Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why the Levee Broke

By Will Bunch, Attytood. Posted September 1, 2005.


Washington knew exactly what needed to be done to protect the citizens of New Orleans from disasters like Katrina. Yet federal funding for Louisiana flood control projects was diverted to pay for the war in Iraq.
Why the Levee Broke
Advertisement

Even though Hurricane Katrina has moved well north of the city, the waters continued to rise in New Orleans on Wednesday. That's because Lake Pontchartrain continues to pour through a two-block-long break in the main levee, near the city's 17th Street Canal. With much of the Crescent City some 10 feet below sea level, the rising tide may not stop until until it's level with the massive lake.

There have been numerous reports of bodies floating in the poorest neighborhoods of this poverty-plagued city, but the truth is that the death toll may not be known for days, because the conditions continue to frustrate rescue efforts.

New Orleans had long known it was highly vulnerable to flooding and a direct hit from a hurricane. In fact, the federal government has been working with state and local officials in the region since the late 1960s on major hurricane and flood relief efforts. When flooding from a massive rainstorm in May 1995 killed six people, Congress authorized the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, or SELA.

Over the next 10 years, the Army Corps of Engineers, tasked with carrying out SELA, spent $430 million on shoring up levees and building pumping stations, with $50 million in local aid. But at least $250 million in crucial projects remained, even as hurricane activity in the Atlantic Basin increased dramatically and the levees surrounding New Orleans continued to subside.

Yet after 2003, the flow of federal dollars toward SELA dropped to a trickle. The Corps never tried to hide the fact that the spending pressures of the war in Iraq, as well as homeland security -- coming at the same time as federal tax cuts -- was the reason for the strain. At least nine articles in the Times-Picayune from 2004 and 2005 specifically cite the cost of Iraq as a reason for the lack of hurricane- and flood-control dollars.

Newhouse News Service, in an article posted late Tuesday night at The Times-Picayune Web site, reported: "No one can say they didn't see it coming. ... Now in the wake of one of the worst storms ever, serious questions are being asked about the lack of preparation."

In early 2004, as the cost of the conflict in Iraq soared, President Bush proposed spending less than 20 percent of what the Corps said was needed for Lake Pontchartrain, according to this Feb. 16, 2004, article, in New Orleans CityBusiness:

The $750 million Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection project is another major Corps project, which remains about 20% incomplete due to lack of funds, said Al Naomi, project manager. That project consists of building up levees and protection for pumping stations on the east bank of the Mississippi River in Orleans, St. Bernard, St. Charles and Jefferson parishes.

The Lake Pontchartrain project is slated to receive $3.9 million in the president's 2005 budget. Naomi said about $20 million is needed.

"The longer we wait without funding, the more we sink," he said. "I've got at least six levee construction contracts that need to be done to raise the levee protection back to where it should be (because of settling). Right now I owe my contractors about $5 million. And we're going to have to pay them interest."

On June 8, 2004, Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, told the Times-Picayune: "It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay. Nobody locally is happy that the levees can't be finished, and we are doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue for us."

That June, with the 2004 hurricane seasion starting, the Corps' Naomi went before a local agency, the East Jefferson Levee Authority, and essentially begged for $2 million for urgent work that Washington was now unable to pay for. From the June 18, 2004 Times-Picayune:

"The system is in great shape, but the levees are sinking. Everything is sinking, and if we don't get the money fast enough to raise them, then we can't stay ahead of the settlement," he said. "The problem that we have isn't that the levee is low, but that the federal funds have dried up so that we can't raise them."

Digg!

Will Bunch is a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News and author of the blog Attytood.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
American taxpayers can't fix everything
Posted by: Frumkinlovesmoney on Sep 1, 2005 3:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Maestri's comment about the divergence of funds is his personal opinion. Pork is everywhere and just because someone got less than they asked for, does not mean the money was diverted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: American taxpayers can't fix everything Posted by: Frumkinlovesmoney
» This Time I Did -- research that is Posted by: aswgt@ix.netcom.com
» RE: in Holland they live below sea level Posted by: Frumkinlovesmoney
» Maestri's comment Posted by: Olympiada
» OMB? Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: OMB? Posted by: greenthinginwater
» Political Science Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: American taxpayers can't fix everything Posted by: greenthinginwater
Priorities...
Posted by: dj0114 on Sep 1, 2005 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, well… once again Georgie and Company's priorities have us in a bind. If he had not cut taxes so severely so that he and his rich friends could wallow in their money and tried to fight two major wars there may have been no need to cut funding for the levee projects in LA.

I wonder if those tax cuts are worth it now to the many who sided with Georgie. I daresay it will cost more than the tax cuts to put New Orleans back together.

Not only that, the hit our economy is taking now due to rising gas prices, lack of consumer's confidence and lack of confidence in Georgie's leadership will haunt us for a long time.

This disaster will also add to joblessness and the already ugly federal deficit.

So Georgie- do you think those tax cuts was money well spent now?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Priorities... Posted by: susan9390
» RE: Priorities... Posted by: xenacat
» What She Said Posted by: rotorooter
» RE: Priorities... Posted by: Frumkinlovesmoney
» RE: Priorities... Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Priorities... Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: Priorities... Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Priorities... Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Priorities... Posted by: nonaste
Priorities indeed!!
Posted by: Quendi on Sep 1, 2005 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The criminal gang running the country these daze has a well-defined set of priorities: 1) help the rich get richer, via massive tax cuts, lack of tax-evasion enforcement, changes to the rules such as getting rid of inheritance and capital gains taxes......., 2) diminish the size and scope of government in general - via changing laws (the gutting of envirnomental laws and regulations, which has only just begun, for instance!), regulations and policies, installing conservative ideologues in the nation's courts and anywhere else possible, and by the method Regan called "starving the beast": create massive, unsustainable deficits via huge tax cuts for the wealthy combined with unprecidented levels of military spending, thereby requiring drastic cuts in government services in the long run, and 3) attain and maintain power and control as long as possible and by any and all means necessary.

The loss of the funding required to protect New Orleans from natural dissasters such as Katrina, is a direct result of the warped priorities of the federal government. Look for more of the same in the years to come!!

-Quantum.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Priorities indeed!! Posted by: &one
» RE: Priorities indeed!! Posted by: rinthy
» RE: Priorities indeed!! Posted by: piasano
» Who else you going to cut taxes for? Posted by: greenthinginwater
Dubya's Gamble
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 1, 2005 4:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is another among, literally, hundreds of arguments that make the case for impeaching Bush. Much as he did with September 11th, he'll try to make poitical capital out of this. And as I said on another posing this morning, as he did with 9/11, count on him using this catastrophe as an excuse for doing something really dumb.

When the people of the United States finally understand the basic facts that are presented in this article (I loved the riverboat gambler analogy), that the presedent of the United States, the man who solemnly swore to "faithfully execute" his office (He loves to execute, what was the problem??), that he diverted desperately needed funds for hurrican protection on a tax cut for the richest one percent and an illegal, immoral invasion of a country that was a threat to no one but itself - when the people - WEEDA PEEPOLE, FOLKS - finally come to terms with what this hideous piece of shit did to their country, your country - MY COUNTRY, DAG NAP IT! - They'll run him out of town on a rail.

George W. Bush has done more damage to the United States of America than any of her enemies,past or present, real or imagined could ever have dreamed of doing.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I Agree Posted by: michele0726
» RE: Dubya's Gamble Posted by: beffie
» RE: Dubya's Gamble Posted by: RonaldBosch
» RE: Dubya's Gamble Posted by: hopewell88
» I agree with you, Tom Posted by: Bluecat
RFK, Jr.
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 1, 2005 5:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh and by the way, Go to today's Yahoo News and read Bobby Kennedy's article - It's great. And while you're at it, go to Amazon.com and order his recent book that exposes, chapter and verse, Bush's war on the environment.
Happy reading, kids!
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FK, Jr. Posted by: xenacat
» RE: FK, Jr. what's the link Posted by: billyboy43
Rebuild New Orleans above sea level
Posted by: ggmurray on Sep 1, 2005 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It strikes me that once the rescue missions have done all they can, we should give OLD New Orleans back to nature. Build NEW New Orleans somewhere above sea level, where life can reasonably expect to thrive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Will the MSM hold Bush and his Republican cohorts responsible?
Posted by: sausage on Sep 1, 2005 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't even know why I ask such a question. In this case it is merely rhetorical. On last night's Newhour with Jim Lehrer, the only mention of the administration and Congress cutting the Corps of Engineers' budget was a passing reference by Scientific American's editor, John Rennie.

It was known by the Corps, hydrologists and environmental scientists that New Orleans' levee system was a disaster waiting to happen.

Unfortunately in our current religion-happy environment, what has transpired in New Orleans and along the northern Gulf Coast will be chalked up merely as an "act of God." And we will go marrily on our national way holding no one accoutable for what, had it been attended to earlier, should have been preventable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corp of Engineers budget for New Orleans.
Posted by: james on Sep 1, 2005 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The president wanted to cut 51 million from the army Corp. of Engineers budget for the New Orleans district. Congress, which sets the Corps budget, voted to cut it a further 20 million, for a total cut of 71.2 million. Cut anything but the big tax cut for the rich. Isn't it curious how this is not reported in the corporate media?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why The Levee Broke
Posted by: Dadster3 on Sep 1, 2005 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this article is true, then we can argue--persuasively I think--that in the span of 6 short years we have witnessed the destruction of two of the worlds great cities, and that we can lay the blame for both at the feet of this President and his associates.

A recent guest author on PBS' "The News Hour", who has written extensively on southern Louisiana, said that the cost of bringing the levees up to what would have been required to protect it from Hurricane Katrena was equal to the cost of the war in Iraq for two days. Two Days. Think about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why The Levee Broke Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Why The Levee Broke Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Why The Levee Broke Posted by: pmgreer1
» RE: Why The Levee Broke Posted by: Dadster3
» RE: Why The Levee Broke Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Why The Levee Broke Posted by: helenwheels
Barbara
Posted by: Barbara on Sep 1, 2005 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry for the people in this disaster area. But,...the thing that I'm most sorry about is the lack of sympathy and support that the USA will get from the rest of the world this time around.
There we were after 9/11 offering our resources, heart felt sympathy, etc, trusting that as the " world leader" that your country would deal with that disaster in an appropriate way. It didn't happen & you blew it. You voted, or chose not to vote , back into Government,...a Government which represents you guys globaly by the way,....you voted back an idiot.
So,...we're sorry for the people that died in this disaster. We're sorry for the people who lost their homes and everything that they had. But,...we're not going to help you out. We're not going to collect money to help your people as we did for Indonesia. We're not too crazy about your disregard for the rest of the world. It's time for you guys to do it yourself and look after each other. Are you up for it ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barbara Posted by: Jas1317
» RE: Barbara Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: Barbara Posted by: grizzlyuk
» RE: Barbara Posted by: danbroadway
» RE: Barbara Posted by: Jennelle
» RE: Barbara Posted by: demidesigrrl
» Thanks Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Barbara Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Barbara Posted by: Barbara
» RE: Not So Posted by: The Butcher
This story needs to be told A LOT!!!
Posted by: bookwoman on Sep 1, 2005 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard the story about the diversion of funding for the levee strenghthening mentioned once yesterday morning. I, personally, haven't heard it repeated until I read it here. Once again, I ask where the broadcast media in on this. This story needs to be talked about, on the airwaves, where most people get their news.

How about it guys?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Professor of Political Science
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Sep 1, 2005 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What else is new? Bush has diverted over $200 billion to Iraq in order to commit war crimes (as documented in my latest book "Lying for Empire: How to Commit War Crimes with a Straight Face") and billions to the space program and missile defense. It seems that Bush has a lot of priorites it's just that none of them include the American people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Professor of Political Science Posted by: McCain/Bush '08
» Funds have always been diverted Posted by: greenthinginwater
Well said!
Posted by: bambic on Sep 1, 2005 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You beat me to the punch, Tom...what can I say but well said. Let's hear more from you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT ABOUT PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY?
Posted by: Kneel on Sep 1, 2005 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frumkinlovesmoney (at the top) is right, you people. The American taxpayer can't be expected to do everything.

In a post under Katrina's Economic Impact, Frumkin tells us that New Orleans was (was?) a corrupt city with "one of the most corrupt police departments in the nation."

MY POINT EXACTLY! Why bother dispensing taxpayer dollars to shore up the levees when God, who hates a corrupt police department, is just going to flood the city anyway?

I say it's time for some PERSONAL RESPONSIBILTY here. Why didn't these people have their own equipment to deal with this? They knew they were living in a potential hurricane zone - why didn't individual households purchase their own medical supplies, heavy pumps, lifeboats, helicopters, levees, and so forth?

You want flood control, mister, go buy it yourself. Go down to Home Depot and say, Hello, I'd like to buy a flood control, and then get to work and earn the money to pay for it. You're worried about mosquito-borne disease? Don't expect a hand-out, get off your butt! Buy a can of Raid, rent a helicopter and spend your Saturday spraying the standing water.

You want to rebuild the wetlands that, until a few decades ago, shielded New Orleans from this sort of thing? Get some potting soil and get to work. You want a war in Iraq? Pay for it yourself! Don't expect the American taxpayer to do everything.

And why should it be the *National* guard that deals with this. They're, correctly, busy guarding the nation in Fallujah.

This is a municipal issue, and as such it should be dealt with by the Municipal Guard. Or maybe the Inter-Municipal Guard.

If people were dumb enough have a corrupt police department in a hurricane zone, well, I say that whatever happens is their own damn fault!

How do you tackle these problems? Let the locals choose pay for their OWN issues, or not. It's YOUR responsibility, YOUR choice, and if you screw up, don't ask the American taxpayer for a hand out - just like we did with Iraq. You think Don Rumsfield would come looking for a hand out from the American taxpayer? No way.

That man shows tremendous stoicism and courage in the face of other people's pain and danger. Take a cue from him and show a little backbone. You go into a hurricane with the levees you have, not the levees you need.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nice sarcasm...... Posted by: Diecash1
» RIGHT ON! Posted by: dkm
» RE: IGHT ON! Posted by: Kneel
» RE: IGHT ON! Posted by: helenwheels
» I got it! Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: WHAT ABOUT PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY? Posted by: speaktruthpower
» touche kneel Posted by: beetruetoyou
» Or you could simply leave town. Posted by: greenthinginwater
» Having people mature Posted by: Olympiada
» I agree with you too bluecat Posted by: Olympiada
» Those who fail to plan Posted by: greenthinginwater
» Those who fail to plan Posted by: greenthinginwater
» I agree - and this is scary Posted by: Olympiada
Misplaced priorities
Posted by: Pete29 on Sep 1, 2005 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Compassionate conservatism at its most ruthless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where to donate?
Posted by: pb120669 on Sep 1, 2005 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone have any opinions (laugh!) about where to donate money to help folks in the aftermath? I want my money to go to the infirm, aged, and poor folks who couldn't get out.

Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where to donate? Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: Where to donate? Posted by: knitter
» RE: Where to donate? Posted by: Yoman
» RE: Where to donate? Posted by: anewport
I'd like to think he'd say....
Posted by: Beth G. on Sep 1, 2005 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What does George W. Bush have to say for himself now?

I like to think he'd say, "you've been working with the federal Gov't on this since the 1960s. 40+ freakin' years. Over $500M dollars has been spent on this. And this is the best the crack engineers could come up with? How is this MY fault?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'd like to think he'd say.... Posted by: helenwheels
Amerika's Biggest (un)Natural Disaster
Posted by: rkewen on Sep 1, 2005 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder how happy all the bubba's in the red states of Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama are now with their chosen idiot. This greedy and arrogant administration is the biggest disaster that has ever occurred on American soil, and unfortunately they are a disaster for the whole planet, not just their own country.

I've heard that the southern mansion of racist/facist Trent Lott was completely destroyed by Katrina - there must have been a mix-up with communications to God on that one, isn't Trent on God's side? I will save my compassion for those more deserving than Mr. Lott and only regret that he wasn't home to greet Katrina personally and explain his connections to the big guy upstairs.

By the way that idiot "frumkinlovesmoney" should look into scoring a position in this current administrations of criminals, his username indicates that he worships the same god - money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some much for Homeland preparedness...
Posted by: dpcosteajr on Sep 1, 2005 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is going to best an EXCELLENT test and a shocking wake-up call for the governments of Louisanna and the United States. It is as if New Orleans had been hit by the largest of terrorist bombs (attacks, whatever...) and we see first hand how ill prepared they are to deal with the situation!

In my opinion Federal troops, helicopters, and APCs should have been rolling into the area as soon as the weather broke! And what did we see? Days of suffering, unrescued people, no communications (if you believe the mass media) and general chaos. I can't believe they allow ed ANY people to remain on the streets, exit the Superdome, or "loot" any of the undamaged stores!

The NAVY has the air cushioned (LCAC) vehicles, I know because I worked on them! The secretary of the NAVY should have been deploying them towards the Gulf of Mexico before Katrina even left Florida!

I suspect there will be calls for hearings and investigations over the poor response after all this is over. And don't even get me started about the American Red Cross... With all their 'we need you donations now' crap! Sorry! Where have they been over the past year? Sitting on their collective butts and praying a major hurricane didn't hit the U.S.? Duh!? I guess they were "well prepared" too!

Did anyone in any agency imagine only 1,000, 2,000 or 3,000 people would be displaced when the next major storm hit the U.S.?

I know these people are having a tough time right now, but some of them should be ashamed of themselves for stooping to the levels of "looting" and petty theft we have seen. Where does Mr. Looter think he is going to hide that bag of Nike sneakers until he can unload them? Or are they going to hand them out at the Astrodome to the needy families? "Het buddy, where'd you get all them shoes?" Unbelieveable.

Homes, garages, and self storage facilities are going to have to be emptied of their contaminated contents. So no storing anything of value anywhere in the area, that's for sure!

Americans, especially those in crisis, should be able to set a better example.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Matt Singer of Montana nails the cons on responsibility
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 1, 2005 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Assessing Responsibility

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The irony makes my head explode
Posted by: helenwheels on Sep 1, 2005 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I simply won't be able to believe it if people don't wake up after this.

The Coward of Crawford struts about saying how "safe" he's keeping Amurka, but how many have died now UNDER HIS WATCH?

And, how many could have been avoided? He was warned about Al Quaeda and 9/11. He was warned about the weak levees.

He did nothing, and now thousands are dead.

He invaded a country that had no ties to 9/11, and killed thousands of them. Nearly 2000 of our own have died for his meaningless war.

He is ruining our country, and hurting not only the U.S. but the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What are you talking about? Posted by: Olympiada
"Scorched or Flooded, the Situation's the Same"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Sep 1, 2005 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So BushCo takes money away from New Orleans' flood control projects for "homeland security." Well, I guess now we'll get to see how secure the nation feels with its largest port, the fifth largest in the world, as well as much of its oil refining, shut down. I doubt that any terrorist attack could have done the damage that has occurred from Katrina, at least in part because of BushCo's stupid funding decisions.

What is it going to take to get President Duh! and his merry band of neoCON thugs out of the White House?!

(By the way, Americans, especially those in the South, should be familiar with the spirit of the Bush agenda – that is, if they remember General Sherman's "scorched earth" march to the sea in the Civil War. . .)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Security Posted by: Olympiada
Public Safety is not "pork"!
Posted by: cici on Sep 1, 2005 9:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Pork is everywhere and just because someone got less than they asked for...."

We're not talking about "pork" in the form of federally-funding the promotion of golf. Shoring up levees is not "pork." Preventing this kind of tragedy is not "pork." What is the government for anyway? What are my taxes for anyway? I am proud to pay taxes when they are used wisely for public projects.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Public Safety is not "pork"! Posted by: Johnny-Boy
» Frumkin = Johnny-boy Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Frumkin = Johnny-boy Posted by: Johnny-Boy
» RE: Frumkin = Johnny-boy Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Public Safety is not "pork"! Posted by: Johnny-Boy
Government Responsibility
Posted by: dkm on Sep 1, 2005 9:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The last I read, one of the major documents of our country (The Constitution) stated flat out that the function of government is "to promote the general welfare." That includes taking reasonable procedures to prevent foreseeable disasters such as just occurred in Louisiana. Our present administration completely and deliberately failed to comply with its legal obligations, a case of "high crimes and misdemeanors" if there ever was one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Government Responsibility Posted by: Johnny-Boy
» RE: Government Responsibility Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Government Responsibility Posted by: Johnny-Boy
» RE: Government Responsibility Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Government Responsibility Posted by: Johnny-Boy
» RE: Government Responsibility Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Government Responsibility Posted by: Johnny-Boy
You Guys Are Out there!
Posted by: Johnny-Boy on Sep 1, 2005 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yikes, I think I've found probably the biggest collection of boneheads since Daily Kos.

What burden of proof do you guys have for the accusations you all toss around? If you heard it on Air America it must be true.

From 5 minutes of reading I've gathered that 1) President Bush stole the election 2) President Bush cut taxes to he and his rich buddies could sit around and smoke cigars lit by $1000 dollar bills and shoot puppies. 3) The hurricane would have never happened had we signed Kyoto, instead New Orleans would be harvesting crops of lollipop fields and chocolate meadows 4) President Bush's plans to invade the moon are taking money away from disaster relief.

My goodness! Reading ya'lls comments is like watching a bunch of children complain about not being able to eat coco-puffs three meals a day.

I'd like to address everything in here, but I think you knuckleheads are too far out to hear the reality shouted at ya'll.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]