Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Scandal is Bigger Than AIPAC

By Robert Dreyfuss, TomPaine.com. Posted August 12, 2005.


The indictment of four men charged with spying on the U.S. for Israel may eventually implicate the conservatives who thumped the drums for war in Iraq.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Robert Dreyfuss

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Important new details of the U.S.-Israeli espionage case involving Larry Franklin, the alleged Pentagon spy, two officials of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, and an intelligence official at the Embassy of Israel emerged last week. Two AIPAC officials -- who have left the organization -- were indicted along with Franklin on charges of "communicat[ing] national defense information to persons not entitled to receive it." In plain English, if not legal-speak, that means spying.

But as the full text of the indictment makes clear, the conspiracy involved not just Franklin and the AIPAC officials, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, but at least several other Pentagon officials who played intermediary roles, at least two other Israeli officials, and one official at a "Washington, D.C. think tank." It's an old-fashioned spy story involving the passing of secret documents, hush-hush meetings and outright espionage, along with good-old-boy networking.

But the network tied to the "Franklin case" which ought to be called the "AIPAC case," since it was AIPAC that was really under investigation by the FBI -- provides an important window into a shadowy world. It is clear that by probing the details of the case, the FBI has got hold of a dangerous loose end of much larger story. By pulling on that string hard enough, the FBI and the Justice Department might just unravel that larger story, which is beginning to look more and more like it involves the same nexus of Pentagon civilians, White House functionaries, and American Enterprise Institute officials who thumped the drums for war in Iraq in 2001-2003 and who are now trying to whip up an anti-Iranian frenzy as well.

Needless to say, all of this got short shrift from the mainstream media when it was revealed last week.

The basic facts of the case have been known for a while. Lawrence Anthony Franklin, a Department of Defense official, was caught red-handed giving highly classified papers to two officials, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, of AIPAC -- in part, concerning U.S. policy toward the Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq and the war on terrorism. But from the carefully worded indictment, it is clear that a lot more may have been going on. All in all, along with revealing tantalizing new information, the indictment raises more questions than it answers. To wit:

First, the indictment says that from "about April 1999 and continuing until on or about August 27, 2004" Franklin, Rosen and Weissman "did unlawfully, knowingly and willfully conspire" in criminal activity against the United States. So far, no one has explained what triggered an investigation that began more than six years ago. But it reveals how long the three indicted conspirators and "others, known and unknown to the Grand Jury," engaged in such criminal activity. In any case, what appeared at first to be a brief dalliance between Franklin and the two AIPAC officials now -- according to the latest indictment, at least -- spans more than five years and involves at least several other individuals, at least some of whom are known to the investigation. What triggered the investigation in 1999, and how much information has FBI surveillance, wiretaps and other investigative efforts collected?

Second, the indictment makes it absolutely clear that the investigation was aimed at AIPAC, not at Franklin. The document charges that Rosen and Weissman met repeatedly with officials from a foreign government (Israel, though not named in the indictment) beginning in 1999, to provide them with classified information. In other words, the FBI was looking into the Israel lobby, not Franklin and the Defense Department, at the start, and Franklin was simply caught up in the net when he made contact with the AIPACers. Rosen and Weissman were observed making illicit contact with several other U.S. officials between 1999 and 2004, although those officials are left unnamed (and unindicted). Might there be more to come? Who are these officials, cited merely as United States Government Official 1, USGO 2, etc.?


Digg!

Robert Dreyfuss is a freelance writer based in Alexandria, Va., who specializes in politics and national security issues.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Loose thread
Posted by: Brandoc-D'Ha on Aug 12, 2005 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been following this story on the internet(the only place you'll find it in detail).It reads like a Tom Clancy novel and is chilling in its scope.It involves AIPAC,AEI,PNAC and events that have been briefly mentioned by MSM and on the surface appear to have no connection such as : The firing of 4star General Byrnes,the truck laden with 35,000 lbs of explosives that exploded in Utah, the air force officer who was arrested for vandalizing automobiles with bush bumper stickers,A shot down helicopter,CNN's set up in a military facility,Cheney making plans to nuke Iran,plans to invoke Martial Law,military leave being cancelled after Sept 7 and much more.I know this sounds insane but as I look out on the world I do not see that Sanity rules.If nothing else this all would make a great book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agitator church and state
Posted by: eileen_flmng on Aug 12, 2005 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Mr. Dreyfuss for addressing the elephant in the room; mainstream media's avoidance of reporting the truth when it comes to the Israeli government.
All of us cetrtainly have had good friends that sometimes act like jerks. If America and Israel are best friends are we not compelled by the truth to tell our friend we will not tolerate any more unjust and undemocratic action?
American tax payers provide 2.9 billion dollars every year to Israel- 2 billion goes directly to their military.
Millions of Palestinians have been denied basic human rights because of the condemnable actions of a minority of violent perpetrators.
The occupation, oppression, and The Wall which continues to grab Palestinian water and land, are unjust and immoral.
This June I spent 16 days in Israel Palestine, as a witness and reporter. My experiences there can be read @
www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Don't Let the Sun Go Down on Me"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Aug 12, 2005 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You use the general term "reporters," and "courageous" in the same sentence? Oh, tsk, tsk. That's an oxymoron (as opposed to Bush, a moron ox...) And don't expect the mainstream media to care: they will not bite the **** that feeds them, or stand up to the hands that slap them around.

The truth is, much of American politics has lived in the long shadows of twilight almost since this nation was born. What's different about today, however, is that for the first time, we may finally be seeing the sun setting and a pitch black darkness falling over our land.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

4 Words
Posted by: nakis on Aug 12, 2005 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cover up, media blackout.

Lets have a show of hands. How many people think that our government and the military/industrial complex is so corrupt that most of them are just a bunch of walking shells?

This too shall pass. The guilty will be whitewashed, evidence will disappear, favors repayed and new debts created. And in the morning they will wake up and do it again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 4 Words Posted by: Tubeguru
Perhaps some more insight
Posted by: LoisC on Aug 12, 2005 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps these articles will provide a little more related insight as to what this is all about:

Israel's Blitzkrieg on Middle East Oil "Operation Shekhinah"
http://www.joevialls.co.uk/subliminalsuggestion/oil.html

"Operation Shekhinah a.k.a. Operation Iraqi Freedom"
http://www.vialls.com/subliminalsuggestion/oil2.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agitator church and state
Posted by: eileen_flmng on Aug 12, 2005 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good news; the mainstream media blackout is over thanks to Internet.
Check out Mordechai Vanunu's message to USA christian zionists : www.wearewideawake.org

Due to the media blackout you may not have learned Vanunu was tried for treason by the Israeli government in a closed door trial in 1986, for telling the world The Truth: Israel had gone nuclear.
Israel has yet to receive a UN weapons inspection.

America can find WMD in the Middle East today: go to the 40 year old Dimona nuclear plant in the Negev.
American can also find millions of instances of the denial of basic human rights: the life of every Palestinian in Israel Palestine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: agitator church and state Posted by: timg98376
agents of a foreign government?
Posted by: timg98376 on Aug 12, 2005 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this was any country other than Israel there would be a clamor for Feith, Perle and their ilk to register as agents of a foreign government. This issue of dual loyalties has serious national security implications.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

transatlantyk
Posted by: transatlantyk on Aug 12, 2005 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If scratching your head why we are in this Iraqi/terrorism mess, consider that majority of informed people around the world have little doubt about the reason: Israeli partisans control American foreign policy and mass media. Power of this lobby shuts down any debate about the real (and stated by terrorists) cause of 9/11, which is occupation of the West Bank. This in turn was grabbed by the lobby as an opportunity to destroy the most dangerous enemy of Israel - Saddam's Iraq. J. Miller was just one of countless activists working on the project. It is not a coincidence that the most active and vicious Iraq - bashers were Jewish: from Wolfowitz, Feith and Perle to Adelman, Brooks and Kristol, to name just a few. This fifth column must be exposed to prevent further damage to our treasure and life. Manipulation of intelligence and public opinion that went into this enterprise is nothing short of treason of historical proportions. Sure there were others involved: primarily imperium-buildrs/oil securing corporate types and political opportunists like our puppet head. But if somebody wonders how could have seemingly civilized Germans attempt a Final Solution - just look how anti-Semitism is born in front of our eyes. To paraphrase somebody: never in the history of the mankind, so many across the world did not suffer so much for so few (lunatic settlers) to gain so little (land and water of the West Bank). Sure, there will be still plenty to deal with, but you cannot make any progress without decisively addressing that glaring injustice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: transatlantyk Posted by: starchild
Pack Hunting Animals
Posted by: pjrsullivan on Aug 12, 2005 5:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Humans are predators and also cannibals, it is part of our nature. The desert dwellers, because of the stress induced by the scarcity of the desert, have a highly tuned cannibal pack hunting behavior.

To hunt any animal it is necessary to deceive the prey so that it may be lured in to be eaten. Humans having a large thinking potential require also a large amount of deception to use them for food.

The desert favors genocidal behavior so as to reduce the pressure on the limited resources of the Desert. Though the Zionist pack hunting cannibals live mostly outside of the Desert these days, the behaviors learned from the Desert and passed on through the cult, are still useful to deal with more pacific sorts of people.

The term used to describe this behavior is called, "Individual biological opportunity." This explains why when the population awakens to the predator game that is played upon them, the tribe caught playing the game gets the ax. As only a small number play the game, the majority of the tribe gets lumped, this somewhat explains the statement that Jews make about one another, that its always another Jew that does them in. It is in the biological strategy to reduce feeders in the same biological niche. This helps explain why the Nazis were aided by the wealthier Jews. "They would not allow a sentimental notion to interfere with making a buck."

The majority of Jews want to be rid of the old cannibal ways, yet the Zionists are having too much fun and making too much money to quit now. The "Alliance," that is the Zionists who have allied themselves with the worldwide criminal elite work hand in hand to effectively prey on their fellow humans.

When the genocidal cannibal elite decided to destroy us with nuclear weapons in 1947, that was the beginning of the Extraterrestrial intervention into this world; to give us time to get treatment for our "Primitive Bretheren," still captives of their genocidal cannibal past.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wakeup call to progressive lefties
Posted by: codingguy on Aug 12, 2005 8:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at the lunatic, conspiratorial and --of course-- racist direction this thread has taken, and hopefully you can see the danger of singling out one state (and by extension, one people) for non-stop, one sided criticism, especially when the people in question who currently populate this state had to endure the worst ethnic cleansing the world has ever known just 60 years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» re: huh? Posted by: codingguy
» RE: re: huh? Posted by: Brandoc-D'Ha
» RE: re: huh? Posted by: codingguy
» RE: re: huh? Posted by: Pooty T
Don't you belong at storm front
Posted by: dameocrat on Aug 13, 2005 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The settlers are nasty, but the nazis were worse. The settlers are largely a responce to nazis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This is to transatlantyk Posted by: dameocrat
There is a place called storm front for these kinds of posts
Posted by: dameocrat on Aug 13, 2005 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope everyone reports these idiot ravings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That was to Badlawdog
Posted by: dameocrat on Aug 13, 2005 1:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cold hollocaust
Posted by: TruthSeeker on Aug 13, 2005 1:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The palestinians have been paying for the hollocaust for 50 years. You can call their suffering a 'cold hollocaust'. There are 6 million palestinian refugees living in refugee camps such as Subra and Shatila in lebanon where sharon 'The Godfather of terrorism' killed 3000 civilains, a lot of palestinian refugees still hold the deeds for their homes in Haifa, Jafa after israeli terrorist groups kicked them out. This EXTREME INJUSTICE drove the hopless palestinians to terrorism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ice cold holocaust Posted by: codingguy
ice cold
Posted by: codingguy on Aug 14, 2005 10:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yes i agree the palestinians have been paying for the holocaust and european anti-semitism in general for most of the past century. unfortunately, this injustice can only be cured, it would seem, by the State of Israel simply disappearing, and that ain't likely to happen, so an accommodation is needed, which is what most reasonable people believe.
your cutesy "cold holocaust" reference is what i'm replying to, however. you can call the palestinian situation a tragedy, or as they call it, a catastrophe, legitimately enough. But a holocaust? Gimme a break. There were maybe 1 million palestinians in 1948. Now there are more than 1 million living in Israel itself, another 2 million in the West Bank and Gaza, and millions in lebanon, syria, and the rest of the Arab world. You dishonor the victims of real holocausts/genocides -- tutsis in Rwanda, Armenians, Cambodians -- when you use those words in connection with the Israel/Palestine conflicts.
I'm sure any of the victims i just mentioned -- not to mention the Jews of Europe -- would have jumped at the chance to endure a so-called "cold holocaust" of Palestinian proportions. What's happened to the Palestinians is certainly deplorable, but it ain't no holocaust, cold or otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did I miss something in this story?
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 15, 2005 9:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it the threads based on any story involving Israel quickly ignore the subject of the story in order to bring up either the holocaust or the Palestinians? As if either of those can explain everything going on.

Spies endanger the US, right? Israel's unique history does not justify illegal acts against the US. And the plight of the Palestinians shouldn't make any difference in catching and prosecuting spies. Playing the 'holocaust' card vs. the 'poor Palestinians' card has nothing to do with this spy case, as far as I can see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]