Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Let's Talk About Texts

By ZP Heller, AlterNet. Posted August 25, 2005.


The cost of college textbooks has long been spiraling out of control. Now, student groups and legislators are working bring them back down to earth.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by ZP Heller


Related Stories

America's Top 10 Green Schools

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

It's no surprise to hear that the costs of a college education are always increasing. Given the misguided priorities in Washington and in state capitols, students, parents and even the government are having to shoulder ever more of the burden of higher education.

What is more surprising, and substantially less defensible, is the skyrocketing price of textbooks. A report published by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) in July concluded that in the academic year 2003-2004, "students and their families spent over $6 billion [PDF link] on new and used textbooks."

Textbook prices have risen at twice the rate of annual inflation during the last two decades, an average of 6 percent each year since the 1987-1988 academic year. That should be a wake up call for consumers, but probably doesn't come as a shock to college students.

Today, students at four-year public schools spend roughly 26 percent of their budgets on textbooks alone. At a 2-year public institution, that cost leaps to 72 percent for a full-time student.

These outrageous numbers confirm previous studies conducted by Student Public Interest Research Groups (Student PIRGs), a network of student organizations that determined that students spend an average of $900 a year on textbooks. At a community college, textbooks can cost as much as half of the annual tuition.

"Textbook prices have become even more of an issue than when you and I were in college," said Dave Rosenfeld, Program Director for Student PIRGs. Trying to turn the tide, Rosenfeld's group approached Congressman David Wu (D-OR), who in turn requested that the GAO conduct its own investigation. Since nearly half of all undergraduates currently receive some sort of federal financial aid, Congress certainly has a vested interest in the overall costs of college education.

Both Student PIRGs and the GAO found that the primary causes of skyrocketing textbook prices are development costs. Textbook publishers routinely "bundle," or package, textbooks with CD-ROMs, workbooks and other instructional supplements in order to jack up prices. "Bundling is a reasonably recent trend," Rosenfeld said, "and in our study for the last two years, we found that over half of college textbooks are now being packaged that way."

According to the GAO, the five major publishers who dominate the college textbook market claim that increases in part-time faculty at campuses nationwide has lead to increased demand for instructional supplements. The thinking there is that web-based tutorials, CD-ROMs, and self-assessment software will contribute to higher education. Yet, the fundamental flaw with that logic is that packaging these materials with textbooks automatically precludes students from purchasing less expensive used books.

Another major factor in the high cost of educational texts is the printing of unnecessary new editions. Ten years ago, publishers would generally revise their textbooks every 4 to 5 years, whereas today that revision cycle is down to 3 to 4 years. In the GAO report, publishers claimed that updated editions are necessary to defray the costs of their investments and keep material current for faculty members. Again, however, the onslaught of frequent revisions prevents students from seeking used alternatives.

Students aren't the only ones who are outraged by the preponderance of overpriced texts. As part of the Make Textbooks Available Campaign, 500 math and 200 physics professors signed letters to textbook publisher Thomson Learning, Inc., expressing grave concern over costly revised editions. "Considering the basics of calculus haven't changed much in many, many years," said Rosenfeld, "those faculty members had a valid point."

In the L.A. Times last Sunday, J. Bruce Hildebrand, Executive Director for Higher Education at the Association of American Publishers in Washington, responded to the GAO report. "Professors want these [supplemental] materials because it improves the success rate of their students. Yes, books can be expensive, but they don't have to be. We are like a car dealer. We ask do you want leather or do you want cloth? Do you want the cheap radio or the expensive one? Whatever you want, we've got it."


Digg!

Zack Pelta-Heller is a freelance writer living in Astoria, NY. Currently, he's an assistant editor for Dell Magazines.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
ECLECTICIST S JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Aug 25, 2005 4:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YOUR ARTICLE IS WELL TAKEN, SINCE AS AN UDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE STUDENT, THE PRICE OF BOOKS EXCEEDED MORE THAN 50 PER ENT OF MY TUITION COSTS...AND FOR A GUY WORKING HIS WAY THROUGH COLLEGE, THESE COSTS WERE AND ARE STILL UNFORGIVEABLE, ESPECIALLY FOR POOR OR ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED...
WHATS WRONG WITH STARTING A FREE LIBRARY FOR TEXT BOOKS AT THE COLLEGE???...AS A MEMBER OF THE FREE LIBRARY, BOOKS WERE CHECKED IN AT A NOMINAL FEE AND THE FEE RETURNED AT THE END OF THE SEMESTER WHEN YOU RETURNED THE BOOK IN GOOD CONDITION...YOUR ENTRY INTO THE FREE LIBRARY WOULD BE YOUR CONTRIBUTION OF YOUR BOOKS, ETC...
S...JIM...RODRIGUEZ+++THE ECLECTICIST+++

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wikibooks
Posted by: DRK on Aug 25, 2005 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This project from the Wikipedia, Wikibooks, may bring good textbooks in the future.
And there has been a lot of discussion regarding open-source books.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wikibooks Posted by: rhayes
FACULTY and STUDENTS - challenge the s.q.
Posted by: mikhail on Aug 25, 2005 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is incredible that most institutions purported to have the students' best interests at heart, have this "revenue centre" (the college bookstore) representing a HUGE conflict of interest. The more they sell, the better for ____ - WTF?

As a faculty member myself, I know we collectively need to be more creative, and stop being pigeon-holed into thinking we have to use a textbook, and remember what it was like way back when. For example, I recall in university feeling so cheated when a book had hardly been referred to, with little residual value after the exam period. Whatever happened to lectures and note taking?

There's this MYTH that books in technology need to be updated, but I can say as an engineer that the undergraduate experience requires more thinking and introspection, and less on flashy visuals and glossy fluff. I have my dad's civil engineering books from Cornell in the 60's that have more content in BW then today's multimedia multicoloured shelf fillers.

I'm encouraged by recent movements, like students organizing book swaps and notes libraries, and even the private sector developing resources like online publishing and netlibrary. This and more Schaum's outlines and sincere learning-teaching commitments could lessen the financial pain and marginally enhance the college academic experience.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Expensive textbooks
Posted by: CrystalD on Aug 25, 2005 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're not kidding when you said how expensive textbooks are! When I was attending community college, the books cost more than my tuition! I found I could save by buying books used, but for math and science courses I often had no choice but to buy new. For English and history classes I was often able to find books for quite cheap in used bookstores and online. However, math and science courses are still required even for us lit-major types and so I wound up breaking the bank for textbooks on more than one occasion.

It's just a way of squeezing money from students. The textbooks are often not even that good or informative, and there's really no reason to have new editions coming out almost every year. If it is a social science and there has been groundbreaking new research I can understand, but for algebra?

The "bundling" is a huge waste of money if you ask me. I have had to purchase bundled textbooks and I usually do not use the workbook and NEVER have used the CD. I don't know who they are fooling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Seems more like every year .. new books
Posted by: LoisC on Aug 25, 2005 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I went back to college (community) in 1985 it seemed like every year the books had to be new .. therefore the option to buy a used book was not possible.

I thought then it was horrible then how the publishers were getting away with charging so much for their books. And coming out with new editions every year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Publishers are treating the American textbook market like the Wild West
Posted by: Olympiada on Aug 25, 2005 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zack,
Thanks for this timely and humorous article. I am glad you mentioned the alternatives. I was going to post some, but I see you have already done that.
You know for me textbooks have never been a problem. There are so many ways to get around that problem. Borrow books, buy used, by on-line, sell back, use the book in the library, ask the teacher for a copy. That is not the problem. The problem for me is food, clothing, and shelter, well to really break it down, shelter. Paying the rent is the biggest problem in college. That is the way I see it.
Olympiada

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Textbook publishers make a tempting target [part 1]
Posted by: rgm2005 on Aug 25, 2005 4:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Textbook publishers make a tempting target, but I think this article is pretty thin on supporting logic. Think of this as the devils advocate report.

Textbook prices have risen faster than inflation, but what about the rising cost of paper? Printing? Royalties? How fast have these gone up? These factors should at least be considered before dumping responsibility on the publisher. Even more to the point, have publisher profit margins risen? Textbooks are known to have higher profit margins than trade books, but are textbook publishers jacking up those margins, or have they stayed about the same? If profit margins are about the same, it doesn’t seem fair to suddenly start accusing publishers of gouging students.

Next, the focus on bundles is also misleading. I have not heard of a book that is only available in a bundle. Faculty may order a bundle, and the college bookstore may stock it, but the student can buy the textbook alone – just go online. I’d be interested to hear about any publisher that refuses to sell their books ‘ala carte’ – I mean, if Congress is getting in on the act, that alone should make you think twice.

Publishers also get the blame for printing up new editions – presumably they should just keep the same edition in print until the used copies fall apart. I guess the problem here is that students faced with a new edition may actually have to buy a new copy of the book. Yes, that may impact the used book market, but doesn’t somebody have to buy new books for there to even be a used book market?

Publishers seem to be getting criticized for acting like a profit making business. Well, that’s what they are. They are not subsidized by the government, nor are they a monopoly racket. If the price of textbooks has risen to the point where it inflicts real pain on students, one might ask, why hasn’t price been a factor in competition between publishers? If the PIRGs want to accuse publishers of price fixing, they need to come out and say so. [end of part 1]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's talk about texts
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Aug 25, 2005 4:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clever story title, "Let's Talk About Texts." Last week I was browsing through my college bookstore and my mouth nearly dropped to my feet when I saw the prices of buying geography and German textbooks: A geography hardback was nealy $100 and one small German book was over $60! Mein Gott!
But clearly we know college textbooks are a racket like any other business, no matter how legitimate publishers try to concieve the idea.
Every year the cost of living-and getting an education keeps rising while our ability to pay for it remains a loftier goal-with a credit card. And as each year passes it makes it an elusive mission to go to school if they can't get a loan or if they work two jobs. I know some who are financing their education on credit. Yikes!
Solutions to making college education more affordable are coming into the forefront. If we don't make education affordable-AND accessible- there will be more children left behind. It's already happened.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bad practice
Posted by: tcunning on Aug 26, 2005 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand that the publishers need to make a living, but, while I was at University, I saw students and professors fighting scandalous practices at our campus bookstore. In several of my courses, the bookstore did not order the number of copies requested by the professors, anticipating that some students would shop elsewhere. That seems logical, but when the book is hard to find, classes have to be delayed until the bookstore re-orders (or the shipments from Amazon come in.) In the meantime, in our school anyway, a couple of professors admitted that they were not allowed to recommend another place to buy the books, because of a contractual agreement between the university and the bookstore. (Being good academics, they told us anyway:)
One language professor tried to defray our costs by ordering a cheap text from France; a pocket edition costing about $7. When the bookstore did not stock enough for the class, they tried to cover up by saying that the highly popular, ubiquitous (in France) book was out of print! Using her contacts, she called them on their boldfaced lie, eliciting an apology and, finally, our books. Four weeks into the semester.
As for professors who write/edit their own texts, students would be well advised to be wary. One professor I had required a bundled package for his class. Two of the books were written by him; one with fill-in-the-blank exercises. To get credit for the exercises, we had to RIP THE PAGE OUT OF THE BOOK! NO PHOTOCOPIES! Since the books were bundled, we could not sell back the other books at the end of the semester because one was damaged, and new students had to get the new package to get credit for the "homework." Luckily, students complained enough about this practice that he is no longer at the university, but it did take a couple years.
Despite this example, most of my professors tried to help their students with the burden of high book prices by allowing different editions and sources, as long as the text was the same. I know this is more of a problem for the math/science majors than for English majors like me, but students should always ask.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

blogmommy
Posted by: blogmommy on Aug 28, 2005 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the resale/recycle time frame for most textbooks seems to be measured in nanoseconds, my husband and I for years found them useful to hold up boards for bookshelves. I had noticed that my favorite thriftstores and book depositories often had large signs proclaiming "NO TEXTBOOKS". I already order my mom's medicines from Canada to save money; when my daughter starts grad school next year I'll suggest a family trip to Toronto and maybe we can even save the postage by doing a shopping trip there.
A thoughtful gift for your relative just starting college might be a bunch of British pound notes stuffed in a Happy Graduation envelope!
Thanks again Mr.Pelta-Heller for giving me yet something more to get pissed off about. Nelly Greenwald, PhD

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]