Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Debtor Nation at Red Alert

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted June 28, 2005.


If Democrats can link our spiraling personal and public debt to Republican economic policies, they might be able to head off a looming economic disaster -- and make some gains at the polls.
Debtor Nation at Red Alert
Debtor Nation at Red Alert

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Joshua Holland

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It is a dark wonder that one of the gravest threats to our economy, rising debt --and I mean tons of debt, mountains of debt at every level--is an issue so rarely discussed in polite company. Perhaps the silence is due to the stigma attached; in a country where we're told boundless opportunities exist and unfettered "economic freedom" is the name of the game, failure to keep your head above water is damning evidence of an individual's lack of worth.

But while there's shame attached to our private debt-- over a third of Americans filing for bankruptcy have had to deal with the humiliation of having their electricity or telephone cut off--our elected officials in Washington shamelessly continue to pile up public debt of stunning proportions.

Most people fail to see that the sources of public and private debt are the same, or how the two are bound together by public policy. But if progressives can make those connections in the mind of the public, they'll have a real opportunity to show just how powerful and pragmatic liberal values really are.

Culture of Debt

Debt has replaced baseball as our national pastime; it's one of the few things we all share in common. From the poorest neighborhoods where "payday loans" and a host of other predatory lending schemes soak up usurious interest, to the wealthiest fifth of the population who, according to the Wall Street Journal, have the highest ratio of debt to disposable income, virtually all of us are in the hole to one extent or another.

In recent years, states have been issuing more bonds to make up for federal shortfalls, the federal deficit is projected to remain astronomically high for the next 10 years and consumer debt--and bankruptcies--have hit record highs. Tax code changes in the 1970s led corporations to pile on massive debt in the 1980s, a decade when junk bonds and debt-leveraged buy-outs dominated media stories.

Debt has become part of our culture, a product of a society bent on self-gratification now and future generations be damned. Like any cultural trend, we are constantly enticed to take part. From the endless pre-approved credit card offers that fill up our mailboxes to the home shopping shows' 'painless' lay-away plans, debt is easier and easier to incur. Wells Fargo advertised a credit card with an "easy-access" line of home equity credit as a way to help pay "for everyday expenses, like gas, groceries, clothes, etc," prompting a CNN reporter to observe that today, it is possible for Americans to "eat their homes."

According to PBS' "Now," personal bankruptcy filings increased 320 percent between 1980 and 2004. As I'm writing this, a baby born in America owes $26,000 dollars worth of national debt. Students graduate today with an average of over $20,000 in student loans and credit card debt, and those who borrowed to pay for a graduate degree come out of school with a median debt of almost $46,000 dollars--up 72 percent since 1997 according to Brendan Koerner, a fellow at the New America Foundation.

Average Americans--who managed to save almost 9 percent of their after-tax income following World War II-- are running in place in terms of wages and staggering under an ever-increasing debt load. A report by the Center for American Progress showed that while their incomes had fallen for three years in a row through 2003, families encountered "sharply higher costs for education, energy, housing, and health care." Making matters worse, they faced rising costs for the debt that they had already piled up.

Part of the explosion of personal debt was fueled by mortgage refinancing as people cashed in on low interest rates. But as much as we hear about the real estate boom (President Bush often notes that more Americans own their homes than ever before), the percentage of equity we have in our homes is the lowest it's ever been.

On the public side, our mounting debt should be as alarming as a repossession notice tacked to the door. And there's a similar dynamic at work: one of the worst crimes government administrators can commit is failing to spend their agencies' entire allocated budgets.

Add to that a consensus that federal spending and perennial tax-cutting are keys to economic growth, with little regard to what kind of spending or which taxes are cut, and you get a perfect, self-reinforcing circle of bad fiscal policy.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Joshua Holland is a fair-trade activist, a freelance writer and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Think Americans will listen this time?
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 28, 2005 1:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must be missing something, because all that is what I heard Kerry and the rest of the Demos saying in the last campaign.

Will the fact that even Republican moderates are now upset at the fiscal recklessness in the Congress make a difference? (Domenici is reported to be willing to rebel.) I doubt it.

I expect the official Republican response again will be, it's just Chicken Little whose sky is falling all over again.

It is not the voters that will make a difference. Congress stopped listening to the voters a long time ago. (Remember the voters opposed to Clinton's impeachment? It was in the 60s percentages. Didn't matter.)

It is the members of Congress who need to be convinced. Forgive me, but I think they've heard all these arguments a million times already.

And voters will not change their minds until we hit the wall. Yes, it's coming. But not soon enough. How about some good advice for surviving a bankrupt government?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who benefits from the debt?
Posted by: acaryatid on Jun 28, 2005 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1913 Congress passed The Federal Reserve Act which gave the right to create currency to the private bankers. They selected the operating name The Federal Reserve Corporation. Despite all the name implies, it is a private organization benefiting from interest charged to the Nation by lending their privately created Reserve Notes to the country. As the debt spirals skyward the revenue to the banks soars as well.

In 1963 President Kennedy signed an executive order returning the banking operations to the country. $4 billion in "United States Notes" were printed to replace the private notes with a national currency. As article 1 of the Constitution states, Congress would regain the power to coin and regulate money and we would be a debt free nation.

President Kennedy's assasination followed and the new currency was destroyed. The banks remained in the hands of the members of the Russell Trust Corporation.

As a member of the Russell Trust, George Bush is doing a superior job of increasing revenues to the banks by increasing the national debt. Once Americans recognise the RTC as the organized crime operation they are, the plundering of our resources and bankrupting of our economy will make sense as part of a successful business plan.

While many of us shake our heads at the clear insanity of much of what GW has done, his performance is second to none when measured by benefits returned to the RTC membership.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You have my attention Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: You have my attention Posted by: hermit
» RE: You have my attention Posted by: Sojourner
Isn't anyone paying attention?
Posted by: dan10opa on Jun 28, 2005 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats won the past two presidential elections. It was the elctronic voting machines that gave Republicans the results.
WHEN will this issue get some aritme?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rod from Canada Posted by: Rod from Canada
» RE: Isn't anyone paying attention? Posted by: monkeywrench
Khushite
Posted by: Khushite on Jun 28, 2005 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't everyone already know, that the USA was overthrown by Coup d'tat years ago? Eisenhower warned the nation, but the people were only interested in selfishness and materialism...and we are paying under a classical fascism/corporate/prison complex.
Any Enemy Combatants (dissidents) out there? You bet there is, and Patriot II is awaiting you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Khushite Posted by: jakstrate
"New" Democrats and Blue Dogs, elephants in donkey suits
Posted by: sausage on Jun 28, 2005 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In April of this year 73 Democrats voted with the House Republican majority making it more difficult for citizens, who've gone into ruinous debt due to job loss or illness, to file bankruptcy.

One of that 73 is my Democratic Congressmember. I met the man. Shook his hand. I supported him with small donations and letters-to-the-editor. I voted for him. Then he votes with the credit card industry.

I'm tired of so-called "New" Democrats and Blue Dogs taking my vote for granted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OK, listen up!!!!! THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PARTIES!
Posted by: Pepper on Jun 28, 2005 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did you get that???? Why do progressives keep saying "Well, here is a way for the Democrats to take back control"?

Believe me when I say that even Clinton, it turns out, laid all the appropriate groundwork for what Bush has done now that he simply put on top of the foundation laid by Clinton, That was why the sex scandel was so important. It was a massive distraction so we would not pick up on the beginnings of the assault against our Constitutional and Bill of Rights.

Now we are going to get Hillary to finish the job, with Cain running to split the vote on the repub side. It matters not a wit who is PResident. It will only be those bought and paid for.
We have lost the right to vote and we are going down.

The question is "how do we rebuild and what do we rebuild" after the "dissidents" get through ridding us of these pirana's.
This group of Fed Res people including the chairman had a mission to destroy our economy so we will fit nicely into a one world economy and workforce. The Fed REs and the RTC is owned by the Bank of London and that is why the Queen quietly knighted Greenspan about a year ago "for his work in aiding the Bank of London and for his work on the global economy". Notice she didn't say whether it was good or bad rather it was work done by the BOL and Greenspan assisted.

It was also reported that Greenspan, LIKE NO OTHER TIME IN HISTORY, met over 45 times at the White House with the PResident, so they know what they are doing and they are pulling the strings.

BUY GOLD AND TAKE PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF IT. That will be your only saving grace. I did and boy am I glad I did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pipe Dream
Posted by: 42Years on Jun 28, 2005 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democrats are hand-in-hand with the Republicans. There is no partisan cure to the ills and woes we face today. It is systemic. And for better or worse it will have to run its course. Waiting for our political system to resolve anything of importance is like waiting for the rush of the drug from the needle puncture to reach your brain. It gets there, makes you feel good for a brief moment, then lets you crash.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How is your Chinese?
Posted by: Riverside on Jun 28, 2005 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, if this nation slides into a bankrupt status, we will slide right into the hands of China. Why? China holds most of our IOUs. If they decided to call in those notes right now, we would nearly crumble.

The biggest signal of our serious economic crisis is the failing auto industry, our last really BIG manufacturing industry. If and when they fully collapse, we will see a depression that will make the Great Depression seem like a mild, short-term recession.

The true economic power of this nation has been that solid, blue-collar workforce that has not only built just what we wanted, but by virtue of their numbers and spending they have been strong foundations of our economy. So when then fall, what follows?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How is your Chinese? Posted by: verdanteye@yahoo.com
» RE: How is your Chinese? Posted by: kungfoofighterx
The Big Lie of the '80's
Posted by: asque on Jun 28, 2005 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've always wondered why the '80's are considered so prosperous. True, low tax rates produced a huge stock market bubble, but cities and states were struggling to maintain the infrastructure built in the '50's, when the top income taxes were 90%. Near as I can determine, from 1950-1965 the percentage growth in the GDP was nearly equal to that of the period 1980-1995 in constant dollars. But what a huge difference in attitude. In 1960 we could dream of ending poverty while going into space, after having built the interstates and putting the boomers through school. Compare that to the latter time when taxes were low, and the best educated generation ever produced, the boomers, should have been at their productive peak.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We Are All At Risk
Posted by: Sandra on Jun 28, 2005 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Information about the financial issues that impact this country has been out there for a while. Some of the commercial media has covered the deficit and our government's lack of concern for the debt that stands to undermine the security of this country. Some polls have shown that the public is concerned about the debt being passed on to future generations. The billions spent on the war in Iraq have begun to scare people, particularly with no end in sight and other wars on the horizon. Those of us who are balancing our checkbooks and trying to live within our means are worried about a total collapse of the economy in the near future. The Republicans own the white house, the Congress and the judiciary. We can demand that the Republican leadership be held accountable for the financial mess that we're in as a country. Democrats should take a strong lead and demand that the Republican leadership acknowledge the problems and begin to address them. We understand that the Democrats are also part of the problem. We also understand that right now the Democrats are the means that we have to continue to relentlessly get the issues before the Congress, the public and the media and demand actions. We the people must also speak loudly and plainly about our concerns at every opportunity. One of our major concerns has to be that fiscal changes that are made to bring the deficit down and to put limits on future spending are not completely on the backs of federal programs that benefit many of the people. We must demand that corporations and the top 1% pay their share. What a sorry mess we're all in. We are all at risk if the government does not address these financial issues now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democrats????
Posted by: nakis on Jun 28, 2005 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Um, in the first paragraph the author states to the affect that Democrats need to act on the financial insolvency of the Republicans to save the nation and propel their party. But that's the only place he says the word Democract.
In the other part where he states that action should be taken by a group he cites progressives.
I'm not arguing against the point of the article. The Republicans and neocons have put America on the highway to hell.
I'm just not sure what the author is doing calling for Democrats to do something in the beginning and then call on progressives not mentioning Democrats again.

My point being. I just got an e-mail yesterday from the DNC/Howard Dean. They are asking me to buy Democracy Bonds to support the Democratic party which naturally is the real supporters of democracy in America. It goes on to tell me that this is how I can take control of the parties future and reclaim the government. How Republicans can raise big money checks to push their agenda. How I should get family, neighbors and friends to buy these "bonds" too. So we can all get back America.

I've heard this same pitch (with different titles shuffled words) from them for years. They call me at home asking me to play the same game once again with some hopefully catchier new title.
Isn't the definition of insanity is that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?

Why is the Democratic Party trying to play the same game knowing the rules haven't changed? Doesn't this speak to us that they're doing exactly what they want to do? Want us to do? Play the same game that they have the same stakes in as many of the Republicans.

I am not faulting the author. As a progressive I'm sure he wants to motivate the Democrats, just as I do, to change the path of the party to a progressive one. Where the many progressives can then start to back them up in changing our nation for the better.

I wish Mr. Holland luck. The Democratic Party is not interested in changing it's spots any time soon. And trying a new campaign (in packaging only) that is anything but campaign reform is not going to motivate too many progressives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democrats???? Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Democrats???? Posted by: hermit
Progressives Must Bolt From the Democrat Party!
Posted by: mstenger on Jun 28, 2005 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way we Progessives (Hmmm....nice name for a NEW party!) are going to accomplish anything is to relinquish our Democrat membership and join the Greens or create another party. The Dumbocrats ARE exactly like the Re-puke-lickens. This I learned after I, like many of you, sold out and voted for Kerry and got nothing in return! I will not be a sellout loser again! Alexander Cockburn said it best: "They're (Democrats) a huge rotting albatross hanging around the neck of every single left person in this country."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Two Cents
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jun 28, 2005 2:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is my opinion:
You cannot expect ANY party to rescue you from the government. As soon as any third party looks like they have a chance to win, special interests will buy them with the campaign money that the party needs to get its messsage out. Do not expect that your vote to count for much. The infamous special interests have a big advantage over you. They can finance both parties and remain in power regardless of who wins or loses the election.

Though WE the people have the clout,
To throw the POLITICIANS out,
We'd still RULED by greedy "smarties",
Who give MONEY to both parties,
So, here's the TRUTH, without a doubt,
We can't vote THOSE rascals out.

http://www.lincolninitiative.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My Two Cents Posted by: kungfoofighterx
» RE: My Two Cents Posted by: a;slkdjf
» RE: My Two Cents Posted by: hermit
"Good Politics" requires legal voting processes
Posted by: blacksheep on Jun 29, 2005 1:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, hello? -- Wakey wakey, America! Smell the coffee!!!! Corporate Republicans have provatized the voting so that tabulations take place on their software, which is not inspected by public officials! There is NO point trying to appeal to some segment of the population to win the vote until voting is legally conducted with transparent public, bipartisan processes and procedures. THIS IS NOT CURRENTLY HAPPENING. It stopped happening in 2000. WAKE UP AND FACE THE FACTS! Diebold and Elections Systems and Software (ES&S) count the American vote. They are sister companies founded by a pair of brothers and they run the same software, which is secret, private, 'proprietary'. This means that Americans are voting on blind faith, and trusting Republican corporations not to fiddle the numbers. Wake the F---k up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vote with your wallet instead
Posted by: Mobius_Mind on Aug 2, 2005 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you *really* want to do something about this, rather than pontificate about how *someone* should do something about it... take action yourself. This is not hard to do, start voting with your wallet - don't give your hard earned dollars to the big guys, change to a regional bank (after making sure it is localy owned) and reduce your debt... Without money the big guys can't buy the pollies now can they? A quick search will return a plethora of sites dedicated to this very method... take action, instigate change from the grass roots - vote with your wallet!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]