Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

When Lost Is Found

By Mark Engler, In These Times. Posted August 20, 2005.


A review of "A Field Guide to Getting Lost," by Rebecca Solnit.
Getting Lost
Getting Lost

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Mark Engler

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

On the surface, it would seem that getting lost requires little instruction, and that few of us would want to improve whatever talent for it we might possess. But in her new book, A Field Guide to Getting Lost, Rebecca Solnit offers a compelling case for a state more commonly avoided than aspired to. Early on she quotes theorist Walter Benjamin: "Not to find one's way in a city may well be uninteresting and banal. It requires ignorance -- nothing more. But to lose oneself in a city -- as one loses oneself in a forest -- that calls for quite a different schooling."

Through a series of loosely intertwined personal essays, Field Guide aims both to give us the necessary education in existential abandon, and to explain the merits of this state of mind. Solnit writes, "To lose yourself: a voluptuous surrender, lost in your arms, lost to the world, utterly immersed in what is present so that its surroundings fade away. In Benjamin's terms, to be lost is to be fully present, and to be fully present is to be capable of being in uncertainty and mystery."

Solnit's concern with consciousness and identity opens a broad terrain. A writer could go in many different directions in describing the processes of losing the self and then finding it again. That's precisely what Solnit does. Her style is tangential, associative. She jumps from analyzing the movie Vertigo and its love affair with the San Francisco Bay Area, where she lives, to discussing a love affair of her own in the Mojave desert, to recounting the story of the Spanish conquistador Cabeza de Vaca. This explorer, after being hopelessly lost in the American interior, spent years wandering in search of his countrymen, only to discover, once he found them, that he had more in common with the native peoples he had come to admire than with their colonizers.

Solnit is idiosyncratic and learned. Of her young adulthood, she writes, "Punk rock had burst into my life with the force of revelation, though I cannot now call the revelation much more than a tempo and an insurrectionary intensity that matched the explosive pressure in my psyche," and then she unexpectedly draws into her punk world Keats, Nabokov, Borges and the Road Warrior. You can only guess whether she will next plumb meaning from a friend's off-handed remark or a passage out of Thoreau.

Amid her free-form meandering, you quickly detect a sense of control. The guiding intelligence of Solnit's personal essays recalls Annie Dillard, while her naturalist's affection for the Southwestern desert and the Great Salt Lake are reminiscent of Terry Tempest Williams. Then again, Solnit herself is no neophyte. Prior to Field Guide, she published eight books, including Savage Dreams, a work rooted in her anti-nuclear activism at the Nevada Test Site, and River of Shadows, a book about photographer Eadweard Muybridge that won the Nation Book Critics Circle Award.

Solnit's profile as a political writer has risen considerably over the past couple years, in part due to Tom Engelhardt, whose TomDispatch.com distributes not only his own essays focusing on the U.S. occupation of Iraq, but also work by authors he has befriended, Solnit prominent among them. Out of her essays for TomDispatch came her eighth book, Hope in the Dark, a primer on activism in foreboding times.

"I'm concerned she can get away with saying things that aren't true because they're pretty," a friend said to me of that earlier book. This seems like a genuine risk. Those of us who have grown weary of less-than-critical celebrations of "Internet organizing" and the revolutionary power of anarchist-inspired Temporary Autonomous Zones will find a few sources of complaint in Solnit's treatise on hope. Yet there are many more things in that slim volume that are as truthful as they are poetic: "Causes and effects assume history marches forward," she writes, "but history is not an army. It is a crab scuttling sideways, a drip of soft water wearing away a stone, an earthquake breaking centuries of tension."

With her new Field Guide, Solnit earns our confidence with the strength of her personal reflections and cultural insights. She reminds us that our word "lost" comes from the Old Norse los, "meaning the disbanding of an army, and this origin suggests soldiers falling out of formation to go home, a truce with the wide world." She adds: "I worry now that many people never disband their armies, never go beyond what they know." It is, no doubt, a warranted fear. And it should make us hope that Solnit finds many pupils for her tutelage in the unknown, which proves both beautiful and true.

Digg!

Mark Engler, a writer based in New York City, can be reached at DemocracyUprising.com. This article appears with permission of the author.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Canadian Border restrictions
Posted by: Badlawdog on Aug 20, 2005 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not exactly on topic, but I wanted to warn folks that if they are planning on maybe, trying to go get lost in Canada this summer, to think again. On the Canadian border, your social security number will be run through NCIC computers, and if anything shows up, you will not be allowed to enter Canada. And don't think NCIC records will be accurate either cause they won't. Not guilty, or dismissed offenses appear as CONVICTIONS, and even misdemeanor charges will keep you out. I just went through a horrible experience at the crossing at Pembina ND, and another thing is the US Border Patrol now has a policy that if your denied entry into Canada, they will tear your car and luggage up on the way back into the US. Canada for human rights? my ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get outta here!
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 20, 2005 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We, Americans, are suckers for a "How To..." book. The reviewer here suggests that this book’s theme is about “losing the self and then finding it again.” I have just come from another site where the book "God without Religion" was also favorably reviewed. The theme there is the “expansive self.” But losing, finding, and expanding are not the main problem; “self” is what we cannot agree on.

In both reviews, no justification is offered for the authors’ assumptions (if not presumptions) that we all know what “self” really means. I hope they will tell philosophers and psychologists what that might be, as both those disciplines have been in an uproar about the meaning of “self” for more than 200 years, at least since David Hume (and going back to Plato).

Individual words do have dictionary meanings, but those are always multiple and varied and depend on their context. The old Anglo-Saxon word "los" actually has a zillion meanings. Most familiar probably is "Was ist los?" meaning, what's happening? or what's up? when used in the interrogative. Or “Get outta here,” in the injunctive, as the reviewer notes, "Get lost."

Furthermore, even the context for meaning is then trumped by the user’s beliefs, as philosopher Donald Davidson made clear. Neither of those can be understood without the other, so communication is always necessarily a guessing game.

In other words, we don't need to be taught how to get lost. We always begin by being lost, and that’s where we end up, too. The reviewers of both books 'bought into' the authors' pretense to offer an explanation of some kind (rather than they are only telling us how we can be more like them if we try hard enough). So in the end, we are advised one more time, as Twain remarked, “Whoever carries a cat home by the tail is sure to learn something.” Duh uh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get outta here! Posted by: fnokes