Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Hiroshima Cover-up Exposed

By Greg Mitchell, Editor & Publisher. Posted August 4, 2005.


60-year-old footage from Hiroshima and Nagasaki -- suppressed and nearly destroyed by the U.S. -- will finally be shown in America.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Greg Mitchell

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In the weeks following the atomic attacks on Japan almost 60 years ago, and then for decades afterward, the United States engaged in airtight suppression of all film shot in Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the bombings. This included footage shot by U.S. military crews and Japanese newsreel teams. In addition, for many years all but a handful of newspaper photographs were seized or prohibited.

The public did not see any of the newsreel footage for 25 years, and the U.S. military film remained hidden for nearly four decades.

The full story of this atomic cover-up is told fully for the first time at Editor & Publisher, as the 60th anniversary of the atomic bombings approaches later this week. Some of the long-suppressed footage will be aired on television this Saturday.

Six weeks ago, E&P broke the story that articles written by famed Chicago Daily News war correspondent George Weller about the effects of the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki were finally published, in Japan, almost six decades after they had been spiked by U.S. officials. This drew national attention, but suppressing film footage shot in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was even more significant, as this country rushed into the nuclear age with its citizens having neither a true understanding of the effects of the bomb on human beings, nor why the atomic attacks drew condemnation around the world.

As editor of Nuclear Times magazine in the 1980s, I met Herbert Sussan, one of the members of the U.S. military film crew, and Erik Barnouw, the famed documentarian who first showed some of the Japanese footage on American TV in 1970. In fact, that newsreel footage might have disappeared forever if the Japanese filmmakers had not hidden one print from the Americans in a ceiling.
The color U.S. military footage would remain hidden until the early 1980s, and has never been fully aired. It rests today at the National Archives in College Park, Md., in the form of 90,000 feet of raw footage labeled #342 USAF.

When that footage finally emerged, I corresponded and spoke with the man at the center of this drama: Lt. Col. (Ret.) Daniel A. McGovern, who directed the U.S. military filmmakers in 1945-1946, managed the Japanese footage, and then kept watch on all of the top-secret material for decades.

"I always had the sense," McGovern told me, "that people in the Atomic Energy Commission were sorry we had dropped the bomb. The Air Force -- it was also sorry. I was told by people in the Pentagon that they didn't want those [film] images out because they showed effects on man, woman and child. ... They didn't want the general public to know what their weapons had done -- at a time they were planning on more bomb tests. We didn't want the material out because ... we were sorry for our sins."

Sussan, meanwhile, struggled for years to get some of the American footage aired on national TV, taking his request as high as President Truman, Robert F. Kennedy and Edward R. Murrow, to no avail.

More recently, McGovern declared that Americans should have seen the damage wrought by the bomb. "The main reason it was classified was ... because of the horror, the devastation," he said. Because the footage shot in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was hidden for so long, the atomic bombings quickly sank, unconfronted and unresolved, into the deeper recesses of American awareness, as a costly nuclear arms race, and nuclear proliferation, accelerated.

The atomic cover-up also reveals what can happen in any country that carries out deadly attacks on civilians in any war and then keeps images of what occurred from its own people.

Ten years ago, I co-authored (with Robert Jay Lifton) the book "Hiroshima in America," and new material has emerged since. On Aug. 6, and on following days, the Sundance cable channel will air "Original Child Bomb," a prize-winning documentary on which I worked. The film includes some of the once-censored footage -- along with home movies filmed by McGovern in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The Japanese newsreel footage

On Aug. 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb over Hiroshima, killing at least 70,000 instantly and perhaps 50,000 more in the days and months to follow. Three days later, it exploded another atomic bomb over Nagasaki, slightly off target, killing 40,000 immediately and dooming tens of thousands of others. Within days, Japan had surrendered, and the U.S. readied plans for occupying the defeated country -- and documenting the first atomic catastrophe.

But the Japanese also wanted to study it. Within days of the second atomic attack, officials at the Tokyo-based newsreel company Nippon Eigasha discussed shooting film in the two stricken cities. In early September, just after the Japanese surrender, and as the American occupation began, director Sueo Ito set off for Nagasaki. There his crew filmed the utter destruction near ground zero and scenes in hospitals of the badly burned and those suffering from the lingering effects of radiation.

On Sept. 15, another crew headed for Hiroshima. When the first rushes came back to Toyko, Akira Iwasaki, the chief producer, felt "every frame burned into my brain," he later said.

At this point, the American public knew little about conditions in the atomic cities beyond Japanese assertions that a mysterious affliction was attacking many of those who survived the initial blasts (claims that were largely taken to be propaganda). Newspaper photographs of victims were non-existent, or censored. Life magazine would later observe that for years "the world ... knew only the physical facts of atomic destruction."

Tens of thousands of American GIs occupied the two cities. Because of the alleged absence of residual radiation, no one was urged to take precautions.

Then, on Oct. 24, 1945, a Japanese cameraman in Nagasaki was ordered to stop shooting by an American military policeman. His film, and then the rest of the 26,000 feet of Nippon Eisasha footage, was confiscated by the U.S. General Headquarters (GHQ). An order soon arrived banning all further filming. It was at this point that Lt. Daniel McGovern took charge.

Shooting the U.S. Military footage

In early September, 1945, less than a month after the two bombs fell, Lt. McGovern -- who as a member of Hollywood's famed First Motion Picture Unit shot some of the footage for William Wyler's "Memphis Belle" -- had become one of the first Americans to arrive in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He was a director with the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey, organized by the Army the previous November to study the effects of the air campaign against Germany, and now Japan.

As he made plans to shoot the official American record, McGovern learned about the seizure of the Japanese footage. He felt it would be a waste to not take advantage of the newsreel footage, noting in a letter to his superiors that "the conditions under which it was taken will not be duplicated, until another atomic bomb is released under combat conditions."

McGovern proposed hiring some of the Japanese crew to edit and "caption" the material, so it would have "scientific value." He took charge of this effort in early January 1946, even as the Japanese feared that, when they were done, they would never see even a scrap of their film again.

At the same time, McGovern was ordered by General Douglas MacArthur on January 1, 1946 to document the results of the U.S. air campaign in more than 20 Japanese cities. His crew would shoot exclusively on color film, Kodachrome and Technicolor, rarely used at the time even in Hollywood. McGovern assembled a crew of eleven, including two civilians. Third in command was a young lieutenant from New York named Herbert Sussan.

The unit left Tokyo in a specially outfitted train, and made it to Nagasaki. "Nothing and no one had prepared me for the devastation I met there," Sussan later told me. "We were the only people with adequate ability and equipment to make a record of this holocaust. ... I felt that if we did not capture this horror on film, no one would ever really understand the dimensions of what had happened. At that time people back home had not seen anything but black and white pictures of blasted buildings or a mushroom cloud."

Along with the rest of McGovern's crew, Sussan documented the physical effects of the bomb, including the ghostly shadows of vaporized civilians burned into walls; and, most chillingly, dozens of people in hospitals who had survived (at least momentarily) and were asked to display their burns, scars, and other lingering effects for the camera as a warning to the world.

At the Red Cross Hospital in Hiroshima, a Japanese physician traced the hideous, bright red scars that covered several of the patients -- and then took off his white doctor's shirt and displayed his own burns and cuts.

After sticking a camera on a rail car and building their own tracks through the ruins, the Americans filmed hair-raising tracking shots that could have been lifted right from a Hollywood movie. Their chief cameramen was a Japanese man, Harry Mimura, who in 1943 had shot "Sanshiro Sugata," the first feature film by a then-unknown Japanese director named Akira Kurosawa.

The suppression begins

While all this was going on, the Japanese newsreel team was completing its work of editing and labeling all their black & white footage into a rough cut of just under three hours. At this point, several members of Japanese team took the courageous step of ordering from the lab a duplicate of the footage they had shot before the Americans took over the project.

Director Ito later said: "The four of us agreed to be ready for 10 years of hard labor in the case of being discovered." One incomplete, silent print would reside in a ceiling until the Occupation ended.

The negative of the finished Japanese film, nearly 15,000 feet of footage on 19 reels, was sent off to the U.S. in early May 1946. The Japanese were also ordered to include in this shipment all photographs and related material. The footage would be labeled SECRET and not emerge from the shadows for more than 20 years.

The following month, McGovern was abruptly ordered to return to the U.S. He hauled the 90,000 feet of color footage, on dozens of reels in huge footlockers, to the Pentagon and turned it over to General Orvil Anderson. Locked up and declared top secret, it did not see the light of day for more than 30 years.

McGovern would be charged with watching over it. Sussan would become obsessed with finding it and getting it aired.

Fearful that his film might get "buried," McGovern stayed on at the Pentagon as an aide to Gen. Anderson, who was fascinated by the footage and had no qualms about showing it to the American people. "He was that kind of man, he didn't give a damn what people thought," McGovern told me. "He just wanted the story told."

In an article in his hometown Buffalo Evening News, McGovern said that he hoped that "this epic will be made available to the American public." He planned to call the edited movie "Japan in Defeat."

Once they eyeballed the footage, however, most of the top brass didn't want it widely shown and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) was also opposed, according to McGovern. It nixed a Warner Brothers feature film project based on the footage that Anderson had negotiated, while paying another studio about $80,000 to help make four training films.

In a March 3, 1947 memo, Francis E. Rundell, a major in the Air Corps, explained that the film would be classified "secret." This was determined "after study of subject material, especially concerning footage taken at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is believed that the information contained in the films should be safeguarded until cleared by the Atomic Energy Commission." After the training films were completed, the status would be raised to "Top Secret" pending final classification by the AEC.

The color footage was shipped to the Wright-Patterson base in Ohio. McGovern went along after being told to put an I.D. number on the film "and not let anyone touch it -- and that's the way it stayed," as he put it. After cataloging it, he placed it in a vault in the top-secret area.

"Dan McGovern stayed with the film all the time," Sussan later said. "He told me they could not release the film [because] what it showed was too horrible."

Sussan wrote a letter to President Truman, suggesting that a film based on the footage "would vividly and clearly reveal the implications and effects of the weapons that confront us at this serious moment in our history." A reply from a Truman aide threw cold water on that idea, saying such a film would lack "wide public appeal."

McGovern, meanwhile, continued to "babysit" the film, now at Norton Air Force base in California. "It was never out of my control," he said later, but he couldn't make a film out of it any more than Sussan could (but unlike Herb, he at least knew where it was).

The Japanese footage emerges

At the same time, McGovern was looking after the Japanese footage. Fearful that it might get lost forever in the military/government bureaucracy, he secretly made a 16 mm print and deposited it in the U.S. Air Force Central Film Depository at Wright-Patterson. There it remained out of sight, and generally out of mind. (The original negative and production materials remain missing, according to Abe Mark Nornes, who teaches at the University of Michigan and has researched the Japanese footage more than anyone.)

The Japanese government repeatedly asked the U.S. for the full footage of what was known in that country as "the film of illusion," to no avail. A rare article about what it called this "sensitive" dispute appeared in The New York Times on May 18, 1967, declaring right in its headline that the film had been "Suppressed by U.S. for 22 Years." Surprisingly, it revealed that while some of the footage was already in Japan (likely a reference to the film hidden in the ceiling), the U.S. had put a "hold" on the Japanese using it -- even though the American control of that country had ceased many years earlier.

Despite rising nuclear fears in the 1960s, before and after the Cuban Missile Crisis, few in the U.S. challenged the consensus view that dropping the bomb on two Japanese cities was necessary. The United States maintained its "first-use" nuclear policy: Under certain circumstances it would strike first with the bomb and ask questions later. In other words, there was no real taboo against using the bomb. This notion of acceptability had started with Hiroshima. A firm line against using nuclear weapons had been drawn--in the sand. The U.S., in fact, had threatened to use nuclear weapons during the Cuban Missile Crisis and on other occasions.

On Sept. 12, 1967, the Air Force transferred the Japanese footage to the National Archives Audio Visual Branch in Washington, with the film "not to be released without approval of DOD (Department of Defense)."

Then, one morning in the summer of 1968, Erik Barnouw, author of landmark histories of film and broadcasting, opened his mail to discover a clipping from a Tokyo newspaper sent by a friend. It indicated that the United States had finally shipped to Japan a copy of black & white newsreel footage shot in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Japanese had negotiated with the State Department for its return.

