Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Iraq 100, Louisiana 8

By Will Bunch, Attytood. Posted September 7, 2005.


In April 2004, some of the best minds who were supposed to be studying and improving Lousiana's damaged wetlands instead found themselves in the Persian Gulf -- restoring the Iraqi marshes.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Will Bunch

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Is it possible to actually quantify how screwed up the priorities of the Bush cabal in Washington have been? Usually not. But when it comes to the issue of wetlands -- the natural buffer that could have protected New Orleans against a deadly storm surge liked the one that essentially wiped out the city last week -- the answer is "yes."

In 2004 -- at a time when George W. Bush was running for re-election and presumably courting votes in Louisiana, a potential swing state -- the White House proposed spending a whopping 12 1/3 times as much taxpayer money restoring wetlands in southern Iraq as he planned to spend on the same task in the Mississippi Delta.

Before Congress intervened, the Bush administration asked for $100 million to restore the Iraqi marshlands, drained and destroyed by Saddam Hussein, to its status as -- according to legend -- the Biblical "Garden of Eden."

The proposed funding that year for the Louisiana wetlands, heavily damaged by overdevelopment, was just $8 million. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, the city once buffered by those disappearing wetlands is now Hell on Earth.

Even though the Iraq wetlands project didn't get the federal dollars, it did get the next best thing: American know-how. And so some of the best minds who were supposed to be studying and improving Lousiana's environment instead found themselves in the Persian Gulf. This is from an April 24, 2004, article in the New Orleans Times-Picayune:

Corps officials involved in restoring Louisiana's wetlands also have been sent to assist those fighting in and rebuilding Iraq, including oversight of a similar wetlands restoration project there, he said. Ed Theriot, a Vicksburg-based engineer who had directed the Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration Study, was sent to Iraq four months ago to oversee the restoration of the "Garden of Eden" wetlands at the mouth of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers that were destroyed by Saddam Hussein in the 1990s.
While Theriot was pulled away from his work in the New Orleans area, his work in Baghdad was deemed highly successful.

Despite a balking Congress, the Bush administration seemed determined to fund the Iraqi marsh project -- pardon the awful pun -- come hell or high water, even if foreign allies had to pay for it. USA Today reported:
The United States, Italy, Canada and others are offering aid to Iraq for marshland restoration. They also are offering expertise to maximize the chances of successfully returning the marshlands to their previous state. U.S. officials estimate that 25% to 35% of the marshes can be restored in two to three years.
In his $20.3 billion request for rebuilding Iraq, President Bush asked for $100 million to restore the marshes, but Congress cut it entirely, along with some other programs. Officials remain confident, however, that they can transfer the money from elsewhere to pay for the restoration.
"We need to restore the marshes," says Andrew Natsios, administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Indeed, the project did eventually get major funding from Japan -- roughly $11 million -- and from Italy, some $1.3 million. Nothing wrong with that, although it does seem ironic in the wake of Bush's refusal to accept foreign aid last week to help out folks in Louisiana.

For years, federal officials have been warned that the lost of wetlands had made New Orleans more vulnerable to a hurricane than when Betsy struck the region in 1965.
Sidney Coffee, executive assistant to the governor for coastal activities, said about 1,900 square miles of wetlands have disappeared from the area since the 1930s, and the receding continues at a rate of about 24 square miles per year. The erosion has a direct impact on New Orleans' ability to absorb the blow of a storm like Katrina, she said. For every 2.7 miles of wetlands, storm surges are reduced by about 1 foot, she said.
Now, it's fair to note that even a massive influx of federal dollars in fiscal 2005 would not have brought back the wetlands in time for Katrina, a supposed once-in-a-lifetime event. Nor are we denying that the destruction of the Iraqi marches was a global environmental travesty. But once again, it's the priorities that show how screwed up the Bush administration truly is. Clearly, the White House had no concept of fiscal constraint when it came to throwing literally tens of millions of dollars at any problem in Iraq, 7,000 miles away. Apparently that's easy to do when you have $192 billion -- and counting -- to burn.

It was only here in America, on domestic programs, that the budget bean counters held sway. And now New Orleans -- a beloved American city that once truly was a garden of earthly delights -- has become a living hell.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Will Bunch is a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News and author of the blog Attytood.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What???
Posted by: Iana_gheddis on Sep 7, 2005 6:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How come before Katrina, the people in Iraq were loser idiots who were only there because they couldn't find a job in the U.S. because the greedy big businesses were outsourcing everything.

The people of New Orleans wantied a liberal loser hack for a mayor, they got what they had coming.

Maybe at the next election, they'll find a Rudy. A strong mayor doesn't need the federal government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What??? Posted by: bogey11
» RE: What??? Posted by: Iana_gheddis
» RE: What??? Posted by: bogey11
» RE: What??? Posted by: Wacre
» RE: What??? Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: What??? Posted by: owlbear1
» RE: What??? Posted by: Iana_gheddis
» RE: What??? Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: What??? Posted by: bogey11
» RE: What??? Posted by: frost
» RE: What??? Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: What??? Posted by: Prometheus
» RE: What??? Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: What??? Posted by: Wacre
» RE: What??? Posted by: drmeow
» RE: What??? Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: What??? Posted by: Cayenne
» RE: What??? Posted by: KarenS
Irq 100, Louisiana 8
Posted by: hirondelle on Sep 7, 2005 6:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will Bunch is missing the point; America is not rebuilding the Iraqui marshes out of the goodness of its heart, this country never does anything for strictly altruistic reasons. It's not obvious yet, but there is something that speaks to American interests for us to be there.

Maybe....maybe...could it be that we've just bombed the rest of their country to hell and back? Naw, we don't care about that. Maybe we are just trying to make some friends over there so it'll be easier when they realise we are going to hang around awhile?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: bogey11
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: bogey11
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: bogey11
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: bogey11
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: bogey11
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: bogey11
» RE: Irq 100, Louisiana 8 Posted by: johnny-boy2
Jedi
Posted by: pmorgan on Sep 7, 2005 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Much as I regret our national failure to restore the marshes along the Gulf Coast, it was definitely worth doing to restore the marshes in Iraq, which were destroyed to punish the marsh dwellers' insurrection against Saddam.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jedi Posted by: Lizmv
» Restore the marshes in Iraq Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: restore the marshes in Iraq Posted by: Prometheus
» I found humor in that too! Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: I found humor in that too! Posted by: Prometheus
» How far our society has come? Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: How far our society has come? Posted by: Prometheus
» robbing Akmed to pay Abdul Posted by: Olympiada
» Sorry, I ran out of space Posted by: Habaro
» Childish country Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Childish country Posted by: Habaro
Incompetent
Posted by: Sandra on Sep 7, 2005 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What can you say other than this president and his adminstration are incompetent?The people who are put in charge of various agencies and departments are cronies and neocons. The only thing that they do well is line the pockets of the rich, at any cost to the country and our people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Incompetent Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Incompetent Posted by: Maryanne
» RE: Incompetent Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Incompetent Posted by: Maryanne
» RE: Incompetent Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Incompetent Posted by: Maryanne
» RE: Incompetent Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: Incompetent Posted by: jwg
krose
Posted by: krose on Sep 7, 2005 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I HAVE COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE INCOMPETENT BUSH ADMINISTRATION PAYS A BUNCH OF "LOSERS" TO SIT BY THESE LIBERAL BLOGS, AND THEN "POUNCE," AS SOON AS A POST COMES OUT, TO BE THE FIRST TO WRITE SOME MORONIC COMMENT, NO MATTER WHAT IT SAYS, AS LONG AS IT IS PRO-BUSH!!! SINCE THESE COMMENTS ARE USUALLY SO STUPID, I WOULD NOT EVEN BE SURPRISED IF THESE BUSH "HACKS" WERE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, ONE OF THE BUSH TRICKS FOR SOLVING THE CHEAP LABOR PROBLEM!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: krose Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: krose Posted by: drmeow
» RE: krose Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: krose Posted by: beetruetoyou
» RE: krose Posted by: Wacre
7,000 miles and counting
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 7, 2005 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess the Iraqi marshes hold more status because
1. They are more visible to the world.
2. They are the historic 'garden of Eden', although I thought according to the African Heritage Study Bible, they were farther south.
3. Perhaps Bush has a conscience and wants to show to the world he feels remorse? Nah, I know you all would disagree with that.

But seriously, intuitively speaking, I knew it was the destruction of the environment that was behind this great catastrophe in part. Now atheists, bear with me, it is not my intention to offend. Being a Theist, I believe an Intelligence Being created this globe. So, this Intelligent Being, God, created ecosystems, which includes marshes to buffer the coasts from hurricanes. Now granted, man created global warming, which conservatives will argue, that added to this Class 5 Hurricane. Man also destroyed the natural ecosystem.

Were there no environmental activists way back when New Orleans was being built? Is environmental activism really a sign of progress?

Unfortunately I do not know too much on the history of NO, all though Lindie was kind enough to educate me. Did they not have environmental impact plans back then?

Sheesh!

By the way, I like that word cabal. It's a new one for me. I have had to look up twice now...It is kind of hard for me to understand it in the context. I do not think Bush is usurping anything...it seems like things have been bad for a while!

Conservatives will probably argue with me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ridiculed and marginalized Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: 7,000 miles and counting Posted by: johnny-boy2
» Responsible criticism Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: 7,000 miles and counting Posted by: Cayenne
» Lord, have mercy Posted by: Olympiada
"Should We Call It 'New Baghdad' Now?"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Sep 7, 2005 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hurricane Katrina, a "once-in-a-lifetime" event? Not with global warming turning the Gulf into a bathtub; we're likely to be priveleged(!) to see many more than one "Katrina" in our lifetime, and much bigger, too. . .

How nice to know that Bush has a reciprocal arrangement with Iraq. He sent the expertise to restore New Orleans' protective wetlands over there, and in return, with the help of a hurricane, got something for us that Baghdad would rather not have: the living hell of massive urban destruction. Such a deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL Posted by: Olympiada
We Are Too Dumb to Wake Up
Posted by: MT512 on Sep 7, 2005 11:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I doubt Katrina disaster will act as anything close to a tipping point for Bush/Republicans/neocons. If they just focus the attention on all the bad traits of the victims (their "refusal" to evacuate before the storm, the violence, the looting, the holdouts, etc) and also on the evils of "big government" (FEMA is inept because big government is inept), then they just need to offer a couple of sacraficial lambs (FEMA's Brown and maybe Chertoff), and they may achieve a number of things:

1. Privatize FEMA and as much as they can of other agencies
2. Tear down the SuperDome and everything else to give Halliburton all the money to rebuild (and all the license to steal every penny they can in the process)
3. Divert mistrust/hatred of Bush to the failure of every local and state Democrat within blameshot

Hell, we already know that most of the ruined area will be rebuilt with luxury resorts, apartments and big gambling outlets.

I trust John Q. Public to finally wake up to this madness about as far as I can throw the Republican party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» John Q. Public Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: We Are Too Dumb to Wake Up Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: We Are Too Dumb to Wake Up Posted by: Tubeguru
» RE: We Are Too Dumb to Wake Up Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: We Are Too Dumb to Wake Up Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: We Are Too Dumb to Wake Up Posted by: johnny-boy2
» RE: We Are Too Dumb to Wake Up Posted by: johnny-boy2
» I am listening Posted by: Olympiada
Who was the chair of the RNC in 2000?
Posted by: sausage on Sep 7, 2005 12:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who was it who called global warming "junk science" and called for the U.S. to repudiate the Kyoto Treaty?

That Foghorn Leghorn impersonator, Governor Haley Barbour of Mississippi.

With that as a plank in the Republican Party's 2000 platform why would Bush and Co. even consider to restore the coastal saltwater marshlands. Hell's bells, wealthy, Republican-leaning Baby Boomers want to buy shore-front property and retire there. This Gulf Coast region is, or was, prime real estate. Why would anyone want to restore it just for a bunch of critters and birds?

And you know what, boy and girls! What has transpired along the Gulf Coast has not sunk into the rights' collective reactionary brain one wit.

They haven't learned a thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nice sense of humor sausage Posted by: Olympiada
» What about economy jb? Posted by: Olympiada
Again, Bush's Fault
Posted by: johnny-boy2 on Sep 7, 2005 2:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I notice there are alot of arm-chair quarterbacks on this blog. Ones who use hindsight to cricitize anything and everything the President does.

Want to know why this irks me? Here is valuable criticism that was needed months ago, but no one listened. Why? Because there are no more rational voices from the opposition for the President to listen to.

Sure he may catch a "we need to preserve the louisiana wetlands," in his daily readings....but how does he separate that from the "BUSH IS AN EVIL NEOCON NAZI KILLING IRAQI BABIES FOR OIL MONEY" hysterics that accompany said criticism?

The problem with you folks is this: you don't know how to control your emotions in debate, and as a result, no one listens to you. And the fact that no one listens to you seems to make you all more angry and emotional, and you all become further irrelevant.

This environmental stuff is y'alls bread and butter, but you couldn't present it to anyone in a responsible, reasonable manner.

Now you're using hindsight to say "look! we were right all along."

You may have been, but you guys (none of us really) did enough to push this important preservation agenda properly.

We all shoulder the blame for this one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» none of us really Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: none of us really Posted by: johnny-boy2
» Flames Posted by: Olympiada
Washington Post Vindicates President, Congress
Posted by: johnny-boy2 on Sep 8, 2005 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reporter Michael Grunwald, who did a major investigative series on the Army Corps of Engineers when the topic was anything but sexy, argues that Louisiana was on the high-list of receiving corps of engineering money. His front-page take on the Corps in Louisiana should have an effect on the post-Katrina conventional wisdom...

An excerpt:

"In Katrina's wake, Louisiana politicians and other critics have complained about paltry funding for the Army Corps in general and Louisiana projects in particular. But over the five years of President Bush's administration, Louisiana has received far more money for Corps civil works projects than any other state, about $1.9 billion; California was a distant second with less than $1.4 billion, even though its population is more than seven times as large. Much of that Louisiana money was spent to try to keep low-lying New Orleans dry. But hundreds of millions of dollars have gone to unrelated water projects demanded by the state's congressional delegation and approved by the Corps, often after economic analyses that turned out to be inaccurate."

Comments, discussion?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement