COMMENTS: 83
Preaching Justice, Slaying Demons
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
The event reached its climax when William Donohue of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights stomped onstage determined to deliver the evening's most bombastic attack line. Donohue was going to tell the crowd exactly who their enemy was, in no uncertain terms. He was going to name names. And so, in booming basso profundo, Donohue denounced "the atheist, anti-Catholic bigot" Christopher Hitchens. His salvo was greeted with befuddled silence. If there were a name with which the country-music-capital crowd had less familiarity, Donohue couldn't conjure it. For all they knew, if they knew anything about Hitchens, the neoconservative ex-Trotskyite bibulous Brit author of Letters to a Young Contrarian had produced a how-to manual in the style of James Dobson's "Dare to Discipline" for Christian parents to give to a naughty teenager evading an abstinence program.
Unfazed by the utter silence greeting his startling exorcism of the demon Hitchens, Donohue trundled ahead like a performance artist at the Greenwich Village Cafe Wha?. He declared that he studied under "the NYU Marxist Sidney Hook," evoking further deep bafflement in the crowd (NY Who?), then proposed "grief counselors" for liberals and finally posed a rhetorical question: "You remember that Bob Dylan song?" With that, the packed Baptist church turned into a Quaker meeting. It appeared that the Christian militants didn't recall "The Times, They Are A-Changin'." Maybe Donohue should have tried something from Dylan's early country phase, like "Lay, Lady, Lay."
Zell Miller followed Donohue at the microphone. The turncoat former Democratic governor of Georgia had been the keynote speaker at last year's Republican National Convention, where he shouted that Democrats wanted to arm the military with "spitballs." Now he engaged in what seemed like a game show whose point appeared to be to yell at the top of his lungs as many mixed metaphors in the shortest time possible. Liberalism, Miller said, had "kidnapped the baby Jesus's halo," "treat[ed] marriage like an outdated Hula-Hoop" and "hauled off" the Constitution "in a garbage truck." He made no references to Dylan songs.
Next up was Charles Colson, the convicted Watergate dirty-trickster turned evangelical Christian prison pastor, who humbly claimed that Justice Sunday II was doing nothing but "giving voice" to Martin Luther King Jr.'s philosophy. Colson pleaded for charity and understanding before reverting to type. "The same people who supported King are against us," he said. That appeal to antipathy drew one of the few bursts of spontaneous applause of the evening.
Indeed, Justice Sunday II was about a lot of things -- still-simmering resentment against the civil rights movement, for example -- but it was hardly about John Roberts. As Donohue declared, "We need to go beyond Roberts."
Roberts's smiling visage was flashed on the church's big screen, but he didn't garner a ringing endorsement from Justice Sunday II's most prominent personality, James Dobson, the founder of Focus on the Family. "It looks like John Roberts is, and we think so, a strict constructionist," Dobson said during a videotaped appearance. "For now, at least, he looks good." Gone were the senators' phone numbers flashed across the screen during Justice Sunday I. Emcee Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, was not urging viewers to dial their Congressman, as he did before. Justice Sunday II's planners pointedly neglected to present a giant-size portrait of Roberts beside the dais, as they did for each of Bush's stalled federal judiciary picks two months ago. Somewhere between his nomination and Justice Sunday II, John Roberts had become the redheaded stepchild in the Christian right's basement.
Roberts's reputation plummeted in Christian right circles on August 4, when the Los Angeles Times reported his pro bono work on behalf of gay rights activists in Romer v. Evans, a 1996 case that declared unconstitutional a Colorado ballot initiative that would have permitted landlords and employers to discriminate against homosexuals. Though Roberts didn't argue Romer before the Supreme Court, two lawyers who worked with him on the case said he played an instrumental role in preparing their argument. Strangely, when Roberts was asked by the Senate Judiciary Committee, just days before the LA Times article appeared, to describe "specific instances" in which he performed pro bono work, he forgot to mention Romer.
Roberts may have had good reason for reticence. After all, there are few straight men as obsessed with homosexuals as Bush's most fervent grassroots backers on judicial appointments, the stars of Justice Sunday. In 2002 Dobson distributed a newsletter that included tips for fathers to prevent their sons from becoming gay. It included this instruction: "He can even take his son with him into the shower, where the boy cannot help but notice that Dad has a penis, just like his, only bigger."
