE: Clarity Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Clarity Posted by: trukman
» The enemy Posted by: Olympiada
plunger
Posted by: plunger on Sep 9, 2005 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who is Michael Chertoff and how did he rise to such power in the wake of 9/11?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: plunger Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: plunger Posted by: nakis
» RE: plunger Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: plunger Posted by: Doubtom
No New Taxes Needed
Posted by: JSquercia on Sep 9, 2005 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Vice President let slip in one of his remarks that this
Disaster will not require ANY New Taxes . We are told that the cost could easily exceed 200 billion for rebuilding effort in the Gulf Coast and yet as usual the Administration sees no need for to raise taxes .

The Senate had the " Decency " to put on hold repealing the
so called Death Tax . I believe this was done as a tatic to avoid showcasing just how much the government is in control of the Corporations and the Ultra Rich such as Bush's Pioneers .

The Democrats should react by proposing a Domestic Marshall Plan to rebuild the Devestated Area and Using the monies from the Death Tax as dedicated revenue Stream . The should focus the debate on the CHRISTIAN valuues of Love of Neighbor
and helping the Widow and the Poor . Don't let them get away
with using Abortion and Gay Marriage to distract us From the
True brand of Christianity in which Jesus said " Whatsoever you did to the LEAST of my brothers you did to ME " . He wasn't talking about giving Tax Cuts for the wealthy while starving "the Beast" as that slimeball grover Norquist refers to the government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No New Taxes Needed Posted by: Scott
plunger
Posted by: plunger on Sep 9, 2005 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And remember the story that was written in Popular Mechanics debunking all of those conspiracy Theories about 9/11?

Well check this out…

LET IT BE NOTED, THE PERSON WHO WROTE THIS IS BENJAMIN CHERTOFF, THE DIRECTOR OF HOMELAND SECURITY MICHEAL CHERTOFF’S COUSIN.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog/science/1249302.html

If we were looking for evidence of a coverup, wouldn’t this be a good place to start…or should we all just be “Coincidence Theorists?”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Homeland Security Means Pork
Posted by: BradKennedy on Sep 9, 2005 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scott Ritter, in an otherwise fine analysis, took a narrow view when he stated "under the Bush administration, homeland security really meant the domestic defense against terrorism,..." Homeland Security also meant to the Bush Administration another means for buying political allegiance to their extreme agenda. Remember, for example, Home Security funds buying garbage trucks in Minnesota but doing little to secure the Port of New York/New Jersey.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Homeland Security Means Pork Posted by: johnny-boy2
Faith in Electoral System Misplaced
Posted by: TFG54 on Sep 9, 2005 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Scott Ritter's otherwise cogent article I find his naive faith in the United States electoral system amazingly naive. How does he expect that those victimized by Katrina, the poor and ethnic and racial minorities, would ever find one of their own among the candidates, Republican or Democrat? Does he think the Iraq war would have been less likely under Demos? Did he check the vote in Congress authorizing it? Who is he kidding? It must be himself. People who put their faith in the electoral process as it now exists in this country believe that there is substantive difference in simply transferring political power from one elite group to another elite group. Ritter may know a bogus argument about WMDs when he sees one, but he apparently thinks that a substantially different interest group controls each of the two major political parties, or he believes that third party or independent candidates can get elected. I don't think there is any empirical data to support either of those positions. I wish there were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Message for John II Posted by: sovinformburo
» RE: Message for John II Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Message for John II Posted by: cyclone
First the clean up, THEN the pull out, and THEN the IMPEACHMENT!
Posted by: Voicedude on Sep 9, 2005 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll say it again:

The REAL business is ENDING THIS WAR!

After THAT we have every right, nay, the RESPONSIBILITY to DEMAND Bush & Cheney's resignation or impeachment!

