Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

In Kids We Trust

By Kim Ridley, Ode. Posted August 25, 2005.


A new movement is increasingly grabbing attention: democratic schools. What happens when children get a say in their own education?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Kim Ridley


Related Stories

America's Top 10 Green Schools

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

While his peers at other schools were memorizing their multiplication tables, Ken Pruitt was lying on his back watching clouds, building tree forts with friends, or poking around in the woods. Pruitt was no juvenile delinquent. He was a student at the Sudbury Valley School near Boston, where children get to decide for themselves how they want to spend each day.

Come again? What does cloud watching or fort building have to do with learning? Everything, according to Sudbury Valley's founders. "Children don't know what they want to learn, they know what they want to do," says Mimsy Sadofsky, one of several original founders who still work at the school. What children typically want to do is play -- which cognitive scientists say is one of the main ways human beings learn.

 "Learning teaches us what is known, play makes it possible for new things to be learned," says David Elkind, Professor of Child Development at Tufts University, and most recently author of The Hurried Child, All Grown Up and No Place to Go, and Miseducation. "There are many concepts and skills that can only be learned through play."

Pruitt, who attended Sudbury Valley from ages six to seventeen, enjoyed a "Huck Finn childhood". "I spent hours by myself climbing trees, walking on the trails, sitting and observing," he says. He especially liked to perch on a tree leaning low over a swamp and peer into the tea-colored water, watching fish and insects, frogs and turtles go about their daily lives.

He recalls sitting perfectly still on a stone wall in the woods to watch for wildlife. A deer came so close he could almost touch it, and then a raccoon. Something stirred in him that never would have happened had he been sitting behind a desk. "Human beings, especially children before they're programmed by society, are open to seeing other living things in the world as equals instead of having the sense that we're their masters. That's what set me on the course to want to preserve wild nature. By the time I was fifteen, it was clear to me that I'd follow a career in wilderness protection." Today, at age thirty-five, Pruitt is Executive Director of the Massachusetts Association of Conservation Commissions. In a state that loses forty acres a day to sprawl, his organization helps people in more than three hundred communities protect the kinds of wetlands he loved as a child.

A new survey of alumni from the Sudbury Valley School shows that such idyllic school experiences has not harmed or hampered them as adults. Eighty-two percent of graduates interviewed pursued further study such as college or trade school after Sudbury Valley. The others said they were ready to enter the fields they planned to pursue as adults. Alumni have become ballet dancers and farmers, physicians and circus performers, carpenters, teachers, lawyers, farmers, entrepreneurs, musicians, clerks, you name it.

But the most important measures of success seldom have much to do with college admissions or job titles. And that's where Sudbury Valley graduates like Pruitt tend to excel. Eighty-six percent of those surveyed said their lives reflect their values. That's what the founders had in mind when they started the school in 1968. Sadofsky and another founder, Daniel Greenberg, along with Jason Lempka, have just published a new book, The Pursuit of Happiness: The Lives of Sudbury Valley Alumni. Of the past thirty-seven years they write, "We believe that the school provides an environment that trains each individual to think for themself, and to lead an examined life that is fulfilling, meaningful, and fun."

Sudbury Valley is the oldest existing democratic school in the U.S. and the most widely imitated. It has no tests or grades and is run by a "school meeting" patterned after New England town meetings in which all participants have an equal vote on important matters. At a time when debates rage about education standards and testing, these schools offer an intriguing and controversial alternative: putting children in charge of their own education.

Although each of the more than 160 democratic schools around the world evolved independently, they generally share the practices of allowing students to choose how to spend their days, vote on important school matters, and participate in a community of equals, regardless of age. These practices raise many eyebrows in education circles, but advocates say democratic schools can teach more traditional schools a thing or two about helping children grow into happy adults, learn to navigate a complex world -- and participate in a free society.

In mid-December, the Victorian mansion that houses the Sudbury Valley School in Framingham, Massachusetts, bustles with activity. Some students rehearse music and dance performances for an upcoming show at the school. Others make gingerbread houses, play video games, read, argue, sew, study, or just hang out. There's nothing here that even remotely resembles a classroom. Just lots of rooms filled with comfy chairs and books, plus music studios, an art room, a woodshop, performance space, a darkroom, and kitchen.

Learning flows from the daily life of the school, which includes 160 or so students and 10 staff members. Students know each staff person's areas of expertise, and ask for help when they need it. "Although kids may never be in a formal class," says Sadofsky, "the adults here are models for them."         


Digg!

Kim Ridley is co-editor of "Signs of Hope: In Praise of Ordinary Heroes." She writes about people creating positive social change for Ode Magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
bigscott
Posted by: Scott Griffith on Aug 25, 2005 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry to puncture any well-meaning balloons but it has to be said: this article, with all its journalistic stereotypes flying, (one-room schoolhouses - why 'toxic'? - and so on) represents a most pernicious thread in published 'educational' thinking, the thread which says that parents and children and journalists know better than teachers; let's have another innovation.

The obvious if inconvenient fact is that children are in no position to know what they should be taught. They don't even know what they want, although they may protest loudly and childishly to the contrary. Sensible parents know this and consult trusted teachers when making decisions about their children's schooling. Journalists, well, they're just doing their job these days, making money for their bosses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bigscott Posted by: hhaber
» Bigscott is fool enough - no Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: bigscott Posted by: negrita7
» RE: bigscott Posted by: Michaelmammal
» RE: bigscott Posted by: jbachman
Fun is important too!
Posted by: yasmin on Aug 25, 2005 7:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although children most of the time don't know what is best for them, especially when it comes to what they should be taught, i think this article makes a very imporatant point: that children's lives are super-hectic and stressful with standardized tests and all the standards put on them. Maybe there is something in the middle between these democratic, free spirited schools and regular public schools. I think the point is well taken- children need to have freedom to grow and they need to have childhoods. Fun is just as important as learning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fun is important too! Posted by: Rebcamuse
» RE: Fun is important too! Posted by: negrita7
» RE: Fun is important too! Posted by: Michaelmammal
» kids don't know what they need Posted by: Olympiada
All Grown Up and No Place to Go
Posted by: Olympiada on Aug 25, 2005 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kim,
Thank you for this deep, rich and timely article. Public education is very much on my mind today. It is my daughter's first day of kindergarten, and I am reminded of the hell I went through.

You raise so many good points in this article, it is hard to comment on them all. One thing I wanted to comment on was the issue of structure. I for my part was identified as a mentally gifted minor at the end of kindergarten and subsequently accelerated. I think this wreaked havoc on not only my mind but my education. It wasn't until I got to junior college that I learned from a scholarship counselor that people on both ends of the learning spectrum, both learning disabled and highly gifted, need structure! I find this is true in my life. I get upset if people act in unpredictable ways. Schedules are very important. So in this aspect I am not sure if the Sudbury Valley school would be such a thing.

The next thing I wanted to comment on was about the mother paying for her child's education. That is very important. Children need to have their emotional needs supported. If they are not, there is no way they are going to succeed in school.

I see that you said that many if not most of these students went on to have successful careers. I wonder about that in the areas of atheletics, or art, or music. These disciplines require hours of monotous practice to achieve excellency. I my self dropped out of all the above because of a lack of not only patience, but emotional support.

I think the Sudbury Schools offer an interesting alternative, but I also think my points need to be addressed as well.

Olympiada

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EDUCATORS
Posted by: froggeymonkey on Aug 25, 2005 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I hear one more time that just because one is a "professional educator" that they know better that I what is "right" for my child, I am going to scream! I have cared for this child 24/7/365, I know his needs, his learning style, and his personality. But some educator thinks he knows better, having been around my child maybe 10 minutes!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» PARENTS Posted by: gaspass
what kids need
Posted by: flatulence10 on Aug 27, 2005 4:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Children have been dumbes down enough in public schools. they need a steady curriculum to help them learn. They also need corporal punishment from time to time. They need discipline, and they need love, and quality teachers to teach them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

girlygirl
Posted by: girlygirl on Aug 27, 2005 12:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The word "education" comes from the latin "educare" which means "to draw out". Might it not be a novel idea to draw out the desire for learning that is within us rather than shove in what is precribed as supposedly necessary? The stress that we are inflicting upon the education system (parents, children and teachers) is enormous. Brain development does not support our current theory that teaching academics younger and younger is better. The very things that help develop new connections in the brain (music, movement, art) are being taken away in favor of more time to teach to the test. Sudbury has obviously been successful having been in operation for 35 years. Why not be open to another way that children might learn? As to corporal punishment, the belief is that power and fear are good motivaters and sends the message that fear is more powerful than love - something we all know is ultimately false.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is the way it's supposed to be...
Posted by: StreetPhotog on Aug 27, 2005 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Studying photography at an art school, I know how big of a joke the education system is in this country is. You don't need a degree or a diploma to prove you can do anything... but the traditionalist American won't accept change and it will stay that way until we wake up.

It's just like the question your high school guidance councilor asked you. "If money wasn't an issue, and you can do whatever you want for the rest of your life, what would you do?" This is supposed to be what you should do for a living, because you're naturally interested in it. I just want to play my bagpipes and take photos, and I didn't need the first 12 years of my education to figure this out!

Standards are the best way to bring everyone up to standard. Whether that standard makes everyone equally intelligent or equally retarded is another question...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thoughts from a teacher
Posted by: bstich on Aug 27, 2005 7:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been an elementary school teacher for the past 14 years. Since the No Child Left Behind law went into effect, schools are becoming more and more like factories, in the name of standardization. Kids are expected to learn rote material and test taking strategies in the name of learning. Play (which is a child's work) is all but absent from school. Kindergarteners are considered a failure if they do not learn to read.

I believe that we should be doing things with kids and not to them. If we want kids to be life-long learners they need to have a voice in their own education. And standardized tests are the WORST way to measure learning.

Alfie Kohn is one of my inspirations (his book Punished by Rewards is a life-changing read) and I appreciated his comments in this article. I thought this article raised interesting ideas on what education is, and what it could be. I would love to visit one of those schools.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about parents?
Posted by: 404080 on Aug 28, 2005 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would agree that kids need a lot of 'unstructure', like play time, contact with their natural environment, time to let their curiosity prosper. They also need socialization to learn how to interact and cooperate properly in society. They also need a community support base, the old 'it takes a village to raise a chid'.

So where are parents? Why should it be necessary to structure all of these things into some revolutionary new educational style when this community is ready-made at home. Just give kids some free time to go into the woods, back yard or whatever and catch bugs, build forts etc. Forcing kids into competitive sports like hockey and soccer which typically turn into power dramas between parents is not the answer.

Go for a walk in the woods with them and let them ask any question that comes to mind. Encourage them to read on their own. Let them be kids! When kids get the community support they need starting at home, then their sense of justice, values and critical thinking skills will bud and grow healthily and they will have a good base for learning . Then we can start talking about reforming public education, and kids will be better equipped to contribute too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What about parents? Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: What about parents? Posted by: girlygirl
Many missed the point of this article
Posted by: cmysticism on Aug 28, 2005 3:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article on Alternet may be the first, capsule step of mainstream liberals beginning to embrace the platform of youth liberation, just as they began to do in the '70's until the conservative takeover beginning with the Reagan years beat us back into the Stone Age of social enlightenment and waylaid the progressivism of the early to mid '70's. It's a profound shame that so many liberals spout the stereotypical "children don't know what's best for them" and numerous euphemisms to justify adult power and control over their kids' lives, treating them like property, and no matter how rude they are about it, they have numerous defenders.
This is a touchy subject, especially with parents, but it needed to be broached on Alternet, and the (re) thinking among liberals needed to start somewhere, and I'm glad it was here, as liberals grow increasingly braver and more resolute. I look forward to the day where liberals support ASFAR and NYRA with the same fervor they (rightfully) support the NAACP and gay rights organizations. Of course, there will be growing pains, and it takes time for people to change their thinking...and this great article may be a first step in reviving this civil question among liberals. Kudos.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another way for teachers to do less
Posted by: InvisiblePimpernil on Aug 28, 2005 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NEA owns the democratic party and this looks like another way for teachers to do even less. Mental excellence is worth fighting for, but that's one war the liberals won't address. How many people get killed in our society just by being ill trained or socially unskilled? Just keep giving the kids Ritalin and tell them they know best, when in fact, most know nothing at all. What a plan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

barrys new conversations
Posted by: barrys new conversations on Aug 28, 2005 5:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are known by our differences. Any school system or for that matter any government that does not model itself on that fact will fail to the degree that it doesn't. The low-cost and most effective school systems are local. The immediate family is the most local followed by the community. Federal shemes on education are based on the misconception that everyone is equal- a non-starter.
Sudbury School should be copied.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Just Don't Get It
Posted by: tds12 on Aug 28, 2005 6:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a professor of education I found the article fun but nothing new. However, the threads reveal why we need democratic schools. Most assumptions about structure and children typically are false. As stated in the article, the grads of these schools typically end up in "liberal" type occupations and are civically engaged. This is why NCLB and the standards movement threaten American society. Those who support these movements understand the power of democratic schools and will use any tactic to discredit them. Don't fall victim to their rhetoric. Kids will learn what they need to know when they need to know it. They will also seek out help and engage teachers if given the chance. When you make the comment that "kids need. . ." you're giving support to conservatives that would like nothing more than to control all schools and the curricula. As George S. Counts, dared us a long time ago, "Dare the schools build a new social order?" Wake up! It's happening now, however, the new social order that Counts and other progressives dreamed of is nowhere in sight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Archaic methods
Posted by: Chanutin on Aug 28, 2005 6:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the truth lies somewhere between jail-schools and democratic schools, but more towards democratic. A quote from a 4th grader in "How Children Fail": "Kids like to learn, we just don't like to be pushed around." Anybody who knows anything about education will tell you that, in the end, all learning is voluntary. Sure, you can enforce "bulemic" education - gorge and purge,cram and test, but it won't stick.
Children aren't fully competent to guide their own lives and education, but we need to allow them to do so to the level of their competence. They need teachers to expose them to what they don't know that they don't know, and provide both academic guidance and procedural boundaries. Most of all, they need to be inspired, to see people around them who love the exchange and exploration of knowledge.
Standardized tests will work when someone develops the standardized child.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As an educator and a liberal...
Posted by: Spot on Aug 28, 2005 9:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Olympiada said: "As an artist, I want to be trained in a medium before I go out there and do my own thing with it."

If you had read the article without presupposing a threat to the teaching profession, you would have seen that democratic schools are organized to give the children an opportunity to be educated in the things thay want to be trained in. If they wanted to be a painter, the resources would need to be made available to train them in that medium. While I have no personal experience in this type of school, I appreciate its place and can think of many students whom I believe would benefit from this environment more than from a traditional one.

The democratic principle does not give total freedom to the child, but rather gives them the freedom their parents allow. If the product of the school is not "education", the parents would have both an obligation and a $5000 incentive to return their child to public school. Neither the level of control a parent has over their child, nor the level of obligation they have for her welfare, is mitigated in the least by the type of education a child recieves. An alternative style of education should, in my opinion, only be used in circumstances where the child is:
a) unresponsive to traditional methods
b) unable to recieve the desired education in traditional schools
c) so obviously predisposed to the non-traditional method that it would seem abusive to deny it.

The relationship between teacher and student is not, nor should it ever be, one-way. As a teacher, can anyone deny that they have not also learned from people who play the role of student? Furthermore, as anyone who has spent time in education can attest to, the needs of the individual students will require different methods even within the traditional classroom. While the standardized test won't care whether your students learn best from lecture or by role-play, you must learn to reach all the children in your classroom, sometimes even stooping to (sic) letting students teach each other.

While your own experience may lead you to believe that children need an imposed structure, I invite you to take me at my word when I say that all children are not the same. They do not all require the same environment to excel, and they do not all have the same goals in life.

Sometimes one size fits only one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democratic Renewal
Posted by: Ashington on Aug 28, 2005 11:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its seems that Democracy has undergone a sudden spotlight once more. Not in the Propaganda that TBS and Fox shows to erase our wills and attention to the Government's fault. Anyone aware that the FBI and CIA and probably the NSA if such an agency exists, watched the Russian Programs, and when they saw an upsurge in Russian Nationalist, as far as an upsurge could be detected, they put themselves on high alert for Russian Activity? same deal here.
Two Specific examples. Democratic Schools and Collective, democratic Businesses. They are both induated in the ideals of democracy, and exhibit the basics of the functioning idealized system. Seems that while in our government, People are losing rights left and right, and up and down, and inside and out, There is still a candle burning for those promises written about in the Constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corrina McFarlane
Posted by: Corrina on Aug 29, 2005 1:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Kim for bringing this ever-important conversation. My current favorite quote is by parent educator extraordinaire, Pam Leo: "Let's raise children who won't have to recover from their childhood." www.connectionparenting.com - Sudbury school in the USA, like Summerhill in England continue to be catalysts for essential dialogue around childrearing and education two generations on. Let's keep talking... and note the new national 'WarmLine" Family Support Service to suppport and inspire conscious choices in this field of human endeavor: www.aTLCWarmLine.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]