In 2004 Perkins's Family Research Council released a pamphlet, "The Slippery Slope of Same-Sex Marriage," introduced with the tale of a Missouri man who wants to marry his horse. "The logic of his argument is remarkably similar to that employed by advocates of homosexual marriage," the pamphlet states. Perkins recently told a reporter from the Vancouver Sun, "You ask anybody that's investigated homosexual murders and without question they are the most violent... even the sex act itself is violent in homosexuals." (Such comments contradict a claim made on Dobson's Focus on Your Child website that boys who are becoming gay "dislike the roughhousing that other boys enjoy.")
With the revelation of Roberts's involvement in the Romer case, right-wing activists began jumping ship. The leader of a Virginia antigay group, Public Advocate, yanked support with the declaration, "'Freedom' is not embracing perversion." Joseph Farah, editor of the heavily trafficked far-right webzine WorldNetDaily, attacked Justice Sunday's planners in thinly veiled language in an August 12 column: "We now have 'conservative' organizations leading the fight for confirmation of a man [Roberts] who is certain to be a grave disappointment to them." Perhaps most important, Gary Bauer, the former Family Research Council president who built the organization into one of Washington's largest conservative operations during the 1990s, denounced the Bush White House in his daily newsletter for picking a "stealth nominee" and questioned their refusal to release 50,000 pages of Reagan-era Roberts documents.
The position of Justice Sunday II's organizers consisted of halfhearted apologia through gritted teeth. "The Romer case was perhaps one of the most egregious decisions ever handed down by the Supreme Court... and to have Roberts be part of that in any way was troubling," Dobson said during an August 8 appearance on Fox News's Hannity & Colmes. But, Dobson assured the audience, "he had a very minor role." When host Sean Hannity peppered him with questions about Roberts's role on Romer, Dobson was forced to concede that "the Republican senators need to vet him [Roberts] also." It was a stunning role reversal, considering that Dobson and his allies had spent the past month attacking Democratic senators who vowed to question Roberts's views on social issues.
While Perkins echoed Dobson's "concern" over Roberts, he was not about to miss the opportunity to use his nomination as a cash cow. In early August, while Roberts was wrapping up a series of cordial meetings with Senate Democrats, the Family Research Council sent a mass mailing soliciting donations to combat "a secret liberal strategy" to destroy Roberts. A breathless, bold-print e-mail pitch followed on August 11 for "very large contributions" -- upward of $1,000 -- to "strike a great blow against judicial activism." That same week, Perkins sent another solicitation to help raise $150,000 he claimed Justice Sunday II would cost. For Perkins, who pays himself $171,000 a year, battling activist judges is a very personal crusade.
Justice Sunday II presented promotional opportunities for its other stars as well. Three speakers, Zell Miller, Phyllis Schlafly and Chuck Colson, have just released new books, easy-to-read jeremiads bemoaning America's descent into secular depravity. For them, the event meant face-time with their target consumers.
House Republican majority leader Tom DeLay leaped at the chance to fill in for the disinvited Senate majority leader Bill Frist, who lost the Christian right's mandate of heaven when he delivered a floor speech in favor of stem cell research and against President Bush's restrictions. In March, at a Family Research Council meeting, DeLay had cast his legal problems as the result of a cunning left-wing scheme to bring down the conservative movement.
Now, as his close personal friend über-lobbyist Jack Abramoff faces numerous indictments on corruption charges, DeLay lathers himself in moral piety. "The moral values that have defined the progress of human civilization for millennia are cast aside by a small number of judges," DeLay said on Justice Sunday II.
Meanwhile, the White House, hoping to reinvigorate the Christian right's support for Roberts, released his Reagan-era memos -- for example, criticizing the Supreme Court's rulings against school prayer -- though it is still withholding tens of thousands of pages demanded by the Senate Judiciary Committee. The maneuver may have been too little, too late, at least to buttress the unshakable faith of the religious right. Not only did Justice Sunday II reflect the Christian right's wavering support for Roberts, it also revealed a subtle yet concerted effort by its leadership to unhitch its wagon from Bush's suddenly falling star. Dobson, Perkins and company are taking the long view, looking toward the next Supreme Court vacancy, the next election cycle and beyond that to dominating influence over the direction of the Republican Party and the country.
The true underlying agenda of Justice Sunday II was undisguised in the rousing speech given by Bishop Harry Jackson. "We need to tell both parties, 'It's our way or the highway,'" Jackson told the cheering crowd. "You and I can bring the ruling reign of the cross to America."
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on Aug 22, 2005 3:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That *is* the right symbol for what the want from government.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "The ruling reign of the cross"
Posted by: frost
» RE: "The ruling reign of the cross"
Posted by: Edward George
» The Bible; New blueprint for Southern Secession
Posted by: Badlawdog
» RE: The Bible; New blueprint for Southern Secession
Posted by: Ellie1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: owlbear1 on Aug 22, 2005 4:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How much longer before we can consider what NEEDS to be done as 'Self-Defense'?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Watching them Revel in their Delusions is SCARY!!!
Posted by: shakti_warrior
» RE: Watching them Revel in their Delusions is SCARY!!!
Posted by: aswgt@ix.netcom.com
» RE: Watching them Revel in their Delusions is SCARY!!!
Posted by: Edward George
» RE: Watching them Revel in their Delusions is SCARY!!!
Posted by: aswgt@ix.netcom.com
» RE: Watching them Revel in their Delusions is SCARY!!!
Posted by: kingfelix
» RE: Watching them Revel in their Delusions is SCARY!!!
Posted by: aswgt@ix.netcom.com
» RE: Watching them Revel in their Delusions is SCARY!!!
Posted by: kingfelix
» RE: Watching them Revel in their Delusions is SCARY!!!
Posted by: Scott
Comments are closed-
Posted by: churchofone on Aug 22, 2005 4:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobdotj on Aug 22, 2005 5:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: betterfuture on Aug 22, 2005 5:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Using Jesus's name for such evil and hatred should not be tolerated by the rest of us
Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: FutureOutlook
Posted by: Roverton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LMNOP on Aug 22, 2005 6:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eileen_flmng on Aug 22, 2005 6:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These limited Christians who base morality on a womans personal choice to bring life into the world and their judgements about the mystery of love and marriage are not at all what Christ was about.
Where is their moral outrage over nuclear proliferation when Chrsit promised; "The peacemakers shall be called the children of God."
Where is their moral outrage over the desecration of Creation; from war and global warming?
Where is their moral outrage over the fact that the Bible contains over 3,000 references to help the poor and oppresed and nothing about seeking political power and control?
Progressive and moderate Christians in USA have been silent far too long and have allowed the right wing fundamentally minded conservatives to be the voice of Christianity.
As a Christian of The Beatitudes I challenge and confront the ideology of the Justice Sunday crowd with a reminder;
"What does the Lord require? Do Justice, love mercy and walk humbly with your God."-Micah 6:8
-www.wearewideawake.org
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» their judgements about the mystery of love and marriage
Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: their judgements about the mystery of love and marriage
Posted by: beetruetoyou
» RE: their judgements about the mystery of love and marriage
Posted by: eileen_flmng
» Thank you for the support
Posted by: Olympiada
» So Good!
Posted by: aswgt@ix.netcom.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: patriotgal on Aug 22, 2005 6:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Off the Deep End
Posted by: D78
» these guys have jumped way off the deep end
Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: these guys-from agitator church and state
Posted by: eileen_flmng
» RE: Off the Deep End
Posted by: Roverton
» RE: Off the Deep End
Posted by: Roverton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: moogyboy on Aug 22, 2005 6:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As always happens, the Christian Right appears to be setting themselves up for a backlash. It's happening to the GOP, too. Those gregarious "life of the party" types who start to shout and get belligerent are generally shown the door eventually.
I don't think the majority of Americans are going to care for these bozos' my-way-or-the-highway arrogance.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 5by5 on Aug 22, 2005 7:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(I'm confused. Are you trying to help Liberals by admitting you're a racist pig?)
In 2002 Dobson distributed a newsletter that included tips for fathers to prevent their sons from becoming gay. It included this instruction: "He can even take his son with him into the shower, where the boy cannot help but notice that Dad has a penis, just like his, only bigger."
(????????? So the "cure" for homosexuality is.... pedophilia???? Wha??? Man, get this guy a padded room and a nice straight jacket. So to speak.)
In 2004 Perkins's Family Research Council released a pamphlet, "The Slippery Slope of Same-Sex Marriage," introduced with the tale of a Missouri man who wants to marry his horse.
(Did they miss Ellen Degeneres' hilarious goat bit? There is no slope here, people. Slippery or otherwise.)
Romer v. Evans, a 1996 case that declared unconstitutional a Colorado ballot initiative that would have permitted landlords and employers to discriminate against homosexuals. --- With the revelation of Roberts's involvement in the Romer case, right-wing activists began jumping ship. The leader of a Virginia antigay group, Public Advocate, yanked support with the declaration, "'Freedom' is not embracing perversion."
(But putting up an employment sign that says, "Faggots need not apply" is just spiffy for democracy. Do these people even hear themselves speak? Why mess around, start segregating water fountains now.... Especially since some of you lunatics have said homosexuality is "in the water" in Massachussetts.)
Not only did Justice Sunday II reflect the Christian right's wavering support for Roberts, it also revealed a subtle yet concerted effort by its leadership to unhitch its wagon from Bush's suddenly falling star.
(Plummeting is the word you're looking for here. PLUMMETING.)
The true underlying agenda of Justice Sunday II was undisguised in the rousing speech given by Bishop Harry Jackson. "We need to tell both parties, 'It's our way or the highway,'" Jackson told the cheering crowd. "You and I can bring the ruling reign of the cross to America."
(Behold, the Christian Taliban unfurls it's burkha!)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Injustice Sunday
Posted by: nakis
» RE: Injustice Sunday
Posted by: beetruetoyou
» RE: Injustice Sunday
Posted by: rfirgens
» RE: Injustice Sunday
Posted by: Scott
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kelly.nickell on Aug 22, 2005 8:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Roberts appeared to me to be a pick that was completely out of character for this administration. I asked myself why they had picked a man that seems at least superfluously or upon perfunctory analysis to be qualified for the job. That is exactly the point; the Christian fundamentalist should spend a little more time reading outside of the incestuous stick that leads to an innate misunderstanding of the law, the bible, and exactly why an American government really doesn’t need to concern itself with what godless diddling the minions practice on themselves, when the greater concern is how they can continue to keep an increasingly uneducated populace in line long enough to “starve the beast” i.e. big government that threatens to reveal its true color and perhaps realize it has become a plutocracy, to the horror of all of those that continue take their money home in dump trucks as opposed to penny rollers.
I digress. Maybe Presidente Arbusto was lashing out at the controls of his handlers, realizing with his own child-like flair that he could nominate anyone he wants, James Dobson wasn’t gonna screw up his pick. This is his party; play right or go home.
Sorry for the butchery - KN.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Robespierre on Aug 22, 2005 8:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But these speakers are not crazy, they are experts at playing up the fears and prejudices of the ignorant mass of worshippers, and using that fear to further their own power and influence (aka: cha-ching! show me the money!). We should not dismiss the leaders of this kind of movement as lunatics, that kind of labelling and dismissal is the same mistake the Bush administration made with bin Laden, al-Zawahiri, and every other Islamic leader who has opposed us in the Middle East.
To dismiss their arguments as the rambling nonsense of madmen ignores the actual power their arguments have upon their listeners. To counter these kinds of threats to religious freedom in this country, we must pay close attention to the tactics they use to inspire mortal terror in their congregations.
Most likely the average listener to one of these sermons struggles with financial difficulties from unemployment or terrible wages, cannot or can barely afford medical insurance, lives in a culturally isolated part of the country, and is poorly educated. These people don't understand what causes the suffering in their lives; like all of us they are looking the answer to why bad things happen.
Well, you're in luck partner because here's the easy answer, your misery is caused by all these minority, gay, foreign, liberal, atheist people over here! Boy isn't that just so simple, now if we only can get rid of them, all problems for you will cease!
It is very easy to get people to believe in something like this, that instead of looking toward fixing governmental policy and class inequalities which take great quantities of time and effort, it's far easier to just blame the person who is of a different race, religion, or lifestyle than yourself for all your problems.
We have got to face the leadership of these kinds of movements square in the eye and address the root cause of the fear and stress that push their congregations into these kinds of feelings of anger and intolerance. People dismissed Hitler as just a crazy rambling extremist for over a decade, and next thing ya know, he was running the country.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Crazy as a fox
Posted by: Riverside
» your misery is caused by all these minority
Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: your misery is caused by all these minority
Posted by: cyclone
» Be careful when you start suggesting that the "ethnic minorities" are at all responsible for this
Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Be careful when you start suggesting that the "ethnic minorities" are at all responsible for this
Posted by: cyclone
» being in the HIV field
Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: being in the HIV field
Posted by: cyclone
» soul on ice
Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: soul on ice
Posted by: cyclone
» We all get beat up - everywhere!
Posted by: Olympiada
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cottontail on Aug 22, 2005 9:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Bush and these bible-thumping crazies---birds of a feather
Posted by: Olympiada
» real Christianity?
Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: real Christianity?
Posted by: beetruetoyou
» or the lofty, idealistic version which about eight people actually embody
Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: real Christianity?
Posted by: Scott
» the life YOU live causes OTHERS to come to you - yes!
Posted by: Olympiada
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bookwoman on Aug 22, 2005 9:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: amandaleigh on Aug 22, 2005 11:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dr. Jerry Sutton, local pastor: "The most religious nation in the world is India. The least religious nation in the world is Sweden. We're a nation of Indians, ruled by Swedes."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: favorite quote
Posted by: Edward George
» RE: favorite quote
Posted by: astockton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: spacecadet on Aug 22, 2005 12:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a relatively centerist to progressive Republican Party in one
state.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cyclone on Aug 22, 2005 2:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Olympiada on Aug 22, 2005 3:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Focus on the Family
Posted by: beetruetoyou
» Be strong and speak up
Posted by: Olympiada
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ratmonster Spook on Aug 22, 2005 3:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I were to say that this would bother me I would be lying.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» If this means the destruction of all organized religions then so be it.
Posted by: Olympiada
» But it Doesn't
Posted by: aswgt@ix.netcom.com
» angry Jesus-phobic Liberal smarty-pants
Posted by: Olympiada
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DavidTbone on Aug 22, 2005 3:19 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The New Testament tells that many people will come falsely in God's name. We must judge them by the fruit that they bear.
I dont think they grow much fruit in Texas.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The New Testament tells that many people will come falsely in God's name.
Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: The New Testament tells that many people will come falsely in God's name.
Posted by: beetruetoyou
» Jim Wallis' Sojourner articles
Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Jim Wallis' Sojourner articles
Posted by: beetruetoyou
» Don't let them destroy your soul
Posted by: Olympiada
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 22, 2005 3:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't this the why Southpark creators made heaven only for the Mormons... the only faith that got it right, which was built apon by a racial lie predicated by a schziophrenic?
I don't get it, the land of the free should put individual freedom first... a good person is good by actions and deeds and is not identified by race, creed, faith or sexual orientation.
If we can deny a woman the choice of one thing, how long will it take before all are denied a choice of anything?
From prohibition to powder keg, organized crime is making laws that affect the many while enriching the few... whats the matter with you people, does the Rapture got your tongue? Do the minutemen truely have you covered?
Don't you see the 2nd civil war is coming if not already apon you?
I thank God that I'm a Confederate (not a rebel but a loyalist) where freedom of choice isn't corrupted by non-people (corporate lobbist's) and where only citizens are allowed to make political contributions.
Some believe if you think it, it will happen, but right now even free thought is under siege in your Dis-Union (e.g. intelligent design)
shame on you all... and shame on me for having to rant about common sense.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Aug 22, 2005 5:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The time will come when these Pharisees will be thrown out of their churches, just as Jesus personally drove the money changers from the temple.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: astockton on Aug 22, 2005 7:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Emancipator on Aug 22, 2005 8:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» religious fanatics are the true corruptors
Posted by: Olympiada
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mebadgett on Aug 23, 2005 3:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our god is marching on.
The Battle Hymn of the Republic, Updated
http://xrl.us/g8hv
Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
– Benjamin Franklin
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eosinglemum on Aug 24, 2005 1:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
eosinglemum
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
My Experience with a Psychedelic Plant That Thousands Have Used for Release from Severe Addictions
Is Using a Checklist the Answer to All Your Problems?
On Anniversary of Iraq Invasion, Time to Rethink Anti-War Activism




