Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

No Room for Moderate Republicans?

By Rose Aguilar, AlterNet. Posted July 19, 2005.


As liberal and conservative groups and pundits debate the future of the Supreme Court, a large but often overlooked group is being left out of the conversation: moderate Republicans.
Advertisement

"It is mind-boggling to me that the press only focuses on right-wingers. Is it just because sensationalism sells?" asks Ann Stone, national chair of Republicans for Choice, a DC-based group that supports pro-choice Republican candidates. "When moderates try to do something, it might get attention on NPR or in the Los Angeles Times, but the press here in Washington is pretty much ignoring moderates."

She's right. By reading news coverage of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's retirement, you wouldn't even know that moderate Republicans exist. A July 12 opinion piece in USA Today reads: "Now as Bush considers how he will fill the first Supreme Court vacancy to occur on his watch, he is under pressure from conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats to name someone to their liking." According to a July 13 Voice of America article: "Special interest groups on both ends of the political spectrum have been mobilizing for a Supreme Court confirmation fight for years." And a July 15 story in Human Events, a conservative weekly, says, "All told, liberal and conservative special interests could spend upwards of $50 million by the time a nominee is confirmed by the Senate."

Why aren't moderate groups -- of which there are many -- receiving as much attention as groups like People for the American Way, the Christian Coalition or Planned Parenthood?

"We are not spending our time doing a lot of loud screaming on the outside," says Stone. "Instead, we're working directly with the senators who will be swing votes."

Republicans for Choice, a group with 150,000 members in all 50 states, is lobbying moderate Republicans to fight for a "moderate, thoughtful" Supreme Court justice who will "uphold a woman's right to choose."

Stone says that so far the female candidates mentioned to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor are "horrible," while three of the male candidates, including Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, are "close to acceptable; [Gonzales is] the only one that is remotely pro-choice," she says. "We're not even sure that he's 100 percent pro-choice, but he's been moderate in his decisions." As far as the other two candidates go, Stone is "afraid to give their names because that would ensure they would not get nominated, especially after the smear campaign against Gonzalez from the right."

If Bush names a justice who is in favor of outlawing abortion, Stone believes moderates will leave the party in droves. "People are becoming very upset," she says. "A lot of the people who have already left the party are only giving money to us."

The next Supreme Court Justice's opinion on Roe v. Wade is also the main concern for Republican Majority for Choice (RMC), a moderate Republican group that endorses the "big tent" philosophy of inclusion and tolerance on social issues. "This is the most important decision that has ever been made for this organization," says Kellie Ferguson, RMC Executive Director. "We've done polling after polling that shows the majority of Republicans support women making decisions, not the government."

For now, the RMC is spending its resources on a judicial task force of attorneys who have been researching potential Supreme Court nominees and sharing their findings with moderate Republican senators. "Spending a lot of money up front is a waste," says Ferguson. "This vote is with the Senators and we need to focus our attention on targeting them."

Ferguson says four to five Republican Senators are close to 100 percent pro-choice; another handful support family planning. "We believe members who are not pro-choice will be hesitant to confirm a conservative nominee because there are so many ramifications involved."

RMC works with Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America on legislative issues, but they part ways when it comes to endorsing specific candidates. RMC is working on a game plan if the President decides to nominate a justice who is similar to Clarence Thomas or Antonin Scalia.


Digg!

Rose Aguilar is a San Francisco-based journalist gathering stories from people living in states that voted overwhelmingly for George W. Bush. Track her journey at Stories in America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"Moderate"
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 19, 2005 2:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Moderate republicans? You mean some have survived???? Well yeah, seriously, we all know a moderate republican or two, don't we? In fact, most registered republicans define themselves as "moderate". The problem is their party has been taken over by kooks, criminals and incompetents. Not to mention morons. These are the professional republicans I'm talking about. Think about it! Look at how many of these people can only be described as stupid - starting with the Half-Wit in Chief. This is no longer the party of Abraham Lincoln or Teddy Roosevelt. Hell, it's not even the party of Richard Nixon anymore! Today Tricky Dick couldn't even get the republican nomination. Isn't it strange how people like Nixon and Barry Goldwater, staunch right wingers in their day, look moderate in hindsight?
My advise to any "young republican" I meet is always: "Take your party back"!
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Moderate" Posted by: Samantha Vimes
CONSERVATVE DOES NOT EQUAL REPUBLICAN
Posted by: LMNOP on Jul 19, 2005 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you call yourself a moderate conservative, we can talk. If you use the word Republican in any way to describe yourself, then you are my enemy and the enemy of my country. You are like a moderate Nazi or a moderate Klansman. Or a moderate strain of the AIDS virus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey Give Them a Chance
Posted by: expat in tokyo on Jul 19, 2005 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok I am as hard left as they come, to be perfectly frank. But I also realize without cultivating those who are Conservative (fiscally and socially) we will never win back the mainstream of america!! If folks like the last 2 posters are the norm then I dont know what to make of my party anymore. We need to embrace those who may disagree with us on one or two points but love freedom and the ability to discuss topics without resorting to terms like "nazi" and "communist".

Once upon a time there was a dream called America, and that dream brought together those from all folds of the political realm. But now that dream has been stolen from us by those who minipulate the media and make us into "blue states" and "red states". If we are ever to see that dream again we must rise above this nightmare and work together to bring forth real change. Until then.. Divide and conquer will be the status quo.. As Lincoln (and the Bible) once said... A House Dived Will Not Stand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey Give Them a Chance Posted by: LaVieja
What is a Moderate Republican?
Posted by: iana_gheddis420 on Jul 19, 2005 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no such thing. A true republican would recognise that they won the last few elections and would flush the socialists down the drain one bill at a time. Instead, we have senators who call themselves republicans, but they take the losses of the democrats personally. They go RINO and the press does lap it up. Look at McCain and Voinovich. Voinovich had more press in one day when he cried about Bolton (You tell me, who is the REAL man--different topic) than he has had the rest of his lackluster career.
Like most articles on AlterNet, this one is about nothing. Might as well be about crop circles in Mali!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What is a Moderate Republican? Posted by: iana_gheddis420
» RE: What is a Moderate Republican? Posted by: turbocrusher
Well, finally, someone is talking about us out here that still vote!
Posted by: Pepper on Jul 19, 2005 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As you can see from my posting here, I am not a liberal nor am I a conservative in the current sense of the word. I am fiscal conservative (balanced budgets, real trade, low taxation with true investment in National infrastructure and a safety net for those temporarily in trouble) but a social and political liberal in that we have an obligation as "humans" to assist those in need especially if its a "hand up" and not a "hand out".

I have been alienated from my party and the dems are weak and indecisive with no courage with the exception of Henry Reid of Nevada. He is the only dem I could vote for in a pinch, but none of the others. Howard Dean was close and I probably would have voted for him. But Kerry was again, wishy washy with political "let me say what you want to hear" kind of campain.

I hate the neocons more than the liberals which is going a long way and am now more along those lines than the current administration. I just hope we can come together as a group because it sure is getting lonely out here. LOL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Centrist Posted by: AdamSelene40
» Oh, Shut Up and Just Do It. Posted by: oakgroveinn
again "moderate"
Posted by: diamondvajra on Jul 19, 2005 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, you better drop all your "quietest" tactics and hit the streets cause we can see how "effective" you have been so far. You are a fool if you think that you can turn the republican party away from the course plotted out for it. They have taken the blood and are in a frenzy. And you can wring your hands and worry but the bottom line is, this administration is driven by secrecy, fear and greed and the sooner you "moderates" realize it the better...good luck

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pro-Choice Republicans...
Posted by: izzie on Jul 19, 2005 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting. I had no idea there were so many large pro-choice Republican groups. Yet another reason why the Dems should not back off on the abortion issue.
The author is right. I _never_ hear from moderates in the news. Problem is, they don't have a backbone and would probably never put up a fight like the left tries to do with conservative Democrats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pro-Choice Republicans... Posted by: iana_gheddis420
» RE: Pro-Choice Republicans... Posted by: AdamSelene40
Today's the Day!
Posted by: iana_gheddis420 on Jul 19, 2005 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great chance that Bush will nominate a new judge today. Since he had a plan in place for months, if not years, I laugh when i see all the libs and the press trying to make it look as though he actually consulted with them. He didn't. It probably makes him physically ill to be in the presence of decidedly unmanly, wisps like Reid and Durban.
I am rooting for Janice Rogers Brown. She is a true intellectual who believes that the individual should be more powerful than the state.
I know that liberals hate her and all conservative judges. But who sided with the sick in Raich v ashcroft/Gonzales (medical marijuana)? Conservatives, members of the court who strictly interpret the constitution. It is always the moderates who give away your liberties for a shot at a page one photo in the New york Times. Who sided with homeowners recently in what turned out to be the worst ruling in supreme court history? Conservatives.
I hope that AlterNet readers will think a little before responding. Our country hasn't been 'free' since the great depression. Look at our history prior to that. We had a great lifestyle packed with freedom and wealth (one does not come without the other). Remember the flappers? It was after the New Deal that life got complicated. It was government intervention since the turn of the century that screwed up the economy.
I can't wait to see the insipid, venomous, unreasoned responses to this one! It makes being a conservative fun. yipee!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Today's the Day! Posted by: Shehova
» RE: Today's the Day! Posted by: iana_gheddis420
» RE: Today's the Day! Posted by: Shehova
» RE: Today's the Day! Posted by: Truffle
Welcome, Moderate Republicans
Posted by: thirdmg on Jul 19, 2005 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What goes unnoticed too often is that today's Republican Party is no longer the party of Lincoln. It's now the party of George Wallace and the South. After Nixon, through his southern strategy, lured Wallace's disaffected Democrats into the Republican Party, they gained dominance by steadily driving out the moderates and transforming the party into a resemblance of what the Democratic Party was during the era of segregation.

Although I've been a Democrat and a liberal all of my adult life, I come from a Republican family and I've known a lot of moderate Republicans. They are reasonable and rational people. It's not only possible to work with them, it's now an absolute necessity if we're ever going to free this country from the right-wing lunatic fringe.

My only concern about moderate Republicans is that they too often remain loyal to their party even when that loyalty becomes indefensible and misguided. If they ever remove their loyalty in large numbers, the radical right will fall.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Welcome, Moderate Republicans Posted by: turbocrusher
The Democrats Are the Moderate Republicans
Posted by: birdman on Jul 19, 2005 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just to clear things up, so everyone can enter the correct door ...

The Democratic Party (at official levels -- not talking about street level here) is now what used to be the Republican Party, most of which was made up of what we now call "moderate" Republicans.

The Republican Party is now actually the American Nazi Party. Remember, most of what the official Republicans state as their world view is almost exactly what Hitler stated, right down to the Christian nation stuff.

Old line Democrats are either on the sidelines or are hanging out at the Green Party buffet, checking things out.

The Green Party, in the meantime is ... well, poverty-stricken for openers. Which means that unless they use the Republican strategy of taking over the cheap seats (city council, school board, that sort of thing) for the next half-century, they're not going to get anywhere in the current money-driven politics.

However, when the U.S. economy finally tanks spectacularly -- as it must, being built on sand, including the sands of Arabia -- perhaps there won't be enough money left to rule politics, and a new politics can emerge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Greens Posted by: AdamSelene40
How other's feel
Posted by: cyclone on Jul 19, 2005 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now maybe some can understand the way that another group of us feel, the "Liberal/Democrat Christians." There is no voice for us, we are merely tossed into the same group as the right wing zealots. It is not Christianity we should be fighting, but the use of Christianity to champion a right wing "eye for an eye" or, "you'll burn in hell" point of view.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How other's feel Posted by: windy
» RE: How other's feel Posted by: cyclone
» RE: How other's feel Posted by: LaVieja
Gonzales -- Be Still My Heart!
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Jul 19, 2005 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh goody! I can't wait to see how this one works out !

There's a Republicans for Choice organization ... and boo - hoo ... that awful left wing media bias doesn't give them a fair shake at soliciting contributions from moderates of good will ....

And who's their idea of a Moderate justice? Gonzales, maybe ... or some other pro-business, anti-regulation, personal friend of the President to be named at a future date ...

Just send the money now!

Hey, if it draws funding away from other Republican fund raising promotions --

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gonzales -- Be Still My Heart! Posted by: iana_gheddis420
They're corporate Republicans for god's sake
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 19, 2005 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and they're part of the reason conservatives in the Republican Party took over the party just like it happened in Kansas, Florida, Texas, Virginia, etc ... They're socially moderate but economically conservative in the corporate sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"moderate"?
Posted by: Professor Progressive on Jul 19, 2005 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It strikes me that if so-called moderate Republicans can't take over their own party, maybe they should make common cause with the Democratic Leadership Council and form a party that would be the equivalent of the Liberal Party in Canada. Then, maybe the Democratic wing of the Democratic party (the Canadian NDP) would be able to have coherent positions on issues, and just maybe the two parties could make Texas and Utah the American equivalent of Alberta.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Moderate Republicans
Posted by: drmeow on Jul 19, 2005 2:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few points:

I would like to eliminate “Republican” and “Democrat” completely and substitute a little truth in advertising. If I’m going to be called a communist or a socialist (both words I’m proud to be called - FDR was quite the socialist - but that have become insults and "evil" in the US), then I want the iana_gheddis420’ of this world to be called the fascists that they are. Instead of adjectives attached to inaccurate labels, let's adopt more accurate labels: reactionary conservative, moderate conservative, moderate, moderate progressive, radical progressive. Since they don't fit any of those groups, I guess that would make the current administration oligarchists.

A third party will be largely ineffective as long as we continue to have our “winner take all” system. Don’t scoff at the “Republican strategy of taking over the cheap seats (city council, school board, that sort of thing)” - it can make a difference. Since the majority of Americans tend to be moderate in much the same vein as Pepper (i.e., I don’t want my taxes to be any higher than they have to be but I do want to protect my country in the form of the infrastructure, education, and a safety net and I want the government to keep out of my personal life), it wouldn’t take as long for saner voices to take over the local governments and, from there, the state and national ones, as it took the pseudo-conservatives who currently dominate politics.

Don’t blame the lack of media coverage of the moderates on their not having a backbone - remember that the current US media is controlled by the oligarchists and the historic curtain between the owners and the editorial staff has not existed for years (i.e., you WILL NOT publish anything the owners disagree with). It is not in their best interest to give a voice to any moderates unless they can also denigrate them or make them look like fools or problems. Besides, screaming and yelling and making a stink in the media won’t help if laws are quietly being passed that will destroy us. The reality is that we have a corrupt, money-driven political system and sometimes it takes quietly going to individual members of Congress and threatening them with the loss of money and, with it, power to save our butts in the short run so that we can be around here and free long enough to save our butts for the long term.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Moderate Republicans Posted by: izzie
» RE: Moderate Republicans Posted by: maxpayne
What Are We Talking About Here?
Posted by: iana_gheddis420 on Jul 19, 2005 2:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you scroll back and look at this site, it is a bunch of liberals talking about how to fix the GOP. Unbelievable! Can a party that has lost consistantly for 11 years afford this?
In 2006, you (liberals) stand a good chance of losing Sarbanes, You are probably losing, Feinstein, Jeffords, and Byrd. You May lose Kohl, Akaka, Bill Nelson, Cantwell, Carper, Lautenberg, Snowe (wears an “R”, but dems will suffer more in her absence), And you may lose Ben Nelson, Lieberman (the sane one), Stabenow, Levin, Inouye, Mikulski, Kennedy, Clinton, Corzine (for NJ Gov), and Bingaman. Most due to age, the other to being ripe targets.
And you are doing exactly what the GOP needs you to do. Sit here and critique the winners while being very careful to not note what led to their massive sucess.
Now I can sleep soundly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here is why.
Posted by: Edward George on Jul 19, 2005 3:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you were in a quiet conversation and two people came in berating each other at the top of their lungs your conversation would cease. That's pretty simple.

A better question is what to do about it. The internet is serving much of that purpose but real people are still not really getting together and conversing. They are afraid of their neighbors because they don't know them. They are even afraid to use their real names on the internet. "Houswives" (they could just as well be house husbands) aren't having coffee clatches during the day because nobody's home. Two incomes are necessary to support the modern life style. No coffee clatches, no block parties. We Americans are working hundreds of hours more per year than any other "first world" country, corporations don't have to hire more people and are socking away enormous surpluses. We eager beavers build bigger and bigger beaver lodges, don't have time to enjoy them and don't have time to think about how stupid we are. Anybody want to describe what they are doing to outwit the glories of capitalism's heaven?

Ed George

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No longer accept the term Christian
Posted by: nardo on Jul 19, 2005 4:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although I believe and follow the teachings of Christ. Because of how the term Christian has been sullied, muddied, and demoralized, I now just refer to myself as a Child Of God, The term Christian leaves a bad taste in a lot of mouths (including my own) due to the christian coalition "selling salvation" and convincing People to follow them and their beliefs instead of The Fathers instructions outlined in the word of God.

They have become so power hungry, that they've devised a scheme to take over this country using Politics,Religion and Money, and who has more money that Republicans.

The "con" is on, and the inducted are many, so It's not a Party that is in Default, but a People.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Forget moderate Republicans and Democrats, we need real moderates
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 20, 2005 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's simple
Posted by: apodapa on Jul 23, 2005 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All Republicans suck. Most Democrats blow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]