Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Long Emergency Ahead

By James Howard Kunstler, AlterNet. Posted September 8, 2005.


Will New Orleans and the devastated region around it be rebuilt on the hollow premise of Cheap Oil?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by James Howard Kunstler

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When Hurricane Katrina swept through New Orleans and the Gulf Coast two weeks ago, a lot of the delusions cherished by the American public about the kind of nation we are becoming were washed away. The inhabitants of a region nearly the size of Italy now face real hardship and the loss of all their presumed entitlements to a way of life that is supposed to be non-negotiable. The weather has negotiated for them, and everyone else in the nation is feeling the effects at the gas pumps that rule our lives.

People often ask me why we are getting such poor leadership on the issues that comprise the Long Emergency, as I have called the difficulties advanced civilizations face in the decades ahead. Specifically, why haven't President Bush or the leaders of the Democratic opposition uttered a word about our extreme car dependency?

The answer, I think has to do with the nature of our economy. The dirty secret of the American economy for at least a decade now is that it has come to be based on the creation of suburban sprawl and the activities associated with it -- the building of cul-de-sac McMansions, highway retail pods, car sales, real estate sales, the creation of false liquidity in the form of easy mortgages and the deployment of that debt into tradable instruments. The sprawl-building industry comprises over 40 percent of what we do in this country. If you subtract it from the U.S. economy, there isn't much left besides hair cutting and open heart surgery.

Our leaders don't have the courage to tell us that we can't continue to live this way, because too many jobs, incomes, and votes would have to go with it. They may not have the courage to even face the facts themselves. They may be hostages -- like most other Americans -- to the belief that a drive-in society is the only conceivable way to live, or the best, or simply normative.

The suburban project, which has preoccupied us since the end of the Second World War, can be seen now in light of the gathering global energy predicament as the greatest misallocation of resources in the history of the world. Having put so much of our post-war wealth into this massive infrastructure for daily living, we are captives of it, subject to a corrosive psychology of previous investment, which does not permit us to imagine letting go of this way of life, or even reforming it.

Vice-President Dick Cheney's declaration that this way of life is "not negotiable" is a prime symptom of this collective psychology. With the city of New Orleans now being drained, proposals for rebuilding it are flying around the noosphere. Daniel Libeskind, the cutting-edge starchitect whose proposal for turning the former World Trade Center site into the set for a German expressionist movie won the hearts and minds of New York City planning officials, has proposed that New Orleans should be rebuilt into a Jazz theme park. Apart from the fatuousness of this idea, I'd have to simply wonder at the economic assumption that cheap airfares and motor tourism will remain at the heart of any region's economy in an energy-scarce future

More sensible proposals will be made by the New Urbanists, leading proponents for walkable neighborhoods and compact development -- which is, in fact, consistent with the original template for most of the neighborhoods ruined by floods. This means sticking to an interconnected street-and-block system, normal urban building lots, and a menu of building types consistent with the history and scale of the place. This is really not a tough assignment to either understand or execute, but if the so-called production home builders come on to the scene, they may wreak a new kind of havoc with their mostly suburban standards and practices.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

James Howard Kunstler is a regular contributor to Orion magazine, Mother Jones, The Atlantic Monthly, and is the author of "The Long Emergency" (Atlantic Monthly Press). He drives a 1992 Toyota pickup truck, when he drives at all.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
No imagination and a major disconnect
Posted by: beetruetoyou on Sep 8, 2005 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would seem that the failure of our leaders is not only a lack of imagination but a clear disconnect from the lives most of us live. Do you ever remember hearing this administration even mention the word poverty in the past six years?...other than Barbara saying the other day when visiting a shelter "most of these people are under-priveledged anyway so.... chuckle, chuckle, ...this is working very well for them." The reality is the leaders in our country grew up and live in a completely different world than most of us. That's why we've got to get Barak running for 08!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rebuilding New Orleans
Posted by: dkm on Sep 8, 2005 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read an analysis that seems to me to be spot on. New Orleans will have to be rebuilt because the port is just too important to the whole Mississippi River basin, i.e., the whole Midwest, to be allowed to disappear. That means that there will have to be a city to support the people working at the port.

Having said that, there will have to be changes in how the city is built just because something like Katrina is due to happen again and yet again. When the Mississippi from North Dakota on down flooded over a decade ago, people along the banks realized that building in the flood plain was not a good idea and also that redirecting the river to suit human desires was unsustainable. Then the decisions were made to redirect building to areas not susceptible to flooding and in general, work with the river and not against it. The same philosophy will have to be followed in rebuilding New Orleans. The wetlands and barrier islands that have been destroyed by developers will need to be replaced. Lowlying areas will have to be left undeveloped. Other changes will have to be made in the system of levees and flood control construction. The situation is not quite analagous to the Dutch fight against the North Sea because the North Sea does not lay down a new bed year after year requiring continual raising of the barriers the way the Mississippi does. Eventually the levees will just be too high. There must be other problems that hydrologists and ecologists will have to work with, but the basic principle that we have to change our methods, as suggested in the article, is obvious.

Focusing on New Orleans has the disadvantage that we forget that a whole coastline was damaged. Katrina will happen again, and in rebuilding everywhere, this must be taken into account. Accept that if you build in a low area or on a barrier island, you will be wiped out. So don't build where you shouldn't. Don't destroy the things (wetlands, barrier islands) that protect you. Build with, not against, Mother Nature. Accept that we live in a reality based world and that it only takes one bad throw of the dice to lose, but a continual run of good throws to win, which means that gambling is a loser's game. The house, Mother Nature, always wins.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hopeless
Posted by: JohnnyM on Sep 8, 2005 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right from Day 2 of this disaster, after seeing the magnitude and reactions, it was clear to me, living in Canada, that this could very easily be the beginning-of-the-end of the "empire."

As the leader of the world, economically, militaristically, etc., the USA has been a joke - why do think so many of the best comedians come from Canada - we sit back, and we laugh. Well, there is no joke in this latest snafu.

And unfortuantely my government has allowed your corporations to take over most of our sucecess stories, which means we will slide right down with you. Probably before you as you first pull the plug on your satellite offices here.

But we cannot point the finger at individuals, though Dubya deserves the lack of leadership label. The problems, as you have pointed out, are systemic. Since so many individuals out there buy into the system, and are trained and groomed by their mentors on how to "work" the system, I feel it is hopeless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» w support in canada? Posted by: beetruetoyou
» Nationalism Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Nationalism Posted by: demidesigrrl
» RE: Nationalism Posted by: bogey11
» RE: Nationalism Posted by: cyclone
» Your great big economy? Posted by: Olympiada
Penny wise, but pound foolish
Posted by: Kevin R. Hoskins on Sep 8, 2005 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One point that nobody seems to be making is this: if our worthless government had spent the money to improve the levees and prepare for hurricanes in the first place, the Katrina disaster would have been far less severe and would have had a much smaller overall economic impact. But, of course, the government has to squander hundreds of billions of dollars taking care of this country's needy upper classes and start wars that facilitate an increase in corporate welfare (see "taking care of this country's needy upper classes"). The rich continue to get richer and the poor (middle class) continue to get poorer, and the aftermath of Katrina is only going to accelerate this trend.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Time For A Return to FDR Emergency Mobilization"
Posted by: sheila_jones1007@sbcglobal.net on Sep 8, 2005 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
September 8, 2005

Clearly, America and the world is on the brink of a cultural-political-economic "paradigm shift". The past 40 years of shareholder's values, derived from the free-trade feeding frenzy of "profit over people" turned America's "Tsumami called Katrina" into a "man-assisted catastrophe." The Baby Boomer generation (of which I am ) fear and rage against a physical-economic production-oriented society into the impotent service-oriented society, blue-collar employment vs white-collar employment sanctioned and implemented the take-down of capital-investment into basic infrastructure; basic preventative health care-services for the lower 80% of the income bracket of the population and an orientation to environmentalism, away from taming Nature. The disappearance in infrastructure has set the stage for "ghost towns" in America, with the horrible vision of nomads, displaced, disillusioned and unskilled.
Being from Chicago, an historic site giving testimony to the power of engineering science and technology's ability to tame Nature and wastelands and marshes for the livability of people, it's time we end the Cheney-Bush-neo-con Mission of purging the lessons and methods of Franklin Delano Roosevelt experienced during the last great Depression. We are beyond a Depression now. We're in a economic meltdown, with Katrina either unleasing the closing phase of life as we know it in America, or serving to bring we, American Baby Boomers to our senses.
Sincerely, Sheila Anne Jones. Chicago, Illinois.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» AGREE 10000% Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: AGREE 10000% Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: AGREE 10000% Posted by: sheila_jones1007@sbcglobal.net
Eminent Domain
Posted by: Artkansas on Sep 8, 2005 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll be willing to bet that the recent ruling on eminent domain will get a torture test in the aftermath of Katrina.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I wish it were so.... Posted by: Michiganman
Trapped in a box
Posted by: crz53 on Sep 8, 2005 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never cease to be amazed at the inability of most people to see the world beyond face value. They simply assume that the way things are is the way they've always been, and it's the only way things should be. We're not that far removed a pre-suburban society. Yet many Americans simply can't imagine not hopping in the car to drive where ever, when ever. It's as if they're trapped on the inside of a mirrored box. The problem is not that they can't think "outside" the box, but rather that they can't even concieve of the notion that they're in a box at all. Everywhere they look is just a reflection of themselves that seems to go on forever. As a result of this, I don't know that any amount of education is going to work on our lobotomized countrymen (and women). I think the only thing that will shake America from its slumber is a head on collison with an uncooperative and unfriendly future. The irony is that once we get to that point, it will be too late to do anything about it.
- Mike Lorenz

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Trapped in a box Posted by: bogey11
» RE: Trapped in a box Posted by: Basenjis
A different model for communities.
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Sep 8, 2005 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During the late 1960s I had the extreme good fortune to live just outside of Paris. It happened to be the biggest and oldest house I have ever lived in. One wall of that house had the neighbors garage attached directly to it, sandwiched together much more closely than anything you'd see here.

There was a train station about 2 blocks away and there were several ways to get into the heart of the city for about the equivalent of one dollar. My brother and I were in the boy scouts and had meetings in the embassy. Occasionally, my father would drive to one of these meetings from wherever he might have been. If we had purchased round trip tickets, we'd go ahead and take the train home - and always arrive before my father in the car.

It always seemed such an easy thing to walk two blocks, get on a train and go - yet such an ordeal to drive into the city and park somewhere. And the trains ran until 2:00 AM or a little later. I can remember taking the last train and getting off just after 2:30.

In another direction, there was a grocer about two blocks away, just a little farther was a butcher, bakery, wine shop, florist, etc. We walked to these places, and went every day or two to the grocer and bakery. The biggest reason that my mother ever walked was because we lived on a one-way street and the grocery was towards the other way. Often I was sent alone to fetch something for dinner.

As a child (12 - 15 while there) I was more mobile than my parents in some ways, even though they each had cars. They never took the train unless my brother or I were with them, mostly because they hardly bothered to get past the language barrier. Along the way, you could switch to other modes of transportation at a couple of points. Or if I was ambitious I could walk for 30 minutes to a Metro (subway) station in Boulogne Billancourt and spend just 30 cents.

To this day I prefer to live 'in town', whereas my parents prefer to live 10 miles out of a tiny town and 60 miles from the city they visit at least twice a week to get anything special. Up until six or eight years ago, there was a grocery and drugstore just half a mile from my house and I occasionally walked. I lament their closings - now I have to drive to go after anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Methane
Posted by: hhartman on Sep 8, 2005 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now, I am no chemist, but I recall how my chemistry teacher in high school told my class about how he had rigged his house in such a way that it was self sustaining. How was it self sustaining, one might ask. Methane is a by product of human waist, as many know from the tales of lighting farts. My question is how when we shoudl have the systems in place to collect "natural gas", we are dependent on the Gulf of Mexico?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Methane Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Methane Posted by: Xynyx
» Humor, a natural defense Posted by: Michiganman
The Long Emergency & Global Warming
Posted by: decembrist on Sep 8, 2005 11:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Global Warming is like the giant penguin in the closet. Everybody knows about it, 95% of scientists agreet that it is happening and because of human activity... yet we bob along like the ship of fools.

The most important thing about global warming is that we don't know what it will do - except bury coastal cities under seawater, that is. Will current agricultural areas be subsumed by desert? Will the ocean currents shut down and throw the world's weather into chaos? shit, nobody knows. This means that places like Phoenix and Las Vegas cannot depend on any future at all... and coastal cities can pretty much kiss their kitchy waterfronts goodbye!

What's crazy is that a big reason global warming is happening is because of personal transportation! Just to get your ass from A to B, quickly, and with your pick of radio station, is costing the world the ability to rely on stable climate patterns.

Here are some great and recent articles on global warming:


Bill McKibben

The Increase of Global Catastrophes

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I hear you Decemberist Posted by: Olympiada
The choo choo train
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 8, 2005 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like your writing James! You're cool! You manage to be funny and serious, quite serious, at the same time. very creative.

your article alarmed the heck out of me. Lord, have mercy, I am scared. I do feel like crying like a baby. Despite my new influx of theology I am back to my pre-Christian environmental apocalypism...(Is that a word?)

Really, the situation looks very very very bleak.

Now I do not drive, do not own, walk and bike everywhere...but I live in the 'suburbs' so to speak and do not grow my own food nor pump my own water and have a young child, so I am just as vulnerable as the rest. I do not like these times at all. They make my 'survivalist' instincts rear their head...

I do feel like holding on to a teddy bear and crawling under the covers. These are frightening times.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Price of Poor Choices
Posted by: Basenjis on Sep 8, 2005 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So few of our political figures are acquainted with how the other half lives. It's no wonder so many well-fed, well-heeled in positions of great power , simply can't relate to poverty and deprivation. Does anyone remember that Dennis Kucinich, former democratic candidate for president, once, for lack of a roof over his head, lived for awhile in the family car? It's less than likely Dennis Kucinich has a problem relating to the New Orleans experience. Bob Graham, respected US senator and two-term governor of Florida took once-a-month jobs such as garbage collector, farmer, school teacher or day laborer throughout his working career so as to keep in touch with the people? Can we doubt that Gov. Graham had insights into the lives of working people that few anywhere can match? And General Wesley Clark, with his successful military leadership background and his middle class beginnings, his war experiences-- is it likely he would have plunged us into this hellish war that has cost us such mindless destruction of lives and property and has emptied the country of the needed resources to handle a genuine national emergency? Yet, these people of uniquely American experiences were passed right over for what we are left with--a scion of a wealthy family of mediocre intelligence and less than mediocre accomplishments elevated to the highest office in the most powerful country in the world. We had choices, but lacked common sense in our choices. Ergo: we are paying the price.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The strength of people
Posted by: Michiganman on Sep 8, 2005 3:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must agree with olympiada that these are very disturbing times. The dark clouds seem to be on the horrizon. But as I've said many times we must not now be the United States of Amnesia. Let's remember the great depression, a horrible blow to humankind. At that time there was no previous precedent for government intervention in regards to poverty. The well off scoffed while families starved in the streets. Common people pulled together and shared what little they had, all(most) saw the suffering of the other and was touched to pitch in and help each other. There was NO other way. This experience and attitude allowed a man like Franklin Delano Roosevelt (I choke up when I hear his name) become president and transform what had been a greedy corporate loving government to be torn apart and reformed into a government that had respect and compassion for it's people. Many of his programs which put people to work and fed many millions of hungry babies were called leftist, not to mention communistic. But there would be no extinguishing the fire he started showing that when common man took control of government and pulled together, for the good of humanity, anything could be accomplished. He and people of like mind pulled this country out of a deep depression caused by junk bonds and corporate greed. Perhaps we must sink to this level again before people will wake up and realize the mess we are in. But make no mistake,we will help each other and make it through. When suffering reaches the level where we are all on the same playing field people will realize this is the only way. It's a shame it has to come to this and I hope it doesn't but it will,in the end, build a stronger america. POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We are an internet family Posted by: Olympiada
» Depression take # 2 Posted by: Falang
Right-wing media now praising price gouging
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 8, 2005 7:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» It's the market as master. Posted by: Sojourner
mtlaurel
Posted by: mtlaurel on Jan 27, 2006 3:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am new to this site. Amazing what can be found while following one's nose thru the internet maze. Loved "trapped in a box". Olympiada, take care of yourself. You are a very caring person and you're going thru a tough time, and yes it can color your overall mood. When I focus too much on serious topics, I can feel myself getting too gloomy, and then it"s time for a good funny book or movie or a walk in the outdoors, or best of all a visit with friends of family and no discussion of the tough topics. A wise person has said all our worry or feeling bad about anything cant make it better, so we do need to take care of our emotional being just as we must take care of our physical being. We have a right to be happy and can only do the best we can with everything else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]