From the Pentagon, Barnouw learned in 1968 that the original nitrate film had been quietly turned over to the National Archives, so he went to take a look. Soon Barnouw realized that, despite its marginal film quality, "enough of the footage was unforgettable in its implications, and historic in its importance, to warrant duplicating all of it," he later wrote.

Attempting to create a subtle, quiet, even poetic, black and white film, he and his associates cut it from 160 to 16 minutes, with a montage of human effects clustered near the end for impact. Barnouw arranged a screening at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, and invited the press. A throng turned out and sat in respectful silence at its finish. (One can only imagine what impact the color footage with many more human effects would have had.) "Hiroshima-Nagasaki 1945" proved to be a sketchy but quite moving document of the aftermath of the bombing, captured in grainy but often startling black and white images: shadows of objects or people burned into walls, ruins of schools, miles of razed landscape viewed from the roof of a building.

In the weeks ahead, however, none of the (then) three TV networks expressed interest in airing it. "Only NBC thought it might use the film," Barnouw later wrote, "if it could find a 'news hook.' We dared not speculate what kind of event this might call for." But then an article appeared in Parade magazine, and an editorial in the Boston Globe blasted the networks, saying that everyone in the country should see this film: "Television has brought the sight of war into America's sitting rooms from Vietnam. Surely it can find 16 minutes of prime time to show Americans what the first A-bombs, puny by today's weapons, did to people and property 25 years ago."

This at last pushed public television into the void. What was then called National Educational Television (NET) agreed to show the documentary on August 3, 1970, to coincide with the 25th anniversary of dropping the bomb.

"I feel that classifying all of this filmed material was a misuse of the secrecy system since none of it had any military or national security aspect at all," Barnouw told me. "The reason must have been--that if the public had seen it and Congressmen had seen it--it would have been much harder to appropriate money for more bombs."

The American footage comes out

About a decade later, by pure chance, Herb Sussan would spark the emergence of the American footage, ending its decades in the dark.

In the mid-1970s, Japanese antinuclear activists, led by a Tokyo teacher named Tsutomu Iwakura, discovered that few pictures of the aftermath of the atomic bombings existed in their country. Many had been seized by the U.S. military after the war, they learned, and taken out of Japan. The Japanese had as little visual exposure to the true effects of the bomb as most Americans. Activists managed to track down hundreds of pictures in archives and private collections and published them in a popular book. In 1979 they mounted an exhibit at the United Nations in New York.

There, by chance, Iwakura met Sussan, who told him about the U.S. military footage.

Iwakura made a few calls and found that the color footage, recently declassified, might be at the National Archives. A trip to Washington, D.C. verified this. He found eighty reels of film, labeled #342 USAF, with the reels numbered 11000 to 11079. About one-fifth of the footage covered the atomic cities. According to a shot list, reel #11010 included, for example: "School, deaf and dumb, blast effect, damaged ... Commercial school demolished ... School, engineering, demolished. ... School, Shirayama elementary, demolished, blast effect ... Tenements, demolished."

The film had been quietly declassified a few years earlier, but no one in the outside world knew it. An archivist there told me at the time, "If no one knows about the film to ask forit, it's as closed as when it was classified."

Eventually 200,000 Japanese citizens contributed half a million dollars and Iwakura was able to buy the film. He then traveled around Japan filming survivors who had posed for Sussan and McGovern in 1946. Iwakura quickly completed a documentary called "Prophecy" and in late spring 1982 arranged for a New York premiere.

That fall a small part of the McGovern/Sussan footage turned up for the first time in an American film, one of the sensations of the New York Film Festival, called "Dark Circle." It's co-director, Chris Beaver, told me, "No wonder the government didn't want us to see it. I think they didn't want Americans to see themselves in that picture. It's one thing to know about that and another thing to see it."

Despite this exposure, not a single story had yet appeared in an American newspaper about the shooting of the footage, its suppression or release. And Sussan was now ill with a form of lymphoma doctors had found in soldiers exposed to radiation in atomic tests during the 1950s -- or in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

In late 1982, editing Nuclear Times, I met Sussan and Erik Barnouw -- and talked on several occasions with Daniel McGovern, out in Northridge, California. "It would make a fine documentary even today," McGovern said of the color footage. "Wouldn't it be wonderful to have a movie of the burning of Atlanta?"

After he hauled the footage back to the Pentagon, McGovern said, he was told that under no circumstances would the footage be released for outside use. "They were fearful of it being circulated," McGovern said. He confirmed that the color footage, like the black and white, had been declassified over time, taking it from top secret to "for public release" (but only if the public knew about it and asked for it).

Still, the question of precisely why the footage remained secret for so long lingered. Here McGovern added his considerable voice. "The main reason it was classified was...because of the horror, the devastation," he said. "The medical effects were pretty gory. ... The attitude was: do not show any medical effects. Don't make people sick."

But who was behind this? "I always had the sense," McGovern answered, "that people in the AEC were sorry they had dropped the bomb. The Air Force--it was also sorry. I was told by people in the Pentagon that they didn't want those images out because they showed effects on man, woman and child. But the AEC, they were the ones that stopped it from coming out. They had power of God over everybody," he declared. "If it had anything to do with nukes, they had to see it. They were the ones who destroyed a lot of film and pictures of the first U.S. nuclear tests after the war."

Even so, McGovern believed, his footage might have surfaced "if someone had grabbed the ball and run with it but the AEC did not want it released."

As "Dark Circle" director Chris Beaver had said, "With the government trying to sell the public on a new civil defense program and Reagan arguing that a nuclear war is survivable, this footage could be awfully bad publicity."

Today

In the summer of 1984, I made my own pilgrimage to the atomic cities, to walk in the footsteps of Dan McGovern and Herb Sussan, and meet some of the people they filmed in 1946. By then, the McGovern/ Sussan footage had turned up in several new documentaries. On Sept. 2, 1985, however, Herb Sussan passed away. His final request to his children: Would they scatter his ashes at ground zero in Hiroshima?

In the mid-1990s, researching "Hiroshima in America," a book I would write with Robert Jay Lifton, I discovered the deeper context for suppression of the U.S. Army film: it was part of a broad effort to suppress a wide range of material related to the atomic bombings, including photographs, newspaper reports on radiation effects, information about the decision to drop the bomb, even a Hollywood movie.

The 50th anniversary of the bombing drew extensive print and television coverage -- and wide use of excerpts from the McGovern/Sussan footage--but no strong shift in American attitudes on the use of the bomb.

Then, in 2003, as adviser to a documentary film, "Original Child Bomb," I urged director Carey Schonegevel to draw on the atomic footage as much as possible. She not only did so but also obtained from McGovern's son copies of home movies he had shot in Japan while shooting the official film.

"Original Child Bomb" went on to debut at the 2004 Tribeca Film Festival, win a major documentary award, and this week, on Aug. 6 and 7, it will debut on the Sundance cable channel. After 60 years at least a small portion of that footage will finally reach part of the American public in the unflinching and powerful form its creators intended. Only then will the Americans who see it be able to fully judge for themselves what McGovern and Sussan were trying to accomplish in shooting the film, why the authorities felt they had to suppress it, and what impact their footage, if widely aired, might have had on the nuclear arms race -- and the nuclear proliferation that plagues, and endangers, us today.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We are all Dr. Strangelove
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 4, 2005 6:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congratulations on telling a very complicated story in a very brief and concise fashion. Thank you.

I was still a tv addict in the 70s and 80s, especially PBS. I have a vague recollection of seeing there one of the films referred to. While I would be the last to approve of a suppression of information by the Pentagon, this just does not rate a breathless suggestion of high crimes and misdemeanors. For instance, is anyone asking why the footage of the destruction of Dresden and Berlin, in Europe, is rarely presented? I should have preferred a much clearer exposition of the timing of events, which I had to read over several times before I could begin to keep them straight.

McGovern’s comment about the burning of Atlanta seems a bit oblique. Did he never see “Gone With the Wind”? In fact, Hollywood has given us, as best I can recall, its versions of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as well.

I once attended a public showing of military footage of captured German concentration camp films, where bulldozers were used in the disposal of the bodies. I was not surprised that such a film had not been given wide release.

Since the suppression of the footage from Japan was noted publicly by the NY Times in 1965 and the art film version shown to a select audience in 1968, later to be shown on PBS, and still little notice was taken, leads me to believe that it is only danger to the US that is of interest, not danger from the US.

Your story recalls to my mind that my very first act of public protest was to join a march in commemoration of the 10th anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima. We were ridiculed and spat on as we walked from the southside of Chicago to the Loop. There have been many demonstrations for me against nuclear weapons since. But even I have become inured to the realization that thermonuclear missiles are still pointed at where I live from several directions, and they can arrive on target within 20 minutes of release. It's only one facet of the madness I have grown accustomed to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We are all Dr. Strangelove Posted by: PECKERWOOD
» RE: We are all Dr. Strangelove Posted by: PECKERWOOD
tell the people the truth
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 5, 2005 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
60 years eh? It took almost that long for the truth about US planning the raid on Pearl Harbor and giving it to the Japanese. Now it's the truth about the bombs aftermath. All of
this speaks to one thing. The Government can't be trusted.
FDR sold out the country to the industrialists to get us out of the depression by getting into the war. Kennedy cut the tax rate for the rich by 30% and we used Vietnam and it's people.
We tried to destableize Central America. Along with the
Middle East. Are we going to wait another 60 years before we find out Bush and his cronies set up the whole 9/11 scam?
I hope not,we don't have the childern to feed to them,and
we're not putting up with it for much longer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: tell the people the truth Posted by: nickptar
» LMAO! [no message] Posted by: nickptar
Dr. W. Michael Slattery
Posted by: slattery on Aug 5, 2005 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Government cover-up remains only part of the problem. Media complicity is the other issue that undermines democracy.
In 1977 and 1978, I was back in Japan doing research on a dissertation. For at least four weeks continuously in the spring of 1978, on the front page of the leading four daily Japanese newspapers and within the remaining first four pages of those newspapers, there appeared daily articles on the effects of the US atomic bomb tests in Nevada. Daily circulation for these newpapers were roughly: Yomiuri (15 million), Asahi (9 million), Nihon Keizai (8 million), and Mainichi (7 million). All major US daily newspapers, inclusive of New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Herald Tribune, etc. have offices in the head offices of these Japanese papers, not to mention Time, Newsweek, Life, etc. Yet, not once did these US newpapers or weeklies carry any stories about the terrible effects on people and livestock of the US nuclear testing in Nevada. It was not until the late 1980s that these effects were extensively reported by the US.
When I asked myself why the US media remained silent, even though they had reporters in Tokyo and had English translations of leading Japanese press articles, I could only surmise that their editorial boards were unwilling to expose certain news or the US government, principally the Atomic Energy Commission, had persuaded the US media to suppress stories detrimental to their narrow interests.
Having been to Hiroshima several times and the atomic bomb memorial museum, one cannot be anything but appalled at the severity, inhumanity, and immorality of these atomic weapons. With the US having the most nuclear weapons in the world and the delivery systems to inflict this level of casualty on anyone other than oneself, and given the level of US government expenditure on military (22% of the federal budget and 4.9% of GDP), it is understandable that the US government does not want the public to know about the atrocities inflicted by itself on other societies or the deleterious effects of testing such.
If mainstream media is complicit in hiding this news, then we can only rely on ourselves to report the truth and induce sound analysis in order to deter further corruption of our society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dr. W. Michael Slattery Posted by: PECKERWOOD
"From Atoms To Roswell"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Aug 5, 2005 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When we read of documented government and media coverups such as this, it is no mystery why conspiracy theories about government involvement in the Kennedy assassination, and now the 9/11 tragedy, are rampant.

People need to realize that unrestrained, unexamined government power is capable of almost anything – especially with a media all too willing to help cover it up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nightmares
Posted by: asque on Aug 5, 2005 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was an official report issued on the effects of the atomic bombs that was issued. As a child I found a copy of it in my parent's attic. Living on the border between DC and Maryland, you can only imagine the nights that I lay awake, listening to the sounds of airplanes overhead, knowing my world could end at any moment. There was also a newspaper artical of that era that showed a map of the 23 installations within a 100 miles of DC that the editors thought would be worth an A-bomb.

My parents are still mystified as to why I moved away from the DC area and why I was less interested in the material aspects of life than they expected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We can't admit our guilt
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Aug 5, 2005 4:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The year 1945 was a turning point in world history; for the United States made a deal with the devil to drop two atomic bombs in Japan in order to avoid military casualties. What a lie!
Neither Hiroshima or Nagasaki was of any strategic importance. Hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians were liquidated in minutes. No footage was shown to the public afterwards. Hence we have lived with this guilt for decades and we wonder why we continue to build more of these bombs.
We even had a president who claimed a nuclear war was winnable, right, Reagan?
There are two permanent sores on Japan which will never heal. The fissures run deep into the Japanese psyche.
I am sick to my stomach. I want to tell the Japanese that I am so sorry for what happened in 1945. The Americans possess more nukes than every nation combined yet we feel no justification to stop making them or to use them. War is what we Yanks do best. We don't feel any guilt.
We just invaded Iraq for allegedly having WMD but we have a cache of these bombs at our disposal. Someone please help us!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of Course the U.S. Covers up the Horrible Effects of its Actions!
Posted by: Red Arrow on Aug 6, 2005 7:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this any surprise?
Last night, I attended an Interfaith Gathering to comemorate the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in NYC.
This year - I guess because it's now 60 years since that terrible day - several organizations co-sponsored the event, and there were a thousand or more people in attendance, rather than the usual 200 or 300.
There are still some survivors of that day in Hiroshima (They call themselves "Hibakusha"), and one of them spoke at the event. No bitterness, simply a strongly felt need to witness to the world and seek an end to the use of nuclear weapons. A strong plea for peace.

Dr. Gar Alperovitz, author of "The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb" gave the keynote address with the basic reminder that if we want to prevent the use of such weapons, we need to build the kind of society that has built-in restraints against the sort of hubris that makes even considering inflicting such horrors upon people out of the question. It is OUR work to do this. The government will not.

Most of us already realize that our government will not exercise self-restraint and that it couldn't care less about inflicting horrors on people; but WE DO.
The frustration for most of us is HOW. HOW do we build into our society that common human compassion and decency that we feel we used to have, but have somehow lost?
Did we ever really have it or we just dreaming? I believe we did -- and do. We just forget. We get busy. We get distracted. We want to be distracted. We want . . . anything and everything that will keep us from noticing how empty we feel when we stop running.

Dr. Alperovitz suggests that first we need to let it in. Let what in? Let the impact of our most hideous deeds into our consciousness. Really let ourselves feel what we have done. Not so we will hate ourselves, but so that we can learn from what we have done and know that our hearts really do not want to do such things - that we really want to find better ways to live among other peoples of the world and find ways other than wars to resolve our conflicts.
This can be done. It has to be done. And we can do it. But it takes time. It takes patience. It takes persistence.

The question is . . . are we willing to do it? Are we willing to practice peace, compassion and tolerance for the long haul?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

About the atrocities!!!
Posted by: aries72 on Aug 7, 2005 2:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, I remember those atrocities - Remember watching on newsreels about the concentration camps in Germany and Poland, seeing how they were treated and always came away with much pain and suffering from it.
Remember the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasiki and looking at what really happened, and wondering within myself, WHY?.
Remember later watching the trials of the bomb in the Nevada Desert and how it affected all within a radius of just a few miles.
Yes I believe that somehow by not allowing the public into all of this tyrannical to say the least. And yes the guilt complexes of most of the people who haven't actually seen what can be done, does create guilt and remorse, I believe that is what has happened ti our people over the last 60 years and more, just become like little robots willing to go along with (big government) you've heard the phrase (don't rock the boat) what a joke - but somehow, someway (they) have had their way, time to take them all down and allow LOVE, PEACE to somehow surface, and real CARE for each other world wide, we do not need to obliterate other countries for they are really all our brothers and sisters. War is the greatest sin we have ever committed, doesn't prove anything and certainly doesn't leave a pleasant aftermath.
God bless us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ain't gonna study war no more Posted by: Sojourner
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement