COMMENTS: 124
Oh Baby, It's Drafty Out There
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
"Talk of a draft is chilling," intones The New York Times.
Even fashion magazines weigh in: "Could Cosmo girl get drafted?"
In city streets, town squares and rural strip malls, military recruiters are beleaguered. The Army is unable to meet recruiting targets even after lowering quotas and standards. At the same time, recruiters are overwhelmed by scandal and scrutiny, and uncomfortable in the face of growing anti-war sentiment.
Though half a world away, the war in Iraq feels close. Mounting U.S. casualties, exhausted soldiers and an intractable civil conflict in which the only thing different factions agree on is that U.S. soldiers are the problem, make military service increasingly unattractive to even the most gung-ho patriot. Meanwhile, Washington is determined to "stay the course" right over the brink.
J.E. McNeil, executive director of the Center on Conscience and War, is preparing for the worst. She sees a "perfect storm" of conditions brewing a return to the draft. So far, more than one million U.S. military personnel have served in Iraq and Afghanistan. An estimated 341,000 soldiers have done double deployments (and many are now entering their third deployment). And they are not just serving, they are dying. More than 1,700 have been killed, and an average of two more soldiers die each day.
Recruiting Nightmares
For more and more young people, joining the military doesn't mean "Be all you can be," it means going to war. And the Army is feeling the chill.
Major General Michael Rochelle, Army Recruiting Commander, worries that the war and other military commitments present the "toughest challenge to the all-volunteer army" since its inception in 1973. Staff Sergeant Spurgeon M. Shelly, a recruiter, complains how tough recruiting is. "I will hear 'No' more times in one day than a child would hear in their entire childhood. If I had hair, I would pull it out."
He signed up four recruits in six months, putting him way below his quota of two recruits per month.
Recruiters are hiding police records, mental illness and physical ailments to make their quotas. An Army investigation into recruitment improprieties found 1,118 incidents involving one in five recruiters. The Army substantiated 320 of these cases in 2004, up from 213 in 2002 and 199 in 1999. Recruiters and some senior army officers admit that for every documented impropriety, there are at least two more that are never discovered. "We have to play fast and loose with the rules just to get by," one recruiter told The New York Times.
Another recruiter laments, "The only people who want to join the Army now have issues; they're troubled, with health, police or drug problems."
After a dismal record of missed quotas each month throughout the spring, the Army stalled on releasing enlistment data for May. Finally in mid-June, the Army reported achieving 75 percent of its monthly recruiting goal of 6,700. But the Army did not attract more recruits; it moved the goal posts, lowering its May target from 8,050 new recruits, asserting it would make up the difference this summer.
Furthest From Our Thoughts?
The Pentagon and the President promise that the draft is a thing of the past. "The D-word is the farthest thing from my thoughts," Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army, told a Washington Post reporter in March, laughing.
The Pentagon's position is that a professional all-volunteer army performs better, has higher morale and is less costly to train. Last October, President Bush was adamant on the question, saying, "I want every American to understand that, as long as I am President, there will be no draft."
The Nixon administration retired the military draft in 1973, but mandatory registration of men at the age of 18 was reinstituted in 1980 under President Carter, and today the Selective Service System has 13.5 million men ages 18-25 registered.
McNeil's perspective that the draft is creeping back is strengthened by recent announcements by Selective Service that it can now register and draft healthcare workers, computer specialists, linguists and other personnel if necessary. In March, the SSS issued a report notifying the President that "it would be ready to implement a draft within 75 days" following Congressional authorization. While spokesman Richard Flahavan says the steps are "strictly in the planning stages," and the report was part of the SSS' annual budget request, these moves agitate fears of a returning draft.
Military expert David Segal believes that a new military conscription policy would galvanize an anti-draft movement that would dwarf that of the 1960s. The expectation that the draft would rouse a complacent populace into a powerful and mainstream anti-war movement fuels the draft-watch fixation of websites like Nodraftnoway.org, Stopthedraft.com and Draftfreedom.org.
The Wrong Question
But, for many in the counter-recruitment movement, "Is the draft coming back?" is the wrong question.
Marti Hiken, co-chair of the Military Law Taskforce, does not see the draft on the far-off horizon; she sees it as existing reality for hundreds of thousands of Americans.
There is the "poverty draft" of young people who are told the military is their only path to a career; the "backdoor draft" of the Stop-Loss program which mandates soldiers stay in active duty for up to 24 months after their contracts have expired; "the senior draft" in which reservists (who make up 40 percent of the fighting force in Iraq) are compelled back into active military service; and finally, there is the "secret draft" of mercenaries and private military contractors.
For Hiken, worrying about the draft is an abstraction compared to the havoc wreaked by these real but covert forms of compulsory service.
For every covert draft, Hiken sees grassroots groups countering and gaining traction. A lot of the energy is focused on the outrages of Stop-Loss, which has been legally challenged eight times so far. One suit, brought by Emiliano Santiago in Oregon, climbed to the Supreme Court before it was rejected and Santiago was shipped off to Afghanistan to re-join his unit. Representative Jim McDermott (D-WA) championed Santiago's case, saying on the floor of the House, "Santiago's plight should be known and feared by every high school junior and senior across the country. The ugly little secret in the Pentagon is that Emiliano Santiago's voluntary service is involuntary."
Hiken says that even though Santiago lost his case, the ruling "fanned the fires of counter-recruitment work," and made people "think twice before signing up for the military," playing a "critical role in lowering enlistment levels."
Another case, on behalf of soldier David W. Qualls and seven John Does, was filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C in December and is still in the motions phase. Overall, Hiken says, "I have not seen a grassroots movement like the one we have now. In every community people are fighting."
Military Unwelcome
Rick Jahnkow, an organizer with the Committee Opposed to Militarism and the Draft, thinks more people should be joining those fights rather than wringing their hands about a possible draft.
The longtime counter-recruitment activist says it's not "a total waste of time to talk about the draft," but he is quick to add that it is not enough.
"We have to reverse the militarization of school, campus and society," says Jahnkow, listing "military recruitment, the poverty draft, the militarization of curriculum through Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (J-ROTC)" as important targets. He worries that young people's acculturation to the military will make a future draft easier. "We need to undermine and delegitimize those programs, make them unwelcome," he says.
That is exactly what people are doing in communities around the country.
Kevin Ramirez, an organizer with Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors, catalogues recent actions making the military very unwelcome in schools and on campuses.
At Seattle Central Community College in January, "students literally chased Army recruiters off campus." The following month, college students in New Haven tabling with counter-recruitment materials "received so much positive attention from other students" that the military recruiters packed up their tables and left. In Bloomington, Minnesota, Ramirez continues, a high school group fought their administration and the American Legion to allow "counter-recruitment tables and information" equal access to their school and they won.
The movement against Stop-Loss, counter-recruitment actions, young people organizing to get the military out of their schools, and the ongoing work to end the war and bring the troops home resonates today and tomorrow, whether or not President Bush asks Congress to vote to reinstate the draft. These movements sustain hope and save lives, while hinting at what a de-militarized United States would look like. These movements prove that we don't have to wait for a draft to have an impact.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dearkitty on Jul 5, 2005 3:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are even more: like the specific situations for, eg, African American youth on one hand; children of privileged people on the other hand. See here.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: treehuggingliberal on Jul 5, 2005 3:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“The following statements are not promises or guarantees of any kind…but which Congress can change at any time.”
“In the event of war, my enlistment in the Armed Forces continues until 6 months after the war ends, unless my enlistment is ended sooner by the President of the United States.”
“As a member of the Ready Reserve…In time of national emergency declared by the President of the United States, I may be ordered to active duty…for not more than 24 consecutive months.”
A few points to consider: Are we really at war? Did Congress declare war? Did the President not declare “Mission Accomplished”? There is the “War on Terrorism,” but I believe that is like the “War on Drugs and the War on Crime”; ongoing but never-ending; political rhetoric used during election times. Will any court cases be ruled in favor of the defendants serving involuntarily? I sincerely doubt it, due to the fact that this administration has packed the lower courts with questionable judges.
I had the opportunity to ask D. Rumsfeld when he thought Stop-Loss would end. Of course instead of answering my question, he proceeded to tell me what Stop-Loss was. I know what Stop-Loss is, and I have fulfilled my 8 year contract on active duty and therefore not required to serve in the Ready Reserve. I have effectively been drafted. My deployment/servitude ends in October. Will I be able to take control over my life at that time? Who knows? They keep changing the rules of the game and I have limited alternatives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Breach of Contract
Posted by: Longhorn
» RE: Breach of Contract
Posted by: treehuggingliberal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 5, 2005 4:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Peace!
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Freedom Service
Posted by: treehuggingliberal
» RE: Freedom Service
Posted by: MausMasher
» RE: It's coming - Get ready
Posted by: JLRichardson
» RE: It's coming - Get ready
Posted by: Tom Degan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stevewilkesuk on Jul 5, 2005 5:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're not yet at that stage in the UK, but it's been disturbing to see the massive increase in army recuitment TV ads and billboards everywhere over here. We've even had local TV news reports (on the BBC) with reporters abseiling with the Royal Marines - just to show how much fun being the army is. Lucky for us it's not our war so we're not providing enough troops to have to worry about a draft.
These trends also have to be a blow to the Project For a New American Century (ie. the Bush administration)'s plans for "multiple wars fought on multiple fronts" in the future.
The end of these wars is in sight!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: History repeating
Posted by: Dutch668
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LMNOP on Jul 5, 2005 5:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No comment.
Frankly, I thought that the twin issues of an impending draft and a rapidly growing monster of a national debt for posterity to service would galvanize the American youth and lead to a strong outpouring of 18-25 year olds at the ballot boxes. But on Election Day, most of them were nowhere to be found. The numbers for this demographic were particularly appalling. Their votes could have made the difference in what was an extremely close race, but despite the huge stake that they had in its outcome, the young voters were apathetic and complacent. It cost all of us, but it cost them more than most.
Several months ago I posted a similar blurb wherein I concluded that since this group had let others decide their fates for them, they had little ground on which to complain if they didn't like the decisions that were being made on their behalf. Rather than being contrite, young readers were furious with me for not being more supportive and sympathetic. So I will not draw any conclusions here but instead leave the reader to come to his own.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» WHY BOTHER?
Posted by: susan9390
» I'LL TELL YOU WHY
Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: I'LL TELL YOU WHY
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: WHY BOTHER?
Posted by: jshubbub
» RE: NEXT TIME, ROCK THE VOTE
Posted by: VAGreen
» RE: NEXT TIME, ROCK THE VOTE
Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: NEXT TIME, ROCK THE VOTE
Posted by: pjmax
» RE: NEXT TIME, ROCK THE VOTE
Posted by: papergirl
» RE: NEXT TIME, ROCK THE VOTE
Posted by: Herbert3
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bab5nutz on Jul 5, 2005 6:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the draft is reinstated, I don't know what will happen. But a pretty good guess would be that is that there would be blood in the streets - literally. It could get very nasty, very fast.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes, we did say that!
Posted by: sausage
» We also said:
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: We also said:
Posted by: Halaby
» RE: Hell, No! We Won't ...
Posted by: susan9390
» RE: Hell, No! We Won't ...
Posted by: jake
» RE: Hell, No! We Won't ...
Posted by: kaethy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bamage on Jul 5, 2005 6:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: Longhorn
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: susan9390
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: dandelion
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: Gene
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: sheherezade
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: Kat144
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pepper on Jul 5, 2005 6:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Loss of property rights by eminant domain. Their parents homes can now be confiscated.
2. Loss of the Bill of Rights! I could go on adnauseum on this one but you all know which ones have been viciously attacked and rendered moot.
3. Loss of citizenship if your desiignated by the current nazi regime an "enemy combatant". This needs no explanation.
4. The institutionalization of torture in America.
5. Loss of sovereignty as currently passed by the Congress in the CAFTA Bill in which vitamins and minerals will be take away and given to the "baby killing drug companies" THis is a direct assault on Americas right to "Life, liberty and pursuit of Happiness.
6. Total and complete violation of the Posse Comitatus law in which the military now occupies civilian streets as seen during protest demonstations. Gosh, it looked like China, tanks taking on unarmed protestors.
7. National ID card and if you don't carry it, you can be arrested. That is in the new law. Can you believe it? Remember Nazi Germany and the gestapo? "Your papers, please"!
8. Finally, last but not least, the right to work. All high paying jobs have been outsourced to foreign countries, 60% of miliary spending of our tax dollars is contracted out to foreign companies and countries. How did that happen??? OUR TAX DOLLARS USED TO CREATE JOBS FOR SOMEOTHER COUNTRY????
So, that is what we will be asking of our children who will have no jobs to come back to after they are either maimed, wounded or otherwise scared for life. I DON'T THINK SO!
This time, I am telling the kids to resist and go to jail rather than fight this dirty war for oil and military industrial complex profits as we were warned by Gen/Pres Eisenhower in 1961. WE did not listen then, but we are listening now.
NO DRAFT AND NO COOPERATION. PRotect the children and hide them, send them overseas, do not send them to Canada. They are going through the same thing we are and a treaty is now in place to return those who run. SEnd the to Venezuela. LOL They hate the US Gov almost as much as we do right now. hahahahaha Now there is a place we could fight for our freedoms by helping them. P
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» If there is a draft please do come to Canada
Posted by: demidesigrrl
» RE: If there is a draft please do come to Canada
Posted by: Kat144
» RE: What would these draftees be fighting for???
Posted by: DavidTbone
» RE: What would these draftees be fighting for???
Posted by: dandelion
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on Jul 5, 2005 7:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks in part to the "let those who want to be there (i.e. the military), be there" position of Vietnam era draft resistance organizations, the United States military is no longer made up of short-term citizen soldiers but a large standing professional army. The lessons of history are clear: large standing professional armies lead to military dictatorships. Moreover, professional militaries tend to foster a sense of separateness and moral superiority toward the majority of the civilian population. The United States Marine Corps is an extreme example of this attitude found among many front-line combat troops. It is also seeping out into the civilian world as returning veterans take positions in law enforcement agencies.
The Reagan administration made it easy for Americans to "support the troops" with little sacrifice. A yard sign now suffices for many.
It is time to return to the concept of "the citizen soldier." Progressives should either support a national service draft, such as the now moribund Hollings-Rangel Bill, or the recommendations of Andrew J. Bacevich.
Perhaps had our military not been full of men and women who are there because they want to be there Bush may have thought twice about committing them to a disastrous foreign misadventure. Perhaps, had there been draftees in the American military on March 20, 2003. soldiers might have taken Prof. Lawrence Mosqueda's advice and refused to obey a mad president's unlawful order.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Draft resistors bear some responsibility for our current situation
Posted by: Pepper
» And "they" will never send their children or grandchildren...
Posted by: sausage
» RE: And "they" will never send their children or grandchildren...
Posted by: jakstrate
» MORE SPIN!
Posted by: susan9390
» Sure, It's all Jane Fonda's Fault ....
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: DECEITFUL NEOCONS bear all responsibility for our current situation
Posted by: jakstrate
» RE: Draft resistors bear some responsibility for our current situation
Posted by: Halaby
Comments are closed-
Posted by: troodos on Jul 5, 2005 8:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go to www.congress.org and if you know what your zip code is, put it in the convenient space provided for it and press "go" and the program will find your senators and represenatives for you. Then you can complain to your hearts content. I know its not as snappy as writing your idiot comments on this blog but it sure will have an effect.
Since you people were too lazy or couldn't take time out from bending your elbow at the bar to vote against the idiot who now resides in the White House thanks to your non-voting propensities, perhaps you can write to your senators and representatives and keep your a-- out of uniform and support the troops by bringing them home.
If you do nothing again, then you deserve what you get AGAIN!!!!
Get smart, get writing where it will do some good.
Remember the sign on the refrigerator door:
" A small town in Texas is missing its idiot."
Perhaps you can do everybody a favor and send the idiot back to Crawford.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» GET REAL...
Posted by: susan9390
» RE: GET REAL...
Posted by: dandelion
» your comments are degrading
Posted by: dai766
» RE: your comments are degrading
Posted by: Kajamian
» RE: your comments are degrading
Posted by: dai766
» RE: your comments are degrading
Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: your comments are degrading
Posted by: Kat144
» RE: Troodos12
Posted by: faye
» RE: Troodos12
Posted by: jakstrate
» Oh, please
Posted by: Kat144
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BILL D on Jul 5, 2005 8:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of the all the spin, an incident must happen. Such incident
would have to have the magnitude or worse than the one
that was devised on 9-11 that entailed extenisve planning.
based on what they pulled off on 9-11 is beyond my
imagination, so a new one would really have to jack up
support of all the sheeple that still have thier heads burried
in the muck of lies and deception.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: GOVT WATCHER
Posted by: twotroo2bgood
» RE: GOVT WATCHER
Posted by: dandelion
» RE: GOVT WATCHER
Posted by: treehuggingliberal
» RE: GOVT WATCHER
Posted by: Ratmonster Spook
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jyoung on Jul 5, 2005 9:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, after reading about the money being made (essentially a new kind of war profiteering) in articles and programs like this Frontline episode - "Private Warriors" I don't know why the US would want to reinstate the draft. When so many private US and International corporations are seeing money pour in, and therefore shareholder value increasing, by gaining contracts into facets of military action never before yielded to private sources, it would actually seem to be detrimental to these various economies to reinstate the draft.
Why would those who profit economically and politically from the war choose to divert the current flow of money in order to train unwilling, underpaid, draftees who's parents are back home finally asking tough questions and/or protesting? That's a horrible scenario for this administration.
I tend to agree with it being 'the wrong question'. I feel that the military effort will continue to grow using a mixture of underpaid strictly managed enlisted military working along side overpaid unaccountable private military support service agencies. There's something horribly perverse about private companies being paid billions of tax dollars to feed underpaid troops 3 different kinds of ice cream and pizza before sending them off in ill equipped Humvees to be attacked by insurgents that didn't exist until after we entered the country - but this kind of catastrophe is a lot more subtle than a draft. Which is why a draft won't come until things get way more desperate.
So for now I see the concern over the draft as being a dream of the anti-war movement. It represents that desperate hope that a draft would: awaken the sleeping giant of civil dissent; reveal the truth and lies behind this war; prove the draft nay-sayers wrong. But for the Bush administration, there are still other options to be implemented, and there remains a strong self interest in keeping that giant asleep.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Draft as anti-war dream?
Posted by: dandelion
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sheherezade on Jul 5, 2005 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Abstinence Pledge
Posted by: Kat144
Comments are closed-
Posted by: luckycef on Jul 5, 2005 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was in all medical and dental was covered by the US Govt. for the family. Now they make em pay for a big chunk. The servicemembers are in POVERTY PAY and making ends meet is very hard. They just keep taking away and away, this in turns drives away good people
The Military Exchange and Commissary is a big joke, no sales tax but they get away with a surcharge that accounts for the same thing a Tax in disguise.
There are a few things that do have a reduction but the items most service persons buy are higher or the same. Not much of a bargain and sales on the most bought items.
The fuel prices are good but 40 cents higher than the Govt. contract and the base it on what it would cost at civilian gas stations in the US. This price will fluctuate as the prices change even though they have a set price for year that does not change.
In other words the Military is its own worst enemy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Jul 5, 2005 11:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you can't afford college, then the military is path to take. Why? Because a college education, like a Lamborghini, is out of their price range, lest their parents cough up the money or having to work two jobs to pay for it.
If you pay attention to the Army's catchy commercials like "An Army of One" or this one from yesteryear-"Be All That You Can Be; Find Your Future in the Army" doesn't register a rush to a recruitment office these days.
I think people expect American military campaigns to be painless and with few deaths as possible. They think our fancy weapons and other gadgets is enough, but you still need someone to operate the guns and man the vehicles.
One last thing; It's good to see people stand up to the militarization of our schools by trying to eliminate ROTC programs. My high school had a NJROTC-Naval Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps and I was amazed that some of my friends joined it.
The army of the future is already here. You won't find rich kids enlisting....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: iana_gheddis420 on Jul 5, 2005 1:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Iana
Posted by: diamondvajra
» What kind of ignorant jackass are you???????
Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: Iana
Posted by: Somedaysoon
» RE: Iana
Posted by: jakstrate
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Schmedlap on Jul 5, 2005 1:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Potential draftees would benefit is at least two ways:
- First, the sons and daughters of the affluent and influential would have no more opportunity to avoid the draft than the son of the sons and daughters of the guileless pauper.
- Second, the draft pool would be very large thereby decreasing substantially the odds of being caught in the sort of draft contrived for Vietnam, where I served.
The nation would be better off because the Armed Forces would have broader cross-section of talent, some of whom may even speak Arabic or Farsi.
I have seen college graduate, two-year draftee Spec-4s work directly with low IQ, but hard working, twenty years of service Spec-4s. These troops develop a mutual respect which is sadly missing in our now class-conscioius nation. When these people end their military status, they have developed an empathy, not otherwise obtainable, for the other fellow resulting in legislation that would not be as skewed toward the wealthy as it is today.
The nation would also benefit because there would be a much greater reluctance on the part of the government to frivolously initiate a war. Lives valuable to civilian pursuits and to essential military endeavors would not be squandered and billions, if not trillions, more dollars would be available for more worthy domestic and foreign uses.
I served in the volunteer Army for years as well, and while the all volunteeer force does have some benefits, I believe that these do not compare to what we have lost in the Army by eliminating the draft. I'd bet that even the GIs with service in Iraq would agree with that (once they got out of the service, of course).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Draft
Posted by: Kajamian
» RE: Draft
Posted by: Gene
Comments are closed-
Posted by: diamondvajra on Jul 5, 2005 1:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Like Kerry and Biden will stop the war?
Posted by: sheherezade
Comments are closed-
Posted by: diamondvajra on Jul 5, 2005 1:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: iana_gheddis420
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: rubymydear
» :-)
Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: iana_gheddis420
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: Product of Public Schools
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: Schmedlap
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: iana_gheddis420
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: MausMasher
» Grow up lad
Posted by: taxidave
Comments are closed-
Posted by: diof09 on Jul 5, 2005 2:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» and even worse
Posted by: WhatNow?
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whitis on Jul 5, 2005 4:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Draft legislation goes by names like "bancruptcy bill", "CAFTA", "war on drugs", "patriot act", etc.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Halaby on Jul 5, 2005 5:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh really?
Posted by: Halaby
» RE: Oh really?
Posted by: Halaby
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fat otter on Jul 5, 2005 6:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: royrogers on Jul 5, 2005 7:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Close the space between information and clearinghouse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: royrogers on Jul 5, 2005 8:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Close the space between information and clearinghouse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rad on Jul 5, 2005 11:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sunny308 on Jul 6, 2005 7:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at the long term effects of how a draft would force a president to obey the Constitution. We have not been involved in a constitutional war since WWII. Could you picture the Bush twins patrolling the streets of Takrit?
Citizen (Capital C)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Go for the Draft
Posted by: goldenbb
» RE: Go for the Draft
Posted by: sunny308
» RE: Go for the Draft
Posted by: Kat144
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Schmedlap on Jul 6, 2005 8:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"BBC NEWS
European unemployment rates fall
Strong job creation in Germany and Spain pushed European unemployment rates lower in May, Eurostat data show.
Both saw unemployment rates drop from double-digit figures: Germany's unemployment rate fell from 10% to 9.6% and Spain's to 9.9% from 10%.
In both the EU at large and in the smaller eurozone, the unemployment rate fell to 8.8% in May from 8.9% in April.
In the 25 EU member states there were 19.1 million job seekers, 12.8 million of them in the eurozone.
Unemployment rates are high when compared with the US, where the unemployment rate is 5.1%, and Japan, where the rate is 4.4%.
And in Europe's two biggest economies, Germany and France, high unemployment has become a political issue.
Lengthy battle
Friday's data follows a report released earlier this week, which showed German business confidence had improved for the first time in five months.
The recent fall in the euro sparked fresh optimism among German firms.
Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's proposed economic reforms have however met with much resistance, where unemployment hit its highest level since the 1930s earlier this year.
On Friday, Mr Schroeder lost a confidence vote in parliament, paving the way for its dissolution and early elections, as he wanted.
"If we are to continue with this agenda, legitimacy through new elections is required," Mr Schroeder said.
In neighbouring France, where the unemployment rate it at a five-year peak of 10.2%, Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin has made the battle against unemployment a priority."
Story from BBC NEWS, published on July 1, 2005.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 12%
Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: goldenbb on Jul 6, 2005 8:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not as if we the people are, or ever have been, in control of the US government, so why bother getting involved? My experiences with the feds are running nearly 100% NEGATIVE at this point in my life. How much cynicism am I supposed to ignore before I just throw in the towel on the whole damn bunch of nonsense? The more 18-25 year olds who drop out, the better chance America has of being good again. If you never buy in, they can't control your choices.
And how is Milton Friedman to blame for the all-volunteer military? I thought it was Congress that orchestrated that after the Vietnam war in hopes of ensuring there would never be another Vietnam war. Guess that didn't work, either. At least we are not watching poorly trained draftees dying by the thousands (yet).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Non-voters are pathetic!!!
Posted by: Diecash1
» They already won. n/t
Posted by: Kat144
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jake on Jul 6, 2005 10:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gedlo on Jul 6, 2005 1:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prior to the invasion of Eye-rack there were MANY demonstrations in the USA where MILLIONS of people demonstrated against the war. Congress ADMITTED that their mail was close to 90% against....and those whores voted the limited endorsement for the war, which the Moe-ron didn't follow anyway. Couple those facts with Diebold voting machines (What possible legitimate purpose do voting machines that cannot be audited serve?), and the rational folks conclude that we are waaaay beyond the illusory two-party politics here. It's either tar and feather time, or the nation (and possibly the world) are down the tubes. Our so-called "leaders" were bought and paid for a long time ago. Oh for a few congressmen like George Galloway!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VAGreen on Jul 6, 2005 3:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: timtufuga on Jul 7, 2005 3:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now we have seen America at its most ugliest face. America and their war on terror has become a war which will remain an indictment against American hegemonic leadership disaster and an indignation by a world fed up with the halfhearted raison de tre for joining an ignominous war in the middle east. So how would anyone in congress allow unbridled power to force its own people to fight an ignoniminous war for Caesar Commodus's honour, profit and American imperial nascency.
when he is offended then his definition of evil doers are transformed into terrorists as may be noted with NY loss of the Olympics and then the bombing in London only a ew hours ago. I can only suggest that America is guilty of the "Kettle calling the Pot Black". Who is going to punsih America now for an overt act of terror against Londoners?????
This reminds me of Rainbow Warrior in NZ, in 1985, and the French were guilty then, and since the American and French were too powerful NZ, were Pyrrhic in their cries of foul play, they could not fight back France or America for that matter this time as well. Is America and France in collusion once again now, is England like NZ once again in 2005???? Who can truly be held accountable in this instance? Great Britain and The Commonwealth of Nations, might find some teeth though, we might have our covert war actioned very soon now. This time the "Coalition of the Willing" might be dead and buried, Al Qaida can not be blamed for this one for sure. Australia will be good to America because of their contractual obligations for the F22 Strikefighters and other goodies for sycophancy to America.
You might need conscription for America to fight the Commonwealth of Nations for a real war on terror. How about that for something real and relevant for conscription for idle and useless Yankee trash?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» What a load of incoherent bull$@@%!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: What a load of incoherent bull$@@%!!!!!!!!
Posted by: royrogers
» RE: What a load of incoherent bull$@@%!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: What a load of incoherent bull$@@%!!!!!!!!
Posted by: royrogers
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Alusch on Jul 7, 2005 8:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Russia's state prosecutor announced Tuesday afternoon that he is canceling an investigation into claims that a 19th century abridged code of Jewish law (halakha) contains incitement against non-Jews. …
Controversial text, quoted from “Kitzur Shulhan Arukh”:
linked text
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sethpjohnson on Jul 9, 2005 5:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is ridiculous. You can predict who will join the Army based on social factors, who their parents are. What does that say about choice? What does that mean for a volunteer army? It means good press, thats what.
Choice, its the reason that although on September 11 more people died from cigarettes than from plane crashes we only care about the plane crashes. We have an all-volunteer smoking brigade, so who cares? Its their choice.
Choice, girls wear more jewelry than boys. What does that say about choice?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jul 9, 2005 11:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This resulted in a 'less than marginal' report and
an honorable discharge, even better a reenlistment classification that was so low they would draft the disabled before me. Try it guys it'll help. Then we stop putting folks that believe killing is an acceptable 'Final Solution' in positions of power.They want better killing toys and
will commit treason to make a sale.We adopt a far better 'Forgien Policy' .9/11 taught us that our current and past policies pretty much stunk.The
Light of the World does'nt get terrorized, unless of course it really shines a dark light.If you judge by their actions you'd have to agree that with the recycling personell
program militarization seathing into our lives it is truly a Dark Light that they shine.Combat Veterans,start telling the truth about what combat looks like, the truth about how disturbing it is to light your buddies cigarette and before the match is out you're looking at someone without a face,and you did'nt hear the shot.Or how you almost threw up seeing 3 guys whose life you're trying to save that have their skin blown off.
There is great strength in the path of the Peacemaker but it does'nt come from Force of Arms.It comes from respecting others culture,religion,and natural rescorces.It comes by not dangling the rotted carrot our forgien has been. Become 'The Walkers of our Talk'.If you're going to end poverty,end it!
The electing of killer/contractors must stop.
Don't forget to check yourself.To be a Peacemaker is not easy
by any means.You become the wellspring of Tolerance,Understanding and Compassion.You have respect for every Living Thing and for those you see as not living.You become willing to give the shirt off your back
to someone worse off than you,even if it's your only shirt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rockpicker on Jul 9, 2005 3:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When we start from deluded sleep
at last, and know the dream
for dream, embraced en masse...
When bells that rang victorious
hang mute, their tarnished claims
ignored in disrepute,
and bitter sons, having been all
they could be, can't wish back the hand
or the leg below the knee...
(The brash regime trims reason
from its ranks, its black guard
in the street, protecting flanks.)
Then will we heed the schemers'
gloating leer? "There's no future
for any of you here."
So row on row, with hand
in trembling hand, it's come to this:
we dreamers better stand.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: metamind on Jul 10, 2005 8:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
didn't find anything. It's basically a draft for service to one's
country. You could choose whether you wanted to serve in
a military or non-military role but every young person would
have to serve in some capacity unless they were physically
or mentally unable to do so. No exemptions for college ... you'd
have to do it after you got out of college.
As far as the idea that these Republicans will keep throwing
money at people to get them to sign up .... consider the
possibility of an economic collapse. It may be closer than
we realize.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gwynnivere on May 2, 2006 4:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dearkitty on Jul 5, 2005 3:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are even more: like the specific situations for, eg, African American youth on one hand; children of privileged people on the other hand. See here.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: treehuggingliberal on Jul 5, 2005 3:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“The following statements are not promises or guarantees of any kind…but which Congress can change at any time.”
“In the event of war, my enlistment in the Armed Forces continues until 6 months after the war ends, unless my enlistment is ended sooner by the President of the United States.”
“As a member of the Ready Reserve…In time of national emergency declared by the President of the United States, I may be ordered to active duty…for not more than 24 consecutive months.”
A few points to consider: Are we really at war? Did Congress declare war? Did the President not declare “Mission Accomplished”? There is the “War on Terrorism,” but I believe that is like the “War on Drugs and the War on Crime”; ongoing but never-ending; political rhetoric used during election times. Will any court cases be ruled in favor of the defendants serving involuntarily? I sincerely doubt it, due to the fact that this administration has packed the lower courts with questionable judges.
I had the opportunity to ask D. Rumsfeld when he thought Stop-Loss would end. Of course instead of answering my question, he proceeded to tell me what Stop-Loss was. I know what Stop-Loss is, and I have fulfilled my 8 year contract on active duty and therefore not required to serve in the Ready Reserve. I have effectively been drafted. My deployment/servitude ends in October. Will I be able to take control over my life at that time? Who knows? They keep changing the rules of the game and I have limited alternatives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Breach of Contract
Posted by: Longhorn
» RE: Breach of Contract
Posted by: treehuggingliberal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 5, 2005 4:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Peace!
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Freedom Service
Posted by: treehuggingliberal
» RE: Freedom Service
Posted by: MausMasher
» RE: It's coming - Get ready
Posted by: JLRichardson
» RE: It's coming - Get ready
Posted by: Tom Degan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stevewilkesuk on Jul 5, 2005 5:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're not yet at that stage in the UK, but it's been disturbing to see the massive increase in army recuitment TV ads and billboards everywhere over here. We've even had local TV news reports (on the BBC) with reporters abseiling with the Royal Marines - just to show how much fun being the army is. Lucky for us it's not our war so we're not providing enough troops to have to worry about a draft.
These trends also have to be a blow to the Project For a New American Century (ie. the Bush administration)'s plans for "multiple wars fought on multiple fronts" in the future.
The end of these wars is in sight!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: History repeating
Posted by: Dutch668
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LMNOP on Jul 5, 2005 5:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No comment.
Frankly, I thought that the twin issues of an impending draft and a rapidly growing monster of a national debt for posterity to service would galvanize the American youth and lead to a strong outpouring of 18-25 year olds at the ballot boxes. But on Election Day, most of them were nowhere to be found. The numbers for this demographic were particularly appalling. Their votes could have made the difference in what was an extremely close race, but despite the huge stake that they had in its outcome, the young voters were apathetic and complacent. It cost all of us, but it cost them more than most.
Several months ago I posted a similar blurb wherein I concluded that since this group had let others decide their fates for them, they had little ground on which to complain if they didn't like the decisions that were being made on their behalf. Rather than being contrite, young readers were furious with me for not being more supportive and sympathetic. So I will not draw any conclusions here but instead leave the reader to come to his own.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» WHY BOTHER?
Posted by: susan9390
» I'LL TELL YOU WHY
Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: I'LL TELL YOU WHY
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: WHY BOTHER?
Posted by: jshubbub
» RE: NEXT TIME, ROCK THE VOTE
Posted by: VAGreen
» RE: NEXT TIME, ROCK THE VOTE
Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: NEXT TIME, ROCK THE VOTE
Posted by: pjmax
» RE: NEXT TIME, ROCK THE VOTE
Posted by: papergirl
» RE: NEXT TIME, ROCK THE VOTE
Posted by: Herbert3
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bab5nutz on Jul 5, 2005 6:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the draft is reinstated, I don't know what will happen. But a pretty good guess would be that is that there would be blood in the streets - literally. It could get very nasty, very fast.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes, we did say that!
Posted by: sausage
» We also said:
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: We also said:
Posted by: Halaby
» RE: Hell, No! We Won't ...
Posted by: susan9390
» RE: Hell, No! We Won't ...
Posted by: jake
» RE: Hell, No! We Won't ...
Posted by: kaethy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bamage on Jul 5, 2005 6:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: Longhorn
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: susan9390
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: dandelion
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: Gene
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: sheherezade
» RE: I'm ALL FOR a Draft...
Posted by: Kat144
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pepper on Jul 5, 2005 6:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Loss of property rights by eminant domain. Their parents homes can now be confiscated.
2. Loss of the Bill of Rights! I could go on adnauseum on this one but you all know which ones have been viciously attacked and rendered moot.
3. Loss of citizenship if your desiignated by the current nazi regime an "enemy combatant". This needs no explanation.
4. The institutionalization of torture in America.
5. Loss of sovereignty as currently passed by the Congress in the CAFTA Bill in which vitamins and minerals will be take away and given to the "baby killing drug companies" THis is a direct assault on Americas right to "Life, liberty and pursuit of Happiness.
6. Total and complete violation of the Posse Comitatus law in which the military now occupies civilian streets as seen during protest demonstations. Gosh, it looked like China, tanks taking on unarmed protestors.
7. National ID card and if you don't carry it, you can be arrested. That is in the new law. Can you believe it? Remember Nazi Germany and the gestapo? "Your papers, please"!
8. Finally, last but not least, the right to work. All high paying jobs have been outsourced to foreign countries, 60% of miliary spending of our tax dollars is contracted out to foreign companies and countries. How did that happen??? OUR TAX DOLLARS USED TO CREATE JOBS FOR SOMEOTHER COUNTRY????
So, that is what we will be asking of our children who will have no jobs to come back to after they are either maimed, wounded or otherwise scared for life. I DON'T THINK SO!
This time, I am telling the kids to resist and go to jail rather than fight this dirty war for oil and military industrial complex profits as we were warned by Gen/Pres Eisenhower in 1961. WE did not listen then, but we are listening now.
NO DRAFT AND NO COOPERATION. PRotect the children and hide them, send them overseas, do not send them to Canada. They are going through the same thing we are and a treaty is now in place to return those who run. SEnd the to Venezuela. LOL They hate the US Gov almost as much as we do right now. hahahahaha Now there is a place we could fight for our freedoms by helping them. P
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» If there is a draft please do come to Canada
Posted by: demidesigrrl
» RE: If there is a draft please do come to Canada
Posted by: Kat144
» RE: What would these draftees be fighting for???
Posted by: DavidTbone
» RE: What would these draftees be fighting for???
Posted by: dandelion
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on Jul 5, 2005 7:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks in part to the "let those who want to be there (i.e. the military), be there" position of Vietnam era draft resistance organizations, the United States military is no longer made up of short-term citizen soldiers but a large standing professional army. The lessons of history are clear: large standing professional armies lead to military dictatorships. Moreover, professional militaries tend to foster a sense of separateness and moral superiority toward the majority of the civilian population. The United States Marine Corps is an extreme example of this attitude found among many front-line combat troops. It is also seeping out into the civilian world as returning veterans take positions in law enforcement agencies.
The Reagan administration made it easy for Americans to "support the troops" with little sacrifice. A yard sign now suffices for many.
It is time to return to the concept of "the citizen soldier." Progressives should either support a national service draft, such as the now moribund Hollings-Rangel Bill, or the recommendations of Andrew J. Bacevich.
Perhaps had our military not been full of men and women who are there because they want to be there Bush may have thought twice about committing them to a disastrous foreign misadventure. Perhaps, had there been draftees in the American military on March 20, 2003. soldiers might have taken Prof. Lawrence Mosqueda's advice and refused to obey a mad president's unlawful order.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Draft resistors bear some responsibility for our current situation
Posted by: Pepper
» And "they" will never send their children or grandchildren...
Posted by: sausage
» RE: And "they" will never send their children or grandchildren...
Posted by: jakstrate
» MORE SPIN!
Posted by: susan9390
» Sure, It's all Jane Fonda's Fault ....
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: DECEITFUL NEOCONS bear all responsibility for our current situation
Posted by: jakstrate
» RE: Draft resistors bear some responsibility for our current situation
Posted by: Halaby
Comments are closed-
Posted by: troodos on Jul 5, 2005 8:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go to www.congress.org and if you know what your zip code is, put it in the convenient space provided for it and press "go" and the program will find your senators and represenatives for you. Then you can complain to your hearts content. I know its not as snappy as writing your idiot comments on this blog but it sure will have an effect.
Since you people were too lazy or couldn't take time out from bending your elbow at the bar to vote against the idiot who now resides in the White House thanks to your non-voting propensities, perhaps you can write to your senators and representatives and keep your a-- out of uniform and support the troops by bringing them home.
If you do nothing again, then you deserve what you get AGAIN!!!!
Get smart, get writing where it will do some good.
Remember the sign on the refrigerator door:
" A small town in Texas is missing its idiot."
Perhaps you can do everybody a favor and send the idiot back to Crawford.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» GET REAL...
Posted by: susan9390
» RE: GET REAL...
Posted by: dandelion
» your comments are degrading
Posted by: dai766
» RE: your comments are degrading
Posted by: Kajamian
» RE: your comments are degrading
Posted by: dai766
» RE: your comments are degrading
Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: your comments are degrading
Posted by: Kat144
» RE: Troodos12
Posted by: faye
» RE: Troodos12
Posted by: jakstrate
» Oh, please
Posted by: Kat144
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BILL D on Jul 5, 2005 8:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of the all the spin, an incident must happen. Such incident
would have to have the magnitude or worse than the one
that was devised on 9-11 that entailed extenisve planning.
based on what they pulled off on 9-11 is beyond my
imagination, so a new one would really have to jack up
support of all the sheeple that still have thier heads burried
in the muck of lies and deception.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: GOVT WATCHER
Posted by: twotroo2bgood
» RE: GOVT WATCHER
Posted by: dandelion
» RE: GOVT WATCHER
Posted by: treehuggingliberal
» RE: GOVT WATCHER
Posted by: Ratmonster Spook
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jyoung on Jul 5, 2005 9:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, after reading about the money being made (essentially a new kind of war profiteering) in articles and programs like this Frontline episode - "Private Warriors" I don't know why the US would want to reinstate the draft. When so many private US and International corporations are seeing money pour in, and therefore shareholder value increasing, by gaining contracts into facets of military action never before yielded to private sources, it would actually seem to be detrimental to these various economies to reinstate the draft.
Why would those who profit economically and politically from the war choose to divert the current flow of money in order to train unwilling, underpaid, draftees who's parents are back home finally asking tough questions and/or protesting? That's a horrible scenario for this administration.
I tend to agree with it being 'the wrong question'. I feel that the military effort will continue to grow using a mixture of underpaid strictly managed enlisted military working along side overpaid unaccountable private military support service agencies. There's something horribly perverse about private companies being paid billions of tax dollars to feed underpaid troops 3 different kinds of ice cream and pizza before sending them off in ill equipped Humvees to be attacked by insurgents that didn't exist until after we entered the country - but this kind of catastrophe is a lot more subtle than a draft. Which is why a draft won't come until things get way more desperate.
So for now I see the concern over the draft as being a dream of the anti-war movement. It represents that desperate hope that a draft would: awaken the sleeping giant of civil dissent; reveal the truth and lies behind this war; prove the draft nay-sayers wrong. But for the Bush administration, there are still other options to be implemented, and there remains a strong self interest in keeping that giant asleep.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Draft as anti-war dream?
Posted by: dandelion
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sheherezade on Jul 5, 2005 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Abstinence Pledge
Posted by: Kat144
Comments are closed-
Posted by: luckycef on Jul 5, 2005 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was in all medical and dental was covered by the US Govt. for the family. Now they make em pay for a big chunk. The servicemembers are in POVERTY PAY and making ends meet is very hard. They just keep taking away and away, this in turns drives away good people
The Military Exchange and Commissary is a big joke, no sales tax but they get away with a surcharge that accounts for the same thing a Tax in disguise.
There are a few things that do have a reduction but the items most service persons buy are higher or the same. Not much of a bargain and sales on the most bought items.
The fuel prices are good but 40 cents higher than the Govt. contract and the base it on what it would cost at civilian gas stations in the US. This price will fluctuate as the prices change even though they have a set price for year that does not change.
In other words the Military is its own worst enemy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Jul 5, 2005 11:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you can't afford college, then the military is path to take. Why? Because a college education, like a Lamborghini, is out of their price range, lest their parents cough up the money or having to work two jobs to pay for it.
If you pay attention to the Army's catchy commercials like "An Army of One" or this one from yesteryear-"Be All That You Can Be; Find Your Future in the Army" doesn't register a rush to a recruitment office these days.
I think people expect American military campaigns to be painless and with few deaths as possible. They think our fancy weapons and other gadgets is enough, but you still need someone to operate the guns and man the vehicles.
One last thing; It's good to see people stand up to the militarization of our schools by trying to eliminate ROTC programs. My high school had a NJROTC-Naval Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps and I was amazed that some of my friends joined it.
The army of the future is already here. You won't find rich kids enlisting....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: iana_gheddis420 on Jul 5, 2005 1:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Iana
Posted by: diamondvajra
» What kind of ignorant jackass are you???????
Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: Iana
Posted by: Somedaysoon
» RE: Iana
Posted by: jakstrate
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Schmedlap on Jul 5, 2005 1:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Potential draftees would benefit is at least two ways:
- First, the sons and daughters of the affluent and influential would have no more opportunity to avoid the draft than the son of the sons and daughters of the guileless pauper.
- Second, the draft pool would be very large thereby decreasing substantially the odds of being caught in the sort of draft contrived for Vietnam, where I served.
The nation would be better off because the Armed Forces would have broader cross-section of talent, some of whom may even speak Arabic or Farsi.
I have seen college graduate, two-year draftee Spec-4s work directly with low IQ, but hard working, twenty years of service Spec-4s. These troops develop a mutual respect which is sadly missing in our now class-conscioius nation. When these people end their military status, they have developed an empathy, not otherwise obtainable, for the other fellow resulting in legislation that would not be as skewed toward the wealthy as it is today.
The nation would also benefit because there would be a much greater reluctance on the part of the government to frivolously initiate a war. Lives valuable to civilian pursuits and to essential military endeavors would not be squandered and billions, if not trillions, more dollars would be available for more worthy domestic and foreign uses.
I served in the volunteer Army for years as well, and while the all volunteeer force does have some benefits, I believe that these do not compare to what we have lost in the Army by eliminating the draft. I'd bet that even the GIs with service in Iraq would agree with that (once they got out of the service, of course).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Draft
Posted by: Kajamian
» RE: Draft
Posted by: Gene
Comments are closed-
Posted by: diamondvajra on Jul 5, 2005 1:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Like Kerry and Biden will stop the war?
Posted by: sheherezade
Comments are closed-
Posted by: diamondvajra on Jul 5, 2005 1:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: iana_gheddis420
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: rubymydear
» :-)
Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: iana_gheddis420
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: Product of Public Schools
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: Schmedlap
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: iana_gheddis420
» RE: where are you from?
Posted by: MausMasher
» Grow up lad
Posted by: taxidave
Comments are closed-
Posted by: diof09 on Jul 5, 2005 2:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» and even worse
Posted by: WhatNow?
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whitis on Jul 5, 2005 4:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Draft legislation goes by names like "bancruptcy bill", "CAFTA", "war on drugs", "patriot act", etc.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Halaby on Jul 5, 2005 5:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh really?
Posted by: Halaby
» RE: Oh really?
Posted by: Halaby
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fat otter on Jul 5, 2005 6:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: royrogers on Jul 5, 2005 7:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Close the space between information and clearinghouse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: royrogers on Jul 5, 2005 8:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Close the space between information and clearinghouse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rad on Jul 5, 2005 11:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sunny308 on Jul 6, 2005 7:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at the long term effects of how a draft would force a president to obey the Constitution. We have not been involved in a constitutional war since WWII. Could you picture the Bush twins patrolling the streets of Takrit?
Citizen (Capital C)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Go for the Draft
Posted by: goldenbb
» RE: Go for the Draft
Posted by: sunny308
» RE: Go for the Draft
Posted by: Kat144
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Schmedlap on Jul 6, 2005 8:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"BBC NEWS
European unemployment rates fall
Strong job creation in Germany and Spain pushed European unemployment rates lower in May, Eurostat data show.
Both saw unemployment rates drop from double-digit figures: Germany's unemployment rate fell from 10% to 9.6% and Spain's to 9.9% from 10%.
In both the EU at large and in the smaller eurozone, the unemployment rate fell to 8.8% in May from 8.9% in April.
In the 25 EU member states there were 19.1 million job seekers, 12.8 million of them in the eurozone.
Unemployment rates are high when compared with the US, where the unemployment rate is 5.1%, and Japan, where the rate is 4.4%.
And in Europe's two biggest economies, Germany and France, high unemployment has become a political issue.
Lengthy battle
Friday's data follows a report released earlier this week, which showed German business confidence had improved for the first time in five months.
The recent fall in the euro sparked fresh optimism among German firms.
Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's proposed economic reforms have however met with much resistance, where unemployment hit its highest level since the 1930s earlier this year.
On Friday, Mr Schroeder lost a confidence vote in parliament, paving the way for its dissolution and early elections, as he wanted.
"If we are to continue with this agenda, legitimacy through new elections is required," Mr Schroeder said.
In neighbouring France, where the unemployment rate it at a five-year peak of 10.2%, Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin has made the battle against unemployment a priority."
Story from BBC NEWS, published on July 1, 2005.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 12%
Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: goldenbb on Jul 6, 2005 8:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not as if we the people are, or ever have been, in control of the US government, so why bother getting involved? My experiences with the feds are running nearly 100% NEGATIVE at this point in my life. How much cynicism am I supposed to ignore before I just throw in the towel on the whole damn bunch of nonsense? The more 18-25 year olds who drop out, the better chance America has of being good again. If you never buy in, they can't control your choices.
And how is Milton Friedman to blame for the all-volunteer military? I thought it was Congress that orchestrated that after the Vietnam war in hopes of ensuring there would never be another Vietnam war. Guess that didn't work, either. At least we are not watching poorly trained draftees dying by the thousands (yet).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Non-voters are pathetic!!!
Posted by: Diecash1
» They already won. n/t
Posted by: Kat144
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jake on Jul 6, 2005 10:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gedlo on Jul 6, 2005 1:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prior to the invasion of Eye-rack there were MANY demonstrations in the USA where MILLIONS of people demonstrated against the war. Congress ADMITTED that their mail was close to 90% against....and those whores voted the limited endorsement for the war, which the Moe-ron didn't follow anyway. Couple those facts with Diebold voting machines (What possible legitimate purpose do voting machines that cannot be audited serve?), and the rational folks conclude that we are waaaay beyond the illusory two-party politics here. It's either tar and feather time, or the nation (and possibly the world) are down the tubes. Our so-called "leaders" were bought and paid for a long time ago. Oh for a few congressmen like George Galloway!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VAGreen on Jul 6, 2005 3:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: timtufuga on Jul 7, 2005 3:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now we have seen America at its most ugliest face. America and their war on terror has become a war which will remain an indictment against American hegemonic leadership disaster and an indignation by a world fed up with the halfhearted raison de tre for joining an ignominous war in the middle east. So how would anyone in congress allow unbridled power to force its own people to fight an ignoniminous war for Caesar Commodus's honour, profit and American imperial nascency.
when he is offended then his definition of evil doers are transformed into terrorists as may be noted with NY loss of the Olympics and then the bombing in London only a ew hours ago. I can only suggest that America is guilty of the "Kettle calling the Pot Black". Who is going to punsih America now for an overt act of terror against Londoners?????
This reminds me of Rainbow Warrior in NZ, in 1985, and the French were guilty then, and since the American and French were too powerful NZ, were Pyrrhic in their cries of foul play, they could not fight back France or America for that matter this time as well. Is America and France in collusion once again now, is England like NZ once again in 2005???? Who can truly be held accountable in this instance? Great Britain and The Commonwealth of Nations, might find some teeth though, we might have our covert war actioned very soon now. This time the "Coalition of the Willing" might be dead and buried, Al Qaida can not be blamed for this one for sure. Australia will be good to America because of their contractual obligations for the F22 Strikefighters and other goodies for sycophancy to America.
You might need conscription for America to fight the Commonwealth of Nations for a real war on terror. How about that for something real and relevant for conscription for idle and useless Yankee trash?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» What a load of incoherent bull$@@%!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: What a load of incoherent bull$@@%!!!!!!!!
Posted by: royrogers
» RE: What a load of incoherent bull$@@%!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: What a load of incoherent bull$@@%!!!!!!!!
Posted by: royrogers
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Alusch on Jul 7, 2005 8:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Russia's state prosecutor announced Tuesday afternoon that he is canceling an investigation into claims that a 19th century abridged code of Jewish law (halakha) contains incitement against non-Jews. …
Controversial text, quoted from “Kitzur Shulhan Arukh”:
linked text
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sethpjohnson on Jul 9, 2005 5:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is ridiculous. You can predict who will join the Army based on social factors, who their parents are. What does that say about choice? What does that mean for a volunteer army? It means good press, thats what.
Choice, its the reason that although on September 11 more people died from cigarettes than from plane crashes we only care about the plane crashes. We have an all-volunteer smoking brigade, so who cares? Its their choice.
Choice, girls wear more jewelry than boys. What does that say about choice?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jul 9, 2005 11:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This resulted in a 'less than marginal' report and
an honorable discharge, even better a reenlistment classification that was so low they would draft the disabled before me. Try it guys it'll help. Then we stop putting folks that believe killing is an acceptable 'Final Solution' in positions of power.They want better killing toys and
will commit treason to make a sale.We adopt a far better 'Forgien Policy' .9/11 taught us that our current and past policies pretty much stunk.The
Light of the World does'nt get terrorized, unless of course it really shines a dark light.If you judge by their actions you'd have to agree that with the recycling personell
program militarization seathing into our lives it is truly a Dark Light that they shine.Combat Veterans,start telling the truth about what combat looks like, the truth about how disturbing it is to light your buddies cigarette and before the match is out you're looking at someone without a face,and you did'nt hear the shot.Or how you almost threw up seeing 3 guys whose life you're trying to save that have their skin blown off.
There is great strength in the path of the Peacemaker but it does'nt come from Force of Arms.It comes from respecting others culture,religion,and natural rescorces.It comes by not dangling the rotted carrot our forgien has been. Become 'The Walkers of our Talk'.If you're going to end poverty,end it!
The electing of killer/contractors must stop.
Don't forget to check yourself.To be a Peacemaker is not easy
by any means.You become the wellspring of Tolerance,Understanding and Compassion.You have respect for every Living Thing and for those you see as not living.You become willing to give the shirt off your back
to someone worse off than you,even if it's your only shirt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rockpicker on Jul 9, 2005 3:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When we start from deluded sleep
at last, and know the dream
for dream, embraced en masse...
When bells that rang victorious
hang mute, their tarnished claims
ignored in disrepute,
and bitter sons, having been all
they could be, can't wish back the hand
or the leg below the knee...
(The brash regime trims reason
from its ranks, its black guard
in the street, protecting flanks.)
Then will we heed the schemers'
gloating leer? "There's no future
for any of you here."
So row on row, with hand
in trembling hand, it's come to this:
we dreamers better stand.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: metamind on Jul 10, 2005 8:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
didn't find anything. It's basically a draft for service to one's
country. You could choose whether you wanted to serve in
a military or non-military role but every young person would
have to serve in some capacity unless they were physically
or mentally unable to do so. No exemptions for college ... you'd
have to do it after you got out of college.
As far as the idea that these Republicans will keep throwing
money at people to get them to sign up .... consider the
possibility of an economic collapse. It may be closer than
we realize.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gwynnivere on May 2, 2006 4:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