John Dean (former Nixon advisor) put it so eloquently in his book "Worse Than Watergate - The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush". Dean served time for his part in Watergate, so he may know a thing or two about political misdeeds. A review of his book says:

"Dean argues that in asking Congress for a Joint Resolution authorizing the use of American force in Iraq, President Bush made a number of 'unequivocal public statements' regarding the reasons this country needed to pursue military force in pursuit of national interests. Through tradition, presidential statements regarding issues of national security are held to an expectation of 'the highest standard of truthfulness'. Therefore, no president can simply 'stretch, twist or distort' the facts of a case & then expect to avoid resulting consequences. Citing historical precedents, Dean shows how Johnson's distortions regarding the truth about the war in Vietnam led to his own subsequent withdrawal for candidacy for re-election in 1968, & how Nixon's attempted cover-up of the truth about Watergate forced his own resignation.

Bluntly stated, if Mr. Bush led this country into war based on bogus intelligence data, he is liable under the Constitution for manipulation & deliberate misuse of that data under the "high crimes" statute of that document, given the fact it is a felony to defraud the U.S. through such a conspiratorial action. It is time for both Congress & the American people to demand of Mr. Bush the same kind of high-minded honesty he pledged to us under the oath of office."


...considering the source, I find this quite damning. Same goes for Ritter's article. WHERE ARE THE SPINELESS DEMOCRATS ON THIS? Why is no one screaming 'foul'? Because we've been beat down by a complicit media? In Nixon's day, protesters were beaten down by club wielding police. Where's the righteous indignation, & WHEN do we actually DO SOMETHING?

Let's make sure that current Senate President Emil Jones, Jr. D - Chicago, & current House Speaker Dennis Hastert R - Ill., are ready to go when we remove Bush & Cheney from office for their High Crimes. We dealt with a new Prez & Veep 30 years ago & we can deal with it again. We HAVE to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Question for johnny-boy2 Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Question for johnny-boy2 Posted by: johnny-boy2
» rather grim outlook mochajava13 Posted by: Olympiada
» We Posted by: Olympiada
I beg to differ.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 9, 2005 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"At the end of the day we, the people, are in control of the people and bureaucracy we empower to govern us. The mechanism of our control is the process of free and democratic elections."

This is patently untrue. Our votes only decide which candidates will carry out the agenda of the campaign contributors. If we the people want to control the government we must buy the government. Campaigns must be funded only by the taxpayers or we'll never have control.
http://www.lincolninitiative.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I beg to differ. Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: I beg to differ. Posted by: maxpayne
» AGREE 10000% lincoln fan Posted by: Michiganman
A call for NEW leadership from the Baltimore Sun
Posted by: Voicedude on Sep 9, 2005 10:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe....just maybe the media is awakening.

Here's a recent article from the Baltimore Sun:
(the original link is too long to fit here, so go here:)

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/

(....and scroll down to the heading "After Katrina fiasco, time for Bush to go" dated Sept. 8, 2005)

Pray for the future of our country.

Our leaders get caught again and again and AGAIN in lies and complicity and ineptitude and moral bankruptcy, and yet continually dodge accountability, and eventually blame someone else for their misdeeds. If I had to use one word, ONLY ONE WORD to describe this administration it would be this:

ARROGANCE!

I said that EARLY in his first term. I repeated it after he whitewashed 9/11 and used our own dead as a publicity opportunity. And I said it repeatedly BEFORE the last election....and warned that if he won again it would only fuel his sense of entitlement.

The ARROGANCE is now at an unprecedented level. As he keeps dodging the very issues that should bring him down (Downing St. memo, Valerie Plame, Cindy Sheehan, etc.), it only re-enforces his delusions of grandeur.

WHEN do We, The People do something about it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» AGREE 10000% voicedude Posted by: Michiganman
» Prayer is right Posted by: Olympiada
"Truth vs. Rigged Elections?"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Sep 9, 2005 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Terrific article, and Scott speaks the truth; however, the "mechanism of our control," free and democratic elections, is now in peril as well, after the obviously rigged result that returned Bush and the "two-thirds Reich" to power in 2004. What are we supposed to do about that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Bullhorns for Katrina
Posted by: cestevens on Sep 9, 2005 12:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unlike the "war on terror," which is really a massive scam on the American people, there is nothing about this situation that appeals to the president on a personal level, no one to "smoke out" or "bring on," no Third-World despot to bully and serve as a vehicle by which to George may assert his masculinity. The plain truth is that our President is a textbook-case sociopath who would always choose to maim, kill, and destroy. Don't expect him to behave any differently, and you will never be disappointed when he fails to feel anyone's pain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» textbook case sociopath Posted by: Olympiada
Similar type of facist corruption. Different country.
Posted by: Smiggsy on Sep 9, 2005 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a complete outsider looking in.....I don't know what the difference is between the current governments of Zimbabwe or the United States of America. Similar type of facist corruption. Different country.

America - wake up from your long slumber of ignorance, excess, arrogance and stupidity beacuse your highly regarded position in the globe is slowly losing its sheen. Eventually the USA will be left with no global credibility. What a waste. What a shame

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» AGREE 10000% Smiggsy Posted by: Michiganman
» Dream Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Dream Posted by: mochajava13
» Delusion Posted by: Olympiada
» Zimbabwe Posted by: Olympiada
talk is cheap
Posted by: owleyes on Sep 9, 2005 12:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is anybody else out there sick of talking? Has anybody else had enough of watching our country fall apart before their eyes at the hands of these rapists? Our first priority, since we are Americans, is to help the Gulf Coast back to its feet. We should be prepared to sacrifice for this, to put our money where our mouths are. We know whose fault it is that this happened. We can't do anything about that just yet, so let's channel our anger toward something positive. Once some semblance of stability has been restored, Bush and company have got to go. They won't go willingly. We're going to have to make them go. This is going to take discipline and perseverance from us. We will have to be organized and brave. I hope you are all eating right, exercising, and getting plenty of rest, because we are all soldiers now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sign me up Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: talk is cheap Posted by: mochajava13
» World Criminal Court Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: World Criminal Court Posted by: mochajava13
» RE: World Criminal Court Posted by: Olympiada
» channel our anger Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: talk is cheap Posted by: cee
WE do NOT need any more proofs.
Posted by: humblecitizen on Sep 9, 2005 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
9-Sep-2005
We really do not need any more reazoning, any more hurricanes, any more crimes, to realize that the Bush Administration is destroying our nation, our world.
We simply have to use all the DOCUMENTED crimes Bush has committed, to impeach him and all his cabinet.
You migh say: ""But the Congress is ruled by the Republicans"". That is true. But, if we all act together, Congress will HAVE to heed the will of the people.
Why don't we do this? Have we lost our dignity?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's true, he can be impeached
Posted by: Michiganman on Sep 9, 2005 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very good comment. It's a complete mystery why Clinton can be impeached for personal misconduct while Bush skates on the piles of corrupt dung he has laid his whole 2 stolen terms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No way, Jose! Posted by: gr8reed
A country gets the Government it deserves.
Posted by: IanA on Sep 9, 2005 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US machine of government is broken, running a mock and you lost the tools to fixing it. Americans, is a fascist state run by corporations owning two political franchises. All power is by invitation only. Ignorance, indifference and glorification of self, and materialism, will insure for the electorate or rather non-electorate the continuity of the immediate administration and its successors. Smoke and mirrors as the piper marches them over the cliff.

9/11 – Terrorists that came from nowhere …. like the exhaustive investigation showed... There was no fault of the Government, they could never have guessed….. 8 governments warnings couldn’t be substantiated…. Shortcomings in the intelligence coordination…. Impossible to join the dots.. who could have thought?.. Yaaa!

Afghanistan – Tortured, mutilated and dead, sure they were terrorists… war is shit… but we will get Ben Laden, one day….Pledges for reconstruction… well, pledged…. Great opium harvest, and a fine crop of war lords to set the course to Freedom…Yaaa!

Iraq – Didn’t say it was directly connected to 9/11 but…… It’s connected to terror now…… (Best training camp in the world and we need a terrorist enemy don’t we!) Defend America….. WMD….. but, Damn those shortcomings in intelligence …. Yaaa!

Climate change – What? Forget it. It’s not science….. Kyoto… nice temples! Hurricanes are natural….. So sea levels rise…. Yaa!

Hurricane Katrina – A little late out of the blocks, but hey we got there…. FEMA could have done better but they learned from their mistakes…… Who could have imagined… Deaths not avoided are very regrettable… Aaron Brousard, of Jefferson Parish is quite out of place calling it MURDER (http://talkleft.com/new_archives/012127.html)….

The good side, Patriot Act, and Armed Federal Troupes, under Federal orders inside States…. your nearly there. Federal/Trade deficit…. but Haliburton is all go. Hail Fuehrer Bush!!!

I would be surprised if you make it to 2006/8 without killing each other in the streets, not that the political non-events of those years will matter much. The next disaster is coming soon. As a country you will suffer from your government, your priorities, and your ego.

Washington 24/9 – is a start!

My prayers, compassion, and hopes are with you, The people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re: Misplaced Faith in Election System
Posted by: Catherine a on Sep 9, 2005 2:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ritter is naive in placing so much faith in an election system that is broken. Rigging is commonplace by both main parties and it goes back many decades. Neither Dems or Reps want anyone to look too closely at those voting machines. Corporate finance of election campaigns means our representatives have been well and truly bought off long before they're elected. Even Nader particpated in--and endorsed--a sham of a recount in NH where there was NO chain of custody of ballots, yet he said we should accept the results because the NH Secretary of State is a good guy and we should all trust him.

Ritter's right that Katrina is a major wake-up call to all americans, and a call to pay attention to what is happening in our government. He's also right that participation in elections will be crucial to bring about change.

What Ritter misses is any concept of how broken our election system currently is. There is a yawning chasm of an information gap.

I hope Ritter and others will pay attention to the information and investigations provided by non-partisan groups such as VotersUnite.org, BlackBoxVoting.org; read books like "Votescam;" and support organizations devoted to campaign finance reform. Only then can american citizens hope to restore a semblance of democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IMPEACH the WHOLE LOT!!!!!!!
Posted by: Scott on Sep 9, 2005 4:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ANY MAN that stays on VACATION for a week before a major storm hits the U.S. needs to be IMPEACHED.... THAT is the only reasonable response we need to this!!!!!!!!!!! Nothing more, nothing less!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LIfe as an American
Posted by: gallee on Sep 9, 2005 6:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a long standing observer of USA politics I cannot believe that what I read on Alternet comment can be representitive of the average American.
Has no one got a good word to say about any part of your administration, your capitalist society, your Country indeed?
Here in the Uk we have long been led to understand that you enjoy the highest standard of living in the world.
Forgive me, but why are you all so seemingly dissatisfied with life?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LIfe as an American Posted by: mochajava13
» RE: LIfe as an American Posted by: gallee
» RE: LIfe as an American Posted by: mochajava13
» RE: LIfe as an American Posted by: gallee
» RE: LIfe as an American Posted by: MzMerlin
» RE: LIfe as an American Posted by: johnny-boy2
» Are you joking??? Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: Are you joking??? Posted by: johnny-boy2
» There in the UK Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: LIfe as an American Posted by: trukman
» RE: LIfe as an American Posted by: gallee
» RE: LIfe as an American Posted by: trukman
» Thanks for your Post Gallee! Posted by: johnny-boy2
plunger
Posted by: plunger on Sep 10, 2005 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After the hurricane passed New Orleans and the levees broke, flooding the city, it became increasingly evident that disaster response efforts were badly bogged down. Justice Department lawyers, who were receiving harrowing reports from the area, considered whether active-duty military units could be brought into relief operations even if state authorities gave their consent - or even if they refused.

The issue of federalizing the response was one of a number of legal issues considered in a flurry of meetings at the Justice Department, the White House and other agencies, administration officials said. Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales urged Justice lawyers to interpret the federal law creatively to assist local authorities. For example, federal prosecutors prepared to expand their enforcement of some criminal statutes like anti-carjacking laws that can be prosecuted by either state or federal authorities.

On the issue of whether the military could be deployed without the invitation of state officials, the Office of Legal Counsel, the unit within the Justice Department that provides legal advice to federal agencies, concluded that the federal government did possess authority to move in even over the objection of local officials.

Th[e Insurrection Act] was last invoked in 1992 for the Los Angeles riots, but at the request of Gov. Pete Wilson of California, and bhas not been invoked over a governor's objections since the civil rights era - and before that, to the time of the Civil War, according to administration officials. Bush administration, Pentagon and senior military officials warned that such an extreme measure would have serious legal and political implications.

Excuse me? What legal implications? Blanco said "give me everything you got." The Insurrection Act was invoked in 1992!!! This was not a novel legal issue. This was settled. What is was about was politics.

"Political implications." That drove them. States rights again. Who gives a shit about political implications when people are dying? The Bush Administration, that's who. So there you have it. The real story of the failures of BushCo in the Katrina Aftermath.

http://dailykos.com/story/2005/9/8/234931/8653

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHEN IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS
Posted by: RogerARTcom on Sep 10, 2005 3:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHEN IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS

IT BECOMES NECESSARY for the PEOPLE of the United States

TO ALTER or ABOLISH the United States Government

as it exists in the year 2001 / 02 / 03 / 04 / 05 / 06

Using the Authority, Law, and Intentions of the Constitution

and the Declaration of Independence.
.

And Now the People Step Forward

and Charge High Treason,
.

and Show that Democracy in its roots today,

is Corrupt.
.

And that the Constitution has been Altered and Betrayed

in Favor of A Small Group of Millionaires,
.

Over Another...

the Governed,

the People of the United States.
.

And that the Election Process is UN-fair

and has been Overwhelmed

and Monopolized

by Millionaires

and their millions of dollars
.

Continued at

http://www.RogerART.com

Scroll Down till You see Yellow link to

( Re-Written ) Declaration of Independence

Thank You, Roger@RogerART.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too little, too late, by the complicit media
Posted by: shadow7 on Sep 10, 2005 5:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Monday morning quarterbacking won't bring back the dead. Lots of folks, including some of the long dead journalists on TV, are raising hell about the lies and distortions and self serving actions that have resulted in the devastation after Katrina. People are dead. Lives are broken. Communities are gone....and all because Bushco is in charge.

Where the hell was all the indignation in the lead up to war in Iraq? Where was any accountability? Where was the media? Why is no one in the media asking the important questions even now?

What if Bush had never been allowed to get away with his lies in the first place? What if all the people he killed were still alive? What if...?

Good read: SHAMING THE DEVIL:
CLICK HERE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr Ritter
Posted by: drarnall on Sep 10, 2005 7:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A true patriot who once again speaks truth to the lie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REMEMBER THE SIXTIES?
Posted by: cee on Sep 10, 2005 7:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is needed now is for Bush and Co. is to show the same integrity that they show in Japan , when a civil servant so completely fails the citizens that rely on their leadership...Yes they commit Hari Kari....Or is his life more precious than those of the children...that never had a chance...
We now know...as the President and his cronies probably knew, that NO was largely inhabitated by poor people with lousy paying jobs(oil companies).
The Republicans kept cutting funding for the levees, knowing there wasn't a big enough tax base to sustain the infracstructure...let alone maintaining crews, that would come from G-d knows where, to do the evacuating....
WHAT AMERICA NEEDS NOW IS A GOOD OLD FASHION MARCH ON WASHINGTON...NOT JUST AN ANTI WAR MARCH.......NO!!!...WHAT WE NEED IS FOR 100'S OF 1000'S OF AMERICANS TO MARCH ON WASHINGTON TO TELL CONGRESS WE WANT A SPECIAL ELECTION TO VOTE OUT BUSH , CHENEY, DELAY, AND FRIST... AND LET'S DO IT BY ONE MAN ONE VOTE...NO MACHINES...NO SUPREME COURT...
IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THE DEMS ARE GOING TO HELP US...SO WE NEED THE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS AND AS MANY PEOPLE AS WE CAN GET TO SHOW THEM WHOS IN CHARGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Non-US View of the Mainstream Media
Posted by: trukman on Sep 11, 2005 3:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The opening title of a renowned UK based journalist's website spells out a screaming truth: " It is not enough for journalists to see themselves as mere messengers without understanding the hidden agendas of the message and myth that surround it" - John Pilger.

Needless to say British Broadcasters are loath to air his documentary journalism, and if so, usually, only late at night for minimum effect.

He is well known in the UK for his outspoken critisism of corrupt, and self serving Governments, corporate power, and the adverse effects of globalisation. Because he is not afraid to ask the hard questions.

There are many such journalists in the US and elsewhere, but unfortunately it would seem that they do not have the same sway as Pilger. I base this assumption on the comments and posts on this site in particular.

You all may have heard of Matt Taibbi a NY based journalist for AlterNet and NY Press. He published an article entitled "Shovelling Coal For Satan" in which he spells out exactly the mindset of mainstream journalism, well worth reading and may give some hope to truthful journalism.

That said it is fact that there are journalists who ask the hard questions. The problem is, they are not allowed to print or air the truth to the population in general. We have to read it in the excellent Independent Media sites such as this. Problem is, not everyone has access. Pity.

Most sane people rely on these journalists along with authortitave commentators such as Scott Ritter to at least attempt to reveal the truth. Vilification demonisation and harrassment usually follow these individuals but at least they have sown the seeds for the pursuit of truth. Why else have we read his article? And it seems obvious by the content of the postings and comments that most can relate to his views. We must not let them down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Buyer's Remorse
Posted by: pturet on Sep 11, 2005 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The national government response to the ongoing Hurricane Katrina tragedy should come as no surprise to those who paid the least bit of attention to the presidential campaigns and previous writings of George W. Bush. We have exactly what he has promised all along: the deconstruction and neglect of infrastructure, the reallocation of resources toward the wealthy classes and away from working people. The real majority has now got to wake up and understand that we have exactly what we paid for in the current administration. It's not a question of having to read the fine print. It was out there for all to see. If we'd only pay attention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yeah, but...
Posted by: gltirebiter on Sep 11, 2005 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this so-called electorate doesn't seem to share a teaspoon full of brains. fat chance of any real reform. we have lost this country and everything every soldier in our history thought he or she was fighting for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: yeah, but... Posted by: fairleft
class war for a multicultural elite
Posted by: fairleft on Sep 11, 2005 7:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To win the class war we must fight purely a class war. That means throwing over the side all the unfairness of racial, ethnic and gender preference. United we may win, divided we've fail again and again over the last 25 years. If you cannot make the right choice, you are an ally of the elite who run things down and scavenge for the rich and their corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If we could all get together and burn a Bush
Posted by: lc on Sep 12, 2005 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pot raises Consciousness. Nothing to Fear but the TRUTH!

I am a ‘hemp’ activist in my 60’and have smoked pot my entire adult life. Pot’s greatest danger is to the power’s that be. Pot expands consciousness, opens parts of the brain not normally used, makes people think deeper about any subject and, horror of horrors, pot inspires people to question authority.
No one ever comes out and says I use cocaine or heroine and it should be legal. No one advocates for any drug except the herb, cannabis. It takes real balls to use a drug and then to tell the government they are wrong about anything. Only pot inspires such reactions. Truth is the government’s greatest fear and pot is the only drug that inspires rebellion in the name of truth. That is why the government directs over 90% of its anti-drug message against the least harmful drug of all, least harmful to the user but most harmful to the deceiver’s ulterior motives, the true agenda the government hides from its citizens. "War" of any kind is the warning flag citizens should first recognize as just another government deception. For Christians to rally for War is certainly the sign of the Anti-Christ in action.
Sincerely, Ron Linker

www.HydroGen1000.com fuel cell technology to increase mpg, hp and reduce pollution. Available now to convert your vehicle to a hybrid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jlrichardson@cox.net
Posted by: JLRichardson on Sep 13, 2005 10:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After Katrina, the lies about Iraq and the impending war with Iran and Venezuela the only thing to do next year is to stomp the Republican Party out of existence. Every single Republican and Democrat who supported this illegal and immoral war should be removed from office. It must be demonstrated to politicians that the price of lying to the American people is political oblivion. We must stomp the life out of the Republcan Party in Nov. 2006 and teach them a lesson that will never be forgotten. Democrats can draw their own conclusions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jlrichardson@cox.net Posted by: johnny-boy2
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement