Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Alone In America

By Amanda Levinson, AlterNet. Posted August 23, 2005.


Thousands of unaccompanied children head to the United States each year seeking the American Dream, but they're increasingly at the mercy of an uncaring immigration system.
Alone In America
Alone In America
Advertisement

Javier is 15 years old and deeply in debt to his smuggler. "I came here because I am poor and I want to buy some land for my parents" he says, rubbing his hands together nervously as he sits in the library of a detention facility for immigrant youth in California. "They are old and cannot work ... I am paying debt. It is rising every day. But what can I do? Nothing. I am here."

Two months ago, Javier and his parents promised a smuggler from their hometown in Guatemala that they would pay him $4000, with interest, if he would transport Javier to North Carolina, where the boy's brother lives. There, he planned to work for a few years to and save enough money to buy his parents a little piece of land. That dream ended in Arizona ten weeks after he left home, when Javier was arrested in an immigration raid on a house where he was staying.

Every year, thousands of youth like Javier risk their lives to come to the United States alone. Our nation's most vulnerable immigrants, when they are arrested, find themselves thrown into a confusing immigration system that simultaneously embraces and rejects the idea of child welfare, a system that treats them as something between child and adult, victim and criminal.

Across the country, the number of youth in detention is rising, and the vast majority never has access to legal representation. Many are housed in facilities hours from legal service providers, and states like Texas and Arizona have only one full-time staff attorney for the hundreds of minors detained there. There is also growing evidence that some children who have been labeled as unaccompanied in actuality have been forcibly separated from their parents by Border Patrol, a practice that has alarmed some lawmakers and calls into question whether funds are being used improperly by the two federal agencies charged with the protection of these children.

A Growing Phenomenon

In the past four years, the number of unaccompanied children taken into custody by immigration officials has increased by nearly 30 percent, from 4,600 in 2000 to 6,200 in 2004, and is expected to surpass 7,000 this year.

While the increase in apprehensions of children can partially be attributed to the new emphasis on border security and immigration enforcement after 9/11, the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), a federal agency charged with the care, custody and placement of unaccompanied children through its Unaccompanied Children's Services, also points to deteriorating socioeconomic conditions in the children's countries of origin. Over three quarters of the unaccompanied children arrested last year came from Central America, a region where children are often mired in a cycle of crushing poverty, violent homes, and forced conscription into street gangs.

According to the ORR, most unaccompanied youth in their custody are Central American males between the ages of 15 and 17, although children of all ages and from most regions of the world can be found in the agency's care.

Alex is from Honduras, the poorest country in Central America according to the Economic Commission on Latin America, with 79 percent of its population living in poverty. The Office of Refugee Resettlement granted interviews with Alex and other youth for this article under the condition that their names be changed and their locations not be revealed.

At 18 years old, Alex is soft-spoken yet direct, with carefully coiffed hair and a hint of a mustache. He wears two gold chains around his neck, one with a dolphin charm, another with a heart that says, "I love mom."

When he was 10 years old, his father was stabbed to death by two of Alex's uncles. Alex found the body.

"They killed my father to rob him of the money he had made from selling a cow. For this reason they killed him," he said softly.

Although everybody in his town knew who had killed his father, nobody, not even Alex's grandmother, dared to turn them in. People were afraid of his uncles, who were drug users, and did not trust the authorities to investigate the crime and bring them to justice.

With his mother living in the United States and his grandmother unable to work, Alex was forced to quit school and start working on farms, making bricks, building houses -- anything he could to support himself and his three younger brothers. But his uncles were still hanging around, and Alex wanted to turn them in to the authorities. His family refused.


Digg!

Amanda Levinson is an independent journalist in Somerville, Massachusetts who researches domestic and international immigration policy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Shouldn't Mexico be footing the bill?
Posted by: fenster on Aug 23, 2005 4:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, instead it's the evil Americans who should be doing it. We're evil. EVIL!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» evil Posted by: Olympiada
Conservative compassion from the Heartland
Posted by: sausage on Aug 23, 2005 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iowa U.S. Rep. Steve King:"...a 10-foot-tall chain-link fence topped with razor wire would be a good start."
The Des Moines Register
U.S. Rep. Steve King said Monday he's not ready to propose building a wall between the United States and Mexico, but a 10-foot-tall chain-link fence topped with razor wire would be a good start.
(snip)
...[T]he main argument from King and others was that illegal immigration hurts the U.S. economy by encouraging the use of disproportionately cheap labor.

Now, get this boys and girls, Rep. King owns a construction company. Yet according to an article in the August 8, 2005 edition of the online bizjouranals.com:"Experts say because construction companies have a difficult time filling labor jobs with U.S.-born employees, many of these workers are immigrants - undocumented, as well as documented."

I wonder how many undocumented laborers Rep. King has manning shovels out in the hot western Iowa summer sun?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Absolutely heartbreaking
Posted by: Olympiada on Aug 23, 2005 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article was just that, absolutely heartbreaking. And when I read it, I felt a total sense of powerlessness. This cause needs people to give their lives over for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Absolutely heartbreaking Posted by: helnschool
This is heartbreaking
Posted by: nakis on Aug 23, 2005 9:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So many people seeking a better life. How many of them do things they know are wrong but are just struggling to survive.

If you want an example of why free trade, NAFTA, CAFTA, privatization are bad for humanity just look at the increasing numbers of people having to leave the nations that are being most affected by these Godsends of the wealthy-elite.
If these programs really help these people then why is their condition worsening? Why are there social structures decaying?
People turn to negative actions because they lack the basics. Violence is bred by economic disparty and depravation.
The influx of immigrants is only a symptom of the peoples to our south loosing their livelihoods, farms, dignity.
And what is the answer? Private militias turning them back with violence? Large fences and walls?
That's just treating the symptoms. If we turned our focus around. Looked at the guilty parties causing this we could make a change. The peoples of the south wouldn't want to leave their land, family, friends if what prosperity they had wasn't being stolen from them. Cure the illness. Don't treat the symptom. The symptoms are only going to get worse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does it still take a village to raise a child, even if the child is illegal?
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Aug 23, 2005 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The immigrant child probably has the toughest life around. This story should open more eyes in the United States, but the problem is that many of us don't live near the border to fully comprehend what crossing that (imaginary) line means for kids.
This type of drama occured thorought the Middle Ages as children sought to escape poverty and slavery. There weren't too many viable options for kids then, but now the passage for immigrant children to America is like an obscure passage in Dante's "Divine Comedy."
The dangers they face and their tribulations are far from what we see and read. Children are introduced into the unknown. And it's no safe journey on a freight train. No Amtrak service through the jungles of Central America.
The saddest part is not only the abuse, but the fact that they have to make this trip to provide for their families. And when they arrive they're herded into detention centers-or out on the streets. But there are some good stories stemming from it.
And while it's nearly impossible to stop human movement it IS possible to make a better life for these kids. And we're left to ponder does is still take a village to raise a child?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dante's "Divine Comedy." Posted by: Olympiada
An Amazing Concept...
Posted by: ijbevwofok@mailinator.com on Aug 23, 2005 12:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Identify those who are in this country illegally, and deport them.

If the people of the US decide that for economic or humanitarian reasons they want to permit more people to come in legally, fine.

The issue isn't whether or not it sucks to be South of the border; The issue is whether or not the US has the right to control its own borders.

Wanting a better life is no excuse for breaking the law... I'd like a better life myself, and the cash in that bank vault would go along way towards my goal... Is robbery OK now, too?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For All Those Currently In the United States
Posted by: nazrafel on Aug 23, 2005 1:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It might be appropriate to think about how OUR families came here (those who weren't dragged over in chains, anyway). Personally, mine escaped Russia from a little village on the Volga just after the revolution (and just before they started shipping folks like us to Siberia). Had my family- poor, illiterate and non-English speaking, not been afforded the ability to come to the US- we probably would not have survived WWII or more than a couple Siberian winters. In retrospect it is amazing that we received visas at all- we were exactly the people that everyone wants to keep out now. The only reason we did receive visas is because there were more available and they were more easily obtainable (for white Europeans anyway) then they are now (for just about anyone who isn't buying an investor's green card for hundreds of thousands of dollars). We came to the US, raised a family, paid taxes, became good citizens, and sent children to college. All because we started here with the knowledge that we wouldn't be shipped back to rot in a gulag. We were poor, but weren't hunted by INS, and that makes ALL the difference. Yes, immigration should be managed, yes- people coming in should be legal- but having had personally experience with the immigration process (which I am sure the complainers on the board have not) I can assure you that the system is byzintinian and complex beyond imagining, even to a born, English speaking American like me. It needs to be simplified, additional resources need to allocated and the American public needs to educate themselves on the U.S. foreign policies that are forcing these people from their homes and families. They aren't coming here because their one bedroom house back home is too small and they want the big American house and 2 cars. They are coming here because at home they can't afford to EAT and more often than not are living in poverty and dangerous conditions. What human being would not risk life and limb to ensure that their children would have a chance at something better? Can anyone tell me that were you under the same conditions you would obay the law rather than fight and do everything you could to see your children grow up in a country that (at least pretends) to protect individual freedom and life?
-Continued-

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pope george ringo
Posted by: sully on Aug 23, 2005 4:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason Mexicans and others are streaming over the border is not just because of US foreign policy. It is because of OVERPOPULATION!!! I don't understand why nobody significant, left or right, is addressing this issue. Overpopulation is why the Rainforest is being chopped down for farmland. Overpopulation is why Arab youth everywhere are turning into unemployed terrorists. Overpopulation is why the Mediterranean is Europe's Rio Grande. Look at almost any country right now in the so called "developing world" and see if their population statistics haven't increased exponentially in the last few decades. Most women have 6 or more children (more like 10 or 12 or more. Bin laden was 17th of 52 children! What does that tell you about Saudi Arabia?)

OK, I know population is not the only factor , but it is the major one. And what does the West do about it? Send in Pope John Paul 2 (and his Hitler Youth successor) to preach the evils of contraception and abortion! Other faiths are equally guilty in this regard. Does Sally Struthers include Birth Control in her "Save the Children" fund? Don't even start me on Bushie's "Abstinence Only" policies.

Seriously folks, unless we start some worldwide anti-population initiative now, we are doomed to consume ourselves to death.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: pope george ringo Posted by: mmark
» RE: pope george ringo Posted by: scsmith
» RE: pope george ringo Posted by: nakis
» RE: pope george ringo Posted by: scsmith
The callousness of this solopsistic navel-gaving society
Posted by: mmark on Aug 23, 2005 7:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In this post-nuclear age, the United States continues to betray its fundamental roots as a welcoming nation of immigrants and refugees. Where is the compassionate conservatism the nation was promised by its elected leader and this administration? Is it only for Terry Shiavo and unborn fetuses? What do we say to the world about who we are as a nation by beating up and victimizing innocent children who seek the American Dream? Our self-absorption and callousness has only backfired in foreign policy. Consider that the dictatorship of China now is more favorably viewed by a majority of the globe's inhabitants than the United States. The United States should lead based on positive principles and values. Otherwise, this is clearly a decadent Empire in the throes of decline.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]