Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

American Labor's Rebirth

By Madeline Janis-Aparicio, AlterNet. Posted September 6, 2005.


In Los Angeles, as well as other cities across the country, a powerful new labor movement is emerging -- one that has already claimed a number of victories for working families.
Advertisement

Spurred on by rifts within the AFL-CIO, for the past six months pundits have been furiously writing obituaries for the American labor movement. But those seeking to administer organized labor's last rites should look again. In Los Angeles and other cities across the country, a powerful model is emerging that has already claimed a number of victories for working families.

At the core of this reinvigorated movement is an inclusive vision unifying working people, unions, communities, religious leaders and political leaders under the broad umbrella of economic fairness. There is also a strategic savvy capable of taking on multinational corporations with superior resources.

At the cutting edge of the new American labor movement is the city of Los Angeles, which over the past decade has generated a string of success stories. One of the first of these was the passage in 1997 of the city's living wage ordinance, which accelerated the enactment of similar legislation in cities around the country (more than 125 such laws are now on the books).

The living wage campaign in many ways embodied the new labor movement. It brought together an incredibly broad coalition, evoking images of the social movements of the 1960s with a mix of clergy, students, politicians and community leaders. The campaign was emblematic of the new labor movement in another way, too, merging policy, research, organizing and communications into a strategy that hit on multiple fronts at once.

In the years since the living wage victory, the Los Angeles labor movement has repeatedly used the formula of coalition-building and comprehensive campaigns to win major gains for working families. From the Justice for Janitors strike in 2000 to the landmark defeat of Wal-Mart's Inglewood ballot measure in 2004 to this year's dramatic victory for thousands of hotel workers, L.A. has proven that a big tent labor movement with a sophisticated strategy can challenge the growing epidemic of working poverty and the shrinking of the American middle class.

Los Angeles is not an isolated case. Earlier this year, San Diego -- historically a conservative city -- enacted far-reaching living wage legislation with the backing of a broad labor/community coalition. Similar coalitions have passed living wage laws in more than 10 California cities.

Meanwhile, community, labor and religious leaders have successfully united to block Wal-Mart's expansion into some of the largest urban markets in the country. Following the retail giant's rebuff in Inglewood, coalitions in both Chicago and New York shut down Wal-Mart's attempt to build massive supercenters, which replace middle-class jobs with poverty-wage jobs and decimate entire communities.

These impressive achievements come at a critical moment in American history. As the Bush administration vigorously pursues its conservative public policy agenda, it has become more and more clear that the interests of the majority of Americans are not being served by the administration's priorities. From tax cuts that impoverish needed government services to the privatization of Social Security, the Bush agenda is being revealed as one that benefits big business at the expense of the average working American.

Conservatives have sought to build a popular consensus around so-called "moral" issues in part to draw attention away from their blatantly anti-middle class and pro-business policies. By inflaming passions on divisive social issues like gay marriage and abortion, which threaten "traditional" social and religious values, they have obscured their own attempt to dismantle many of the "traditional" communal values that have undergirded American society since the New Deal.

The challenge of the labor movement is to unite Americans of all races, ages, regions and religions around a set of values that represent the good of the whole over the interests of the very few. This movement must be based on the priorities of economic fairness and security, which most Americans believe in. These priorities must be posed against the interests of the multinational corporations that are increasingly dominating both the American and global economies.

Economic fairness and security, broadly defined, refers to the ability of individuals to benefit from an economy in which people who work full time earn enough to raise their families, employees are treated with dignity and respect on the job, families have access to decent housing, clean air and water and quality healthcare, and there is equality of opportunity in all economic spheres.

These issues speak to all Americans and unite the majority in a community of interest. The evidence can be found in Los Angeles and other cities, which are breathing new life into the American labor movement and transforming the lives of working families.

Digg!

Madeline Janis-Aparicio is executive director of the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy, a nonprofit organization that helped lead the fight against Wal-Mart in Inglewood.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The labor movement is dying
Posted by: greenthinginwater on Sep 6, 2005 4:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not because they did not serve a purpose. They no longer are efficient and no longer serve a purpose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The labor movement is dying Posted by: greenthinginwater
» Not more important......... Posted by: Diecash1
But will hopefully resurrect...
Posted by: Steve on Sep 6, 2005 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Greenthing has a point, but it's been losing validity for several years now... There are issues with unions -- Sometimes perceived, sometimes actual corruption... Somtimes overzealous protection of members/workers who do not deserve protection simply for the sake of protecting them, while keeping unproductive members on company payrolls... And for a while, the need for unions may have been questionable...

However, corporate slobs like Walmart -- Other companies that off-shore or "right-shore" labor needs... Companies outsourcing or using part-time employment to dodge employee benefits... These companies are resurrecting the need for organized labor... Greenthing's reaction seems typical of these groups like Walmart -- If it's good for my bottom-line, and my shareholders, do it -- Regardless whether it's on the backs of my employees or the communities supporting me... What really cracks me up is that these folks like to pretend they're God-fearing "Christians"... Their morals show in their actions...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

....and Be a Counterforce to the Multinational Corporations
Posted by: needlefoot on Sep 6, 2005 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It will take time, but there will be a resurgence of the labor movement, and I believe that it will reach beyond American borders. It will have to if it is to be an effective counterforce to the multinational corporations.
In America we have given so much of our own economic security to accomodate the multinationals. These corporations are not particularly interested in my welfare or in yours, only in taking whatever they need to protect and increase their bottom lines. They will go wherever the pickings will be the best for them.
I'm not the brightest bulb on this planet, but it seems logical to me that the labor unions, in their resurgence, need to be multinational, too. It may be the last, best hope that any of us, anywhere, have to protect and increase our own bottom lines.

Diane
Hillsboro, OR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you kidding me???
Posted by: egreen711 on Sep 6, 2005 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The kinds of things people dream up. "Rebirth of the labor movement in L.A." That may sound great and exciting. But the reality is that the workers in LA are being forced to accept worsening pay and benefits, like everywhere else.
There will be a rebirth of the labor movement. But it won't come about in the way that is described in this article: by union bureaucrats and fat cat politicians passing some law with a thousand loopholes, or by passing some ballot proposition. That is pure PR.
Instead, workers will have to build and organize big social movements that take on the rich corporations, as well as the politicians and the labor bureaucrats that parade around as their "friends."
Only then will we see "the rebirth of the labor movement."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Are you kidding me??? Posted by: maxpayne
"...the good of the whole..."
Posted by: Sojourner on Sep 6, 2005 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's much harder to demonstrate than "injustice to some," but it is what is lacking. Yes, the concentrations of power in corporations allow them to organize for their self-interest much more easily than the general citizenry or, in this case, the wage earner.

But the continuing issues of the shrinking middle class, of corruption, and of the deterioration of urban environments, etc. point to the need for a change.

What unions do best is educate their members. Since the mass media are owned and operated for the benefit of corporations, education is a tough job.

It's no surprise the public schools are under attack. That will continue so long as voters hear propaganda about privatization and can't see through it. The failures of privatization begin with deregulation of airlines, savings and loans, and government support for evangelical religion.

But Americans love gamblers, so it will be a hard struggle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lilly
Posted by: Calamitysams@yahoo.com on Sep 6, 2005 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me that labor unions are in the right place at the right time. Now that millions have seen just how miserable it is to be poor, thanks to Katrina, we may well see some real social activism get a groundswell of support. This miserable administration may have done the poorest among us a big favor by completely dropping the ball when it came giving aid to the poor. I know many feel it's a race thing, but really, I think it's a socio-economic thing. Poor people don't vote-or they didn't, we might yet swell the voting rolls in a few months.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A voice of hope?
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 6, 2005 6:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have family in Inglewood, spent some time down there. I am glad they fought off Wal-Mart.

Well this article sounds a more hopeful note then some other ones. And I am happy it talked about clergy and religious leaders.

There are some hateful people here in the Alternet community. I hope they read those words:

clergy

religious leaders

Who are you to think that all Christians are bible thumping American Protestant Fundamentalist right wing televangelists?

That is so ignorant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progress at the local level
Posted by: lsapozhn on Sep 7, 2005 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Overall I appreciated this article. While things are not well on the international and national level (think Robertson, CAFTA, Bolton, transportation bill) there is more room for progress at the local level. Here in DC, we are currently waging a living wage campaign, which is looking auspicious. We certainly look to LA for inspiration (think Villaragosa) as we build the progressive base from the bottom up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]