comments_imageCOMMENTS: 22

President Bush Doesn't Speak For Me

Why did civil rights activist Charles Evers join the Republican Party? Because, 'I can do more destructive things inside than I can out there throwing rocks.'
July 22, 2005  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
In 1963, Charles Evers' older brother, Medgar Evers, was shot and killed by white supremacist Byron De La Beckwith. Beckwith stood trial twice, but in both cases the all-white jury could not reach a verdict. He was finally convicted and sentenced to life in prison in 1994, 31 years after the murder. Before his murder, Medgar established local chapters of the NAACP throughout the Mississippi Delta and organized boycotts of businesses that refused to allow blacks to use their restrooms. After an unsuccessful attempt to get into the University of Mississippi Law School, Medgar was appointed as the NAACP's first field secretary in Mississippi.

After his brother's death, Charles Evers took over at the NAACP and began black voter registration drives. Six years later, he was elected mayor of Fayette, Mississippi, the first black to hold elected office in the state since Reconstruction. Evers, who became a Republican during the Nixon years, also served as an advisor to a diverse group of politicians, including Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon and Reagan.

Today the 82-year-old Evers is the general manager of WMPR, a community radio station in Jackson, Mississippi. He hosts a radio show on Wednesday nights called, "Let's Talk," and is the author of "Have No Fear: The Charles Evers Story." He proudly displays a number of framed photos of himself shaking hands with a wide array of mostly Republican politicians and civil rights leaders in his office.

ROSE AGUILAR: How did you feel about the Killen ruling? [On June 22, Edgar Ray Killen, a former Ku Klux Klan leader, was sentenced to 60 years in prison for orchestrating the murder of black Mississippian James Chaney and white New Yorkers Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner in 1964.]

CHARLES EVERS: I'm elated. I almost shed tears knowing that they convicted an old racist. It's unbelievable. We've begun to get justice. We've begun to put fear into those whites who think they can do anything they want to a black person and get away with it. Now we got white powerful Mississippians who say, no, you can't do that anymore, and I'm proud of that.

I've been talking to a lot of people about politics and it's interesting to talk to young people. I went to the Jubilee Jam the other night and I interviewed a number of young black men who said, blacks vote Democrat. Whites vote Republican. I told them I've met a lot of whites who vote Democrat and they were shocked by that. Then I spoke to young white men and they said the same thing. They also said they have no black friends. Is that a common opinion?

I'm against an all-white anything or an all-black anything. I'm a Republican, by the way. I feel there should be blacks in every Party. I believe in most of the things Republicans stand for.

Like what?

I'm against abortion. I'm for prayer in schools. I'm for economic independence. I don't believe in welfare. I think it's a joke. I believe welfare makes you lazy and unproductive. The only thing I don't agree with is the war. I think the war is wrong. I think the President is wrong on this. The main thing I believe in is freedom. I don't think the Republicans say it as much as Democrats, but I think the Democrats say one thing and do another. Most of them are white.

There are a lot of black Democrats in Congress. Clinton appointed a lot of blacks.

Clinton was our number one President. I loved Clinton; not as a Democrat, but as a person.

Did you vote for Clinton?

No I didn't. I'm a Republican. I voted for my party.

So you're a party-line voter?

Not all the time, but that time I did.

How do you feel about the Senate's apology for failing to make lynching a federal crime? The majority of the people who haven't signed on are Republican.

I ripped them apart on my radio show last night. It hurts me and it hurts every Mississippian and makes us look bad. I meet with them quite often and I'll tell them they're wrong. The least they could have done was say, "I'm sorry."

What was your turning point? Why did you become a Republican?

I have nothing against the Democratic Party. When I became mayor, I had to run as an independent because the Democrats wouldn't allow us to run as a Democrat back in those days. But once we broke the Democrats down and took over the seat, I was a national committee member, went to Chicago and took the Party away from the old Democrats. And what did they do? They ran to the Republican Party. So my thinking was, once we got blacks into the Democratic Party, let's do the same in the Republican Party and make damn sure they don't get away with nothin'.

That's why I'm with the Republican Party. I want to make sure we have blacks who will stand up in each Party and that's me. I don't bow to none of 'em and my folks can trust me. I will never sell out to them. I tell them what they gotta do for our folk and that's to make sure we're included; not superior, but equal.

So you're basically working to change the Republican Party from within rather than criticize it from the outside.

I can do more destructive things inside than I can out there throwing rocks. So I'm in the Republican Party for the same reason I was in the Democratic Party: to make sure blacks are included, along with everyone else. It's not like I jumped parties. I feel like both parties are not what they used to be or should be. I'll tell them when they're wrong. I couldn't do that as a Democrat.

I'm on the executive committee of the Mississippi Republican Party and I will tell Senator Lott that he's wrong for not apologizing for something his great grandparents did to us. Their excuse is, well, we didn't have anything to do with it. The hell you didn't. You didn't personally, but your great grandparents did. You should apologize. I have no problem telling them that and I'm a Republican. I pay my dues so they can't kick me out.

What changes have you made within the Republican Party for blacks specifically?

They got a Republican that's not gonna let them run over blacks and get behind closed doors and pass laws that he's not gonna go out and tell people about. They know that.

How do you feel about the state of the national Republican Party today?

I think President Bush is way out of line and I don't think he speaks for all Republicans. He doesn't speak for me.

I read the article you wrote opposing the war in the Jackson Free Press. There weren't many Republicans who broke ranks over the war at that time. There were very few Democrats who publicly opposed the war at that time.

I have a radio talk show on Wednesday night and that was my whole show. I'm opposed to the war. I let the President know. I let all my Senators and Congressmen know. It's wrong to kill. We had no more right to go to the war against Iraq than I have to go to war against you. Iraq did nothing to us. Iraq was not responsible for 9/11.

Sure 9/11 was bad. Sure they killed thousands of us, but how many have we killed of them? How much suffering have we caused them? Two wrongs don't make a right. We are just as wrong -- and I want to be quoted on that -- for going in and destroying innocent people as they were coming over here on 9/11. 9/11 is no comparison to what we've done over there and how we've destroyed the old world with our bombs and how we spread hate and how we took Saddam. I was totally against that. When we took Saddam's sons and showed them all over the world. It's just like they used to do to us black folks. They hung us from trees and let them take pictures of us. Same damn thing.

Did you have any reservations about voting for Bush, especially given your strong opposition to the war?

It bothers me. I feel like he's not telling the truth. How can he sleep knowing that he just got hundreds of people killed or destroyed everyday? He is responsible for them being killed. He's responsible for destroying all of those beautiful buildings. That was the founding of a civilization. He destroyed them. Come on, Mr. President. How can you sleep? I'd ask him that point blank. Why don't you end this war? I pray all the time. "Lord, please, let our president bring this war to an end." The United States Senate is just as guilty as Bush. They went right along with him and gave him billions to continue the war.

Come on; your gas and my gas is two or three dollars a gallon. We got poor folks, white and black, who need boxes of aspirins. I'm a veteran of two wars: World War II and the Korean War and guess what? If I need a box of aspirin today from the VA, I'd go through hell to get it. The veteran who comes home with no legs and no arms is pushed aside and can't get waited on. It's crazy. No one will say the truth. Democrats or Republicans. Reid speaks out once in a while, but they chop him up right away.

When I interview people, I bring up some of these issues, but they don't seem to care. Essentially, the facts don't matter. Do you encounter that?

Oh yeah. My thing is, I don't give a damn what people think about me or what I say. To hell with what anybody thinks about me. White, black or polka dot. I'm against the war. I'm against killing. I've lost two brothers on some stupid murder by some crazy racist.

How do the Republicans respond to you when you raise these issues?

They don't really respond. They ignore me, but I'll keep saying it and they know they got one darkie that ain't gonna change. And that's me.

What do you think about the Republicans who say, "We're so inclusive now. We have Condoleezza Rice and many high-ranking black officials."

Bullshit. That's bullshit. We're not inclusive. The Republican Party is not inclusive. The Republican Party does not reach out. We're fighting for them to do that. I'll admit that President Bush did appoint Condoleezza Rice. He appointed Powell, but that wasn't enough. What about the local Republicans? Did he go around the country and campaign for blacks who were running for office? No. They're not inclusive. The Democrats aren't either. Don't get me wrong. I'm a Republican and I'm gonna stay a Republican because they need somebody like me to stay in the Party and keep hammering away.

You feel like you have your issues and priorities and you want to bring them to the Party. Do you ever get a response?

They won't listen to me. Others feel the same way but won't say it. What are you afraid of? I'd rather be dead and in heaven than afraid to do what I think is right. This war is wrong and I'm not afraid to say it. See the picture of me with Bush? His dad and I were very close. I don't think his father wanted him to go to war. The problem is, the Republican Party hasn't done anything to make this country better and I speak as a Republican. I think they're creating so much division among the country. Any time the country is split 50/50, the leader is wrong. What about the other 50 percent? We need a change. I hope the next president unifies the country.

How did you feel about the 2004 election and all the mudslinging? It was pretty ugly.

First of all, I knew that a Democrat was not going to win. I knew that. You know why? This is a racist country. Anybody who runs for president in this country and comes out as strong as the Democrats were about helping the poor folks and black folks is not going to win. It's that simple. Not in America. Two people will never be President in my lifetime. A woman and a black. They can run Mrs. Clinton if they want to. She'll be beaten. America is still a bigoted country. Mark my words. I guarantee I won't live to see it. I would love to, but it won't happen. I told Colin Powell, don't you be a fool. You want to be embarrassed? Run.

Don't you think a black candidate would get a lot more blacks out to vote?

Yeah, but we can't elect a president. If Democrats want to win, talk them into electing a black man for vice president.

Voter turnout is so low all over the country. How do you encourage blacks to vote?

I usually take Medgar and Martin and say, do you care what they fought for? If you don't vote, you show disrespect for them. That's what I say. I don't know if it does any good or not. The least I can do is show Medgar I still care. And Martin. They all were my friends and we all fought for the same thing. Some of the youngsters say, "My vote doesn't count." If your vote doesn't count, how do you think you got where you are? Somebody voted for you.

I came back the other night from Washington and guess what? A young black man flew me back here. He's a pilot on Delta Airlines. We're flying planes. We couldn't even get on a plane forty years ago. When Megdar was killed, I came back from Chicago and couldn't go inside the airport in Jackson, Mississippi. I had to wait outside for my bag. Now we have blacks flying on Delta. We got blacks running airports. We can't forget that. We gotta keep saying that. That's why I hope reporters like you will say that. Show both sides. The negative and the positive.

Today was a historical thing. Can you imagine? A white judge born in Neshoba county gave another white man 60 years for killing a black and two whites. Can you believe that? They'll say a little bit about it. Then it's all over. Now if you came in here and shot me, oh god, every damn press in the country would be here. White woman shoots black man! NBC. CBS. CNN. All of 'em. You couldn't get rid of 'em, 'cause it involves some nigger.

In terms of the media, a lot conservative radio shows have been talking about Senator Byrd and his beginnings with the KKK. How do you feel about that?

That was the thing to do then. I'm not justifying it, don't get me wrong, but that was the popular thing to do to get what you wanted. In order to get elected, you had to talk about niggers. If you vote for Charles Evers, he goin' take your daughter and marry her. We gotta forgive white people, but never forget.

What other issues are important to you? What have Republicans done well in the past four years?

Have they done anything? Our gasoline is three times what it was a few years ago. Unemployment is about four times what it was a few years ago. Hatred is getting worse for both blacks and whites. The Christians are trying to take over everything. We have a mess going and we need to straighten up our act.

One of the major differences between the Republicans and the Democrats I've met is this: Republicans emphasize personal responsibility. They say, "We don't like social programs. Everyone can pull themselves up by their bootstraps." Democrats say people need help.

I partially agree with that. Partially. Give us a chance to pull ourselves up. I don't like a lot of social programs either because it makes you non-productive. Speaking as a black person, welfare is the worst thing that's ever happened to us. My dad always told us, and I'll never forget this, before I get commodities, I'll kill all of you and then kill myself. I was totally against them giving me commodities like meal, sugar and flour. I always want to be able to work and take care of y'all. That's my job. I don't want you ever asking me about welfare. Welfare makes you dependent upon someone to take care of you. Republicans say, "No, we're not giving you nothin'." I like that. My problem is, don't block me. Republicans say, "Go do it yourself," and I say, "Give me a chance to do it for myself."

That's the main point, right? Go to any poor neighborhood, black or white. You'll find old books, run-down buildings, and teachers who have to buy their own school supplies. So at that point, where's the hope? Especially if someone comes from a broken family that's not emotionally available.

My whole thing is if Bush wants to leave no child behind, then prove it. What you're afraid to do Mr. Bush, is to go to the poorest neighborhoods in all the states and find out what district needs the most. And don't worry about the affluent neighborhood. We need to bring up those communities that need it the most. It ain't gotta be black folks. There are a lot of poor white folks now.

Why is it that people tend to not identify with those basic economic interests? They identify with conservative social issues like gay marriage and abortion, but not issues like education and poverty.

They're not popular issues. We need to take responsibility and educate people. That's why black folks don't like me. I always say it's our responsibility to make safe neighborhoods. It's our job to get them cleaned up.

I notice one of the few Democrats on your wall is Robert F. Kennedy.

I was with Bobby the night he was killed. If any Kennedy ran for president, I'd vote for him. The Kennedy's and the Rockefeller's, before anybody else gave a damn about black folks, they did what they could. I took Bobby Kennedy through the delta and he cried like a baby. He said, I didn't know anybody could live like this. He said he just didn't know any colored folks. We were colored back then. He just didn't know.

After having this conversation with you, it's clear that you're a Republican to change the Party from within, but the media makes you sound like you're a hardcore black loyal Republican from Mississippi.

They don't know a thing about me. I am a black Republican by choice and I do it to make sure the Republicans straighten up.

But that should be included in the story.

They won't do that. Go down to the Republican headquarters. They ain't got a single black working there. Not one. I've been giving them hell about that. I gotta keep hammering away. I'm on the executive committee and I keep repeating, "What about a black? It's getting pretty lonely here with all you white folks. I'm the only darkie here." I can say darkie and I can say nigger. I can say what I want about my own folks. And they look at me real funny. They whisper, "Charles you're right." And I say, "Tell the chairman that."

Sounds like you enjoy the challenge.

I love the life I live. The Lord blessed me to be independent. I am independent.

Rose Aguilar is a San Francisco-based journalist gathering stories from people living in states that voted overwhelmingly for George W. Bush. Track her journey at Stories in America.

Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email


Comments are closed-

sPy
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 22, 2005 3:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, I've been thinking of infiltrating the GOP myself! Just think of all the pranks and dirty tricks one could pull off!! It staggers the imagination. Let's face it, The GOP blazed the trail for this type of thing back in the Nixon era. And Karl Rove has been dutifully carrying the torch (Remember the Swift Boat Veterens for Truth? Rove 101)
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Barbara
Posted by: Barbara on Jul 22, 2005 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm inspired by your attitude and guts !! You have more guts and grit than the majority of the millions of people who live in America.
A person needs to take a stand for what they believe is the right thing to do for ALL people, and not just a few.

And,...by joining the Republican Party, you are able to make a bigger difference than by oposing it.

Heck,...what would happen if everyone joined the Republican Party ? Well,...one thing that would happen is that the USA citizens would reclaim their Government and kick out Bush & his mafia team.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barbara Posted by: Wacre

Comments are closed-

Joining the Republian Party is fun
Posted by: maddogmarley on Jul 22, 2005 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a lifelong anarchist with pernicious libertarian tendencies. I joined the Republican Party in 1999 just for fun, and it is. I love writing to legislators and saying, I'm a Republican and (fill in the blank) sucks. I go down and protest Bush and get called all sorts of names. I tell these creeps I'm a Republican just like them. They don't believe me and I get in shouting matches. I can out-rightwing anybody. One of my favorite things is to remind them that the Bush administration is full of ex-Trots and socialists. The have no idea what I'm talking about. I bring up Bush's big government They have no idea what I'm talking about. I bring up how the GOP has disgraced the names of Teddy Roosevelt, Barry Goldwater, and even the sainted Ronald Reagan. They have no idea what I'm talking about . They don't even know their own party's history.

I find the Dems loathesome and spineless. I mean, who would want to be one of them? The Republicans are organized and actually answer their phones-unlike Dems in Ohio And they aren't afraid to finance and nurtue the party--unlike the Repugs. who of course, are loathesome, too.

While it's 6 of one, half-dozen of the other, I'd love to see Dems, libertarians, anarchists, Greens, whoever, joined the Republican Party en masse and kick these bastards out of office. They're all statists anyway, but the Bushtapo has got to go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

hard to believe
Posted by: diamondvajra on Jul 22, 2005 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Change the "party" from within? Who are you kidding? You know I used to hear that from my mother 40 years ago. It don't work. Anyone who associates with the Republican Party these days and doesn't stand up publicly and denounce them is just as responsible for the criminal behavior of his/her party as Mr. Bush is. I'm sick to death of people who claim that they are republicans but "don't agree" with the "party" line and then, ya know what, check out what happens in Congress, where are your voices there? Having any effect my friends?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hard to believe Posted by: Wacre
» RE: hard to believe Posted by: nardo
» RE: hard to believe Posted by: Wacre
» RE: hard to believe Posted by: LMNOP

Comments are closed-

From the Inside?
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jul 22, 2005 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For fifty years folks have been trying to 'work the inside' to straighten out the GOV.The trouble is BOTH parties flip flop on anything at anytime just to stay current with the social whim. When the Republicans first formed they were staunchly ANTI-CORPORATIONISTS.Why? Because they knew centralizing wealth breeds major problems. Well since they are nothing like the original party,we've got major problems.
Since money is the fuel for both machines,stop supporting them.Don't give to campaigns. Vote for yourself. Truth is
WE are the power,We can control our own affairs,We don't
need anymore well-wallet,double-dealing,greed soaked bigots
as 'leaders'.The time is NOW for the PEOPLE TO LEAD.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: From the Inside? Posted by: Lincoln fan

Comments are closed-

If There Were More Like Him
Posted by: nakis on Jul 22, 2005 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there were more Republicans like Mr Evers then I would not be so angry with them.
I do disagree with him on welfare and abortion but he has a great belief on how America is. America is racist and bigoted. Not as much as before. We're getting better but you don't have to look to hard to see it. I know I will not see a black or woman president in my lifetime and I'm much younger than Mr Evers.
I can't see myself ever becoming a Republican but I can see myself having much more respect for the party if it followed the beliefs of Mr Evers than Mr. Bush.

And as I am fond of saying, it's really not party lines. It's income lines. While you'll be hard pressed to find a democrat that is like Frist or Delay they are far too often not far behind.

I also do have to disagree with the mentallity of voting party lines. The arguement (and anger) expressed by previous posters in regard to those who disagree with their party on key issues yet still vote that party is a very relevant arguement. Knowing the politician is a criminal and voting for that politician is in itself a criminal act. A harsh thing to say but aiding and abeting criminals is a criminal offense. Maybe you don't consider key politicians criminals but they have commited genocide for the sake of money and called it an excersize in freedom. That's criminal. Violating the trust of the American people by lying, giving false evidence, holding back critical information, engaging in unjust wars shouldn't engendar party protection.

History will look back at this time and calls us fools and ---holes for letting these things happen. For not bringing justice for world crimes against humanity. With great power comes great responsibility. Not the neocon axiom, with great power comes great opportunity for greed and more power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Voting along party lines isn't change or freedom
Posted by: kbarker715 on Jul 22, 2005 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a discouraging article! Perhaps it is only discouraging because the blurb below the headline uses the quote about Mr. Evers joining the republicans to cause trouble from within...when this is very much out of the spirit of the whole article. If he were a republican to cause trouble and create change, it seems to me he wouldn't be voting along party lines. To have gone through all he has, to have struggled and fought for justice, to think so much of freedom- and then vote in what you don't believe in..... doesn't sound like an effective startegy to me.
I don't believe any substantive change in this country will come throguh either the republican or democratic parties as they stand. This article shows one reason why.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Charles Evers Lies to Alternet
Posted by: Freedomrider on Jul 22, 2005 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am extremely disappointed in Alternet for publishing this interview. It is indeed unfortunate that neither Ms. Aguilar nor anyone else at Alternet was aware of Mr. Evers long history of political opportunism. For many years he has been a very loyal Republican, never making any attempt to reform his party. He has always been willing to help conservatives justify their racism. To be blunt, he lied in his interview with Ms. Aguilar.

Evers is the go to guy for conservatives. "Charles Evers, Medgar Evers, brother says..." You can fill in the blanks with the latest GOP talking points. Mr. Evers has consistently used his brother's name to give credibility to racist policies in the GOP.

Evers supported the confirmation of judge Charles Pickering.
linked text

When Trent Lott waxed nostalgic for Strom Thurmond's fantasies of Dixiecrat white supremacy Evers supported him. "He was trying to make an old man feel good."
linked text

Worst of all, Mr. Evers may have been an informer for Mississippi's State Sovereignty Commission, America's version of the Stasi.
linked text

" 'I was cooperating with the Sovereignty Commission from the point of negotiation,'
Evers said. "It wasn't that I was going to tell on somebody. It was, 'We're
going to march at eleven o'clock tomorrow, governor, and I want someone there to
protect my people.' He added, 'I guess they're trying to say that I was playing
both sides. Well, I'll play three sides if necessary.... Whatever it took, I
would do that. I had enough of my people lynched; I had enough of the
mistreatment; I had enough of 'em beaten and denied the right just to go and
vote or get a damn drink of water. Whatever I could do on my part, if it meant
kissin' ass, I'd kiss ass.'


I urge you to research Mr. Evers' past comments and his history of support for the right wing and make the necessary corrections to this article.

Thank you very much.

Margaret Kimberley
New York, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Charles Evers is an Uncle Tom? Posted by: Sojourner

Comments are closed-

Envi
Posted by: Envi on Jul 22, 2005 1:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frankly, Mr. Evers should apologize for continuing to vote for a President in whom he has no faith (as should everyone else who voted for Bush). Just what does he think he'll achieve? Very little, it appears to me. This interview was a waste of resources and reveals to me that Mr. Evers is a racist-in-reverse, the ol' "white man holding down the black man" disguise. Hope he stays in the Republican party, 'cause that's exactly where he belongs- with the rest of the liars, cheats and self-aggrandizers. As he said, even his OWN PARTY won't listen to him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

All of the Presidents men
Posted by: pjrsullivan on Jul 22, 2005 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr Evers does a service to us in that he may wake up the Democratic party. The Democrats give so little to a group that has given so much, yet the Republican party gives nothing, and takes away whatever it can.

Coindi Rice travels the world like a thief casing the house of a neighbor, while the elite plan their next "score." If truth be told, the Republicans like to put a black face on their crimes against humanity, it helps deflect from the true perpetrators who are behind the mayhem. Another reason they like to trot out black people in the Republican party is that is hard to find black people that are bad enough to work for their interests, and when they find one, they love to put them out front.

You may recall that Condi Rice was a student of Professor Corbel, the father of the War Criminal "Mad Madeline" Albright. A half million murdered innocent children, "We thought it was worth it."

In the background the cannibal cult kids smirk their way through life with their plans on how to use up the cannon fodder kids, who will need more than an aspirin from the VA when they return home.

Instead of asking which party is better for the people, the real question should be which party is less dangerous!

Clearly the current crop of war criminals are taking us into a completion of their self fulfilling prophecy of "Armeggedon. They would of already taken us there except for acts of "Divine Intervention." Those were the words that Airforce General grant used to describe the events that occurred during the regime of the nuclear war criminal Reagan.

As for all of the presidents men; In the words of Former Governor Jerry Brown, "They're Criminals, They're all criminals! What they don't want you to know is that they have already pulled the nuclear pin on us. A higher level power has intervened and condemned this tyranny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Here's a perfect book for him to read
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 22, 2005 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America He pretty much fits the disfunctional mode but is willing to come clean about it just like the voters in Kansas who Frank talks to admitting their switch from Dem to GOP and giving honest reasons why. I wonder if this guy will switch back to Democrat should a populist Democrat win nomination in 2008 for president. We haven't had a populist Democrat in at least 25 years or we wouldn't be stuck in an Orwellian society already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

maybe we should consider
Posted by: yombdraps on Jul 23, 2005 1:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not using generalizing terms such as "Darkie, Nigger, Dem, Geen, or Repub"no matter if you are black or white, democrat or republican. As well we should consider a country recreated in the 1880's to create profit. We taught our children early in the 1900's to work, and create capitol. Then we lost our money overestamating. To bounce back we fought wars for freedom.
Freedom for what? To exploit the Japanese, Rid the Germans of their hatred, drop bombs on innocent vietnamese to stop the spread of communism? Freedom these days means control. Control of resources and control of media.

Party lines are split these days. I agree lets find someone to unify us. As well let that person teach America how to enjoy life without spending so much, using more than we need, and not to rely irresponsibly on credit. But we must also as it is every American's responsibility, look out financially for others. And don't expect this to come from lowerclass taxpayers. We in America live better than almost every single country in the world. Don't bitch about social programs being obsolete until you can find the people with the hearts to facillitate them. They exist in the form of underpaid teachers.

Republican, or Democrat, War is ignorant, and friendships express emotions beyond wisdom. Sharing is always bennificial. So is compromise. Don't hate our troops, and better yet don't hate at all. This man has a valid point and opinion. Don't disrespect someone for trying to make a difference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered
Posted by: mfinley on Aug 5, 2005 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I made the mistake of reading some of the comments. I wish I had not done this because I want my response to be based on my true feelings and not be influenced by the thoughts of other readers. Well, too late. I read many of them before realizing this was probably a mistake.

I have to agree with one of the comments I read that really said it all. To think one could change the party from the inside is foolhardy. I question how anyone could go to the dark side. Judging from some of Charles' comments about the various times that he speaks up, it appears to me that no one really listens anyway. So, why isn't he working within the party where there is more of a chance that someone may listen?

Charles speaks of not wanting a handout, but wanting equal opportunity so one can work and not need a handout. Well, the party he supports now doesn't want to do either. Charles has limited time left here on this earth. To maximize the most of his time left, would it not be prudent to stick with his party?

Charles pats himself on the back for standing up and telling the Repugs/Neo-Cons "like it is;" however he gives no substantial proof that anyone even raises an eyebrow, at least not in public where the other Repugs/Neo-Cons are present. So, he is able to speak his mind without being excommunicated. Are we to be impressed with this?

I have to give the man his props. He definitely put in his time, in an era where it was dangerous to do so. I agree that he is a brave man for saying unpopular things in the presence of savage wolves.

What I don't give him props on is his choice to belong to the party dominated by such savage wolves. And acknowledging that both parties are not what they need/used to be doesn't excuse his lack of allegiance to the party that, while not the best, has showed the most allegiance to his people.

So, in closing, I'm disheartened by Charles. When I first opened the link, I thought I was in for an experience that would allow me to be wowed and proud. Instead, I see wasted talent and foolish hopes that he will change the party that has been so adamant about not being inclusive. The party that has been so steadfast in attempts to make the American Dream possible only for their own kind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Another Racist
Posted by: indepentent on Aug 5, 2005 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You should be ashamed to show your prejudice to the world!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

sPy
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 22, 2005 3:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, I've been thinking of infiltrating the GOP myself! Just think of all the pranks and dirty tricks one could pull off!! It staggers the imagination. Let's face it, The GOP blazed the trail for this type of thing back in the Nixon era. And Karl Rove has been dutifully carrying the torch (Remember the Swift Boat Veterens for Truth? Rove 101)
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Barbara
Posted by: Barbara on Jul 22, 2005 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm inspired by your attitude and guts !! You have more guts and grit than the majority of the millions of people who live in America.
A person needs to take a stand for what they believe is the right thing to do for ALL people, and not just a few.

And,...by joining the Republican Party, you are able to make a bigger difference than by oposing it.

Heck,...what would happen if everyone joined the Republican Party ? Well,...one thing that would happen is that the USA citizens would reclaim their Government and kick out Bush & his mafia team.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barbara Posted by: Wacre

Comments are closed-

Joining the Republian Party is fun
Posted by: maddogmarley on Jul 22, 2005 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a lifelong anarchist with pernicious libertarian tendencies. I joined the Republican Party in 1999 just for fun, and it is. I love writing to legislators and saying, I'm a Republican and (fill in the blank) sucks. I go down and protest Bush and get called all sorts of names. I tell these creeps I'm a Republican just like them. They don't believe me and I get in shouting matches. I can out-rightwing anybody. One of my favorite things is to remind them that the Bush administration is full of ex-Trots and socialists. The have no idea what I'm talking about. I bring up Bush's big government They have no idea what I'm talking about. I bring up how the GOP has disgraced the names of Teddy Roosevelt, Barry Goldwater, and even the sainted Ronald Reagan. They have no idea what I'm talking about . They don't even know their own party's history.

I find the Dems loathesome and spineless. I mean, who would want to be one of them? The Republicans are organized and actually answer their phones-unlike Dems in Ohio And they aren't afraid to finance and nurtue the party--unlike the Repugs. who of course, are loathesome, too.

While it's 6 of one, half-dozen of the other, I'd love to see Dems, libertarians, anarchists, Greens, whoever, joined the Republican Party en masse and kick these bastards out of office. They're all statists anyway, but the Bushtapo has got to go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

hard to believe
Posted by: diamondvajra on Jul 22, 2005 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Change the "party" from within? Who are you kidding? You know I used to hear that from my mother 40 years ago. It don't work. Anyone who associates with the Republican Party these days and doesn't stand up publicly and denounce them is just as responsible for the criminal behavior of his/her party as Mr. Bush is. I'm sick to death of people who claim that they are republicans but "don't agree" with the "party" line and then, ya know what, check out what happens in Congress, where are your voices there? Having any effect my friends?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hard to believe Posted by: Wacre
» RE: hard to believe Posted by: nardo
» RE: hard to believe Posted by: Wacre
» RE: hard to believe Posted by: LMNOP

Comments are closed-

From the Inside?
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jul 22, 2005 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For fifty years folks have been trying to 'work the inside' to straighten out the GOV.The trouble is BOTH parties flip flop on anything at anytime just to stay current with the social whim. When the Republicans first formed they were staunchly ANTI-CORPORATIONISTS.Why? Because they knew centralizing wealth breeds major problems. Well since they are nothing like the original party,we've got major problems.
Since money is the fuel for both machines,stop supporting them.Don't give to campaigns. Vote for yourself. Truth is
WE are the power,We can control our own affairs,We don't
need anymore well-wallet,double-dealing,greed soaked bigots
as 'leaders'.The time is NOW for the PEOPLE TO LEAD.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: From the Inside? Posted by: Lincoln fan

Comments are closed-

If There Were More Like Him
Posted by: nakis on Jul 22, 2005 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there were more Republicans like Mr Evers then I would not be so angry with them.
I do disagree with him on welfare and abortion but he has a great belief on how America is. America is racist and bigoted. Not as much as before. We're getting better but you don't have to look to hard to see it. I know I will not see a black or woman president in my lifetime and I'm much younger than Mr Evers.
I can't see myself ever becoming a Republican but I can see myself having much more respect for the party if it followed the beliefs of Mr Evers than Mr. Bush.

And as I am fond of saying, it's really not party lines. It's income lines. While you'll be hard pressed to find a democrat that is like Frist or Delay they are far too often not far behind.

I also do have to disagree with the mentallity of voting party lines. The arguement (and anger) expressed by previous posters in regard to those who disagree with their party on key issues yet still vote that party is a very relevant arguement. Knowing the politician is a criminal and voting for that politician is in itself a criminal act. A harsh thing to say but aiding and abeting criminals is a criminal offense. Maybe you don't consider key politicians criminals but they have commited genocide for the sake of money and called it an excersize in freedom. That's criminal. Violating the trust of the American people by lying, giving false evidence, holding back critical information, engaging in unjust wars shouldn't engendar party protection.

History will look back at this time and calls us fools and ---holes for letting these things happen. For not bringing justice for world crimes against humanity. With great power comes great responsibility. Not the neocon axiom, with great power comes great opportunity for greed and more power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Voting along party lines isn't change or freedom
Posted by: kbarker715 on Jul 22, 2005 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a discouraging article! Perhaps it is only discouraging because the blurb below the headline uses the quote about Mr. Evers joining the republicans to cause trouble from within...when this is very much out of the spirit of the whole article. If he were a republican to cause trouble and create change, it seems to me he wouldn't be voting along party lines. To have gone through all he has, to have struggled and fought for justice, to think so much of freedom- and then vote in what you don't believe in..... doesn't sound like an effective startegy to me.
I don't believe any substantive change in this country will come throguh either the republican or democratic parties as they stand. This article shows one reason why.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Charles Evers Lies to Alternet
Posted by: Freedomrider on Jul 22, 2005 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am extremely disappointed in Alternet for publishing this interview. It is indeed unfortunate that neither Ms. Aguilar nor anyone else at Alternet was aware of Mr. Evers long history of political opportunism. For many years he has been a very loyal Republican, never making any attempt to reform his party. He has always been willing to help conservatives justify their racism. To be blunt, he lied in his interview with Ms. Aguilar.

Evers is the go to guy for conservatives. "Charles Evers, Medgar Evers, brother says..." You can fill in the blanks with the latest GOP talking points. Mr. Evers has consistently used his brother's name to give credibility to racist policies in the GOP.

Evers supported the confirmation of judge Charles Pickering.
linked text

When Trent Lott waxed nostalgic for Strom Thurmond's fantasies of Dixiecrat white supremacy Evers supported him. "He was trying to make an old man feel good."
linked text

Worst of all, Mr. Evers may have been an informer for Mississippi's State Sovereignty Commission, America's version of the Stasi.
linked text

" 'I was cooperating with the Sovereignty Commission from the point of negotiation,'
Evers said. "It wasn't that I was going to tell on somebody. It was, 'We're
going to march at eleven o'clock tomorrow, governor, and I want someone there to
protect my people.' He added, 'I guess they're trying to say that I was playing
both sides. Well, I'll play three sides if necessary.... Whatever it took, I
would do that. I had enough of my people lynched; I had enough of the
mistreatment; I had enough of 'em beaten and denied the right just to go and
vote or get a damn drink of water. Whatever I could do on my part, if it meant
kissin' ass, I'd kiss ass.'


I urge you to research Mr. Evers' past comments and his history of support for the right wing and make the necessary corrections to this article.

Thank you very much.

Margaret Kimberley
New York, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Charles Evers is an Uncle Tom? Posted by: Sojourner

Comments are closed-

Envi
Posted by: Envi on Jul 22, 2005 1:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frankly, Mr. Evers should apologize for continuing to vote for a President in whom he has no faith (as should everyone else who voted for Bush). Just what does he think he'll achieve? Very little, it appears to me. This interview was a waste of resources and reveals to me that Mr. Evers is a racist-in-reverse, the ol' "white man holding down the black man" disguise. Hope he stays in the Republican party, 'cause that's exactly where he belongs- with the rest of the liars, cheats and self-aggrandizers. As he said, even his OWN PARTY won't listen to him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

All of the Presidents men
Posted by: pjrsullivan on Jul 22, 2005 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr Evers does a service to us in that he may wake up the Democratic party. The Democrats give so little to a group that has given so much, yet the Republican party gives nothing, and takes away whatever it can.

Coindi Rice travels the world like a thief casing the house of a neighbor, while the elite plan their next "score." If truth be told, the Republicans like to put a black face on their crimes against humanity, it helps deflect from the true perpetrators who are behind the mayhem. Another reason they like to trot out black people in the Republican party is that is hard to find black people that are bad enough to work for their interests, and when they find one, they love to put them out front.

You may recall that Condi Rice was a student of Professor Corbel, the father of the War Criminal "Mad Madeline" Albright. A half million murdered innocent children, "We thought it was worth it."

In the background the cannibal cult kids smirk their way through life with their plans on how to use up the cannon fodder kids, who will need more than an aspirin from the VA when they return home.

Instead of asking which party is better for the people, the real question should be which party is less dangerous!

Clearly the current crop of war criminals are taking us into a completion of their self fulfilling prophecy of "Armeggedon. They would of already taken us there except for acts of "Divine Intervention." Those were the words that Airforce General grant used to describe the events that occurred during the regime of the nuclear war criminal Reagan.

As for all of the presidents men; In the words of Former Governor Jerry Brown, "They're Criminals, They're all criminals! What they don't want you to know is that they have already pulled the nuclear pin on us. A higher level power has intervened and condemned this tyranny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Here's a perfect book for him to read
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 22, 2005 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America He pretty much fits the disfunctional mode but is willing to come clean about it just like the voters in Kansas who Frank talks to admitting their switch from Dem to GOP and giving honest reasons why. I wonder if this guy will switch back to Democrat should a populist Democrat win nomination in 2008 for president. We haven't had a populist Democrat in at least 25 years or we wouldn't be stuck in an Orwellian society already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

maybe we should consider
Posted by: yombdraps on Jul 23, 2005 1:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not using generalizing terms such as "Darkie, Nigger, Dem, Geen, or Repub"no matter if you are black or white, democrat or republican. As well we should consider a country recreated in the 1880's to create profit. We taught our children early in the 1900's to work, and create capitol. Then we lost our money overestamating. To bounce back we fought wars for freedom.
Freedom for what? To exploit the Japanese, Rid the Germans of their hatred, drop bombs on innocent vietnamese to stop the spread of communism? Freedom these days means control. Control of resources and control of media.

Party lines are split these days. I agree lets find someone to unify us. As well let that person teach America how to enjoy life without spending so much, using more than we need, and not to rely irresponsibly on credit. But we must also as it is every American's responsibility, look out financially for others. And don't expect this to come from lowerclass taxpayers. We in America live better than almost every single country in the world. Don't bitch about social programs being obsolete until you can find the people with the hearts to facillitate them. They exist in the form of underpaid teachers.

Republican, or Democrat, War is ignorant, and friendships express emotions beyond wisdom. Sharing is always bennificial. So is compromise. Don't hate our troops, and better yet don't hate at all. This man has a valid point and opinion. Don't disrespect someone for trying to make a difference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered
Posted by: mfinley on Aug 5, 2005 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I made the mistake of reading some of the comments. I wish I had not done this because I want my response to be based on my true feelings and not be influenced by the thoughts of other readers. Well, too late. I read many of them before realizing this was probably a mistake.

I have to agree with one of the comments I read that really said it all. To think one could change the party from the inside is foolhardy. I question how anyone could go to the dark side. Judging from some of Charles' comments about the various times that he speaks up, it appears to me that no one really listens anyway. So, why isn't he working within the party where there is more of a chance that someone may listen?

Charles speaks of not wanting a handout, but wanting equal opportunity so one can work and not need a handout. Well, the party he supports now doesn't want to do either. Charles has limited time left here on this earth. To maximize the most of his time left, would it not be prudent to stick with his party?

Charles pats himself on the back for standing up and telling the Repugs/Neo-Cons "like it is;" however he gives no substantial proof that anyone even raises an eyebrow, at least not in public where the other Repugs/Neo-Cons are present. So, he is able to speak his mind without being excommunicated. Are we to be impressed with this?

I have to give the man his props. He definitely put in his time, in an era where it was dangerous to do so. I agree that he is a brave man for saying unpopular things in the presence of savage wolves.

What I don't give him props on is his choice to belong to the party dominated by such savage wolves. And acknowledging that both parties are not what they need/used to be doesn't excuse his lack of allegiance to the party that, while not the best, has showed the most allegiance to his people.

So, in closing, I'm disheartened by Charles. When I first opened the link, I thought I was in for an experience that would allow me to be wowed and proud. Instead, I see wasted talent and foolish hopes that he will change the party that has been so adamant about not being inclusive. The party that has been so steadfast in attempts to make the American Dream possible only for their own kind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Another Racist
Posted by: indepentent on Aug 5, 2005 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You should be ashamed to show your prejudice to the world!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS