Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

AFL-CIO Shakedown

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted July 25, 2005.


After four of the nation's biggest labor unions announced their plans to boycott the AFL-CIO convention in Chicago this week, the future of organized labor hangs in the balance.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Amy Goodman

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's Note: Four of the nation's largest labor unions have announced they will boycott the AFL-CIO convention this week to protest the direction of the federation. The dissident unions represent about one-third of the A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s 13 million members — they include The Service Employees International Union, the Teamsters, United Food and Commercial Workers and UNITE HERE, which represents textile and hotel workers.

The New York Times reports that two of the unions -- the SEIU and the Teamsters -- are expected to announce today that they are quitting the federation entirely.

The service employees, with 1.8 million members, and the Teamsters, with 1.4 million, are two of the biggest unions in the A.F.L.-C.I.O. They contribute $20 million dollars each year, or about one-sixth of its budget. The Times calls the split "the biggest rift in labor since the 1930's."

At the heart of the dispute is the decline of organized labor. From a high point of 22.8 million union members in 1978, the ranks of organized labor have dwindled to 15.5 million in 2004.

Dissenting unions have formed their own organization, the Change to Win Coalition, which they hope will foster union growth through organized campaigns against giant companies like Wal-Mart.

The boycotting unions are especially dissatisfied with the leadership of John Sweeney, who has served as AFL-CIO president for the past decade and has been criticized for not investing enough in grassroots organizing.

The A.F.L.-C.I.O. is the nation's main labor federation, a grouping of 56 unions.

Sweeney told the Times, "Not to attend the convention, especially when the differences that remain between our proposals are so narrow, is an insult to their union brothers and sisters, and to all working people."

Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! spoke with Jonathan Tasini, former president of the National Writers Union, and author of WorkingLife, a blog of the AFL-CIO convention.

AMY GOODMAN: We go to Chicago right now to Jonathan Tasini, former president of the National Writers Union, and who runs the blog WorkingLife.org. Welcome to Democracy Now!, Jonathan Tasini.

JONATHAN TASINI: It's a pleasure to be here, Amy.

AMY GOODMAN: It's good to have you with us. Why don't you run down for us what happened this weekend?

JONATHAN TASINI: Well, first of all, it is very hot here... The Change to Win Coalition, as you mentioned in the lead-up, announced yesterday that they were not going to attend the convention. That includes, by the way, the Farm Workers and the Laborers. Those two are actually going to the convention. The four that you mentioned are not going to the convention.

And you are right, it looks like the Service Employees Union and the Teamsters are going to announce that they are actually leaving the federation this afternoon. The Sweeney supporters held a very exuberant and boisterous rally prior to the announcement by the Change to Win Coalition, and I have to say I was surprised at the anger and almost venom that was expressed by many of the speakers.

Linda Chavez-Thompson, the executive vice president of the AFL-CIO, ran down a list of the enemies of labor, mentioned George Bush, the Right to Work Committee, the Chamber of Commerce, and then her last description was the Change to Win Coalition. So it's pretty heated right now.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about the significance of what this means? What it means not to have these unions at the convention, and ultimately, to have the federation split up like this at this time of corporate power?

JONATHAN TASINI: Well, you know, I'm sort of torn by what I feel about this, and I have written a lot about this in the last few weeks.

The future of labor...hangs in the balance; but not so much, in my opinion, because of the differences internally in the federation. When you're less than 8% of the private sector work force, and you're declining, and employers have the upper hand and you have terrible trade agreements, working America and labor unions have been really beaten down. And so the question, and I have raised this a number of times, is whether either "side" has the answer to some very vexing problems and tremendous challenges.

And I'm not so sure that the fact that these unions are trying to start something new -- and they may -- a number of them may or may not leave the AFL-CIO. They may remain in the AFL-CIO, but work within the Change to Win Coalition. They have some pretty interesting, big campaigns against big employers on the drawing board. So if they're successful, that may help the labor movement as a whole. The labor movement is a lot bigger than just the structure of the AFL-CIO.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Here's a better solution and trust me, it works
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 25, 2005 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of doing their business meetings in same old big cities, why don't these people learn to frame the issue of the beauty of labor unions and stop worrying about the money. They could take a look at states like Indiana, where my aunt, despite her social conservatism tells me how heartbroken everything is in the state especially when it comes to labor and its decline. Hell, steel's the only thing keeping that state alive and I wish the AFL-CIO would take a trip to that state where labor and unionization was once the lifeblood of that state. Or better yet, come over to states where some of my other relatives live in such as North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Nebraska, and Montana. There are plenty of folks who could benefit from the true beauty of organized labor. If AFL-CIO is serious about getting back their victory in labor, they should stop showing up on the rightwing corporate media networks and learn to convince voters across this nation especially in middle America to identify with them. I swear, at times, these labor leaders keep trying to use the corporate model just like the DLC wing of the Democratic party continues to do and our country is left in failing mode as a result !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What organized labor has been lacking
Posted by: bornxeyed on Jul 25, 2005 2:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Organized labor lost its political clout 25 years ago when Reagan fired all the air traffic controllers. Afterward, when the planes failed to drop from the skies due to inexperienced replacements, it was pretty much over for Labor's ability to threaten to bring the wheels of the nation to a grinding halt.

Now, in the era of New Colonialism going under the euphemism "Globalization", Labor has lost any economic clout as well. It's only course is to negotiate for wages and benefits in competition with inexpensive, exploited, unorganized multinational labor pools. And it can't win. Demand too much from Management and they can simply walk away, set up shop in another country and, it seems, get tax breaks for doing so.

I mourn the death throes of Organized Labor, but maybe the enfracturement will allow new ideas to be tried. There is a diminishing base of skilled labor in this country, as more people become professionals and even more are left with few job choices other than unskilled service and distribution jobs. Neither are capable of refilling Union ranks. This trend has been going on since Reagan as well.

If you're chained to a sinking ship, not that I hope that is what Labor has become, it makes sense to cut the rope and try to float on your own. Maybe a better structured Organized Labor can emerge from the waves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]