Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

New Plan for Progressives

By John Nichols, The Nation. Posted August 17, 2005.


Taking the political fight to the states -- which are not yet entirely corrupted by money politics -- is the best way to change the country.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by John Nichols

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

One need not be a student of Tom DeLay's dirty dealings to recognize that the corruption of Washington is very nearly complete. Occupied by a president and vice president who are oilmen first and statesmen last, a Congress where Republicans and Democrats delay their votes until they have checked their campaign fund-raising receipts and a judiciary that is rapidly being packed with "bought" corporate lawyers such as Supreme Court nominee John Roberts, the nation's capital often seems completely beyond redemption.

It is not quite so true in the nation's 50 state capitals, however. Despite the ugliest efforts of corporate America -- via a lobbying frontgroup, the American Legislative Exchange Council -- to warp the process from Augusta (Maine) to Sacremento (California) as thoroughly as it has in Washington, there are still openings for progressive policymaking at the state level. Those openings are the target of the new Progressive Legislative Action Network (PLAN), a coalition developed to provide reform-minded legislators with strategic and research support as they seek to address the pressing economic and social issues that are left untended in a time of corporate hegemony.

"The goal is to bring as diverse a coalition together as possible so that our side has a cohesive agenda in the states," says David Sirota, the veteran progressive activist who has helped organize the network. "For too long, conservatives have been able to use huge sums of money to push the most radical right-wing policies through state legislatures. PLAN is committed to putting together the necessary resources and necessary coalitions to help progressive legislators stop this unchecked extremism, and start passing legislation that makes state governments work for ordinary citizens, not just monied special interests."

PLAN was set to formally launch Tuesday in Seattle, where the National Conference of State Legislatures gathers this week for its 2005 "Strong States, Strong Nation" annual meeting. The launch features appearances by former U.S. Sen. John Edwards, the 2004 Democratic nominee for vice president who has reemerged as an aggressive advocate for political and economic initiatives aimed addressing the gap between rich and poor in the United States, former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, who for many years was the most powerful player in the California state Assembly, and Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer, whose 2004 election proved that progressive Democratic reformers can win in so-called "red states." The launch is being co-sponsored by MoveOn.org, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the United Steelworkers union, and progressive philanthropists Andy and Deborah Rappaport -- support that provides an encouraging indication of the openness of powerful players on the left to the state-based work that will provide the models for renewal of the progressive movement nationally.

"Starting in the states" is not a new idea. In fact, most significant reform movements in American history have begun at the municipal or state level and built upward. At the dawn of the past century, the state-based progressive movements of the upper Midwest created what Justice Louis D. Brandeis referred to as "laboratories of democracy," where problems were addressed by creative legislators and governors in ways that federal officials eventually chose to mirror -- at first in the form of individual initiatives on issues such as child labor but ultimately with Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal.

Sirota, who has worked as an aide to U.S. Representatives Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, and David Obey, D-Wisconsin, and his PLAN co-chair, former Montana State Senate Minority Leader Steve Doherty, know that while there are important precedents for state-based work, there are also mighty challenges.


Digg!

John Nichols is The Nation's Washington correspondent.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"social and economic experiments"
Posted by: projectpeace on Aug 17, 2005 4:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"a single courageous state may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments."

That may have been true until last month, when the Supreme Court finally cut the throat of California's (and nine other states') novel social experiment, commonly known as medical 'marijuana.' In California, Prop 215 was approved by 80% of the voters, yet the Feds are still shilling for the chemical industry, creating a black market , while obviating a truly free market economy, and suppressing alternative energy solutions.

Data Rape of the peaceful Cannabis culture by the outlaw 'feral government' now includes raiding clinics, arresting doctors and grabbing people from other countries (i.e. Marc Emery, Canada) where Cannabis is respected as a valuable agricultural resource.

Until the States assert essential civilian demand for strategic resources currently under the thumb of the petrochemical multinational consortium that sells us expensive, toxic, unevenly distributed products, while draining the public trust with endless wars and oligarchic arrogance, nothing will change.

What's needed is to recognize that so-called environmental "externalities" are part of the economic equation that will shift human values back to respect for Nature. If that ever happens then the corrupt politiconomic influences in our government will lose their power as their poisonous petro-money comes to be recognized as worthless.

Everything that is being made from petroleum can be made better, cheaper and with less pollution from Cannabis. 'Marijuana' is a safe and effective phytotherapeutic herb that is also useful as an agricultural biocide, for protecting other food crops. Cannabis seed is the most nutritious seed on Earth, and the ONLY common seed with four essential fatty acids.

A free market agricultural economy is the only environmentally sustainable economy. The sooner we start using "every herb bearing seed" and stop calling the most useful plant in the world a "drug," the better chance future generations will have for inheriting a liveable planet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LG
Posted by: LG on Aug 17, 2005 4:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The closer the government is to the people the better. Insulated leadership is not good for our country. Sad to say politicians who spend most of their time kicking around K street are not representing the people. They tend to tell the people what to think more than be responsible to their constituents. I live in the initiative state (washington). We have had some good and bad initiatives started by run of the mill citizens. You can't depend on someone you never see to have your best interest, local is the best way to go. I can't control the president but I can control my local elected officials. It starts with one person, city, county, and state at a time because the big bad elephant is still afraid of a mouse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agitaot church and state
Posted by: eileen_flmng on Aug 17, 2005 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The time is right" for change and the "economic practices and [our] institutions must change" and the TIKKUN [Hebrew for heal, repair and transform the world] Community has already articulated a way, a plan and a New Bottom Line for America based on the core values of love, compassion, caring, ethical and ecological sensitivity and behavior that honors all human beings and all creation as embodiments of the sacred.

