Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

One State at a Time

By Rose Aguilar, AlterNet. Posted August 23, 2005.


Mississippi Democrats are showing the potential power of Howard Dean's '50-state strategy' to take back national politics.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Rose Aguilar

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It's been six months since Howard Dean visited Jackson, Mississippi, but locals are still talking about his fiery speech in which he criticized President Bush's plan for social security and said Republicans are doing nothing to help the people of Mississippi.

"Every seat was filled. There were people standing around the room and people outside who couldn't get in," says Joanne Morris, an editor and writer living in Jackson. "He got an absolutely fantastic reception. I'm sure he must have been surprised. I was surprised myself. People were just jubilant."

Dean's speech revitalized scores of Mississippi Democrats who are sick of being ignored by the national party. "We're also written off in the media; they either skip over us or stereotype us," says Dorothy Triplett, secretary of the Mississippi Democratic Club, a group of progressive Mississippians. "We're finally saying, 'Hey, wait a minute, we're here and we're not going anywhere.' I think we can be a real asset to the national party and I'm delighted that they're finally giving us some attention."

As part of Dean's 50-state strategy, the Democratic National Committee is hiring staffers to join state party offices that typically run on shoestring budgets with few employees, including in Mississippi, North Carolina and Oklahoma.

"Because of his commitment, we'll be able to increase our staff by 300 percent, so to speak," says Keelan Sanders, executive director of the Mississippi Democratic Party. Before the new hires showed up, Sanders was the party's only staffer. "It is definitely helping the state party with needed resources so we can begin organizing and getting the message out."

Constructing that message won't be easy. It's been 28 years since Mississippi gave its six electoral votes to a Democrat; Bush got 60 percent of the vote in Mississippi. Democrats hold more county elected positions and legislative seats than Republicans, but the governor, lieutenant governor and the state's two senators are members of the GOP.

"Mississippi is ripe for the picking. They're either 49th or 50th in every statistical category. Per capita income is low. Poverty levels are high. Medicaid is a huge issue here," says Jay Parmley, former chair of Oklahoma's Democratic Party.

Parmley is spending a few months in Jackson helping the Mississippi Democratic Party. "What I'm finding here is that the message of our party, if delivered right, is what people want to hear. Can it be done quickly? No, but at least I can try to get people talking to each other again. So much of our party is that we all think we're important and we all have our own issues."

Parmley was one of the first state Democratic chairs to endorse Howard Dean. The announcement drew criticism from all sides of the political spectrum in Oklahoma, a state where John Kerry failed to win one county. "I started out thinking Dean was not what we needed. But the more I kept talking to him, the more I realized that this guy gets it. He understands that it's a 50-state strategy. He understands that those of us in Oklahoma and Mississippi aren't getting any help," says Parmley. "We need to build stronger state parties. He found out that most state parties only have one or two staffers, they're in dilapidated buildings and they're not raising any money. How are you supposed to communicate with people? Yahoo may be free, but you've got to build an infrastructure."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Rose Aguilar is a San Francisco-based journalist gathering stories from people living in states that voted overwhelmingly for George W. Bush. Track her journey at Stories in America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
we exist?
Posted by: johnharold on Aug 23, 2005 3:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did John Kerry campaign in Mississippi? Did Gore? In the new age of money politics, states with small populations like Mississippi get no attention during national elections.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: we exist? Posted by: Samantha Vimes
» RE: we exist? Posted by: spyderbaby
50 State Strategy Will Work
Posted by: rbohan on Aug 23, 2005 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree whole heartedly with the 50 state strategy. We can make gains in the South and West by repudiating GOP and Dem votes that hurt the middle class. We can make gains in the South and West by being clear that our positions are Bible-based and that the GOP is simply using God's word to gain power for themselves. We can make gains in the South and West by showing that economic issues are values and morals issues. We can make gains in the South and West by showing that we stand for something and that we're passionate about what we stand for.

The Sunday Morning Liberal

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mississippi will not fall
Posted by: flatulence on Aug 23, 2005 4:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in mississippi and I work in a casino. the economy is great(especially with Bushs tax cuts) and its no longer a poverty state. Its come a long way(thanks to quality republican leadership) In fact there really is no poverty in this country. The poorest people I know have a tv with a remote control and eat 3 or more meals per day. People in ms. like Bush just fine. However Im sure Dean will help keep republicans in charge. Ever time he or Michael Moore speak its always good for a chuckle. If you want to have a national party you may achieve it if you become patriotic and stop supporting terrorists. Good day

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mississippi will not fall Posted by: flatulence
» Oh I'm Imressed Posted by: errandchild
» RE: Oh I'm Imressed Posted by: flatulence2
» I'm even more impressed Posted by: errandchild
» mississippi cannot fall Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: mississippi cannot fall Posted by: flatulence2
» RE: mississippi cannot fall Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: mississippi will not fall Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: mississippi will not fall Posted by: flatulence2
» RE: mississippi will not fall Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: mississippi will not fall Posted by: spyderbaby
» RE: mississippi will not fall Posted by: flatulence6
FutureOutlook
Posted by: betterfuture on Aug 23, 2005 4:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Surely you are joking. Bush's economy and yours is not forward thinking. If we go into a recession -everyone will suffer. How many people do you know that are adequately covered with health insurance? How many have saved for retirement without having to rely on the stock market? (God forbid we would have our ss tied up in the stock market) Bush's tax cuts don't effect the group of people which surround you---they are not the top 1%----Do not kid yourself. So you think that everything will be ok if the Repubs institute a draft?? Much more is at stake than you realize. I dare you to become informed and think about what is at stake sticking with Bushie!-

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They must like loud people in Mississippi
Posted by: fenster on Aug 23, 2005 5:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they like the Screaming Dean.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» He resembles a Baptist preacher Posted by: errandchild
yellowdogdem
Posted by: DCH on Aug 23, 2005 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as we continue to run away from faith as a spiritual plus in our message of confronting the absence of substance in the politics of the right wing we will lose in the South.
Democratic politics mirror the equality under the law principle along with economic opportunity for all people. That is a spiritual principle defined in political context.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: yellowdogdem Posted by: Pepper
» RE: yellowdogdem Posted by: Roverton
North Mississippian
Posted by: fedupamerican on Aug 23, 2005 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so dumbfounded and irritated by "flatulence" that I must take leave of the computer and clear my head. The rhetoric is too much for me and my coffee. This is precisely what's wrong with the current state of our state. I feel sick....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: North Mississippian Posted by: roygib
» RE: North Mississippian Posted by: Pepper
» RE: North Mississippian Posted by: cyclone
» RE: North Mississippian Posted by: fedupamerican
» RE: North Mississippian Posted by: flatulence2
» RE: North Mississippian Posted by: cyclone
» RE: North Mississippian Posted by: spyderbaby
» RE: North Mississippian Posted by: flatulence6
Southern Bible Belt
Posted by: Sandra on Aug 23, 2005 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see how Bush and crew are doing on the Ten Commandments. No other god before me - I wonder what Southern Christians think about Bush putting unlimited greed and power before God? Thou shall not kill - I wonder what Southern Christians think about the killing of all the US soldiers and civilians in this war on Iraq, a war based on lies? Thou shall not steal - I wonder what Southern Christians think about Cheney's Haliburton and other private companies stealing from US citizens and the soldiers that they are supposed to provide for by grossly overcharging and providing poor quality to the soldiers, not to mention US corporations taking control of businesses and resources in Iraq? Thou shall not bear false witness. I wonder what Southern Christians thank about the fact that Bush and crew connected Sadam with the Saudi terrorists and 9/11 and that was proved false as a reason to go to war? Iraq is now of course a training ground for terrorists. Thou shall not covet thy neighbors house, etc. I wonder what Southern Chrisitians think about the fact that Bush coveted Iraq's possessions and decided to go to war and based his invasion on lies as proved by the Downing Street Memos and testimony of others who served this administration? I guess that some Southern Christians think that because Bush says he's a man of God, he must be. Perhaps they should take a look at what he does, not what he says. I took a look and I think that Bush does not understand Southern Christians or the bible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Southern Bible Belt Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Southern Bible Belt Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: So. Bible Belt- Daddy said.... Posted by: fedupamerican
» RE: Southern Bible Belt Posted by: Schnookums
Dr. Dean Campaigned for Increased Troop StrengthIn Occupied Iraq
Posted by: PECKERWOOD on Aug 23, 2005 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Howard Dean is no Robert Byrd--Dean has no conscience.And, we do not need a Jewish First Lady!As to comments about the so-called "War On Terror," this imbroglio in the Middle East is all about Israel, period! Get your head out of the sand!As to the comment about my Confederate ancestors, they fought against the same sort of Union invaders and occupiers as the Iraqi Freedom Fighters are doing now. General Nathan Bedford Forrest must be rolling in his grave knowing that members of the Mississippi National Guard carried-out the Deir Yassin-like, promiscuous slaughter of civilians at Fallujah;an artillery barrage on the defenseless civilians of that City of Minarets.The "new South" Mississippi National Guard is looking more like the Israeli Defense Forces.Mississippi's AG proudly said that Mississippi National Guardsmen were now experts in Urban warfare. And, too, General Forrest, like his contempories in Occupied Iraq, knew how to organize the civilian populace and rid the land of carpetbaggers and scalawags.BTW, Jack Abramoff,the self-described Scholar of Judaic Studies" scalped the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians of $ 60 million.One of his pet projects was funding Jewish Squatter sniper training camps in Gaza and the West Bank.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» gramps Posted by: gramps
A Democratic 50 strategy's a good start but...
Posted by: sausage on Aug 23, 2005 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever since Lyndon Johnson said that the Democratic Party lost the South with his signing of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the party acted accordingly, so maybe Dean's 50 states strategy's a good start .

But not if it is more of the Axis of Weasles (the Clintons, Biden, Vilsack) DLC "Third Way" crap that is what's passing for Democratic Party policy. Maybe Hillary's new found religion plays well with the hicks in the Southern sticks but her tax policies are nothing but the same old corporate welfare. Maybe Joe Biden's pledge of "winning" in Iraq by sending in more soldiers plays well in the small towns just outside military bases but its still a loser in the long run. Maybe Tom Vilsack's ersatz folksy charm wins a few votes up in Jackson but it's still big tax breaks and bribes for big business with a few crumbs for everybody else.

Democrats aren't going to win sh*t until the party is a people's party again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've never seen a DNC Chair go as far as MS
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 23, 2005 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know that MS will be in play for at least the next 4 years and possibly longer. However, I do think it shows that like most red states, people are sick and tired of living the "concentration camp" life but are unable to fight against it. Think "hypercognition". The rightwingers wouldn't be posting hate comments if they were so confident of their hold on the state. Since they're afraid of Howard Dean, I say too bad.

I remember in 2003 and 2004 the same rebels who were for Haley Barbour while blaming Musgrove for the mess despite Musgrove's Republican-lite stands pathetically backed Bush in 2004 despite the fact that most of the damage in MS came from Bush more than Musgrove. The race issue isn't really much of a factor as the parties and the media would have you believe or there wouldn't be Republican African American mayors in that state. If we're going to win MS, we're going to have to stop thinking of the elephant and stop thinking of the race. That's what helped Jimmy Carter win that state in 1976.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dean's ineffectiveness
Posted by: johnrice on Aug 23, 2005 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A measurement of Dean's ineffectiveness is the fact that this is mentioned as 'news' even though it happened six months ago. Isn't 'news' about something that happened seconds, minutes, hours or at the most, days ago? Or if the definiton is stretched to include that which wasn't reported before, why wasn't it, and isn't that, too a measure of his ineffectiveness?
If Dean were actually effective, there would be stories every day about actual news (ie.what happened recently) to invigorate or revive that which gives all appearances of morbidity--the Democratic Party.
As long as the people see that the Dems are nothing more than Republican Lite, it won't make any difference as to how we are governed as an empire-- both parties are co-enablers and advocates of our empire-building war criminality.
Unlike both branches of the Republocrats (AKA today's 'good Germans'), the Neither Party (www.neitherparty.org) does not support this war, nor our nation's participation in war criminality.
Our choice: either support our ongoing crimes against humanity or be against Bush and his cabal of war criminals--there is no moral middle ground or wiggle-room, and the whole world is watching.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dean's ineffectiveness Posted by: bluedog1
» RE: Dean's ineffectiveness Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Dean's ineffectiveness Posted by: bluedog1
» RE: Dean's ineffectiveness Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Dean's ineffectiveness Posted by: bluedog1
» RE: Dean's ineffectiveness Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Dean's ineffectiveness Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Dean's ineffectiveness Posted by: brasilaron
It's about more than issues
Posted by: nanobubble on Aug 23, 2005 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's about the vision for a safe, free society who participates in their community.

Maybe a candidate has a stance on a particular issue which is affecting a certain constituency, but what about when future issues develop? How will the candidates handle them?

They will address them as it fits the vision, whether it is abortion or stem cells, the overarching solution is to utilize technology to provide new jobs and new solutions; to assure safety and health are the priorities and that they are affordable (read: health insurance).

It's about having community roundtables and talking to neighbors to find the best solutions that help the people at an affordable and responsible manner.

And, as this article states, you need to stand up and say "I do not know all the answers, and whoever does is a liar...but I know how to find them" it's a matter of problem-solving and interaction - know the public you serve and work to implement and inform on the proposal for how to repair and make better.

Abstract the issues - what is left? It is the strategy for community problem solving and the unity of the party - and the resolve to make it happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thank you phil ochs for writing it, and flatulence for living it
Posted by: hobomike on Aug 23, 2005 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Dr. Dean!
Posted by: Meta4Life on Aug 23, 2005 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THIS is why I finally declared myself a Democrat and registered to vote accordingly. In two words: Howard Dean.

It's a 50 state strategy. And it will work if mealy-mouthed, spineless Democrats in DC and state capitols will get over themselves long enough to see that Dean's right. We're Democrats, dammit! And we can be proud of that for which we stand!

A Dean Democrat, Finally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Liberial dems WILL LOOSE MORE THEN MISSISSIPPI
Posted by: bluedog1 on Aug 23, 2005 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The elections in this country will not go the left wing liberial way ever again. The Clinton years have done that in. Most Americans will not and have not fallen for what the DNC has been pushing. Frankly it is mostly BS. Just look at the last elections, WE LOST by leaps and bounds. Be truthful with yourself and others or were done today, tomorrow and for years to come. We must stop the liberial wing that is colapsing this party, IE. M. Moore, MoveOn.org and Hollywood just to name a few.

Howard Dean has done nothing positive for this party. His tounge lashing and pointing the finger like a tattle tail 9 year old has cost millions in fund raising and will continue to cost more, much more.

Where have the TRUE Democrats gone? The democrats that truly care about the blue collar worker? The Democrats like my Mom and Dad, they were hard workers, not folks looking for a hand out. Where are the Democrats that really care about America,our future, our national security?

We do not need liberals dressed as democrats that worry more about some far left, politicaly corrrect, news papers opinion of them? We do not need liberals that wiggle the truth. In case you have forgot, The truth is the truth, not what some spin doctor in the DNC or local state party states it is.

Where has my party gone? I'll tell you if you can't figure it out..they are now Independants and REPUBLICANS!! They no longer beleive in the DNC. If you have not figured it out, I have real problems with the path of this partyalso.

Many Conservative "BLUEDOG" Democrats have switchced parties. Guess what! Many more are going to!! The Leftwing of this party is distroying what JFK, MLK and others like them did to advance this great country.

If the people who read this do not understand or can not comprehend this. Or some may say, he is just writing this to get a responce. You are more then likely part of the problem. You are part of what is riping this party to shreads.

Many of you so calldd democrats, you need to see the truth, you better take the wool off your eyes. The Howard Deans, Clinton's, Moores and their cronies are taking you down the creek with out a paddle or even a boat.

I wil not respond to any comments, I just hope you open your eyes before it is to late...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who are 'We'?
Posted by: robertjneal on Aug 23, 2005 3:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The green party is the only party genuinely calling for grassroots democracy. The democrats only want grassroots democracy until they get elected then they want to decide what is right or wrong. The government should be by the people not by a party.

I find it disappointing that people will forgive the democrats for voting to give Bush power to go to Iraq, voting for the energy bill that gives two-thirds of subsidies to oil, coal and nuclear energy companies and the democrats who do not mind using race, social class and democracy to get elected, but forgetting about it as soon as they land in Washington.

Okay, vote democrat just because they send a representative to your town. You'll get what's coming to you. Another corporate owned political party.

They lie, cheat, and steal and yet we tolerate them.

What percentage of democrats are supporting IRV?
What percentage of democrats are supporting ecological wisdom?
What percentage of democrats are supporting decentralization?

I think you'll find the answers rather disappointing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who are 'We'? Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Who are 'We'? Posted by: roygib
» RE: Who are 'We'? Posted by: cyclone
henryhawk
Posted by: henryhawk on Aug 25, 2005 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before anybody goes off half cocked about my handle let me explain - Henryhawk is the little Chicken Hawk in the Foghorn Leghorn cartoons.

Now to the matter at hand - Rose is absolutely right - we are chipping at the Republican party stroghold, not one state at a time, but in the case of Mississippi, one city at a time. This year we, the Democratic Party of Ocean Springs, worked hard and for the first time in anybody's memory we not only got a Democrat elected to an Alderman post, but we got a Democrat elected as Mayor. The big news is that they are both women. They took office on 1 July of this year and I can tell you for a fact that they have already turned this city around, even some hardline local Republicans had to admit that they are doing a helluva job

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Mississippi Will Not Go Blue
Posted by: blacksheep on Aug 30, 2005 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Associated Press today reported
that New Mexico's state supreme court is set to decide if New Mexico wrongly handled a recount request from two presidential candidates by requiring them to pay $1.4 million as a security deposit. This is not really a serious debate, requesting a depoisit of that size was just plain illegal.

Green Party presidential candidate David Cobb and Libertarian candidate Michael Badnarik asked for a recount of presidential ballots statewide in late November. Like democratic candidates in many states, including Ohio, they said there were problems with voting machines and counting of paper ballots.

President Bush "won" New Mexico in the general election by a 5,988-vote margin over Democrat Sen. John Kerry.

Cobb and Badnarik submitted a deposit of $114,400 and contend that was the proper amount for a recount based on a formula in state election law.

However, the state canvassing board decided that the candidates could have a recount only if they paid $1.4 million! As a result, there was no recount of presidential ballots.

Lawyers for Cobb and Badnarik said the canvassing board had exceeded its powers in demanding more than $1 million. The candidates filed a lawsuit and lost in district court, then appealed to the state Supreme Court.

State officials spuriously contend the legal challenge is obsolete because the 2004 election is over. This is liek saying that we can't conduct a muder investigation because the victim is already dead.


Cobb and Badnarik's lawyers rightly argue that Mexico's court must require the state canvassing board to follow the law and forbid it from making it up as it goes along.


The law was changed this year to add a provision which will make recounts even more difficult. According to the new rule, the canvassing board can require challengers to put up either a partial or full estimated fee for the recount "to ensure sufficeint security". What we need is security against this kind of bureaucratic secrecy and 'security' rhetoric, which itself is just pretext.

Change in law is unconstitutional and is evidence the Legislature intended to give the board powers it did not have in 2004.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]