Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Wal-Mart's Semi-Green Week

By Kelly Hearn, AlterNet. Posted July 28, 2005.


Last week, Wal-Mart opened an "eco-store" replete with wind turbines and bio-fuel recycling. It also applied for a banking license in Utah. Will the superstore never stop?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Kelly Hearn

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Looking to shave operating costs and revive a wilting reputation, Wal-Mart last week unveiled an eco-friendly store near Dallas, Texas, an experimental Supercenter complete with wind turbines, rain-harvesting ponds, bio-fuel recycling and no flush urinals.

For Wal-Mart's purveyors of aw-shucks public relations, the event was a softball. Press documents gushed with enthusiasm and statistics, while officials trumpeted the store's expected savings in water and energy consumption. The retail goliath even said it plans to share its best practices to help the entire retail industry become greener.

Some of the highlights:

  • Bioswales, or channels of shrubs, grass and rock were planted to snag pollutants and help clean water, while permitting it to infiltrate into the ground and replenish groundwater sources.
  • Improved refrigeration systems were built to save 645,000 kilowatts annually, enough power for 65 single family homes for an entire year.
  • Condensation from the store's air conditioning and refrigeration systems will be stored in a pond on the east side of the building, and used to help irrigate the landscaping.
  • A mix of recycled cooking and automotive oil will help heat the facility.
  • Waterless, odorless urinals that keep smells down using a special oil film will result in water savings of hundreds of thousands of gallons per year.

Wal-Mart has contracted the Oak Ridge National Laboratory to test and analyze the system over a three-year period and the company says it plans to share its best practices.

"Sharing the results of the store's experiments with the rest of the retail and development industry could turn low-volume, rare technologies into industry standards," said a company statement. "Wal-Mart hopes to learn new environmental conservation best management practices and benchmarks that will serve as future design standards in the retail industry when it comes to land development and building construction."

The company is working to build a conservationist reputation, publicizing the fact it pays to preserve one acre of wildlife habitat for every acre it develops. It also floats recycling statistics. Last year, it recycled 2.8 million tons of cardboard, 9,416 tons of plastic, 262 million aluminum cans, glass containers and plastic bottles, and 49 million disposable cameras.

Recent greening aside, it's easy to imagine the waste that falls through the cracks in Wal-Mart's 3,500 facilities in the U.S. alone (company documents say there are also 1,290 international facilities).

A Different Shade of Green

Perhaps not coincidentally, last week's feel-good environmental story hit the news cycle as Wal-Mart made a briefer and markedly less effusive announcement that it was applying for a banking license in Utah.

On July 19 the company asked the Utah Department of Financial Institutions and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for permission to operate an industrial bank which will reside in Salt Lake City and have local employees and board members.

Officials said the intention is to save processing fees currently paid to third party financial institutions that process Wal-Mart's monthly load of 140 million credit, debit and electronic check payments. There will be limited deposits from non-profit and charitable organizations, but the company has "no plans to operate branch banks" and "will not engage in lending of any type," according to a press statement.

The "no-branch" pledge did little to put the banking industry at ease. The Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) responded that the world's largest corporation has the financial prowess to drive credit unions and community banks out of business. It already offers check cashing, wire transfers and money order services for nearly half what other services charge. Small banks fear that an "everyday low cost" Wal-Mart bank -- one that accepts deposits and doles out consumer loans -- could one day appear in every store, eviscerating customer bases. They also worry that Wal-Mart could engage in preferential loaning practices to its affiliates or refuse loans to competitors of an affiliate or parent company. What's more, industrial banks are not regulated by the FDIC.

Why Utah? "We made the decision to file in Utah because of the state industrial banking laws and it is natural to locate in the state capital," said Wal-Mart spokeswoman Sharon Weber in an email.

The company has been trying to elbow its way into banking for several years but has failed in past attempts to acquire financial institutions, most notably in California and Oklahoma. But it seems likely that in Utah, where companies such as Target and General Electric have established industrial banks, things might go easier.

If they do, the introduction to freelance journalist John Dicker's new book, United States of Wal-Mart, will taste even truer.

''It's hard to know exactly when it happened, just as it's impossible to know when, or if, it will end," Dicker writes. "But for now it's clear: we're all Wal-Mart's bitches."

Digg!

Kelly Hearn is a former UPI staff writer who lives in Washington DC and Latin America. His work has appeared in the Christian Science Monitor and American Prospect.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
cycler
Posted by: cycler on Jul 28, 2005 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Readers may be interested to know that a proposed Walmart for Vancouver BC, with all the 'green' bell and whistles as in the above article, was turned down by city council. One of the chief reasons for the refusal may be that just the fact of acres of parking encourages buyers to drive long distances thus negating all the other green features.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cycler Posted by: cycler
Diversionary Publicity Stunts
Posted by: Bimbeot on Jul 29, 2005 2:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wal-Mart could have been building these "green" buildings a long time ago. Back then it was about cost and not spending a dime more than it had to, now it's about winning people over who won't let them build and saving money on energy (not the actual saving of energy) which pays for green building and not some sort of business ethics or caring.

Check out the article at Hometown Advantage:

Response to Wal-Mart's New "Green" Store in McKinney, Texas
From the Institute for Local Self-Reliance

The highlights are that the Wal-Mart model is still very polluting especially with over 200 abandoned stores creating polluted run-off; building on the edges of towns (including the new store in the Alternet story above) and on previously undeveloped land, creating need for driving everywhere which has contributed to a 40% rise in vehicle miles since 1990; and insisting on building on/paving over environmently important lands like in Bangor Maine. Building green is more than a press release.

Something else I've discovered recently is Walton Enterprises (the family behind Wal-Mart & American's richest) already owns Arvest Bank, Community Publishers (newspapers that tow the company line), and a construction company that builds their stores and distribution warehouses.

Not to mention the politicians it owns.

Not only are we becoming the "United States of Wal-Mart" but the world is being taken over too.

But if you can't keep Wal-Mart out then at least insist they build green. ONE building out of 3,500 doesn't mitigate what they've already done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't break an arm
Posted by: Michael Turnauer, Vancouver,WA on Jul 29, 2005 11:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope Wal-Mart's PR dept don't dislocate their shoulders in self-congratulations for their "green" efforts. All of the "highlights" listed in the article look like money-saving initiatives which are now being exploited for Brownie points.

Let me know when Wal-Mart pays its people well enough to afford to drive newer, less poluting cars or when they demand that their contract manufacturers in China and elsewhere be held to the same environmental standards (at minimum) as the rest of the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]