Democracies only flourish when citizens are actively involved. The time has come and the "fierce urgency of now"[MLK] should compell all of us to Do Something other than complain and instead boldly confront the hypocricy and immoral actions in our government and institutions.

"Never doubt that a few, thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world: Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."-Margaret Mead

Do Something:
www.tikkun.org

-e.
www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Make Congress More Representative
Posted by: shanaza on Aug 17, 2005 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given the historical assumption of power at the expense of the states, I cannot envision the federal government delegating any power back to the states (except for unfunded mandates). Maybe, in addition to pursuing interests at the state level, people should be rethinking the manner in which this government represents its people.
When a member of congress, on average, represents 650,000 people, whose interests is that member going to represent? Probably the interests with the largest wallet. Each congressman has (and is paying) a sizeable staff to analyze bills, gather information, plan events, monitor polls, and most important to them, raise money for re-election. It would be interesting to know how much this typical staff costs and multiply it by 438.
Two hundred years ago, each congressman represented approximately 30,000 people. Given the population growth, what constrains us to the current number of 435-438 representatives. If we had congressmen that represented even 100,000 people, I suspect they would, by necessity, be listening to the interests of their constituents; people would feel much closer to them & would probably have greater access. Large congressional staffs would be a luxury; campaign costs would drop; maybe they would focus more on committees, bills and the real work of congress with the interests of the American people in mind. Would total costs of governance increase so much? Or would eliminating even a fraction of the pork / waste pay for this many times over?
Progressives should be looking at this aspect of governance as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Montana Governer Brian Schweitzer is also working to purge lobbyists
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 17, 2005 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No Hope for Texas?
Posted by: JCS on Aug 17, 2005 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly, there are no true representatives of the people in Texas, except for Congressman Lloyd Doggett, at the national level. From the producers of dubya as gov, this state embodies everything that is despicable about Washington D.C.--a mini D.C. Kay Bailey Hutchinson? John Cornyn? Rick Perry? Home to Dick Cheney, Tom DeLay, etc., etc., etc. But, there are wonderful people here too that have become a part of the movement. AlterNet and MoveOn.org have helped us obtain some unity which is needed so badly in this state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DNC
Posted by: music_matters on Aug 17, 2005 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How odd that the author doesn't mention the DNC and Howard Dean's efforts to revitalize the Democratic Party at the grass roots. What the author describes and recommends is exactly what Dr. Dean is now doing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DNC Posted by: tkd82arty@netscape.net
The priority
Posted by: pjrsullivan on Aug 17, 2005 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Executive offices at the State level do offer one of the best possibilities to advance the cause of us all.

Our nuclear winter war criminals may make all of the politicking incidental.

We are all slated for nuclear destruction at the hands of the God Damnest bunch of fiends that the human race has ever had to endure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rod from Canada
Posted by: Rod from Canada on Aug 17, 2005 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given the extent of the current discontent with the Bush administration in particular, and the American federal government in general, I wonder if the time hasn't come for many in many states tp start considering secession from the union?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: od from Canada Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: od from Canada Posted by: errandchild
» RE: od from Canada Posted by: hermit
Mississippi is already half there
Posted by: errandchild on Aug 17, 2005 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our governor used to be a lobbyist. And while he takes the Nero approach to this state the citizens are taking notice; I don't think any who voted for him like him now. I really don't get my state sometimes because we hold this "vote democrat for local and state government, yet vote republican for national government" mentality to a whole new level of stupidity. The mayor and aldermen for my town are all democrats, and they are doing great things. The logic of not voting democrat for national government really has me slapping my forehead in disgust. We get this whole "democrats are good," mentality, we just don't use it on a national level.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rod from Canada
Posted by: Rod from Canada on Aug 17, 2005 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given the extent of the current discontent with the Bush administration in particular, and the American federal government in general, I wonder if the time hasn't come for many in many states to start considering secession from the union?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Example of a bit of tribal wisdom?
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 17, 2005 2:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When European Americans early on sat down with Native Americans to negotiate, it has been reported they noticed a practice that began to become a custom.

It turned out that the Native Americans chose a low-life, a tribal troublemaker, a delinquent to negotiate for them. The suposition is that by that time Native Americans had learned that they could not trust the intruders, who spoke with forked tongues. So they delegated such dealings to tribal members who were similarly untrustworthy.

Have we done the same with Bush after 9/11? And is that why the evidence of the abysmal disregard for intelligence already collected under Clinton goes ignored? Or how a man who began a tragic and failed war while lining the pockets of his supporters with government spending and tax cuts could get reelected?

Those who keep a rabid guard dog deserve to be bitten by it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Party
Posted by: robertjneal on Aug 17, 2005 3:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is amazing that people continue to trust their democrat or republican parties to do the right thing. Look at the voting records and you will wonder if you really should have voted for either party. We need a strong third party to shake up the others and while we are shaking them up let's do a party proper. While I think the greens are the obvious choice, there are libertarians and other parties as well.

Only we can take the government back. The coalition of the corporations and politicians are not going to get sick of being rich and powerful and simply hand it back. We do need to start with grassroots democracy and not with a party that doesn't legitimately support it. The democrats use grassroots democracy until they get elected and then abandon it. It needs to start local. We can't just register green and that will fix it all (although it helps alot because of the restricted ballot access put in place by the republican/democrat coalition). We need to be active if we want change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can we all agree on one thing?
Posted by: tkd82arty@netscape.net on Aug 17, 2005 8:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can we all agree that the Federal Goverment must once and for all return to upholding, and governing according to, the Constitution? Peace Tom

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]