Who's Guarding Montana from a Firestorm?

BILLINGS, Montana -- As fire season gets underway in Montana this summer, the Pentagon's increased reliance on the state's National Guard to help fight our foreign wars has turned into a serious local issue.

Brian Schweitzer, the Democratic Governor of this state, reviewed the potential emergencies that face Montana, largely a massive fire danger this summer due to low snowpack levels and insect infestations in trees, and requested the Pentagon to rotate more Guard troops out of Iraq and into Montana for the critical fire months of July and August.

Schweitzer has been among the most outspoken governors on the Pentagon’s overuse of the Guard, which has left states without key resources to deal with natural disasters and local defense. He's frustrated that 1,300 of Montana’s roughly 3,500 National Guard soldiers and airmen have been called up to active duty, deployed as military police to Afghanistan, Iraq and locations across the United States. Schweitzer says that Washington has placed the burden of domestic defense on governors without providing them the tools. "I said, 'look, you have told me that I, as governor, am responsible first and foremost for national security in Montana -- don't come crying to Washington.'"

The Pentagon's response to Schweitzer's request for more Guard troops this summer was brief. "There wasn't a conversation," he says. "The answer wasn't how many assets. The answer wasn't when. The answer was just no. So you've got commanders-in-chief and we're told to plan. And when we do, we're told no."

One of the problems with fire planning is that no one really knows what the fire danger will be in any given year. But from early on in 2005, fire experts have predicted a summer of blaze for Montana, which has had seven straight years of drought. In 2000, the last year that Montana had serious wildfires, the state required not only National Guard forces, but also a battalion of regular Army troops help fight the fires.

In Montana and elsewhere in the dry-land West, governors are concerned about fires. In Florida, the Guard is occasionally called out to respond to hurricanes. Each state, Schweitzer argues, has its own needs and times when it knows it may face emergency situations: tornado season, hurricane season, mudslide season, fire season.

Governors and state leaders across the country share Schweitzer's concerns. The issue cuts across partisan lines, with Democratic governors like Ted Kulongoski of Oregon expressing concerns right alongside Republican Dirk Kempthorne of Idaho. Kulongoski told the Oregonian that the federal government's growing use of the Guard is not "good for the states, and I don't think it's good for the National Guard." And Kempthorne, who often works on National Guard issues on behalf of the National Governors Association, sent a letter to the Pentagon's National Guard Bureau expressing concern about the bureau's commitment to ensure that states have adequate resources to deal with emergencies.

Governor Schweitzer says that if the Pentagon would just simply listen to governors, a plan that balanced the emergency response needs of the states with the military needs of the federal government could be worked out. The problem is that the federal government isn't working with governors.

The Pentagon counters that it has put guidelines in place to ensure that states are not left helpless in the case of emergencies. Lt. Gen. Steven Blum, who oversees the Pentagon's National Guard Bureau, has pledged that the federal government will not call up more than 50% of a state's Guard personnel. In the case that more personnel is needed, Major Scott Smith of the Montana National Guard says that Mutual Aid Compacts and federal assistance can overcome a shortfall.