Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

'Rizing' Above?

By Laura Barcella, AlterNet. Posted August 8, 2005.


David LaChapelle's new documentary chronicles the evolution of a dance craze in South Central L.A. -- but skims over harder questions about race.
Rize
Rize

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Laura Barcella

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Renowned fashion photographer David LaChapelle's maniacally-engaging new documentary, Rize, has received a warm reception from critics across the country. Many have lauded LaChapelle's breathtaking cinematography (nearly every frame is bright and beautiful enough to hang in a gallery) and the incredible skill of the young dancers he follows in the film.

Rob Nelson of The Village Voice declared LaChapelle's efforts "infectiously energetic and inspiring," while Rolling Stone's Peter Travers deemed Rize "A knockout! A visual miracle." And Salon's Heather Havrilesky opined about the film: "The breathtaking, animated, at times even aggressive movements you see these kids perform are a bold expression of the pain and suffering they've experienced living in a place where drugs, gun violence and hopelessness can crush the dreams of even the most optimistic."

The trouble with Rize is something most of the above critics neglected to mention: that along with being a movie about dance, Rize is a movie about race. Nearly all of the subjects LaChapelle gives face time to are young African-Americans living in poverty -- many of them men. And some of the disturbing questions LaChapelle brings up -- but fails to answer -- aren't as pretty as his camera work.

Rize is LaChapelle's first film -- an extension of his 2004 short, a Sundance smash called Krumped. The movie documents the evolution of a frenetic, lightning-fast form of dance ("Krumping") born in the drugs-, gang- and violence-addled neighborhood of South Central Los Angeles. Its dancers are primarily black youth, ranging in age from five to 20-something, who practice Krumping as a unique mode of self-expression, and as a way to release pent-up anger, frustration and pain.

The dancers see Krumping as far removed from the "bling-bling," bullshit world of mainstream hip-hop. They take pride in their dancing, exhibiting a healthy sense of ownership over it because they created it by and for themselves. Though insanely talented, the dancers aren't particularly interested in getting rich and famous.

LaChapelle chronicles the trend as it grows bigger, trailing some of its most talented proponents, day by day, as they rehearse, hang out in friends' bedrooms, pray at church, and, much of the time, dance.

In one of the film's first scenes, the dance's unofficial founder, Tommy the Clown (aka "Big Tommy") prepares for a day of entertaining by slowly painting his face clown-white. It's a disturbing image -- a chubby, middle-aged African-American man putting on "Whiteface" to enter the working world -- but it goes unexplored. One wishes that LaChapelle would have provided viewers with some background information -- a quick historical overview, perhaps, of the social and political implications of "Blackface" and "Whiteface." It's not as simple as putting on a costume, though Tommy just considers it part of the clown business.

A local hero of sorts, Tommy prides himself on his strong relationships with South Central youth. He knows everyone by name, and he encourages local kids to train with him in clowning instead of succumbing to the ever-present lure of money and status via drugs and gangs. He is über-positive and supportive -- a father figure to neighborhood children. Late in the film, Tommy breaks down in tears after discovering that his house has been robbed. As he cries, he wonders aloud who would do this to him, considering all of the time and commitment he's given to his neighborhood.

While working with local kids, Big Tommy developed his own form of dance, called "Clowning," in which dancers wore loud costumes and colorful face paint while performing explosive, jerky movements to hip-hop and dance music. The dance was created, in part, as a physical reaction to 1992's L.A. race riots.

As Tommy's students grew older and dispersed, some began forming different groups, in which they practiced "Krumping" (a more individualized, intense version of Clowning). The two brigades (the Clowns and the Krumpers) share a friendly-ish rivalry, and their peers fill Los Angeles' huge Great Western Forum to watch them compete in the Battlezone Competition, a major dance-off.

One of the Krumpers succinctly explains how dancing helps him transform anger into art, releasing aggression without resorting to violence. Another Krumper, the gorgeous "Miss Prissy," seems sad as she talks about the differences between South Central and Hollywood, where she regularly attends ballet classes. She says that she -- and most of her South Central peers -- feel less safe in Hollywood than in their own surroundings, as flawed as those surroundings may seem.


Digg!

Laura Barcella is AlterNet's front page editor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's In Their Blood
Posted by: PECKERWOOD on Aug 8, 2005 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a documentary-- why should La Chapelle be a visible part of it? As far as his "It's in their blood" quote, as a white--some would say racist,too- Southerner, I have observed that the Negro displayed talents that could only have been from the "blood."The Southern Negro work songs on the railroads--the Mississippi Gandy Dancers come to mind--could not have been "learned. These people had never seen African dances. It reminds of the late Mississippi John Lee Hooker from his classic "Boogie Chillun." He says,"Let that boy Boogie Woogie--it's in'em, and it's got'ta to come out."I think that the "boogie Woogie" came from the Negro "buck dancing" I saw as a child growing-up in the rural South in the 1940s.And, too, there was Mississippi Othar Turner,who died at 93 this past Spring, that gave us the "fife and drums" sounds of West Africa.A "trance-like" sound from Othar's bamboo flute and the snare and kettle drums. Othra knew of no African roots--it was "in his blood."Check out his last CD, "From Senagal To Senatobia."BTW, Othar sometimes performed with the North Mississippi All Stars, who will be musical guests on Conan O'Brian this week.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's In Their Blood Posted by: Doyle
» RE: It's In Their Blood Posted by: berrygoldwater2004
» RE: It's In Their Blood Posted by: Wacre
» RE: It's In Their Blood Posted by: berrygoldwater2004
Sandy
Posted by: shwilkins on Aug 8, 2005 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should this director explore 'race' - when his purpose was to explore the 'art' of a people. The living situation of the inhabitants of South Central Los Angeles who happen to be African American is well documented. The 'art' that this living situation produces has not been documented. We don't need another look at race and poverty in South Central - with no concrete answers to solving the problem of poverty, unequal education, lack of hope. If you have an answer to 'poverty' - please share it. However - don't bash a creative soul who sees art; has the ability to appreciate art; and the gift to share art with others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sandy Posted by: Wacre
Art comes from its social context
Posted by: philame on Aug 8, 2005 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Art is a product of the social context so the social context is significant. How can one talk about the blues without talking about slavery and jim crow, how can one talk about riot grrls without talking about feminism and punk diy culture? The social context is important.

Just because there are no simple solutions to an issue - in this case how poverty and racism impact artists - does not mean it should not be discussed. If we follow that logic, then Alternet should not exist because it covers issues on a dailybasis that do not have easy solutions.

After just reading a book on early blueswomen, it struck me how sad and pathetic it is that another generation of talented African American artists and the amazing new artform they created are being ignored and neglected. Token coverage by Lachapelle is not enough to counter that but I am looking forward to seeing the token coverage and it will give these artists recognition for their work!

But then again, the entertainment industry is not really set up to value artists of any skin color. Like many of us, they approach artists with a cookie cutter mentality and if these kids decided to conform to the bling, bling culture they'd have few barriers to getting recognition probably because that's a pre-existing money-making category. No thinking or risk required.

So yes, race and poverty are an issue and the entertainment industry and what it recognizes as art is also an issue. Sad that LaChapelle, as an artist himself, shied away from these issues. Great article!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Philame, another perspective... Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» Thank you for answering, Philame... Posted by: HeidiLockwood
Not enough...
Posted by: jvogel on Aug 8, 2005 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My gut reaction is defensive. I want to say, well, at least this film got made. But throwing a bone to the black community in South Central LA is not enough, not enough for any of the cast members, for the community members and certainly not enough for the black community in this country or the world. Lachapelle touched on racial tension, violence and the concept of an interconnected diaspora. But that is not enough. My eyes were open to the social issues his film mentioned and they resonated with me, because I am interested, but without spelling these issues out, without defining them clearly, those who see the film as a prolonged music video will not be affected. As I sat in the movie theater, I was deeply moved by this film that, to me, embodies a fundamental concept of hip hop, the use of art to combat violence and poverty, the use of creative power to cure society's disease. Others arround me felt differently. To me, Big Tommy, was struggling, but he would "rize" with each stroke against him. The pain he felt at losing his young dancer to a shooting and finding his home in shambles was hard, and he did not hold back his emotions before the camera. This touched me, his tears brought on my own, but to others he was a crying clown, and they laughed.

Good point about the face paint. Its true, there are many racial connotations to the choice of white face paint, as there are with all stylistic choices. White clowns also use white face paint. If you mention the face paint, you could mention any number of other things, hair straightening and dying, for example. White is right still leaks into society, slithering through every tradition and trend. I think they need to be dealt with, but one man could not have carried out the task.

About the African dance insertion, I think there is undeniably a connection btw. hip hop and African rhythm and dance. Just because these dancers hadn't studied it doesn't mean there is no connection. Hip hop music and freestyling has a connection with African rhythm and music and krumping/clowning evolved out of the dances that came before it. There is something inherent about it. I wish you could explain further why this remark seemed racist or offensive. I think any black person would be honored to believe its "in their blood." I know I am.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not enough... Posted by: philame
» RE: Not enough... Posted by: ALANHESTER
Without a DNA Test
Posted by: iamsenstiveyellow on Aug 8, 2005 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do you know he's not of African heritage?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DANCE IS DANCE AND IT SHOULD BE ENOUGH!
Posted by: ElectricG on Aug 8, 2005 11:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw the film about a month ago, and as a filmmaker and a person who grew up in the ghetto of LA and been part of the struggle yet also seen Hip Hop and Underground Dance culture blossom in LA I can honestly say that this movie explores the theme of 'race' to the point it needs to be explored without getting out the theme of the film. It is obvious to the viewer where these kids live and the dangers they face. In fact, one of the dancers is killed during the making of the movie bringing the point home. But the message of the film is DANCE. And how DANCE liberates THE SOUL. And you don't have to be black, white, brown, rich or poor to enjoy DANCE specially when there is a SPIRITUAL CONNECTION to the DANCE. I feel the writter of this article is reaching trying to make an issue that is really taking away from the CELEBRATION the film is trying to reach. The writter is looking at the glass half empty instead of half full. I for one, cried several times in the film because I personally did not need a historical recount of black history to know that these kids don't have much going for themselves yet they are celebrating life like any human being should. So in other words, like we say in the ghetto, DON'T HATE! PARTICIPATE SUCKA!!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Abstractionits stereoetyping hurts everyone
Posted by: berrygoldwater2004 on Aug 9, 2005 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The substance of this article as well as the "Crash" article are basically the same. You shouldn't have a movie with minorities without making the point racial. Or more importantly about how whitey is keeping down minorities and not giving them their fair share. Or something along those lines. I believe this sort of commentary is often prejudice, bigoted, victim identity oriented, and politically driven. Not to mention borderline racist. And many of the posts, written by minorities and others seem to concure.

A movie about dance can be just that, a movie about dance. Just as a movie with people of color in it can be about the people, not their color. Or a movie with a homosexual person in it doesn't have to be about homophobia. That's not saying there's no homophobia in the world it's just saying there's more to a homosexual person than their sex.

To demand that every movie be about race, gender identity or class is doing a disservice to the human aspects everyone shares. It also devalues the characters, and thereby real people, by making them a stereotype and a political pawn. Likewise it limits a characters potential by giving them a script of reactions that more and more come off as contrived, shallow and unrealistic.

I believe alot of people are getting fed up with seeing themselves portrayed in movies as one dimentional characters. Asians as kung-fu artists who speak in proverbs, elderly black men as empathetic sages or young black men as street harden rebels with a heart of gold, women as sex objects or tough moms, whites as urban geeks or country crackers or racist cops. It's all real tried and tired.

To always attempt to define things within the context of racial, sexual, or class conflict comes of as shallow, agenda driven and abstractionist; existing more in theory than in reality. It is also an easy answer to complex questions; like saying the lack of decent jobs in America is because of Mexicans or you're not meeting women because of feminism. It avoids the fact that there is every kind of person dealing with every kind of reality in the best and worst ways they know how.

Stereotypes, gross generalizations and forced indentification insults everyones diversity even if the perpetrator claims to have alturistic motives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» All true, Berry... Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE:HeidiLockwood, I'll defer to you on art Posted by: berrygoldwater2004
» to Berry, continued Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: to Berry, continued Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» Kitty Kat... Posted by: HeidiLockwood
You broke the first rule of film criticism
Posted by: rbohan on Aug 12, 2005 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Review the movie they made, not the one you wish they had made or you would have made.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

She wasn't paying enough attention to the film
Posted by: papibear on Oct 31, 2005 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ms. Bacerra states that she finds it disconcerting when LaChappelle intersplices documentary footage of African tribal dancers with the krumpers at one point, but she very conveniently forgets that Dragon, one of the krumpers being interviewed right before this sequence (and leading into it), very clearly says to the camera, "There's not just a bunch of people acting wild. This is an art form. It's just as valid as your ballet, as your waltz, as your tap dance, except that we wouldn't have to go to school for this, 'cause it was already implanted in us....from birth." So the inferrence that this style of dance is "in the blood" is something the dancers themselves are stating.

Ms. Bacerra should view films without taking notes during the middle of them, because it's clear that she utterly missed the point that was being made by that sequence, which was that despite the many generations removed from Africa these youngsters might be, despite their poor and violent urban surroundings, the spirit of Africa still rises from within them and reminds them of exactly who they are, and that this is something to celebrate. When I saw the film in the theater I immediately recognized this, and now that I have the DVD I see it again. And it is a beautiful thing to see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]