Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Stonewalled at the White House

By David Corn, DavidCorn.com. Posted July 12, 2005.


On the verge of massive political damage, Monday's White House briefing with the press was one big 'no comment' for spokesman Scott McCllelan.
Advertisement

I advise all students of political speech to read the transcript of the press briefing conducted by White House press secretary Scott McClellan on Monday. It was a smorgasbord of stonewalling. He entered the White House press room at 1:00 p.m., his eyes darting about, and started off by reading a statement from President Bush on the tenth anniversary of the massacre at Srebrenica.

Then the subject changed. Rather abruptly. Reporter after reporter asked McClellan about Karl Rove and the news -- broken by Michael Isikoff of Newsweek -- of a July 11, 2003 email written by Time's Matt Cooper that noted that Cooper had spoken to Rove on "double super secret background" and that Rove had told him that former Ambassador Joseph Wilson's "wife… apparently works at the agency on wmd issues." The email is proof that Rove leaked to a reporter information revealing the CIA employment of Valerie Plame (a.k.a. Valerie Wilson).

This puts Rove and the White House in a pickle. Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, says that Rove did not mention Valerie Wilson's name to Cooper. But this is a rather thin defense. (I explain why here, and I also note why George W. Bush, if he takes his own rhetoric seriously, has no choice but to dismiss Rove.) But legal and criminal difficulties aside, the email is undeniable evidence that Rove leaked national security information to a journalist to discredit a critic (Joseph Wilson). How does that square with White House policy as it has been previously stated? Well, it doesn't. And the journalists in the White House press room knew that. Many had a list of previous McClellan statements at the ready. I was there, and I had a list, too. Here are some of the past White House statements I had collected.

On September 29, 2003, Scott McClellan said of the leak (which first appeared in a Bob Novak column on July 14, 2003):

That is not the way this White House operates. The president expects everyone in his administration to adhere to the highest standards of conduct. No would be authorized to do such a thing.

Asked then about the allegation Rove had been involved in the leak, he said,

Well, I've made it very clear that it was a ridiculous suggestion…. It is simply not true…. And I have spoken with Karl Rove.

He also said that the White House would not stand for such conduct:

If anyone in this administration was involved in [the leak], they would no longer be in this administration.

On October 1, 2003, McClellan reiterated the White House position:

The president certainly doesn't condone the leaking.

And he said of Rove:

I made it very clear that he didn't condone that kind of activity and was not involved in that kind of activity.

On October 7, McClellan noted that prior to previously telling the press that Rove and two other White House aides -- National Security Council staffer Elliott Abrams and Dick Cheney's chief of staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby -- were not involved in the leak, he had spoken to each of the three and determined they had not been part of the Plame/CIA leak:

I had no doubt of that…but I like to check my information to make sure it's accurate before I report back to you, and that's exactly what I did.

How could McClellan defend such a record? His strategy was clear: don't even try. When the reporters began firing Rove-related queries at him, he refused to answer any of them. The first query came from Terrence Hunt of Associated Press: Does Bush stand by his pledge to fire anyone involved in the Plame/CIA leak? McClellan replied that "while the [leak] investigation is ongoing, the White House is not going to comment on it." Hunt tried again: "Excuse me, but I wasn't actually talking about any investigation. But in June 2004, the president said that he would fire anybody who was involved in this leak…. And I just wanted to know, is that still his position."


Digg!

David Corn is the Washington editor of The Nation and author of "The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception." He writes a blog at davidcorn.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
PRESS FILLIBUSTER Strategy
Posted by: plunger on Jul 12, 2005 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yesterday morning I sent this to the Key White House Journalists and others:

"We need your help. It's time to be a journalist again.
If ALL of you do your jobs, Rove and these thugs can no longer intimidate you.

Please focus on the NEWS. DARE to ask the toughest questions, and for
God's sake, FOLLOW UP with a question that actually gets to the ANSWERS.

America needs you.

Thank you."

Today, it's time for a new message...

The key White House Reporters obviously engaged in a bit of a conspiracy of their own yesterday (finally) to take these bastards on in numbers rather than individually. The tide has turned.

Obviously McClellan has made it known that he will stonewall the media on any questions pertaining to Rove. Today I sent out out more e-mails suggesting the following of these reporters:

"THANK YOU from all patriotic Americans, THANK YOU for holding McClellan's feet to the fire and making him personally accountable to the people of this country, for whom he works.

Next step:

As this administration has obviously CONSPIRED to prevent you from learning the truth, it's time to counter these tactics with a conspiracy of your own. If ALL OF YOU collectively refuse to ask any question other than those pertaining to Rove's Treason, The White House Press Briefings will themselves become an indictment of this administration. McClellan lied right to your faces, repeatedly, and now he doesn't want to talk about it?

Consider this strategy to be a Press Fillibuster - for as many days as it takes - until McClellan or the President himself ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS. Let's see how the opinion polls deal with a few days of "No Comment" from the President's spokesperson, or the President himself.

There are NO OTHER TOPICS to ask questions on until these questions are ANSWERED (unless of course they want to switch the subject to who was actually behind 9/11 and what Dick Cheney and NORAD were really up to on that morning)."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Super Smears On The Way
Posted by: Riverside on Jul 12, 2005 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look for a variety of extreme smear tactics against Wilson and many others to distract the press and the public from the real issue. As this campaign grows there are going to be some serious counter-attacks. The biggest thing will be that there are Democrats snuggled in on PlameGate and that has been a key reason for reticence by that other party.

Bottom line, what was done to Valery Plame as an undercover agent is an extreme dishonor to many brave people. most of whom we will never know, who fight hard for all of us. This was not just the usual political dirty business, this was a potential death sentence. We must not forget that.

We, regardless of our political party, must not allow our nation to be run this way. We have differences, but I would hope we agree on the basic principles that are the core of these United States. We are "we the people", aren't we? Let's start to act like it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Take that, Liberal Media!
Posted by: nanobubble on Jul 12, 2005 12:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's about time someone finally stood up to that god-forsaken 'liberal media'. It only took a treasonous act of exposing undercover CIA Agents by the White House, and McCllelan has done a good job at participating in the cover-up and stonewalling of questions to those pithy Fox News and NBC liberal journalists.

Shame on them for asking!

Culture of life - god bless america.
Vote for war and lock your door.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Back to Work
Posted by: Kajamian on Jul 12, 2005 4:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David, thank you! Not only for your questions and comments, but thank you for doing the reprint and naming names of the reporters asking the questions.

It seems like the transcripts used to give the reporter's name or at least the affiliation. Now all we get is "Q" and sometimes Scott will mention a name in his response.

I like the suggestions by plunder to start sending notes of encouragement to individual reporters. It's got to feel good knowing people are paying attention to what you're doing. Especially if it's positive.

I have a suggestion if Scott really starts spouting the party line for every question. I'm assuming he can't just walk out because you'd report it! But since there's only 3-5 responses he's using for the questions on Rove, everybody start chanting his responses along with him. Very quietly of course.

In fact, that's not a bad idea for this administration as a whole. How many more times are we going to be fed "up or down vote" in the next few weeks? I'd enjoy hearing Bill Frist trying to make one of his usual sonorous speeches while the audience softly chanted "up or down vote! up or down vote!" Hey! Maybe we could try it in harmony and start a music craze to replace "doo wap"

Seriously, I have little faith in Bush firing Karl Rove. He'll tender his resignation and Bush will refuse it -- a la Rumsfeld. Rove knows where ALL the skeletons are buried and he helped kill a few -- all the way back to Texas. But he COULD decide to spend more time with his family and take a big office on K street. Question, do we have to pay his retirement for life?

The comments by posters on your blog regarding keeping up the pressure on the administration was an excellent one. We've already seen how successful it can be. In Karl's own words: "attack, attack, attack!"
Yup! "It's hard to keep your mind on draining the swamp ..."
Agree on 1-2 pertinent topics for the day; if you get real answers, it's open season on questions. If not, what can they do? Bar you all from the briefings? And if they try to do it a few at a time, well, there's the topic for the following day.

Go for it folks! It's actually becoming informative to watch!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Bush's Armor Is Disintegrating"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jul 14, 2005 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, what a welcome breeze, what a wonderful brightening of the sun, to watch reporters actually standing up to the tinhorn bullies in the White House. Granted, it took a breech of national security – arguably a treasonous offense – by "Mr. Potatohead" K-K-K Karl Rove to FINALLY get the ball rolling; but it just made my little democratic heart go pitty-pat to hear Dana Milbank as much as call Scott McClellen a liar to his face.

Here's to hoping the media has found their cohones, now that they smell blood, and will accelerate the exposure of past and present criminality by the most inept and dishonest administration in America's history.

They've found a chink in Bush's armor – maybe now they'll show the public that it's rusted out, as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's blood in the water
Posted by: Bluecat on Jul 14, 2005 11:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My heart also leaped with new vigor when I saw the reporters finally putting the pressure on the endless pap spewed by Scott. They do smell the blood in the water, it doesn't take a genius to see the polls on bush, the war..people have been afraid of this repressive regime, but I think the tipping point has been reached, and been pushed by all of us who find the darkness of the bushies too much to bear. People are sick of the absolute corruption and deceptions of this administration. Let the sharks at 'em!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]