Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Don't Steal This Television

By Kelly Hearn, AlterNet. Posted August 26, 2005.


In 1970, Junior Allen received a life-sentence for stealing a television. He spent the next thirty-five years in prison.
Junior Allen

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Kelly Hearn

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

A man does thirty-five years in prison for stealing a $149 television. Case files from the gulag? Try North Carolina.

In 1970, Junior Allen, a black sharecropper, walked into an unoccupied house in Johnson County, North Carolina and stole a white woman's television. He hid the set in a nearby wooded area and returned to his work camp. Later confronted by police, he confessed. With prior arrests for burglaries and an assault, a jury found Allen guilty of second-degree burglary and, under the law of the day, sentenced him to life in prison.

The North Carolina legislature has since changed the law (second degree burglary now carries three years) and legal experts say the now-deceased judge probably expected Allen would be paroled. Allen was denied parole 25 times.

In May 2005, after a law professor bird-dogged the case for three years, the 60-year-old Allen walked out of the Orange Correctional Center, a stooped and bitter symbol of a miscarriage of justice.

"I think about it every morning and every night," Allen, who now lives with his sister in rural Georgia, told AlterNet. "That was my life."

How can a man do three decades for stealing a television? The white woman's family has long claimed that Allen beat her. But he was only charged with burglary, and Richard Rosen, the University of North Carolina law professor who took on the case, told AlterNet that court records and transcripts are clear.

"There is no question that that allegation has become somewhat of a myth in the family now," he said. There is absolutely nothing in the record that supports it. We're talking rural North Carolina in 1970," Rosen continued. "There is no way a large African American man roughs up an 87-year-old white woman and doesn't get charged with it.

The parole board maintains that it was Allen's behavior in prison that kept him locked up. He was far from a model prisoner. Over the course of his 35 years in prison, he racked up some 60 infractions ranging from gambling to the use of foul language to a weapons possession charge. Allen says the infractions were fabricated. What's more, he watched violent inmates with the same kinds of citations come and go. Rosen said all but eight of the charges were minor, like having unauthorized money, the kinds of things it's impossible to live without in prison, Rosen said. He never attacked a guard or another inmate.

While race played a role in Allen's sentence and continued time in prison, it wasn't the only factor. African Americans serve on North Carolina's parole commission, and the director of the board is black.

"I think in the end it was a case of embarrassment for the state of North Carolina when this finally got publicized," said Rosen. "Allen just fell through the cracks. He just got lost and nobody paid attention. When Allen's case started to get media attention, the people involved began covering their tracks. The state realized that for 25 to 30 years they were paying between $25,000 and $30,000 a year to keep a 65-year-old man in prison for stealing a TV."

Neither North Carolina's parole board nor the office of Democratic Governor Michael F. Easley responded to interview requests.

"When I speak or write about this case, people cant believe it," said Reverend Bernice Powell Jackson, executive director of the United Church of Christ's Justice and Witness Ministries. "People assume it was a case of three strikes, that it was some kind of automatic punishment. It wasn't. It's really hard for people to believe that the criminal justice system could go this much awry."

Because Allen's sentence was legal in North Carolina at the time, he has no legal recourse. Instead, just five months free, Allen is slowly trying to get his life back. Jobs are scare and even looking for work means getting a photo I.D., which means getting a birth certificate, which meant spending a month shuttling between Georgia and Alabama, where he was born. Nowadays, he spends his time looking and hoping for work, watching television, doing grocery shopping and running errands. He wants to start fishing. He's not interested in talking to reporters. As for work, he's hoping to use the forklift-driving skills he acquired in prison.

Officials in North Carolina have stated to the media that they are reviewing other cases of people convicted under overreaching laws. But it's too late for Allen, former inmate number 0004604.

"I feel like I been cheated," he said at the end of our phone conversation. "I lost time that I won't never make up no more."

Digg!

Kelly Hearn is a former UPI staff writer who lives in Washington DC and Latin America. His work has appeared in the Christian Science Monitor, American Prospect, and other publications.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"When In Doubt, Lock 'Em Up and Leave 'Em There"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Aug 27, 2005 10:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe cases like his are some of the reason that we have a higher percentage of our population behind bars than any other industrialized nation on Earth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same old. As in California with 3-strikes law,
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 29, 2005 12:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The man was denied parole 25 times. So he did not 'fall between the cracks.' I can only assume that the whole system of justice in the US is so corrupt, so disfunctional, so blind, so insane that the hundreds of bureaucrats who saw the paper trail believed it was 'right and just' to punish in this way.

That we all were punished ($25-30,000 a year is about the average tax payer cost per inmate and equivalent cost for a year at Harvard) does not relieve the crime done to this man. It is duplicated in most US prisons, where a small drug possession offense requires mandated prison sentences just as long.

We are a punitive society. We believe punishment is good! Some of us are so pathetic our only claim to righteousness is we have never been convicted of a crime. I suspect in such cases it's only because they've not yet caught us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not just in Carolina!
Posted by: kgs1947 on Aug 30, 2005 3:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can stay within the borders of North Carolina or else go across them to every nation in this country. Punishment is the way of our justice system, not rehab. Every criminal lawyer and judge needs to spend time in our jail systems and see what kind of justice they met out afterward! It's like Bush! Send him and Cheney and Rumsdumb to Iraq and Afganistan to "fight", and see what happens to their little world of illusions. Sad, but I bet you every person who upholds the injustice of this country's justice sysem is a born-again Christian or whatever...like Pat Robertson et al.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not just in Carolina! Posted by: stoney13
» RE: Not just in Carolina! Posted by: Basenjis
"Justice" System a Veritable Cesspool
Posted by: rangerjim on Aug 30, 2005 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The so called justice system is really a cesspool of graft, corruption, and the auctioning of "justice" to the highest bidder. Not only that there are two "justice" systems, one for the fat cats and one for everyone else. It is high time that this system was overthrown, and the Bushes and Cheneys along with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

...And Justice For All...
Posted by: BuckFush on Aug 30, 2005 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They say Justice is blind....in North Carolina's case, Justice is also deaf and dumb [much like the rest of southern politics and law]. Fortunately, the paper trail left by this crime [unjustly taking 35 years of a man's life] didn't need to be written in brail, although the invisible ink didn't seem to help. I'm sure the bible-thumping, self-righteous, "moral-majority" will look at this with the same sort of brand of compasionate conservatism that brought us such great pieces of legislation like The Patriot Act, No Child Left Behind, The Clear Skies Act....the list goes on and on and on and on....

The saddest part of this is that NC feels the value of a black man's life is less than the value of a television.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ...And Justice For All... Posted by: stoney13
» RE: ...And Justice For All... Posted by: ALANHESTER
I guess I'm not getting it...
Posted by: melissa999 on Aug 30, 2005 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems like this guy had a raw deal from the beginning, being a black sharecropper in North Carolina.

With prior arrests for theft and assault, coupled with accusations from the white woman's family about a beating, his jail sentence was extreme, but not completely out of the question for the time.

However, he did steal the television, no? Are we to say that if he had been not caught for this particular tv and not placed in jail, that he would have spent the next 30 years contributing $25,000-$30,000 a year to society?

Maybe...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» say what? Posted by: decembrist
Thank you
Posted by: Barbara Susan on Aug 30, 2005 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for writing and printing this important story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing could be finah than to be in Carolinah
Posted by: LMNOP on Aug 30, 2005 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
F**k the South! There aren't enough hurricanes to satisfy me. Who's idea was it to fight to keep those retards in the Union? Hell, Bush could be their president and maybe the rest of us could have a taste of civilization.

I know, not all southerners are bad people. A few aren't racists and don't advocate lynchings. Well then, what are you still doing down there associating with the overwhelming majority that does?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Someone elses's fault
Posted by: InvisiblePimpernil on Aug 30, 2005 1:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He seems to feel that his behavior is always someone else's fault. If he was on a work gang what did he need with that TV anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Someone elses's fault Posted by: bluegull
» RE: Someone elses's fault Posted by: ALANHESTER
And it took so long to prosecute Eric Rudolph
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 30, 2005 2:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wouldn't be surprised if Rudolph were let go quicker than the inmate described in the article. After all, the religious rightists would use him as a role model for abortion scare. I'm glad that this article does point out that it's more than race. If you really want to know why cons prefer 3 strikes law rather than genuine crime reform, I strongly suggest George Lakoff's "Moral Politics" and David Callahan's "The Cheating Culture" .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Race Is Still an Important Facet
Posted by: seriousinquiryonly on Aug 31, 2005 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A television is a commodity that can be sold. Even a person in a work camp, ie. a slave laborer, knows that like himself that innate commodity can be turned into cash.
Also, I take issue with the claim that Hearns makes that race is insignificant in this report. Sometimes even black people exact very high tolls that are indeed racially motivated. In the racial capitalism that forms the context for our existence in the Americas, race is always a factor, particularly when it means you get to keep the good job of having the privilege to protect the criminal justice system's slave labor economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

not quite...
Posted by: melissa999 on Sep 7, 2005 8:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My point is that yes, this guy got a raw deal and the punishment was overly harsh for his crime. But does that make him a saint?

My point was that society tends to reward and punish people indiscriminately and this story seems to be about how it just isn't fair.

The world is unjust, last time I checked. I also like to play devil's advocate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]