Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

From Defender of Nature to 'Eco-Terrorist'

By Kelly Hearn, AlterNet. Posted August 2, 2005.


Did Tre Arrow take environmental activism too far, or is the FBI desperate to make arrests in its domestic 'war on terror?'
Tre Arrow
Tre Arrow

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Kelly Hearn

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Tre Arrow's unwitting trajectory from candidate for Congress to the FBI's most wanted "eco-terrorist" began on Easter Sunday in 2001, when a firebomb equipped with a fuse destroyed $200,000 worth of gravel trucks belonging to Ross Island Sand & Gravel, a company operating near a national forest in Oregon.

Two months later, on June 1, another arson attack destroyed a logging truck and damaged two others belonging to Schoppert Logging, a company involved in watershed logging operations near Eagle Creek, Oregon. The damage was estimated at $50,000.

Soon the FBI was looking for Tre Arrow, a local green activist who'd made a name for himself as an in-your-face eco-defender, a man the feds said was linked to the Earth Liberation Front (something Arrow denies). Born Michael Scarpitti, Arrow had a reputation to match his passion. He'd once spent eleven days perched on a nine-inch ledge atop of the U.S. Forest Service building in Portland, Ore., protesting the proposed sale of timber rights in Eagle Creek. He was the consummate non-stop activist, a barking dog who in 2000 ran for Congress as a Pacific Green Party candidate, managing to win some 15,000 votes in a bid for Oregon's Third Congressional District.

For his straight talk and ballsy belligerence, Rolling Stone would call him an "environmental rock star." The feds had a different name.

By December 2002, Arrow was an "eco-terrorist" on the FBI's ten most wanted list. Facing a minimum of 40 years to life for his alleged role in the bombings, Arrow had already slipped into Canada earlier that year. He assumed the name Josh Murray (sometimes Josh Rivers) and spent nearly a year traveling, playing music and volunteering until he was arrested by Canadian police during what Arrow says was an activist mission.

Now a cause celebre among many environmentalist, he's fighting extradition and has applied for political refugee status in Canada. But a Canadian judge last month ruled that enough evidence existed to send the thirty-something, yoga-practicing musician back home to stand trail. His lawyer is appealing the decision.

Avoiding the "T-Word"

In two telephone interviews from the North Fraser Pretrial Centre, a prison east of Vancouver, Canada, Arrow talked to AlterNet about his innocence, the FBI's focus on eco-terrorism, corporate excesses, institutional vendettas and the criminalization of dissent in the name of corporate interest.

The obvious first question is, Did he do it?

"I have been emphatic in declaring my innocence," Arrow says. "The kind of activism I engage in has been well documented as being non-violent civil disobedience." He said he's only run afoul with the law for civil disobedience, for which he has received community service. Never anything violent. Besides, Arrow says arson is incongruent with his beliefs. His law, he says, is that of the Iroquois: "In every deliberation we must consider the impact on the seventh generation. That's how I live my life, so even when I sleep in the woods, I don't burn twigs because of the carbon dioxide," he said. "I would never endorse arson because of the pollution involved in burning tires and plastic."

Arrow doesn't hesitate when asked about why he got locked up. "Basically, the FBI targeted me because I'm an activist," he said. "That's the FBI's modus operandi: They target anyone who gets in the way of the status quo, anyone they view as a threat, or as subversive. They view me as a threat because I talk about truth and expose lies. And my civil disobedience has been effective." As for the three witnesses that testified against him, "they received less than three and a half years in exchange for implicating me. The FBI wanted them to say I brainwashed them into doing it so they would have an excuse to bring the hammer down on me."

Arrow is particularly frustrated with how officials misuse the terrorist label. "I refuse to even say the 't-word,'" he says. "These days anybody that doesn't follow the corporate agenda in the United States is labeled that."

The FBI claims that he was working with the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) , one of the government's prime targets. He denies any links to the group, but he also won't condemn their methods.

"I'm not here to say what's right or wrong," he said. "You have to look at several things when you're talking about groups that engage in actions that focus on property destruction while making efforts to see that no living thing is hurt. But here you have right wing groups that murder people and somehow are viewed as less of a threat. So our civil rights and human rights are being violated, and that's less of a priority than corporate profit and government greed. Humans are killing each other and that's seen as a lesser threat than activist trying to stop degradation of the environment by using arson as a tactic. It's indicative of the times. Again, anybody who stands in the way of a corporate agenda to protect air, water and soil is labeled with the t-word ... I recognize ELF practices hurt corporations where it counts, in their pocketbook. And that's why they are at the top of the FBI's domestic terrorist list."

The fact that Arrow is facing life in prison for a crime that caused no human casualties is, in part, a result of the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. U.S. lawmakers stiffened sentences for domestic terrorism in the aftermath of the attack, and the FBI is increasingly focusing its domestic anti-terrorist campaigns on environmental activists.

Arrow's Oregon-based attorney, Paul Loney, told AlterNet that Arrow is charged with 14 counts, including conspiracy to interfere with interstate commerce by means of arson, as well as using destructive devices, namely the fuse-equipped plastic gasoline jugs used in the Ross Island truck bombing. In a July interview with Agence France-Presse, Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephen Peifer in Portland said Arrow's alleged actions are considered domestic terrorism. "It is a systematic attempt to use the threat of violence to instill fear for political or social purposes," he said.

"They're trying to allege that I had this incendiary device so they can fit my case into this code," says Arrow. "That's why this spectacular charge."

Life on the Run, Life Behind Bars

While authorities were hunting him in the U.S., Arrow traveled from Ontario to British Columbia, continuing an activist lifestyle and volunteering for a non-profit that collected discarded food for the needy. He was arrested, he said, for using bolt cutters to unlock dumpsters that contained reusable resources.

In prison, Arrow says there's no grass, "no wild things," and he's confined to a double-bunked cell 18 hours a day. His supporters help lift his spirits. His sister and a group of friends stay in contact and raise money. His website, TreArrow.org, helps cultivate support from all over the world, from a German housewife to film and television executives in Los Angeles to fellow activists such as Julia Butterfly Hill. (Though he won't mention names, he says a movie project about his life is in the works).

Pressed by a 30-minute call limit, Arrow talks fast, passionately, emphatically but conspicuously devoid of anger, not even swear words. His yoga and meditation keep him centered, he said, but he lives with near constant anxiety on some level. He never gets bored, keeping constantly busy writing (a possible book), composing music (though no instruments), tidying his cell or reading (whatever's in the book cart -- currently the prison writings of jailed Native American activist Leonard Peltier). He says that some nights, without warning, the lights flip on, guards enter and toss his belongings on the floor, take his food, and cop big attitudes. "Not all the staff are like that, though," he says, calmly.

Then, as if shooting for understatement of the year, he says, "I guess you could say this is a pretty difficult situation to endure sometimes."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Kelly Hearn is a former UPI staff writer who lives in Washington DC and Latin America. His work has appeared in the Christian Science Monitor, American Prospect, and other publications.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The US Government is the Terrorist
Posted by: metahope on Aug 2, 2005 12:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It sound like this man is being punished for what he has said and believes in, not for what he has done. The government may have some of the real conspirators in jail. People who commit violent destructive crimes are lacking in rational morals. It is not beyond belief that the government told the conspirators to say that Tre Arrow brainwashed them into firebombing some gravel trucks just to get their own sentences reduced.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oooo...FBI gets tough on "tree-hugging hippie"
Posted by: sausage on Aug 2, 2005 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Criminitly! The FBI won't catch Islamic terrorists who learn how to fly planes into buildings, even after field agents alert supervisors, but they can go after a guy who allegedly firebombed gravel trucks. The FBI takes years to catch a murderer like women's health clinic bomber Eric Rudolph but they're on Tre Arrow like stink on sh*t for allegedly firebombing a logging truck!

Sure, what athorities allege are crimes but should it be a federal case? Couldn't Oregon state district courts handle this? Of course not, the case is as weak as George Bush's case for invading Iraq so it's off to Federal Kangaroo Court!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DON'T BUY...the ultimate in Corpie Terrorism
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 2, 2005 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with Arrow. The Corpies have ruined millions of human lives with their production and working comditions,but caused the premature extinction of countless lifeforms.Yes some of us are moved to action.Some good some not so good.The fact is we are fighting the fight that doesn't make headlines.The fight for not only your life and mine but the lives of every living thing.The folks that don't understand that are the folks that are killing us all,for money! The Corpies have become the "King George' of their day and they need to be stopped.Sure they've bought the cops,owned politicians and
even use hired thugs to get what they want,no headlines there either.Not surprizing,they own the media. Now for the
last seven generations we've been trying to keep a handle on these corpies. Laws were passed in the late 1800's making the
Corpies subservient to the Constitution, labor and environmental laws were created,with heavy taxes to keep
them socially responsible. By the time FDR,Kennedy,Nixon,Reagan,and Bush got done with us,all theprotections for the people were in the crapper and the Corpies were 'outside' the Constitution. How did that happen?
Well it starts with the Corpies owning many diffrent businesses
with slick images and slogans,cramming it down your throat a zillion time a day,and ends with all of us buying their stuff and
keeping them chugging along. So you have to hurt them where they live....the pocketbook.Forget damaging the equipment,impair their ability to buy the stuff buy not shopping at 'partner' outlets. Boycott them out of business.
Ignore the fat money they offer to accept their ways.There's
no amount of money that can replace pure water,clean air,and productive soils.A boycott will remedy that. A
National Stirke will back it up, followed by a complete housecleaning in D.C.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course we don't know if he did it, but in either case "Good for Him"!
Posted by: Pepper on Aug 2, 2005 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frankly, I am happy the ELF organization is costing Corporate America Billions of dollars in damages. He probably didn't do it, but even if he did, I would love to be on that jury and do nullification by letting him go free.

I wish there were more of them. It appears now though, that we as potential jurors need to start paying attention and doing our jury duty when called. It also appears that more and more innocent people will be arrested for non crimes against anyone except property.

The prison system has now gone private which is why we have the largest prison population based on population in the world. Money and greed without regard to the lives and the ruination it causes. The jury room is where we can fight back, so lets do it. Lets take those jury summons and show up for democracy and let them go free.

ITS US AGAINST THEM AND DON'T THINK OTHERWISE. IT WILL GET WORSE BEFORE IT GETS BETTER. This is the stage in the nazification of Germany where Hitler started arresting dissidents and having them shot. Also remember it was the Reischstag burning that began the specific persecution of the jews. We know what happened after that.

This is serious folks. P

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right or Wrong???
Posted by: jefhadist on Aug 2, 2005 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While your life/actions are noble and totally defensible morally (and every other which way)...when you state "I'm not here to say what's right or wrong," I get a bit confused. Haven't you been saying what is right and what is wrong by your actions for all these many years? Don't we need to condemn violence in all it's various and nefarious forms? Aren't the right-wing forms of violence exactly the same as the left's when it comes down to it? Maybe violence could be justified for self-defense if there is absolutely no other way but blowing up construction equipment doesn't seem to fit the criteria. What ever happened to putting sugar in the fuel tanks?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ight or Wrong??? Posted by: bgann
» Rhett Butler said it best... Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: Right or Wrong??? Posted by: elfrijole1
» RE: Right or Wrong??? Posted by: koala
» RE:Right or Wrong??? Posted by: LaVieja
Peak timber, peak oil.
Posted by: mymarkx on Aug 2, 2005 8:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems pretty simple to me. We passed peak timber a long time ago. We'd cut down most of the trees in this country and had a diminishing supply of timber. The desperation to cut the remaining timber causes the corporatocracy to call environmentalists terrorists.

Now we've passed peak oil. If you have a hybrid car, you're probably going to be next on the FBI's most wanted list.

When this country had its fat years, it didn't think to put anything away for future lean years--underfunded pension plans are just the tip of the iceberg.

Our national credit card is maxed out and we've been having trouble making the minimum payments. I wonder who the Mayan civilization blamed when it happened to them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Peak timber, peak oil. Posted by: Merchant_Of_Menace
corporate metabolism
Posted by: schnoggi on Aug 2, 2005 9:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here is an excellent article on how corporations have become the dominant lifeform on the planet, pass it on.

http://www.tripzine.com/articles.asp?id=corporate_metabolism

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: corporate metabolism Posted by: Merchant_Of_Menace
Bizaro World
Posted by: nakis on Aug 2, 2005 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sometimes I just believe that somehow we ended up in bizaro world. Jail the pacifists and celebrate the killers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bizaro World Posted by: Merchant_Of_Menace
» RE: Bizaro World Posted by: LaVieja
Rough Justice
Posted by: dm65047 on Aug 2, 2005 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This does not surprise me at all, Bush recently stated that the biggest threat to homeland security was from activists such as Tre, people who are trying to confront the America Inc. and stop the rape that is destroying a beautiful country.
While it makes me angry that U.S. citizens are treated this way, here in England our civil rights are being slowly eroded in the name of protection from the terrorist. So far the eco/animal rights activist aren't being targeted, but they've recently made protest in front of parliment illegal unless you are granted permission from the government. This is a right that we've had for centuries, and now it's gone because the MP's didn't like being confronted with dissent.

How long until our countries stand up to this draconian tyranny and start real progression towards a more peaceful and respectful way of life?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why is Eric Rudolph Never Called a Terrorist?
Posted by: raian_sumisu on Aug 2, 2005 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eric Rudolph, the hate-filled Christian terrorist responsible for killing two people and wounding hundreds, is called a "bomber" and a "devout Christian" but is never called a terrorist in the media or by the FBI. The label "terrorist" fits the cowardly Rudolph perfectly. Over the last decade or so Christian terrorists have phoned in hundreds of Anthrax threats to abortion clinics, have murdered abortion clinic doctors, planted bombs at clinics and gay bars and clubs, and have generally terrorized abortion clinic staff. I'm not saying the FBI has done nothing to stop these terrorist activities, but I am saying that a threat to mindless capitalistic ideology (posed by ELF) is more grave in their eyes than those threats to human life posed by Eric Rudolph, Terry Nichols and the Christian hate group that both were inspired by, the Christian Identity. The fact remains that Christian terrorists have exclusively placed bombs to kill and maim, and eco-saboteurs have consistently maintained their objective is to destroy property and machines and never human life. The double standards applied by the FBI show that Tre Arrow has been targeted for his outspoken and non-violent beliefs rather than any crime he may have committed. We need to stand up for Tre Arrow and those who will undoubtedly be persecuted for their activism in the future.

Some relevant links:

Juan Cole on the "terrorist" label:
www.juancole.com (enter Eric Rudolph in Search engine at bottom)

FBI goons on the Eco threat:
www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0520-05.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Say what? Posted by: Sojourner
» New label Posted by: nickptar
Governor Brian Schweitzer shows one of the ways Montana and likely other states
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 2, 2005 6:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
can get off the dependency of foreign oil:

Schweitzer wants to convert Otter Creek coal into liquid fuel

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A braveheart Idahoan also joins the fight to lessen our dependence on oil in the mideast
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 2, 2005 6:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can Things Be Terrorized?
Posted by: badger on Aug 2, 2005 8:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope Tre Arrow's lawyer has already figured out what defines a terrorist. If you check the dictionary, "terror" is an emotion. Were someone to (hypothetically) point a gun or brandish a Molotov cocktail at you, chances are you'll feel something close to, or actual terror. Do the same thing to a logging truck, and it will feel ... nothing. Property cannot be terrorized!! Ergo, there was no act of terrorism, only civil disobediance in the form of property destruction, and nobody got physically hurt. Case dismissed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hmm...
Posted by: Jordon on Aug 3, 2005 2:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anybody remember when a large number of Saudis, either members of or having connections to the Bin Laden family were authorized to flee the country immedeatly preceding 9/11? All other civilian flights were grounded, and yet members of the family that orchestrated the largest terrorist attack in American history were allowed to leave the country! But now, an accused "eco-terrorist", who, even if guilty, did not kill anyone, is awaiting trail on flimsy-at-best evidence??? We've all heard enough about the links between the Bush family, the House of Saud and the Bin Laden family, but such blatant hypocrasy can no longer be ignored. The mainstream media must start being critical of the administration, it must start asking "why", its not "unpatriotic" to question ones government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MSM Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: hmm... Posted by: LaVieja
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement